It's okay ! Most of the name have a good pronunciation. It's just somewhat strange for us, Jeanne d'arc to Joanne of arc, or Jean to John. But your vidéo are perfect, thank you !
can't imagine any of todays royals fighting like the Black Prince and his noble friends...and hats off to the French. .King Jean and his young son and his nobles. .todays Charles wouldn't lift a finger to save this country as he has thrown away 100's of years culture and history as long as people bow and curtsey ..sold Christianity out to appeal to the Muslims and non English.
@@shaunwalker2557let’s be honest, the French have had war PTSD since WW2 🤷🏽♂️😂 and then having to watch the United States (the country they once controlled) be given the glory had to hurt lol
@@MrBubblecakethe French were absolute pillars in WW1 and basically fought to a stalemate most of the way through. In WW2, the army was broken far too quickly to really make an impact but their civilians did the bulk of the groundwork for the invasion of Normandy to allow the allies to free their home. While lots of people talk down on the French from that time period, I have always acknowledged that both wars might have been lost without the sacrifice of a ton of French people. Not all of us believe our military was the only reason the enemy was beaten.
21:40 just my opinion, but it seems to me as though the decision to feign a retreat towards the river was a clever move. Not only does the Earl of Warwick entice the enemy into their initial charge, but once his troops wheel about to engage the enemy, he manages their repositioning, so that an out flanking option is no longer available to the French, as the English battle line runs to the marsh, PLUS the archers final position winds up being in that marsh, where they are well protected from cavalry. None of these things existed whilst Warwicks division remained where it initially stood.
This one step back as invitation... not new there. But enough french commanders and enough of the soldiers were there not intelligent enough in tactics or too intelligent for anti fight egoism. Unbelievable this acting. It was a bloody gift to the invaders.
I can feel myself envious of the Black Prince: hmmmm, what do I get my dad for Christmas? Oh, I know - I'll expand Gascony by nearly double, and bring the French King home as a prize. Easy, peasy. Me: I hope my dad likes this card.
In fact, the gascons wants to keep Jean 2 prisoner at Bordeaux and it was Edward 3 who forced the black prince against his wish to bring him to London leading the black prince to compensate the gascons. The consequences were that the black prince lose the gascons trust and Gascony wassn't expand until 1360 with the Bretigny treaty but it was a step back from the London treaty in 1358 (never accepted by the Valois) because of the failure by Edward 3 chevauchée in 1359-1360
Amazing video! It really shows how terrain is important when facing a heavy cavalry force, the french were defeated the same way they were in crecy and the same way the parthians were defeated by ventidius at mount gindarus. You guys should remake crecy btw! Keep up the good work!
I would pay very good money to see HM cover the wars of South America. There arent many military history channels here, and definitely nowhere close in quality. I really hope it happens one day, they're all very interesting conflicts
Thank you for this! I don't know how long the video lasts but Schwerpunkt uploaded a 3 hours tactical analysis of Poitiers that I prepotently recommend
It was another wonderful historical coverage video shared by an amazing ( History Marche) channel about Poitiers' battle between French kingdom and Anglogascon invaders on French territory at 1356 AD..where English long bow had obvious role for English gaining victory ✌️ while French utilized short Bows and bad controlling of French warriors columns brought defeat to French campaign....thank you (History Marche ) channel for sharing this incredible work
I'm surprised how the French didn't focus special attention on the English longbow men before any front line engagement. These English units proved time and again to be the most dangerous yet the French repeated the same mistakes. Can anyone explain if maybe I am wrong?
No the french learned overtime and to be fair the English longbowmen were brilliant when in good terrain or defence. If they weren’t supported or their defences weren’t ready they could be overrun due to their lack of armour.
One of the main reasons French knights didn't focus on longbowmen is because most knights wanted to capture enemy nobility so that they could earn a ransom. Ransoms were extremely profitable and a key incentive for fighting in war at the time. Many poorer knights needed ransoms in order to finance the money they spent to go off to war. However longbowmen were not nobility, so they weren't worth a ransom and thus French knights sought to fight English knights instead of longbowmen. Essentially there was a strong financial reason to only focus on the English knights.
They wanted adventure, glory and fortune like their Frankish ancestors in Charlemagne's times or Crusades for example, because they were raised on the Songs and Epics, of Roland or King Arthur, and even Troubadours's love songs (in chivalric way). It was particularly successful among the Nobility, because the values of chivalry were born in France, or the Medieval French (and Occitan) speaking world in general (particularly, Counties of Toulouse, Provence or Duchies of Aquitaine, Burgundy and Normandy, plus Norman's Sicily ). This is why most, including the youngest, were so eager to fight first, but in the old feudal mentality, while the world had already changed. The Plantagenet Army modernized more, especially after the wars against the Scots, where they saw that the old tactics of chivalry alone were no longer enough. Then in the 15th century, it will be the opposite, Charles VII will promote a more modern army, where the Plantagenets will remain cemented in the ancient tactics of the Longbowmen, which worked before.
Another big reason i think is that they saw it beneath themselves to charge, what in their minds were, "peasants". Chivalry took presedence over consideration on how to best win the battle.
The graphics on the maps do make following events a bit easier reading thehistory with a map available is much mure confusing. This presentation is like setting out terrain and miniatures, which is my preferred methodv for situation as complex as this. Well done! --Bob Bailey in Maine
The French defeat at Poitiers is a very clear and useful example of how command and control broke down on the behalf of the French army in respect of the early cavalry charges and then the uncoordinated and unsupported attacks of separate battiles against the Anglo-Gascon lines. Leaving ripe for the plucking and defeat when superior command and control on the part of the Anglo-Gascon's leadership and tactical responses to the French moves, enabled them to make the most of their opportunities to score a decisive victory, with that double cavalry envelopment at the end.
This shall be my sacrifice to the comment algorithm! I may not be able to tune in to watch these all the time when they come out, but I will always watch the videos you cover on historical battles.
Excellent video! Thank you! I learned of the Battle of Poitiers from reading the "Chivalry" series by Christian Cameron (an historical fiction). The first book covers the Battle of Poitiers, as well as many of the years following. The second book covers the Sack of Alexandria.
Hey HistoryMarche while you're at it ... please do next on the two Barons Revolts and a compilation of the 100 Years War ... Looking forward to it ❤️💙🤜🍻🤛
@HistoryMarche You guys scored with David McCallion doing the narration. How do I make arrangements for him to read my eulogy when I die? Great channel, It is immensely informative about my research topic on human psychology. Keep up the great work team!
After watching many of these battles, its amazing how the french attacks always seem to be so disorganized, how they constantly attacked when the english were in such a superior position, and how they failed to attack the longbowmen
Excellent presentation and carefully accurate. The only thing is that the so-called “Black Prince” was never called by that name while he lived and for manny years after. This name was a construct of later writers. That aside, I commend you on an excellent and well presented animation and narration. Well done!!! - Rev ChristopherT. Jenkins
I wonder how the Edwardian phase influenced the position of Aquitainians after the region was incorporated into Valois territory Also really interested in Carolingian phase of the war.
I could watch this series 100 times and it still wouldn't get old! I wonder what direction the HYW would've taken if the Black Prince didn't die so young?!
It's been a long time since I studied the HYW but I suspect the structural issues that lead to England's eventual defeat would still have panned out the same way. England still wouldn't have been able to pay for and maintain its garrisons; the occupied territories would always have remained just that - occupied, not assimilated; the disparate, culturally French, factions would still have eventually united to drive out the English. England had no shortage of inspiring, skilled commanders after Edward, but they were never able to field armies on the same scale as the French or wield the same financial muscle.
@@Jack-xg1kg That sounds about right. Leaders can do a certain amount to draw in funds and gather allies, provide high-level political momentum to maintain wars, but there's a limit to it. The only way the HYW could have ended any other way would be if the black prince stuck around long enough to intimidate the french into an unconditional surrender, since outright beating of a kingdom the size of france wasn't ever really on the cards unless a lot of french nobles switched sides.
@@spamhonx56 The Black prince died in 1376 (46 years old) while the Valois reconquest was between 1369 and 1375. In 1358, the 2nd London treaty gave Edward 3 half of france but un 1375, the only Edward continental possessions were Bayonne, Bordeaux, Brest and Calais (less than before the war) while the black prince was still in command. When the black prince died, it was only the final nail in the coffin and the tide has turn a long time before. Even if the black prince has survived, the Plantagenet were already on the losing end and the Black prince will ruled for 10 years (20 at best). What really hurts Eward 3 and the black prince was Charles 5 coronation in 1364 and the death of many great english commanders in the 1360s like Henry of grosmont in 1361 or John Chandos in 1369.
I don't quite understand though why these commanders, like french in this instance, didn't try to utilize more of their force at once. Why the piece-meal attacks? And if you're going to do waves of attacks, why not schedule them more closely together?
The main reason is that French command over the army wasn't absolute, lot of knights and subcommanders acting independantly. It stopped only in the last decades of Hundred years war, when France had finally a more professionnal army and a lot of artillery, and won.
In the medieval era, low/local nobles have to fund themselves in war and with the big winter 1315-1317 and the black plague 1347-1351, many farmers who survived moved to cities while local nobles have less money with less people to tax and their only way to keep a decent income was war with ransom, that means you have to make another noble prisoner yourself and you can't if the men in arms made the jobs themselves. Another reason is Valois kings ruled only since 1328 and unlike Capetiens (who have also few power from 987-1180), they have to gained respect from nobility and people and are unlicky enough to deal with war since 1337 and many defeats in a row since 1345. The duty from nobles at the time is to protect the peasants who will fund their lavish lives in return. Because the chevauchees made so damages and french nobles have been incompetent since 1345, they have to fight and each one fight for his own glory instead to focus on winning the battle
I would like you to do the Battle of Khotyn - the Ottoman Empire and their allies against the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the Zaproscy Cossacks 😊😊
Funnily enough, it worked almost every time. This channel just over focuses on their few defeats. France had the best and most numerous knights in Europe, in an age where heavy cavalry was the meta.
@@dentkort That's really it honestly, so often are they used to simply steam rolling their enemies with sheer French chivalric mass that even when every sign says their better of staying put or waiting it out, somehow they still throw out all better thinking and charge anyway. Hey if it works almost all the time there's no way it could go wrong just this once right?
I love your videos! One minor note: sometimes the script jumps abruptly between past and present tenses, and it can be jarring - just something to consider when proofreading.
I'll never understand why medieval kings loved sitting around with a massive reserve watching their first wave slowly dwindling instead of ever moving to encircle and overwhelm one of the flanks.
Probably because the first wave usually contained inexperienced units and would be easily defeated leaving the attackers without a centre. I think the plan was to weaken the defenders and wear them out before committing the experienced soldiers, aiming to break through the enemy's centre
Hi there HistoryMarche. First i would like to say that as a History buff, I absolutely love your work and dedication to it through the years, keep them coming lads ! That being said, as a frenchman, I would like to point out that, as you say, you do butcher some prononciations of our french words, just like no french people is able to say "worcestershire sauce" correctly, and it's no problem. But when it comes to key figures of the time, none of our monarchs were named John (\ˈdʒɑn\), but rather Jean (/ʒɑ̃/). Then again, love your work, just some small constructive criticism.
Only a French person would be so pedantic. Trace it back to the codification of your language during the implementation of the Napoleonic Code. There is no right way in language. It constantly evolves. Your conception of "proper pronunciation" is only as old as the French Revolution. Just some constructive criticism about having some perspective on your own culture and history.
@@write-only The concept of French didn't encompass the whole of France at that time. There were 5 or 6 regional languages. Also, since the Roman era it has been customary for individuals to be called diff names language to language. Ghengis Khan is actually Chengish Khan. I go by Joe in English. Jose in Spanish. Yusef in Farsi. Abu Yaqub in Iraqi. Bazgul in Pashto. Why do we do that? Because many non-native speakers of a given language will struggle with pronouncing foreign names. And the lowest common denominators in terms of the English speaking population would pronpunce that French name like a pair of jeans if they saw it written.
@@write-only Every history channel pronounces the last caliphate as the Ottoman Empire. In Turkush Ottoman is Osman, a name that still exists. Do you get my point?
@@write-only Jesus Christ is actually Yeshua. Are you seeing my point? Only the French would be so pedantic. And the reason you are pedantic is because of Napoleon and his Code. I explained that already. Look it up.
Man this young kid Philippe ( at 28:50) sure was something but I doubt we will hear from him again. He will probably never become the head of a rising dukedom and establish a new noble house rivaling and maybe overshadowing even France and the Emperor in its power or wealth :D
Dang, 6 ads really sucks. If everyone watched 2-3 ads that would help me a lot, but 6... ho-lee-fuk. Thanks for sticking it out though, much appreciated.
Charles the Bad was actually John II's uncle in law, as Charles's older sister Blanche of Navarre had been married to the late King Philip VI. Funny enough she was originally supposed to be married to John when he was still the Dauphin, but that all changed when his father got the hots for her and promptly broke off her engagement with his son to wed her instead. Charles the Bad often joked about how John II almost became his brother in law, but instead became his step nephew in law.
The Black Princes finest hour! One of the proudest accomplishments of the Plantagenets and one of the greatest humillations of france as a whole! Love your work 🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤❤❤
@@Flo-pl5mg Edward the Black prince was English, the closest thing to a civil war would be the American Revolution that is usually portrayed as the Americans against the British..
@@Flo-pl5mg It’s debatable when English and even french were established as identities but by this point the nobility were English- Edward is an English name for example,
Charles in french is pronounced 'shArl' (the es is kinda silent and more to direct the pronunciationof the last syllable, emphasis on the ARRLL and stop on the L)
yes, it's nice to practice French when using French names etc. but note that the peculiar "French R" hadn't evolved in the Middle Ages. It only came in the late 1600s...
🚩 Try Speakly for FREE for 7 days, and get a 60% discount if you join the annual subscription. speakly.app.link/historymarche
Your 100 years war work is on a whole new level man! Could You consider doing the Siege of Vienna of 1683?
I'm so glad you remade this battle from five years ago.
If you can please do battle of Velbuzhd,your work and videos are great :)
It's okay ! Most of the name have a good pronunciation. It's just somewhat strange for us, Jeanne d'arc to Joanne of arc, or Jean to John. But your vidéo are perfect, thank you !
The video that made me subscribed to the channel 5 years ago. ⚔️🛡️
I've heard of this battle and King John's capture for years. But did not know his 14 old son was present with him at his capture! Well done!
It was mostly for this that his dad rewarded him with the duchy of Burgundy
can't imagine any of todays royals fighting like the Black Prince and his noble friends...and hats off to the French. .King Jean and his young son and his nobles. .todays Charles wouldn't lift a finger to save this country as he has thrown away 100's of years culture and history as long as people bow and curtsey ..sold Christianity out to appeal to the Muslims and non English.
@@shaunwalker2557let’s be honest, the French have had war PTSD since WW2 🤷🏽♂️😂 and then having to watch the United States (the country they once controlled) be given the glory had to hurt lol
@@MrBubblecakethe French were absolute pillars in WW1 and basically fought to a stalemate most of the way through. In WW2, the army was broken far too quickly to really make an impact but their civilians did the bulk of the groundwork for the invasion of Normandy to allow the allies to free their home. While lots of people talk down on the French from that time period, I have always acknowledged that both wars might have been lost without the sacrifice of a ton of French people. Not all of us believe our military was the only reason the enemy was beaten.
21:40 just my opinion, but it seems to me as though the decision to feign a retreat towards the river was a clever move. Not only does the Earl of Warwick entice the enemy into their initial charge, but once his troops wheel about to engage the enemy, he manages their repositioning, so that an out flanking option is no longer available to the French, as the English battle line runs to the marsh, PLUS the archers final position winds up being in that marsh, where they are well protected from cavalry.
None of these things existed whilst Warwicks division remained where it initially stood.
True, it was good trap
Classic Norman Tactic.
Fr it pretty much won the battle cus eliminated a whole division with little resistance
Man you know what you’re talking about ! Impressive !!
This one step back as invitation... not new there. But enough french commanders and enough of the soldiers were there not intelligent enough in tactics or too intelligent for anti fight egoism.
Unbelievable this acting. It was a bloody gift to the invaders.
It's great that History Marche acknowledge they butcher french words. An honest blogger. I won't regret subbing.
There is a gap between 1356 and 1415 not covered by the series.
And thank you for this great effort.
Working on the gap ;)
Read about the Sack of Alexandria in 1365. There was a "Crusade".
Medieval commanders with proper scouting? Impossible I say!
You know nothing I say...
"That's soldiering" i say!
*Robert the Bruce has entered the chat*
@@steamedpunk13 yeah nah. Methven remember?
They need UAVs 😂😂
I can feel myself envious of the Black Prince: hmmmm, what do I get my dad for Christmas? Oh, I know - I'll expand Gascony by nearly double, and bring the French King home as a prize. Easy, peasy.
Me: I hope my dad likes this card.
In fact, the gascons wants to keep Jean 2 prisoner at Bordeaux and it was Edward 3 who forced the black prince against his wish to bring him to London leading the black prince to compensate the gascons.
The consequences were that the black prince lose the gascons trust and Gascony wassn't expand until 1360 with the Bretigny treaty but it was a step back from the London treaty in 1358 (never accepted by the Valois) because of the failure by Edward 3 chevauchée in 1359-1360
Amazing video! It really shows how terrain is important when facing a heavy cavalry force, the french were defeated the same way they were in crecy and the same way the parthians were defeated by ventidius at mount gindarus. You guys should remake crecy btw! Keep up the good work!
Ventidius was an insane general
poitiers plays out very different compared to crecy
@@vincentknatz7993 i meant to highlight the importance of terrain rather than a 1 to 1 comparison
It's always about the terrain and communication.
Thanks
The attention to detail is amazing 😀
Thank you so much for the kind words and for supporting my work. Making videos isn't cheap so every dollar counts. Very kind of you!
I would pay very good money to see HM cover the wars of South America. There arent many military history channels here, and definitely nowhere close in quality. I really hope it happens one day, they're all very interesting conflicts
From what time period might I ask
Incredible documentary as usual. I learn something new each time!
Thank you for this! I don't know how long the video lasts but Schwerpunkt uploaded a 3 hours tactical analysis of Poitiers that I prepotently recommend
If you look at the bottom of any TH-cam video, there is a time display bar which informs you of the length of the video.
It was another wonderful historical coverage video shared by an amazing ( History Marche) channel about Poitiers' battle between French kingdom and Anglogascon invaders on French territory at 1356 AD..where English long bow had obvious role for English gaining victory ✌️ while French utilized short Bows and bad controlling of French warriors columns brought defeat to French campaign....thank you (History Marche ) channel for sharing this incredible work
I'm surprised how the French didn't focus special attention on the English longbow men before any front line engagement. These English units proved time and again to be the most dangerous yet the French repeated the same mistakes. Can anyone explain if maybe I am wrong?
No the french learned overtime and to be fair the English longbowmen were brilliant when in good terrain or defence. If they weren’t supported or their defences weren’t ready they could be overrun due to their lack of armour.
One of the main reasons French knights didn't focus on longbowmen is because most knights wanted to capture enemy nobility so that they could earn a ransom. Ransoms were extremely profitable and a key incentive for fighting in war at the time. Many poorer knights needed ransoms in order to finance the money they spent to go off to war. However longbowmen were not nobility, so they weren't worth a ransom and thus French knights sought to fight English knights instead of longbowmen. Essentially there was a strong financial reason to only focus on the English knights.
They wanted adventure, glory and fortune like their Frankish ancestors in Charlemagne's times or Crusades for example, because they were raised on the Songs and Epics, of Roland or King Arthur, and even Troubadours's love songs (in chivalric way). It was particularly successful among the Nobility, because the values of chivalry were born in France, or the Medieval French (and Occitan) speaking world in general (particularly, Counties of Toulouse, Provence or Duchies of Aquitaine, Burgundy and Normandy, plus Norman's Sicily ).
This is why most, including the youngest, were so eager to fight first, but in the old feudal mentality, while the world had already changed. The Plantagenet Army modernized more, especially after the wars against the Scots, where they saw that the old tactics of chivalry alone were no longer enough.
Then in the 15th century, it will be the opposite, Charles VII will promote a more modern army, where the Plantagenets will remain cemented in the ancient tactics of the Longbowmen, which worked before.
Another big reason i think is that they saw it beneath themselves to charge, what in their minds were, "peasants". Chivalry took presedence over consideration on how to best win the battle.
Not an exact fit.. yet I can't help comparing the inflexibility of many WW1 Generals..
The graphics on the maps do make following events a bit easier reading thehistory with a map available is much mure confusing. This presentation is like setting out terrain and miniatures, which is my preferred methodv for situation as complex as this. Well done! --Bob Bailey in Maine
Of course I watched this suspension story in full, as I never heard these kind of details in my history lessons. Thank you!
Amazing work on this classic, you've come a long way over these few years. Keep up the great work. Ive always enjoyed studying the 100 Years War😊
Great! more Hundred years' war! love this series!
Love the long videos and consistency of your videos. Please keep up the great work!
Bernard Cornwell wrote about this campaign in his book 1356. Its excellent. As is his Azincourt (Agincourt). Both are well worth a read.
What a great series! ⚔🔥🏹
Very well done. I enjoyed it immensely.
The French defeat at Poitiers is a very clear and useful example of how command and control broke down on the behalf of the French army in respect of the early cavalry charges and then the uncoordinated and unsupported attacks of separate battiles against the Anglo-Gascon lines. Leaving ripe for the plucking and defeat when superior command and control on the part of the Anglo-Gascon's leadership and tactical responses to the French moves, enabled them to make the most of their opportunities to score a decisive victory, with that double cavalry envelopment at the end.
I love hearing about The Hundred Years War. It's just so interesting.
This shall be my sacrifice to the comment algorithm! I may not be able to tune in to watch these all the time when they come out, but I will always watch the videos you cover on historical battles.
Excellent video! Thank you!
I learned of the Battle of Poitiers from reading the "Chivalry" series by Christian Cameron (an historical fiction). The first book covers the Battle of Poitiers, as well as many of the years following. The second book covers the Sack of Alexandria.
I like the fact the Black Prince have a Sassy response al the Time! hahaha Thanks for the wonderful work again. Cheers Mate! 🥂
Any day we get a new history marche vid is a good day.
The Black Prince was the OG pro gamer
Hey HistoryMarche while you're at it ... please do next on the two Barons Revolts and a compilation of the 100 Years War ...
Looking forward to it ❤️💙🤜🍻🤛
@HistoryMarche You guys scored with David McCallion doing the narration. How do I make arrangements for him to read my eulogy when I die? Great channel, It is immensely informative about my research topic on human psychology. Keep up the great work team!
Poggle! Another HistoryMarche banger
Love the seamless link to the speakly Add.
Wow! What a great vid! I could not stop watching. Thank you soo much for your hard work
Dear Mr.H.Marche, would you consider making an audio book?
After watching many of these battles, its amazing how the french attacks always seem to be so disorganized, how they constantly attacked when the english were in such a superior position, and how they failed to attack the longbowmen
Always worthwhile thanks!
Good video.
Wow great UPDATE to the old Poitiers video!!
1 Million!! Congrats!
Excellent presentation and carefully accurate. The only thing is that the so-called “Black Prince” was never called by that name while he lived and for manny years after. This name was a construct of later writers. That aside, I commend you on an excellent and well presented animation and narration. Well done!!! - Rev ChristopherT. Jenkins
Thank you. Great content.
I wonder how the Edwardian phase influenced the position of Aquitainians after the region was incorporated into Valois territory
Also really interested in Carolingian phase of the war.
As always great video with a lot of details
Beautiful presentation. Very interesting
Thank you as always great stuff!
I could watch this series 100 times and it still wouldn't get old! I wonder what direction the HYW would've taken if the Black Prince didn't die so young?!
It's been a long time since I studied the HYW but I suspect the structural issues that lead to England's eventual defeat would still have panned out the same way.
England still wouldn't have been able to pay for and maintain its garrisons; the occupied territories would always have remained just that - occupied, not assimilated; the disparate, culturally French, factions would still have eventually united to drive out the English. England had no shortage of inspiring, skilled commanders after Edward, but they were never able to field armies on the same scale as the French or wield the same financial muscle.
@@Jack-xg1kg That sounds about right. Leaders can do a certain amount to draw in funds and gather allies, provide high-level political momentum to maintain wars, but there's a limit to it. The only way the HYW could have ended any other way would be if the black prince stuck around long enough to intimidate the french into an unconditional surrender, since outright beating of a kingdom the size of france wasn't ever really on the cards unless a lot of french nobles switched sides.
@@spamhonx56 The Black prince died in 1376 (46 years old) while the Valois reconquest was between 1369 and 1375.
In 1358, the 2nd London treaty gave Edward 3 half of france but un 1375, the only Edward continental possessions were Bayonne, Bordeaux, Brest and Calais (less than before the war) while the black prince was still in command.
When the black prince died, it was only the final nail in the coffin and the tide has turn a long time before.
Even if the black prince has survived, the Plantagenet were already on the losing end and the Black prince will ruled for 10 years (20 at best).
What really hurts Eward 3 and the black prince was Charles 5 coronation in 1364 and the death of many great english commanders in the 1360s like Henry of grosmont in 1361 or John Chandos in 1369.
Beautiful upload to come home to after school
Remake of an older video. Love it!
I don't quite understand though why these commanders, like french in this instance, didn't try to utilize more of their force at once. Why the piece-meal attacks? And if you're going to do waves of attacks, why not schedule them more closely together?
The main reason is that French command over the army wasn't absolute, lot of knights and subcommanders acting independantly. It stopped only in the last decades of Hundred years war, when France had finally a more professionnal army and a lot of artillery, and won.
In the medieval era, low/local nobles have to fund themselves in war and with the big winter 1315-1317 and the black plague 1347-1351, many farmers who survived moved to cities while local nobles have less money with less people to tax and their only way to keep a decent income was war with ransom, that means you have to make another noble prisoner yourself and you can't if the men in arms made the jobs themselves.
Another reason is Valois kings ruled only since 1328 and unlike Capetiens (who have also few power from 987-1180), they have to gained respect from nobility and people and are unlicky enough to deal with war since 1337 and many defeats in a row since 1345.
The duty from nobles at the time is to protect the peasants who will fund their lavish lives in return.
Because the chevauchees made so damages and french nobles have been incompetent since 1345, they have to fight and each one fight for his own glory instead to focus on winning the battle
Communication and visibility were a limiting factor. Battle plans would be drawn up but each commander would move at their own discretion.
here is my sacrifice great vid guys.
Good stuff...keep it up.
A videogame with theese things are rally beautyfoul
Excellent, thank you.
can't wait for the next video of the series
Superb work , kept it up ❤
another great video thanks :)
I would like you to do the Battle of Khotyn - the Ottoman Empire and their allies against the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the Zaproscy Cossacks 😊😊
Yes Please. I'd like to see some East-European battles again. It's been a while.
Yes
Ahh! Poor poland, which had to pay taxes to the Ottomans
Great video. Keep it up!!
Flipping epic
When will the next video in The Anarchy series be released? Really enjoyed it!
Great video!!
French Knights charging into the fray and getting obliterated case no. 28.
Funnily enough, it worked almost every time. This channel just over focuses on their few defeats. France had the best and most numerous knights in Europe, in an age where heavy cavalry was the meta.
Just never when it counted
@@dentkort That's really it honestly, so often are they used to simply steam rolling their enemies with sheer French chivalric mass that even when every sign says their better of staying put or waiting it out, somehow they still throw out all better thinking and charge anyway. Hey if it works almost all the time there's no way it could go wrong just this once right?
There is a bigger list of French victories where the use of mass cavalry charges had decisive effects
Thanks for video. ❤
I love your videos! One minor note: sometimes the script jumps abruptly between past and present tenses, and it can be jarring - just something to consider when proofreading.
I hate it. It's like the script writer had never written before.
For a guy named "Boucicault", he fought surprisingly bravely.
Excellent work here Gentlemen.
I'll never understand why medieval kings loved sitting around with a massive reserve watching their first wave slowly dwindling instead of ever moving to encircle and overwhelm one of the flanks.
Probably because the first wave usually contained inexperienced units and would be easily defeated leaving the attackers without a centre.
I think the plan was to weaken the defenders and wear them out before committing the experienced soldiers, aiming to break through the enemy's centre
Coming from videos on Hannibal's exploits in second punic war, seeing the tactics here feels almost amateurish
Great video
Awesome thanks
I have so many questions, how come you send in one "LINE" of footmen and just chill for 2 hours?!
If you send more they would just be chilling while in range of the archers
Good, thank you.
thank you
Hi there HistoryMarche.
First i would like to say that as a History buff, I absolutely love your work and dedication to it through the years, keep them coming lads !
That being said, as a frenchman, I would like to point out that, as you say, you do butcher some prononciations of our french words, just like no french people is able to say "worcestershire sauce" correctly, and it's no problem. But when it comes to key figures of the time, none of our monarchs were named John (\ˈdʒɑn\), but rather Jean (/ʒɑ̃/).
Then again, love your work, just some small constructive criticism.
Only a French person would be so pedantic. Trace it back to the codification of your language during the implementation of the Napoleonic Code.
There is no right way in language. It constantly evolves. Your conception of "proper pronunciation" is only as old as the French Revolution.
Just some constructive criticism about having some perspective on your own culture and history.
@@write-only The concept of French didn't encompass the whole of France at that time. There were 5 or 6 regional languages.
Also, since the Roman era it has been customary for individuals to be called diff names language to language. Ghengis Khan is actually Chengish Khan.
I go by Joe in English. Jose in Spanish. Yusef in Farsi. Abu Yaqub in Iraqi. Bazgul in Pashto. Why do we do that? Because many non-native speakers of a given language will struggle with pronouncing foreign names.
And the lowest common denominators in terms of the English speaking population would pronpunce that French name like a pair of jeans if they saw it written.
@@write-only Every history channel pronounces the last caliphate as the Ottoman Empire. In Turkush Ottoman is Osman, a name that still exists.
Do you get my point?
@@write-only To be clear, Osman is a first name.
@@write-only Jesus Christ is actually Yeshua. Are you seeing my point?
Only the French would be so pedantic. And the reason you are pedantic is because of Napoleon and his Code. I explained that already. Look it up.
Great video.
Man this young kid Philippe ( at 28:50) sure was something but I doubt we will hear from him again. He will probably never become the head of a rising dukedom and establish a new noble house rivaling and maybe overshadowing even France and the Emperor in its power or wealth :D
Loved this. But TH-cam is losing its mind. I had to watch at least 6 advertisement breaks in the mobile app.
Dang, 6 ads really sucks. If everyone watched 2-3 ads that would help me a lot, but 6... ho-lee-fuk. Thanks for sticking it out though, much appreciated.
Where do you get your maps? Thanks
Charles the Bad was actually John II's uncle in law, as Charles's older sister Blanche of Navarre had been married to the late King Philip VI. Funny enough she was originally supposed to be married to John when he was still the Dauphin, but that all changed when his father got the hots for her and promptly broke off her engagement with his son to wed her instead. Charles the Bad often joked about how John II almost became his brother in law, but instead became his step nephew in law.
Amazing history
Awesome
lol my sacrafice to the algo! Nice history lesson.
Excellent
Amazing
You should expand to include the Iberian kingdoms role in the HYW.
The excitement of seeing a new vid is up and it's 30 mins!
The Black Princes finest hour! One of the proudest accomplishments of the Plantagenets and one of the greatest humillations of france as a whole! Love your work 🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤❤❤
It’s a shame he died, his leadership would have been far better than that of his son Richard.
@@Yellow-kp9gs that and that his first son died too
In fact the hundred years war is more a french civil war than english/french war :)
@@Flo-pl5mg Edward the Black prince was English, the closest thing to a civil war would be the American Revolution that is usually portrayed as the Americans against the British..
@@Flo-pl5mg It’s debatable when English and even french were established as identities but by this point the nobility were English- Edward is an English name for example,
Very nice
Edward the black prience "Eddi" looks like exactly like Mr. Bean in Blackadder
What a battle God
now where was count ademar stationed?
Charles in french is pronounced 'shArl' (the es is kinda silent and more to direct the pronunciationof the last syllable, emphasis on the ARRLL and stop on the L)
Amazes me that they could asssemble any armies following the Black Death only a few years previously.
Imagine the birth rate after that reached millions in few years and I don't have a woman or a kid. How the heck...?
"Names in French we butcher on occasion."
Mon dieu, he is not wrong.
As some one ho loves these videos, Yous needs a better map tracker. Idk who is who
great thanks , watch " Hallow Crown '
Battle of Chocim I'm still waiting for this battle 😍😍😍😍😍😍🙄🙄
Yes please
yes, it's nice to practice French when using French names etc. but note that the peculiar "French R" hadn't evolved in the Middle Ages. It only came in the late 1600s...
Much better than reading a dry history description.
very impressive. Love your diction