Without a question the 3 greatest drivers of the last 30 years . A Senna at his peak A young and hungry Schumacher And a experienced Prost damn what a grid
@@DoisPatetasOFICIAL Ele nunca foi um piloto normal cara, mesmo sem títulos ele já era visto como um GRANDE potencial. Desde sua corrida em Spa em 91. Igual o Senna, já em 1984 na Toleman muitas equipes ficaram de olho nele.
After testing the new McLaren Ford, Pre season, Senna decided to race in the McLaren because it had a very nimble chasis which really showed it in that epic race at Donnington Park. If only the engine had more top end power, Senna would have challenged for the 1993 title. All in all it was still a great season for him.
Actually, one of the main reasons they had that nimble chassis was because they ran a V8 instead of a bulky V12! One of the reasons a well funded team like Benetton chose V8's for so many seasons was the trade off: they lacked some of the top end power of the V10/12's, but the fact that they left room to make the car more efficient in terms of aero and weight distribution made up for that. So i'm not sure the season would have been better had they chosen the Lamborghini V12 which was in the picture for 1993! It was heavy, used more fuel and extreme amounts of oil, and though it was more powerfull, it was not enough to make up it! As you said, it was a great season for Senna and I think it was the best he AND McLaren could do at that time.
@@joshimura1995 the Lamborghini engine was also very, very unreliable. We have to remember too that it was considered and tested only for the last races os the season. Remember who whon in Japan and Australia? Senna, with Ford
1993 will forever be one of my favorite seasons. The technology everyone was pushing out was fascinating, automatic gearboxes, ABS, CVT transmission, active suspension, DRS but cooler, even 4 wheel steering 1993 stands out because it was a one season wonder, 16 races of "Why not test this"
Q saudade quando levantava cedo para ver as corridas depois pegava as baik e ficávamos eu meus irmãos ocorrendo no pátio entre o arvoredo q infância melhor possível.
@MrLewisbate It is a well know fact that in that season the Williams Renault could provide around 780 hp while the Benneton's Cosworth V8 could reach steady 700 hp AND the McLaren Cosworth V8 something that went from 640 to 680 hp. Benneton had a deal with Ford and McLaren had to make a do with an older specification unit. They just leveled the specs from silverstone onwards. Even so Senna managed to be the vice-champion with Schumacher being fourth behind Hill.
It's impressive the way that Michael was able to pull away from Senna in the initial stages of the race. Prost had a disastrous race, jumping the start and then stalling his car twice after serving his stop-go penalty. It was the failure of a 10 cent rubber o-ring on Michael's Benetton that handed an easy win to Senna. Michael served notice once again that he was a force to be reckoned with!
+Mr18000rpm He was leading Senna by 18 sec after 30 laps. Amazing. It was only his 2nd Monaco GP. Michael showed his extra talent. This is the track where driving skills matter the most. The car has less importance contrary to some other circuits.
Indeed it's very impressive MR18000rpm that MS pulled away from AS with 50HP more. Veryyyy impressive. As for his DNF, tough shit, that's racing. At least he never lost a win in Monaco because the FIA stopped a normal wet race to favour an European home boy aka 1984.
armorgeddon MS was faster in the qualifying and in the race too. Senna was the king of Monaco, and it was only Schumacher's 2nd entry in Monte-Carlo, but in this early stage of his career proved greatness. Was not only quicker than the three times champion, but before Prost was penalized for jumping the start, Schumacher was right behind him : www.dailymotion.com/video/x12j1v0_f1-monaco-gp-1993-race-part-1_sport
Não tinha mais adversários os circuitos eram pequenos Ayrton Senna da Silva entendo campeão dos campeões sempre foi correr em outra dimensão com os deuses da F1 saudades amigo muitas saudades
I think this was the first year of paddle shifters. BRING BACK THE MANUAL TRANSMISSIONS! This was a skill that was beautiful to watch. I've seen drivers lose a race on the final lap because of a missed shift.
Ferrari had paddle shifters first in 1989. Williams has paddle shifters in 1991, maybe even 1990 too. McLaren started 1992 with manual shifters then changed to paddle shifters later on in the season.
It's interesting to see just how ahead of its time Michael's Benetton was, particularly with regard to the front-end design of the car. We don't see any other constructors at this time with that soon-to-be-standard bullet-shaped front-end design with the open space beneath the nose which was soon to be adopted by all constructors throughout Formula One. If Senna couldn't have gone to Williams in '92 or '93 like he wanted, it's only too bad he didn't go to Benetton in 1994 instead of Williams.
Incredibly Prost finished 4th in this race. Had he not stalled twice while serving his 10 second penalty for jumping the lights, it probably would have been a great finish, catching Senna & trying to pass him.
Exatamente, Senna com 70 cv a menos do que a Benetton de Shumacker... Senna com motor de segunda linha da Ford e Shumacker com motor primeira linha Senna The best
@Sideshow BOB você está certíssimo, ela era mais curta bem melhor nas curvas, o carro tinha aero dinâmica excelente, é o motor primeira linha da Ford era muito forte, e você falou a mais pura verdade, ela era quase uma Willians sim ...resumindo meu amigo, Senna correu desigual ,por isso deixou esse legado gigantesco...
Prost, Senna, Schumacher all in different cars and 1.0 to 1.5 seconds faster than their team mates in the qualifying. That was really more about sport and driving.
Eventually around mid-season of 1993, McLaren were using the same spec Ford Cosworth HB series 8 V8's that Benetton were using instead of the customer spec Ford Cosworth HB series 7 engines that the McLaren team started the season with
This was the race, where Schumi surprised the two Monaco greats. After the start, gradually pulled away from Senna and was driving right behind Prost, running one fastest lap after another. Too bad, that his Benetton couldn't bear that amazing pace and went wrong after 30 laps.
aacosta1697 Why not ? Jim Clark is considered one of the greatest drivers of all time, yet he never won a Monaco GP. Prost was very fast, won 4 times in Monte-Carlo..
Se nao tivesse as tragedia de imola em 94., ... Seria muito bom ver senna e shumacher ., se pegando nos anos.... 90....oa dois eram chegados em joga o carro., ...provoca batida pra decidi campeonato....
Y el ganador el único e inigualable A. Senna! Un héroe! PUNTO! El mejor, el compitió y ganó a los gigantes LAUDA, PROST, PIQUET, MANSEL, SHUMACHER! Alguna duda?
False, McLaren and Benetton too. In 93 all top teams had one, but Ferrari decided to remove it from their car because they never found how to make it to perform.
The Renault RS5 engine was absolutely the best engine created at the time, Ford was light-years away of Renault's creation, Senna wasn't able to catch up with Prost with his poorly designed car.
sslredes ert Actually the MP4/8 was one of the most advanced cars ever built..paiiring with Williams in electronic devices..The problem was that it was underpowered by its Ford V8(Customer's edition).Benetton got the deal for the factory engines and Ron Dennis had to resigned himself with the Customer ones. Senna and Hakkinen tested a Lamborghini V12 in the mid-end season and Senna once said that had they used it since the beginning they could have mounted a serious title threat to the Prost-Williams pair.
The McLaren MP4/8 a "poorly designed car"? Is this a joke? It was arguably the best and most advanced car on track, lighter, better chassis, superior electronics and active-suspensions, and clearly better handling compared to Williams or even Benetton. Just lacked power, that was the only weakness. But a bad car it wasn't, not even close.
That's a joke right? The NA v8s and v10s of that era sounded amazing. You are listening to a muffled on board Mic which does no justice to the true sound. Today's turbo V6 are an embarrassment to F1 and the worst sounding race engines of ALL time! They are only marginally better sounding than formula E.
Last year they went 365 km/h on Monza.... This year they will probably beat the 371 km/h speed record on the track. Also they had more driver aids in 1993 than today, traction control, automatic upshifts, active suspension. Today its the drivers skill that controlles the car, not a traction control program.
+Tanquecrack1 The Boss That way the cars can actually overtake eachother. You still have to be within a second of the car in front, and if the overtaken car can keep up, then again he can get a shot at overtaking in the next lap. That way its not like 10-15 years ago where 90% of the overtakes were done in the pits and not on track. Its a nessecary evil because of disturbed air.
Give senna that V12 or v6 twin turbo Honda and H-Pattern shifter and he would be competing for sure! even against the williams.... It's a Shame that MCLAREN resulted to use semi-automatic gearboxes
Yes, Prost had a very bad race I must say: as you said made a mistake when He jumped the start. The stallen engine is another story: it was more a problem of the clutch. PS: once He rejoined the race, He was the fastest man on track all race long. Even a great champion can have a disastrous race, as Prost did in 1993. Senna's 1988 Monaco GP is an indication that even the great guys with the best car on the grid, can loose an easy win as any noob driver in the field could do....
Totally agree with you. Please bear in mind that any comment made by me was made with the sole purpose of annoying rodcliffe the biased idiot. I was just trying to bait rodcliffe.
There were supposed to get V12 Lamborghini, but the deal was dropped during the winter, and by then it was too late for Senna to go to another top team. He signed a race-by-race contract with McLaren, as he wasn't sure he wanted to continue racing at all. A few wins at the start of the season convinced him to stay though.
You're welcome. That's probably why they got an older version of the Ford engine for the first half of the season and not the one Benetton had. The Lambo engine was supposedly heavy, but very powerful, and Senna was happy with its performance during testing, but I can't remember why the deal didn't go through.
+Rafasabee it can ruin the engines, i think they have to let all the fuel and oil run out before restarting it or something weird like that. f1 engines are weird.
+Rafasabee The problem may well have been due to the electronics, not the easiest car to start, still he came from 22nd up to 4th, no mean feat at Monaco
Essa McLaren de 93 era um carro espetacular, Schumacher seria campeão com esse carro pois era muito mais constante que Senna, que em toda carreira conseguiu marcar só tres voltas rápida em uma única corrida, Schumacher andava no limite toda a corrida, venceu um gp parando 4 vezes nos boxes.
@@MrTomsimoes é impressionante o quanto vocês são ignorantes. No site oficial da McLaren eles deixam claro que o carro era muito bom. Era uma super McLaren, Senna que só ganhou campeonato com carro superior, desse a ele um carro igual ele sofria, vide 91.
@@luiscarlosmax1566 Kkkk Já sei quem é você. Perdendo tempo haha Rapaz você não desiste. Kkkk Tu acha que pessoal vai acreditar que aqueles carro com aquele motor de f2. Tu é o fan boy do Shumi. Conheço teu modos operante. Cria umas história que só aconteceu em teu mundo. Cara ficou meses debatendo em outros vídeos . Rapaz larga de fanatismo. Pela última vez, Senna era superior ao alemão. Aqueles cinco títulos andando em um super carro sem concorrência dê companheiro não fará o alemão ser melhor. Mastigue e ingula esse fato. Para de fantasias.
@@MrTomsimoes eu não chamo de fanatismo, chamo de passar conhecimento, claro que pra pessoas aculturadas como você isso é perda de tempo, mas quero crer que para aquele que gosta realmente do esporte em questão, vai averiguar e constatar que tudo que eu posto é a mais pura verdade, como o caso da excelente McLaren de 93, é fácil, só acessar o site oficial da McLaren e tirar qualquer dúvida. Ja quando analisamos seu comentário percebemos que se trata de um ignorante, pois chamar o motor Ford que equipou a McLaren no começo de 93 de motor de f2, é atestar que Schumacher foi melhor que o Senna, pois com esse motor, Schumacher bateu Senna em 92 que estava com um motor Honda v12.
@@MrTomsimoes mais fatos aí. Rsrs Senna só foi campeão pilotando uma Mclarem com motor Honda, o melhor carro disparado do grid. O primeiro título de Senna ele disputou contra um piloto de 33 anos, o que é muito pra f1, o próprio Prost afirmava em 88 que não poderia forçar tanto, vejam bem, bando de ignorantes, não sou eu que digo que o Prost era velho, mas ele próprio afirmava isso, além disso era horroroso na chuva, chegou a abandonar por vontade própria o GP da Grã Bretanha por conta da chuva. Mesmo assim, Senna precisou dos descartes de pontos pra levar o título, tornando-se o segundo piloto da história a ser campeão marcando menos pontos que o vice. Pra se ter uma ideia da bizarrice desse sistema, só Senna e John Surtees foram campeões nessas condições. O segundo título de Senna ele disputou contra um piloto de 35 anos, mesmo assim precisou bater de propósito na traseira de uma mediana Ferrari pra se sagrar campeão, uma vergonha. O terceiro título ele disputou contra um piloto que demorou 5 anos pra vencer o primeiro gp da carreira e pasmem, estava com 38 anos de idade. Mansell dominou o GP do Canadá de 1991. Tanto, que começou a volta final já dando tchauzinho para a torcida. Porém, o inglês reduziu demais a velocidade e, como o sistema hidráulico utilizado pela Williams naquela época não podia ser alimentado com baixa rotação, isso apagou o sistema elétrico e, é claro, o carro. Os tchauzinhos viraram murros no volante, Mansell era tão "pereba" que perdeu um gp por andar lento demais na última volta. Kkkkkkk Analisando com base nos fatos, os títulos de Senna não tiveram tantos méritos como os seus fanboys acreditam, só foi campeão com o melhor carro, por conta dos descartes ou provocando acidentes.
Eu não consigo entender o porquê das dúvidas em torno de qual carro era a segunda força em 1993. Neste vídeo fica claro que Shumacher tinha muito mais trabalho pra segurar o carro, da pra ver que o carro da Benetton é o mais instável dos três. Como pode haver dúvidas sobre os espetacular McLaren em relação a boa Benetton?
Without a question the 3 greatest drivers of the last 30 years .
A Senna at his peak
A young and hungry Schumacher
And a experienced Prost
damn what a grid
Imagine being in that tunnel at 0:44 - 0:46 and having Prost, Schumacher and Senna go past you.
At that time Schumacher was Just one normal pilot
@@DoisPatetasOFICIAL Ele nunca foi um piloto normal cara, mesmo sem títulos ele já era visto como um GRANDE potencial. Desde sua corrida em Spa em 91. Igual o Senna, já em 1984 na Toleman muitas equipes ficaram de olho nele.
@@DoisPatetasOFICIAL Claro que ele não tinha o mesmo respeito que Prost e Senna, porém os outros pilotos sabiam do que ele era capaz.
@@DoisPatetasOFICIAL he was already seen as a future champ at this point
@@DoisPatetasOFICIAL He was already able to show his talent
Williams is so planted to the track, electronic suspension working a treat on that grid!
Escutar esse ronco de motor e, ver essa suspensão trabalhando,é um colírio pros olhos e sinfonia pros ouvidos. Realmente essa Willians é lendária!!!
After testing the new McLaren Ford, Pre season, Senna decided to race in the McLaren because it had a very nimble chasis which really showed it in that epic race at Donnington Park. If only the engine had more top end power, Senna would have challenged for the 1993 title. All in all it was still a great season for him.
Actually, one of the main reasons they had that nimble chassis was because they ran a V8 instead of a bulky V12!
One of the reasons a well funded team like Benetton chose V8's for so many seasons was the trade off: they lacked some of the top end power of the V10/12's, but the fact that they left room to make the car more efficient in terms of aero and weight distribution made up for that.
So i'm not sure the season would have been better had they chosen the Lamborghini V12 which was in the picture for 1993! It was heavy, used more fuel and extreme amounts of oil, and though it was more powerfull, it was not enough to make up it!
As you said, it was a great season for Senna and I think it was the best he AND McLaren could do at that time.
Michael I. Hansen They said it would be an improvement .
But Ron never signed the contract (sadly)
@@joshimura1995 the Lamborghini engine was also very, very unreliable. We have to remember too that it was considered and tested only for the last races os the season. Remember who whon in Japan and Australia? Senna, with Ford
1993 will forever be one of my favorite seasons. The technology everyone was pushing out was fascinating, automatic gearboxes, ABS, CVT transmission, active suspension, DRS but cooler, even 4 wheel steering
1993 stands out because it was a one season wonder, 16 races of "Why not test this"
5:06 A famosa suspensão ativa da Willians, o carro subia e descia do chão igual a um robô.
Gerson Costa canal tecnologia , incrível
i think the next year 94' if not prohibited Senna used, and think not kill.
Wow yeah, at 5:06 you can see Williams cheater suspension haha
Meu amigo, o Prost deixou o motor do carro morrer, por isso os mecanicos suspenderam o carro 2x pra ligar o motor. Não foi a suspensão.
@@ThiagoRochaBrasil mas quando suspende o carro é pela frente..aquela abaixada na dianteira foi da suspensão
Senna the king of Mônaco
Prost deveria ter vencido o Mônaco em 1993. Ele foi punido muito severamente porque estava destruindo o campeonato.
I was at this grand prix, watching from bureau de tabac corner. Fond memories... thanks for uploading!
no circuito mais trabalhoso Senna o melhor.de outro planeta
commentary Satoru Nakajima he was Senna's teammate
2:32 - Just listen to that monster!
th-cam.com/video/l-Ee3ATaB0Q/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/dB0J94ayu5k/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/E15a6AEAXTg/w-d-xo.html
Eu sou Senna até o fim , Senna sempre será o melhor , mais esse ronco do v10 das Willians era de arrepiar !!!!
Prost deveria ter vencido o Mônaco em 1993. Ele foi punido muito severamente porque estava destruindo o campeonato.
Q saudade quando levantava cedo para ver as corridas depois pegava as baik e ficávamos eu meus irmãos ocorrendo no pátio entre o arvoredo q infância melhor possível.
Me desculpem os puristas q não gostam de eletrônica, mas era hipnotizante ver essa suspensão ativa da Williams trabalhando.
E o que isso tem haver aff
Suspensão ativa do Piquet
@@gabriel17souza22 "haver" não tem nada
Sim sim, estupenda...
A McLaren do Senna também tinha , claro que não chegava aos pés + era um ótimo carro infelizmente não tinha motor...
@@richardjesus1055 A Ford mandou o motor bom para a Benneton, e o de segunda linha para a Mclaren
Senna with 70CV less engine. Legend.
Exatamente
Senna 70 cv a menos
Shumacker com motor de primeira linha da Ford.
Senna com motor de segunda linha da Ford.
Senna The best
@@paulosanavio436 A gestão da corrida roubou a vitória de Prost.
@MrLewisbate lol don’t be so salty. We’re never gonna know the answer so stop crying like a little boo boo bitch 😂
@MrLewisbate Schumacher is a amateur kid close to Senna.
@MrLewisbate It is a well know fact that in that season the Williams Renault could provide around 780 hp while the Benneton's Cosworth V8 could reach steady 700 hp AND the McLaren Cosworth V8 something that went from 640 to 680 hp. Benneton had a deal with Ford and McLaren had to make a do with an older specification unit. They just leveled the specs from silverstone onwards. Even so Senna managed to be the vice-champion with Schumacher being fourth behind Hill.
It's impressive the way that Michael was able to pull away from Senna in the initial stages of the race. Prost had a disastrous race, jumping the start and then stalling his car twice after serving his stop-go penalty. It was the failure of a 10 cent rubber o-ring on Michael's Benetton that handed an easy win to Senna. Michael served notice once again that he was a force to be reckoned with!
+Mr18000rpm He was leading Senna by 18 sec after 30 laps. Amazing. It was only his 2nd Monaco GP. Michael showed his extra talent. This is the track where driving skills matter the most. The car has less importance contrary to some other circuits.
Indeed it's very impressive MR18000rpm that MS pulled away from AS with 50HP more. Veryyyy impressive. As for his DNF, tough shit, that's racing. At least he never lost a win in Monaco because the FIA stopped a normal wet race to favour an European home boy aka 1984.
The rumor always was though, that Senna planned to go the distance
without a pitstop and that he only changed tires when he was sure to win
anyway.
armorgeddon
MS was faster in the qualifying and in the race too. Senna was the king of Monaco, and it was only Schumacher's 2nd entry in Monte-Carlo, but in this early stage of his career proved greatness. Was not only quicker than the three times champion, but before Prost was penalized for jumping the start, Schumacher was right behind him : www.dailymotion.com/video/x12j1v0_f1-monaco-gp-1993-race-part-1_sport
Schumacher's team mate, Patrese changed tires in lap 41. Senna came into the pits in lap 51. So there wasn't a big difference.
Beauty of onboards are insane.
Não tinha mais adversários os circuitos eram pequenos Ayrton Senna da Silva entendo campeão dos campeões sempre foi correr em outra dimensão com os deuses da F1 saudades amigo muitas saudades
saudades desse grande piloto meu idolo sou brasileiro com muito orgulho e sei senna esta em paz com nosso senhor JESUS CRISTO amém
Renaut V10 engineer = Rocket power
6° Vitória do Ayrton, em Mônaco. Um recorde que perdura, á exatos 27 anos, que o mantem o título de Mister Mônaco 👑
Isso que só correu lá 10 vezes. O alemão, correu quase 20.
O rei de Mônaco
Prost deveria ter vencido o Mônaco em 1993. Ele foi punido muito severamente porque estava destruindo o campeonato.
@@ziguigui22ala, chegou o fanboy de prost
Williams, what an electronic powerhouse, that car was perfect!
I think this was the first year of paddle shifters. BRING BACK THE MANUAL TRANSMISSIONS! This was a skill that was beautiful to watch. I've seen drivers lose a race on the final lap because of a missed shift.
Ferrari had paddle shifters first in 1989. Williams has paddle shifters in 1991, maybe even 1990 too. McLaren started 1992 with manual shifters then changed to paddle shifters later on in the season.
@@IlIlIlIlIlIlIlIlIIlIlIlIllIlIl from what I was reading, the Pacific team had manual gearboxes in 95 also
Baita vídeo monstro e raro...só fera na parada ..
It's interesting to see just how ahead of its time Michael's Benetton was, particularly with regard to the front-end design of the car. We don't see any other constructors at this time with that soon-to-be-standard bullet-shaped front-end design with the open space beneath the nose which was soon to be adopted by all constructors throughout Formula One. If Senna couldn't have gone to Williams in '92 or '93 like he wanted, it's only too bad he didn't go to Benetton in 1994 instead of Williams.
Johnson Steele or Ferrari
Senna at Benetton would’ve been the better move in hindsight. He also would be alive as well. 🤦♂️
@@RossBayCult probably would’ve won another wc too!
Incredibly Prost finished 4th in this race. Had he not stalled twice while serving his 10 second penalty for jumping the lights, it probably would have been a great finish, catching Senna & trying to pass him.
Prost should have won Monaco in 1993. He was punished very severely because he was destroying the championship.
the williams sound is awesome!
The williams sounded too rattley and grainy. TBF this mclaren shounds shit, but the previous models Senna raced sounded incredible.
McLaren Ford vs McLaren Honda, there is no comparison... Lifetime Honda 💪
Exatamente, Senna com 70 cv a menos do que a Benetton de Shumacker...
Senna com motor de segunda linha da Ford e Shumacker com motor primeira linha
Senna The best
@Sideshow BOB você está certíssimo, ela era mais curta bem melhor nas curvas, o carro tinha aero dinâmica excelente, é o motor primeira linha da Ford era muito forte, e você falou a mais pura verdade, ela era quase uma Willians sim ...resumindo meu amigo, Senna correu desigual ,por isso deixou esse legado gigantesco...
So raw the sound of the renault engine than the ford
Prost, Senna, Schumacher all in different cars and 1.0 to 1.5 seconds faster than their team mates in the qualifying. That was really more about sport and driving.
hear the rev range difference of benetton schumacher car to sennas mclaren both ford . 1 factory engine . 1 slower customer spec engine in the mclaren
Eventually around mid-season of 1993, McLaren were using the same spec Ford Cosworth HB series 8 V8's that Benetton were using instead of the customer spec Ford Cosworth HB series 7 engines that the McLaren team started the season with
Se nessa temporada, Senna tivesse o motor do carro do Alemão. Senna, com certeza teria sido campeão.
Nunca. O carro do Prost era melhor.
I've seen a few on boards of Senna now, it seems he had a bit of an aggressive technique with the steering wheel.
This was the race, where Schumi surprised the two Monaco greats. After the start, gradually pulled away from Senna and was driving right behind Prost, running one fastest lap after another. Too bad, that his Benetton couldn't bear that amazing pace and went wrong after 30 laps.
2 Monaco greats= Graham Hill and Ayrton Senna
aacosta1697
Plus Prost with 4 wins on this track.
+Hungary599 that's not high enough
aacosta1697
Why not ? Jim Clark is considered one of the greatest drivers of all time, yet he never won a Monaco GP. Prost was very fast, won 4 times in Monte-Carlo..
Jim Clark isn't racing in this race....
Great footage, Michael was fast, Prost stalling out a couple of times at 4:00 had to laugh
According to Prost if he was punished, it only was to make the championship more interesting. I agree with him.
nome Ayrton Senna diz tudo..2decadas de saudade!
Mano parece que o carro da Willians flutuação, impressionante 😮
El profesor dando cátedra
essa fórmula 1 de 93. era melhor que ha de hoje. câmbio manual e no esforço físico.
Se nao tivesse as tragedia de imola em 94., ... Seria muito bom ver senna e shumacher ., se pegando nos anos.... 90....oa dois eram chegados em joga o carro., ...provoca batida pra decidi campeonato....
Vitória do Senna nessa corrida !!
Y el ganador el único e inigualable A. Senna! Un héroe! PUNTO! El mejor, el compitió y ganó a los gigantes LAUDA, PROST, PIQUET, MANSEL, SHUMACHER! Alguna duda?
E também foi vencido por eles.
Prost's Renault engine sounds scary asf
wow , williams had active suspension and no one else.
False, McLaren and Benetton too. In 93 all top teams had one, but Ferrari decided to remove it from their car because they never found how to make it to perform.
Imagine, 14 titles in this video.
0:54 2:04
My left ear say thanks to the preference
Did frost retire or stall
Where are the Announcers from?
Japan.
M.Schumacher pulled away from Senna quite fast.....crazy....
Wish Senna had listened to Ron Dennis he would still be alive
Senna, The Best!!
Prost the best
E o Prost ficou desesperado quando o motor da sua Willians morreu nos Boxes.
The Renault RS5 engine was absolutely the best engine created at the time, Ford was light-years away of Renault's creation, Senna wasn't able to catch up with Prost with his poorly designed car.
sslredes ert Actually the MP4/8 was one of the most advanced cars ever built..paiiring with Williams in electronic devices..The problem was that it was underpowered by its Ford V8(Customer's edition).Benetton got the deal for the factory engines and Ron Dennis had to resigned himself with the Customer ones.
Senna and Hakkinen tested a Lamborghini V12 in the mid-end season and Senna once said that had they used it since the beginning they could have mounted a serious title threat to the Prost-Williams pair.
+sslredes ert Couldn't catch Schumacher either!
The McLaren MP4/8 a "poorly designed car"? Is this a joke?
It was arguably the best and most advanced car on track, lighter, better chassis, superior electronics and active-suspensions, and clearly better handling compared to Williams or even Benetton.
Just lacked power, that was the only weakness. But a bad car it wasn't, not even close.
Isso é fórmula um , não essa fórmula um atual
Los dos autos arreglaos Prost y Shumacher con cajas automaticas y control de estabilidad (Grande senna )
El McLaren también tenía ayudas electrónicas, en ese año estaban permitidos
carro de Shumacher no tenia caja automática.
Listen the Senna engine it's wrost than listen me sing!
BaoZhai Zhang ford
At least today's V6s sound better than the Mclaren and Benetton V8s here...
That's a joke right?
The NA v8s and v10s of that era sounded amazing. You are listening to a muffled on board Mic which does no justice to the true sound.
Today's turbo V6 are an embarrassment to F1 and the worst sounding race engines of ALL time! They are only marginally better sounding than formula E.
Great carssss greats pilots great ERAÁ ......and today 2020 is pure crapp
Prost stalling the car twice. my word!
His clutch was failing during this race.
This was real f1 driving...not the f1 todays. I missing this times.
These cars had traction control... Thats not real driving.
Also they had very little power and were slow.
Last year they went 365 km/h on Monza.... This year they will probably beat the 371 km/h speed record on the track.
Also they had more driver aids in 1993 than today, traction control, automatic upshifts, active suspension.
Today its the drivers skill that controlles the car, not a traction control program.
+Rottensteam and what about drs?
+Tanquecrack1 The Boss That way the cars can actually overtake eachother. You still have to be within a second of the car in front, and if the overtaken car can keep up, then again he can get a shot at overtaking in the next lap. That way its not like 10-15 years ago where 90% of the overtakes were done in the pits and not on track. Its a nessecary evil because of disturbed air.
Essa seria do Prost, se não tivesse cagado toda a corrida...
Seria do Schumacher se não tivesse quebrado no fim…
*4:04** ... PROSTAPPEN or PROST MALDONADO...*
Kkkkk
Kkkkkkk Prostappen or Prost Maldonado
Quanta gente na entrada dos Boxes .,zueira total. Kk
Give senna that V12 or v6 twin turbo Honda and H-Pattern shifter and he would be competing for sure! even against the williams.... It's a Shame that MCLAREN resulted to use semi-automatic gearboxes
Como que o Prost, n iria ganhar o campeonato com um carro desse?
Infelizmente em 94 tentaram equilibrar, más só desequilíbrou e muito...
Prost deveria ter vencido o Mônaco em 1993. Ele foi punido muito severamente porque estava destruindo o campeonato.
SENNA ERA FORA DO COMUM O MAIOR PILOTO DE TODOS OS TEMPOS 👑
Prost
Very stable active suspension, today the downforce do the job
Além do Ponto Cégo, Estas São Az, Viajens dos Pilotos Brasileiros, In_do Onde, Ninguém Jamais, Estára, Deixa_Star,;/
Star Trek ?
Prost jumped the lights and stalled in the pits. Bad race for him
Yes, Prost had a very bad race I must say: as you said made a mistake when He jumped the start. The stallen engine is another story: it was more a problem of the clutch. PS: once He rejoined the race, He was the fastest man on track all race long. Even a great champion can have a disastrous race, as Prost did in 1993. Senna's 1988 Monaco GP is an indication that even the great guys with the best car on the grid, can loose an easy win as any noob driver in the field could do....
Totally agree with you. Please bear in mind that any comment made by me was made with the sole purpose of annoying rodcliffe the biased idiot. I was just trying to bait rodcliffe.
MP4/8 CLASSE😀🇮🇩😉🙂
The Williams drives almost better than modern F1 cars very flat throughout the corner
McLaren was really bumpy
And the Benetton was also really bumpy.
Senna without a gear stick just doesn't look cool, still great video!!!!
Si que era inseguro el circuito tanto para los comisarios, el público y los pilotos comparandolo actualmente
What happens at 3:58 ?
Prost jumped the start, so he came to box for drive through penalty, and apparently the engine stalled.
@@zardinho To be honest, Prost was stolen. They wanted to make the championship more interesting. Prost was dominating it from head to shoulders.
Never understood Senna staying with Maclaren when they went with Ford power. Or lack of power.
There were supposed to get V12 Lamborghini, but the deal was dropped during the winter, and by then it was too late for Senna to go to another top team. He signed a race-by-race contract with McLaren, as he wasn't sure he wanted to continue racing at all. A few wins at the start of the season convinced him to stay though.
I thank you very much for explaining that fact. For years that puzzled me. That sudden change must have made the engineers suicidal.
You're welcome. That's probably why they got an older version of the Ford engine for the first half of the season and not the one Benetton had. The Lambo engine was supposedly heavy, but very powerful, and Senna was happy with its performance during testing, but I can't remember why the deal didn't go through.
Lambo engines were powerful large V12s. But if we think about other seasons, they weren’t reliable.
As Willians ,como 92 eram as superiores , as Benneton já davam trabaio , as MacLaren defasada em relação aos mesmos.
I thought there was a Japanese ghost on my left.
What happens to prost!?? went to box due some penalty but stalled the car twice?? and why they take so long to crank again??
+Rafasabee it can ruin the engines, i think they have to let all the fuel and oil run out before restarting it or something weird like that. f1 engines are weird.
+Rafasabee
The problem may well have been due to the electronics, not the easiest car to start, still he came from 22nd up to 4th, no mean feat at Monaco
Le moteur Ford fait vraiment un bruit de crécelle comparé au Renault
PROST NUMBER ONE
Number one forever - Senna Brazil
Prost should have won Monaco in 1993. He was punished very severely because he was destroying the championship.
Senna Winner!
How would Hamilton fair amongst these 3
Irregular suspension Willians Team....no rules!!!!!
For me,the Benettons of that time were models of cheats.
Senna,the best .
Prost should have won Monaco in 1993. He was punished very severely because he was destroying the championship.
S E N N A
14 F1 titles! Hamilton never had these pilots against him....
Prost jumped the start and never got a penalty
マンセルだったらこんな事は起こらなかったでしょうね
jump start of prost.
Prost il lecchino ,per vincere gli occorrono 100 CV in più.
Essa McLaren de 93 era um carro espetacular, Schumacher seria campeão com esse carro pois era muito mais constante que Senna, que em toda carreira conseguiu marcar só tres voltas rápida em uma única corrida, Schumacher andava no limite toda a corrida, venceu um gp parando 4 vezes nos boxes.
Kkkk Não fala merda.
@@MrTomsimoes é impressionante o quanto vocês são ignorantes. No site oficial da McLaren eles deixam claro que o carro era muito bom. Era uma super McLaren, Senna que só ganhou campeonato com carro superior, desse a ele um carro igual ele sofria, vide 91.
@@luiscarlosmax1566 Kkkk Já sei quem é você. Perdendo tempo haha Rapaz você não desiste. Kkkk Tu acha que pessoal vai acreditar que aqueles carro com aquele motor de f2. Tu é o fan boy do Shumi. Conheço teu modos operante. Cria umas história que só aconteceu em teu mundo. Cara ficou meses debatendo em outros vídeos . Rapaz larga de fanatismo. Pela última vez, Senna era superior ao alemão. Aqueles cinco títulos andando em um super carro sem concorrência dê companheiro não fará o alemão ser melhor. Mastigue e ingula esse fato. Para de fantasias.
@@MrTomsimoes eu não chamo de fanatismo, chamo de passar conhecimento, claro que pra pessoas aculturadas como você isso é perda de tempo, mas quero crer que para aquele que gosta realmente do esporte em questão, vai averiguar e constatar que tudo que eu posto é a mais pura verdade, como o caso da excelente McLaren de 93, é fácil, só acessar o site oficial da McLaren e tirar qualquer dúvida.
Ja quando analisamos seu comentário percebemos que se trata de um ignorante, pois chamar o motor Ford que equipou a McLaren no começo de 93 de motor de f2, é atestar que Schumacher foi melhor que o Senna, pois com esse motor, Schumacher bateu Senna em 92 que estava com um motor Honda v12.
@@MrTomsimoes mais fatos aí. Rsrs
Senna só foi campeão pilotando uma Mclarem com motor Honda, o melhor carro disparado do grid. O primeiro título de Senna ele disputou contra um piloto de 33 anos, o que é muito pra f1, o próprio Prost afirmava em 88 que não poderia forçar tanto, vejam bem, bando de ignorantes, não sou eu que digo que o Prost era velho, mas ele próprio afirmava isso, além disso era horroroso na chuva, chegou a abandonar por vontade própria o GP da Grã Bretanha por conta da chuva. Mesmo assim, Senna precisou dos descartes de pontos pra levar o título, tornando-se o segundo piloto da história a ser campeão marcando menos pontos que o vice. Pra se ter uma ideia da bizarrice desse sistema, só Senna e John Surtees foram campeões nessas condições.
O segundo título de Senna ele disputou contra um piloto de 35 anos, mesmo assim precisou bater de propósito na traseira de uma mediana Ferrari pra se sagrar campeão, uma vergonha.
O terceiro título ele disputou contra um piloto que demorou 5 anos pra vencer o primeiro gp da carreira e pasmem, estava com 38 anos de idade. Mansell dominou o GP do Canadá de 1991. Tanto, que começou a
volta final já dando
tchauzinho para a torcida. Porém, o inglês reduziu demais a velocidade e,
como o sistema hidráulico utilizado pela Williams naquela época não podia ser alimentado com baixa rotação, isso apagou o sistema elétrico e, é claro, o carro. Os tchauzinhos viraram murros no volante, Mansell era tão "pereba" que perdeu um gp por andar lento demais na última volta. Kkkkkkk
Analisando com base nos fatos, os títulos de Senna não tiveram tantos méritos como os seus fanboys acreditam, só foi campeão com o melhor carro, por conta dos descartes ou provocando acidentes.
Prost made jump start
Prost should have won Monaco in 1993. He was punished very severely because he was destroying the championship.
u
Отстает Сенна.
McLaren sounds great, Williams aswell. Benetton sounds like I would eat sand... awful
Eu não consigo entender o porquê das dúvidas em torno de qual carro era a segunda força em 1993. Neste vídeo fica claro que Shumacher tinha muito mais trabalho pra segurar o carro, da pra ver que o carro da Benetton é o mais instável dos três. Como pode haver dúvidas sobre os espetacular McLaren em relação a boa Benetton?
Back when Monaco required real skill before they removed most of the tricky barriers and allowed drivers to make mistake without cost.
Prost was faster.
Prost should have won Monaco in 1993. He was punished very severely because he was destroying the championship.
Wow senna sucked