DOOM - All Monsters Comparison - DOOM I-II (93-94) vs DOOM (2016) vs DOOM Eternal - side by side - 4k 60fps All the game captures, editing, thumbnail were done by me.
@@TheOneAndOnlyMasemanFunStuff Yeah. I can tell that was what they were going for. I still prefer 2016’s more gritty and scary designs but Eternal definitely does give off classic DOOM vibes
I think this is definitely true with the revenant. They also act a lot more animated, but you usually do not see them sitting static like that in the game. I am SO GLAD they brought back the classic cyberdemon. Also the new mancubus is better. Doom Eternal feels more like Doom 2 overall. I will never forget playing the earth levels in the original doom 2 and seeing the low-res ruined background texture and feeling chills. If only my 12 year old self could see how stunning and surreal the backdrops are of doom eternal.
Doom classic monsters somewhat looks scary in a psychological way. They look like twisted mutilated deformed humans. My first doom game is The plutonia experiment, I was like 9 years old, the scariest level at that time was MAP11: Hunted.
@MelonieDaniels-mr3qb I say that about resi 4 onwards though 7 brought it back kinda and revelations somewhat...but when it comes to doom and quake just give a run and gun game old school with its puzzles and secrets
Doom 3 was great. Mancubus in that game was amazing, easily the best the series have seen. Imps didn't look the best, but i liked how they used them in that game. One of my favourite games, and while not at initially entertaining or satisfying as the Dooms, it also feels less forgettable. I think i liked it more than eternal. Eternal was a bit of a mess
The second half of Doom 3 it feels so much more like Doom than any of the crap in D16 or Eternal which are just repetitive arena shooters, is just more enjoyable. I actually played D3 a few years ago and was surprised by how much i enjoyed it, in contrast both new Dooms are a chore, the second time i went through D16 to get ready for Eternal i had to force myself to play it because of how boring and repetitive it is.
Les regression, more course correction. Doom 2016 took some of the character designs in a bad direction. Probably the best example being the cyberdemon. The eternal version isn't just better, it's better by leaps and bounds.
OoOoO so in Eternal they go for their OLD look but updated. That's cool. 2016 is like "darker". Love them both. Very rare [to me] that a game out does itself within multiple games. Gears of War // DOOM
They improved all of the designs except for the baron of hell. The 2016 baron is far better looking than eternals with the blades. Why have a baron of hell with blades when you already had the dread knight which has blades? Just my opinion both badass games.
I will always prefer the original and Eternal. I like that Eternal went back to the classic designs just with the graphics of today. Blows mind that so many seem to like 2016 more.
Same. 2016 models might be more "realistic" but it didn't feel nearly as "DOOM" as eternal models. Don't even get me started on that god awful 2016 mancubus reimagining
Eternal’s designs are worse than 2016’s as the eternal had a lot more demons per fight than 2016 and needed to perform better. Baron of hell is better tho
Except this is just plain wrong, there's a video that compares closely 2016 and eternal monsters and I think except for the revenant every monster in eternal is way more detailed. Why would they need to make the enemies look worse to make the game perform better when they're adding new gore mechanics for every single enemy to every bullet you fire into them
I love how faithful Doom Eternal is to the original games while expanding on them like crazy. No shade to Doom 2016 but there’s a reason I’ve played significantly more Eternal lol
The problem is that just like Doom3 it all looks like clay models.. the whole model looks like a cut out mesh, and the entire texture has the same matte/glossy finish. Why isnt there a difference - bone, flesh, skin, fur - it should all have distinct material finishes. I don't know if the engine or the modellers is the issue, but it certainly does not live up to what I expect could be the best 3D-conversion of the amazing original Doom monsters.
@@camaxide I agree mate, I don't understand why nowadays all textures have to look shiny. The old pixel made everything look alive, despite being so primitive in comparison
I didn’t realize until now how terrifying the cacodemon and hell knights were in 2016, one not having eyes and the other having no pupil just an eye is scary
I hope for Doom the Dark Ages, they go for a more primal look for the demons because the bright colors from Eternal definitely won’t work. 2016 definitely had the better design choices, still baffles me as to why they went an almost cartoon route with Eternal.
2016 is easily the best demon design in the series. Eternal went way too cartoonish and a lot of the details feel like they've been flattened or diminished. It's like looking at the difference between Halo 4 and Halo 5...
The cyberdemon got a massive downgrade from 2016 to eternal, but I will say it’s a lot more accurate to the original. 2016’s one is a lot more intimidating.
Would be cool to see the comparison with Doom 3 included. It was 11 years after the original Doom and 13 years before Doom 2016, so almost right in the middle. I know people love to hate that game, but I always liked it. It was visually impressive at the time and, although a departure from the arcade nature of the original two Dooms, it was a good game and developed the story/lore.
I feel like the actual designs are kind of 50/50, here and there between 2016 and Eternal, but I do very much appreciate how Eternal's demons don't have such over-exaggerated, bouncy, cartoonish idle animations.
Tbh I’m happy with just 1+2 but i appreciate the passion someone put to modernize the beloved franchise. Never felt I had to play nothing beyond 1+2 though
Imp: good but could be all brown. Revenant: good but seems to have shrunk in Eternal. Knight: ugly in 2016 and a little better in Eternal, I like the original which is a lite version of Baron, I would like to see that maintained. Demon: perfect, in general the more stationary demons are more intimidating than in the "restless" version (2016). Cacodemon: I prefer the perfect meatball version, in the others he just looks old and withered, Eternal is a little better. Baron: Very good but I don't understand why he turned gray. Fatso; 2016: horrible, they even turned him into a cyclops. Eternal: perfect but he's a little pale. Soul: It doesn't make sense for him to be without fire in his head, Eternal is perfect. Cyberdemon: horrible in 2016, perfect in Eternal. Pain: Good. Arachnotron: Good but his skeletal face was reused for other demons, like Imp. Vile: Perfect. Mastermind: Perfect. C.Fatso: Horrible/cool but it's a bit weird that the chest armor moves like muscle.
Do you think that the mancubus in the new doom dark ages is a combination of the previous mancs like with the more rounder head of the doom 2 mancubus more of demonic technologie and more rotting like 2016 and the doom eternal manc skin tone
In the original games the hell knight was basically just a brown baron that was a bit smaller and weaker werent they? There were slight differences in the model but not a lot from wut i saw
OG Doom and Doom Eternal are both pretty good, but feel cartoony. Doom 2016 is a lot more realistic and gritty, and the models are also more detailed in a lot of respects. I get they likely had to pull back on model detail in Eternal due to performance constraints but there difference’s are there regardless.
The cacodemon from eternal Is Crazy! Like that hyper realistic drawn creepy moments from ren and stimpy..i thing they got more original with 2016 but made the best choice for eternal to go back to the roots
i like the eternal designs more cos of how much more cartoonish they are they look a lot less threatening and considering the doomslayer doesnt feel anywhere near threatened by them it feels like im seeing the world through his eyes
If ID still done the classic hell knite i think DOOM would have been more realistic than a bald srong grey armoured human against a imatating horned half human half goat beast
I still wish they gave the HellKnight some kind of horns back. Like a little different from the Baron at least. They are both basically based on mythical Minotaur
The original doom designs were trying to make something scary with what little technology they had at the time and doom 2016 does the same (but with better tech this time), but doom eternal harkins back to the originals but just ends up looking more cartoonish and goofy and I can't say I like it over the 2016 version.
@@feltycomic8558 I agree, 2016's art focused more on atmosphere and immersion while Eternal had a more arcade-ish direction hence the designs of the demons being sort of less detailed.
Doom Eternal models are still better imo. The game is not THAT serious now, it's more of an original feel Yeah, 2016 models are kinda scarier, but still
I like the art style of 2016 better even though Eternal respects the source material better. Everything from the DOOM guy down to the guns. I just like 2016 better, and I don't even play DOOM.
Its a matter of taste, but i personally love the Eternal looks more, because they have all the character that the original sprites did 2016 is definitrly trying to fit a more "cohesive" unitifed design, but it takes alot of the charm out, especially on the Soliders, Mancubus, Cyberdemon, ect
Some of the Doom 2016 monsters, like the revenant, look more realistic than the cartoonish look of some of Eternals enemies.. Not sure why the changes were even made.
likely to be an unpopular opinion, but they really really dropped the ball on 2016 and Doom Eternal. The original designs are ambiguous in a way that feels genuinely uncanny and mysterious. The updated designs are not eerie at all they just look like monsters someone designed to look *cool* in a video game. Some of the Eternal designs feel closer to their original essence but overall still run into the same problem. They’re over-designed. FromSoftware somehow avoids this issue when they design monsters for games. The artistry gap is huge.
doom 2016 did a great deal on makin the demons scary while eternal payed more homage to the original. i like the classic demon looks in eternal but overall the demons in 2016 are graciously designed
Doom 2016 in my opinion has better designs for the demons. They look so organic and fleshy
Eternal was going for a classic look, not a super high detail look. (i think)
@@TheOneAndOnlyMasemanFunStuff Yeah. I can tell that was what they were going for. I still prefer 2016’s more gritty and scary designs but Eternal definitely does give off classic DOOM vibes
@@TheAlienHasArrived yeah
@@TheAlienHasArrived i agree tho
I think this is definitely true with the revenant. They also act a lot more animated, but you usually do not see them sitting static like that in the game. I am SO GLAD they brought back the classic cyberdemon. Also the new mancubus is better. Doom Eternal feels more like Doom 2 overall. I will never forget playing the earth levels in the original doom 2 and seeing the low-res ruined background texture and feeling chills. If only my 12 year old self could see how stunning and surreal the backdrops are of doom eternal.
Eternals demons look more cartoonish, while the 2016 demons look more like freaks of nature
Soldiers from 2016? Shotgun guy? Commando? Summoner? Hell Razer? Prowler? All the Zombies?
в DOOM есть призыватель но он по другому выглядит
@@ДмитрийВишняков-л5в Video says "all Monsters"
Doom 2 - 360p
Doom Eternal - 720p
Doom 2016 - 4K
ikr right, doom 2016 models are WAY WAY better.
I think that's more of a lighting thing
The doom eternal models are higher quality
@@aliyanahmed1516terrible opinion 🤡🤡🤡
Doom classic monsters somewhat looks scary in a psychological way. They look like twisted mutilated deformed humans.
My first doom game is The plutonia experiment, I was like 9 years old, the scariest level at that time was MAP11: Hunted.
The scariest demon monster to me is Tyrese Gibson 😊😅😂.
doom monsters just got 2 coffee and an energy drink while eternal monsters just woken up on monday
The demons of Doom 2016 is still better, they are more threatening and terrifying
Terrifying? You 12?
@@george2p I have to admit that the hell knight is a little intimidating
@@george2pyou’re a really cool tough guy
@@george2pOh like you wouldn’t be scared to face a pinky in real life. A creature that could kill you much faster than a tiger
@@manni8688 you would fear anything from both games in real life
It's so sad 2016 and eternal dont have monster alert sounds so sad how they missed that
Ikr?! :/
Yeah, really love opening a door and hearing a baron's roar
@@ammagon4519 Better yet, a good ol AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA skele' boy!
At least in doom eternal, cacodemons do their signature cry sometimes.
2016 enemies look more Alien than demon
what about the lost soul?
Aren't demons aliens?)
Yes most of them
100%
I know people hated Doom 3 but the character designs were really cool
Doom 3 good game but bad doom Game
@MelonieDaniels-mr3qb I say that about resi 4 onwards though 7 brought it back kinda and revelations somewhat...but when it comes to doom and quake just give a run and gun game old school with its puzzles and secrets
Doom 3 was great.
Mancubus in that game was amazing, easily the best the series have seen. Imps didn't look the best, but i liked how they used them in that game.
One of my favourite games, and while not at initially entertaining or satisfying as the Dooms, it also feels less forgettable.
I think i liked it more than eternal. Eternal was a bit of a mess
As a horror version of good, works great, specially the new creepy enemies like the head spiders.
The second half of Doom 3 it feels so much more like Doom than any of the crap in D16 or Eternal which are just repetitive arena shooters, is just more enjoyable.
I actually played D3 a few years ago and was surprised by how much i enjoyed it, in contrast both new Dooms are a chore, the second time i went through D16 to get ready for Eternal i had to force myself to play it because of how boring and repetitive it is.
2016 all the way
I will admit that’s Spider-mastermind design was epic and quite a few others
Wonder why Doom Eternal regressed to a more retro-faithful deal with most of the demons.
Because its awesome
You haven’t seen anything yet, the Dark ages imp looks JUST like the classic!
Probably cuz they wanted their designs to be an even closer callback to the OG designs of Doom I-II
Les regression, more course correction. Doom 2016 took some of the character designs in a bad direction. Probably the best example being the cyberdemon. The eternal version isn't just better, it's better by leaps and bounds.
Because it’s better
OoOoO so in Eternal they go for their OLD look but updated. That's cool. 2016 is like "darker". Love them both. Very rare [to me] that a game out does itself within multiple games. Gears of War // DOOM
Something about a cacodemon without pupils is just so horrifying
Doom 64 and Doom 3?
they’re are to many variants from doom 3 that aren’t in other games
it’s says in the title doom I-II vs Doom(2016 vs Doom eternal
Too terrible to include.
@@NeilusNihilusdoom 3 is not terrible same with 64
FUCK doom 3 lol
2:40 2016 even the lighting inside his mouth is well made
Doom 3 has forgotten stepchild syndrome.
They improved all of the designs except for the baron of hell. The 2016 baron is far better looking than eternals with the blades. Why have a baron of hell with blades when you already had the dread knight which has blades? Just my opinion both badass games.
I fully agree here.
I will always prefer the original and Eternal. I like that Eternal went back to the classic designs just with the graphics of today. Blows mind that so many seem to like 2016 more.
Baron of hell in eternal looks closer to baron of hell in 2. But not sure hell night got bald and hornless in 2016 and eternal?
@@filmowewyprawy Hell Knight uses Doom 3 design
@@Adam-lw8lvthanks I never play Doom3 that’s why.
Same. 2016 models might be more "realistic" but it didn't feel nearly as "DOOM" as eternal models. Don't even get me started on that god awful 2016 mancubus reimagining
OG demons are still my fav. Glad they went with the older look for the Cyber Demon in Eternal..
I think 2016 designs were more gritty and hellish, eternal seems toned down and maybe a little more retro like
I hate how in this video classic doom isn't normal pixels but some smooth shit
Ugh, texture filter
It’s probably pulled from GZdoom which is basically high def high quality og doom
@@reaperdude4234 yup. But you can turn off the texture filtering therr. And they didn't.
I want to say I prefer the 2016 He’ll Kight over the Eternal Hell Kight but every time I see it I get Samus Unknown plant Vietnam flashbacks
Yeah, Doom 3 had my favorite Mancubus.
I like both, but 2016's Hell Knight Glory Kills were better.
Am i weird for liking the classic hell knight?
Doom 2016’s Hell Knights look far more intimidating
Eternal’s just look goofy
Eternal’s designs are worse than 2016’s as the eternal had a lot more demons per fight than 2016 and needed to perform better. Baron of hell is better tho
Except this is just plain wrong, there's a video that compares closely 2016 and eternal monsters and I think except for the revenant every monster in eternal is way more detailed. Why would they need to make the enemies look worse to make the game perform better when they're adding new gore mechanics for every single enemy to every bullet you fire into them
th-cam.com/video/zNz-j6ZwmYM/w-d-xo.htmlsi=zxKFaaEntK6a73JL
@@user-ud7gv3br5d my mistake og thanks for enlightening me 🙏
Interesting. I like all the demons in eternal better except the Baron.
I love how faithful Doom Eternal is to the original games while expanding on them like crazy. No shade to Doom 2016 but there’s a reason I’ve played significantly more Eternal lol
List of personal favorite designs
Imp~DOOM(2016)
Revenant~DOOM(2016)
Hell Knight~DOOM Eternal
Pinky~DOOM Eternal
Cacodemon~DOOM(2016)
Baron Of Hell~DOOM(93~94)
Mancurus~DOOM Eternal
Lost Soul~DOOM(93~94)
Tyrant~DOOM Eternal
Soldier(blaster)~DOOM(93~94)
Plan Elemental~DOOM Eternal
Arachenotron~DOOM Eternal
Archvile~DOOM Eternal
Spider Mastermind~DOOM(93~94)
Cuball~DOOM Eternal
Cyber Mancurus~DOOM Eternal
Add:DOOM Slayer~ DOOM(2016)
It's somewhat hilarious how a 2D sprite, with all of 2 animation frames and 5 pixels looks better than the newer models.
Lol, what? No way. Doom 2016 looks the best, doom 2 is ok, but better than new ones for sure)
2016 has its own achievement. Love them. Eternal tried to take them back to the origins. Love also.
Different games, yet pieces of art in the own.
Feels wrong to completely leave out Doom 64 and Doom 3
Yeah but Doom 3 wasn't Doom and Doom 64 no one played.
@@NeilusNihilusSpeak for yourself
@@leo_the_v.3847 I think I speak for everyone.
@@NeilusNihilus You think. Well, you thought wrong.
@@leo_the_v.3847 No one knows Doom 64 except gog and it was good. Doom 3 was garbage in comoparison to 1 and 2.
You miss all the demons in doom 3😢
Ugly versions
Doom 2016 - Sci Fi;
Doom Eternal - fantasy.
Despite 30 years of graphic advancements, the original 1993 monsters are still the most kick-ass. Just an unbeatable design
Hard facts. The new enemies in 2016 and eternal are too refined, too polished, too clean.
@@einarr7301 yes, and despite that they look lifeless and not threatening
Don't know about that, I think that's just a matter of what you grew up on.
The problem is that just like Doom3 it all looks like clay models.. the whole model looks like a cut out mesh, and the entire texture has the same matte/glossy finish. Why isnt there a difference - bone, flesh, skin, fur - it should all have distinct material finishes. I don't know if the engine or the modellers is the issue, but it certainly does not live up to what I expect could be the best 3D-conversion of the amazing original Doom monsters.
@@camaxide I agree mate, I don't understand why nowadays all textures have to look shiny. The old pixel made everything look alive, despite being so primitive in comparison
I didn’t realize until now how terrifying the cacodemon and hell knights were in 2016, one not having eyes and the other having no pupil just an eye is scary
I hope for Doom the Dark Ages, they go for a more primal look for the demons because the bright colors from Eternal definitely won’t work. 2016 definitely had the better design choices, still baffles me as to why they went an almost cartoon route with Eternal.
I never liked a lot the 3d versions. I fell that they should aim for a simplier style to be more realistic. Its just my preference
They look just fine, you’re just picky
2016 is easily the best demon design in the series. Eternal went way too cartoonish and a lot of the details feel like they've been flattened or diminished. It's like looking at the difference between Halo 4 and Halo 5...
2016 all the way. Wish they kept initial imp design from 2015 demo though. It was even more demonic.
A mini hell knight basically
That one was waaaay too gray.
The cyberdemon got a massive downgrade from 2016 to eternal, but I will say it’s a lot more accurate to the original. 2016’s one is a lot more intimidating.
Doom 3 has some of the best models...
Would be cool to see the comparison with Doom 3 included. It was 11 years after the original Doom and 13 years before Doom 2016, so almost right in the middle. I know people love to hate that game, but I always liked it. It was visually impressive at the time and, although a departure from the arcade nature of the original two Dooms, it was a good game and developed the story/lore.
I feel like the actual designs are kind of 50/50, here and there between 2016 and Eternal, but I do very much appreciate how Eternal's demons don't have such over-exaggerated, bouncy, cartoonish idle animations.
Nice video! it would be amazing to see Doom 3 designs in the comparison
Tbh I’m happy with just 1+2 but i appreciate the passion someone put to modernize the beloved franchise. Never felt I had to play nothing beyond 1+2 though
Doom Eternal demons are closer to original. I really like that design choice
I liked the red, fleshy aberration theme that 2016 had going on
Blood, Guts and Dinner
Imp: good but could be all brown.
Revenant: good but seems to have shrunk in Eternal.
Knight: ugly in 2016 and a little better in Eternal, I like the original which is a lite version of Baron, I would like to see that maintained.
Demon: perfect, in general the more stationary demons are more intimidating than in the "restless" version (2016).
Cacodemon: I prefer the perfect meatball version, in the others he just looks old and withered, Eternal is a little better.
Baron: Very good but I don't understand why he turned gray.
Fatso; 2016: horrible, they even turned him into a cyclops. Eternal: perfect but he's a little pale.
Soul: It doesn't make sense for him to be without fire in his head, Eternal is perfect.
Cyberdemon: horrible in 2016, perfect in Eternal.
Pain: Good.
Arachnotron: Good but his skeletal face was reused for other demons, like Imp.
Vile: Perfect.
Mastermind: Perfect.
C.Fatso: Horrible/cool but it's a bit weird that the chest armor moves like muscle.
2016 looks so much better!
Do you think that the mancubus in the new doom dark ages is a combination of the previous mancs like with the more rounder head of the doom 2 mancubus more of demonic technologie and more rotting like 2016 and the doom eternal manc skin tone
The design of Eternal looks like a remake of the original which is good imo, and in 2016 they look more challenging.
In the original games the hell knight was basically just a brown baron that was a bit smaller and weaker werent they? There were slight differences in the model but not a lot from wut i saw
It was, 2016/Eternal Hell Knight is inspired by Doom 3 version.
@@ph-fi7qo the doom 3 one mustve been decent if the 2016 and eternal ones turned out so good
@lootbox9071 Doom 3 is the odd one among all Doom games, slow combat, dark enclosed corridors, "horror" elements
@@Carlos-kh5qu i was talking about the model for the hell knight, not the gameplay
OG Doom and Doom Eternal are both pretty good, but feel cartoony. Doom 2016 is a lot more realistic and gritty, and the models are also more detailed in a lot of respects. I get they likely had to pull back on model detail in Eternal due to performance constraints but there difference’s are there regardless.
Doom 2016 seems like a reboot while doom eternal seems like a remake
Revenant hittin the stanky leg in doom ii
The cacodemon from eternal Is Crazy! Like that hyper realistic drawn creepy moments from ren and stimpy..i thing they got more original with 2016 but made the best choice for eternal to go back to the roots
When the Archvile sound came, i hear echos of me swearing 🤬
Why id software make cyberdemon like in original... 2016 is better...
in doom eternal the devs went to recreating the classic style demons and they remade cyberdemon from the classic doom and renamed it to tyrant
Because the cyberdemon in 2016 is already dead they literally cannot bring him back
Icl the tyrant looks way more unique than the bland cyberdemon
@@bigimp3018 lmao ye
i like the eternal designs more cos of how much more cartoonish they are they look a lot less threatening and considering the doomslayer doesnt feel anywhere near threatened by them it feels like im seeing the world through his eyes
But why the demented filter
As someone played the entire series Doom 2016 has the most fun among them
Wished you added Doom 64 and Doom 3 to the comparisons too.
Doom 2016 demons look like bugs
Why is texture filtering enabled for doom 1 and 2?
If ID still done the classic hell knite i think DOOM would have been more realistic than a bald srong grey armoured human against a imatating horned half human half goat beast
Doom 64?
I still wish they gave the HellKnight some kind of horns back. Like a little different from the Baron at least. They are both basically based on mythical Minotaur
Why have your applied some weird smoothing to the original sprites? They look blurry and worse
Don't get me wrong, I think the 2016 models were amazing, but eternal felt more faithful to the original
Now do one with Doom 64 please! It had unique models 🙏🏻😁
Is it just me or does doom eternal make the monsters from doom 2016 less scary and terrifying
Classic are more scary than the new CGI ones. They look like toys full of colors and lights
I prefer DOOM Eternal’s design for the Cyberdemon, Lost Souls and Mancubus. All others look better in DOOM 2016.
I like the older models better
2D sprites were way more scary to play against
I'm not even surprised that there are mods for doom 2. The same monsters but in better graphics. As with most games these days.
I dont like the fact monsters are more monotone in the new games. I like the colour from the originals.
The original doom designs were trying to make something scary with what little technology they had at the time and doom 2016 does the same (but with better tech this time), but doom eternal harkins back to the originals but just ends up looking more cartoonish and goofy and I can't say I like it over the 2016 version.
Blud defo got nostalgia goggles on for 2016💀. Eternal is way better 🥱
@@TheLawnMowingMan Nostalgia? I played it 5 years ago thats not nostalgia
@@TheLawnMowingMan Plus I actually like doom eternal more but I just like the art direction of 2016 more
@@feltycomic8558 yeah they does
@@feltycomic8558 I agree, 2016's art focused more on atmosphere and immersion while Eternal had a more arcade-ish direction hence the designs of the demons being sort of less detailed.
Doom 3 done dirty here
They made a right mess of the hell Knight
Doom Eternal models are still better imo. The game is not THAT serious now, it's more of an original feel
Yeah, 2016 models are kinda scarier, but still
5:15 song??
I like the art style of 2016 better even though Eternal respects the source material better. Everything from the DOOM guy down to the guns. I just like 2016 better, and I don't even play DOOM.
I hope Doom the dark ages includes all the variants of different demon types
Ich weis nicht warum, aber das alte Doom hat mich mehr gefesselt.
The cacodemon in the original doom is the best looking cacodemon they should use it in the modern one 😂
Its a matter of taste, but i personally love the Eternal looks more, because they have all the character that the original sprites did
2016 is definitrly trying to fit a more "cohesive" unitifed design, but it takes alot of the charm out, especially on the Soliders, Mancubus, Cyberdemon, ect
Some of the Doom 2016 monsters, like the revenant, look more realistic than the cartoonish look of some of Eternals enemies.. Not sure why the changes were even made.
No one cares what you think, most of Eternal’s designs are an upgrade
Doom 2016 monsters take first place without any doubts. Ethernal’s monsters look worse.
Terrible opinion
Classic doom just warms my heart really 😂
likely to be an unpopular opinion, but they really really dropped the ball on 2016 and Doom Eternal. The original designs are ambiguous in a way that feels genuinely uncanny and mysterious. The updated designs are not eerie at all they just look like monsters someone designed to look *cool* in a video game.
Some of the Eternal designs feel closer to their original essence but overall still run into the same problem.
They’re over-designed.
FromSoftware somehow avoids this issue when they design monsters for games. The artistry gap is huge.
Classic, Perfect, something between
People pay 60 and then 60 again for eternal and it's the exact same game xD it could be a dlc
doom 2016 did a great deal on makin the demons scary while eternal payed more homage to the original. i like the classic demon looks in eternal but overall the demons in 2016 are graciously designed
No Doom 3? Doom 1-2's monsters look much better with pixels rather than bilinear filterbulrring.
Mancubus is King Hippo on steroids.
I really prefer the classic look especailly for the baron and hell knight the more goat look to the originals just sits better with me.
Doom Eternal looks like 343 Industries developed it
The Tyrant is the only one where there is sufficient respect of the source material/monster. Disappointing.
I kinda wanted a Doom 3 comparison also.
How come they did not do the monster from doom 64 and doom 3