The contrast. German commentators are saying, "How wonderful it is for Germany to finally have a world champion. We came close with Stefan Bellof before his tragedy." English commentators are saying, "It's a shame that it ended like this but Michael Schumacher is world champion."
Yes, a wonderful genius on wheels. Always clean wins, superb car control, impecably timed attacks, expert at slipstreaming, brave moves that usually didn't endanger others. A true sportsman.
@@andredeketeleastutecomplex 1986 tyre blow out Australia, so, so, so very close to his first championship win, 1987 he broke his back with 4 retirements, still nearly won, 1988 normally aspirated engine no chance, 1989 Ferrari gearbox 9 DSQ/retirements,1990 usually ferrari gearbox 9 retirements 2 of which were no finishes past 90% distance, so no chance! 1991 he had 6 retirements/DSQ and against superior McClaren but still nearly won.1992 finally won in a superior car, totally deserved a win and won Indy car the same year , a double world champion age 39-40? He should have won 5+ championships even back in those days when cars did have a tendency to fail. Mansell also won the masters series where all cars were the same design and used the same parts.
@@sbaxter4207 Yup, him and Raikkonen are sometimes overlooked because they have 1 World Title when they don’t realize Mansell should have won atleast 3 and Kimi came close in ‘03 and ‘05
@@housesports000 They resembled each other in driving style too actually in large aspects. Mansell and Raikkonen are very similar parallels. Kimi’s peak was higher, but Mansell was a bit more consistent in his career. To be fair to Kimi, Mansell had some absolutely rapid Williams cars, Raikkonen only arguably had the fastest car in his prime once (2005)
una carriera meravigliosa, indissolubilmente legata alla Williams, nell'apotesi del successo con la FW14B del 1992. Grande Leone d'Inghilterra, red five!!!!
1986 tyre blow out Australia so, so, so very close to his first championship win, 1987 broke his back 4 retirements, still nearly won, 1988 normally aspirated engine no chance, 1989 Ferrari gearbox 7 retirements,1990 ferrari gearbox again 7 retirements, no chance! 1991 he had 5 retirements and against superior McClaren but still nearly won.1992 finally won in a superior car totally deserved a win and won indy car the same year, a double world champion age 39-40? He should have won 5+ f1 championships even back in those days when cars did have a tendency to fail. Mansell won the masters series where all cars were the same design and used the same parts.
Without getting into the debate over cheating, I would dispute that the 1994 Williams was a dog. True, it might have been inferior to the Benetton at the start of the season, but let's remember, Senna still put it on pole in all three races he started. Damon Hill won a number of races in it and came within a broken wishbone of winning the championship. I was a Hill fan but I wouldn't suggest for a moment that he was anywhere near as good a driver as Schumacher. So the FW16 can't have been bad.
Yeah, he drove the races that didn't collide with his IndyCar races, the ones he couldn't drive was driven by David Coulthard. Then Mansell signed with McLaren for 1995, when Williams decide to keep Coulthard, but he only drove two races before retirering from F1.
The reason for all of this is that the car got better later in the season. It was not a crap, though, in the three opening races, but you have to remember the difference between Senna and Hill was enormous. In Brazil, Hill got lapped by Senna, and in all three qualifying sessions, Senna (and Schumacher) were ahead of Hill by another enormous difference. The fact that Hill was on Schumacher´s pace by the end of the season points to the fact that the car got better amidst the season.
Senna had his superlicense revoked after suzuka in '89, Hamilton has had multiple penalties for cutting the track and overtaking, as has Alonso. Schumachers DSQ from the '97 was a knee jerk reaction, considering what had happened in 1989 and 1990 where Senna and Prost had very dubious incidents, and, in Senna's case in '90 he said before the race he would take Prost out..
"Mansell gewinnt vor Berger, Brundle, dritter wird Rubens Barrichello" ;D bis drei zu zählen kann manchmal verdammt schwer sein, wenn man Heiko Waßer heißt ;)
Red 5 had a huge set of bollocks. The only problem is he also had a huge chip on his shoulder. One of the few F1 racers who was not intimidated by Senna.
And after 2 years out matched Damon Hill in qualifying, yet Murray Walker put Hill above Mansell in his best list. Mind you Walker always made mistakes.
@@shaunsimpson9902 I'd say Mansell had the edge on Hill. Hill was a solid driver who could get the best out of a decent car. However, he came up short of Mansell when it came to 'dogfighting' on the track.
Non of the drivers u named was ever punished for unsportsmanlike conduct. Schumacher was... twice actually. And on the second one he got punished for a collision with Villeneuve and was disqualified from the Drivers' Championship. Schumacher's 1997 Drivers Championship position: DSQ ... nothing dubious about it!!
@atomicR4GER yeah sure everyone cheated as blatent as schumacher right? ramming right into him... and then has the nerve to do it to villeneueve.... way to go to defending ure hero.... what a hero.
watch senna v martin brundle formula2 -senna maniac driving -James Hunt was crazy driver before getting to F1 but he learned fron his crashes getting to the top -it seems senna never learned, hence Jackie Stewart interview with senna YOU WILL NOT WANT TO GO INTO! -as you know the ANSWER! -but once you are pointed out totally wrong, you wait for the comments to come in, until THE TRUTH is a long SCROLL DOWN!
Every single driver worth their salt in F1 (or any other motorsport) have done things on track that can be considered dubious. That does not make them a cheater, and there are two sides to every story, two cars at least in every accident. The word "cheat" is overused, nowhere more so than in Motorsport.
A cheat. Not a cheater. Dubious? you mean unfair, or unsportsmanlike. Go back far enough and you won't find those sorts of 'sportsmen'. On the contrary, any driver worth his salt, just doesn't drive in an unsportsmanlike manner. Doesn't need to. Cheats are a sign of an unworthy competitor.
By the way, the car was not repported by Senna and Hill as intrinsecaly bad, but it is said to have had an unpredictable behaviour e to have big flaws, mainly because of the lack of active suspension working for Newey´s aerodynamic design. Search for the March of late 80´s, a car designed by Newey, atonishingly fast on some tracks and completely bizarre at bumpy surfaces.
Yeah well difference is Schumi and Benetton were in so much controversy already during the season especially with the team and the car while for Senna and Prost the controversy was more between them rather than the entire team
Willams might have lost a drivers title that day, but they had one of the best drivers beat the rest of the grid fair and square that day. Nigel was a madman.
Should have been enough to get him a drive in 95 with Williams but when rookie Coulthard chosen instead was a bit bizarre especially as his results were not as good as Mansells in the races he competed in.. I don't think Mansell would have won the title in 95 in the Williams but I do believe he would have run Schumacher a bit closer...
@portugalfan10 If Schumacher is a "fucking cheater" then so are Prost, Senna, Hamilton and Alonso as all have done dubious things and won a championship
@deperer Well people seem to forget that Senna deliberately took Prost out to win the championship, but it's ok for Senna the "god" of F1 to do it right? The only reason people hate Schumacher and call him a cheat is because he won so much and try to accuse him of cheating. When you look at both the JV and DH incidents WITHOUT bias or hatred you will see that both are racing incidents. But of course you won't look at these incidents without bias and hatred..
The FIA should amend the 1994 season result, remove schumacher from the points table and give Damon Hill the title. schumacher the dirty cheat turned in on Hill and stole the title. He had hit the wall only moments earlier and knew very well that he was going to lose the title, so he took Hill out. If something like this happened today, the driver in question would be excluded from the standings immediately. Unfortunately for Hill, the standards back in the 90's were appalling.
I think you cant blame Vettel in the 2011 season for anything like "cheating" .. he was just so far superior to the rest as was his car in that year ;) then again you might think its cheating to win in the best car. That would fit for Button though too :D
So, the 1994 Williams was fast after all...when driven by a good driver? In the meanwhile a whole frickin' country is "mourning" 1 dude... Come on, man! "Waaaah, waaaah, we can't live without him... waaah!" Losers!
Why was there openings in the engine covers? If you look at some of the other cars like the mclaren the overhead intake goes right through?? What did they ban airboxes after imola too?
They opened the airbox to reduce the air pressure going into the engines and try to reduce the power, bit of a knee jerk reaction to Sennas death considering it was blind luck that shrapnel hit him in the head following his crash.
Das war für mich gerade die Zeitenwende. Davor war F1 auf RTL ansehnlich mit Knupp & Rosberg. Dann kam Heiko Wasser - so ein schleimig-glattgebügelt wirkender Reporter - und es ging den Bach runter. Dass Schumi serienweise F1-WM wurde, weil die alte Garde (Senna, Mansell, Prost) weg war, tat ihr übriges.
OK... so he pushed Montoya wide at Imola in '04? he had the right of way! I've seen just about every driver in F1 pass someone and squeeze the car on the outside wide on the exit. The move on Frentzen on the exit of the pits was dirty, yes.. but he got a penalty which almost lost him the race anyway, so how is it an issue? He ignored black flags.. he got DQ'd so again, why is it an issue? Monaco '06.. did you see what happened in '07 to Massa and Kimi? Obviously not..
I call BS, Hamilton has been penalised multiple times for things that fall under "unsportsmen like conduct", and lets not forget that Senna was DSQ from Suzuka '89 for short cutting the track, and subsequently banned for 6 months. That penalty may have smacked with bias, but why does that make it any different from any penalty received by Schumacher or anyone. All drivers push the limits, and Schumacher is no better or worse than Senna, Prost et al in that regard.
So it's OK for Senna who said that he would (and did) DELIBERATELY TAKE A RIVAL CAR win a championship, but not for Schumacher? Because Senna's incident with Prost at turn 1 was in now way a "normal racing incident." Regarding the TC on the Benetton, other than someone who was selling one of the cars saying it had TC do you have any other proof? because if it had TC i'm 100% sure the british media would've uncovered it, it didn't have TC, end of. TBC..
That is the point he's making. Hill should have won in 1994. Schumacher knew he damaged his car and his race was over after he went off and hit the wall, so he deliberately drove into Hill. People deny it all the time, but look at the footage (watch?v=91JoW4mSiZo), he knew Hill was there, you can see Schumacher looking at Hill in his mirror, he then turns into the corner suddenly and sharply. It was 100% deliberate.
Luewarm. Strange how Schumacher turned right when the corner went to the right, he could not control what Hill did, Hill tried to overtake in the corner and even Hill has said he should have waited for a better place to pass. There are idiots who try to say that Prost deliberately turned into Senna in 1989. The driver in front has the right to take the line into the corner, it is up to the driver behind to make a safe pass.
Stop the debate about senna and schumacher.both of them are cheater (senna in 1990,89,88 etc, and schumacher in 1994 etc) i love them but i can't deny that they have terrible approach to steal WDC
+Mohammad Bimoseno Senna cheated in 90, was cheated in 89 and what is the point about 88? I agree about Schumacher and Senna, but Prost ain't a saint too.
Prost should have been called the winer lol watch the Senna movie you find out all the behind the scene things I'm laughing so hard at what the previous guy wrote...
Senna movie was too bias i think. You need to read Senna vs Prost by Malcolm Folley. It's more objective because Folley make an interview with driver / F1 Expert from Senna's era. The movie just covered the good side of Senna, and discredit Prost and Schumacher
First of all, Senna is not a cheater, neither is Hamilton, neither is Prost - and neither is Schumacher. I think the point R4GER was making is that you can't call Schumacher a cheat without also calling the others cheats. As for Senna, stopping a winning strike? That '94 Williams was a dog, add to that, he'd been beaten to the title in '92 & '93 - I'm not saying he wasn't great, but he was a mortal, just like the rest of them, capable of being beaten by superior cars/drivers. Fanboi much?
You can't not call Senna a cheater. Don't you have a little respect?!?!?!?!?! Senna was a comet from another world, he was so talented that he could never think for cheating. He's death stop he's winnig strike. If Senna was abble to survive, the other pilots will probably never have the opportunity to win! Schumacher IS A CHEATER!!! I have seen all of his races. Except the 7 world championships, i will remember him as a fucking cheater. So please stop writing bullshits and think a little bit.
It doesn't matter how many times he did it, he DELIBERATELY took another driver out, and, while contentious Prost didn't deliberately take out Senna the year before, Senna after that incident should've been banned for the next season at the least. Benetton got penalised heavily for the fuel rig incident and once again someone brings up the issue of Benetton having TC and/or LC on their cars.. did you know Ferrari ALSO had such software.. but they didn't beat Senna or Hill so no one cares...
So...Ayrton Senna got murdered and these people celebrated to reafirm the "iluminatti" business would go on, with the (next Top team) two Ferrari's right behind Mansell. Not only that, but they did a bunch of other dirty jokes dancing samba on humans rights face. Because Senna was really murdered.
41 years old. One of the all time greats
I adored Mansell, he was childhood hero and a fellow Brummie :)
Mansell....real hero
mansell's a boss.
The contrast.
German commentators are saying, "How wonderful it is for Germany to finally have a world champion. We came close with Stefan Bellof before his tragedy."
English commentators are saying, "It's a shame that it ended like this but Michael Schumacher is world champion."
Dude, i agree with the english ones. I wanted Senna to be there and win the 4th one ;(
Yeah because he was a cheater and that other piece of trash!
Senna died because of that launch control and that piece of trash! Karma gets both of them
@@callumcc8897 Senna died because he was an idiot who couldn't drive the Williams properly.
Mansell would have won 1994 championship as easily as 1992. He was the best!
Definitely not!
@@DaRemy definitely yes
He wasn't the best
Greetings from Germany. He would had beat our Michael in 1994
@@Prince_Vegeta_BMW Thanks 🙂 He knew how to handle the Williams better than anybody else.
Mansell. Genius.
Yes, a wonderful genius on wheels. Always clean wins, superb car control, impecably timed attacks, expert at slipstreaming, brave moves that usually didn't endanger others. A true sportsman.
@@andredeketeleastutecomplex 1986 tyre blow out Australia, so, so, so very close to his first championship win, 1987 he broke his back with 4 retirements, still nearly won, 1988 normally aspirated engine no chance, 1989 Ferrari gearbox 9 DSQ/retirements,1990 usually ferrari gearbox 9 retirements 2 of which were no finishes past 90% distance, so no chance! 1991 he had 6 retirements/DSQ and against superior McClaren but still nearly won.1992 finally won in a superior car, totally deserved a win and won Indy car the same year , a double world champion age 39-40? He should have won 5+ championships even back in those days when cars did have a tendency to fail. Mansell also won the masters series where all cars were the same design and used the same parts.
@@sbaxter4207 Good knowledge and spot on assessment.
@@sbaxter4207 Yup, him and Raikkonen are sometimes overlooked because they have 1 World Title when they don’t realize Mansell should have won atleast 3 and Kimi came close in ‘03 and ‘05
@@housesports000 They resembled each other in driving style too actually in large aspects. Mansell and Raikkonen are very similar parallels. Kimi’s peak was higher, but Mansell was a bit more consistent in his career. To be fair to Kimi, Mansell had some absolutely rapid Williams cars, Raikkonen only arguably had the fastest car in his prime once (2005)
una carriera meravigliosa, indissolubilmente legata alla Williams, nell'apotesi del successo con la FW14B del 1992. Grande Leone d'Inghilterra, red five!!!!
Legend!
1986 tyre blow out Australia so, so, so very close to his first championship win, 1987 broke his back 4 retirements, still nearly won, 1988 normally aspirated engine no chance, 1989 Ferrari gearbox 7 retirements,1990 ferrari gearbox again 7 retirements, no chance! 1991 he had 5 retirements and against superior McClaren but still nearly won.1992 finally won in a superior car totally deserved a win and won indy car the same year, a double world champion age 39-40? He should have won 5+ f1 championships even back in those days when cars did have a tendency to fail. Mansell won the masters series where all cars were the same design and used the same parts.
This Flagman is the best...
Without getting into the debate over cheating, I would dispute that the 1994 Williams was a dog. True, it might have been inferior to the Benetton at the start of the season, but let's remember, Senna still put it on pole in all three races he started. Damon Hill won a number of races in it and came within a broken wishbone of winning the championship. I was a Hill fan but I wouldn't suggest for a moment that he was anywhere near as good a driver as Schumacher. So the FW16 can't have been bad.
end of era can easily be the name of this video
Well said.
LOL. Every one of the all time greats has done something controversial. I wouldn't be pointing my finger at anyone.
in my opinion indycars actually looked better than f1 cars in this particular year. this was probably the last time they did though.
The first and last win for Nigel was with Williams team.
Too right,but dont forget Gehard bergers win in Germany in 97.Its not like that anymore.They are now boys,not men.
Yeah, he drove the races that didn't collide with his IndyCar races, the ones he couldn't drive was driven by David Coulthard. Then Mansell signed with McLaren for 1995, when Williams decide to keep Coulthard, but he only drove two races before retirering from F1.
The reason for all of this is that the car got better later in the season. It was not a crap, though, in the three opening races, but you have to remember the difference between Senna and Hill was enormous. In Brazil, Hill got lapped by Senna, and in all three qualifying sessions, Senna (and Schumacher) were ahead of Hill by another enormous difference. The fact that Hill was on Schumacher´s pace by the end of the season points to the fact that the car got better amidst the season.
Well said!!!
Senna had his superlicense revoked after suzuka in '89, Hamilton has had multiple penalties for cutting the track and overtaking, as has Alonso. Schumachers DSQ from the '97 was a knee jerk reaction, considering what had happened in 1989 and 1990 where Senna and Prost had very dubious incidents, and, in Senna's case in '90 he said before the race he would take Prost out..
A superlativ champion Nigel Mansell
"Mansell gewinnt vor Berger, Brundle, dritter wird Rubens Barrichello" ;D bis drei zu zählen kann manchmal verdammt schwer sein, wenn man Heiko Waßer heißt ;)
Red 5 had a huge set of bollocks. The only problem is he also had a huge chip on his shoulder. One of the few F1 racers who was not intimidated by Senna.
I didn't know that Masell return to race in F1 in 1994.
Due to Senna’s death . it was Senna's car.
And after 2 years out matched Damon Hill in qualifying, yet Murray Walker put Hill above Mansell in his best list. Mind you Walker always made mistakes.
@@shaunsimpson9902 I'd say Mansell had the edge on Hill. Hill was a solid driver who could get the best out of a decent car. However, he came up short of Mansell when it came to 'dogfighting' on the track.
Should have retired on top, and went onto a long IndyCar career.
Non of the drivers u named was ever punished for unsportsmanlike conduct. Schumacher was... twice actually. And on the second one he got punished for a collision with Villeneuve and was disqualified from the Drivers' Championship. Schumacher's 1997 Drivers Championship position: DSQ ... nothing dubious about it!!
@atomicR4GER yeah sure everyone cheated as blatent as schumacher right? ramming right into him... and then has the nerve to do it to villeneueve.... way to go to defending ure hero.... what a hero.
Ill preffer one title of mansell.hill.and villeneuve.knewing they do it fine before 7 in doubt
watch senna v martin brundle formula2 -senna maniac driving
-James Hunt was crazy driver before getting to F1 but he learned fron his crashes getting to the top -it seems senna never learned, hence Jackie Stewart interview with senna YOU WILL NOT WANT TO GO INTO!
-as you know the ANSWER!
-but once you are pointed out totally wrong, you wait for the comments to come in, until THE TRUTH is a long SCROLL DOWN!
Nigel Mansell " Mr Red Number "
Schumacher is the best fact! Look at the stats!
Every single driver worth their salt in F1 (or any other motorsport) have done things on track that can be considered dubious. That does not make them a cheater, and there are two sides to every story, two cars at least in every accident. The word "cheat" is overused, nowhere more so than in Motorsport.
A cheat. Not a cheater. Dubious? you mean unfair, or unsportsmanlike. Go back far enough and you won't find those sorts of 'sportsmen'. On the contrary, any driver worth his salt, just doesn't drive in an unsportsmanlike manner. Doesn't need to. Cheats are a sign of an unworthy competitor.
By the way, the car was not repported by Senna and Hill as intrinsecaly bad, but it is said to have had an unpredictable behaviour e to have big flaws, mainly because of the lack of active suspension working for Newey´s aerodynamic design. Search for the March of late 80´s, a car designed by Newey, atonishingly fast on some tracks and completely bizarre at bumpy surfaces.
Whats with Senna 1990 or Prost 1989? If you call Schumi a cheater,dont forget the others
Yeah well difference is Schumi and Benetton were in so much controversy already during the season especially with the team and the car while for Senna and Prost the controversy was more between them rather than the entire team
Senna liked Coulthard but Williams wanted constructors title. Mansell not quite the best but most awesome.
Willams might have lost a drivers title that day, but they had one of the best drivers beat the rest of the grid fair and square that day. Nigel was a madman.
Should have been enough to get him a drive in 95 with Williams but when rookie Coulthard chosen instead was a bit bizarre especially as his results were not as good as Mansells in the races he competed in.. I don't think Mansell would have won the title in 95 in the Williams but I do believe he would have run Schumacher a bit closer...
@portugalfan10 If Schumacher is a "fucking cheater" then so are Prost, Senna, Hamilton and Alonso as all have done dubious things and won a championship
@flipsidedogchop As did Senna and Hamilton and Prost...
i dont even remmeber mansell racing in f1 in 94. did he replace senna?
Because Senna is dead in Imola 1994
@deperer Well people seem to forget that Senna deliberately took Prost out to win the championship, but it's ok for Senna the "god" of F1 to do it right? The only reason people hate Schumacher and call him a cheat is because he won so much and try to accuse him of cheating. When you look at both the JV and DH incidents WITHOUT bias or hatred you will see that both are racing incidents. But of course you won't look at these incidents without bias and hatred..
What's a JV and DH incident?
The FIA should amend the 1994 season result, remove schumacher from the points table and give Damon Hill the title. schumacher the dirty cheat turned in on Hill and stole the title. He had hit the wall only moments earlier and knew very well that he was going to lose the title, so he took Hill out.
If something like this happened today, the driver in question would be excluded from the standings immediately. Unfortunately for Hill, the standards back in the 90's were appalling.
Schumacher is a legend of the sport.
I think you cant blame Vettel in the 2011 season for anything like "cheating" .. he was just so far superior to the rest as was his car in that year ;) then again you might think its cheating to win in the best car. That would fit for Button though too :D
Button's car wasn't anyway as superior as Vettel's. Button was a hell of a driver.
So, the 1994 Williams was fast after all...when driven by a good driver? In the meanwhile a whole frickin' country is "mourning" 1 dude... Come on, man!
"Waaaah, waaaah, we can't live without him... waaah!" Losers!
defend the driver, not the stats
Why was there openings in the engine covers? If you look at some of the other cars like the mclaren the overhead intake goes right through?? What did they ban airboxes after imola too?
Yeah, it was a new regulation after Imola. I don't know the technical aspects of those though.
They opened the airbox to reduce the air pressure going into the engines and try to reduce the power, bit of a knee jerk reaction to Sennas death considering it was blind luck that shrapnel hit him in the head following his crash.
@atomicR4GER not blatenetly taking someone out on purpose to win a title though... on more than 1 occasion
senna was worse cheat
2:94 look at him go with that flag
Formel 1 auf RTL war damals schon Schrott.
Das war für mich gerade die Zeitenwende. Davor war F1 auf RTL ansehnlich mit Knupp & Rosberg. Dann kam Heiko Wasser - so ein schleimig-glattgebügelt wirkender Reporter - und es ging den Bach runter. Dass Schumi serienweise F1-WM wurde, weil die alte Garde (Senna, Mansell, Prost) weg war, tat ihr übriges.
OK... so he pushed Montoya wide at Imola in '04? he had the right of way! I've seen just about every driver in F1 pass someone and squeeze the car on the outside wide on the exit. The move on Frentzen on the exit of the pits was dirty, yes.. but he got a penalty which almost lost him the race anyway, so how is it an issue? He ignored black flags.. he got DQ'd so again, why is it an issue? Monaco '06.. did you see what happened in '07 to Massa and Kimi? Obviously not..
Well senna drove into someone on purpose once, schumacher did it twice. Check your caps lock key too, fanboy.
I call BS, Hamilton has been penalised multiple times for things that fall under "unsportsmen like conduct", and lets not forget that Senna was DSQ from Suzuka '89 for short cutting the track, and subsequently banned for 6 months. That penalty may have smacked with bias, but why does that make it any different from any penalty received by Schumacher or anyone. All drivers push the limits, and Schumacher is no better or worse than Senna, Prost et al in that regard.
So it's OK for Senna who said that he would (and did) DELIBERATELY TAKE A RIVAL CAR win a championship, but not for Schumacher? Because Senna's incident with Prost at turn 1 was in now way a "normal racing incident." Regarding the TC on the Benetton, other than someone who was selling one of the cars saying it had TC do you have any other proof? because if it had TC i'm 100% sure the british media would've uncovered it, it didn't have TC, end of. TBC..
mansell another legend just like senna 2 of the best
Damon Hill should have been crowned World Champion in 1994, as well as 1996.
no) He should have won to be crowned
That is the point he's making. Hill should have won in 1994. Schumacher knew he damaged his car and his race was over after he went off and hit the wall, so he deliberately drove into Hill. People deny it all the time, but look at the footage (watch?v=91JoW4mSiZo), he knew Hill was there, you can see Schumacher looking at Hill in his mirror, he then turns into the corner suddenly and sharply. It was 100% deliberate.
Luewarm.
Strange how Schumacher turned right when the corner went to the right, he could not control what Hill did, Hill tried to overtake in the corner and even Hill has said he should have waited for a better place to pass.
There are idiots who try to say that Prost deliberately turned into Senna in 1989.
The driver in front has the right to take the line into the corner, it is up to the driver behind to make a safe pass.
Williams had help from the FIA. They banned Schumacher for two Races due to some shady penalty due to a Skidplate that was too thin
Damon Hill should never have been World Champion, He was a middling driver who got the best car because of His pedigree.
Stop the debate about senna and schumacher.both of them are cheater (senna in 1990,89,88 etc, and schumacher in 1994 etc) i love them but i can't deny that they have terrible approach to steal WDC
+Mohammad Bimoseno Senna cheated in 90, was cheated in 89 and what is the point about 88?
I agree about Schumacher and Senna, but Prost ain't a saint too.
Senna was not a cheater get over yourself......
Prost should have been called the winer lol watch the Senna movie you find out all the behind the scene things I'm laughing so hard at what the previous guy wrote...
Senna movie was too bias i think. You need to read Senna vs Prost by Malcolm Folley. It's more objective because Folley make an interview with driver / F1 Expert from Senna's era. The movie just covered the good side of Senna, and discredit Prost and Schumacher
Leandro Martins Portuguese Grand Prix 1988, when he was pushing Prost to the wall of pit lane in the start/finish straight
First of all, Senna is not a cheater, neither is Hamilton, neither is Prost - and neither is Schumacher. I think the point R4GER was making is that you can't call Schumacher a cheat without also calling the others cheats. As for Senna, stopping a winning strike? That '94 Williams was a dog, add to that, he'd been beaten to the title in '92 & '93 - I'm not saying he wasn't great, but he was a mortal, just like the rest of them, capable of being beaten by superior cars/drivers. Fanboi much?
You can't not call Senna a cheater. Don't you have a little respect?!?!?!?!?! Senna was a comet from another world, he was so talented that he could never think for cheating. He's death stop he's winnig strike. If Senna was abble to survive, the other pilots will probably never have the opportunity to win! Schumacher IS A CHEATER!!! I have seen all of his races. Except the 7 world championships, i will remember him as a fucking cheater. So please stop writing bullshits and think a little bit.
not in a million years will that ever come true, no matter how much you want to illogically reason such
picture is wonderful...commentary...Heiko Wasser...hang him !!! and Jochen Mass was much better in driving....
@atomicR4GER the difference is schumacher does it fucking repeatedly!
It doesn't matter how many times he did it, he DELIBERATELY took another driver out, and, while contentious Prost didn't deliberately take out Senna the year before, Senna after that incident should've been banned for the next season at the least.
Benetton got penalised heavily for the fuel rig incident and once again someone brings up the issue of Benetton having TC and/or LC on their cars.. did you know Ferrari ALSO had such software.. but they didn't beat Senna or Hill so no one cares...
atomicRAGE Well, according to you, turning far earlier than normal is normal driving behavior... okay, okay...
You have been guilting this drivers all day long, don´t you?
People say schumacher was a fucking cheater. About what? a mistake of Damon Hill?
F-1 fans in 2012: 1.000.000.000.000
Real F-1 Fans: 1.000.000
Piloto mediano, só venceu em 92 porque tinha um foguete nas mãos.
So...Ayrton Senna got murdered and these people celebrated to reafirm the "iluminatti" business would go on, with the (next Top team) two Ferrari's right behind Mansell. Not only that, but they did a bunch of other dirty jokes dancing samba on humans rights face. Because Senna was really murdered.