Nice, factual, funny, and short. Seems I've found yet another channel to subscribe to :) The way you recycle the color design from Francis Collin's slides is an exellent detail. It really helps to drive the point.
mammals do not share ´´pseudogenes´´ with other classes of animals, so in any case, pseudogenes disprove the idea that mammals share a common ancestor with reptiles, birds, fish etc.
@AllstarCanadian Francis Collins, head of the NIH, is a brilliant scientist and Christian as well. However, he is not a creationist. A link for the entire speech is found in the description box.
If we lived in a world without time then by definition it would not exist. Besides, the existence of something that did not interact with our known universe would be moot as we would not interact with it. It would be supernatural, and thus science would make no comment on it. And I understood your point, but like I said, it's a moot point.
That is what your words say. You say that god got things started and just let them go. That is akin to a parent bringing a child into this world and then just sitting back while they struggle to survive.
@jbkgjbkg Because they where isolated from the rest of the world on Austraila and New Guinea. They found a niche where no or few other lifeforms competed with them and that's why their offspring are still alive today.
He is not a creationist, Francis Collins is pro evolution theory and not against evolution theory. Did you really actually read his book? On his book the language of god, he clearly explain that creationist and intelligent design is absurd.
If any human parent acted in the manner that god has he or she would have had their children taken away and probably been jailed. You can not honestly call that god benevolent.
We couldn't, but for us it would be irrelevant as we would never interact with time nor would the world around us. Your point is moot, completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand. Straw man arguments will not win this debate for you.
@malithe00 Since you put it that way, sounds a lot like Creationism, Oh except for all that nasty evidence (extinguished species, speciation, fossil record, genetic similarity, reproduction mechanisms, ...) Yeah At least Creationism doesn't have nasty evidence and fact standing in the way of accepting it as a viable explanation. All I have to do is believe and ask forgiveness of a tyrannical God
I never understood how you could believe in Evolution and still consider yourself a Christian (or a member of any other Religous denomination for that matter). Agnostic? Yes. But why you'd blindly except the inherent illogic, overtly supernatural events, contradictions and hypocrisy contained in the bible is beyond me.
So you're saying that an omnipotent and omniscient god left the genes for...let's say sickle cell trait(which is incredibly painful and possibly fatal)...in the human genome just because he was lazy? And you then go on to say that this god is also a merciful and loving god? Sorry but even though I write fantasy in my spare time I still can't suspend my disbelief enough to swallow that load of crap.
Nice, factual, funny, and short. Seems I've found yet another channel to subscribe to :)
The way you recycle the color design from Francis Collin's slides is an exellent detail. It really helps to drive the point.
beautifully created. love it!
:) ruben
mammals do not share ´´pseudogenes´´ with other classes of animals, so in any case, pseudogenes disprove the idea that mammals share a common ancestor with reptiles, birds, fish etc.
@AllstarCanadian Francis Collins, head of the NIH, is a brilliant scientist and Christian as well. However, he is not a creationist. A link for the entire speech is found in the description box.
I just love platypuses! Their so weird-looking, but so cute! : )
If we lived in a world without time then by definition it would not exist. Besides, the existence of something that did not interact with our known universe would be moot as we would not interact with it. It would be supernatural, and thus science would make no comment on it.
And I understood your point, but like I said, it's a moot point.
So we are all designed by someone with the skills of a Windows XP programmer?
The disturbing part is how much that would actually explain.
Well, we theoretically live in a ten dimensional universe. I'm no mathematician but what I've seen of string theory is mathematically sound.
@Answerquestions1 Why the fuck does two species of mammal lay eggs then?
That is what your words say. You say that god got things started and just let them go. That is akin to a parent bringing a child into this world and then just sitting back while they struggle to survive.
@jbkgjbkg Because they where isolated from the rest of the world on Austraila and New Guinea. They found a niche where no or few other lifeforms competed with them and that's why their offspring are still alive today.
"mammals don't lay egggs" echidna and platypus still do... =D
He is not a creationist, Francis Collins is pro evolution theory and not against evolution theory. Did you really actually read his book? On his book the language of god, he clearly explain that creationist and intelligent design is absurd.
Lmao, this guy made a meme using the song from tic-tok 9 years before anybody else did.
but if God is all-powerful, all-knowing and whatnot, it shouldn't bother him.
Well, common in some, but far from many.
If any human parent acted in the manner that god has he or she would have had their children taken away and probably been jailed. You can not honestly call that god benevolent.
Appeal to force, fallacy.
And yes, I know you're being sarcastic.
I can't help but ask for evidence, I'm a PEARList.
This is all subjective and thus, not concrete, or even evidence.
We couldn't, but for us it would be irrelevant as we would never interact with time nor would the world around us. Your point is moot, completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand. Straw man arguments will not win this debate for you.
Windows is evolving backwards, look at Vista XD
Great!
Which creation site did you get this bullshit from?
So where is the empirical evidence that your god exists?
@malithe00 Since you put it that way, sounds a lot like Creationism, Oh except for all that nasty evidence (extinguished species, speciation, fossil record, genetic similarity, reproduction mechanisms, ...) Yeah At least Creationism doesn't have nasty evidence and fact standing in the way of accepting it as a viable explanation.
All I have to do is believe and ask forgiveness of a tyrannical God
I never understood how you could believe in Evolution and still consider yourself a Christian (or a member of any other Religous denomination for that matter). Agnostic? Yes. But why you'd blindly except the inherent illogic, overtly supernatural events, contradictions and hypocrisy contained in the bible is beyond me.
there is no evidence for that, in fact the majority of evidence supports evoluion.
So you're saying that an omnipotent and omniscient god left the genes for...let's say sickle cell trait(which is incredibly painful and possibly fatal)...in the human genome just because he was lazy? And you then go on to say that this god is also a merciful and loving god? Sorry but even though I write fantasy in my spare time I still can't suspend my disbelief enough to swallow that load of crap.