We Must Follow Collegium System Until Something New & Acceptable Replaces It: Former CJI UU Lalit

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ย. 2022
  • Support The Interview with Karan Thapar - fij.mojo.page/support-the-int...
    This 54-minute interview, done in two parts but presented as one, first explores at length a range of concerns about the working of the Collegium System. These concerns include its opacity, the scope it creates for nepotism, the fact that good candidates are often ignored and not elevated, the fact that inappropriate people often become judges and embarrass the Supreme Court, the fact that the author of the Collegium System, Justice Verma, changed his mind about the Collegium System and in 2004 said a National Judicial Commission would be preferable and, finally, if the Collegium is deemed to be perfect, which is Justice Lalit’s belief, the Supreme Court must fulfill all its requirements with clarity and, if necessary, toughness and this includes insisting that names reiterated for a second time are accepted by the government.
    Join The Wire's TH-cam Membership and get exclusive content, member-only emojis, live interaction with The Wire's founders, editors and reporters and much more. Memberships to The Wire Crew start at Rs 89/month. / @thewirenews

ความคิดเห็น • 248

  • @biologywithashesh6117
    @biologywithashesh6117 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    Karan Thapar never disappoint but what a humble former chief justice he is .

  • @nazeerbaig2430
    @nazeerbaig2430 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Justice was such a magnanimous person. He took questions with a brave heart and mind.

  • @VivekSingh-qu5vz
    @VivekSingh-qu5vz ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Wow! Debate at its best.... remarkable journalism from Karan Thapar and outstanding humbling and diplomatic answer by Justice Lalit.

  • @jayprashanth
    @jayprashanth ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Fantastic interview. Take a bow, Justice Lalit and Mr. Thapar.

  • @ashokmorwal5111
    @ashokmorwal5111 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    It's all going on with the peak of the knowledge. Both are the stalwarts like Himalaya and it's a great treat. Worth listening again and again...

  • @RAM_RAM_BHAIYO__
    @RAM_RAM_BHAIYO__ ปีที่แล้ว +6

    50 Families ruling SC
    Talented people left out to become CJI.
    People with no talent & wisdom coming to Judges.
    People with few Caste in system.
    No fair competition to chose CJI.
    just recommendation
    No representation of Majority Population.
    Gogoi went to RS
    Just. Misra praises Govt in power.
    But But But.... According to Just. Lalit COLLEGIUM SYSTEM IS PERFECT.
    Wow the institution which is given responsible for Justice is itself faulty. 👏👏👏👏👏

  • @sidkul2k
    @sidkul2k ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Happy to pay a subscription fee to Mr. Karan Thapar in addition to the wire subscription. His interviews are a learning experience in many different ways

  • @shangchi9644
    @shangchi9644 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Excellent interview! Great work Mr. Thapar, Keep going. 😊

  • @RajeshKumar-ob9zy
    @RajeshKumar-ob9zy ปีที่แล้ว +5

    1. Collegium system is Worst.
    2. No discussion on Accountability
    3. No discussion on Pathetic Performance and pending cases
    4. No discussion on Uncalled for, overreaching Observations

    • @pratikstark6696
      @pratikstark6696 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are running a modern,polished form of monarchy in the Supreme Court.
      99% of supreme court justices are the sons and daughters of justices or Advocates of High Courts or Supreme Court.
      The talents from the district courts retire in the districts and a handful of them get to the High Courts.. And that too for so brief period of time that they can't reach the apex court where the seats are reserved for the Rajkumars and Rajkumaris of the monarchy.

  • @shahwalkhan5908
    @shahwalkhan5908 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I learned a lot from this interview. Thanks!

  • @alokmishra2207
    @alokmishra2207 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    It’s a paradox Karan ! Seeking such transparency from judiciary while executive and media are nothing but opaque and blunt.
    I think collegium helps in upholding separation of power.

  • @deeshankd3
    @deeshankd3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Absolute brilliant journalism, absolutely brilliant CJI. Covered a lot in a short time in a fruitful manner.

  • @lalitgautam9118
    @lalitgautam9118 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Gem of an interview Justice Lalit and Karan Thapar both have absolute clarity over the choice of words. Pleasure to listen to the two🙌

  • @sambasivaraonimmagadda7705
    @sambasivaraonimmagadda7705 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good discussion. Ex CJI's replies are very were informed and balanced.
    Coming to the Judges appointments any system can have some imperfections and no system is perfect. Collegium system also may have some imperfections. But still it's better than the NJAC system. Some say there is transparency in collegium system. No system is fully transparent. In what other selections fulldetails are released to public.
    Separation of powers is paramount for democracy. If higher judiciary is also appointed by the executive then it would be compromised judiciary. Then people will suffer. That's why collegium system inspire of alleged imperfections may still be better than other presently proposed methods. If govt wants it can try to bring some improvements in the current system.

  • @kushalpawar..
    @kushalpawar.. ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dear Karan Sir.. You never spare anyone.. It's really a privilege to see your questionnaire to the invited guests..

  • @nomovie2022
    @nomovie2022 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    TQ so much dear respected former chief justice of India UU lalit ji 💐💐

  • @ashonics
    @ashonics ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Master piece of journalism

  • @kesari9852
    @kesari9852 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    At @20:07 of this video,when Justice U U Lalit was mentioning the criteria for the appointment of justices,he should have been allowed to complete listing all the criteria.However,he was interruped before that,when Mr.Thapar raised his argument over the viability of the first criteria Justice Lalit mentioned.This could have been avoided.This interruption from Mr.Thapar has deprived me as your viewer( i.e as a viewer of the wire) about learning on the criteria considered for appointment of judges.
    I'll appreciate if my view can be considered.

  • @ashonics
    @ashonics ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Phenomenal session...

  • @rafeeq2350
    @rafeeq2350 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent interview
    Good work by honarable Justice UU Lalit

  • @rajatraj3422
    @rajatraj3422 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    One of the best interviews by Thappar sir.

  • @somilgoel1624
    @somilgoel1624 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing! Just amazing! Such a privilege to witness class apart journalism in practice.

  • @veejayven
    @veejayven ปีที่แล้ว +2

    'When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean' - brilliant!

  • @thakur_ds
    @thakur_ds ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Terrific interview.

  • @adityabiswakarma5354
    @adityabiswakarma5354 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wished former CJI Justice Lalit had gotten a longer tenure.. the Supreme Court needs to address it's challenges. The independence of judiciary should also mean the independence of Judges.

  • @mharmaansheikh6388
    @mharmaansheikh6388 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just some thousand views on such an honest and valuable interview and lakhs of views on debates that can't even be called a debate clearly shows where our country is going

  • @123xyzabccba
    @123xyzabccba ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Indian judiciary is ridiculed for its decision in the case of Babri-RJB in which the judgement was given on the basis of faith as against evidences. Indian supreme court must be by far the only court in the world to hold this dubious record.

    • @vishnuprasad7574
      @vishnuprasad7574 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Bro there was evidence of Hindu structure
      Watch video of surveyors which publicly available in TH-cam
      What are you talking about decision was based belief and by the way it was land title issue

    • @123xyzabccba
      @123xyzabccba ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@vishnuprasad7574 : Babri was built on buddhist structure and the same was hidden by the govt ; all ancient hindu temples were built over buddhist n jains structures and most of the ancient masjids were built after destroying such hindu temples. The animosity between Buddhism and Bammanism is oldest on earth and dates back to over 3000 years…Buddhism was born out of its opposition to bammanical atrocities carried out in the name of the bammans invented caste-loving gods …

    • @garimabisht459
      @garimabisht459 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes the judgement has so many anomalies.
      It talked about demolition of babri masjid being a crime still no criminals behind bars and the scenario if the structure was not demolished would it be still possible to implement court's verdict??? NO

    • @garimabisht459
      @garimabisht459 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vishnuprasad7574 kaisi Anpado jaisi baat KR re ho ,mudda legal hai aur tum wahi aam aadmi ke emotions wali baat laa re ho beech mein.

    • @RahulSharma-jm9ir
      @RahulSharma-jm9ir ปีที่แล้ว

      @@123xyzabccba your source?

  • @mr.himanshukantale4511
    @mr.himanshukantale4511 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just an amazing interview 🙌

  • @kay--2
    @kay--2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interview of Justice Lalit is of the calibre that years back made me a fan of KT..but when bias steps in, the charm of purity is the first casualty and distaste sets in!
    The patience evident in Justice Lalit is exemplary and makes him a role model for most of us!
    Post interview, a question arise.. how can anybody or any collection go for godly self-promotion..that itself sounds as going against the rule of natural law!

  • @apoorvchauhan9852
    @apoorvchauhan9852 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Since Justice Lalit represented Hon'ble Minister Amit Shah, I thought he would favour the Government. However, he turned out to be a honest and upright CJI. It is pity that he served as CJI for only couple of months.

  • @danishchowdhury3994
    @danishchowdhury3994 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Justice Lalit your values are an inspiration for all.

  • @krishnakumarmishra8144
    @krishnakumarmishra8144 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why should judges of collegium system should waste valuable time in selecting judges of High court and supreme courts, instead of deciding the pending cases.

  • @AjayKumar-qg6jm
    @AjayKumar-qg6jm ปีที่แล้ว

    Always great to listen CJI UU Lalit. Very meaningful to me

  • @TKPal278
    @TKPal278 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent interview

  • @hareshgaglani2955
    @hareshgaglani2955 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Mr Thapar, this was a brilliant interview! Against a legal luminary of the calibre of the ex-CJI, not only have you held your own but very incisively brought out the real issues in this NJAC vs Collegium debate, enlightening the viewers, without ruffling his feathers! To his credit, he has responded to your intense grilling patiently and as candidly as possible! Excellent jugalbandi!

  • @ranjanjoshi3454
    @ranjanjoshi3454 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We need to create Indian Constitution and judicial system literacy in the society. It should percolate…

  • @nitinchaudhary9723
    @nitinchaudhary9723 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Interesting interview to watch 😉

  • @mahendrachandak1406
    @mahendrachandak1406 ปีที่แล้ว

    great .kudos for the way it was conducted and hats off to former CJI U U Lalitji

  • @SenthilKumar-zx5lu
    @SenthilKumar-zx5lu ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The best interview by intellectuals and worth listening; learning

  • @kartikrajeshshah
    @kartikrajeshshah ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb Interview

  • @HumanBeingsRThinkingBeings
    @HumanBeingsRThinkingBeings ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Mind Begs the Question:
    If under a PM/Govt
    Judges removed,murdered
    If Judgement not Favorable
    Judiciary - not Pressured,Pressured?

  • @trueman6152
    @trueman6152 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow!what a interview

  • @sridharsami209
    @sridharsami209 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fitting response to govt

  • @shubhamehta4574
    @shubhamehta4574 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    प्रशंसनीय संवाद.... जय भारत

  • @zubin67
    @zubin67 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    CJI U. U. Lalit calling Karan - "Sir", is a mark of a true public servant.

    • @IamRanJos
      @IamRanJos ปีที่แล้ว

      100 percent. While the journalist has never bothered once to call the ex CJI as sir

  • @vijaysingh-vi8lk
    @vijaysingh-vi8lk ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm Sold to Shri Thapar, Morally for his extremely brilliantly logical views/interview with former CJI UULalit.
    An excellent and
    Apt application of the Dictionary meaning of the word CUNSULTATION vis a vis CONCURRENCE.
    How true " Judges
    are NOT the masters of Language ".
    The issue of correct interpretation/meaning of the impugned word must be sorted out either by SC or Parliament sooner than later.

  • @akshaypandey2495
    @akshaypandey2495 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic 💖 Gold 👌

  • @usmanganipatel2302
    @usmanganipatel2302 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Karan thapper one the best and genuine journalist..

  • @fredashah6873
    @fredashah6873 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting conversation. Throughout the march of time, human beings have tried to create perfect systems of governance for dealing justly with the affairs of state and its citizens. But systems can only be as good as the people in charge of them, and the human creature is fallible and prone to err. Of course, some individuals have proved themselves to be morally and intellectually superior to others, but attainment of perfection in any area of activity in this world is impossible. Yet, our attempts and ambitions to create utopia will continue. Such is life !

  • @rayyappananjalose4925
    @rayyappananjalose4925 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great interview. Apart from the content, the language used by Karan Thapar, as always and that of the former CJI Lalit is a feast

  • @KingRockport
    @KingRockport ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Karan Thapar with ex CJI U U Lalit. My eyes lit up when i saw the notification. Kudos to Honourable Justice and Mr Thapar for this gem.

  • @girdharipardasani2328
    @girdharipardasani2328 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mr.Karan Thapar, have watched your interview. Its very interesting n enlightening. Thank you so much.

  • @manthramurthy7549
    @manthramurthy7549 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Karan thapper please question Sonia Gandhi about 2G, Commonwealth games, coalgate, etc etc

  • @ashisd5705
    @ashisd5705 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The process of selection and the promotion in judiciary in India is flawed and rigged. Specially the collegium system . It needs to change immediately. Why not assess any judge after every 10 judgements he makes ? If it’s found out that majority of his judgements are changed in the higher courts - does not it say that he is not capable of being a judge ? No accountability? What is this? ?? Why the SC does not allow a nation wide competitive test to be a judge just like any civil services test, of course with few years of practice behind . And one more needs to be added - psychological tests such as Aptitude tests. Why not transparency on their assets? Should they not be assessed in every few years and fired if not you to satisfaction - coded criteria to be decided

    • @pratikstark6696
      @pratikstark6696 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are running a modern,polished form of monarchy.
      99% of supreme court justices are the sons and daughters of justices or Advocates of High Courts or Supreme Court.
      The talents from the district courts retire in the districts and a handful of them get to the High Courts.. And that too for so brief period of time that they can't reach the apex court where the seats are reserved for the Rajkumars and Rajkumaris of the monarchy.

  • @skpaanda
    @skpaanda ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting interview!

  • @SachinYadav-pg8fm
    @SachinYadav-pg8fm ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks Karan for this interview

  • @roshanmeena3209
    @roshanmeena3209 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very good Journalist 🌾 🙏

  • @samajikpahal7056
    @samajikpahal7056 ปีที่แล้ว

    थापर साहब! इस इंटरव्यू को हिंदी में भी प्रकाशित कराएं ताकि आमलोग भी इसका लाभ उठा सकें। धनवाद। बहुत बढ़िया।

  • @patahe7036
    @patahe7036 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lalit sir deserves longer tenure...He is crystal clear in his thoughts 🧡

  • @Bhavya_rm
    @Bhavya_rm ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It is very unfortunate that such Judge like UU Lalit were our CJI for a very short period. This is unfair and it is the right time to evolve a new system for tenure as said by AP Shah "fixed tenure based on Seniority"

  • @abhijeet60
    @abhijeet60 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Any institution which does not have a reservation, then it is fully reserved for upper-caste people with some nominal exceptions to show the diversity

  • @surajgururani9935
    @surajgururani9935 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Both interviews one with justice Shah and the other with the former CJI were very nice.

  • @MdMozammelHossain
    @MdMozammelHossain ปีที่แล้ว +1

    it was an enlightening interview.

  • @rickyabraham2220
    @rickyabraham2220 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The combined IQ in that frame is unbelievable!! It's such a blessing to be able to witness this!!

    • @Vivek10010
      @Vivek10010 ปีที่แล้ว

      combined IQ of 4?

  • @siddharthrao7k
    @siddharthrao7k ปีที่แล้ว

    finally, an interview thats been conducted without patent bias!

  • @roshanchoudhary9909
    @roshanchoudhary9909 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🙏Great Job,Keep it Up

  • @GreatMan_from_East
    @GreatMan_from_East ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Man I want calmness like UU Lalit

  • @sanjaygadhalay1523
    @sanjaygadhalay1523 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you.

  • @123xyzabccba
    @123xyzabccba ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Indian judiciary is the most un-diversified judiciary in the world. The minority bammans are found disproportionately high in higher judiciary and the resultant mess is there for all to see; communal, caste biases are a given. What else can happen when ppl from castes known for lack of judicial character and integrity dominate the judiciary. The collegium system perpetuates the casteist character of the judiciary because of ample scope for cronyism. The anti egalitarian character of the indian judiciary got exposed when it deliberately fixed the cap of 50% to reservations when it came to giving reservations to obc’s but when it came to extending reservations to their caste-cronies under EWS they blatantly removed the cap of 50%. It’s high time every castes and community gets a fair share of representation in the indian judiciary in the interest of justice …..

  • @sidharth6199
    @sidharth6199 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @vinaysinha7598
    @vinaysinha7598 ปีที่แล้ว

    1. In several High Courts some lawyer(s) is/are more influential than others and the capacity to influence derives its strength from family background, proximity to Senior judge(s), and some time financial capacity. Collegium system encourages this nepotism.
    2. Some of the nominated judges may have their family' s interest in some business such as running unrecognised medical/engineering /law colleges etc. Collegium does not have access to such irregularities and Govt in executive has such secret data and Govt should have the power to disagree with the recommendations of Collegium.
    An excellent discussion by Karan. Hats off to you.

  • @Pradreamschasers
    @Pradreamschasers ปีที่แล้ว +1

    उदय उमेश लळीत सरांना ऐकणं नेहमीच प्रेरणादायी असत.

  • @jamestucker1068
    @jamestucker1068 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    See the list some current & ex CJIs most are from politico -legal families
    Justice TS Thakur : Son of J&K HC Judge
    Justice RM Lodha : Son of Rajasthan HC Judge
    Justice A Kabir : Son of Congress Politician & Ex-Minister in WB Government
    In Chief Justices of High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Justice DY Chandrachud : Son of CJI YV Chandrachud
    Chennai High Court
    Justice SK Kaul : Great-Grandson of J&K Finance Minister & Brother of Judge in Delhi HC
    Gujarat High Court
    Justice JB Pardiwala : Son of Gujarat Assembly Speaker
    Supreme Court
    Justice UU Lalit: Son of Bombay HC Judge
    Justice R Gogoi: Son of Assam Ex-CM
    Justice RF Nariman : Son of Ex-Solicitor General
    Justice PC Ghose : Son of Ex CJ of Calcutta HC

  • @muruganr3092
    @muruganr3092 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a Extraordinary person of Mr Lalit how patience he has in listening and answering.

  • @mr.x3167
    @mr.x3167 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wish, Justice U.U. Lalit could have been CJI for more time.

  • @thegopaljha
    @thegopaljha ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant interview

  • @akshatnikam5032
    @akshatnikam5032 ปีที่แล้ว

    the torch bearers of press and judiciary is talking ... very important suggestion comes out and should be implemented ASAP... INSTITUTIONALIZE the process is answers of most questions... thanks the wire... Indians are with you , independent press and judiciary!
    CONSTITUTION and civil liberties must survive ...

  • @akz2251
    @akz2251 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Oh my judge Loya, no one stood by you. Judiciary is gone with Loya, like gone with the wind. Yeah they always speak great after retirement.

  • @user-to1jq5sd7y
    @user-to1jq5sd7y ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome

  • @abhilash4479
    @abhilash4479 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There were very high moments in this interview.. " even God can't turn the clock back how will SC" , Justice lalit leaved an impact in so less time which many CJIs didn't even with lots of time.. A judge with a spine, wish he stayed in court for longer.. It would hv benefited common citizen.. As justice said at end "I enjoyed the talk", so did I.. ❣️❤️

  • @nainsingh472
    @nainsingh472 ปีที่แล้ว

    Karan Thapar is one of the best journals who put questions fearlessly. 👏

  • @sandeepchoudhury7522
    @sandeepchoudhury7522 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Master of the roster's selected bench cancelled GN Saibaba's bail. And AM's advocate UU Lalit is an honourable man 👨

  • @NoGodButTheGod
    @NoGodButTheGod ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Pls donate, ever drop counts!

  • @AK-ok2jh
    @AK-ok2jh ปีที่แล้ว

    Karan Thapar, you are just awesome, I can listen you hours and hours

  • @vaneetgupta2828
    @vaneetgupta2828 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All corruption cases should not be listed in judiciary which is also suffering from malaise of corruption. Swift and corruption free independent system should be on lines of lokayukta. Then only few cases will be left.

  • @azimzaheer3508
    @azimzaheer3508 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Supreme court is the custodian of the constitution
    Independent working of the supreme court is the essence of healthy democracy
    Political interference hampers the working of supreme court and it should be checked strictly
    Independent working of the supreme court should be supported by all parties concerned for quality juidice prudence

  • @hsworldview8075
    @hsworldview8075 ปีที่แล้ว

    Because it benefits such people who get to appoint judges without any responsibility to anyone.

  • @navigator5375
    @navigator5375 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    MAN KARAN THAPAR IS LEGEND WHEN IT COMES TO TAKING INTERVIEW

  • @anubhavkarbhowmik
    @anubhavkarbhowmik ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There is a factual error by lordship at 26:20. Justice Kureshi had not retired when the next meeting of the collegium took place in which 9 judges had been elevated to the Supreme court.

  • @123xyzabccba
    @123xyzabccba ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Supreme Court benches shld be established in all four zones of india so that it becomes convenient to the citizens to approach the Court …

    • @HAPPYSINGH-er5dj
      @HAPPYSINGH-er5dj ปีที่แล้ว

      Now it will be done, as now virtual Court proceedings has diminished the idea.

  • @vardhan6864
    @vardhan6864 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome Karan Thapar sir

  • @nraomadas2065
    @nraomadas2065 ปีที่แล้ว

    Appreciate

  • @janmejaysingh9218
    @janmejaysingh9218 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Let talented minds quarrel, so that average minds can live. What's the use of a perfect state when it is not interested in public?

  • @chandubai
    @chandubai ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a composed well conducted interview 👏 👍

  • @Dev-pe2sz
    @Dev-pe2sz ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The ex CJI has been very honest in this interview I must say…

  • @nikkhilkalia4512
    @nikkhilkalia4512 ปีที่แล้ว

    Karan is a fantastic interviewer. He is so sharp.
    There is just one thing that bothers me - he keeps his hand raised, showing impatience. That is uncomfortable for me to watch as a viewer. It can be disrespectful to the interviewee as well.

  • @sachinwaghmare210
    @sachinwaghmare210 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Apke sawalo se darr kar modi Bhaga tha isliye apko sslam

  • @rajankorgaonkar6833
    @rajankorgaonkar6833 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mr.U.U.Lalit former CJI, please educated me how Bail given Kejriwal for Compaignig for election,is it as per constitution of as per judges wishes and to become stronger than Constitution and Country existing law judges like U.U.Latit support collegium systems.

  • @shatjingshai9289
    @shatjingshai9289 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why don't you interview the "famous" politicians??

  • @absolute7433
    @absolute7433 ปีที่แล้ว

    Commendable deliberation. Protection of Fundamental rights is much more significant than master of roster issue, and certainly, fast and deliberative method of judgement must be used to clear the cases.