Question Time | 27th October 2022
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- Fiona Bruce presents an hour of debate from Dulwich in South London. On the panel are minister of state in the department for levelling up Lucy Frazer MP, Labour’s shadow secretary of state for foreign affairs David Lammy MP, journalist and broadcaster Julia Hartley-Brewer and screenwriter and producer Armando Iannucci.
Copyright (C) BBC, BBC News, BBC One, BBC Worldwide, 2022. If you would like me to remove this video, please contact me, not TH-cam.
Hey! It would be greatly appreciated if you could buy me a coffee in lieu of all the videos I have uploaded. Everything here is free, worldwide. It really helps, Thank You.
www.buymeacoff...
"we get the politicians we deserve" says an employee of the Telegraph. Speechless.
I agree. For better and for worse, in democracies people always get the politicians they deserve
@@darraghmcentee7522 You do realise that the majority of Britain's Parliamentarians are unelected right?
@@darraghmcentee7522 democracy was long abolished. Both main parties are owned by big money, as are the media. Any politician is paying regard to the fortunes on offer after their political careers, see Blair, D Milliband, Cameron, May etc. Therefore any illusion of choice is a case of moving the deckchairs on the Titanic.
Dumb it's an old saying probably dates back to the roman senate, just watch who you vote for
The bigger question for democracy in the UK is why do multi millionaires want to run and stand in government for the Tories when the minister salary is only about 80K? They aren't doing it for the salary so why are they choosing those careers?
ego
Power and control.
power, the love of control of others and a cushy job later.
Well, it’s not just the Tories. Keir starmer is hardly poor. They take these positions so they can influence the system to further enrich their wealth.
@@bushman143 that's true, but it's not quite as personal as that. The politicians don't have as much power as you think. They are subject to the power of the billionaire media and the billionaires and corporations who fund their campaigns.
You can see this in the way that Starmer has run away from all the promises he made to get the job as Labour leader. The policies are very popular with the public, but he is running scared from the Murdoch press.
Just as in previous installments of this program, the Tory MP on the panel is given at least twice as much time to speak than a Labour MP. And the Labour member is very frequently interrupted.
You can see why in some circles she's known as Julia Halfwit Brewer.
Rishi Sunak will do absolutely nothing.
Julia Hartley-Brewer is satire, but an episode that you've seen dozens of times and already know the lines coming up. Still hilarious though.
she was the only one who speaks sence
@@katieadams3080 So much wrong with that sentence 😅
Yes she challenges yr pea brain therefore she's a heretic. Obviously your politicians control the temperature of earth, keep believing that.
@@richardhall4830 and you keep believing what the BBC and elites keep telling you
@@katieadams3080 on your side, friendly fire there. 🔥
Democracy is everybody voting and deciding our future.
Lammy trying to put Julia down, the man is as thick as two short planks.
The answer to the question why do individuals go into politics re the salary is for me quite simple…. It is nothing to do with the 80/150k depending on your position, but consider how much they make or potentially make that has nothing to do with their salary? Obviously the classic example is Rishi Sunak a multi, multi millionaire in his own right and the husband of a billionaire heiress.
1)Answer, they have the power to change/ implement legislation that can give them untold financial gain ( otherwise known as greed)
2)They have a position that can influence new laws and regulations and it’s commonly known, they benefit from 2nd/3rd interests outside of parliamentary duties.
3)They receive all kinds of ‘under the table’ reward/ benefits or opportunities to gain both financially and through gifts (corporate guests at major events)
The list goes on and on….. there are I hope some who are in it for the ‘good of the people’ but I’m finding it harder and harder to find them!
Armando knowing everything and exposing idiots is great
Nope
180 billion per year ,
and it's underfunded
😂😂😂
Why is Hartley-Brewer introduced as a ‘journalist’, someone who gathers and processes information and then impartially disseminates it to the public rather than the right-wing activist, some might say mouthpiece that she acctally is?
Because the BBC editorial standards are now controlled by Tory donors and Tory place men (and women). the DG is a Tory donor. Half the exec board are. Most of the rest are corporate execs with stakes in other large businesses.
This video will tell you a lot about the UK media that is worth knowing.
th-cam.com/video/eUkdkQojHFM/w-d-xo.html
No journalist 'gathers and processes information in an impartial way' Why do the think so many people are getting away with being basically corrupt in a veritable sea of journalists?. JHB is giving another side to the debate and it says something that people claiming impartiality get upset with hearing another side. Which does exist.
She is a journalist and if you listen to her regularly you would realise she isn’t impartial and does not pretend to be! She leaves that to the BBC
@@MAC-mp2hu
She isn't a journalist. She's a commentator and she comes from a job in the city. She hasn't broken any original reporting in her life. She is paid to peddle the lines that Murdoch wants her to. And Murdoch has been peddling climate denial for 2 decades.
As for impartiality, the BBC have been failing on that for a very long time.
Facts have no party....🤷🏿♂️
Sheer hypocracy and performance from Julia for patronise working class for being too, stupid/uneducated/whatever to take part in climate protests. It's not long ago since I remember hearing her arguing against the remain side for patronising the working class who voted for Brexit. If they can make up their own minds about leaving the EU (and have time to fight for that), surely they can do the same about the climate.
She’s a professional troll. She can’t do proper journalism so she trolls.
hypocrisy
(with an "i")
Don't think your English is the best.
From the man who can’t even spell the word. What a clown. 😂
@@kaymumby46 you are deluded
Julia Hartley Brewer just gave BBC viewers reason not to tune into any of her own broadcasts as she is onviously a blatant truth denier. Sponsers of those that employ or fund her should be ashamed of themselves.
She Brexiteer also
Thanks
Reform the parliament!!!
Grr politicians and commentators need to stop relying on health care workers and professionals from overseas coming to support theNHS. It makes my blood boil! The world is short staffed when it comes to health care and we are depriving needy countres. What absolute arrogance! Successive governments have been acutely aware of this. We need to train our own and make working conditions more attractive.
I live in Australia and more health care professionals are migrating from uk as pay and working conditions mean a better work/life balance. And just for the record I do not approve of this continual poaching from each other.
not in cuba. they have the highest number of exported doctors
Half the audience work for the state
So the people ask for a general election thus to exercise their political/ constitutional right to vote and the Tory says no , and Britain just obey 🤦♀️ am I in a nightmare or hell?!
Tory Health Policy; "No Insurance? Fuck You!"
Labour health policy, get in the queue f*** you. Not much different really.
@@richardhall4830 The NHS was rated independently as one of the best healthcare systems in the world 15 years ago. Interesting take you have there, like the queues are not insane at the moment.
I'm just pointing out there is nothing that virtuous about rationing by queue vs making ppl pay, ppl die waiting. All the best healthcare systems don't follow our Soviet model but some private public mix, see Japan, France, Germany etc. This moronic debate about our sacred cow is really tiresome.
@@richardhall4830 We have private healthcare in the UK. People can go that route, what is unacceptable is how run down it has become when it has legitimately functioned very well in the past, the Tories claim to be a party of growth, well why can't they run the public healthcare system better than it was 15 years ago? Those without the means have no choice.
@@thezyg6311 you miss the point. In the countries with good healthcare systems government does not obsessively plan healthcare, rather it leaves it to ppl who know what they are doing with better outcomes. At the same time it prevents profiteering and market failure of the worst kind we see in parts of the US system. I don't see what you have against the superior french, German or Japanese models which clearly work better, where government is essentially subsidising a largely private system at arms length with regulated prices.
Lucy Frazer MP . . . . "Delivered for the country".
UK = 0.87% of the World's population, 6th highest national covid fatality rate.
What else is there to know?
As for Hartley-Brewer's tripe about the NHS . . . . . . Germany has a way more efficient and value for money public health service. Funded by private insurance companies operating as non-profit making businesses in their health insurance departments. One can choose an insurance company relative to job or profession, employer pays a portion and government takes over payment in case of unemployment. Their railway, run under a similar pragmatic approach, has fares a fraction of ours AND invest and make profit from our privatised shambles of a rip off.
Look @ Lammy Trying 2 DO an Impression OFF a ???
Family is economic security and always has been'
We just dot want these politicians anymore
american here, sorry. what is 'leveling up'?
It's applying the highest standard to all areas of the country, so for example, public transport in the north should be as good quality and extensive as that elsewhere. It's the opposite of the lowest common denominator, often promoted by the left, for example, if one person is poor, everyone should be poor.
@@perolagrande thanks. that makes sense, but wanted to be sure
Leveling up is a term used to gaslight the British public into thinking that the Tories care about the entire UK population across all regions.
@@lugano1999 Care isn't measured by how much taxpayer's money is squandered and thrown around. The government's role is not to finance your lifestyle.
@@lugano1999 Tories care about South East of England
A panel of 2 men, 2 women, both men talked of facts in a rational and intelligent manner. The women , on the other hand, did nothing but gaslight and lie for the full hour of the show. The tory one was bad enough but Brewer is an embarassment to herself, her friends and family and the nation as a whole. I'd recommend her for a job as a cleaner in a care home but she's not up to it!
Do you have to discuss the gender though, I agree that Julia is a right wing activist with awful views and the tory Mp is lying as usual but the fact they’re women has nothing to do with it
@@caitlinbrennan9039 I am pointing out that in this instance there were seemingly strong ideological dividing line between the men and women on the panel. By the same token, I remember some years ago, women from 2 ethnic groups who had lost a child through violence were asked about punishment and forgiveness. One group was virtua;lly 100% for the return of the death penalty, the other group were all about forgiveness. So you are right that it's not about gender however there are other aspects at play.
The level of group think in the audience is astonishing. Only Julia talking sense and seemingly capable of independent thought. Love her.
We are dealing with ppl who believe in nothing. Zero COVID and net zero are religious beliefs. Both are barking mad and totally unachievable, look how zero COVID worked out. It's a form of puritanism as well as a deep loathing of humanity that is inherent in most ppl on the left. Ppl who believe in nothing can come to believe anything.
Extreme right-wing harpy
@@mediolanumhibernicus3353 gosh harpy, you really don't like women do you, I think she's happily married with kids.
@@richardhall4830 love women.
Dislike this harridan.
Try to keep up.
@@mediolanumhibernicus3353 sounds like you have issues with strong women, yr just engaging in ad hominem rather than debating her ideas. Pathetic.
I'm about to complain about Julia Hartley Brewer for her response to the climate emergency question on this programme: she has pushed fake news for long enough.
there is no climate emergency
Whinger*
Who's the purple mannequin? She appears a bit odd.
Rishi Sunak's mum, by the sound of it...
LOL lammy talking about breaking political code what a hypocrite
Julia is surrounded by illiterates.... 🤔 ❓️
Julia has more intelligence then all of the panel put together and why would anyone vote for labour as we are in this mess due to COVID policy which Labour wanted more and longer lockdowns.
Before commenting on sum-intelligence, might I suggest that you master a little bit of syntax?
Best of luck -and best wishes to yours. ❤️
@@robertcottam9000 go and put your mask back on.
@@tortoisebore8642
A most constructive response. Best wishes you.
Well thank you for acknowledging I won.
@@tortoisebore8642
Syntax and punctuation, dear; syntax and punctuation...
Adult literacy classes are available.
Go for it! In a couple of years, there's a good chance that you'll understand what you mean to say.
Thoughts and prayers.
❤️
And then WE see Lamey & Julie//////////////smileing & each other
Sorry Julia
Why is Diane abbots son doing there
Anyone caught destroying other peoples art should be in jail not face jail. I understand the right to protest but that art was amazing and ruined by spoiled hippies
The art was not damaged in any way.
They aren't hippies.
Their demand is simple and perfectly reasonable. The government should stop issuing fossil fuel licenses when we know that this will lead to catastrophic climate chaos and the deaths of millions of people.
Which is worse? Chucking soup against some glass or deliberate mass murder so the fossil fuel industry can make a few more billions at our expense?
@@michaelrch 🥱🥱🥱🥱🥱🥱
The art wasn't destroyed. They are all protected by glass cover. No damage was done. A silly stunt certainly, but there is alot of hyperbole around what actually happened
@@leckstar100x9
You are upset about a painting that wasn't damaged. But millions dead is fine.
Please stay away from other people.
@@michaelrch the planet’s climate has always changed this is not a one off so relax and stop talking 💩💩💩