I still prefer the shots from Huawei Mate 50 pro. Considering the fact that the latest Flagships of vivo and xiaomi are equipped with larger camera sensor than the one with Mate 50 Pro, but mate 50 pro managed to compete with this latest hardware. Another one, I have viewed the detailed review of DXOMark where the Mate 50 pro is enjoying the top spot and indeed that this phone brings new era in mobile photography as it follows the steps of its predecessors in mate series and p series. Come to think of this... What if there is no US ban made against Huawei and what if Huawei will continue to manufacture its own Kirin chipset and have that latest and larger camera sensor in its latest Flagship Phone? Imagine how far this company can go. However, I really admire how persistent this company and they manage to innovate using the only available resources they have. Kudos to Huawei! ✨💪 Still the king in mobile photography. 👑😎
@@vladimirkraus1438 i think default mode is okay and not much different, default mode is just more eye catching imo, not too overprocessing or oversaturated, but u can turn it on for like captured natural landscapes where you want it to be as natural
@@Havsue there is a big difference between these modes! Zeiss natural colour gives you a natural looking photo with perfect white balance, contrast and colour saturation in 9 out of 10 times. No other phone can do that. In default contrast is clearly higher and overall the pictures get to warm in most photos
It's actually the opposite there is no phone which makes more natural looking photos than Vivo X90 Pro+. Due to the superior hardware of the X90 Pro+ compared to every other phone the software doesn't need to process the photos that much and you can see that. You get more details than with other phones without over sharpening
@@flo_h_96 I would disagree with "perfect" white balance, quite often it is off. Especially when a part of the photo is lit with sunshine and other part is in shade. Then the part in shade gets a bit blue. Which is not real. Not even in Zeiss mode.
No one is talking about Huawei's portrait mode especially at 5:51. If you look closely on the background blur, it has that natural "bokeh balls" effect, where highlights are spread out instead of averaging them out. If you have mirrorless or DSLR, you know what I mean. 😏
That was great! Each brand has really done well. I really would have thought that the variable aperture on the mate 50 pro would have gave it and advantage in low light photos and videos. And Vivo's Zoom prowess without a periscope is really surprising. When it's gardening /drinking season, macrophotography is my thing. All those flowers veggies and little bugs. So I would most likely want the Mate 50 Pro. ✌️🌻
just do the social media camera blind test. in your own scoring and opinion huawei always loses. it's more reliable if we see results from combined opinion from other people. just do the poll.
Great comparison! Huawei must have a crazy warm tone as nearly all pictures are clearly warmer than the pictures of the other two and that although Zeiss natural colour was off in the Vivo which means the Vivo pictures already are warmer than they should be to keep it natural! Other than the Huawei does a good job considering that the hardware isn't as good as on the other two! Xiaomis white balance is so much of sometimes that it would disqualify for me! If I need to edit a big amount of photos afterwards because it looks so strange than what's the purpose on using a phone? Then I can use a mirrorless camera as well. Vivo has a great edge detection for human subjects in portrait mode but they need to sort out the errors it had with not blurring the the background consistently! The fact that you can adjust the amount of background blur in portrait mode on the Vivo and the fact the background blur looks very natural makes it better than Huawei for me, which might have a stronger blur sometimes, but for me it's a bit overdone. Also reproducing the right skin tone Vivo would beat Huawei if Zeiss natural colour would be on. Xiaomi 12s Ultra in general has a very bad software and that won't change anymore as the 13 Pro is already out in china and soon in Europe! Huawei did a extraordinary job in improving their camera by software updates compared to when it got released because back then it was horrible and now it's one of the best! Still Vivo X90 Pro+ has by far the best and most consistent camera system and that right from the launch. There is good chance that the few very little problems will get solved with software updates and therefore extends it's lead over the other phones
I hate that you use the not so accurate modes, why even make comparisons? The AI processed images doesn't look good on either of them. The accurate modes on the cameras will show which one of the are the most true to life and accurate! To use the cameras overly processed "social media" modes are a waste of time.
I don't agree with the comparison, how can you guys give points to overprocessed photos? And why did the Vivo 90pro plus won the zoom categories? The xiaomi 12s ultra did a nice job with natural photos.
People need to stop taking human portrait shots on wide lenses. 27mm destroys faces with all the distortion it brings. The vivo is great for portraits because it has both a 2x and a 3.5x telephoto, both being relatively large sensors. Use them.
Thanks a lot for this comparison! I was impressed by image zoom comparison. I believe that you could add to this section the comparison of the images taken by every gadget in “standard” and “full” sensor resolutions to find out if massively advertised 50/108/200 Mp sensors do their job as we expect them to do. I tried this with Xiaomi 12T in the shop and found the difference between standard and hi-res images be almost invisible. Remove post-processing, and the answer is - binning! They just cheat us! 50 Mp is really 12.5 Mp with 4 pixels binned under 1 color filter! Here you can say: “Hey, guy, Xiaomi 12T has 108 Mp main sensor!” Right. But in reality it is the same 12 Mp sensor with 9 physical pixels binned under each of 3 color filters! That is why you see no difference in sharpness/details between 12 Mp (standard or default resolution) image and the one taken in “full” resolution scaled to the same size of any detail in the frame. This is Marketing, son! So, the tech goes more complicated, it gives us no real advantage in image quality, it requires more processing, including processing time, processors capacity, energy... Shall I mention that it is more expensive? And shall I ask you who pays for this?
Fantastic comparison! These are the three phones (with the possible addition of one of the Sonys) that I'm deciding beween. I was going to go with the Xiaomi until I saw this video. Question, though: If one were only shooting RAW for the photos, which would havet he best output? Would it change your scores at all? I typically only shoot RAW for images which are really going to matter. Thanks!
As an average guy who loved taking portrait photo of my family using galaxy z flip 4, I can fairly say having to own another phone xiaomi 12s ultra IS THE WORST EVER compared to my lower end hardware galaxy z flip 4. Xiaomi's post processing of portrait shots are horrible.
6:15 bro your face is not distorted on vivo, is the most accurate because is using the 2x optical while the others are digital zooming, everyone knows that 2x is more true to shape
Goddamn, that 12S Ultra is so pretty. Anyway, not a fan of what Huawei does with their image computing. It yellows out things way too much for my taste.
I have a vivox80pro and i absolutely love it. I wish I could use the 5G in the states 🥹but of course the states like to be diff than the rest of the world.
yeah, the longer i look at the review, the more i see, you give points on color and contrast a lot, phones should be set on standard for this one, sorry :/
I'm thinking about getting the vivo depending on how good the s23 will be but the thing is Vivo doesn't have a global version....if I import it from China will everything be ok? will anything be affected compared to if there was a global version?
i got it from china and is all fine, i heard android auto isnt working but i don't use so don't care. There is some chinese bloatware but can be removed and i think overall origin os is better than funtouch, samsung has no chance against this beast, samsung can't even get its face unlock and smart stay to work properly
@@adyady3099 Nice but I'll still wait and see how good the s23 will be it might surprise us and if you don't mind can you tell me what website you used to order from China and do they ship globally ?
@@Blank_e2v s23 ultra wont stand a chance against's vivo 1 inch sensor and the other sensors will remain the same. My wife has s22 ultra and vivo beats it even at zoom. and s23 ultra is rumored to cost 1400 euro comparing to 1000 euro of vivo i ordered it from TradingShenzhen , im from europe and funny enough i paid for 256gb version and they sent the 512 one
Thanks for the review. Nice job done here, but the point system is not representive. For example Xiaomi takes second place and Huawei takes third place but Xiaomi fucks up the most important features. Colors in Portrait, colors of human subjects and main camera was all over the place. If people look pale like zombies or the image is too dark, who gives a shit about the slow motion that gave those extra 3 points? White balance, exposure, details and colors are way more important. And Huawei is by far better than Xiaomi.
1:10 - the trees behind on the Huawei are blurred artificially. Look at the innerside of the right tree trunk. It's blurry but should be pin sharp. Slight edge detection error. It also forgot to blur the branches on the far left in the picture which are at the same distance as the blurred part
use zeiss mode & leica natural. these comparisons not utilizing elements that makes these phones stand out are getting tiresome. I understand why you do em like this but it's a waste imo.
I don't know if it's just me but look at 13:28 he said that Huawei is better at that pic but to me the exposure is off for me by just looking at the side of the face of the subject ... It is overexposed.
I thought the Huawei mate 50 pro was above other devices as far as photography is concerned. Now I see, although I would still like to test directly, that it is no longer quite as it was a few years ago when Huawei dominated the market.
This does not mean that it is bad, it just means that other devices have arrived their progress. As far as night photography is concerned still it's ahead.
Remind you that mate 50 pro has the smaleest main sensor among all flagship but still give best result most of them, wait for p60 pro with 1 inch main camera, variable aperture, and ryyb arrays
@@kevinpaundra7554 backward technology due to US Sanctions and still able to produce such high level of smartphone photography, its not that other device have arrived their progress, its show how good a company under pressure still able to fight those top tech brand with latest sensors etc.
in all respect but you are not even near a professional recap of these pictures. giving point to horrible pictures, forgetting about dynamic range and color and iso noise, xiaomi distorted your face so much in many pictures. you should consider let a photographer judge your pictures or even a semi prof photographer, that really is horrible scoring. nice video and content but bad verdicts grüße aus berlin
Xiaomi got last place in photos taken with the main camera, as well as Portrait mode - so we're not sure why you mentioned that Xiaomi didn't do a good job when we have the same opinion. They also barely got second place in ultrawide, only because Huawei underperformed there.
Im excited for the huawei p60 pro can do if it will release in march because we have chip war going on as of now so hopefully it will be ok..nice comparison as always
I still prefer the shots from Huawei Mate 50 pro. Considering the fact that the latest Flagships of vivo and xiaomi are equipped with larger camera sensor than the one with Mate 50 Pro, but mate 50 pro managed to compete with this latest hardware. Another one, I have viewed the detailed review of DXOMark where the Mate 50 pro is enjoying the top spot and indeed that this phone brings new era in mobile photography as it follows the steps of its predecessors in mate series and p series.
Come to think of this... What if there is no US ban made against Huawei and what if Huawei will continue to manufacture its own Kirin chipset and have that latest and larger camera sensor in its latest Flagship Phone? Imagine how far this company can go. However, I really admire how persistent this company and they manage to innovate using the only available resources they have. Kudos to Huawei! ✨💪 Still the king in mobile photography. 👑😎
but Vivo is still the best... Huawei is sagging behind tech wise tbh
The Vivo X90 Pro + gives the best result! It just looks overprocessed everytime and doesn't look natural
You need to switch ON the Zeiss natural mode. In this test, the mode was OFF. Everything will look very natural with Zeiss.
@@vladimirkraus1438 i think default mode is okay and not much different, default mode is just more eye catching imo, not too overprocessing or oversaturated, but u can turn it on for like captured natural landscapes where you want it to be as natural
@@Havsue there is a big difference between these modes! Zeiss natural colour gives you a natural looking photo with perfect white balance, contrast and colour saturation in 9 out of 10 times. No other phone can do that. In default contrast is clearly higher and overall the pictures get to warm in most photos
It's actually the opposite there is no phone which makes more natural looking photos than Vivo X90 Pro+. Due to the superior hardware of the X90 Pro+ compared to every other phone the software doesn't need to process the photos that much and you can see that. You get more details than with other phones without over sharpening
@@flo_h_96 I would disagree with "perfect" white balance, quite often it is off. Especially when a part of the photo is lit with sunshine and other part is in shade. Then the part in shade gets a bit blue. Which is not real. Not even in Zeiss mode.
Great comparison. Completely to the point & precise. Loved it. No Complains this time. Well done 👍
No one is talking about Huawei's portrait mode especially at 5:51. If you look closely on the background blur, it has that natural "bokeh balls" effect, where highlights are spread out instead of averaging them out. If you have mirrorless or DSLR, you know what I mean. 😏
That was great!
Each brand has really done well.
I really would have thought that the variable aperture on the mate 50 pro would have gave it and advantage in low light photos and videos.
And Vivo's Zoom prowess without a periscope is really surprising.
When it's gardening /drinking season, macrophotography is my thing. All those flowers veggies and little bugs.
So I would most likely want the Mate 50 Pro.
✌️🌻
I really liked the images of the X90 Pro Plus, I like photos with natural colors and more faithful to the environment
I love your judgement for the very first time. This is great. It seems Leica and Kirin are affecting Huawei greatly. Thank you, Versus.
Thanks for watching!
the MATE 50 PRO photos are the best between the three of them
easy no
just do the social media camera blind test. in your own scoring and opinion huawei always loses. it's more reliable if we see results from combined opinion from other people. just do the poll.
Great comparison! Huawei must have a crazy warm tone as nearly all pictures are clearly warmer than the pictures of the other two and that although Zeiss natural colour was off in the Vivo which means the Vivo pictures already are warmer than they should be to keep it natural! Other than the Huawei does a good job considering that the hardware isn't as good as on the other two! Xiaomis white balance is so much of sometimes that it would disqualify for me! If I need to edit a big amount of photos afterwards because it looks so strange than what's the purpose on using a phone? Then I can use a mirrorless camera as well. Vivo has a great edge detection for human subjects in portrait mode but they need to sort out the errors it had with not blurring the the background consistently! The fact that you can adjust the amount of background blur in portrait mode on the Vivo and the fact the background blur looks very natural makes it better than Huawei for me, which might have a stronger blur sometimes, but for me it's a bit overdone. Also reproducing the right skin tone Vivo would beat Huawei if Zeiss natural colour would be on. Xiaomi 12s Ultra in general has a very bad software and that won't change anymore as the 13 Pro is already out in china and soon in Europe! Huawei did a extraordinary job in improving their camera by software updates compared to when it got released because back then it was horrible and now it's one of the best! Still Vivo X90 Pro+ has by far the best and most consistent camera system and that right from the launch. There is good chance that the few very little problems will get solved with software updates and therefore extends it's lead over the other phones
Thanks for your comment!
my personal opinion:
Really can't undersrand you choices sometimes. The 12S Ultra was often better than you had chosen.
I hate that you use the not so accurate modes, why even make comparisons? The AI processed images doesn't look good on either of them. The accurate modes on the cameras will show which one of the are the most true to life and accurate!
To use the cameras overly processed "social media" modes are a waste of time.
انت افضل قناة تقوم بمقارنات الكمرات في الجوالات و بشكل إحترافي
you are best channel make comparison between camera of mobile
Xiaomi 13 Ultra is just around the corner, makes me excited
Also P60 pro/ultra and Mate 60 pro at the corner
@@lovric600 iPhone 20 (2028) will be even better
I don't agree with the comparison, how can you guys give points to overprocessed photos? And why did the Vivo 90pro plus won the zoom categories? The xiaomi 12s ultra did a nice job with natural photos.
People need to stop taking human portrait shots on wide lenses. 27mm destroys faces with all the distortion it brings. The vivo is great for portraits because it has both a 2x and a 3.5x telephoto, both being relatively large sensors. Use them.
Good job guy... excellent vídeo!!! X90 pro plus winner...
Thanks for vedio can you make a comparition between x80 pro and x90 pro plus
Vivo x90 pro plus for me
Watching on my X90 pro plus😎
Great video because ever number show point device and all everything else
all 3 are great. can you compare x90pro vs x90pro+ ? I am very interested in their small difference
Thanks a lot for this comparison! I was impressed by image zoom comparison. I believe that you could add to this section the comparison of the images taken by every gadget in “standard” and “full” sensor resolutions to find out if massively advertised 50/108/200 Mp sensors do their job as we expect them to do. I tried this with Xiaomi 12T in the shop and found the difference between standard and hi-res images be almost invisible. Remove post-processing, and the answer is - binning! They just cheat us! 50 Mp is really 12.5 Mp with 4 pixels binned under 1 color filter! Here you can say: “Hey, guy, Xiaomi 12T has 108 Mp main sensor!” Right. But in reality it is the same 12 Mp sensor with 9 physical pixels binned under each of 3 color filters! That is why you see no difference in sharpness/details between 12 Mp (standard or default resolution) image and the one taken in “full” resolution scaled to the same size of any detail in the frame. This is Marketing, son! So, the tech goes more complicated, it gives us no real advantage in image quality, it requires more processing, including processing time, processors capacity, energy... Shall I mention that it is more expensive? And shall I ask you who pays for this?
As usual, another great, detailed, high quality versus review ! Congratulations for your amazing work !
Thank you very much!
@@versus_com lgbt?
that comparison is pretty good
Fantastic comparison! These are the three phones (with the possible addition of one of the Sonys) that I'm deciding beween. I was going to go with the Xiaomi until I saw this video. Question, though: If one were only shooting RAW for the photos, which would havet he best output? Would it change your scores at all? I typically only shoot RAW for images which are really going to matter. Thanks!
As an average guy who loved taking portrait photo of my family using galaxy z flip 4, I can fairly say having to own another phone xiaomi 12s ultra IS THE WORST EVER compared to my lower end hardware galaxy z flip 4. Xiaomi's post processing of portrait shots are horrible.
We weren't the biggest fans of the color accuracy either.
I like seeing life in the background also x90 beautiful.
Very transparent comparison.
Thanks a lot.👍
6:15 bro your face is not distorted on vivo, is the most accurate because is using the 2x optical while the others are digital zooming, everyone knows that 2x is more true to shape
Great work as always!!
Wow! New video already!? That’s great :)
Hope you enjoyed it!
@@versus_com I did :)
Congratulations, it's a great video. even incredible
Nice and details video ....pls keep it up.
As Always Great Job
Mate 50!pro
Great work!
Thank you! Cheers!
Grt video bro thnx all phones are gd bt I choose Huawei
Great 👍
Goddamn, that 12S Ultra is so pretty.
Anyway, not a fan of what Huawei does with their image computing. It yellows out things way too much for my taste.
I have a vivox80pro and i absolutely love it. I wish I could use the 5G in the states 🥹but of course the states like to be diff than the rest of the world.
Fantastic as always, well done, appreciated content 👏👏👏
nice review, but mistake from beginning on xiaomi, you set it on vibrant, instead on standard, result, to much contrast, too punchy colors etc...
yeah, the longer i look at the review, the more i see, you give points on color and contrast a lot, phones should be set on standard for this one, sorry :/
We used the other mode before in comparisons, and it also looks too bland. Xiaomi needs to find a balance between the two.
I'm thinking about getting the vivo depending on how good the s23 will be but the thing is Vivo doesn't have a global version....if I import it from China will everything be ok? will anything be affected compared to if there was a global version?
i got it from china and is all fine, i heard android auto isnt working but i don't use so don't care. There is some chinese bloatware but can be removed and i think overall origin os is better than funtouch, samsung has no chance against this beast, samsung can't even get its face unlock and smart stay to work properly
@@adyady3099 Nice but I'll still wait and see how good the s23 will be it might surprise us and if you don't mind can you tell me what website you used to order from China and do they ship globally ?
@@Blank_e2v s23 ultra wont stand a chance against's vivo 1 inch sensor and the other sensors will remain the same. My wife has s22 ultra and vivo beats it even at zoom.
and s23 ultra is rumored to cost 1400 euro comparing to 1000 euro of vivo
i ordered it from TradingShenzhen , im from europe and funny enough i paid for 256gb version and they sent the 512 one
mate 50 pro has better details at night than the other tho even with a smaller sensor, just look at the street details, how is that possibile???wow
Actualizaste la camara del Xiaomi? Actualmente vamos en la versión 4.5.001960.1
Thanks for the review. Nice job done here, but the point system is not representive. For example Xiaomi takes second place and Huawei takes third place but Xiaomi fucks up the most important features. Colors in Portrait, colors of human subjects and main camera was all over the place. If people look pale like zombies or the image is too dark, who gives a shit about the slow motion that gave those extra 3 points?
White balance, exposure, details and colors are way more important. And Huawei is by far better than Xiaomi.
Huawei Huawei and Always Huawei 💪💪
u could've used leica authentic mode on xiaomi
it gives better results
and Zeiss mode on vivo
and xmage on Huawei
I'm eager to see how Xioami 13 pro catch up against Vivo this time
Vivo😍😍😍😍
Mate 50 pro will always be the king of photography hands down
1:10 - the trees behind on the Huawei are blurred artificially. Look at the innerside of the right tree trunk. It's blurry but should be pin sharp. Slight edge detection error. It also forgot to blur the branches on the far left in the picture which are at the same distance as the blurred part
Danke Jungs, sehr hilfreich.
Gerne!
Back case all pletier must be a monster gamer....
Vivo is the best camera
Dope bruh 😎
use zeiss mode & leica natural.
these comparisons not utilizing elements that makes these phones stand out are getting tiresome.
I understand why you do em like this but it's a waste imo.
Love all three phones ❤️
u guys should doing blind test
please mate 50 pro vs s23 ultra camera comparision
superb comparison....👌👌👌
Add some portraits/ cinematic videos 😊😀😀in upcoming videos If you don't mind.
The only issue I have with my Vivo is the heating, hope they can fix with software updates
Mediatek Dimensity or Qualcomm OS?
Myself I have the Qualcomm I don't have any problems didn't heat at least once :)
@@jefffinity0323 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 bro,
@@jefffinity0323 x90 Pro Plus
So it means it is not because either Mediatek or Qualcomm..it is about the device itself about heating issue..Thanks
thanks a ton
Most welcome!
Me with an Huawei P40 Pro Plus
I respect your comparaison but the mate 50 pro all the way better
I don't know if it's just me but look at 13:28 he said that Huawei is better at that pic but to me the exposure is off for me by just looking at the side of the face of the subject ... It is overexposed.
Great comparison but wish it has panoramic Pic compare. Thanks
Thanks for watching!
I thought the Huawei mate 50 pro was above other devices as far as photography is concerned. Now I see, although I would still like to test directly, that it is no longer quite as it was a few years ago when Huawei dominated the market.
This does not mean that it is bad, it just means that other devices have arrived their progress. As far as night photography is concerned still it's ahead.
Remind you that mate 50 pro has the smaleest main sensor among all flagship but still give best result most of them, wait for p60 pro with 1 inch main camera, variable aperture, and ryyb arrays
@@kevinpaundra7554 backward technology due to US Sanctions and still able to produce such high level of smartphone photography, its not that other device have arrived their progress, its show how good a company under pressure still able to fight those top tech brand with latest sensors etc.
@@kevinpaundra7554 huawei with 1 inch RYYB would be the end of all phone cameras but won't happen anytime soon
Xiamoi 12 S Ulta Good Camara😍❤️❤️❤️❤️&Vdo
in all respect but you are not even near a professional recap of these pictures. giving point to horrible pictures, forgetting about dynamic range and color and iso noise, xiaomi distorted your face so much in many pictures. you should consider let a photographer judge your pictures or even a semi prof photographer, that really is horrible scoring. nice video and content but bad verdicts
grüße aus berlin
Xiaomi got last place in photos taken with the main camera, as well as Portrait mode - so we're not sure why you mentioned that Xiaomi didn't do a good job when we have the same opinion. They also barely got second place in ultrawide, only because Huawei underperformed there.
I like Huawei
Like it
I think Huawei mate 50pro need some updates. #China
10:26 your 🚶 was 🔥 😍
xiaomi camera is fixing face distortion. except xiaomi, ur face looks chubby. 5:45, 6:03, 7:07
Nice bro
Awesome
Huawei used to be the number chinses brand phone who battles on iphone and samsung
Huawei is the king of pictures watch out for exmage soon
HUAWEI Camera is the best
mate 50 pro is really better
Im excited for the huawei p60 pro can do if it will release in march because we have chip war going on as of now so hopefully it will be ok..nice comparison as always
Huawei is really awesome..
still waiting oppo find x6 pro
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
S22 U😕
It is in our previous video!
👍👍👍👍👍
Enemy of Huawei!
😘😘😯😯
Как всегда победил сяоми)
🥰🥰🥰🥰
xiaomi 13 Pro world best camera 100%
☃️
Mate 40 pro better. Huawei is lost without kirin.
My iPhone 13 Pro max beats them lol😮
Vivo X90+ is the best.
All Xiaomi phone is worst in every aspect.