@@luigipellegrini92 Yes, to be honest I do not think the current Hierarchy were happy with the look that looked too much Russian, if that makes any sense and I would say you are bang on :0)
It is a technical wonder.... "Starting" of at £1.7b, rising to £2.9b by 2030. The whole Stadium lights up into 18 different colours, if they want it to, with tubes running down the sides of the concrete. It has air conditioning that can be piped through the whole stadium and even cools down the walls. It can also heat them, as well as the whole Stadium, up. It will have 17 toilets, compared to the 6 it has at the moment. 6 bars, 11 restaurants, each one serving a different type of food. The away ends and the home ends will be sealed off at each home game, so the two cannot mingle. You can see the whole pitch, no matter where you sit and their are no supporting beams that get in the way. Even the seats heat up in the Winter. There will be a UHD/3D Jumbotron at each end of the ground, piping each game live. The Underground Parking will be extended to hold an extra 2,000 cars, patrolled by 8 Security Guards and cctv. I would also like to point out that Chelsea are looking for a Stadium capacity of 85,000-100,000, by 2030. Anyone saying "it looks ugly", quite clearly has no idea what they are talking about.
@@3darq747 You are most welcome :0) Just a shame that you could not dig up more info for the video, but there is not a lot of it about, for the pure and simple reason, CFC do not know yet if that is the final plan. I work for CFC :0) Although the plans are in place, it "might" not take place because Boehly and Co are still looking at other Sites, looking for an easier, less expensive option. The problem for Chelsea, is space. To make the space, as it stands, Chelsea have to buy more properties and land, not to mention everything they do must go through Hammersmith and Fulham Council and they really are a pain in the butt, as they are the sort of Council who hate change. Having said that, like ALL Council's, money talks. It is such a shame that the land Battersea Power Station did not materialise, that would have been ideal. No Owner, no matter how rich, has a bottomless pit. Unlike the Fans, who would quite happily spend their last penny on seeing their Football Club win trophies, Owners are Businessmen first and foremost and that is understandable and although it is clear that, like Abramovich, Boehly and Co care for the Club and all that goes with it, but the bottom line is "profit" and Boehly and Co have already spent over £6b, couple that with another "possible" £3b for the Stadium and new Players still to come in, that is a lot of mula to dish out. Also, a lot of Players will be leaving come Summer. The wage budget is ridiculous, as is the Chelsea Squad. I feel sorry for Potter. I am not sure that most people understand how difficult his job is at this time. That Chelsea Squad is 34 at the moment, that is 3 Teams. Training is a nightmare. The 1st Team, Reserves, Players coming back from injuries, plus fringe Youth Players ALL have to train together, other than the day, or two before a game. That works out to 60-65 Players. Can you imagine how difficult it is to talk tactics/formations/who should be doing what, not to mention 5 a side training games, Defence vs Attack, etc. 28 of those Players are 1st Team Players and most expect to start every Game and obviously that is not possible, so you get unhappy Players. Aubamyeang, understandably, Cucurella and quite a few Players, especially in Defence and Midfield are unhappy because they are not starting and unhappy Players is never a good thing, but what the hell do you do? Players that will be gone come next Season.... Pulisic, Ziyech, Aubameyang, Mendy, Gallagher, Cheek. Players "possibly" gone, come next Season....Kante, if he does not sign that new contract and his injury proneness does not change,. Havertz, if playing as a No.10 does not have him producing, which is where he wants to play and he himself has said, he is not a No.9, but then we can all see that. Mount and it does not look like he wants to sign that new contract, which would be a shame. The stumbling block is the length of that contract and Mount does not want it to be that long. Sterling, for all sorts of reasons, the main being, how many Players Chelsea now have that can play in the same positions and is Sterling as good as, or better than them, although I do think he lights the game up when he plays and lets face it, that Forward line, other than Sterling and Felix, at this time, would be more suited giving Donkey Rides on Southend Beach. Azpilicueta, it depends whether he wants to stay for another Season, Broja ( I think definitely, but is still being thought about), and possibly Chalobah, which I personally would say that would be a shame as I do like him and he can play several positions. Odoi and the rest that have been loaned out, 1st Team wise. I think that just about covers it. Chelsea also have a deal that is being discussed leaning towards Name Branding the Stadium and it is huge!! It is going to eclipse what Man City got, but I cannot talk about it, other than that....sorry :0)
Wow, that's amazing, I have some questions in order to make my 3D model more in line with "reality". if you don't mind send me an email, it's in the info window in the channel, so I can ask you some questions about some features that I haven't put in my model. normally I like to inform myself before making stadiums, like I did with the bernabeu.... but as it's not official there's almost no information and my goal is to make videos as realistic as possible.
@@3darq747 Sorry, no can do. I would love to help you, and I do appreciate that you want to make your Threads as realistic and as informative as possible and good for you, but I can only give you so much and I certainly cannot divulge information privately, over an email. There are clauses in every contract Chelsea hand out and that would most certainly be breaking regulations. Great win tonight though, wasn't it :0)
@@neovarleydownes9109 what a win yesterday, I totally understand and i apologise if something i said has disturb you. I wanted to aks where and how are the lights going to be and where are going to be placed the jumbotron, thanks a lot for your help you really help me with my future project about this stadium, im really thankful (:
It’s one of those designs that doesn’t look good in visualisations, but I bet when it’s built it would look great and it’s unique too. Last 20 years everyone building the same new stadiums, they all look the same.
Amen to that. This Stadium also has a lot of advantages that other Stadiums do not, with a lot of technical wonders, never done, or seen before. Every one of them designed to make it more comfortable and accessible for the Fan, which is unusual in its self.
Am I allowed to say I don't like it. My issue is it looks very final and doesn't seem to allow for future change if and when required. Just saying, plus if I'm honest😢 and I'm sorry but the Spurs ground looks better and is bigger. The idea is to maximise the revenue so why only 60000. Doesn't stick me as anything but average. 😢
Oh god, not this design again - it looks awful.....like a Bond villain's ' evil lair'. As a Chelsea fan, can't the club come up with a completely new design........and not one that's a 'hangover' from the Abramovich era. Also, why does the club feel it necessary to spend between 1 to 2 billion pounds on a new stadium?? It's obscene. Chelsea should try and instead design the 'greenest' stadium in England - not one that's the most resource intensive of any stadium ever.
1. It is a technical wonder. 2. it is a design to accommodate the Fan entirely. 3. Anyone saying: "it looks awful" clearly has no idea what it will look like up close and from the inside, or any clue as to what they are talking about. 4. You will be able to see all of the inside, wherever you stand inside and all of the outside for the same reason. It will be light and airy, which is more than can be said for any other Stadium where they need lights on even during the day, because it is too dark inside. 5. You can go get a drink, etc, and miss none of the action because you can see the whole pitch from any angle, there will even be TV's built into the wall in the toilets, so you miss none of the action, if caught short. 6. It will be cool in the Summer and warm in the Winter, even every seat will be heated. It will have Jumbotrons, which everyone, no matter where you sit, will be able to see. 7. Despite the roof being open the rain will not get onto the pitch, because the structure of the Stadium will actually be able to "suck" the water into the brickwork and expel it back out again, into an irrigation system. 8. As the second video on this Thread shows, the brickwork lights up with all sorts of different coloured lights and looks fantastic. I have also explained the Jumbotron and Floodlight system to 2D ARQ. There are other technical wonders, inside and outside, with lots of ascetic sights to come, including atatues oif former great Chelsea and Managers. Now, what the hell is wrong with that.
So much futuristic looking stadiums out there, i mean look at the emirates, the Alianz and we go back Colosseum designs. fuck. Doesnt look like a lions den fit for a Pride, looks like something a spider crawled out from if you ask me. Ditch it!
Lleva currada eh, si lo has dibujado desde cero. Mi recomendación es que tomes la secuancias de video y las montes en premiere u otro editor de video. Intenta contar una "historia". Yo eso es lo que hago, me adapto al ritmo musical.
Please create an original and creative vision of Old Trafford. Someone did a video a couple of weeks ago and it already has almost 700k views but those are very basic, I think if want you could do better, something more than just a silver plate.
@@3darq747 Thank you so much for asking. If you ask AI to redesign Old Trafford you will get some good ideas. I did it and some but not all of the results where good. 1. I think you should maintain the same colors, materials Old Trafford have today, probably add new features but don't abandon completely the current architectural style. 2. Expand the smaller stand, the Sir Alex Ferguson stand is 3 tier and if new owners are ambitious they will make all of the stadium 3 tiers, the third tier is smaller but even so it is important for capacity increase with that third tier taking the capacity to near or 100k like Camp Nou. 3. Whatever the club decided (rebuilt or expansion) we know the roof will be replaced, design a new roof if possible but don't forget the current style, you can make better and modern but currently the design of Old Trafford's main entrance have the roof coming out of the structure and it's an integral part of the architecture, implement the same thing, the roof coming out of the structure, don't hide the roof like other stadiums do from the outside. 4. Don't remove the higher corners. 2/4 sides of the stadium have those silver higher corners with the stairs, maintain them whatever design you, if you make the stadium higher then make the corners even higher too. People don't realize but that is a important feature of Old Trafford, no other stadium have that, normally they have hidden or circular stairways like the Etihad and San Siro. 5. You can play with a lot of the stadium even with everything I suggested you maintained as a style. For example you can make a panoramic window and a smaller than the rest stand on the east stand, the stand ends and there is a space with bars and restaurants with a panoramic window of Manchester. This is similar to the Mercedes-Benz Arena in Atlanta, GA but much smaller. The view of the city centre from there is beautiful! The collums that sustain the roof in that part can be used to hang giant banners or flags of the club like the facade of the Sir Alex Ferguson Stand can. Don't forget the flags of the countries that the players come from. Those flags are in the roof of Old Trafford. 6. Man Utd owns much of the land arround Old Trafford so don't forget to use that. You can do a second smaller stadium for the woman's team and the academy and maybe more green spaces or some football pitches for training. That's an extra thing, not as important as a good design of Old Trafford. I know you asked about the facade but I hope some of my other suggestions where valid. Thank you so much for the work you do. I wish you success, peace and health.
@@mpumelelobeyers957 erm nope. Chelsea the club won 2 CL and 2 europa league. At least Chelsea had and have an owner who cares. Wtf is stan kroenke LMAO 🤡🤡🤡
@@hassymiia6267 Well spotted, that is the look they are going for and not because of "Roman" Abramovich lol If anyone knew how to build, it was the Romans :0)
@@parklane8315 EVERYTHING, is right with it and as I have already explained, many times, but what you have not done is explain why YOU think it is so bad. All you have done is what a lot do on here, insult, but do not give reasons why, which is a complete waste of time...is that maybe because nothing you do to explain your view would make sense, I wonder. All you are seeing is the brickwork, you are not seeing anything else and you are also not seeing the brickwork for what it really is. This new Stadium actually gives more natural light "inside" the building, than any other Stadium in the World and close up, is actually very pleasing to the eye. It is not just brickwork, it has art woven into it. Patterns, important scores from Chelsea Games gone by, names of past and present Players and is actually quite cleverly done, it also lights up, which I have stated and 3D ARQ has shown in his second vid, so I fail to see what is wrong with it all.
It lights up into 18 different colours, if they want it to. I would also like to point out that Chelsea are looking for a Stadium capacity of 85,000-100,000, by 2030, so chill :0)
@@baroznoma2056 You are right, the space is the problem, which is why they are still looking at other possible Sites to build on, which is why there is not much info on the new Stadium, because they are still not sure if it will go ahead, or not, so basically its: "watch this space" lol
You are another one, so let me repeat....It lights up into 18 different colours, if they want it to. I would also like to point out that Chelsea are looking for a Stadium capacity of 85,000-100,000, by 2030, so chill :0)
@@baroznoma2056 I agree, it just looks like a load of rock lined up together, but with the lights on, it looks marvellous, in the day, or at night. It is also perfect from a working capacity. I have given a description, on this Thread, about the Stadium and its workings and why build it in this fashion :0) if you look at Bayern's Allianz Arena, although a bit more aesthetically pleasing, it still looks like a load pf plastic welded together, but oh boy, when those lights go on, it is a whole different ball game. So try and picture Stamford Bridge in the same way. www.google.com/search?client=opera&sxsrf=AJOqlzVDdMHXhbXrHLYgqinR2hq8pLXQTQ:1678205082221&q=neon+lights+on+a+building&tbm=isch&source=univ&fir=jJvpshSFdwkHpM%252ClgZQVrlGxkC4VM%252C_%253B6orkqzzxzL7_bM%252CySdL2Oh_3qO1IM%252C_%253BqA-zOeQwVpaokM%252Cnv4PbGgw1Y4tLM%252C_%253Bn6TIOEsKq4y2GM%252CEK2gXF2yUri--M%252C_%253BVgDA6RW4kVoTCM%252C_lppaPSmvXDf5M%252C_%253B4w8ZglhMPg-dzM%252CZ3KYLGsZH66K6M%252C_%253Bu19gBC-3EB3l8M%252C_j5STqx7FtoX0M%252C_%253Bc67FzoM0Hbcp4M%252CRelsg02AQGcljM%252C_%253BV0fgz-UWJMN3XM%252CLfsI8RwgK70TlM%252C_%253BSLKic1eaNe-JtM%252CZ3KYLGsZH66K6M%252C_%253BnR_gSZFvJm_LVM%252CFzPMdZ2ZyyGM_M%252C_%253BvodSgDZklcdOpM%252CRVMEY8YOPv-4wM%252C_%253BA5hDz9h3RXPcUM%252CRuXiELEc32fLjM%252C_%253BJLTAn0cC8oNQqM%252CkqwxBxfnd7_C8M%252C_&usg=AI4_-kTgiv-B-Su24IsfNLnT8oWiyJnMZw&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjqyqSOmcr9AhVJhlwKHZO4CtkQjJkEegQICBAC&biw=1688&bih=819&dpr=1.1 Look at some of the buildings and you will see what I mean.
@@natoslayer2907 Sorry, but I would have to strongly disagree with that. I love the Allianz Arena, but even I have to say, THE best, most electrifying and grandest Stadium I have ever been to, is The Maracana Stadium in Brazil. I was going on 6 years old and I was there for the Brazil vs. Uruguay match in the World Cup Final on the 16th June, 1950, when it had a capacity of 199,854 and I have never known anything like it since. 6, or 60, the Stadium just takes your breath away and the atmosphere I have not experienced since and I have been to some revelries in my time. 70 odd years on, I can close my eyes and still see it, still smell it and still hear it, so although The Santiago Bernabéu Stadium is a grand Lady and quite the Stadium, but for me, nothing and I mean nothing, beats The Maracana Stadium, not even the Bernabéu, or the Allianz :0) The Azteca, Mexico and The Rungrado Stadium, North Korea are quite the sight too. But then I guess we all have our opinions as to what is.
An incredible architectural piece...
The design looks great but this was the stadium upgrade plan under Roman. It might have changed now with the club under new ownership.
Your "Roman" is a lackey of a war criminal.
It is the same, just with a lot more pieces added :0)
The one that roman planned looked more gothic russian orthodox church like. This one is a modern design.
@@luigipellegrini92 Yes, to be honest I do not think the current Hierarchy were happy with the look that looked too much Russian, if that makes any sense and I would say you are bang on :0)
England will also be playing their international matches at the new Stamford Bridge stadium.
They are changing the field sizes to the UEFA rules?
Thanks for the plans Chelsea needs to be renovated
I agree.
A top Club needs a top Stadium, with certainly more of a crowd capacity.
Nice, pride of london.
อดใจรอ...อีกหน่อยน่ะครับ....ทางบอร์ดบริหาร...กำลังเจรจาพื้นที่รอบๆ สนามอยู่...ทุกอย่างไปในทางบวกครับ...
คุณพูดถูกและจะดูสวยงามเมื่อทำเสร็จแล้ว :0)
Beauriful
新オーナーはこのプロジェクトを完成させる事を本気で実行します。
先ず土地の買収。これ本当に必要な金額を近隣に払い買い取るつもりです。
多少チェルシーが優勝出来なくなる時期があってもチェルシーファンは耐えてもらいたい。
この素晴らしい新スタジアムを手に入れてくれ。
それは現オーナーじゃないとおそらく無理です。
アーメン :0)
Красиво
Đẹp❤❤❤
NO ITS NOT this is old projekt when Abramowicz was the owner now new owners get new designers to design new stadium ;)
The pitch is owned by the fans so will have to developed or built around the existing pitch
I really like it. We are a big club. We need to have a bigger stadium.
Plastic club
@@hassymiia6267 Jealousy kills
@@Nasserist1969 plastic blue
Jealous? About wot.
Thought I was the only one to notice✌🏽
It is a technical wonder....
"Starting" of at £1.7b, rising to £2.9b by 2030.
The whole Stadium lights up into 18 different colours, if they want it to, with tubes running down the sides of the concrete.
It has air conditioning that can be piped through the whole stadium and even cools down the walls.
It can also heat them, as well as the whole Stadium, up.
It will have 17 toilets, compared to the 6 it has at the moment.
6 bars, 11 restaurants, each one serving a different type of food.
The away ends and the home ends will be sealed off at each home game, so the two cannot mingle.
You can see the whole pitch, no matter where you sit and their are no supporting beams that get in the way.
Even the seats heat up in the Winter.
There will be a UHD/3D Jumbotron at each end of the ground, piping each game live.
The Underground Parking will be extended to hold an extra 2,000 cars, patrolled by 8 Security Guards and cctv.
I would also like to point out that Chelsea are looking for a Stadium capacity of 85,000-100,000, by 2030.
Anyone saying "it looks ugly", quite clearly has no idea what they are talking about.
@neovarleydownes9109 thanks for the support, where did you get that information?, it will be very helpful for next videos about the stadium :)
@@3darq747 You are most welcome :0)
Just a shame that you could not dig up more info for the video, but there is not a lot of it about, for the pure and simple reason, CFC do not know yet if that is the final plan.
I work for CFC :0)
Although the plans are in place, it "might" not take place because Boehly and Co are still looking at other Sites, looking for an easier, less expensive option.
The problem for Chelsea, is space.
To make the space, as it stands, Chelsea have to buy more properties and land, not to mention everything they do must go through Hammersmith and Fulham Council and they really are a pain in the butt, as they are the sort of Council who hate change.
Having said that, like ALL Council's, money talks.
It is such a shame that the land Battersea Power Station did not materialise, that would have been ideal.
No Owner, no matter how rich, has a bottomless pit.
Unlike the Fans, who would quite happily spend their last penny on seeing their Football Club win trophies, Owners are Businessmen first and foremost and that is understandable and although it is clear that, like Abramovich, Boehly and Co care for the Club and all that goes with it, but the bottom line is "profit" and Boehly and Co have already spent over £6b, couple that with another "possible" £3b for the Stadium and new Players still to come in, that is a lot of mula to dish out.
Also, a lot of Players will be leaving come Summer.
The wage budget is ridiculous, as is the Chelsea Squad.
I feel sorry for Potter.
I am not sure that most people understand how difficult his job is at this time.
That Chelsea Squad is 34 at the moment, that is 3 Teams.
Training is a nightmare.
The 1st Team, Reserves, Players coming back from injuries, plus fringe Youth Players ALL have to train together, other than the day, or two before a game.
That works out to 60-65 Players.
Can you imagine how difficult it is to talk tactics/formations/who should be doing what, not to mention 5 a side training games, Defence vs Attack, etc.
28 of those Players are 1st Team Players and most expect to start every Game and obviously that is not possible, so you get unhappy Players.
Aubamyeang, understandably, Cucurella and quite a few Players, especially in Defence and Midfield are unhappy because they are not starting and unhappy Players is never a good thing, but what the hell do you do?
Players that will be gone come next Season....
Pulisic, Ziyech, Aubameyang, Mendy, Gallagher, Cheek.
Players "possibly" gone, come next Season....Kante, if he does not sign that new contract and his injury proneness does not change,.
Havertz, if playing as a No.10 does not have him producing, which is where he wants to play and he himself has said, he is not a No.9, but then we can all see that.
Mount and it does not look like he wants to sign that new contract, which would be a shame.
The stumbling block is the length of that contract and Mount does not want it to be that long.
Sterling, for all sorts of reasons, the main being, how many Players Chelsea now have that can play in the same positions and is Sterling as good as, or better than them, although I do think he lights the game up when he plays and lets face it, that Forward line, other than Sterling and Felix, at this time, would be more suited giving Donkey Rides on Southend Beach.
Azpilicueta, it depends whether he wants to stay for another Season, Broja ( I think definitely, but is still being thought about), and possibly Chalobah, which I personally would say that would be a shame as I do like him and he can play several positions.
Odoi and the rest that have been loaned out, 1st Team wise.
I think that just about covers it.
Chelsea also have a deal that is being discussed leaning towards Name Branding the Stadium and it is huge!! It is going to eclipse what Man City got, but I cannot talk about it, other than that....sorry :0)
Wow, that's amazing, I have some questions in order to make my 3D model more in line with "reality". if you don't mind send me an email, it's in the info window in the channel, so I can ask you some questions about some features that I haven't put in my model. normally I like to inform myself before making stadiums, like I did with the bernabeu.... but as it's not official there's almost no information and my goal is to make videos as realistic as possible.
@@3darq747 Sorry, no can do.
I would love to help you, and I do appreciate that you want to make your Threads as realistic and as informative as possible and good for you, but I can only give you so much and I certainly cannot divulge information privately, over an email.
There are clauses in every contract Chelsea hand out and that would most certainly be breaking regulations.
Great win tonight though, wasn't it :0)
@@neovarleydownes9109 what a win yesterday, I totally understand and i apologise if something i said has disturb you. I wanted to aks where and how are the lights going to be and where are going to be placed the jumbotron, thanks a lot for your help you really help me with my future project about this stadium, im really thankful (:
I think they will change the design... No way Boehly would want to copy the same design during Roman era.
I'm old school Chelsea we should stay in sw6 that's our home fact enough said
What is new capacity?
It’s one of those designs that doesn’t look good in visualisations, but I bet when it’s built it would look great and it’s unique too. Last 20 years everyone building the same new stadiums, they all look the same.
Amen to that.
This Stadium also has a lot of advantages that other Stadiums do not, with a lot of technical wonders, never done, or seen before.
Every one of them designed to make it more comfortable and accessible for the Fan, which is unusual in its self.
Am I allowed to say I don't like it. My issue is it looks very final and doesn't seem to allow for future change if and when required. Just saying, plus if I'm honest😢 and I'm sorry but the Spurs ground looks better and is bigger. The idea is to maximise the revenue so why only 60000. Doesn't stick me as anything but average. 😢
Do fans want a new stadium or a team that wins?
Chelsea only need knew coach but not a knew stadium pls
outside looks nice but inside i dont like this, its looks to small idk
Esse projeto ainda está barrado na Justiça? Alguém sabe dizer?
Oh god, not this design again - it looks awful.....like a Bond villain's ' evil lair'. As a Chelsea fan, can't the club come up with a completely new design........and not one that's a 'hangover' from the Abramovich era.
Also, why does the club feel it necessary to spend between 1 to 2 billion pounds on a new stadium?? It's obscene.
Chelsea should try and instead design the 'greenest' stadium in England - not one that's the most resource intensive of any stadium ever.
1. It is a technical wonder.
2. it is a design to accommodate the Fan entirely.
3. Anyone saying: "it looks awful" clearly has no idea what it will look like up close and from the inside, or any clue as to what they are talking about.
4. You will be able to see all of the inside, wherever you stand inside and all of the outside for the same reason.
It will be light and airy, which is more than can be said for any other Stadium where they need lights on even during the day, because it is too dark inside.
5. You can go get a drink, etc, and miss none of the action because you can see the whole pitch from any angle, there will even be TV's built into the wall in the toilets, so you miss none of the action, if caught short.
6. It will be cool in the Summer and warm in the Winter, even every seat will be heated.
It will have Jumbotrons, which everyone, no matter where you sit, will be able to see.
7. Despite the roof being open the rain will not get onto the pitch, because the structure of the Stadium will actually be able to "suck" the water into the brickwork and expel it back out again, into an irrigation system.
8. As the second video on this Thread shows, the brickwork lights up with all sorts of different coloured lights and looks fantastic.
I have also explained the Jumbotron and Floodlight system to 2D ARQ.
There are other technical wonders, inside and outside, with lots of ascetic sights to come, including atatues oif former great Chelsea and Managers.
Now, what the hell is wrong with that.
@@neovarleydownes9109 really?
@@godwineneojo9543 I have no idea what that means.
I hope there are enough hitching posts for the fans horses.
Move to chelsea wembley stadium
terror
Where is this going to be because around the area our old stadium is it Dosent look like it’s enough space for all this 😭😭 it looks great tho
Este plan era de abramovich la de boehly va a ser muy diferente
It doesn’t look great. Something is missing there. I would love to see few more samples
th-cam.com/video/bNxaEpJWznQ/w-d-xo.html here it is! enjoy it
So much futuristic looking stadiums out there, i mean look at the emirates, the Alianz and we go back Colosseum designs. fuck. Doesnt look like a lions den fit for a Pride, looks like something a spider crawled out from if you ask me. Ditch it!
This was the Abramovich era,,
So so 😅
Lleva currada eh, si lo has dibujado desde cero. Mi recomendación es que tomes la secuancias de video y las montes en premiere u otro editor de video. Intenta contar una "historia". Yo eso es lo que hago, me adapto al ritmo musical.
Gracias por el consejo, la verdad es que me ha faltado sincronizar las imágenes al ritmo de la musica
All this changes just for the club to be coached Graham Potter 🚮
Please create an original and creative vision of Old Trafford. Someone did a video a couple of weeks ago and it already has almost 700k views but those are very basic, I think if want you could do better, something more than just a silver plate.
Im already finishing that project, the interior desing is already done, what would you like to see in the facade?
@@3darq747 Thank you so much for asking. If you ask AI to redesign Old Trafford you will get some good ideas. I did it and some but not all of the results where good.
1. I think you should maintain the same colors, materials Old Trafford have today, probably add new features but don't abandon completely the current architectural style.
2. Expand the smaller stand, the Sir Alex Ferguson stand is 3 tier and if new owners are ambitious they will make all of the stadium 3 tiers, the third tier is smaller but even so it is important for capacity increase with that third tier taking the capacity to near or 100k like Camp Nou.
3. Whatever the club decided (rebuilt or expansion) we know the roof will be replaced, design a new roof if possible but don't forget the current style, you can make better and modern but currently the design of Old Trafford's main entrance have the roof coming out of the structure and it's an integral part of the architecture, implement the same thing, the roof coming out of the structure, don't hide the roof like other stadiums do from the outside.
4. Don't remove the higher corners. 2/4 sides of the stadium have those silver higher corners with the stairs, maintain them whatever design you, if you make the stadium higher then make the corners even higher too. People don't realize but that is a important feature of Old Trafford, no other stadium have that, normally they have hidden or circular stairways like the Etihad and San Siro.
5. You can play with a lot of the stadium even with everything I suggested you maintained as a style. For example you can make a panoramic window and a smaller than the rest stand on the east stand, the stand ends and there is a space with bars and restaurants with a panoramic window of Manchester. This is similar to the Mercedes-Benz Arena in Atlanta, GA but much smaller. The view of the city centre from there is beautiful! The collums that sustain the roof in that part can be used to hang giant banners or flags of the club like the facade of the Sir Alex Ferguson Stand can. Don't forget the flags of the countries that the players come from. Those flags are in the roof of Old Trafford.
6. Man Utd owns much of the land arround Old Trafford so don't forget to use that. You can do a second smaller stadium for the woman's team and the academy and maybe more green spaces or some football pitches for training. That's an extra thing, not as important as a good design of Old Trafford.
I know you asked about the facade but I hope some of my other suggestions where valid. Thank you so much for the work you do. I wish you success, peace and health.
@@MattZaycYT Thanks, in a few weeks you will see the my project, i hope you like it :0)
Hey, im starting modeling the facade of old trafford, what would you like to see on it?
Overthinking design
Nonsense design
Shape unrelated to Chelsea image
I don't understand why Roman approved this shape.
Need a manager first ffs
Very ugly design concept and it doesn't improve the stadium capacity either...
No man. I’m a Chelsea fan. This is a horrible architectural design. Literally looks like giant straws clouding the stadium.
3050
It's not a good stadium, new owners must come with a new design...this stadium is whack to me
Fun fact ; London is red
Very funny. In Europa arsenal is shit 😂
Fun fact also; with 0 Champions Leagues and 0 Europa leagues 👏
@@jaimeleonguzman4328 Roman Ibramovic 2 CL Trophies; Chelsea 0!
@@dadangkoneloontheroad3737 Craven cottage stadium has more history thn you💀
@@mpumelelobeyers957 erm nope. Chelsea the club won 2 CL and 2 europa league. At least Chelsea had and have an owner who cares. Wtf is stan kroenke LMAO 🤡🤡🤡
who ever designed this must have been pissed at the time 🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Why would you make such a childish remark?
What is wrong with it.
shit like going back in roman empire times!
@@hassymiia6267 Well spotted, that is the look they are going for and not because of "Roman" Abramovich lol
If anyone knew how to build, it was the Romans :0)
@@neovarleydownes9109 WHAT IS RIGHT WITH IT ??????
@@parklane8315 EVERYTHING, is right with it and as I have already explained, many times, but what you have not done is explain why YOU think it is so bad.
All you have done is what a lot do on here, insult, but do not give reasons why, which is a complete waste of time...is that maybe because nothing you do to explain your view would make sense, I wonder.
All you are seeing is the brickwork, you are not seeing anything else and you are also not seeing the brickwork for what it really is.
This new Stadium actually gives more natural light "inside" the building, than any other Stadium in the World and close up, is actually very pleasing to the eye.
It is not just brickwork, it has art woven into it.
Patterns, important scores from Chelsea Games gone by, names of past and present Players and is actually quite cleverly done, it also lights up, which I have stated and 3D ARQ has shown in his second vid, so I fail to see what is wrong with it all.
That's ugly
That is so ugly. I am sure Chelsea could do better.
Sorry Chelsea it looks like a multi-storey carpark from the outside horrible will be crumbling away in ten years time.
🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮
You the 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
Bad Stadium. Chelsea New Stadium 65.000 or 70.000
It lights up into 18 different colours, if they want it to.
I would also like to point out that Chelsea are looking for a Stadium capacity of 85,000-100,000, by 2030, so chill :0)
@@neovarleydownes9109 Are you sure it will be 85,000 to 100,000 because the space is kinda limited?
@@baroznoma2056 You are right, the space is the problem, which is why they are still looking at other possible Sites to build on, which is why there is not much info on the new Stadium, because they are still not sure if it will go ahead, or not, so basically its: "watch this space" lol
Albania Kika you are a bad fan.
i hope this design gets ditched. its just grey and ugly
You are another one, so let me repeat....It lights up into 18 different colours, if they want it to.
I would also like to point out that Chelsea are looking for a Stadium capacity of 85,000-100,000, by 2030, so chill :0)
@@neovarleydownes9109 It doesn't look good. I hope Boehly has a new design
@@baroznoma2056 I agree, it just looks like a load of rock lined up together, but with the lights on, it looks marvellous, in the day, or at night.
It is also perfect from a working capacity.
I have given a description, on this Thread, about the Stadium and its workings and why build it in this fashion :0)
if you look at Bayern's Allianz Arena, although a bit more aesthetically pleasing, it still looks like a load pf plastic welded together, but oh boy, when those lights go on, it is a whole different ball game.
So try and picture Stamford Bridge in the same way.
www.google.com/search?client=opera&sxsrf=AJOqlzVDdMHXhbXrHLYgqinR2hq8pLXQTQ:1678205082221&q=neon+lights+on+a+building&tbm=isch&source=univ&fir=jJvpshSFdwkHpM%252ClgZQVrlGxkC4VM%252C_%253B6orkqzzxzL7_bM%252CySdL2Oh_3qO1IM%252C_%253BqA-zOeQwVpaokM%252Cnv4PbGgw1Y4tLM%252C_%253Bn6TIOEsKq4y2GM%252CEK2gXF2yUri--M%252C_%253BVgDA6RW4kVoTCM%252C_lppaPSmvXDf5M%252C_%253B4w8ZglhMPg-dzM%252CZ3KYLGsZH66K6M%252C_%253Bu19gBC-3EB3l8M%252C_j5STqx7FtoX0M%252C_%253Bc67FzoM0Hbcp4M%252CRelsg02AQGcljM%252C_%253BV0fgz-UWJMN3XM%252CLfsI8RwgK70TlM%252C_%253BSLKic1eaNe-JtM%252CZ3KYLGsZH66K6M%252C_%253BnR_gSZFvJm_LVM%252CFzPMdZ2ZyyGM_M%252C_%253BvodSgDZklcdOpM%252CRVMEY8YOPv-4wM%252C_%253BA5hDz9h3RXPcUM%252CRuXiELEc32fLjM%252C_%253BJLTAn0cC8oNQqM%252CkqwxBxfnd7_C8M%252C_&usg=AI4_-kTgiv-B-Su24IsfNLnT8oWiyJnMZw&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjqyqSOmcr9AhVJhlwKHZO4CtkQjJkEegQICBAC&biw=1688&bih=819&dpr=1.1
Look at some of the buildings and you will see what I mean.
Another one talking rubbish.
@@neovarleydownes9109 No amount of colours will save this lopsided monstrosity from looking bland and featureless
It looks like SoFi stadium in Los Angeles if it's near SoFi stadium it will be the best stadium in Europe guarantee
That is the aim :0)
@@natoslayer2907 Sorry, but I would have to strongly disagree with that.
I love the Allianz Arena, but even I have to say, THE best, most electrifying and grandest Stadium I have ever been to, is The Maracana Stadium in Brazil.
I was going on 6 years old and I was there for the Brazil vs. Uruguay match in the World Cup Final on the 16th June, 1950, when it had a capacity of 199,854 and I have never known anything like it since.
6, or 60, the Stadium just takes your breath away and the atmosphere I have not experienced since and I have been to some revelries in my time.
70 odd years on, I can close my eyes and still see it, still smell it and still hear it, so although The Santiago Bernabéu Stadium is a grand Lady and quite the Stadium, but for me, nothing and I mean nothing, beats The Maracana Stadium, not even the Bernabéu, or the Allianz :0)
The Azteca, Mexico and The Rungrado Stadium, North Korea are quite the sight too.
But then I guess we all have our opinions as to what is.
That is one ugly looking stadiun