Investigation: Who’s Telling the Truth about Disco Elysium?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 พ.ค. 2024
- Following the explosive allegations that Disco Elysium has been stolen from its original creators, People Make Games uncovers a far more nuanced story than the one you may have heard so far. Buckle in, this is a big one.
Support us on Patreon: / peoplemakegames
Full interview with ZA/UM CEO Ilmar Kompus: • People Make Games inte...
Full interview with ZA/UM writer, Argo Tuulik: • People Make Games inte...
Created by Chris Bratt:
/ chrisbratt
And Anni Sayers:
/ anni_sayers
0:00:00 - Introduction: The Story So Far
0:08:30 - Chapter 1: Follow The Money
0:31:56 - Chapter 2: Interviewing Ilmar
0:53:27 - Chapter 3: Others Come Forward
1:30:46 - Chapter 4: Robert, Rostov & Helen
2:16:00 - So what do we make of all this? - เกม
![[Full Episode] Hell's Kitchen Thailand EP.14 | 12 พ.ค. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MNspIlqlJcc/mqdefault.jpg)
Two things can be true at once:
1) Robert can be a creative genius that is a bully and a terrible boss to work under.
2) Ilmar (along with other shareholders) stole the company from right under Robert's and Rostov's noses and are using these claims of bullying to make their firing look less suspicious.
*Centrist achievement pops up in the corner*
(I agree of course, I also got that achievement)
Welcome to the Kingdom of Conscience.
Yup, being the world's most laughable centrist never felt better.
@beehive MORALIST WIN OUT ✊✊✊ TOTAL ULTRALIBERAL ELIMINATION
This is a man that should never be in a leadership position.
Sounds like businessmen being duplicitous, artists being neurotic, and workers being shafted once again.
A tale as old as time.
It's like something out of a really lame and boring tv show. Totally unbefitting of anarcho-communist auteurs with advanced conceptions of worker employer relations. One thinks that one of the first actions the core team would have done is to to make the company some kind of cooperative or something, the hierarchical structure of the company basically made it so that tensions and hostilities were inevitable.
Pretty much. This whole situation is like its own Disco Elysium
@@brandonmorel2658 I always thought ZA/UM was a cooperative, specially with the "ZA/UM cultural association" thing I just assumed there was no chance they were a regular ass company
Basically Fortess Accident
@@brandonmorel2658 not to totally absolve the ZA/UM guys, but they needed capital from 1 of the richest people in Estonia and several other business people to even fund the project, if it hadnt been for their money the project wouldnt have even happened. We see once again why systems are more powerful than individuals, its hard to make a more egalitarian work structure when you need money which is held by institutions and individuals who will definitely not cooperate with this, as they are only looking after their own financial self interest. "Capital has the ability to subsume everything under itself" etc
Several things seem very true all at once:
- Robert loved his world very much and wanted control over it, perhaps to the point where he tried to take some things with him that he legally had no right to
- Robert was at times cruel to his writers and deeply incompetent in his leadership role even outside of the crunch period
- Crunch deeply affected Robert, Helen and Roslov and maybe did significant damage
- Helen was pushed off a glass cliff. She was promoted or acknowledged as a lead, then upper management barely communicated with her and said things that weren't in line with reality, so she did not do as good a job as she could have
- Robert, Roslov and Helen weren't very post launch and final cut ended up being made by the people under them
- Ilmar Kompas has made some extremely shady deals and found a way to exploit people recovering from intense burnout into signing away their rights
- Some of the people who made Disco Elysium will now forever be cut off from the thing they made. Even if a sequel is made and they end up with some stake in the IP, they can never work on it again and they have no ownership over anything they actually made. And that is just very sad.
boosting this take. I think you summarize important beats of the story well here
@@beebalmbadil Ilmar sets off so many red flags
this. i get that ppl might complain about equivocation or sneer at the "centrist" take, but pointing out that multiple parties could be at fault here should come as no surprise. We're talking about humans working together for 5 or so years on a single project. Show me a man that hasn't done something dumb, petty or evil in a year's time.
@@TheNSJaws"Show me a man who hasn't done something dumb, petty, or evil in a year's time" is one of THE quotes. Seriously, that's some well-said shit - you should be proud of how much I'm gonna steal it from you.
Oh jeez, that's kinda the whole situation here isn't it? I swear, I didn't mean to - I was just making a joke.
But really, that's a very quotable line you have there.
@@gabby3036 by all means, if I can give you a green light to steal I would. But as it stands, you'll have to use it as your yearly bad deed. I'm sure there's worse ways to cash in your karma.
Saying they are justified in stealing the IP because the dude was a pain to work with is crazy
Who is saying that?
@@orlandonerz2999 Ilmar's letter to Robert at the end of the video
@@orlandonerz2999 dude c'mon
Stolen? Dude was and remains a minor shareholder from foundation of the studio to now.
@@EugenijusKreniswhat does that boot taste like?
It is an incredible testament to the creative process behind Disco Elysium that even after being wronged and feeling hurt, Argo said that he wishes everyone including Robert could have some sort of split of the rights to create within their shared universe of Elysium. Really just reminds me how terribly cruel copyright ownership can be to creative teams like this who are qually as invested in their projects as their leaders are.
Almost as if everyone involved in the work should have an equal say in how the work is produced.
Some sort of worker control of the means of production.
Because I'll be honest, as much as Kurvitz says he's a communist, it feels rather hollow when there are so many other people who worked at ZA/UM who had so much less control over the company and IP than he did.
Other capitalist shareholders took the most, through at least underhanded if not outright illegal means.
He still hoarded control to himself and close friends instead of trusting all his fellow workers.
@@Minihood31770 I probably have a different perspective than many, not being a creative of any type myself, but it seems so often that people forget that intellectual property is private property too, and exists so it can be exploited for profit. I haven't finished the video yet, but I think yours are very similar to the impressions I'll come away with.
@Minihood31770 that's less his fault and more the fault of capitalism
By now you should be aware that copyright was designed to control creators on behalf of business from the beginning.
Out of everyone speaking in this interview, his words were definitely the ones that hit the hardest for me. As a former friend, close to the creation process of DE before it was even a game, his was a position most prone to be resentful and spit venom, and he _still_ defended Robert's claim to the IP, even as he criticised him. It genuinely broke my heart to see.
Only 48 mins on but deeply obsessed with Ilmar being asked if he understands the weird ethics of the shareholder situation and just saying "well you can't hold things from his past against him, also all the shareholders agreed on it. No I can't prove that"
story tellers?? LMAO💀💀
I mean, Helen Hindepere isn't any better on subject. When confronted with the same statement by 3 people including 2 of the writers that she didn't do any substantial work on Final Cut, all she has to say is that she is happy she worked with those people and she is open to communication. Basically dodging the whole accusation.
Same. Feels like it should be a simple, "Yes, it's weird."
"well you can't hold things from his past against him"
Yes. Yes I can. He's a smug and self-admitted debt dodger. Belongs in prison and his dispersed and hidden assets confiscated ruthlessly and used to pay his debts. And he should be thankful if that's the worst that happens to him. Anyone that dodgy probably owes money to folks who would think nothing of turning him into literal dog food as an object lesson. How he's still walking around without a cane is beyond me.
Lol yeah it's super weird and sketchy but my fuck does the main dude sound awful as well, especially for someone that's supposed to be for "worker rights". It seems like he's really obsessed with ownership, which goes against a ton of what he apparently believes. Which is even weirder that he tried to steal the IP he willingly sold to the company for compensation.
I just want to give Argo a hug and let him know how much his work means to everyone.
Same. He seemed genuinely pained by having to reveal such a vulnerable part of his work and his own personal life....
Argo seems like he is all heart. Listening him talk was almost painful because you can see how difficult his emotions on this topic is.
He is just a pretentious commie
I love Argo. I slowed the video back down to normal speed because he was so lovable and gripping to listen to. We must protect himb
Argo's the real hero in all of this. You can tell he really appreciates everyone who pitched in for that "one magical moment" from all angles, including those who provided the money to the ousted visionaries. He's still hoping for everyone to somehow have a part in all of this, while also realizing that everyone deserve this more than one guy deserves it.
"Dora Klindžić broadly echoed Tuulik’s sentiment: “I've seen good work done at ZA/UM. I've also seen management and production staff terrorizing creatives, lying, playing power games, turning people against each other, destroying relationships and people's self-esteem. For this, there have been no repercussions.”
She also emphasized that some workers would not only lose their jobs, but would have to upend their whole lives as a result of the layoffs: “As a reward for our hard work, some of us are even slated to lose our immigration status in the UK and will have to evacuate the country. We will be gone by next week, but those who remain are grappling with a place irrevocably changed.
“The mask has slipped from the face of capital. What remains at ZA/UM is a cold, careless company where managers wage war against their own creatives, where artistry is second to property, and where corporate strategy is formed by an arrogant disdain for their own audience.”"
Dora Klindžić and Argo Tuulik are truly magnificent artists.
I can't draw conclusions only from interviews but I felt Argo's pains during his intervention. He seems genuinely hurt by the whole situation. It also seems to this day he is still processing what happened.
I don't remember if it was in this or in the full interview, but he mentioned how he is a lot less affected then many of his peers who received death threats and such, because he doesn't have any internet presence.
Yeah, I believe the inclusion of Argo's interview is probably one of the most important sources of information in this whole interview circus. Argo's honesty is incredibly clarifying and illuminating and you can tell he still struggles emotionally with the fallout to this day.
Where Argo was honest about the unhealthy dynamic from the strict and unyielding leader-follower relationship he had developed with Robert to the point that his wife was concerned really added important context to the story. This allowed my understanding of the relationship between Robert and Rostov to make sense. At some point Robert was questioning Rostov's ability to be the art lead and tried to get him removed from his post (and actually succeeded), but then strangely enough, he later riled Rostov back up AGAIN in order to get him to help them both take back their original leadership roles. Rostov seems to have just gone with it and I wouldn't be surprised if Rostov and Robert currently still have that dynamic.
It's no surprise to me that Robert probably has a very charming personality, which gets people to follow him naturally. This sort of thing usually also allows him to be cruel to others and have that cruelty be tolerated without imploding the group. As a leader, Robert has a lot of work to do in order to do a better job of building a company because dismissing the hard work of others without providing any sort of guidance other than "I don't like it. It's trash. Go do it again." is totally useless. Robert contributed a lot of ideas to this project but was an active hindrance against the development of ideas from his team. Not only that, but he manipulated the newer members of the team by dangling admission to the "in-group" (this sort of behavior is incredibly toxic) like a carrot when it was obvious that he had no intention of honoring it. This is something for which he needs to take responsibility.
No man is an island. Everyone needs help at some point. Nobody undertakes a project of this magnitude alone. It surprises me that Robert has such little gratitude for the team who helped him bring his ideas to life. (Note: I am not counting Kaur, Ilmar, Margus, and Anu in any of this. The issue with those individuals are massive but constitute another topic entirely.)
@@pnpgutterfold Agreed. Robert very much gives me the vibe of someone with a "reality distortion field", as they called it back in the day. That doesn't mean he's *wrong* on the material facts of the legal battle, but he definitely doesn't have the moral high ground he thinks he does. For all that he talks about "asking himself" whether or not he's good to work with, I don't think he's ever seriously confronted what a good teammate looks like, let alone made progress on achieving it.
You can hear the glint in his eyes while talking about it in his voice. It hirts so much that he's a victim of this entire situation.
@@pnpgutterfoldthe whole removing Rostov and then riling him up and invigorating him to gain his position back is something I'd feel only the Claire's could pull off, with how ridiculous and unfair it is.
Something that really stood out to me is the way in which it *appears* Tõnis is avoiding having to repay a settlement for defrauding people, by having his partner be a shareholder instead of him, to hide his money from the Estonian government.
When interviewing Ilmar, Ilmar's response to this was to say that:
1) This arrangement was in place before he took control of the company
2) "Everyone had agreed to it", ie, this isn't something that he did behind the backs of the shareholders that are suing him.
3) After he gained control of the company, the payments through Studio 38 stopped (but, presumably the proxy shareholder situation remains the same)
...but what the heck kind of defense is that?!? It kinda sounds like what he's saying here is: "Yes, we ARE helping our friend Tõnis avoid repaying the money he legally owes for defrauding people, through a sketchy and potentially illegal scheme... but don't worry! Everyone here agreed to do that, not just me!"
Am I crazy, or is this a **huge** thing to just gloss over? It kinda feels like the people running this company were complicit in helping Tõnis hide his income/shares from the Estonian courts. Which, if true, speaks to lax morals and an extremely sketchy way of doing business on the part of everyone involved in running this company.
*EDIT:* I don't mean to criticize PMG by saying that this was "glossed over". I suspect PMG had very good reasons for not saying something that could be construed as an accusation of illegal activity. The UK has very strict libel laws, after all.
Which is why I wanted to make a comment pointing it out!
Agreed. It made me realize everyone here is were complicit and only brought it up after they were screwed.
It very much is, and a good reporter would have pressed him on that.
But they feel as though it's justified because the "scandal" happened because of the financial crash rather than criminal intent, and that outsiders wouldn't understand the nuance because the primary Estonian news source on it is owned by one of the aggrieved
parties. Not saying that justification checks out cuz i dont know emough either way and dont care, just that I understand why they don't think of themselves as criminals.
@@SixArmedSweater It's also just not that important to the questions about disco elysium's IP
I think perhaps the reason why People Make Games in particular glossed over it is because it wasn’t relevant to the situation actually being discussed, and pressing Ilmar on it further runs the risk of the interview being less productive due to fear or whatever that Ilmar would feel as a result. A generally important story, but only as relevant as People Make Games made it to the Disco Elysium story in particular.
If you hired someone to manage your finances, then they used your money to buy your house, I don't think any judge would think it matters at all if you were a bad coworker or an unreliable friend. It's not hard to tell who's in the wrong here.
That was the point 😉
But what if they are REALLY bad though, your coworkers or friends?
@@gooddaytoyou5256 people don't like those kinds of stories.
@@gooddaytoyou5256 Then give the house to the co-workers or friends, not the finance manager
LOL what a bad analogy
I’m no expert but I’m not sure that being bad managers is as big of an issue as Illmar buying ip for 1 euro, selling it back for 4.5 million euros, and then buying majority share of the company without written agreement or documentation of the other shareholders
Yeah, the false equivalency here is staggering. Video tries so hard to be fair to both sides that it just ends up muddying the waters. From what it looks and is alleged, the CEO defrauded the company and used company funds to buy shares for himself to then oust the remaining "minority" shareholders. His only defense is "yeah there's no paper trace on the shareholders signing up on this bc we're such a small and inexperienced bunch" and "my contribution was much larger than 1 quid, but I'll not tell you any details about that" -- and the interviewer left it at that?
Bringing in the other team members to talk about hardships during development and perceived personality flaws isn't nuance, it's pretty much irrelevant.
Well, Ilmar couldn't say anything else for legal reasons, and it's exactly what Kurvitz did as well when he said that he does not want the interview to be fully released.
Also, I beg to differ, the problems encountered during the development were pretty important. For a community that keeps bashing on ZA/UM and their employees for stealing Kurvitz's work, it's important to show that in fact, DE is not entirely Kurvitz's work and that people working at ZA/UM were also part of the creation of the game. I don't think the video was made in order to resolve legal disputes, but rather to show DE's community a bigger picture of the situation
@@urbantwilightvery well put. There is a blatant false equivalency on this video. If anything, it will only foster more drama...
And now Komar is on trial lmao
That second interview was heartbreaking to watch. You can just see the stress and struggle the guy is ging through while retelling everything. I don't know if this is because the events themselves were stressing, or talking bad about people he (used to) look up to stresses him.
He sounded the most truthful out of everyone that was interviewed in the video.
Also the fact that he doesn't even seem to realize that this was toxic behavior is incredibly sad to me.
You see him describing in detail moments of public humiliation and bullying that very obviously deeply affected him and when pushed on if it was toxic behavior he's only like "Oh I guess you could say that this probably was toxic"
Like this to me points to the fact that this wasn't an isolated incident, this happened so many times that he internalized it as normal.
@@SimokVI It sounds like a good thing he has his wife. "She said I was sliding into follower mentality again," later ,"The abuse made us better at following his vision".
@SimokVI thanks for this perspective. This is what I felt, but I did not realize.
@@SimokVI the full interview with him provides additional context.
In short, by Argo's admission, he felt Alexander Rostov was the one fucked over the most. Rostov was another someone caught in Robert's orbit without the cognizance to escape - a reflection of Argo's younger self. Furthermore, Argo asserts that the needs of the company (and its 100 some-odd employees) are greater than those of Robert.
I don't think Argo Tuulik normalized anything. I feel he recognizes his circumstances as extraordinary and is, at present, grateful for them.
I fully believe that Robert Kurvitz was a nightmare to work for, especially during a crunch period. I can also fully believe that when the game turned into a big success he checked out and did very little work for a while. But the timeline according to Ilmar Kompas makes no sense. If he did no work for two years, then how was he making the work environment so toxic? You literally can't yell at people if you're not around. They were clearly happy to tolerate his behaviour when it was making them money. It only became a problem when they started to get into a conflict about the buy-out. And their explanation of the buy-out shenanigans amounts to 'trust me bro'. My hunch is that Kompas absolutely did steal the company, but had been saving up ammunition in advance to use against Kurvitz in order to give him a pretext to fire him if necessary, and muddy the waters afterward. None of that justifies Kurvitz' behaviour towards his colleagues, but that behaviour still falls a long way short of criminal... unlike fraud.
The use of the word 'toxic' is unhelpful, as it's a very vague term that people inevitably view through the filter of their own experiences. It can mean anything from being a bit passive-aggressive or domineering through to full-fledged criminal abuse, and the overall effect is that when they hear it a lot of people tend to either assume the absolute worst or dismiss the allegations entirely, depending on their personal politics, rather than take a more balanced look at the claims.
Also consider that many of these people were friends with Robert for decades prior, I could imagine that the stress of A) working on a personally meaningful game for five years and B) feeling like your co-shareholder is messing you around, could absolutely make someone burnt out, and when people are burnt out, that's also when they start snapping and being a prick to other people.
I agree with this 100%. I think the video does a poor job about focusing on literal criminality vs Robert's potentially crappy but obviously non-criminal behavior. If the Kompus takeover did not happen, and Robert ultimately was fired for being so disagreeable and unable to be worked with, then there would be no drama. Ultimately, if Kompus' shady actions are targeted and dealt with, then these workers and artists can solve or handle their personal disputes however they see fit, and it won't really be any of my business.
@@solidpython4964 I disagree about the video's focus. I think they did a really good job thoroughly exploring all of the allegations that have been made, and you have to consider that some of those allegations are around why Robert was fired. Since we can't know exactly what Kompus was thinking and what his reasoning was, only what people say, it's a very responsible thing to take a look at if any of anyone's claims could be true, and that includes examining the possibility validity of "Robert was fired because of misconduct." Also, PMG isn't a team of lawyers, they would be unqualified to weigh in on if the exchanges were criminal or not, especially in an ongoing court case.
@@sydneygorelick7484 I mean I'm not asking for that, but the original given reason of IP theft doesn't seem to get as much focus as the later revised reason of toxicity. It seems rather obvious that Robert was very easy to pin as difficult to work with, and he definitely seems like that kind of obtrusive tortured artist who disrupts normal collaborative work. But there seems to be a clear possibility that this is the excuse after some shady suspect stuff went down. And to be fair, it goes both ways, where Robert and Aleksander seem to be focusing on their dismissal as a web of conspiracy and not because of legitimate work reasons. But it felt like 2/3 of the run-time was focused on he-said-she-said work dispute drama and not really on the material issues presented by the corporate takeover. Feels like wires are crossed here, and it is not clear at all why or if these 2 threads are even related.
@@sydneygorelick7484 doesn't matter what he was fired for. This is a criminal act and theft of IP vs some guy maybe being a bad boss and trying to sway the public opinion of him so people will buy the next ZAUM game.
Ilmar's defense is "Oh they're story tellers. They do that well" are you kidding me dude? -.-
Its amazing how clear as day financial crime has taken place and no police investigation is being done.
They're too busy raiding people for posting pepe the frog on twitter.
This is definitely a story thats happening on 2 very different levels.
One is the theft of an entire company by corrupt financiers, and the other is cultural issues within the company.
The theft seems to be entirely unrelated to the internal culture of the studio. Definitely give Robert some credit for his statement that the culture and personal issues that plauged the company are now being used to justify the theft.
Of course, the biggest victims of all this is the employees and honestly if Robert does manage to get back the company him and his core team need to really think about how they're gonna restructure how leadership and creative credit is handled.
The way I see it they're not so disconnected. The disempowering of Robert's lead team seemed to happen not long after the takeover.
It's entirely possible they saw the creators as unmanageable, and pulled some underhanded and possibly illegal moves to manage it. As a matter of fact, I bet that's what happened. The investor gets a personal interest in his investment, realizes the genius creator is... best as a solo writer to put it mildly, and starts looking for ways to get rid of the guy. If he's already being shady with the studio 38 stuff, he'll be more than happy to use shady tactics to remove what he sees as the nut job ruining his business
@@mikek6298 It's morally different, though, in the sense that neither justifies the other. Robert was an asshole because of his own personal issues and the company was stolen because the investor is a capitalist ghoul.
I think if Robert and Helen were better leaders they would have been able to get the others to follow them to another company. And the team being ready to follow them would cause Ilmar to have to make a deal where those two could remain leads if he wanted to make more DLC or a sequel that fans would accept. But it appears the rest of the team weren't willing to continue working under Robert and Helen. And Robert wasn't willing to stick around with less control.
Speaking of Ilmar, I would have really liked to see him be made to lay out exactly what the "transaction" that he refuses to call a loan was if it was not a loan. If it was a payment for the delivery of something of value to all of the shareholders he should say exactly what that value was if he wants us to believe that it wasn't loan or even outright theft of ZA/UM money. I'd have also liked to hear precisely what Studio 38 did to earn the money it received. Because if Studio 38 didn't provide value equal to money paid, it looks like money being paid under the table to Tonis.
I've been seeing this discussion on some other platforms and yeah, some people are really making the argument that any toxicity in the culture justifies the theft, as if a wrong could somehow be righted by an even BIGGER wrong.
The documentarist is not offended by possible financial fraud or creative theft. He is far, far, far more offended that the subject of the documentary was angry and bitter about having this life's work stolen from him, didn't appreciate that the documentary was a set of jangling keys, and refused to participate in his game. The documentarist then finished his investigation with a personal complaint of how rude Kurvitz was to him, and portrayed this as the ultimate Gotcha! of the investigation.
Mind melting imagining the logistics of putting this all together. Incredible work.
i like the music you play in your videos. good picks.
I think an interesting thing to consider here is how much of Robert and co's mismanagement seemed to stem pretty directly from higher management (in particularly Kaur). Not defending or justifying their actions in any way at all, but it really stuck out to me that Justin complained that Helen wasn't communicating deadlines to the writers, but Helen later says that she herself wasn't kept in the loop about when deadlines were (at around 1:40:00 she mentions being told of the writing lock with only 2 weeks notice by Kaur), and it seems like what she understood her role as lead writer was was considerably different than what others took it to be. There's also Robert talking about how the deadlines were all coming through from upper management, which were responsible for the crunch - which seems really believable to me.
I think something which I haven't seen talked about a lot is how the 2 years where Robert and Rostov "checked out" seems to coincide pretty closely with when the shareholder situation started to sour. Again, I'm not excusing it because I can see it being extremely frustrating for people like Justin and Kaspar to have to pick up the slack when their supposed bosses weren't doing much of anything, but it seems to me like Robert in particular would have been wrapped up in all the legal/corporate stuff around that time which would've made it far more difficult to work in a writers capacity. This on top of the general managerial/VO stuff which seemed to be what Helen was dealing with for the most part over that time. It's speculative, but it just adds another level to me of how this whole issue really is just such a mess of conflicting reports.
Ultimately though, I'm still pretty firmly on the side of Ilmar (and to a lesser extent Kaur) being scumbags. When Robert describes how Kaur and Ilmar talked him into signing over the IP rights to ZA/UM permanently, its hard to not read that as two professional businessman taking advantage of the fact that the owner of a valuable IP wasn't particularly business savvy. Robert obviously should have gotten legal representation before making such a massive decision, but the fact that the repercussions weren't communicated to him by people claiming to be looking out for his best interest is pretty scummy to me (even if it isn't technically illegal)
@@pnpgutterfold Yeah I agree 100%. The more I’ve looked into this since I wrote this comment originally, the more I reckon Kaur got off very, very lightly here and it’s kind of soured me a little on the video a whole - there’s a brief mention of him having a “chaotic role” in the story early on, but after that there’s little direct examination of his actions, motivations, or responsibility in what a clusterfuck the whole situation became. I feel that’s in part because he didn’t want to be a part of the video so maybe PMG didn’t feel comfortable focusing too heavily on him without getting his side of the story (as that does seem to be a driving motivation behind this video more broadly), but I don’t really think you can do that when he’s so clearly driving a huge amount of the conflict here.
There is a special breed of businessman in Eastern Europe which have something i call 'chronic scheming'. They learned they way of doing business in late soviet union or in 90-es, when system where non-functional, incredibly unwieldy and corrupt, so doing business was inevitably tied to using combinations shady schemes to work through loopholes. Some of them basically unable to think about business model without scheming it around the corners of the legality even if it's is not actually more convenient or profitable.
Also, Robert does not seem to completely comprehend that creation of the game is a team effort and being a lead is also about people and processes not only about his creative vision. Likely as someone who does not seem to respect his own well-being in pursuit of creative goals he don't respect others well-being in pursuit of *his* creative goals.
This is exactly why real journalists have ethical standards that would prevent them from pursuing a story that was clearly being interfered with by one side like this. Ilmar pressured his employees into speaking up in spite of them preferring to speak off the record. PMG chased the story past the proper trail of evidence and got led down a rabbit trail
you have a very good point which many tend to ignore. the original team took responsibility for the whole project and the whole set of poor mortgage-burdened employees all the way until they no longer could
there is a difference between nuance and grasping for straws where it is easy, because you can't pose the hard questions. ilmar got away without being confronted with a clear timeline, yet robert was tossed into a gallery of broken relationships that he obviously feels strongly about
maybe next time People Make Games should cover corporate mergers, and not the video game industry. or just go work for the sun
@@rrrrthats4rsWhat evidence do you have for that claim?
Okay, I work in financial analysis for an international company and, in situations with missing context and messy books, the cleanest narrative you tend to be able to paint is “Was this transaction, listed here, registered there?” In the case of Kaur’s accusation of Ilmar, regardless of how the case shook out, we can ask: did Ilmar pay back the amount Kaur accused him of (essentially) embezzling? If the answer is yes, that payment is tantamount to an admission of Kaur’s accusation. As Kaur suggested; if Ilmar paid back money earned legitimately from the company, but only did so after borrowing money from the same company in order to gain the position to accrue that wealth, that’s fraud. Straight up. It really is the Gordian Knot of cases, when you look at the numbers. Regardless of controversy, were the funds used to acquire a majority legitimate? If not, Ilmar’s committed a crime. And, you know, given his history…
Very elucidating, the crux of the matter is whether a financial crime/fraud was committed or not, the rest is smokes and mirrors to distract from that.
@@esilva032 Pretty much. Listen, we can legislate whether or not Kurvitz is a misogynist, and whether the leadership at the top of the team are responsible for a toxic work environment - hardly going to take long for *that* debate - but we can do so *after* we determine if a crime’s been committed, and whether the people we think are a bit shitty own the property they helped create.
Exactly my conclusion. But I have a doubt which I hope someone can clarify.
1. The decison to agree to selling the company IP for 1 dollar and then the same company buying it back for 4.8 Million is green lit by which individual/group of individuals?
Who has the final say in selling the IP? Exploring that connection will add more light to the fraud done by Kompas (imo, I think he clearly comitted fraud).
Having worked in multiple startups and corporate settings for several years now, this video felt like staring into a collage of my past experiences. There are people like these everywhere in the world. But Kurvitz, in particular, stands out.
Not because I've worked with someone like him, but because I've been friends with someone like him. Argo saying the follower leader thing was something I deeply related with, and while I am not married yet, I and my peers were lucky enough to snap out of it.
I genuinely feel for Robert, this is his life's work, but the tortured artist often fails to see how their own actions inevitably end up being used against them.
I have been in a relationship with this leader/follower dynamic and it's extremely hurtful. I genuinely hope Robert will some day reflect on his behaviour there and choose to do better.
@@AfutureV Unfortunately. As a design student I see how my friends undersell their hard earned skills bc they're passionate. I hate to act as cut-throat as the business type at negotiating, yet the world won't let us share art and techniques without backstabbing us.
Very much so. One thing I noticed that raised significant red flags was how overbearing he appeared to be in his interview in regards to Rostov, including cutting him off a couple of times and completing his thought process for him. That certainly tracks with a lot of the problems and complaints the other former employees mentioned. It's also very obvious he is on a warpath, and very much not seeing the forest for the trees in terms of his relationship with others. So this would, at the very least, make the allegations from Argos and Kasper very credible. And it is equally telling that none of the people who have been with ZA/UM from the very start deny that this game and its world are his baby and duly credit him for it.
And if the situation regarding the making of the Final Cut does seem to include a fair deal of bad organisation from all involved, it also seems to have more than its share of divide and conquer tactics from the upper management. It's obvious that crunch was happening left and right, and if I certainly understand Rostov, Kurvitz and Hindpere taking personal time, it's obvious that this fostered resentment, which makes me question both why didn't the other overworked employees rightfully demand the same time off and why didn't Kurvitz, Rostov and Hindpere demand the same out of solidarity. In the end, and as it stood, they were all crunching for the financial gain of the money people, and that should be an issue where they all stood together on the same side. But on this, there were clearly divide and conuer tactics at play, it seems. And on that note, it does strike me as odd that some of the other interviewed employees seem so content to go to bat for corporate even after so many clear examples of their very shady behaviour.
@@thegrimner "why didn't Kurvitz, Rostov and Hindpere demand the same out of solidarity"
Because they (or at least Robert, as a dominating personality the others just follows/are manipulated to follow) do not have any solidarity to the workers. Why didn't Kaspar or Argo, or Helen, or any of the other workers own anything of the company or the IP? Because Kurvitz don't care about workers. He cares only about himself and his own creative vision - no matter how much of it is created by anyone else. In his mind, he is the sole creator, it is his child, he sacrificed for it. He even sacrificed friendships for it.
But he can't see past his fucking greed and ego.
@@Taeerom Incredible nuance there, buddy. I mean, beyond the fact that not a single one of his coworkers disputes the fact that the world and the story are Kurvitz's brainchild, it could just as easily be argued that someone like Justin Keenan kind of has a vested interest in getting promoted at Kurvitz's expense, which is why he and Petteri came up with that frankly ridiculous story about Robert trying to sneak the IP away from the studio.
Notice that I said "it could" though, because I am much, much less inclined to jump into conclusions. WHich is why, if I had to guess, this has all the signs of management turning workers against each other using and exploiting pre existing issues to widen the rifts between them. Again, no one disputes Kurvitz and Rostov and Hindpere worked like hell on the game, or their mention of intense crunch; what's incredibly contradictory, even within the other workers of ZA/UM, is the level of involvement expected of him for the Final Cut; but as for rest after years of crunch? Yeah, I'd very much say it's earned; for every one. That people resent him for both taking time off and simultaneously wanting to be involved, and nowhere there are questions being asked regarding what are clearly unrealistic timeframes from management should give time for pause; as should the fact that some of the workers interviewed do seem to go above and beyond to defend managers that were involved in what's at best pretty unethical, and legally shady corporate takeover. Not that I don't understand why people who uprooted themselves have a vested interest in keeping their jobs, but by the same token, their vested interests should be taken into consideration.
Robert seems like an unpleasant boss, likely exacerbated by the stress of making the game, but it does seem like he was shafted here with his behaviour used as a later excuse to cover up the fact his ideas and the company were stolen from him.
Yeah it really doesn't sit right with me, it feels like the people who have legitimate issues with him ended up being used in this battle of him against the money people
@@Tardsmat which is basically what he says on his letter at the end, he should acknowledge his toxic behavior but it has nothing to do with what happened to the company
Yeah I doubt anything would have been done about his behavior, if it wasn't convenient for taking control of the company from him
Bad people make good things. Worse people steal those good things. Seems pretty cut and dry to me.
@@amergingiles And good, honest ppl get screwed over by both hoards of idiots. Crucial party missing here.
The developers and artists on team are big part of the reason DE is a miracle as it exists.
I think that, to me the tragedy of all this is the loss of those moments that are talked about in the second view with wide eyes. Those tabletop campaigns that Elysium came from must have been much simpler times, when ZA/UM were friends instead of business associates. Its sad to me that the price of their incredible art might be the loss of the connections between them.
I think this, all of this makes for a great extension to the art of Elysium. It's a dehumanising thing to say, but this story would fit perfectly in Elysium - capitalism subsumes all. Even in how friends decay and end up in sad dispositions between eachother over time.
I was having the exact same thoughts. I enjoyed Disco a ton but generally stay away from gaming discussion boards (reddit…😂) so had no idea about all of this.
The background on where ZAUM came from really does make the enormous success/profit of Disco seem like both a blessing and a curse.
I wonder if it was lightning in a bottle. Can a sequel succeed without the charismatic yet totally destructive leader + core members of the founding group?
You acquired majority share of the company? With no paper trail? During the pandemic? While In cahoots with an established embezzler?
That's fine. Makes sense.
That Kurvitz guy is a bully you say? Outrageous!
Yeah, I feel embarrassed for eating up PMG's reporting. I would have continued to be ignorant had I not stumbled upon Jamrock Hobo's updates. They really provided perspective. I'd like PMG to issue an update apology amendment/addendum (or a separate follow-up video) that addresses their shortcomings in the reporting of this piece.
@@pnpgutterfold This video is mostly the interviews of the real people. Both things can be equally true from this video; Kurvitz was a bastard artist, and the publisher did financial slight of hand to get everything they could. There's no shortcomings, just what the people themselves said.
@@Hypogean7 Yes, that's correct. Both of those things are equally true, but one was used to cover up and justify the other, and that was not appropriate.
Amazing how ilmar always has enough personal money in the amounts of millions to makes all those purchases, but the only amount to have officially been recorded is 300,000. Which which which... well, it's a more logical amount for a man on his position, at that time, to have in savings.
Also he dismisses questions about ethics regarding the decisions by saying "well, Robert was aware too" or "it was all in the benefit of the group". Doesn't make it less illegal mate, just goes to show how quickly you're willing to throw someone else under the bus.
Also very convenient that "we were a small company" and "the meetings weren't recorded" is used in a transaction of millions of euros when I've worked in (smaller) companies where transactions of $5000 were heavily documented.
I mean, devil's advocate argument, a businessman addressing a loose group of punk, communists. They probably don't care, or care enough to understand so why record it for posterity? I don't necessarily agree with that take but could be a logical conclusion.
@@ClockworkGFX it's also a well known business person conducting several loans, and sales and re-sales in units of millions. You'd think he'd have documentation about it.
@@ryanrobot7975 could be a great out for some sketchy stuff. I think the door swings both ways.
@@ClockworkGFXno way. If he is a businessman then he is aware of the importance of documentation and consciously forewent it.
I see lots of people (rightly!) praising Chris's reporting, but I have to point out that Anni did an INCREDIBLE job with all of the graphics and animation on this one. Amazing work, both of you!
I'd like to buy PMG from them but I don't have the money, so how about I buy their next video for 1€ and then sell it back for 4.000.000€, then I use the 4.000.000€ to buy the company, then I reimburse the for the difference with the profits from future videos? Keemaaaaaaaaan it's a good deal!
+
Agreed it’s like sound design in a video game. If no one comments on it it’s because it’s probably great and doesn’t detract from the more obvious elements, be it killer reporting or amazing graphics.
I do hope there's an update that's planned. Would like to hear more on what happened with recent developments.
Why?
The last few minutes of this video says alot more than I think he realizes. In the majority of the video, there's a tone of being an even handed journalist just trying to get the facts without putting his finger on the scale (which, by the way, is impossible) until the end where he suddenly becomes indignant ar Kurvitz's admittedly non-response to the follow up questions. Where was this actual "nah" after all the things Ilmar said and refused to substantiate, or the many questions he side stepped? They sometimes get a brief acknowledgement, but never a minutes long outraged monologue. Which is especially odd when, as others have pointed out, fraud and the hijacking of the life's work of many people and being a bit of a dick who's not suited to leadership, aren't equal crimes. Bias is unavoidable in journalism so I try to give leeway in that respect but man. That was a hell of a tone shift and a hell of a time for it.
personally (and I'm obviously just speculating) it's possible that it hit a more personal note for the interviewer because a bad/toxic boss is more relatable and more "tangible" than fraud and IP theft. If I'm being honest, reading that email response also enraged me, because it's a such a cop-out and a complete disregard of his employees' very serious grievances. it's just something that people are more likely to be able to empathize with.
@@maplebaconcakes5113 that would be fair if there wasn't an active lawsuit going on. I don't know the man and can't say how he feels, but given that it's *the* reason the corpos said he was fired, it would have been incredibly stupid to respond, especially after PMG showed their hand like that - watch Kompus' interview again, he did the same thing but more smoothly and businesslike and they either didn't notice or let it slide. Again I don't know him or how he feels but if I were in his position, I could be crying myself to sleep every night over it and still would have given a similar response.
bc everyone knows the financial side is sketchy and will likely be settled in court. The community of the game is not really seeing through the toxicity of Robert's response tho, which more or less confirms what has been said about him by centering the entire scandal as well as the output of the company around himself and the people in his close circle he is also manipulating.
I.e. If he is involved in any capacity with a new title, he must be a writer only since he is a loose cannon that you can't really have in contact with the rest of the team. Which obviously isn't going to work, especially since he feels entitled to control his work exclusively and run the company his way.
It is a publicly traded company, necessarily so under capitalism to fund development, so there will be capitalists involved, and the correspondence from Tonis confirms that the goal of these investors is growth (duh). Ultimately, that requires a smooth operation that is not possible with a toxic clique at the helm. This isn't inherently bad, but it's clear that Robert will need to self evaluate before he could be involved with DE2 again, and he has instead chosen to hide behind ideology and entirely ignore the primary victims of the debacle, being the employees that suffered under the management of both him and ZA/UM, further indicating that his ideology is dogmatic rather than practical considerations for the material conditions of the working class.
Even though this is obviously a very heavy and unpleasant topic, I have to say I'm so glad to be seeing more of the faces behind this game! The team always seemed to be very non-public facing, so there wasn't honestly a lot of detailed info around on who these people were and where they came from. Hearing things about their history and who was doing what in the game's development from people like Argo is great, because the only voices that have ever really been present so far have been Robert, Helen (and Aleksander). Evrart Claire is amazing! Cuno is amazing! Now, obviously the work was being done under the creative vision of Kurvitz, Rostov and Hindpere, so they should get a lot of credit for that, but everyone else was also clearly putting in a hefty amount of creative energy as well!
my heart goes out to the ZA/UM employees. they spoke with such passion and love for this game.
corporate meddling will always fuck over the employees the worst.
Lol, it's wild that in the 'documentary' they played softball with the corporate leaders of ZA/UM while they threw the creatives under the bus.
Looks like corporate wrong doings impact lives more than robert and co taking a long break from work after crunch. Who would've guessed.
They're all telling the truth. You can be a bully and be bullied yourself. Predators get eaten by bigger predators. I wish people would understand that being a victim doesn't make you a perfect and harmless person.
very true, everyone wants to pick a side, but its just not that simple
Sorry, but that's BS. We don't know how bad his actions and behaviour were. Toxic is a very flexible expression, what is toxic to one person might just be being a little harsh for another. And fe. being very critical and dismissive of someone's work doesn't necessarily mean you are a horrible monster of a boss, even less, when the criticism might just be correct.
it's not like there's a law saying you can't harshly criticize someone at work, because it might hurt their feelings. I'm not saying there's nothing to these allegations, but in which world does this justify what happened to him and the other two?
This was their project, their company, their creative IP, even if he was a horrible boss, then just making him take a backseat when it comes to running the company or dealing with other employees would have been enough. What happened here is that Kompass used shady, almost certainly illegal means to acquire a majority of the company, when the three others wanted to see paper work to understand what had happened, he fired them and then consequently began a slander campaign against them, especially Kurvitz.
@@dieyng maybe not in Estonia but in the US there absolutely are laws against a hostile work environment.
ok lets say it how it is: copyright never served the artist as long as he wasnt richer then his opponent. It is a shame and a scandal that one of the best universe created this century is being stolen from the original creators and we all can see the proof clearly weighing in for them. Nothing would have ever been created without those 3 the way it was. And the sequel will never come close to the original if the original minds that created this universe over years dont work on it and own it. Yall coping not fighting for the artist or freedom in general for that matter
@@un1c0rn52 picking a side is necessary if you are not strong enough to stay neutral
You will simply go insane if you don't pick a side in this situation
I'm really grateful for Argo's view of this as someone who thinks kindly of everyone on the team but also sees their flaws, especially Robert's. I agree with him, that what happened to Robert was unfair for a story that he was so instrumental in, but it's important realising that the accusations against him aren't 100% false either. I do think it's important to remember that while some stories can be important individual artistic visions, video games are a collaborative medium, and you need to make that collaboration easier, not harder.
EDIT: I wanna make it clear Robert still has the right to fight what was clearly a hostile takeover by Ilmar/whoever else made the decision to remove him, Hellen and Rostov - definitely his toxicity needs to be addressed as well but it's clear it's being used as an excuse on the money side since the original reason for his firing wasn't even the toxicity, but the alleged IP theft.
Yeah it sounds a lot like Robert is clearly a terrible person to work with but at the same time he might very well be right. It feels like any ways this goes, the chances of a new game being made in a better environment are unfortunately slim due to his denial of addressing his own extremely toxic behaviour.
Everyone needs a friend like Argo.
I have seen enough news coming out of video game studios to know that you can commit legitimate crimes as long as you are still profitable. Robert became a profit risk.
toxicity will be a background element of humanity for centuries to come, and it will show its head whenever stress accompanies it . i'm scared of people who think otherwise
@@Lovyxia It's often effortless to label someone as toxic simply because they work differently. Unfortunately, this has become a common trend in our society. Consider the works of Hayao Miyazaki as an example. Great art doesn't always come from incorporating every suggestion. It's important to have faith in the creative process. If someone doesn't believe in it, they always have the choice to step away, as their stakes may not be as significant as they perceive them to be.
This is exactly the kind of content that needs to be supported and its creation financially sustainable. Thank you!
Hear Hear! I literally paused it at 1:30 and join their patreon because they always do solid work.
Was a similar realisation after the Roblox video for me, well worth the few quid a month!
I'm going to go and disagree. I thank them for the interviews and the access but...
But the whole thing is a mess and kind of bias. A timeline of events was needed, my blood boil, everytime I saw the Justin Keenan guy, calling the writing leads lazy, and criticizing them to go on vacation, but the context it lacks is that this happens after the fucking release of the game, after a fucking crunch. Have you guys never been on a long project? And now of course he gets Robert's job. His interview added nothing but "Robert bad" without the real context.
And then we have the final thoughts of the video: "I don't know, Robert hurt the feelings of some workers and didnt care much for them, so It's fine if he loses his IP, I guess"
NOICE
I agree and believe poor, unworthy content become banned and rejected. Produce morally and consume morally.
Video game journalism is about the least important journalism I can think of. It's probably equal in importance to sports journalism.
This investigation should be updated. It seemed to miss the mark in the first place giving way too much equal time to the executives that took the studio, but after current events it makes it's ideas on the whole situation out of date.
what's the update on the situation?
I know I can google, but is it true that the current studio holders are coasting off exploitation, essentially?
and if I wanna play Disco Elysium now, I shouldn't officially purchase it just yet?
ehh, just play it. Ive no idea what effect it really has to not purchase it. Experiencing a great art like disco, you'de probably get more value by playing versus protesting it, or finding a safe way to irate it. I wouldn't be too paranoid.@@VinTJ
@@Hazparinrip, it's more that I don't want the money to fall into hands that don't deserve it, especially if the original staff all left at this point. but fair enough
u still didnt say what the update is? that za/um is failing as a company? I think anyone could have predicted that with the ways in which public opinion shifted
Here's my take as a neutral outsider:
Ilmar: Definitely did a hostile takeover. Fraudulently or not is up to the courts to decide.
Robert: Screwed by Ilmar & co. Feel bad for him on one side, but he does have Steve Jobs syndrome: Perfectionist visionary to a fault, creating a toxic work environment.
Rostov/Helen: I think they meant well and just got screwed by Ilmar & co with unreasonable expectations and deadlines out of nowhere, to make them seem like bad lazy bosses and have reason for termination because they were loyal to Robert.
Coworkers: Their frustrations are fully understandable and warranted. Knew little about the bigger picture, but have to deal with the consequences every day nonetheless.
and here's my take as an alcoholic:
i need more wine.
or a nice lager.
or a whiskey that burns through your oesophagus.
[electrochemistry: success]
You forgot to mention that Robert clearly tried to screw the company and potentially endanger the employment of people who worked there by stealing the company's IP. The most reasonable guy in all of this is Argo, he is the only person who truly understands that Robert is an extremely toxic and manipulative narcissist with a huge ego who got the closest people to him fired and lost access to his IP, because of it.
So glad you did this deep dive. As a person with familiarity with securities and corporate law (in America only, not Estonia), I can't imagine a good explanation for the fake IP transaction/loan and it's extremely telling that Ilmar could only refer to informal talks and secret explanations.
The thing that pisses me off the most are the fans that decided to send death threats to the staff of Za/Um. That the staff were terrified of even doing these interviews fearing the fan backlash.
No matter how you feel on the situation on who’s in the right or wrongs. It’s never a justified reason to send death threats, especially death threats saying they will kill a parent’s child.
Not only is it wrong to send death threats, it's just flat out misguided to aim your anger at the staff who are not at fault for anything. It's a dispute between creative directors and the company's lead and major shareholder, not the company's employees.
It's like threatening the janitor for what a company does in the building they're cleaning. The staff didn't have a say in this dispute.
It's so against the point of DE too. Not that you should need it to tell you that!
"Gamer culture" is the worst offshoot of the awful "fan culture". An obsession with the product leads to an absurd sense of entitlement and disrespect for others. I love that this channel is called "People Makes Games", that hits right to the core lesson so many "fans" fail to grasp.
It's so short-sighted to know only few details about situation and conclude that you have whole picture and thus know what's right. People will change opinion based on emotions and emotions change when new information comes out. Sending death threats is the ultimatum. You should never do this, but even if you do you do it because you are 100% believing that you know everything - which is never true with this kind of 'drama'. Even after this video noone should proclaim that it's clear what happend.
"The mask has slipped from the face of capital. What remains at ZA/UM is a cold, careless company where managers wage war against their own creatives, where artistry is second to property, and where corporate strategy is formed by an arrogant disdain for their own audience."
Anyone looking at this video now should watch some of the rebuttal videos that criticize the reporting work done here:
Jamrock Hobo's recent 'About the disco elysium investigation' video and stushi's 'A response to the disco elysium investigation' - the latter of which has some lengthy back-and-forth in the replies from PMG and stushi worth reading.
Much of what those videos cover dispels some of the questionable narratives and shortcomings of the reporting done here.
Thank you for recommendations :3
sophie from mars also has a great video about this entire situation
TLDR? this video by itself is 2:30:00 and tbh I'm kinda lost in all the nuance by now
no he sucks
To me this looks like a group of people that all suffer from severe burnout blaiming their circumstances on each other. And a handful of money people taking advantage of them.
i cannot agree with this statement hard enough so i am commenting to let you know how much i agree here
Yeah the whole point of “excessively long vacations” feels like workers resenting the ones who got their rights instead of the bosses who forced them to crunch and take shorter breaks.
@@andrekanasiro728 The internal hierarchy certainly didn't help. Robert and Helene didn't take on the responsibility and weren't cut to be leaders, yet they ended up in that positions. Judging from the interviews they're complicit of holding on to power too and dishonest about (maybe even to themselves) how much they can realistically shoulder. Resentment is inevitable if your higher ups force you to take over their share of work unprompted and f*cked off to vacations that you also should be able to take, and then got their names credited in place of your and others' names.
I must say that if I understand correctly, the initial production for DE was supposed to be close to a year, and after release the final cut followed about a year later. A year for any complex game, much less a complex writing heavy CRPG sounds like absolute hell, and I'm more upset that the non-core creatives didn't also get a chance to rest from that crunch rather than that those three extended theirs so long.
@@andrekanasiro728 The feeling that I get from their interviews it's not that they resent the fact that they went on vacations, but that they did not do the work of a lead in the position those 3 were, then shoved a good chunk of their work responsabilities onto the workers themselvess, then went on vacations, and then extended them.
I feel that no matter how much vacation time you personally get, if your boss (who is a first degree asshole if we believe the workers) is incompetent in ther position as a leader, shoves half their work onto you and goes on a vacation, and then extends that vacation you would (rightfully) resent them. That's not how things operate in a group. If you need to stop for a week or so to relax a bit before continuing then sure, other workers can shoulder your responsabilities for a bit.
But 3 months? If you need to stop for that long pause the entire project. If the executives then say "no" then you have a case for something else but as the employees describe the situation it was basically "hey, could you take over me for a week so I can relax a bit?" and then the employees learned they fucked off for 3 months god knows where which I would be extremely pissed off at them if I was there.
There was no talk with the employees about the situation, no "hey, could we stop for a while to recover from burnout?", nothing. They just went away and left the employees holding the pieces and ressponsabilities of continuing the project without them.
I'm a UK law student, and being so moved by Disco Elysium while writing my dissertation, this video perfectly marries my two obsessions.
Robert can be a shitty and toxic boss, Rostov and Helen can avoid accusations against them, AND they can all be fucked over by the majority share holders/have their IP stolen. These situations don't tend to be black and white - what I will say is that I believe the writers and stand with the workers. If something criminal has taken place, the accusations of bullying, clique culture and such should not be used to try to disguise this - although they should be taken seriously and given the space they require. This was excellent journalism that NEEDS to be supported.
Imagine profiteering off the broken legal system and then having the balls to type online like anyone respects your opinion at all
@@opiliones4202 I'm not profiting off of any system - I'm a student in the UK (broke as hell) and volunteer for a pro-bono legal advice service at my uni, which offers free legal services to the community. I agree that the system is broken and campaign for reform through my work.
@@opiliones4202 lmao what a sanctimonious comment
@@epileptictrees5213 Lad saw the words "law student" and instantaniously got mad
It's possible that there's both fishy stuff being done by the shareholders AND that Kurvitz was legitimately fired for being toxic and impossible to work with.
What really set off my bullshit alarm is when he said he wasn't aware of his stake in Newlysium, and when he started spouting politics instead of answering some very specific questions (same for Hindpere).
Mind giving an update on this?
I will give you an update. Kompus got rid of anyone who had writing credits on original DE, including Tulik.
Well done, People Make Games, well done.
It's both disgraceful and dishonest journalism if there won't be a follow up video on this. You always, always follow up on the story you've picked up.
@@DawidUliczny-ro7eo are you saying that it's PMG's fault that Kompuys fired all of them? Because that's what it sounds.
@@Kivlov84 It was merely a well done for a quality, unbiased piece of gaming journalism.
But now that you mentioned it, there were reports that after documentary came out the working conditions in ZA/UM had gotten worse, so I wouldn't entirely rule it out.
@@DawidUliczny-ro7eowhy is the whistleblower responsable for any retaliatiory accions that the company may take? You sound like your angry you can not live in a fantasy and putting the blame on the guy that runied your inmersion
"The guy accused of major financial crimes promised me he didn't do it!"
Honestly i cant believe how, naive, they were. Never talked to a lawyer before that, never secured ip rights, as we know in almost every company you dont own the IP you created(example god of war and their creator david jaffe). Is something normal and you need legal advice to avoid that.
And trusting a guy that did FINANCIAL CRIMES previously like. I dont want to sound mean, but we can tell that these ppl are socialist/comunist
if anything that Disco Elysium taught me, people are complicated. My heart feels the most for the team and the writers and workers, like Argo. I hope that in the end SOMETHING BEAUTIFUL can still happen here. DE is my favorite game and I'm thankful for the feelings and story it gave me. No matter what happens with its future I want to thank the writers, programmers and artists who bore the brunt of all this chaos and made something fantastic.
There is no equivalency between Kurvitz and Kompus in terms of their "toxicity". Kurvitz being a bad manager doesnt mean he deserves to have his lifes work fraudulently taken from him. Should he be a boss again? Probably not. Should he have his IP back? Absolutely.
But was the IP ever solely in his hands, or should it be? Like really the only thing that would change is the size of the Ilmar's share. And that wouldn't get Robert the majority. Let him write his books or whatever, maybe a second chance with a separate studio under ZAUM or a basic writer position. But letting NetEase on it I am way less supportive of
"Fraudulently"? Did the case end already or are we just assuming there was fraud because Kompus sounds shady?
@@roumaaana basic writer position? Why? Elysium is his baby. The best situation, only of respect to the other workers at ZAUM, would be that both studios share the Elysium IP. Kurvitz should be allowed to do with what he created whatever he want
@@AgusSimoncelli Also how do you expect cohesive development of the world with such separation?
@@roumaaan why do you need a cohesive development? Let each one of them do their thing.
Do you expect cohesive development out of media that happens in the Forgotten Realms for example? Elysium is a setting, many unrelated stories can happen in it.
And even if both groups make a game that involves the same characters with the same story, so what? Let the best one be selected by the public as "canon"
One thing this video neglects to mention is that there were many other developers fired alongside Kurvitz, Rostov, and Hindpere. Martin Luiga was briefly mentioned, but he makes clear in his medium post that there were other developers fired at the same time as he and the creative leads were. They may not want to be named or talk to press, but to leave any mention of that out isn’t painting a full picture. Firing around 10 members of the team (which was originally only around 30 people) is a pretty significant change and calls into question Ilmar’s claims that the firing was mostly due to managerial issues from Kurvitz. If Kurvitz is the problem and there was no financial impropriety, why fire so much of the team?
Furthermore, Kender and Haavel were employed as producers on the project. Why are none of the managerial failures laid at their feet? They were the ones actively managing the business side, development timeline, milestones etc. Are they not to blame for many of the managerial failures and challenges in addition to the alleged financial impropriety? I get they weren’t interested in speaking with you, but it seems pretty relevant that they were both principle investors of the project who were also deeply involved in managing the studio, and very little of the video focuses on their conduct.
Luiga went out way before the big attention to the game. As an Estonian, heard some rumors of some conflicts with people inside. You know, at the very moment when the creative leads very much still were the only leads.
So much this. In this video Helen talks about how she was verbally berated by Haavel, didn’t have deadlines communicated to her by Kender, and was made to sign a new contract every 2 years so she wouldn’t be entitled to benefits. Any one of those three things is, in my view, far worse than anything Kurvitz was accused of (and that’s assuming every accusation against Kurvitz was completely accurate). But PMG didn’t comment on it, follow up on it, or even really draw attention to it in any way. It’s just put there before the conversation goes back to how much of a big meanie Robert was, and moralising about how he isn’t addressing the criticisms made against him. It’s honestly pretty disgusting the way that this doc seems to conveniently forget that Robert, Helen, and Alexander were themselves workers and their legitimate grievances against the company were given *far* less weight than those of the other workers which were very clearly motivated by other factors (namely, excusing financial crime)
@@starryscar22 oh absolutely, in light of new information that has come out in the last few days, with more developers leaving the studio and speaking out, it’s even more clear that People Make Games dropped the ball with this one. It’s a huge embarrassment that they put out this garbage video and they should be ashamed for doing what is essentially a hit piece against the fired creative leads on Disco Elysium.
Last I checked, old Marty's a bit too busy frothing away in a rubber room somewhere to contribute much.
It's possible for someone to be an asshole and still have their life's work stolen, and for that to be unfair despite him being an asshole (if that is indeed the case).
Problem is people aren’t rational or dispassionate enough to separate the two.
I feel like what this video is missing is an interview with a completely independent 3rd party CFO of a similarly sized company to know "how much of this weird money movement is actually weird?" Like I feel like Ilmar's case could really do with some analysis by someone who actually knows what things mean
Yeah, that would be interesting to know.
I've tangentially been knowledgeable of some corporate financial transactions that seemed odd, but we're completely above board, simply due to corporate structuring and timing on how the transactions needed to take place.
the biggest problem here is the distintion between illegal and shady. Is it shady? Oh god absolutely, neo liberal EU allows for this shit,
But is it illegal? That's the big question here. Moreover, what and how much illegal it is. The purchase might be legal but the payments through the gf/wife shareholder might be illegal, etc etc etc...
Unfortunately I don't know Latvia's law, or england's... I lost myself a bit understanding if this was being trialed in latvia, Estonia or England, or EU courts
@@Kishuy I think this is the big thing, yeah he could have nicked it from them but accounting wizardry is an artform and I’d wager these business types know it well. Shady most likely but not illegal
@@StanleyKubick1 I can but they aren't good references.
It's murky and lots of corruption.
South American markets and South east asia markets specific as well as India, some African Markets and for funzies, some states in the US.
But it isn't a 1:1 comparisson and I know to few details to make any sure acessments. I just know too little about the case unfortunately, hence why I raise the question that it might actually be legal.
For example, in most EU countries to prove corruption someone has to physically wire/give money to another person.
Say you bought them a gucci bag and then their wife sold a gucci bag? Nope, might be ilicit gains or some IRS tax violation, but it isn't corruption. You will notice, if you live in EU, that alot of your elective representatives get trips and football tickets etc for free and VIP treatment in them. Alot of their sponses also do quite nice deals with the government or with each other.
Bloody hell Chris, asking the pointed questions in these interviews in such a naturalistic and non-confrontational manner is so damn impressive
He is working hard thought those nerves you can tell.
I know right?? I was absolutely blown away at the interviewing skills shown off in the video! Very diplomatic and effective, 10/10
Yeah he was great pressing those questions on behaviour and expecting something else than a shift in tone. After that he failed to lead the conversation in a way that would sprout more meaningful insights instead only clumsily forcing a submissive response. No, he isn't a good interviewer, mediocre at best
@@someones_daughter_ I noticed that immediately
the biggest failing of this video are his interviews. he is passive, apologetic, and unconfident. it’s very telling that his skill is in prepared writing/reporting, not in live interviewing.
As ZA/UM gets more and more gutted, this is gonna become the poster child of shitty "both sides" amateur journalism.
This isn't really true "both sides" journalism. It clearly favors the corpos. PMG held Kurvitz to a higher standard for responding (and of course he didn't react well because he's actively being gaslighted), while letting Ilmar K. off the hook with answers such as "we'll see what happens during the trial."
@@pnpgutterfold Whast else can be said, without facing a lawsuit legally? Declaring that they are guilty of financial crimes without passing through the courts first could get him under very hot water. And from what the other workers said, Kurvitz was 100% an abusive artist.
@@Hypogean7 You are correct in that declaring guilt prior to trial opens them up to a lawsuit and there is also no denying that Kurvitz was abusive. Regardless, an update on the situation is warranted because there is now so much more information that has come to light that responsible journalism would require a revisit. This is what people meant by this video not aging well.
Journalism isn't a one-and-done thing, there needs to be updates once the story changes. The toxicity at ZA/UM has not subsided despite Kurvitz' departure and that should clue you in on the complexity of the situation and how the narrative against Kurvitz was utilized for inappropriate gains. Jamrock Hobo has done a couple of updates since this video that merits a watch.
sometimes there are things where one thing sucks and the other doesn't, but I guess you gotta ignore that for "journalism"
This isn't really true "both sides" journalism. It clearly favors the corpos. PMG held Kurvitz to a higher journalistic standard during the interview (and of course he didn't react well because he's actively being gaslighted), while letting Ilmar K. off the hook by accepting answers such as "we'll see what happens during the trial" (assuming that the courts will administer justice).
Honestly, the only person here who didn't present their case well was Ilmar. On Robert's end, he doesn't even necessarily deny he was toxic, which he clearly was, but he does importantly point out that his removal was clearly motivated by something shady and likely illegal on the money side.
Based on what's presented in this video (and maybe I'm missing something) it seems the other devs and writers had concerns and issues with him, but that his firing came long before any action by the ZA/UM team to push him and the others out. He's right; his bad behaviour (which he absolutely should be held accountable for) is a scapegoat for what looks to be a lot of illicit behaviour (like the funneling of money to a woman who has nothing to do with the company, for example).
The fact that IP theft (with no evidence) was the original reason with toxicity only coming up later is so shady. I think Robert's an egomaniac and a bit of an asshole, but in terms of his rights as a creator and IP holder he deserves some justice. I just wish it wasn't at the expense of the other writers, devs, creatives still at ZA/UM.
yes; It seems like in a ideal world, he and Zaum employees would share the rights to the disco elysium world, and at most he'd remain a consultant, sharing his talent with the team without being in a leadership position when he can hurt people, and remains free to keep going on his own projects.
@@maximeteppe7627 lol no in his ideal world he's the CEO/studio head/creative director. There was like a whole section about him trying to politic his way back into being in charge.
It's just his idea, but he didn't make Disco Elysium.
He owns part of the studio & a larger part of DE2. Both of which would be worth a significantly larger sum of money if he wasn't a cunt, showed up to work, & didn't try to take the source code to go start another company. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
That's not true at all. Robert clearly tells a contradictory story than the one the workers tell, explicitly says the toxicity charges were not brought up when he worked there, and when confronted by that he refuses to reply. I don't see how that is presenting his case well at all
@@maximeteppe7627 Which would be how they would have organized it, if the loudest voices in their group were actual communists, rather than assholes putting on leftism as a fashion choice. I'm of course talking about Robert.
If he actually cared about his ideological roots, he would allow the workers to own the company, and be part of leading it. But in stead, he was a tyrannical boss that fights tooth and nail to wrest control of some intangible property. Property a communist would want to not exist. A communist would not rent the IP to ZA/UM in the first place, much less sell it as he later did, but give it freely as open source to anyone.
Not only the longest extensive video on the matter, but the only one that I`ve seen where they actually go directly to the sources, the agents of the situation instead of quoting parts from articles of multiple media without even mentioning what it is the supposed source. All that and keeping the journalist opinion part of the article clearly separated and bunch together in one section. This is what journalism was supposed to be and so tremendously rare nowadays, bravo.
Nice job both-sidesing this issue guys, I'm sure it'll age gracefully and won't make you look like mouthpieces for shareholders at ALL
Encyclopedia: It did not, in fact, age gracefully.
They didn't truly engage in both-sidesing. To me, they clearly favored the corpos. They put way too much blind faith and weight onto the "the courts will decide" defense (which really is a corporate defense) and ended up demonizing Kurvitz by pressing him harder on questions than they did Ilmar K. Kurvitz reacted defensively, but that's actually normal given that he's being actively gaslighted with these questions. The misogyny he was being accused of was still happening in ZA/UM after he was fired and they later found out it was mostly Tonis/Dennis H. who was the master manipulator.
I find crazy that in the west now we can use "work place toxicity" to excuse theft and fraud. I get it, the original team were no business men and were probably very hard to work with and under a lot of pressure but Ilmar is a very dodgy guy and I personally think it wouldn't be hard for him to cross that line into criminal. Also talking about toxicity, what about Helen's treatment from Ilmar, it goes both ways if they want to play this game. I went in open minded knowing nothing about this but my sympathies are now definitely on Robert and his teams side.
Interviewer: "yeah maybe the Ilmar guy is a criminal but.... (Alleged) tOxCiCiTy!"
More like you're using fraud as an excuse to defend workplace toxicity like every other aging conservative snowflake. Kurvitz's behaviour would be a reasonable cause to demote or fire him in any situation. The fucked up way zaum was taken over doesn't mean he should be reinstated into a position of authority within the company
What's up with the part about Hindpere as Lead Writer on the Final Cut? I feel like I missed something, everything about her is built around that, like "maybe she got fired because she didn't work?", but she says she was also responsible for VO? Why isn't this a bigger deal? The whole game had VO in the Final Cut, this is a huge part of it, but we're only hearing writers say she didn't write.
And that part about the deadline is really confusing too? Like obviously people are complaining about the people just above them, I'm sure they won't have anything bad to say about the dudes they never interacted with (or the wife of a dude they never interacted with).
Anyways, like many, I don't doubt at all the fact that it was a difficult place to work at (and honestly I don't see how people could have seen ZA/UM as a place that would be cool to work at), but I also don't really think the last part about the mail is deserved. If all three of them were indeed not fired for toxicity, then I get why they wouldn't want to play the game and talk about that, because no matter how at fault they are, it's only paying into their opponents hands.
What were they supposed to say "yeah we fucked up, we're creatives, not managers"? Even if that's what they think, that would only give more ammo to the idea that they were rightfully fired.
Need this upvoted more. It's astute to point out that it's pointless to pass judgment on the ability of either side to self-criticize, at least until all or any upcoming court battles are well behind them
Also AGREED, there was a lot clearly going on with Helen that didn't get fully explained
Jim worked in VO
She was Robert GF
@@DiabloResourcesChannel This, nothing more to it
@@iateabagelonce - Especially when part of the reason for firing Robert (allegedly) was his patriarchal and inappropriate behaviour towards Helen (which Helen denies happening for what it's worth), but then they also fired HELEN at the same time?
The deadline thing is also pretty obvious. Sure the writer didn't get deadlines from Helen until last moment, apparently neither did Helen get any from the execs. So can hardly blame here there.
And yeah maybe she didn't write a word, but she did lead the VO effort, with no experience, for a massive game, during a pandemic. Were the other writers aware of that?
I think the fact that both Helen and Rostov were fired alongside Robert makes this just a lot more shady.
I really thought this story wasn’t going to be covered anymore and people would just forget about it, like any other controversy in the games industry. Thanks for putting so much work into reporting on this and giving us just a bit more clarity on the ZA/UM situation.
I think it’s remained in public consciousness because it’s an interesting story. It feels like it could be the underlying motive for the central murder of DE2.
I'm just gonna copy and paste a comment from the Disco Elysium reddit that says it better than I ever could
"I didn't think I'd write a whole essay on this, but alas, this game saved me from alcoholism so I'm beholden to feel passionately about this topic to the point that I want to spill my guts after seeing this.
After about a year of tuning into what little news we could receive from this, this video definitely gave us more than we needed to know about the issues, but I definitely felt like it was worth putting out because of the fact that completely uninvolved people have received threats from the community that are completely unwarranted. But for anyone who might
read my comment, I feel it's worth noting that whatever issues arise between employees and Robert and the founding members of ZA/UM, have absolutely no bearing on the actual legal disputes between Kurvitz and Rostov having their creative effort taken away from them.
TLDR; I don't feel like it was right to make 1/3 of the video about employee grievances against the creators of Disco Elysium, when the central focus is the legal dispute regarding the creators having their IP taken from them by an executive who, through questionable means, became majority shareholder and ousted them.
While I agree that it sucks that there was apparently a bad working environment due to the "ZA/UM inner circle", that's not what this dispute is about and this is not going to be the avenue by which that issue is resolved. This can be perceived as ultimately attempting to disenfranchise the creators who are trying to retrieve their intellectual property after being wrongfully ousted from the company.
By playing on elements of worker solidarity, workplace toxicity, and saying that all workers have contributed to the IP, it stokes division in the public opinion of the people who were actually wronged so that the capitalist who attempted to steal the profits of their creative labor can carry on knowing that it's bad PR for a little while, but if the creators are painted in a bad light in the meantime it can divert attention of their hostile takeover of the company and allow them to continue doing whatever they want with the IP with no repercussions if the law chooses to side with them in the end.
/end tldr
Ask yourself this, what do these employees really have to gain from supporting Kurvitz? He is right to say that they are being used, even if they don't realize it in strict terms. They have bills to pay, families to feed, etc. and speaking in explicit terms, they have no reason to support him if he's not providing their income, but ZA/UM studios is. I have no doubt that he probably is a difficult person to work with, I am sure they all have their difficulties like in any other collaborative setting, but nonetheless it doesn't really have any bearing on the fact
that the main point of this whole thing, is that these people created a world and idea prior to the game even being developed, and had it robbed from them. While it is sad that some of the writers contributed in meaningful ways to the overall project by adding unique characters and stories to the overall narrative, it doesn't justify taking the whole thing from the people who conceptualized it in the first place.
You can see that this whole weaponization of people's personal qualms with dealing with Robert and company in how they collaborate, is approved by Ilmar Kompus in the beginning, when he gives free reign to the employees to speak to the PMG crew. He signs off on this, because he knows that even people like Argo have no personal gain in supporting Robert, and that even if you take a fair position, it only solidifies this narrative being built against Robert and Rostov to sway the public opinion so that ZA/UM's next game won't immediately get panned by the community to show solidarity to them.
(Suggestion: "It's easier to get people to stop supporting a cause, if they feel like the cause is headed up by bad people.")
Basically it boils down to being in a rock and a hard place, which is synonymous with having idealizations of worker solidarity in a capitalist world anyways. You can either support the people who came up with this fantastic setting, or you can support the workers, who have no choice but to stick with their jobs and pay the bills, regardless of how they feel because worker solidarity is about taking care of the workers. Argo had a reasonable stance in the video by saying that his friends should be able to have their world they made and do what they want with it, but that shouldn't lead to people losing their jobs. Unfortunately this dispute has escalated beyond that outcome.
Robert is also in a hard place because all he can say in a way that stays true to his ideals, is that he chooses not to participate in the accusations of toxicity in the workplace not because
he doesn't want to deal with it, but because he identifies it as being weaponized against him to pull public opinion away from him and keep the company profitable when the next project is released. I'm sure if he is the communist he claims to be, and that his writing reflects, he'll open a dialogue about his behavior to the other employees who felt wronged by them. Clear the air with no expectation that any of them support him in his legal dispute, but rather to set aside any bad blood that might've coagulated during development. Not for any tangible
benefit, but because mutual respect is also a tenet of worker solidarity and communal ideological thinking.
I will say that while I understand that PMG needed something substantial in their investigation into the topic to justify the overhead costs of traveling to interview and meet with people, I don't agree with making 1/3 of the video center on the personal disputes between employees and the creators. While it may seem to justify the overall goal of
establishing all sides of the issue, it has nothing to do with the legal dispute that is the main focus of the controversy surrounding this game, and serves as fluff to engage viewers in discussion which serves the tangible benefit of having more viewers tune in if they choose to be engaged in this dispute. (Rhetoric:"People love gossip and drama sire.")
Ultimately this serves to disenfranchise the actual issue, and in truth, I feel as though it is
less than morally correct to air these sorts of grievances in relation to the legal dispute to the public forum for debate, as these are interpersonal disputes that can only be resolved by the people who are involved, not by the larger internet community as a whole who quite simply, weren't there. It also benefits only one party in this, which is Ilmar Kompus himself, who I am sure most of us agree based on his motivations and interview, is definitely in the wrong no matter who you support. In a way, he has inextricably tied his fight with the workers so that if he goes down, they all do, and there's no guarantee that Kurvitz can or will extend employment to them if the dispute is resolved in his favor.
I feel as though this paints a "both sides-ism" that we're expected to adopt into our understanding on the issue, which is that the executives/investors are bad because they are predatory businessmen exploiting the success of the game for their own benefit and attempting to cut the creators out to solidify their position at the head of a now award winning indie studio that could see success in the future, vs. the creator is bad because he was verbally abusive to employees, did not work on the game after the release, is problematic as a person, and attempted to steal his IP back in very unclear methods and start his own company with the same IP (which I can't see that ever working without even greater legal disputes arising)
But this narrative of putting the employees in the middle of the case is just gross and attempting to fracture support by appealing to leftist sensibilities that the fandom is known for. The cut and dry is that they created the IP, they're being robbed of it, and there's no legal outcome that benefits the workers either way so there's no point in having their perspective other than to make the creators less sympathetic in the public eye which invariably benefits the guy robbing them in the first place." - simiman
While you view the legal dispute as the central focus, perhaps PMG simply don't see it that way, or at least as strictly as you. Both the legal dispute over the IP and the workplace toxicity are aspects of the controversy (or at least are two related controversies), and they reported on them. At the very least, Ilmar claimed Robert was fired for this reason, so PMG needed to investigate the veracity of this claim. I think there's a good chance Ilmar is using this to his advantage to cover his situation, but it's not PMGs fault that there seems to be truth to the allegations of toxicity, even if it's not why they were fired.
I would argue that the toxicity situation is more related than just a distraction though. Ilmar is clearly good at business. I'm sure it would have been more financially sensible for him to keep Robert on board if he wasn't causing trouble. Robert's vision and writing skills were undeniably a valuable asset. The executives probably realized that their business was not sustainable if Robert was to continue harming the company internally by trying to lead, and since Robert had no intention on giving up his direct leadership (even by leading indirectly, mediated by the replacement lead writer), they decided to remove him. Did they steal Robert's life work by swindling him with shady corporate deals? Of course, and I think just about everyone who watched this is on the same page. It's obviously wrong, but I also think Robert's toxicity as a leader is an important part of the story.
Also, I think part of PMGs motivation was explicitly to tell the story of the other employees who are being unfairly harassed.
This video aged so fucking badly
Why is that?
@@HeraBek The “conspiracy theory” alleged in this video came to pass. The money men at ZA/UM just announced they’ve axed pretty much everyone involved in Disco Elysium and cancelled plans for future DLC with the game. They used corporate power to hijack the IP from anyone who actually had a role in creating it.
@@HeraBek ZA/UM has since cancelled the sequel game and laid off a bunch of the staff leading to more coming out about how terrible upper management really was
@@HeraBekWatch Jamrock Hobo! He gets into it and did a fantastic piece criticizing PMG's handling of the story. I feel foolish now for believing PMG's reporting that made Kurvitz's emotional reaction look suspect when it's really the most honest thing in the video (with Ilmar K.'s relative nonchalance being the thing that is truly suspect).
@@pnpgutterfold you do realize Kurvitz is a manipulative diva?
I beg of you, when talking about many different names in short succession, please keep names up on the screens, maybe even with their portraits. I know it doesn't make for fancy editing, but it would be so helpful for following along of who did or said what. Especially when names start with the same letter and are unfamiliar to me, I'm completely lost. Giving them some kind of jobtitle or relation to the topic of the video would also be great.
Yes this is helpful!!!!
Yeah I struggled with this while watching as well. I had read up on this situation before but not enough to remember their names.
kurvitz' misconduct is an issue and I feel terrible for the workers caught between everything, but I hope people realize that it doesn't take away from the severity/issue of IP theft
The reason kurvitz and co were fired isn't the real issue, the issue is how Ilmar achieved the power to fire them in the first place
Aged like fucking milk
kinda sad how this is the most popular video on this subject
First, I want to thank people at People Make Games for all their hard work. It shouldn't go without appreciation 💜.
Now, it seems to me that there are two separate issues that kind of intertwine, but aren't the same and shouldn't be treated as the same.
One of them is extremely emotional and it may make us forget the bigger picture: Working with Robert Kurvitz seems to have been really difficult and he has hurt others with his attitude, but that doesn't explain why he was fired without a formal warning first (when we have waaaay worse cases of discrimination and abuse in workspaces that go unsolved until there's economic incentive) and his actions sure don't justify firing Helen and Rostov as well. Clearly, there were other motives (them realising something was going on with the buyout) to dispose of them.
That said, using workers leaves and absences to crush the rest of the staff and make them resent them, is a classic. If being understaffed was a problem, which clearly was, and Robert and Rostov's health was in bad shape, MORE people should've been hired or deadlines should've been expanded.
It's indisputable that the CEO of the company was making a lot of money and that workers didn't need to go through that crunch again.
Robert's attitude should've been dealt with, and it's sad that he doesn't seem to acknowledge it, but I don't believe for one second that it was the source of this debacle, just the perfect smoke screen: his coworkers weren't happy with him and that's great ammunition to cover the possibly fraudulent operations that left Ilmar as the majority stakeholder.
Edit: fixing some spelling and grammar
And also, Robert and friends deserved the vacations, and probably all the other workers deserved one as well. The problem is that I don't think that's necessarily Robert's fault, in the Helen case it even seems that the problems came from producers and executives, not from her. In the worst case Robert is an absolute asshole, but the sudden deadlines, lack of communication and poor management seems to stem from producers and executives, not Robert and certainly not his friends.
1000% agree!
@@ranzu3138 Yup, I get why the other devs feel like it was unfair for them. It was, but that fury probably should be directed somewhere else. I hope they can sort things out 💜
yeah, this.
@@BigBadWolframio yeah, ideally all of the staff would have seen it as unfair and demanded a better arrangement for everyone
I really appreciate all the work you guys put into videos like these. There's plenty of great videogame journalism out there but I think perceptions can often be a little skewed in the gaming community. It's an interesting, artistic industry, like any other, and seeing such great, informative work being produced essentially for free online is lovely.
This video is an ugly stain on an otherwise unimpeachable body of work from PMG. It was pretty poor when it released, but in the 8 months since then it has become even more egregious. This really ought to be taken down, out of respect for the former workers at ZA/UM.
Taking it down is not the solution, but abridging or amending it is. It's still providing us with more information than any other source, but PMG needs to live up to the fact that their journalistic standards slipped here (by placing too much emphasis on things the courts can't resolve, they dropped the ball on pressuring both sides and mostly went after Kurvitz).
I think the pandemic is the secret third villain in all this. Ilmar and his bros took advantage of Robert's problematic behavior + isolation of everyone during the pandemic to foster miscommunication and mistrust. It's clear Robert is a charismatic a-hole that made everyone around him love or hate him (or both). And it's clear that Ilmar and co are slimy financial criminals. But the pandemic was the lever that Ilmar used to turn the situation to his advantage and screw the egotistical diva out of his life's work.
I hope the criminals face consequences, the employees get justice, and that Robert gets therapy.
oh yes the pandemic, let's hear it
@@eewlsNo capitalization, no text effects, no punctuation save a single comma- and yet your words drip with sarcasm. They’ve said their piece, now what’s your deal?
@@eewls Cope harder
What Argo says about Robert's way of delivering critique almost feels similar to "management by perkele" from Finland.
Edit: Chris, hope you read this, but kudos from my side on your trying to respectfully be the bearer of loaded topics between people, especially given their decades-long friendships that now have soured a bit. That cannot have been fun at all.
MY OPINION AS A LABOUR ORGANISER after watching this is: absolutely the writers and workers deserve a share, and also, seems reasonable that they were mistreated. To give the (sliver) of credence to the capitalist side - sure, a story was spun which does not cover the entirety of the complexity of the issue. However, I think it's clear their employer started snowing them about the situation by making out it's all a big co-incidence and to use the legitimate grievances of the workers as a retconned rationale for firing people they had been salivating over cutting out of the profits for months. Plays out like in strikes - you can't convince one side, so you convince the other side of your own warped narrative, and then meanwhile use the whole conflict to your advantage.
They suits played workers and artists against each other.
My thoughts exactly, thanks for putting it in words better than I could.
Glad I wasn't the only one with this perspective. I mean, so much of this video seems to revolve around the fact that Kurvitz, Hindpere and Rostov took personal time off after 5 years of working long hours and crunch time,and the perspective here seems to be, "we resent them for it" rather than "we should all be taking time off and it's unfair of management to be pushing and changing headlines on the fly". CLassical divide and conquer tactics.
Ilmar gained majority share using money he stole from the company and they still blame Robert, paint him as villain of this story lol .
I’m only halfway through it but I already can’t see how the content of Robert’s and others characters has anything to do with the apparent hostile takeover that took place. He can be a toxic person to work with, that doesn’t excuse and has nothing to do with the theft.
Like, PMG themselves spend considerable amount of time showing all the shady machinations that the current CEO and the his partners have done - opening new companies; shareholders coming and going; making extremely questionable money transfers, etc. I think all that should’ve been the sole focus of the video.
Yet there’s so much benefit of the doubt extended to the literal millionaires. The interview with the current owner is ___incredibly gentle___to say the least.
From what I’ve seen already I just don’t think you can do “actually both sides are bad” in this situation.
I don't think Robert's toxicity excuses the corporate takeover either, but I don't think that the video pushes that idea. At the basic level, his toxicity was cited as the reason for pushing him out, so it makes sense that they would investigate it. Deeper though, it seems that his toxicity is being intentionally used as a PR shield by Ilmar, which makes it directly related to the situation. Without addressing the toxicity and seeing directly that it isn't enough to explain the theft, we simply wouldn't be getting the whole picture. However, once you do address the toxicity, you need to make sure that story is told carefully as well because it's also a serious situation.
In short, there are simply two aspects of the story. Neither justifies the other, but the story isn't completely without both parts. A simple story about evil investors stealing an artists work would be cleaner, but that just isn't the whole story here, even if it's the more significant half.
This game means so much to me making this whole ordeal doubly heartbreaking. Can’t even imagine how the creators are feeling.
There is an overarching issue here that is taking away from a clear lack of responsibility for the workers at the heart of this project by higher ups on both the creative and business side of things.
A fantastic piece of journalism on a difficult to decipher case
This was a bad, bothsiding video at release, but time has made it even worse.
Not really. At the end of the day, Kurvitz was still a bastard. Any financial magic will have to be settled in court, but the point of this video was to show that there was more to this kerfuffle than just one factor. In the end, Fortress Accident was a cry for help from all angles from the people under Kurvitz and management.
"We asked [Argo Tuulik] how the studio culture changed at ZA/UM after the departure of most of the original writing team and the airing of the People Make Games documentary looking into the legal battle that ensued afterward." It's like transitioning from the Soviet Union into the fascist Russian Federation," Tuulik said. "Wearing the dead cultural movement like a skin costume, roleplaying communism, lying for dollars and yen. PMG doc changed lots of things in the studio. Personal dynamics. None for the better.""
-GLH article, 'Last Disco Elysium Writer Laid Off by ZA/UM Speaks Out.'
"The hate PMG is getting for their ZA/UM piece is undeserved. Chris followed the truth -- all of it, not just the convenient bits -- and gave a voice to the voiceless in the fire. Gave us a chance, and me the strength to stand against the incompetence and injustice in the studio."
-Argo Tuulik, February 17th 2024, Twitter
@@gab_gallardthe communards really don't like that part. Goes against their inframaterialist view
@@benjavideojuegos this nasally Shapiro-ist bit doesn't really work when you look like an even more syphilitic Kevin Smith
@@fluffy9071 you can't seem to get that jew out of your head. Does he makes your heart beat faster when he is around? ♥️
@@benjavideojuegos Mentioned him once, and I "can't get him out of my head"? Seems like a typical homoerotic, homophobic fascist projection
Coming from a huge fan of the video game, I had little to no idea of what the behind-the-scenes drama looked like. Thank you for this. You’re doing amazing work. ❤️
Incredible work. Games journalism is alive and well. Thank you for digging deep into things even when it's not easy.
ooh which is worse white collar criminals or some possibly overbearing creatives we simply cant say
And tankies still ignoring the people between, who got hit the most, your regular workers. Those between the businessman and the personality cult object. Why care about workers, who said they didnt have a good working environment? For such a big commie game I am sure no need to care about the workers at all.
having rewatched it, calling it a "potential" conspiracy is laughable, 2 people in a meeting room is a conspiracy.
it might be a fairly niche subject, so i'm not sure how well this vid will do viewerwise. but please remember that this kind of stuff is incredibly important and I think tackling such issues in a fair and balanced way even if it might not be the best financial decision is extremely admirable and should absolutely be rewarded more than it is.
Unless you have some solution to how we do business on the whole, videos like this will only be rare blips rather than common place.
@@guitardude1243 I don't, which is why i said should.
Donate to the Patreon!
I'm so thankful that you gave the employees the opportunity to speak and be heard. It's heartbreaking to hear the struggles of development on the original game and final cut, dealing with bad management and extra responsibilities pushed on them, and then after all that they have to endure death threats because of a dispute over an issue that doesn't involve any of them. I hope that however all of this works out, all these employees get to keep working on projects they care about and enjoy with better management.
I'm not saying that Robert was a good leader (in fact, most creatives are AWFUL leaders), but this video doesn't sound right. Why has more of the video been focused on Robert's character as a leader? I've had a listen to this whole thing, and it sounds like the three lead creatives wanted a significant break after they finished work on Disco Elysium. And why not? Heck, it would make sense to let the rest of the employees have a break too (and that's usually what happens in the industry!). But it sounds more like the big three (Kaur, Haavel and Ilmar) encouraged the leads to take their breaks, and then while those breaks were happening, they decided to push forward without them. In fact, it sounds like Robert and Rostov were then demoted when they got back. Robert continued to try to retain creative influence, and Rostov's work suffered because of it (to which he apologises during the interview, it seemed he wasn't aware of how big a toll it took). Meanwhile Helen was Lead writer in name only (as she wasn't there when writing began, which actually suggests to me they wanted any excuse to get rid of her), but because of that job title, she was still allowed in meetings that cut Robert out (baiting Robert into interfering with the meeting, because obviously, things were getting worse for him, and they weren't going to make it easy to resolve). When Robert and Rostov tried to get back their positions as leads, the owners said no, and promptly made things even more difficult for everyone, eventually sacking all three leads for 'not doing their jobs' when that was exactly what they were trying to do.
The accusation of IP theft is kept really small in this video, even though it's the huge thing that Ilmar is accusing Robert of. Given that this accusation is a he-said-she-said (there's no evidence this happened, there's only two people claiming it did), I don't think it has a leg to stand on. Also the fact that the companies accused (that Robert was supposedly going to sell to) are not consistent is an interesting point. Given Robert has made it quite clear he has no intention on selling his IP to anyone (assuming he gets it back), it's interesting that Ilmar is quite insistent that Robert wanted to sell it to someone else. Why would he be that desperate to get it back to sell it on if he also wants to make a sequel in a new studio? Doesn't make total sense.
Kaur's involvement in the whole debacle needs further digging into. Obviously he's been instructed to lay low. Haavel's involvement at all is really alarming, he is literally a fugitive. Why Ilmar is protecting him and giving him a job (and paying him THROUGH HIS WIFE), I have no idea. By the way, just because the payments that were coming from the company have stopped, that doesn't mean he isn't still doing this. He could be paying himself a higher salary and paying the wife through his own income - since, as is claimed, Haavel worked directly for him before he was involved with ZAUM. Also Ilmar is quite clearly a fraud, and that other businessman, Mag-whateverhisnameis, is involved. Why else would he offer the guy a stake in a future endeavour after Kaur has made him out to be the bad guy?
The way I see it, we need to focus on the actual crimes committed, because the alleged IP theft Robert is being accused of is just not going to stick. Then Robert and friends can make up for being shitty to each other over this mess. Whether Disco Elysium 2 happens after that... who knows.
Silence commie
I agree, i thought Roberts response to the toxic work environment accusation was pretty much perfect.
The issue isn't why Ilmar decided to fire Robert and co, it's how the hell Ilmar managed to get into a position to fire them in the first place.
Agreed. The video unfortunately totally misses the mark when it comes to journalistic reporting. There is a clear bias (in favor of the capitalists) and an unfair one at that.
This just felt more like a character assassination than an actual legal documentary.
"Guys he was so mean though" nevermind the accusation of fraud, theft and embezzlement because the guy who potentially got his life work stolen from him was kind of an a-hole
yea, completely forgetting/minimizing all of the legal issues, not pushing back on anything the exec says, doing the interviews while legal procedings are still going on, limiting what the injured parties could say, interviewing people that are still in the studio, that are obviously going to carry water for the studio so they wont get fired or harm their positions in the company.
Even if all the accusations of rage/toxic workplace are true, it does not make the theft of the IP and world that Kurvitz and the others have been working on for almost a decade any better or justified.
PMG should either have waited for the legal procedings to end before doing this, or never have done it at all, massive journalistic blunder.
Seems like such a trivial question given the weight of the topic but: is this safe to watch spoiler-wise?
Yep!
Appreciate both the question and answer here, it's been on my list to play
After watching this full video, I wouldn't believe a single word coming out of Dennis Havel.
He writes an email to Robert saying he's treating Helen in a "patriarchal" manner but then goes on to scream at Helen for being terrible at her job and that she never should have held that role.
Dennis sounds like a caracature of every executive I've ever worked with.
chill, he just hasnt unlocked the feminism thought cabinet yet /s
It's amazing how poorly this documentary has aged. PMG really come off as bitter and snippy in the second half because Kurvitz didn't want to respond to office drama for a good headline and they in turn just took the executives at face value.
Yeah, they got lazy and trusted the system too much with the whole "the courts will decide" stance, which absolutely failed. This assumption gave the corpo execs the cover they needed to NOT be pressed as hard with questions as Kurvitz. PMG also pressured Kurvitz into a defensive stance, which made him look more suspicious, but honestly, most people would react that way if they're being actively gaslighted. PMG ate up the drama that Ilmar K. and Tonis/Denis H. fed them.
@@pnpgutterfoldgot any links or whatever so I can follow up on this story?
@@Iggysdust Yes. I don't think I can post links on YT, but if you just search for the 'Jamrock Hobo' channel there are two videos of interest: one is entitled 'About the Disco Elysium Investigation', and the other is 'Disco Elysium 2 just got cancelled and ZA/UM is burning'.
God forbid ppl asking of toxic behaviour in the workplace
Aged like milk
Awesome that you all did this. I don't think any other outlets who are more keen on shorter turnovers would have taken on such a big and daunting project. Great work!!!
Edit: Wow, Ilmar is a total douchebag. He's basically a criminal playing coy sitting on an ivory throne throughout his entire segment.
Incredible work, Chris and Annie! I once again feel hopeful for the future. Thank you everyone!
Thank you all for pouring your hearts and souls into Disco Elysium, it changed my life. And thank you for having the balls to do this interview, the same to all of your co-workers. Know that whatever part of yourselves you put into this, helped myself and many others in ways I can't really articulate.
Thank you for all the work you do! You guys were who inspired me to become a game dev and writer. Will be forever grateful ❤
I wish you the best.
You seemed like a very honest and kind person. I loved your work on Elysium and I hope you get to show that talent in many more ways into the future!
thank you for all your incredible work and your bravery & candour in the interview!
So at one side there is a big writer that social skills arent his best trait and ends up mistreating his staff. At the other side theres is a corpo guy that has history of sketchy bussiness ethics who literally robbed intelectual property of a formely broke creative team. And those, these two are in the same level of flawed morality?
it's almost like two things can be bad
wow the enlightened centrism of the moralintern@@Riley-uy5pe
@@Riley-uy5peYes, two things can be bad, but that doesn't mean that they somehow cancel each other out. This video evens the scales between these two bad things, which is the real crime. One is way worse than the other.
Hope you guys feel good about what you helped happen with your both sides mentality.
I think they just feel nothing about it because they don't give a shit.
This isn't really true "both sides" journalism. It clearly favors the corpos. PMG held Kurvitz to a higher journalistic standard during the interview (and of course he didn't react well because he's actively being gaslighted), while letting Ilmar K. off the hook by accepting answers such as "we'll see what happens during the trial" (assuming that the courts will administer justice). Now we know Tonis/Dennis H. is a sociopath.
What's wrong with both sides
@@gootzby Showing all sides of a story is great thing to do in reporting, but afterwards there is still an overarching narrative that needs to be woven, and journalists can still struggle to make sense of the information that they're given. Usually when someone is complaining about "both-sidesing" this is what they're referring to and not that they prefer biased reporting even though it might sound that way.
What's being criticized here isn't the volume of information PMG has gathered; it's how they're putting together the pieces, and also how they didn't hold each person they interviewed to the same exacting standards.
I mean clearly I don’t trust the guy buying up the stocks of the company. Even if he had good intentions in being sole owner, and he wanted to create a healthy work culture, he should have realized he needed the creatives help to make Disco 2. Plus, if he knew the other parties had issues, his purchasing decisions makes no sense as he stated it.
He's given us no reason to trust him. When you're the CEO of a multimillion dollar company your response to allegations like this should amount to more than "trust me bro".
I think he probably did take advantage of Roberts naivety around business, and gave himself as much as possible
Maybe they didn't really plan on making Disco 2.
Since the remaining creatives were able to do Final Cut without much help, it looks like they can just do that again and expand on the world and IP already owned by the company.
@@robertjohnpecayo8642 I don't know, the last update to the game included some new dialogues and let's just say they aren't really great
"he should have realized he needed the creatives help to make Disco 2." From all accounts, he did realize this, and tried to get them to work on it.
Thank you for doing this. I've been waiting for somebody to cover this incident for so long and I never could've dreamed it would be PMG who rose up to the challenge. Flying to all these cities in order to conduct in-person interviews has been crucial to allowing the viewers to wrap their heads around this story. When there are no clearly "good guys" or "bad guys" and the narrative is so convoluted, I found myself relying a lot on these interviews while forming my opinion.
One thing I noticed for instance, was the fact that Rostov barely got a word in while he was being interviewed alongside Kurvitz. Of course I don't know what the full interview looks like, but in these bits he only spoke up once and even then he got corrected by Kurvitz. The fact that both Rostov and potentially Hindpere felt like they could speak most freely when Kurvitz *wasn't* in the room really reminds me of the "cult leader" personality Argo mentioned. Not trying to actually accuse him of anything, but based on this footage I do think that Rostov silently nodding along to everything Kurvitz said was a bit of a red flag.
Then there was also Argo's interview. Chris was right to point out the nostalgic yet melancholic expression that appeared on his face when he got asked to talk about the early days of ZA/UM / Fortress Occident. It really did demonstrate the fact that this person is someone who's been close with Kurvitz for many many years and that made his criticisms of him hit even harder. That happy nostalgia devolving into something a lot more bittersweet during the interview, culminating in him describing the situation as "f*cking horrible" was almost painful to watch.
Pfft, someone is an extrovert surrounded by introverts and suddenly they are a cult leader??? I am sorry, but I was in a cult during my childhood and it annoys me so much when people use the term so loosely to apply to anything that gives them a bad feeling. Takes away from the severity of it imo.
It is true that Argo didn't use the exact words "cult leader personality", I should've looked up his exact wording on this. Here are the exact quotes he said though:
"To me he was a god, like I was very, very young, very influenceable and I sort of admired him to a degree where my own personality was eaten up in this..."
"This leader-follower relationship I [had] with Robert, it [wasn't] healthy."
"I've sensed that I'm slipping back into this follower mode."
I think based on this it's understandable why I used "deified leader" with "cult leader" interchangeably, especially since I forgot the exact wording of it. I also think there's a bit more to Kurvitz than just being an "extrovert surrounded by introverts" at least based on what Argo said and we shouldn't minimise the severity of that situation either. I do agree that "cult leader" was not the perfect wording though and I should've just rewatched that part to see what Argo said exactly.
That's exactly what I noticed as well, and the fact that Rostov demanded another interview after the one he had made with Kurvitz kind of proved that point even more.
@@Moonchild15225no one cares what you think
"Rostov silently nodding along to everything Kurvitz said was a bit of a red flag"
Nodding is a sign to show you agree
I understand where this comes from and I also saw that but that's nowhere near a red flag, Robert is just used to do the talking. At worst it could show a bit of a dominance but not as far as a red flag.
This is totally a capitalism sucks situation. Those financiers jumping in to snatch up the profits, and bilking the creatives.
I stand with the workers, but those workers are also afraid of saying anything negative about ZAUM lest they be fired like Kurvitz was.
I think he was perfectly logical to not wade into addressing the personal grievances in his apology because what, it’s just going to be more fodder for a media circus.
I don’t think Kurvitz is faultless, but I highly doubt anything he did was nearly as illegal as the fishy dealings of those millionaires. They are gonna cut and run whenever they suck this pig dry, they always do.
Have ye heard the news? Ooh boy, those are not disco
Jamrock Hobo agrees with you.
This whole video is literally just feels like corporate bootlicking.
Did you even watch it
My perspective on the situation is that the transactions are highly suspicious and indicative of several potential criminal acts.
On the subject of the workplace I think that the core creative clique were all subjected to an unreasonable workload and were not able to transition well from their previous mode of work, which was much more informal and not beholden to external deadlines and also didn't involve the same skills as the management roles that they were placed in.
The workers are kind of caught in a rough position, both experiencing a lack of communication from Robert and his co-founders and often receiving incredibly harsh feedback for their contributions.
When the founders got burnt out and reduced their hours the same concessions were not made for the team as a whole and this bred resentment and antipathy between them.
The lack of a solid foundation for the next project, as the creative process was taking a significant amount of time and the creative leads were burnt out, placed the future job security of the employees in jeopardy because the company was not initiating new projects, instead placing all resources into Disco Elysium's Directors Cut and porting the game to other platforms in house.
Honestly it's a bit weird that the company has just been locking staff into continuing to work on the one thing instead of taking internal pitches for new projects outside of DE whilst the shareholders involved in the formation of the company put together new material for pre-production of a sequel.
The whole thing about Rob not being permitted to participate in a meeting about the development of his passion project and getting reprimanded for speaking out of line is really telling.
Rob is clearly a perfectionist and control freak when it comes to Disco Elysium and, whilst that has clearly caused conflict, I don't see why anyone thought that it was reasonable to expect him to just let go of the project and start working on delivering a sequel right away, only this time with less creative control over the direction it would take and an implicit expectation that the work would be carried out to the same level of intensity.
There's a reason why it's exceptionally rare for a franchise to have a singular lead writer and designer throughout: it's production line art and quality creative work can't be done on command like that unless you're dealing with an exceptionally productive individual.
Putting aside the embezzlement I don't see why ZA/UM wouldn't have given the staff as a whole the opportunity to prototype some original ideas for smaller games to permit for a sequel to Disco Elysium to come about more naturally.
It's just ridiculous to try and keep a company afloat like this (though I imagine that the legal proceedings do tie their hands somewhat) and I honestly think that the tension could have been brought down a notch if they just let Rob and the other founders who directly worked on Disco Elysium keep stewardship of any Elysium-derived concepts and broadened out the company's portfolio to give the talented writers, programmers and artists that demonstrated their ability working on the game something worthwhile to do while allowing for a potential follow up to come about in its own time, or possibly not at all.
I don't think there was a single criminal act in any of the transactions. They do seem shady, but I doubt any laws were directly broken. I've seen other deals where a nominal fee was paid for something of value simply to transfer ownership and the wife-as-a-swiss-bank-account trick was already used in Shawshank Redemption lol. All of this was only brought up because Robert got fired. It's not like he was anywhere near a majority shareholder before any of this happened. He's just muddying the waters and dragging all these other workers down with him.
@@snowballeffect7812buying an IP from a company for 1 euro and selling it back to the same company for 5 millon. If that is not illegal it should be.
@@monnd It's not illegal, it's capitalism
@@jlhn so what you're saying is capitalism should be illegal? : p
About modes of work, that message saying "no one wants old ZAUM back" had me thinking the person writing and the person writing and the person reading might have a different view of what "old ZAUM" even meant. Like, it must suck to hear "yeah, no, your old cultural collective sucked and needs to become a professional corporation" and know in a sense you sold that.
To me it would have been useful if, in the recap of the interviews, the same drawn pictures of the people involved were shown. It's a very complicated story with many complex characters. Showing a constant who's who would help me keep up with all these people.
RHETORIC [Challenging: Failure]
This is a great video, really fantastic journalism you've done here. I will say, the hurt and betrayel the other employees feel for Robert is palpable. I've been exploited both by big corporations, and small mom&pop business, and I have to say - being exploited by someone you see everyday is so much worse. It hurts so bad. You trust them and you get shanked. With corporations you expect that, but not from your 'friend'.
I can also completely understand Robert, Rotsev and Helen feeling the same way towards Illmar.