If Ubi's cut is not absolutely outrageous then it will soon be used exactly for that. Considering that this mobile game is not on mobiles then it will be used only for that.
Ubi have a nack for seeing something relatively successful and then trying to copy it but not understanding what made it successful and then because they don't understand it it gets released 3 or 4 years after the hype for that thing has died down and nobody cares. And is a substandard version of that specific thing. But they blame we gamers for expecting massive quality.
Steal? The outrage over this is absurd and irrational. They're just selling a thing. You can choose to buy or not buy that thing. Nobody has a gun to their head.
As long as Ubisoft owns AC, they'll never die. I'm sorry but no matter how much you cry, Ubisoft holds one of the top 5 most profitable video game IPs in the world, next to GTA, Minecraft and Pokemon.
@@GameoftheYear-fx4mq"no matter how much you cry" I don't think anyone was crying except for you bringing it up dude, might be projecting with this one.
@@GameoftheYear-fx4mq AC has fallen off with every new game they bring out. Eventually it will catch up to the company. Investors wont be too happy that every other game flops.
@@Frenchy_47 You say AC fell off like it's not constantly breaking sales records 😭 just because you don't like AC anymore doesn't mean it's not Uber popular
Just like there's a hidden political power that controls the world, so is one for the video game industry. Most likely EA forced Ubisoft to do this as punishment.
Funny enough words come out one dude has basically stopped the game dead cuz he's found a way to both auto-match with everyone and auto-WIN every match. The devs tried to ban him but apparently there's still reports that he can still battle other people and still auto-win. It's been out a WEEK!
Honestly, such style of game looks kinda interesting to me. I mean, if it was normal game, like Darkest Dungeon or something. I get the appeal of game style, but buying selling these things for thousands of dollars is what makes this stupid.
@@TheRealUcanUwill If it actually had unique characters and hero figures to collect (sort of like gwent) I could see it being an interesting idea for a game. Obviously without the nft garbage. But the game just looks so bland and generic. All the figures look very similar with just a few head/armor/weapon options. And the combat practically plays itself. The idea I could see it working. But it would need major revisions to the gameplay, rules, and figure lineup.
As mentioned they're *trying* for a Darkest dungeon style which as it's attacks animated usually as a single frame. Even the music sounds very Darkest Dungeonesque...but the miniatures look like something you'd make in Heroforge (which considering they're all just made up of assets, I wouldn't be surprised if some of them *were* directly lifted from Heroforge) and completely lack the artstyle of the DD games...
@@luketfer Personally, they failed to add their own spin. Imagine if it was more photo realistic lighting so the smash bros trophiness was less compared, but the animations more viseral. It looks like another fortnite child design. Child-grim. It adds a fake mess I hate.
The Division (2, especially) and GR Breakpoint (after it was overhauled) are very good games that don't really have any equivalent on console, so no, it's not best for them to fade away - they just need to get their shit together. Will that happen with ultra-capitalist asshats in charge? Doubtful... but they have too many good IPs to just let them all rot.
Remember wen they said, if u buy an nft from one game, it will be available in all games, even from other developers! Can u imagine how hard that would be to implement? Nft's were a pisstake from the start!
The worst part was that in theory it seemed like a cool idea if it actually worked like how they said and there was some sort of cap so a picture of an ape doesn’t cost as much as a house, but we all know it was never gonna work with the technology we have now, or if it will even ever be possible like how they said.
The funny thing is, Epic is moving in that direction with their Fortnite setup. So the idea is very much alive. Expecting to not have an "Oasis" from Ready Player One, seems silly to me. We are not restricted by technology at this point, it's all down to business rules.
Why would players want to watch digital representations of little figurines bonking, the whole point of, you know, computer games, is that you can animate figures... so boring.
In this case it's because they are all made up of interchangeable parts it's probably too annoying to animate them all. but they should have spent the time, it worked in Spore and I'm pretty sure UE5 has a procedural animation thing.
@@emikochan13 can’t they just animate like a template and then put it on the figures based on their size? I’ve seen stuff like it in Halo for example, the re used all the exact same AR animations for the Battle rifle in 3, obviously it’s different than animating figures but it seems like they could have done SOMETHING with the animation lol
@@Caspeaon if they wanted to they could have for sure, they chose this. It was cool in darkest dungeon cause it allowed a small team to make something really special. Ubisoft have the money to make it look really good at least. (also darkest dungeon 2 is fully animated :P)
@@emikochan13 yeah that’s why it’s so confusing to me lol. There’s no way they thought it would look better without animation, why choose to make your game look actively worse ESPECIALLY when you have the money and the devs to do it like you said. Ubisoft is the strangest most out of touch game company maybe on the planet lmao
I have a feeling it will be both successful and an absolute failure. Success because a few people are going to pour a ton a money into it, but a failure because Ubisoft didn't make billions off of it.
@@TevyaSmolka Oh I agree with you. This slop needs to go away as fast as possible. The poor suckers that spend thousands of dollars on this just for the game to close in a year or so.
Like every Ubi game now. Massive open worlds with not a whole lot inbetween and a shit load of microtransactions. It's the Ubi formula they just added the maximum monetization they could. But it's Ubi apart from the recent controversy with Shadows this, like all other Ubisoft controversies, will disappear and not hit mainstream gaming or even pierce the bubble of gaming.
I love how this years games have all been just stuff that was put into production in 2016 when identity politics and internet financial scams were big. This looks like a bad version of Darkest dungeon even down to the art style of the knight.
I pity them. ..So this is like chasing the live service trend. Putting out a game when the trend is already gone.. nft hype died few years ago. And here comes Ubi. At this point its like kicking em when they already down. Such a sad display and they did it all to themselves. Cant feel sorry for them..
Not only do they rip off an older game (Darkest Dungeon) but they stack NFTs on top of it, I get that games take a while to develop but this is an amazing example of being "late to the party".
Money. But I have never met a person who’s purchased an NFT unironically so it can’t be the profitable, there must be just a couple whales that buy them all.
Hello Luke. NFTs were free. The prices you see are from the Secondary marketplace. So anybody can set any price they want. It is the same thing as saying "OMG look ! Square Enix is trying to sell a copy of FF7 at 5 million dollars on Craigslist ! " Following multiple articles that wrote "Ubisoft are selling their NFTs for $63k" we the players had a little fun session of listing our NFTs for insane prices to see what new articles/videos would share it.
Don't let the old perception of NFTs as a trend or scam cloud the potential they bring. NFTs offer a legitimate way to own, trade, and retain value in digital assets. Are many of these used in pay-to-win games? Sure-but think about it: most of us have likely spent money on pay-to-win games only to lose everything if the game shuts down or moves on. NFTs introduce the concept of real ownership. When games allow players to own what they buy, it’s an evolution of the classic pay-to-win model. Companies are experimenting with different approaches: Ubisoft with its new game, Epic with The Machines Arena, and more. This tech could become mainstream sooner than many expect. Just consider the upside-there’s a lot of potential here!
'A fool and his money, are soon parted' 😂 seriously though, looks trash very dull.. theres more dynamic turn based battles in Honkai Star Rail, on my phone!
they probably planned this during the 2021 nft boom they were too slow lol could've made those prices realistic if they pulled it off in 2021 these crypto bros throw money so easily
@@ggwagmi1236 even worst, waiting 3 years to release it is just…. I have this theory, on god, there is someone doing it on purpose to ruin the company cause this is not normal
Banana game holds strong on steam against all ods. Unless several people run all the bots, it is only a matter of time before someone tap into "artificial economy" idea again. At the end of a day it is not about what you like but about what you would pay for. Attach it to something players would love and you turn "primodial evil" into dilema. The only suprising thing is that no one bothered to cover nft stuff and even ign calls it out, Ubi situation is not lively enough it seems.
Can’t wait to play Heroes Strategies: Stories of Astoria. While I’ve never played a game like Protagonists Gameplans: Tales of Denuvio, I’m sure it contains gameplay and things to do. Surely one of the games of the year!
So its just super auto pets but it costs money to get the units? also one match takes way too long considering you basically just mashed buttons and won
Are csgo skins not nfts then? I feel like if a game sets up the nfts just like the steam csgo system i think this could work and not really be a big problem
When nftbros actually kind of existed….3-4 years ago… i feel like they would have loved this. An actually decent graphics game from a famous publisher. They could have made a good amount of money off it. Not now. Now they blow up their company and don’t even make a profit
Exos Heroes was a very impressive looking (for its time) Mobile Gacha game which then shut down and the company bastardized it into an NFT battle game (Desperado B218) just like this (horribly money-hungry company who took P2W to the extreme which killed the game). Makes for a MUCH more impressive looking game than this, which looks like a mobile game from 2005. Eventually they "paused" the NFT aspects of the game and started porting the original RPG content back into the game again... but the hope was people would spend time playing the game, gacha for new characters, level them up, then port them into the NFT battle game. Good luck with that...
I made an OKX wallet and bought USDT how can I put my wallet in limercoin they gave me this seed phrase (image you tuition loan endless kit north item dice during home filter) how can I move my wallet to an exchange?
No production and marketing, only publishing it. Miniatures price set for having a laugh lol. Style is cool. Ubisoft has nothing to do with this. Let's move to better news
This game should be named Money Laundering Tactics.
Nah that would be too "on the nose" 😅
If Ubi's cut is not absolutely outrageous then it will soon be used exactly for that. Considering that this mobile game is not on mobiles then it will be used only for that.
Seems like that's exactly what this is. Everyone is cashing out before the reset.
Ubisoft: "Am I so out of touch? No. It's the consumers who are wrong."
Ubi have a nack for seeing something relatively successful and then trying to copy it but not understanding what made it successful and then because they don't understand it it gets released 3 or 4 years after the hype for that thing has died down and nobody cares. And is a substandard version of that specific thing. But they blame we gamers for expecting massive quality.
The perfect Simpsons reference for this rubbish 😂
Budget to figure out the most ways to legally steal people's money = 99.98%
Animation Budget = .02%
I think the stop motiony animations actually look very good
Steal? The outrage over this is absurd and irrational. They're just selling a thing. You can choose to buy or not buy that thing. Nobody has a gun to their head.
@@SpikedKirby
That's cause it's darkest dungeon.
Everyone was sick of NFT's 2 years ago why do company's keep thinking we want them now
I trink ubisoft is the only one
They are dumb and never learn at all even if we vote with our wallets they still think we are as dumb as them and they think we will love it
They don't. Quartz is dead. This is a project made by an another company
because they developed it back then and now they are done
Because there’s still enough idiots out there who will buy in.
295 million for an NFT!? You could buy the whole company with that amount if you wait a few months!
As long as Ubisoft owns AC, they'll never die. I'm sorry but no matter how much you cry, Ubisoft holds one of the top 5 most profitable video game IPs in the world, next to GTA, Minecraft and Pokemon.
@@GameoftheYear-fx4mq"no matter how much you cry" I don't think anyone was crying except for you bringing it up dude, might be projecting with this one.
That's just headline grabbing nonsense, it's definitely not meant to be bought lol
@@GameoftheYear-fx4mq AC has fallen off with every new game they bring out. Eventually it will catch up to the company. Investors wont be too happy that every other game flops.
@@Frenchy_47 You say AC fell off like it's not constantly breaking sales records 😭 just because you don't like AC anymore doesn't mean it's not Uber popular
Is Ubisoft intentionally trying to cause it’s own demise?
YES
Yeah. They want to take the company private and if they tank the stock on purpose it will cost them less.
@@vortex_1336yep, this stinks of investor fraud. This has to be investigated.
Yeah they're hitting gold splits currently on company collapse any%
It's honestly impressive
Just like there's a hidden political power that controls the world, so is one for the video game industry. Most likely EA forced Ubisoft to do this as punishment.
Funny enough words come out one dude has basically stopped the game dead cuz he's found a way to both auto-match with everyone and auto-WIN every match. The devs tried to ban him but apparently there's still reports that he can still battle other people and still auto-win. It's been out a WEEK!
the animation department is running the security department :P
I saw he had won over 50,000 matches 😆
@@MusingsMuses it was a networking bug, according to ubi
@@VikingGekz lol
2:20 I'm already bored
DUDE, for real
Honestly, such style of game looks kinda interesting to me. I mean, if it was normal game, like Darkest Dungeon or something. I get the appeal of game style, but buying selling these things for thousands of dollars is what makes this stupid.
@@TheRealUcanUwill If it actually had unique characters and hero figures to collect (sort of like gwent) I could see it being an interesting idea for a game. Obviously without the nft garbage. But the game just looks so bland and generic. All the figures look very similar with just a few head/armor/weapon options. And the combat practically plays itself. The idea I could see it working. But it would need major revisions to the gameplay, rules, and figure lineup.
@@johnsullivan937 Yeah, I agree, I just didn't agree that its most boring stuff ever. It would be fine Indie level game (if it wasnt blockchain game).
Fr this gameplay is TRASHHHH
"If you missed this somehow" trust me Luke, all of us will manually miss it
The little combat animations on the not actually animated "miniatures" is the weirdest design choice.
There's way better animations on phone gachas.. 😂
The animations should look like a 1000 bucks but are just lame
As mentioned they're *trying* for a Darkest dungeon style which as it's attacks animated usually as a single frame. Even the music sounds very Darkest Dungeonesque...but the miniatures look like something you'd make in Heroforge (which considering they're all just made up of assets, I wouldn't be surprised if some of them *were* directly lifted from Heroforge) and completely lack the artstyle of the DD games...
@@luketfer
Personally, they failed to add their own spin. Imagine if it was more photo realistic lighting so the smash bros trophiness was less compared, but the animations more viseral. It looks like another fortnite child design. Child-grim. It adds a fake mess I hate.
add in better animations as NFTs
This really just looks like they ripped of Darkest Dungeon 2. The art style, shading, font, skill designs, it just looks like a bootleg copy of DD2.
Honestly yes. I’ve been looking for comments like this. They even have line composition and move skills.
Dude, I thought the same exact thing the crusader is like a 1 for 1 copy.
Have you ever played the first darkest dungeon? Saying dd2 sounds like a compliment by comparison to the predicesor.
@@furyberserk Yeah I love the first game. I just referenced DD2 because it's got a 3D art style like this "game" does.
@ yes we get it the first darkest dungeon was better but the second game is what this nft trash is ripping from.
Ubisoft does not deserve your money, nor your sympathy. Ubisoft only deserves to fade into oblivion.
The Division (2, especially) and GR Breakpoint (after it was overhauled) are very good games that don't really have any equivalent on console, so no, it's not best for them to fade away - they just need to get their shit together.
Will that happen with ultra-capitalist asshats in charge? Doubtful... but they have too many good IPs to just let them all rot.
Next Ubisoft meeting: Have we tried just asking people to give us money?
Releasing a game to chase the trend that ended two years ago. This is peak modern Ubisoft lol.
Remember wen they said, if u buy an nft from one game, it will be available in all games, even from other developers!
Can u imagine how hard that would be to implement?
Nft's were a pisstake from the start!
The worst part was that in theory it seemed like a cool idea if it actually worked like how they said and there was some sort of cap so a picture of an ape doesn’t cost as much as a house, but we all know it was never gonna work with the technology we have now, or if it will even ever be possible like how they said.
The funny thing is, Epic is moving in that direction with their Fortnite setup. So the idea is very much alive. Expecting to not have an "Oasis" from Ready Player One, seems silly to me. We are not restricted by technology at this point, it's all down to business rules.
Oops, this is mine at 8:27 . I chose that price because it's the highest 32-bit integer possible :)
Why would players want to watch digital representations of little figurines bonking, the whole point of, you know, computer games, is that you can animate figures... so boring.
In this case it's because they are all made up of interchangeable parts it's probably too annoying to animate them all. but they should have spent the time, it worked in Spore and I'm pretty sure UE5 has a procedural animation thing.
@@emikochan13 can’t they just animate like a template and then put it on the figures based on their size? I’ve seen stuff like it in Halo for example, the re used all the exact same AR animations for the Battle rifle in 3, obviously it’s different than animating figures but it seems like they could have done SOMETHING with the animation lol
@@Caspeaon if they wanted to they could have for sure, they chose this. It was cool in darkest dungeon cause it allowed a small team to make something really special. Ubisoft have the money to make it look really good at least. (also darkest dungeon 2 is fully animated :P)
@@emikochan13 yeah that’s why it’s so confusing to me lol. There’s no way they thought it would look better without animation, why choose to make your game look actively worse ESPECIALLY when you have the money and the devs to do it like you said. Ubisoft is the strangest most out of touch game company maybe on the planet lmao
@@CartoonHangout im curious, did those games use elaborate 'spell' or attack animations, even if they didnt animate the figures?
Games with NFT's don't belong in gaming. End of, this needs to fail... Hard!
So it's Darkest Dungeon where they stole the homework, but changed the art style skimmed on the animations and is pay to win... got it.
Even the font is from Darkest Dungeon
@@WinterMadness My exact thoughts too
The game play is just Darkest Dungeons and the models are from Hero Forge.
facts
This nft game better flop like a brick
I have a feeling it will be both successful and an absolute failure. Success because a few people are going to pour a ton a money into it, but a failure because Ubisoft didn't make billions off of it.
@@TheBlargMargI am hoping it’s more of a failure way more than a success in my opinion but we shall see.
@@TevyaSmolka Oh I agree with you. This slop needs to go away as fast as possible. The poor suckers that spend thousands of dollars on this just for the game to close in a year or so.
whats crazy is this isnt a bad idea for a game... this looks kind of fun but the NFT and the microtransactions is what kills this game LOL
Quartz failed. Hard. This one will surely follow.
amazing that this comes right after letting off the entire Prince of Persia team
“Money Laundering Simulator” games are awesome.
Looks like mobile game slop
Can we get a new Splinter Cell.
Ubi: No hope you like this instead
@Bombardier15 can we at least get ports of Armored Core 4 and 5 (as well as their in-between squeals)? Nope!
@@TheBlargMarg That's From Software. Is it published by Ubisoft?
Like every Ubi game now. Massive open worlds with not a whole lot inbetween and a shit load of microtransactions. It's the Ubi formula they just added the maximum monetization they could. But it's Ubi apart from the recent controversy with Shadows this, like all other Ubisoft controversies, will disappear and not hit mainstream gaming or even pierce the bubble of gaming.
@@Basarius Yeah their all bloated with no substance
Thank you for suffering through this for us.
Yeah, these sorts of games are just tragic.😂
mmm yes. As terrible as we expected
Can’t wait to find out they ripped a bunch of these models from HeroForge and the impending lawsuit that ensues.
That is so stupid, I literally feel how my intelligence is going downhill
I love how this years games have all been just stuff that was put into production in 2016 when identity politics and internet financial scams were big. This looks like a bad version of Darkest dungeon even down to the art style of the knight.
300M it was not enough to make Concord! :D
Wasn’t it like 400 million? What a year of flops it’s been lmao.
"Mom, I want Darkest Dungeon!"
"No. We have Darkest Dungeon on the blockchain!"
Darkest Dungeon on the blockchain: $295m for a single NFT.
The game is so slow!!!!!!
WHERE ARE THE BLACK SAMURAIS !!!!!
I don't know the reference and still lol'd
@@SpicyMctysonit's about the new AC shadows game and it's getting old
Ubi really fucked up here. They had so many opportunities to add a dozen black lesbians but they missed their chance! Now no one will play this game
Ubisoft try not to drop their stock challenge
Difficulty: Impossible
There needs to be legal regulations to prevent this kind of nonsense.
I pity them. ..So this is like chasing the live service trend. Putting out a game when the trend is already gone.. nft hype died few years ago. And here comes Ubi. At this point its like kicking em when they already down. Such a sad display and they did it all to themselves. Cant feel sorry for them..
I personally find it hilarious they didn't even bother with voice acting. Just awkward silence in an awkward NFT game.
Not only do they rip off an older game (Darkest Dungeon) but they stack NFTs on top of it, I get that games take a while to develop but this is an amazing example of being "late to the party".
This looks boring.
This looks so boring
Barely 25 seconds in and that ubihard joke actually got me to laugh.
NFT’s are making a comeback. Get ready gamer bro/gals, the second coming is upon us
Companies treating NFTs like they're nickleback....Smh my head
Darkest dungeon : NFT edition
This disaster has been cracking me up! 😂
If they put a non-binary character in it the entire "gaming journalism" community will run defense for it...
This game is soooo boring to watch... Zero interest in playing. Why are they obsessed with NFT's...
@@edwinkaydelgado Those idiots see it as a gold mine
Money. But I have never met a person who’s purchased an NFT unironically so it can’t be the profitable, there must be just a couple whales that buy them all.
First all theres a typo and also:
Ubi didn't you already try this and learn nothing from Quartz
They didn't make this game. Just published it
@francescofioroni70 It doesn't change the fact they agreed to put their name on this
Darkest Dungeon inspired, A LOT...
Hello Luke. NFTs were free.
The prices you see are from the Secondary marketplace. So anybody can set any price they want.
It is the same thing as saying "OMG look ! Square Enix is trying to sell a copy of FF7 at 5 million dollars on Craigslist ! "
Following multiple articles that wrote "Ubisoft are selling their NFTs for $63k" we the players had a little fun session of listing our NFTs for insane prices to see what new articles/videos would share it.
I smell another Concord in the making.
The ui reminds me of darkness dungeon, and I love that game. Now, every time I play it, I'm gonna remember this dumpster fire of a game.
oof, not even 3 min in and you can see the obvious inspiration of Darkest Dungeon
This looks boring af.
People can't be that restarted to put money into this
There's a reason over 95% of NFTs are worthless today.
This is just a lesser darkest dungeon with money laundering
NFTs? I thought the corporate revolutionaries were against this stuff lol 😂
The gaming by ubi**** ! LOL. 😂
Kinda reminds me of Darkest Dungeon
Don't let the old perception of NFTs as a trend or scam cloud the potential they bring. NFTs offer a legitimate way to own, trade, and retain value in digital assets. Are many of these used in pay-to-win games? Sure-but think about it: most of us have likely spent money on pay-to-win games only to lose everything if the game shuts down or moves on. NFTs introduce the concept of real ownership. When games allow players to own what they buy, it’s an evolution of the classic pay-to-win model. Companies are experimenting with different approaches: Ubisoft with its new game, Epic with The Machines Arena, and more. This tech could become mainstream sooner than many expect.
Just consider the upside-there’s a lot of potential here!
darkest dungeons from temu
Oh not Luke biting the bait of the headline grabbing price lol
'A fool and his money, are soon parted' 😂 seriously though, looks trash very dull.. theres more dynamic turn based battles in Honkai Star Rail, on my phone!
everybody in Ybisoft must be a yes man, cause doing this in 2024 is so…. I don’t even have words fr
they probably planned this during the 2021 nft boom
they were too slow lol
could've made those prices realistic if they pulled it off in 2021
these crypto bros throw money so easily
@@ggwagmi1236 even worst, waiting 3 years to release it is just…. I have this theory, on god, there is someone doing it on purpose to ruin the company cause this is not normal
I laughed when i saw the "gameplay" 😅
When you think Ubisoft have reach the bottom of the hole, they keep digging...
"Let's copy Darkest Dungeon but make it looks like shit and put nft on it"
9:00 absolutely hilarious
I still don't get why people are so against NFT's but are fine with *literally* worthless micro-transactions.
We are against them too. Berh unleashed a pox upon the world back in 2006.
NFT’s are more harmful because of the crypto crap.
Because you can pump and dumb ubi-coin. Call it worthless, but atleast buying game assets with real money currency is "safer"
@@harya7517 how do you pump and dump micro-transactions? Oh right you can't because you're already f*****.
It's funny that the manager looks like some vampire corpo lord ready to suck your vital essences.
So it's Darkest Dungeon but with NFTs 😐
I’m glad they canned heartland instead. The world needed this
What the hell? Does Redhook have anything to say about this? This is literally just Darkest Dungeon.
Only image my brain can conjure after watching this.... heath ledger joker clapping in the cell after every movement.
Banana game holds strong on steam against all ods. Unless several people run all the bots, it is only a matter of time before someone tap into "artificial economy" idea again. At the end of a day it is not about what you like but about what you would pay for. Attach it to something players would love and you turn "primodial evil" into dilema. The only suprising thing is that no one bothered to cover nft stuff and even ign calls it out, Ubi situation is not lively enough it seems.
Wow, this game looks interesting!!!! Im going F2P hard on it and i will cook !!!!
🤣🤣🤣🤣
0:16 the most generic game name I've heard this year. Perfectly fitting for an NFT grift!
Can’t wait to play Heroes Strategies: Stories of Astoria.
While I’ve never played a game like Protagonists Gameplans: Tales of Denuvio, I’m sure it contains gameplay and things to do.
Surely one of the games of the year!
So its just super auto pets but it costs money to get the units? also one match takes way too long considering you basically just mashed buttons and won
So it's darkest dungeon but from a greedy company? Got it
Loving the concord t-shirt - literally the only money that game made 😂
Are csgo skins not nfts then? I feel like if a game sets up the nfts just like the steam csgo system i think this could work and not really be a big problem
there aint no way ubisoft just went to HeroForge and made a bunch of minis
I like the design of the game, the figurines and the way they move, I wish there was a warhammer game like that, sadly it's ubisoft and nfts...
It’s crazy to me that every customer says they are greedy and they then decide to release THIS to …what? Confirm it? This is such a stupid decision
When nftbros actually kind of existed….3-4 years ago… i feel like they would have loved this. An actually decent graphics game from a famous publisher. They could have made a good amount of money off it. Not now. Now they blow up their company and don’t even make a profit
Why do the champions look like HeroForge minis?
NFT’s in 2024 is wild 😂
This is pathetic.
NFTs in 2024? 😂😂😂 it had to be ubisoft
These NFTs kind of just look like they were made in basic Heroforge.
They're just throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks at this point.
The Harry Potter chess scene has more creativity then this -_-
Imagine dropping down the down payment on a half million pound house on an NFT that is already worthless. Both of which I could afford.
Exos Heroes was a very impressive looking (for its time) Mobile Gacha game which then shut down and the company bastardized it into an NFT battle game (Desperado B218) just like this (horribly money-hungry company who took P2W to the extreme which killed the game). Makes for a MUCH more impressive looking game than this, which looks like a mobile game from 2005. Eventually they "paused" the NFT aspects of the game and started porting the original RPG content back into the game again... but the hope was people would spend time playing the game, gacha for new characters, level them up, then port them into the NFT battle game. Good luck with that...
I made an OKX wallet and bought USDT how can I put my wallet in limercoin they gave me this seed phrase (image you tuition loan endless kit north item dice during home filter) how can I move my wallet to an exchange?
NFTs is literally a proven scam. So Ubisoft just outted themselves as scammers lmao 😂
Oh, so its not NFT Raid Shadow Legends, its worse: NFT DB Xenoverse 2 Hero Collosseum. What a mess lmao
No production and marketing, only publishing it. Miniatures price set for having a laugh lol. Style is cool. Ubisoft has nothing to do with this. Let's move to better news
do you work for ubi? lmao
i smell copium
It doesn't change the fact they put their name on this
At this point i think ubisoft executives have humiliation fetish.