15:50 As a Pole, this is 1000% accurate. For those uniniformed - liberum veto privilege lets any member of Parliament to just not only veto an enitre vote on certain matter, but also negates the whole sitting of the Parliament (including matters and reforms that were ALREADY agreed upon). Added as a part of the Nihil Novi constitution from 1505, it was not used in Commonwealth at first, as we Poles could actually dispute at the time to reach a universal consensus. However, starting in 1651, when a local minor noble used it after being bribed by Lithuanian Radziwłł magnate family, it started being used as the weapon to fight internal opposition, neuter any attempt of the king to strengthen his position and just ensure the local short sighted particularists benefit over lack of reforms. It was one of the major reasons of downfall and later partitions of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Basically it is the bomb with a long fuse that later will continue to fuck you up as nobles sooner or later become particularist bastards until your country is partitioned by neighbours.
@@12354rony Liberum Veto was abolished by 3rd May Constitution from 1791 (the 2nd modern-type Constitution after American one), 4 years before 3rd and final partition of PLC in 1795. Lithuania and Poland regained independance 123 years later after the World War One, in reality where any individual having or invoking the similar privilege would be ridiculous anyways* *Yes, Her Majesty the Queen of Great Britain Elisabeth II still to this day HAS the power to outright veto any reform of British Parliament and to negate and disband the session of said Parliament, but invoking it would be either taken as a bad joke or lead to abolishment. Which of course is probably the last thing she would want.
Here in america we still have a LIGHT version of this called the filibuster which can indefinitly delay a bill from being passed so long as theres not three fiths of the senate agreeing on a bill which means if its not bipartisan its going to be dragged out into oblivion until it is.
@@karolnowak6423 Those powers are good to have around in case Parliament goes of the rails so hard the vast majority support the Queen using them. The dissolve Parliament was actually used by the Governor General of Australia once when the party in power flat out refused to accept the results of popular vote thus preventing in effect a Parliamentary autocracy the Governor General being appointed by the Queen. But as you infer these powers are unlikely to be used.
Thé reason why navarra owns Normandy is because the king of Navarra at that time was also claiming the French throne and with his heritage also had possessions in Normandy and whenever he would pressure the king of France that he would rebel and start a war, the king would give him more land
I wonder if the king ever thought about how that would just make defending against him if he actually started a war more difficult, thus tempting for the king of Navarra
@@barzenoki7004 it was a constant threat and also that king, Charles the Bad (of Navarra) had a lot of support in France because some thought he had an even stronger claim than the English king to the throne of France, but then after one too many plot, French king John II imprisoned him If you want more details you can actually watch the Kings and Generals series about the 100 years war
Ioannis Kantakouzenos being a pretender is not quite accurate as he just wanted to be a regent for Ioannis V, who was too young to become emperor and he was a very close friend to Andronikos III, Ioannis V's father, whom he probably wouldn't even have betrayed in his death bed. He even called himself Ioannis VI when he became emperor to indicate that Ioannis V is the legitimate successor. It would have been really nice if Kantakouzenos just became a regent instead of just removing the Palaiologos from the throne. Edit: It seems I was wrong about Kantakouzenos not attempting to become emperor since he made his son co-emperor. Still Ioannis V, who was still co-emperor, succeeded Kantakouzenos after he tried to do so which means the real historical timeline can't be replicated in this mod.
Byzantine emperors didn't use regnal numbers so the assumption of Ioannis VI naming himself "the sixth" would be incorrect. He also proclaimed his son Matthaios as co-emperor, indicating that he wanted to replace the Palaiologos with the Cantacuzenus.
@@tjn7608 You're right about his son becoming co-emperor, but I don't know about them using regnal numbers. I have read parts of his "History" and there he indeed never used those regnal numbers. So you might be right on that as well
i need to tall you: during the peace deals you weren't using return territory, clicking the map will always be the demand territory, and the way it looks is different enough for me to tell you lost some warscore when fighting the ottomans by not having them return the cores properly also if you use a fleet to hunt pirates, it reduces the devastation impact they cause and reduces the money they get from you. this one is very important to look into
Surprisingly, the Byzantine armies by the end of their existence were mainly cavalry based. The Tagmata, the elite section of the Byzantine army proper, were all heavily armored knights.
That process probably started before they even separated from west Rome. They routinely fought the best cavalry in the world. Scythians, Parthians, Persians, Sarmatians etc
@@krawr2187 the process started in west rome actually, because cavalry proved effective at dealing with germans, but only the east had the money to take it to its logical conclusion.
@TheSocialStreamers because I know you guys are both big history buffs, you should look into John VI Kantakouzenos, he was the the Byzantine emperor just before the start date you picked. He had a very close friendship with Umur bey of Aydin (whose heir and older brother you conquered), so close they considered each other brothers and Umur Bey turned down a marriage to Kantakouzos' daughter because he claimed it would be like marrying a close family member. Long story short, during Kantakouzos' reign the byzantines followed a policy of cooperation with the Anatolian Turkic beyliks, and historians believe that the byzantines likely could have maneuvered into a role as kingmakers in Anatolia and likely would have held the Bosphorous in such a role. Instead the Palaiologos dynasty claimed sole rulership after a devastating Civil War (ending in 1347), and turned policy towards garnering nebulous and ultimately futile support from Catholic europe. I dont know if anyone besides me finds this totally fascinating as a "what if" scenario, but I presented an undergraduate thesis adjacent to this topic in the Spring, and I find the final days of the Byzantine empire (but even more so the early days of the Ottoman empire) totally fascinating and in dire need of new historical perspective.
@J Wilt I believe it was the monument in Tunis combined with the Byz mission for having the Tunis area? Its quite far down the mission tree but it was something about that combination that was an issue. Unfortunately its been quite some time since I last tried FU and 1356 together so I can't remember the precise details.
I don't play a lot of Eu4, but why is the decision at 15:45 So bad? What's the Problem with Free Manpower? Is there a hidden catch or is this only historian roleplaying?
Historically, it made the king of poland nearly powerless, so it would most likely do the same to him by barraging him with bad events once the war was over.
Liberum veto privilege lets any member of Parliament to just not only veto an enitre vote on certain matter, but also negates the whole sitting of the Parliament (including matters and reforms that were ALREADY agreed upon). Added as a part of the Nihil Novi constitution from 1505, it was not used in Commonwealth at first, as we Poles could actually dispute at the time to reach a universal consensus. However, starting in 1651, when a local minor noble used it after being bribed by Lithuanian Radziwłł magnate family, it started being used as the weapon to fight internal opposition, neuter any attempt of the king to strengthen his position and just ensure the local short sighted particularists benefit over lack of reforms. It was one of the major reasons of downfall and later partitions of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Basically it is the bomb with a long fuse that later will continue to fuck you up as nobles sooner or later become particularist bastards until your country is partitioned by neighbours.
In EU3, that decision made you move two points towards decentralization, which decreased your income (along with a bunch of other penalties). It can take many years to move a slider once as well. If there are any bad hidden events or something, I think they should make it more clear in EU4.
EU4 has always had a difficulty with non standard english letters, the name likely has special letters such as the two dots or something that the game cant properly recognize
It does, just the other way around. A coastal fort that's not blockaded gives a -3 siege modifier to the attacker. If it is blockaded, the modifier gets increased to 0, and can be pushed up further with age abilities or flagships. So blockading a siege basically gives you a +3 dice roll.
I like this mod a lot. But, in this mod, AI has a very hard time forming Russia and even France. Also, it needs a mechanism to weaken Timmy after Timerlane dies. Now it's such a monster.
@@carltonleboss thats when Car Dušhan died right? Im mitvthat good with Serbian history but i had to learn some at school tho he was crowned Car in Skopje
what i want to know is how did Byzantium lose the selanik province and gain achaea & morea between 1356 & 1444? is that a real historically accurate thing that happened?
yes, its not that complicated: morea was a vassal of byzantinum, and while byz was getting steamrolled by the ottos elsewhere morea expanded into achea as the ottomans wasnt focusing in that area and was more concerned with eating up serbia and bulgaria
Don't think there are many who are interested in European medieval political history who's top 10 favorite guys list doesn't include Roger I or II - at the very least a honorable mention. Those dudes were literal legends
@J Wilt Meiou and Taxes is a complete overhaul. The systems it has are more complicated and generally better then fully updated base game. It doesn't matter that it has had updates, it is a completely different game almost. I'd recommend you try it and see for yourself.
Yes it was a law in that let's one member of parlament end sitting of parlament. It was inplemented in commonwealth and made passing any law almost immposible
Yes - liberum veto privilege lets any member of Parliament to just not only veto an enitre vote on certain matter, but also negates the whole sitting of the Parliament (including matters and reforms that were ALREADY agreed upon). Added as a part of the Nihil Novi constitution from 1505, it was not used in Commonwealth at first, as we Poles could actually dispute at the time to reach a universal consensus. However, starting in 1651, when a local minor noble used it after being bribed by Lithuanian Radziwłł magnate family, it started being used as the weapon to fight internal opposition, neuter any attempt of the king to strengthen his position and just ensure the local short sighted particularists benefit over lack of reforms. It was one of the major reasons of downfall and later partitions of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Basically it is the bomb with a long fuse that later will continue to fuck you up as nobles sooner or later become particularist bastards until your country is partitioned by neighbours.
@@azh698 That ain't how cracked EU4 works, or at least, how any half decent crack works. You can access the launcher normally, you just need to edit .mod files to point to the correct folder instead of the goobledygook the Steam Workshop has by default. As to where to get this mod, skymods seems to have the latest version up.
Do you ever use a background soundtrack that isn't that ffs, I am so tired of hearing the same background music over and over and over. other than that enjoyable video :)
I can't stop thinking of the White Horde as just a bunch of WalMart moms rushing around, screaming for the manager - the protectorates are the casualties of their Karenness 😔
I love that mod! Naybe I should also play it?
Do it bruh
Yes
That would be awesome!
Yes.
Yes
15:50 As a Pole, this is 1000% accurate.
For those uniniformed - liberum veto privilege lets any member of Parliament to just not only veto an enitre vote on certain matter, but also negates the whole sitting of the Parliament (including matters and reforms that were ALREADY agreed upon). Added as a part of the Nihil Novi constitution from 1505, it was not used in Commonwealth at first, as we Poles could actually dispute at the time to reach a universal consensus.
However, starting in 1651, when a local minor noble used it after being bribed by Lithuanian Radziwłł magnate family, it started being used as the weapon to fight internal opposition, neuter any attempt of the king to strengthen his position and just ensure the local short sighted particularists benefit over lack of reforms. It was one of the major reasons of downfall and later partitions of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.
Basically it is the bomb with a long fuse that later will continue to fuck you up as nobles sooner or later become particularist bastards until your country is partitioned by neighbours.
I hope this horrifying veto privilege is null in nowadays Poland or former Commonwealth countries lol
@@12354rony Liberum Veto was abolished by 3rd May Constitution from 1791 (the 2nd modern-type Constitution after American one), 4 years before 3rd and final partition of PLC in 1795. Lithuania and Poland regained independance 123 years later after the World War One, in reality where any individual having or invoking the similar privilege would be ridiculous anyways*
*Yes, Her Majesty the Queen of Great Britain Elisabeth II still to this day HAS the power to outright veto any reform of British Parliament and to negate and disband the session of said Parliament, but invoking it would be either taken as a bad joke or lead to abolishment. Which of course is probably the last thing she would want.
In Lithuanian the Radziwłł family would be Radvila, but I think they were pretty polonized by that point
Here in america we still have a LIGHT version of this called the filibuster which can indefinitly delay a bill from being passed so long as theres not three fiths of the senate agreeing on a bill which means if its not bipartisan its going to be dragged out into oblivion until it is.
@@karolnowak6423 Those powers are good to have around in case Parliament goes of the rails so hard the vast majority support the Queen using them. The dissolve Parliament was actually used by the Governor General of Australia once when the party in power flat out refused to accept the results of popular vote thus preventing in effect a Parliamentary autocracy the Governor General being appointed by the Queen.
But as you infer these powers are unlikely to be used.
As a Polish person, I confirm that Liberum Veto is a bad idea.
Thé reason why navarra owns Normandy is because the king of Navarra at that time was also claiming the French throne and with his heritage also had possessions in Normandy and whenever he would pressure the king of France that he would rebel and start a war, the king would give him more land
I wonder if the king ever thought about how that would just make defending against him if he actually started a war more difficult, thus tempting for the king of Navarra
@@barzenoki7004 it was a constant threat and also that king, Charles the Bad (of Navarra) had a lot of support in France because some thought he had an even stronger claim than the English king to the throne of France, but then after one too many plot, French king John II imprisoned him
If you want more details you can actually watch the Kings and Generals series about the 100 years war
Laithe suffers so much for us.... but damn is it fun to watch xD.
Keep up the great work lads!
Laith took the son of John Kantankenous over the Palaloigoi house of Byzantium
And that was the third golden age for Byzantium
His name is laith with a th
autonomous rebel suppression if you enable it with military spending up, as soon as a rebel stack spawns your army will go to engage it.
Didn’t he say he wouldn’t play the Byzantines for awhile…must of been his lack of sleep that’s gotten to him
I hope EU5 starts in this year. 30:44 I was todays years old when I realised that menu button exists.
Ioannis Kantakouzenos being a pretender is not quite accurate as he just wanted to be a regent for Ioannis V, who was too young to become emperor and he was a very close friend to Andronikos III, Ioannis V's father, whom he probably wouldn't even have betrayed in his death bed. He even called himself Ioannis VI when he became emperor to indicate that Ioannis V is the legitimate successor. It would have been really nice if Kantakouzenos just became a regent instead of just removing the Palaiologos from the throne.
Edit: It seems I was wrong about Kantakouzenos not attempting to become emperor since he made his son co-emperor. Still Ioannis V, who was still co-emperor, succeeded Kantakouzenos after he tried to do so which means the real historical timeline can't be replicated in this mod.
Byzantine emperors didn't use regnal numbers so the assumption of Ioannis VI naming himself "the sixth" would be incorrect. He also proclaimed his son Matthaios as co-emperor, indicating that he wanted to replace the Palaiologos with the Cantacuzenus.
@@tjn7608 You're right about his son becoming co-emperor, but I don't know about them using regnal numbers. I have read parts of his "History" and there he indeed never used those regnal numbers. So you might be right on that as well
“You’re a white power”
- Laith 2022
Almost 2 years in the future all I can say is interesting
i need to tall you: during the peace deals you weren't using return territory, clicking the map will always be the demand territory, and the way it looks is different enough for me to tell you lost some warscore when fighting the ottomans by not having them return the cores properly
also if you use a fleet to hunt pirates, it reduces the devastation impact they cause and reduces the money they get from you. this one is very important to look into
Please do a part 2 and reclaim Rome
> Enclave
> Reclaim Rome
Pick one
@@andresalvarez5415 Rome
@@gabrielaldworth7476 Always
idea, play as norse swedish tribe of svealand in extended timeline and conquer scandinavia and the brittish isles.
Surprisingly, the Byzantine armies by the end of their existence were mainly cavalry based. The Tagmata, the elite section of the Byzantine army proper, were all heavily armored knights.
That process probably started before they even separated from west Rome. They routinely fought the best cavalry in the world. Scythians, Parthians, Persians, Sarmatians etc
@@krawr2187 the process started in west rome actually, because cavalry proved effective at dealing with germans, but only the east had the money to take it to its logical conclusion.
You've no right to conquer? ....You're Rome.
Was listening with half an ear.
"We've got Zwarrah we've got Tataouine..."
Wait what, we're invading Tatooine?
I'd love a part 2 of this byzantine playthrough
I would love to see a part 2 to this one!
'Roger the Norman' Sounds like the sort of Geek that would love playing EU4 lol
ey yo you posted this when I woke up. It's a gift from god
That mod is great! I like it more than extended timeline because it doesn't change a lot of base game mechanics
Byzantium stronk 💪💪💪💪💪💪
What is that graphics mod what is that graphics mod at 10:30? It looks super nice lol
do you mean the graphics mods he uses normally or do you mean vanilla eu4 after he turned off his normal mods?
@TheSocialStreamers because I know you guys are both big history buffs, you should look into John VI Kantakouzenos, he was the the Byzantine emperor just before the start date you picked. He had a very close friendship with Umur bey of Aydin (whose heir and older brother you conquered), so close they considered each other brothers and Umur Bey turned down a marriage to Kantakouzos' daughter because he claimed it would be like marrying a close family member.
Long story short, during Kantakouzos' reign the byzantines followed a policy of cooperation with the Anatolian Turkic beyliks, and historians believe that the byzantines likely could have maneuvered into a role as kingmakers in Anatolia and likely would have held the Bosphorous in such a role. Instead the Palaiologos dynasty claimed sole rulership after a devastating Civil War (ending in 1347), and turned policy towards garnering nebulous and ultimately futile support from Catholic europe.
I dont know if anyone besides me finds this totally fascinating as a "what if" scenario, but I presented an undergraduate thesis adjacent to this topic in the Spring, and I find the final days of the Byzantine empire (but even more so the early days of the Ottoman empire) totally fascinating and in dire need of new historical perspective.
Such a fun campaign, please continue!
Maybe do an Athens guide for old times sake? Starting as one of the Greek minors is always pain.
I'd love to see a 1356 Byz campaign using Flavor Universalis however as far as I am aware there is no compatibility patch for them?
There isn't
@J Wilt I've run them both together during a Byz campaign but run into some issues with missing monuments breaking missions iirc
@J Wilt I believe it was the monument in Tunis combined with the Byz mission for having the Tunis area? Its quite far down the mission tree but it was something about that combination that was an issue. Unfortunately its been quite some time since I last tried FU and 1356 together so I can't remember the precise details.
At the start, you might have wanted to mothball your fort for the pretenders to take Constantinople? Maybe someone would have declared...
For the life of me, i cannot understand why in the Extended Timeline, in this period the ottomans first conquer Philippopolis, not Kallipolis.
parthenon giving me flashbacks
i think that was the first time i watched the social streamers
Certified Byzantine moment
I don't play a lot of Eu4, but why is the decision at 15:45 So bad? What's the Problem with Free Manpower? Is there a hidden catch or is this only historian roleplaying?
Historically, it made the king of poland nearly powerless, so it would most likely do the same to him by barraging him with bad events once the war was over.
Liberum veto privilege lets any member of Parliament to just not only veto an enitre vote on certain matter, but also negates the whole sitting of the Parliament (including matters and reforms that were ALREADY agreed upon). Added as a part of the Nihil Novi constitution from 1505, it was not used in Commonwealth at first, as we Poles could actually dispute at the time to reach a universal consensus.
However, starting in 1651, when a local minor noble used it after being bribed by Lithuanian Radziwłł magnate family, it started being used as the weapon to fight internal opposition, neuter any attempt of the king to strengthen his position and just ensure the local short sighted particularists benefit over lack of reforms. It was one of the major reasons of downfall and later partitions of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.
Basically it is the bomb with a long fuse that later will continue to fuck you up as nobles sooner or later become particularist bastards until your country is partitioned by neighbours.
In EU3, that decision made you move two points towards decentralization, which decreased your income (along with a bunch of other penalties). It can take many years to move a slider once as well. If there are any bad hidden events or something, I think they should make it more clear in EU4.
@@DankusMemicus I think the idea of it is that the events are hidden.
Not entirely sure why, but whenever you capture that southern Albanian province, it tries to name it Aulona but it doesn't like it.
EU4 has always had a difficulty with non standard english letters, the name likely has special letters such as the two dots or something that the game cant properly recognize
@@XiaoYueMao I'd probably say that it's the ó, which you can actually type with Alt-Codes, but cannot be copy and pasted.
I like you playing mods. May I suggest the Voltaire's New Mightmare mod. I like the historically HRE a lot.
his pc is gonna explode
13:42 doesn’t blockading not affect sieges until one of the age options in age of reformation?
Blockading affects sieges. Fith the age Bonus it is just +1 more from the Base.
Always Blockade forts. Always.
It does, just the other way around. A coastal fort that's not blockaded gives a -3 siege modifier to the attacker. If it is blockaded, the modifier gets increased to 0, and can be pushed up further with age abilities or flagships. So blockading a siege basically gives you a +3 dice roll.
that was so cool thanks man
Is there a mod that make the game starts in a era when the Western Roman empire was still around? Or even the Ummayade Caliphate?
extended timeline covers basically every date so yes
@@zrader1 Seriously? Like, does it cover the bronze age too? Or even an era with Sumeria, Akkad, Assyrie, Babylon and Mycenae?
@@wargamesmaster it goes up to 2 AD, so no, you can't play as Akkad.
Could you continue this playthrough please? Another fun play would be Transoxiana where you could play as Timurlane.
Timur the lame himself?
Rome strong
They changed my favorite mil idea
18.54 Laith casually flexes on everyone who mispronounces Tunisian provinces
Pagan playthrough as Lithuania next!
I like this mod a lot. But, in this mod, AI has a very hard time forming Russia and even France. Also, it needs a mechanism to weaken Timmy after Timerlane dies. Now it's such a monster.
I've yet to play this mod, but I'm planning to eventually. It sounds like an au mod woukd fix this though, something like Xorme AI
Oh noooo. Not a world without France. Please, stop
time to spam him about not putting the link to the mod in the comments
Blob Serbia ah this is the male fantasy
It was better with Dušan. Then it also had Thessaly
Unfortunately, the year 1356 is about the time that the Serbian Empire declined
@@carltonleboss thats when Car Dušhan died right? Im mitvthat good with Serbian history but i had to learn some at school tho he was crowned Car in Skopje
I wish to see this more often
what i want to know is how did Byzantium lose the selanik province and gain achaea & morea between 1356 & 1444? is that a real historically accurate thing that happened?
yes, its not that complicated: morea was a vassal of byzantinum, and while byz was getting steamrolled by the ottos elsewhere morea expanded into achea as the ottomans wasnt focusing in that area and was more concerned with eating up serbia and bulgaria
Thessaly was ruled by simeon uros nemanjic , why is it not in serbia?
Did they debuff the Timurids in this one? By the 16th century they are usually unstoppable.
they don't exist in 1356
@@croco3671 they do pop up and they get insane modifiers
Don't think there are many who are interested in European medieval political history who's top 10 favorite guys list doesn't include Roger I or II - at the very least a honorable mention. Those dudes were literal legends
This is what you do for a living
Part 2 when?
What makes the troops a bad decision
How do you get the map to look like that??
You know what other mod starts at 1356? Meiou and Taxes. You should try it!
@J Wilt So? You can roll back eu4 to older versions. Plus figuring out how to do it is part of the fun (suffering) lol
@J Wilt Meiou and Taxes is a complete overhaul. The systems it has are more complicated and generally better then fully updated base game. It doesn't matter that it has had updates, it is a completely different game almost. I'd recommend you try it and see for yourself.
more of this!!
ahhh laith youre our favourite byzantiboo/romeaboo
YES DUDE 1356 IS AMAZING
I THINK you should form the eastern roman empire i like this video it was nice
more time lines!!
So tell me what you want, what you really really want.
Wait the Liberum Veto is bad?
Yes it was a law in that let's one member of parlament end sitting of parlament. It was inplemented in commonwealth and made passing any law almost immposible
Yes - liberum veto privilege lets any member of Parliament to just not only veto an enitre vote on certain matter, but also negates the whole sitting of the Parliament (including matters and reforms that were ALREADY agreed upon). Added as a part of the Nihil Novi constitution from 1505, it was not used in Commonwealth at first, as we Poles could actually dispute at the time to reach a universal consensus.
However, starting in 1651, when a local minor noble used it after being bribed by Lithuanian Radziwłł magnate family, it started being used as the weapon to fight internal opposition, neuter any attempt of the king to strengthen his position and just ensure the local short sighted particularists benefit over lack of reforms. It was one of the major reasons of downfall and later partitions of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.
Basically it is the bomb with a long fuse that later will continue to fuck you up as nobles sooner or later become particularist bastards until your country is partitioned by neighbours.
Did Tom leave the channel?
any way to get this mod on cracked eu4?
You have to replace the game files with the mod files, since you don't go through the launcher to activate the mod.
@@azh698 That ain't how cracked EU4 works, or at least, how any half decent crack works. You can access the launcher normally, you just need to edit .mod files to point to the correct folder instead of the goobledygook the Steam Workshop has by default.
As to where to get this mod, skymods seems to have the latest version up.
@@AnglosArentHuman is it as hard as it sounds? xD
Yo Laith go contact Geography Now, they making an episode about Tunisia
part2 pls
Whats the name of this mod?
1356
gib part 2
-SocialStreamers
-No
-CasualCrash
-Yes
Play MEIOU and Taxes
Ngl liberum veto is good
You went too far when you conquered walachia which was beyond the Danube personally I would have made them a march
This play through
I instantly started speaking Greek and forgot Turkish when you vassalized Aydın :(
hello laithe
The White horde is based
Boy that background music is starting to get old my man. Maybe get some variety idk.
10:16 pls tell me what graphics mod that is?
I am spamming you in the comments
9 seconds
😴 ƤＲＯ𝓂Ｏ𝕤ᗰ
Do you ever use a background soundtrack that isn't that ffs, I am so tired of hearing the same background music over and over and over.
other than that enjoyable video :)
Eeeeeeee
I disagree, that's not the best time line but i respect your decision
I can't stop thinking of the White Horde as just a bunch of WalMart moms rushing around, screaming for the manager - the protectorates are the casualties of their Karenness 😔