these games may appear to be unfairly one-sided due to one team randomly drawing alot of overpowered cards that may or may not be design mistakes, and this might cause some to think that the state of modern yugioh is untenable, or even "bullshit". but consider that the team i was rooting for won and therefore the game is perfectly balanced in every way actually
Duels in order: 1. Went second with maxx c 2. Went second with 2 hand traps + combo vs purrely 3. Went second vs hard brick 4. Went first vs no hand traps into full combo 5. Went second into full combo no hand traps and lost 6. Went second had 2 hand traps + Maxx c That sums up the MD experience, 0 interesting moments or interactions that decided anything. You could’ve laid the hands out on the table and picked winners without playing.
@@YeahSureLetsGoSeeYamchathis tournament format only have 3 shared cards, the fact that you also need to distribute equal non-shared staple card also shows the team decision on considering every opponent board state Also, bricking can be minimized by having better card slot between starter, extender, non-engine, etc. while deckbuilding. The fact that Emre's capability of less bricking while using Floowandereeze is in another level on deckbuilding skill
@@theonethathungers5552So you didnt watch the first match of the video at all or are you so use to maxx c doing its thing that you didnt notice Josh's hand into OTK
Very well done Mr. Streamer. In Indonesia your last pairing will be on 08.05, keep doing the best like you all three always do, keep the 1st title tight !!
Did we watch the same game? I see 2 handtraps, a bystial (basically 2 becayse it's mag) and a field spell, like yes handtraps and otks are normal and purrley just so happens to struggle against handtraps, this is why the fiendsmith package is cool to make less non games like that butbofc this is MD
damn this really displays the state of modern yugioh. these are some of the best players in the game and it seems like there was almost no skill expression here. game 1: opens maxx c, opponent doesn't have an answer, wins game 2: handtrap first two things the opponent attempts to do, opponent passes with nothing, wins game 3: opponents bricks and passes, wins game 4: goes first with the best deck in the format, has called by for the one handtrap the opponent has, wins game 5: goes second, doesn't have any handtraps, *loses* game 6: opens maxx c, opponent doesn't have an answer, wins almost every game was decided either by the coin flip or maxx c resolving. this is not a dig at the players, but just the shitty state of this format.
@@cladiosanchez6865 yes, if we are gonna coinflip the matches anyway, lets go back to tear format, at least it was fun to watch (snake eyes is so fucking boring)
@@cladiosanchez6865 also its only gamba with limits and shit - if there are 12 ishiszus and 9 tear girls + other tear cards - its not really gambling but yeah maxx c was less impactful in the tear mirrors last year; if you brick you lose is just the game for the last couple decades so thats always the thing with some luck in drawing a hand. And handtrap turbo decks are at least a bit less possible with this format - but also only 1 crossout and 2 called by per team make them resolve more often.
Well making dyno instead of swinging over Baron or angel then making dyno. Baron got the negate back because it was impermed. These events are long though and even the best can make mistakes.
3:31 why didn't the opponent use radiance on first action in quantals main phase to special Lo, Lo places blessing and then on the next summon he can special a skull guardian from hand? (which I assume he had cause he searched for sauravis for no reason)
I'm a typical platinum duelist in master duel but watching this made me feel like voiceless isn't that great of a deck? Every voiceless endboard was kind of easy to break and I don't see how this deck wins, am I missing something?
@@bvolkner3715 so technically it WAS a strong deck (in the tcg) when it first came out but the release order in MD made it look worse because even stronger decks (e.g. yubel/fire king snake eyes) are already released? thanks for the clarification!
It's just relatively simplistic and linear, not super duper versatile with its plays, and very reactive. You can't break boards with engine other than baiting stuff out, battle, or building a whole board and then saccing it for dyna mondo or other super minus link plays that would make you lose on the followup, for example. Whereas other new and old meta decks can break through and extend through stuff during their combo.
It's still a good deck and pretty consistent deck tho. Going first, usually ends on an omni negate, a spell or summon negate (or both if you have a nice hand), anti-targeting negate, 1-3 pops, targeting and battle protection, and ability to recover through stuff like super poly. Also 1-2 hand traps. Also a lot of recycling on the followup. Not a weak board by any means.
These games definitely made a base case for our current meta. But we also cannot just discount that perhaps the winning team built their decks better and thus drew better hands. It’s very possible that every player built the most meta deck possible for their chosen archetype. But until I see the deck lists I’m not going to assume that one team lost because the format is unfair when everyone has access to the same unfairness. That’s a loser mentality. Again, revealing the lists might change my mind.
Once again showing that you either need to go first or have the better hand traps to win lol. It’s so ridiculous that it boils down to if the person going second has a max c and if the person going first has the negate for it.
@@tweekin7out it’s to the point where it’s no longer the meta that’s the problem (although its not great but it’s definitely better than it has been) but a fundamental game problem that 99.9% of the fan base agree on but nothing is done about it somehow. Baffling
these games may appear to be unfairly one-sided due to one team randomly drawing alot of overpowered cards that may or may not be design mistakes, and this might cause some to think that the state of modern yugioh is untenable, or even "bullshit". but consider that the team i was rooting for won and therefore the game is perfectly balanced in every way actually
Even with all the BS going on the better team won 8 of 9 games. That's too much of a flex to just chalk down to luck.
drawing better than your opp is simply a diff in skill
Duels in order:
1. Went second with maxx c
2. Went second with 2 hand traps + combo vs purrely
3. Went second vs hard brick
4. Went first vs no hand traps into full combo
5. Went second into full combo no hand traps and lost
6. Went second had 2 hand traps + Maxx c
That sums up the MD experience, 0 interesting moments or interactions that decided anything. You could’ve laid the hands out on the table and picked winners without playing.
@@YeahSureLetsGoSeeYamchathis tournament format only have 3 shared cards, the fact that you also need to distribute equal non-shared staple card also shows the team decision on considering every opponent board state
Also, bricking can be minimized by having better card slot between starter, extender, non-engine, etc. while deckbuilding. The fact that Emre's capability of less bricking while using Floowandereeze is in another level on deckbuilding skill
This was so brutal to watch
This was boring to Watch*
Crazy to me that Konami can watch games like these and be like "yeah Maxx c is cool to exist in the same game as 1-card starters like snake eyes ash"
We are talking about the same people who proof read VFD, Gumblar, Myst Mine and thought "ah yes, these are fine, ship them", my expectation is low.
Maxx C did nothing these games, what are you talking about
@@theonethathungers5552 They are talking about the tournament overall.
These guys made painful choice. I know it was 25 years ago but that’s hardly an excuse.
@@theonethathungers5552So you didnt watch the first match of the video at all or are you so use to maxx c doing its thing that you didnt notice Josh's hand into OTK
The MD worlds music is so sick
Very well done Mr. Streamer. In Indonesia your last pairing will be on 08.05, keep doing the best like you all three always do, keep the 1st title tight !!
Update: They will go to the next round after having 2nd place in swiss, good job, very proud of you all 🎉
2nd game was brutal, all handtraps + 1 centurion field spell into OTK. now that's modern yugioh right there
Did we watch the same game? I see 2 handtraps, a bystial (basically 2 becayse it's mag) and a field spell, like yes handtraps and otks are normal and purrley just so happens to struggle against handtraps, this is why the fiendsmith package is cool to make less non games like that butbofc this is MD
Nah, it was just a bad matchup for Purrly.
You guys are killing it today
damn this really displays the state of modern yugioh. these are some of the best players in the game and it seems like there was almost no skill expression here.
game 1: opens maxx c, opponent doesn't have an answer, wins
game 2: handtrap first two things the opponent attempts to do, opponent passes with nothing, wins
game 3: opponents bricks and passes, wins
game 4: goes first with the best deck in the format, has called by for the one handtrap the opponent has, wins
game 5: goes second, doesn't have any handtraps, *loses*
game 6: opens maxx c, opponent doesn't have an answer, wins
almost every game was decided either by the coin flip or maxx c resolving.
this is not a dig at the players, but just the shitty state of this format.
Would much rather go back to tear. It was fun to watch people high roll the world championship on a mill.
@@cladiosanchez6865 yes, if we are gonna coinflip the matches anyway, lets go back to tear format, at least it was fun to watch (snake eyes is so fucking boring)
@@cladiosanchez6865 also its only gamba with limits and shit - if there are 12 ishiszus and 9 tear girls + other tear cards - its not really gambling
but yeah maxx c was less impactful in the tear mirrors last year; if you brick you lose is just the game for the last couple decades so thats always the thing with some luck in drawing a hand. And handtrap turbo decks are at least a bit less possible with this format - but also only 1 crossout and 2 called by per team make them resolve more often.
Damn body bag. Feel like Enzo definitely misplayed that last game.
I was thinking the same thing. That end board was weak.
yeah feel so too
Well making dyno instead of swinging over Baron or angel then making dyno. Baron got the negate back because it was impermed. These events are long though and even the best can make mistakes.
@@LeftOverSharkx2 cant swing over anything once Chaos Angel hit the field, had both light and dark material
@@HaydnOwnsYou oh yeah I forgot about that shit my bad 🤣🤣🤣
Almost a clean sweep! Must have felt good after bad luck in round 1
Drawing Maxx C always makes me feel i am the better player 😎
3:31 why didn't the opponent use radiance on first action in quantals main phase to special Lo, Lo places blessing and then on the next summon he can special a skull guardian from hand? (which I assume he had cause he searched for sauravis for no reason)
Can't believe team MDGrinder all played mokey mokey decks in 2024 (/s)
time to ban Snake Eyes and Apo
the josh-off
Man that was brutal...
Thank you so much, Tyl0o
Let's go Quantal!!
I really like the intro for these games.
@Josh rooting for u bro
Is sagde will not see jessy vs josh in final
Go Snipehunters!
Yall smoked the DB dude…
CENTUR-ION BEST DECK LETS GOOOOO
It is never Voiceless Voice winning, it is always the other deck losing.
Since we have worlds competitors here, the other decks were winning.
Damn almost the 5-0 sweep
That would be a 9-0. It's best to 5, not 5 games in total
@@Ddiaboloer ?
@@therealfrank6393 The ending score was 8-1. So the more impressive thing would be 9-0.
@@Ddiaboloer youre being very "but erm actually 🤓" for something that they very obviously meant, as its best to 5, and a 5-0 is a 9-0
@@Ddiaboloer you cant get 9:0 since its first to get to 5 points
I'm a typical platinum duelist in master duel but watching this made me feel like voiceless isn't that great of a deck? Every voiceless endboard was kind of easy to break and I don't see how this deck wins, am I missing something?
Voiceless came very late into MD
@@bvolkner3715 so technically it WAS a strong deck (in the tcg) when it first came out but the release order in MD made it look worse because even stronger decks (e.g. yubel/fire king snake eyes) are already released? thanks for the clarification!
the deck got powercrept without a single hit on ocg and tcg banlist pretty much tells u how it can't catch up with the meta.
It's just relatively simplistic and linear, not super duper versatile with its plays, and very reactive. You can't break boards with engine other than baiting stuff out, battle, or building a whole board and then saccing it for dyna mondo or other super minus link plays that would make you lose on the followup, for example. Whereas other new and old meta decks can break through and extend through stuff during their combo.
It's still a good deck and pretty consistent deck tho. Going first, usually ends on an omni negate, a spell or summon negate (or both if you have a nice hand), anti-targeting negate, 1-3 pops, targeting and battle protection, and ability to recover through stuff like super poly. Also 1-2 hand traps. Also a lot of recycling on the followup. Not a weak board by any means.
These games definitely made a base case for our current meta. But we also cannot just discount that perhaps the winning team built their decks better and thus drew better hands.
It’s very possible that every player built the most meta deck possible for their chosen archetype. But until I see the deck lists I’m not going to assume that one team lost because the format is unfair when everyone has access to the same unfairness. That’s a loser mentality.
Again, revealing the lists might change my mind.
Purely and rescue ace feel like copium
Who ever played voiceless lost hmm 🤔
Konami shits into the mouth of the few very dedicated players once again
But I suppose this is their life now
Quantual mvp of this Worlds 😂😂😂
Ah yes the world champ diffrence maxx c
emre my goat but he shoulda done druiswurm 1 chaos angel 2 in that last game
Centurion Bystial is strong choice!!
Quantal being pretty unlucky these 2 series.
At least he won 1 game.
I think his deck choices won't be the best ones even if he loves Tearlament...
@@FSF4liveIsn't Jesse playing Tear as well?
first game in and it's already a maxx C diff. KONAMI do something hello?
This is pure RNG.
Very painful to watch.
Seems not really fair
That second round was crazy, you wiped the floor with them Mr Schmidt!
Once again showing that you either need to go first or have the better hand traps to win lol. It’s so ridiculous that it boils down to if the person going second has a max c and if the person going first has the negate for it.
it's infuriating how true this is. the only match where that wasn't the case was when the person going first bricked and just passed lmao.
@@tweekin7out it’s to the point where it’s no longer the meta that’s the problem (although its not great but it’s definitely better than it has been) but a fundamental game problem that 99.9% of the fan base agree on but nothing is done about it somehow. Baffling
go first or go next it's simple as that...
Seeing DBGrinder get hosed was very satisfying to watch
kekw bro really bring purrely to worlds, shit so ass
maxx c sucks
First like
Terrible deck choices 😢
what would you have used?
@@Ragnarok540Obviously, the secret sauce rogue deck that they have an unbeatable deck list for and won locals with once.
This might be the least interesting worlds I’ve ever watched. This format absolutely sucks
i cant believe people are actually playing voiceless over branded or yubel , that deck is mega ASS
Yubel is Hyper ass
Its good again max c
yubel lose way too much to power spell bozo