The video said they were useless, but I would think LINEs and SINEs serve as some form of error correction code, right? If 30% of our DNA is LINEs and SINEs which nither inhibit nor cause protein formation, then these segments of the genome can be mutated without causing any major change to the function of the genome (unless if the mutation makes the LINEs and SINEs mutate into a protein-forming sequence) which makes the genome resistant to "errors". Or am I completely getting his wrong?
@graphicism, Darwin's theory is that evolution is shaped by natural selection, evolution was an established fact long before Darwin was born, it was just that no one knew what was directing it. Evolution is fact, natural selection is the theory.
This video is an overview. It doesn't go into the details. We are supposed to take his word on things. Also, he doesn't take into account the idea that the gene sequences are similar because the phenotype is similar. After all, the genome is the coding for the species, and if two species are similar, then the coding should be similar. Common sense.
This is an open forum where anyone can express their opinions. It doesn't matter what motivates a person. Unfortunately the free flow of ideas sometimes turns confrontational. Are You suggesting I should only express myself when I'm in total agreement with someone ?
@RazielKain Interesting point. It will also be difficult for additional human speciation to occur since globalization has begun to remove the barriers of isolated gene pools. In human evolution we may see a convergence rather than a traditional divergence.
@RazielKain "Germs are mostly killed by medicine" Germs are evolving too. It is a constant battle and we may still lose it. Some positive adaptations are also happening like people who can see more in the ultraviolet range but we are still homo sapiens.
@graphicism That's interesting. I didn't know any comparative genetic studies had been done between neanderthals and 5000 year humans. They have only recently been done between neanderthals and living humans
@RobeonMew It's entirely relevant. It's not my problem if you can't see that. In any case, the computers you mention all have similar designs, which have all "descended" from earlier, more basic designs. Any computer that uses windows is going to have to have hardware that is compatible with it. So your analogy doesn't really prove anything.
Thanks for sharing this, as for protein structure, to be able to perform their biological function, proteins fold into one or more specific spatial conformations driven by a number of non-covalent interactions such as hydrogen bonding, ionic interactions, Van der Waals forces, and hydrophobic packing.
@joonzville "We DO have natural selection" No argument there but don't count on a new speciation event any time soon without some catastrophic change in our environment. Even isolation of populations necessary for such a "macro" event are increasingly rare.
@plevyman that's not the point. don't use a different factor to try to disprove another. computers were an example. a metaphor even. ppl on the internet relate to PCs more.
@WhoisJacqueFresco Fact: the number of possible amino acid chain sequences that form proteins capable of creating said function, outnumber the total number of atoms in the universe. I hope you use this much skepticism with the VP :)
@forest51690 Your comments are old but I'd thought I'd reply anyway. the letters you see are the letters for the 20 amino acids in the protein Cytochrome C. to follow up on the second comment, the similarities in genes would make sense because of the phenotype is the same but they are comaring a protein found in all eukaryotes and therefore the sequence should be the same or similar. However it is the differences that are important here.
@ganggreensoldier Answer: Public high school, Biology is required to graduate in the USA, and they must be proficient on their final exam to get their diploma. Same with Math, History and English. Good thing too. I think(and so do State/Federal officials) it's important for people to understand the processes of life. Healthier public plus we could not compete with other countries in science and prerequisite for University Science programs.
@graphicism Actually, evolution isn't speeding up at an exponential rate. Our knowledge of the universe is increasing exponentially, but it is not passed genetically. It's passed through language/culture. Genetically, we are basically the same as our 2000 year old relatives, and they are much more different from neanderthals than they are from us. Our advancing technology actually tends to relieve many selective pressures from our species, and allows us to adapt to change without evolving.
@RazielKain Actually we are kind of in a stand still BUT notice that people like to marry persons that are similar to them. Ergo, Smart people marry smart people, athletic people marry athletic people, this actually broadens the variety of type of humans on the earth ^_^ P.S. I know there are exceptions but it is very common to marry a person similar to you.
Ok man, i'm not a PHD on molecular biology. But i know that when something goes to information (possible combinations of matter ) it easily beats quantity of matter. Protein combinations are 3D objects and can assume very different forms to do the same thing. One topic that could ilustrate that is protein folding. There is so many possibilities even in the 3D folding that just that characteristic breaks any current simulator. Search it. @WhoisJacqueFresco
It took several super computers tied together to duplicate the folding of a protein several WEEKS to do it what are cells do in a split second to 4 seconds each. Each cell has FIVE information codes. The complexity goes beyond mathematical impossibilities by self assembling-by-chance. We are a creation.
Science supporting creationism ? Please present any creation hypothesis which has passed SCIENTIFIC Peer Review & is now accepted as a SCIENTIFIC Theory.
@SmokiSounds Man, I love it when believers are pressed into the "have to make our story make sense" corner... it's ALWAYS "God is magic! He can do anything!" They just hate the word "magic" of course, but let's call a spade a spade... MAGIC.
@graphicism "I find it hard to believe in Darwinian evolution" - We all have our own personal problems. You just found one of yours.... Yours to deal with, not anyone elses.
if you must reply to a comment online. think before you post. 3 comments that were half assed made me wonder how they were even conjured up. please read messages completely before replying
@IFE10M Yes we see evolution I'm not denying that, I'm saying Darwinian evolution lacks falls apart when we see multiple forms of symbiotic microbes forming at both the North and South pole that have never met but are genetically identical, when life forms in the vacuum of space or in the heat of volcanic lava.
@RazielKain It might seem like that at first place, but its not necessarily true. Organisms living in the open ocean have a similar setting, that being they don`t encounter significant environmental changes or pressures. don`t be fooled though, Evolution still occurs, just much slower. we cannot eliminate all environmental pressures, there will still always be pathogens and specific environmental factors we can`t protect ourselves against with certainty
Having same genetic sequences in species and employing same enzymes to do similar work doesnt rule out the possibility of creationism.. It merely introduces the possibility of evolution.. It just means that the creater, whoever it may be, is either lazy to make different enzymes for different task, or lack creativity, or prefers to have a standardized and systematic construction of animal species using similar spare parts..
@teemuruskeepaa So are you arguing that calling multicellular life more complex is based only on a sociocultural construct? And where do cultures enter into this?
@mphmm Ahehehehehe sorry. I was actually using the word "marry" as a sort of pact or agreement between the persons to love each other and promise to up-bring their children to have the optimal chance for survival. During the course of the agreement, they constantly show and remind to each other why they loved him/her.
@teemuruskeepaa Interesting points, I agree that they are not the best phrases to use, but how is this implying that we must do as our authorities tell us? It sounds more like your reading too much into this Please explain if i'm wrong.
@graphicism "Darwinian evolution would have you believe this process has stopped" That's why the term "Darwinian evolution" is mostly used as a strawman, because Darwin made errors while the current evolutionary theory hasn't been falsified. "We have rejected many of Darwin's [ideas] in the succeeding 150 years. Still the core remains." --John Hawks "...I don't know any evolutionary biologists who call their field 'Darwinism'. They call it, well, 'evolutionary biology." --John Hawks
@bengacris Yeah, I know that but I'm trying to figure out the point teemuruskeepaa is trying to make. As far as I can tell he argues that there is some kind of "worms are better than yeast which means some cultures are better than others" thing going on in the vid and I just don't see where.
look for "large numbers" and you will see that the number of atoms in the universe can be easily supassed by a simple probability question. @WhoisJacqueFresco
@graphicism "We are more genetically different from people of 5000 years ago than they were from Neanderthals." Hmm, interesting. I'd never heard that before and assumed you were confused. I'm certainly no expert on paleoanthropology, so I am open to this possibility. Although you said 2000ya, and Hawks said 5000ya. For all I know, Hawks is correct. But while this might change what people think about our specific evolutionary history, I don't see how it would challenge evolutionary theory.
Is it so important to either believe in creatism or evolution to destroy the opposite's arguments no matter what? Why not treat information as such and let each individual decide on their own what sounds more likely to them? No matter what you say, it is not exactly open minded to reject any other theory of how life came to be just because you decide to believe in one of these theories. As a matter of fact, science is build upon being open minded, not on rejecting ideas. Keep it as that.
With advances being made in paleogenetics, it should be possible to find the most recent genetic changes that evolution has FIXED in the human genome. This should be of scientific benefit if such changes exist, and also of interest if they do not exist.
Let's make it simple: Does Santa Claus bring presents to children? You know the flying reindeer and chimney climbing in red suit stuff... Well, that is how important it is to understand things! We can stay children and talk hocus-pokus or we can grow up and understand our responsibility and possibilities.
@SmokiSounds Oh, I think it was at least a 5th grade remark. But now let's chat about what "I know nothing about"... would that be theology, my former job, or evolutionary biology, my current job? On which would you like to try your hand? Perhaps you can start with my "3rd grade comment"... explain why this statement is inaccurate. And try to remain reasonable if at all possible.
@nobrainQQ You mean an equation? Please start listing off all of the protein combinations that can perform those functions. I don't need some bs equation based on nothing. Test every single combination out and get back to me.
Ugh, camels and pigs "ARE" closely related to hippos and whales as they are all artiodactyls. Whales and hippos are just more closely related to one another as either is to camels or pigs.
@teemuruskeepaa the proper term is "better suited" which is to say it changes in such a way it will be able to get a little bit more of out the niche it is trying to fill. Not so much in the sense of "well rats are better then mice, period"
Good video, but at ~ 1.07 he says 'new genes are created from more primitive forms in order to accomodate...', this is of course in error, evolution does not act with purpose. This is very sloppy language and it is all too common.
@HiAdrian We are already becoming significantly more intelligent through evolution speeding up at an exponential rate, even to a point now that our ancestors just 2,000 years ago are closer related to Homo neanderthalensis than we are related to our 2,000 year old relatives. I find it hard to believe in Darwinian evolution.
Fact: We have about 6 billion planetary systems in our galaxy Fact: Billions of galaxies that make up the universe "There are more possible proteins that can perform these functions than all atoms in the universe" I smell bullshit...... Anything is possible, but seriously.... 3:44
I love common descent. I love natural selection. I love Evolution. Elegant yet simple yet mind boggling. I am teaching this stuff right now in Biology and of course, there is always a clown that brings up creation tales. Eventhough I warn them to keep their stories to themselves, unless they can support their claims via the scientific method, they keep trying to slide the fairytales into my lectures. Sad brainwashing at work.
well if life evolved naturally, why do some people think that life couldn't start naturally also? i mean do we need to have a god/gods behind everything we don't fully understand? that show how ignorant some people are. lol
@forest51690, I guess you missed the part where THE GENES WERE SUBSTITUTED AND FUNCTIONED EQUALLY AS WELL, and that THERE ARE ASTRONOMICALLY NUMEROUS VERSIONS OF CYTOCHROME-C THAT PERFORM THE SAME FUNCTION but which don't exist because the genes don't exist to produce those variations. These facts utterly destroy your argument. It is not because phenotype is similar, but because of evolution from common ancestors. Or a Prankster God created things to look exactly like evolution!
it seems odd that there is always evidence to back both sides of any argument (creation/evolution, God vs Mother Nature, a devine plan vs. chance ). Its almost like we humans are purposely being kept from the truth about our origins, how we should live our lives,and our ultimate destiny. We are always kept in a state of confusion and in a state of argument and are never allowed (by the powers that be) to come together as the Human Race and exist in a state of universal truth and harmony
@theshredator Genetically we are different. "We are more genetically different from people of 5000 years ago than they were from Neanderthals. John Hawks - University of Wisconsin anthropologist
@RobeonMew You do science studies ... why do I find it hard to believe that you you actually understand your studies, and are the studies proteomics or is it christian science?
@graphicism Yeah thanks I have seen articles by John Hawks before. I just checked out your link and a more recent article on J.H. They made no mention of our relation to neanderthals nor of comparative studies between us and them. When he published the only studies on neanderthal dna were on mtDNA I think. In neither article did it suggest anything but accepted evolutionary processes are involved. Thanks
@plevyman fine. if you want to related to monkeys that badly. but as the video guy himself even said. "common ancestor". so as the analogy of Computers go, they also stem from earlier forms. so in a way, computers are more than enough to use as an analogy. Asus and Acer are nowhere close to being related ans still older "designs" stem to them. so as many are rerlated in parts and "genes", they are still unique. like i said. read the post carefully and maybe cross-reference b4 replying
@TheSpankymonkey So you unequivocally believe in Darwinism to the point it stops being a theory but a fact? Could this be blind fanatical Darwinian evolution at work?
@graphicism Evolution is a FACT because we see it happening and have evidence of it happening in the past. the THEORY of evolution explains HOW evolution happens. This is the same for all science... just replace the word "evolution" with the word "gravity" and, bar some grammatical errors, that's how science deals with gravity.
@RobeonMew Seriously, asking me to read and cross-reference your barely intelligible posts is really pointless. All living things reproduce. Humans aren't designed anew each time a baby is born - the blueprint already exists in the genetic code of its parents. It's a straightforward logical deduction that could be made by anyone with half a brain, that the pattern of common traits and genetic similarity in the tree of life indicates a pattern of relatedness and common ancestry.
@hilbert54 Not sure if I can post links but if the below link to the bbc website doesn't work google 'Human evolution is speeding up' or read the works of John Hawks. news bbc co uk/2/hi/7132794 stm
@SmokiSounds Since your knowledge of scripture would fit neatly into a thimble, I'll pass you some easy stuff to explain (away) ... Explain Zephaniah 3:6-10 using your "metaphor" and "father knows best" mentality. Oh, and be sure to toss in exactly how an all-knowing god would fail to know that his aforementioned actions would result in failure. Oh, one more thing: Zephaniah is in the Old Testament, hence the missing red letters... heh...
@theshredator Yeah I was recalling from memory but still 5,000 years, that means our 3,000BC ancestors are genetically closer related to 40,000BC humans than present day 2000AD. Darwinian evolution would have you believe this process has stopped, the evidence that it's speeding up has more to do with the energy of the earth and our place in the galaxy than it is to natural selection. In other words life radiates from the earth and DNA builds what it thinks best for the current environment.
@PsyogiBottoms duh.. you present yourself to me very poorly. Cats often kill each other with what is known as a killer bite to the spine. This negates the only argument you present here. Do you have a point or are you attempting to boost ego with insults? If so then there are parallels in the animal kingdom for ritualized conflict scenarios which further degrade your position. I recommend going to the newscientist site, for instance, so you can reference your position. learn something
@Desarollo If you're missing the point, you have a good reason. This video doesn't mention creationism, a commentator did. Yet equally your comment misses the point. But I don't want to be boring: If you need a prayer answered to relate to this video then this means the word of the god your pray to is invalid as this god in his book already clearly states where our DNA come from. Mud and rib. So you will be praying to god to change his mind ... Good luck though :D
@SmokiSounds WRONG. That's your total and unexcused ignorance speaking. What the BB states is that the universe was densely compressed; i.e. that matter and energy was ALWAYS present (first law). This says NOTHING of time; and we know that time is relative thanks to Einstein, so time may have been different but never "created". Get it? In other words, "Matter existed." Period. Science makes NO other assertions. Probably not.
The video said they were useless, but I would think LINEs and SINEs serve as some form of error correction code, right?
If 30% of our DNA is LINEs and SINEs which nither inhibit nor cause protein formation, then these segments of the genome can be mutated without causing any major change to the function of the genome (unless if the mutation makes the LINEs and SINEs mutate into a protein-forming sequence) which makes the genome resistant to "errors".
Or am I completely getting his wrong?
Good question! :-)
the answer is simple and difficult for them to take it. A designer did it!
The more we know, it is more difficult to take the creator idea...
It is simply too simple sorry.
@graphicism, Darwin's theory is that evolution is shaped by natural selection, evolution was an established fact long before Darwin was born, it was just that no one knew what was directing it. Evolution is fact, natural selection is the theory.
This channel is taking over my "Favorites"...
This video is an overview. It doesn't go into the details. We are supposed to take his word on things. Also, he doesn't take into account the idea that the gene sequences are similar because the phenotype is similar. After all, the genome is the coding for the species, and if two species are similar, then the coding should be similar. Common sense.
@forest51690, he says quite clearly "amino acid sequences". The letters refer to amino acids, not genes.
This is an open forum where anyone can express their opinions.
It doesn't matter what motivates a person.
Unfortunately the free flow of ideas sometimes turns confrontational. Are You suggesting I should only express myself when I'm in total agreement with someone ?
Excellent comment!
Amazing stuff, thanks ! My faith in your subscription is vindicated by such documentaries. I am more knowledgeable than 15 mins ago :)
3:03 - what are those letters supposed to represent? Genes? Genes are A, T, C, and G, not all the alphabet.
@RazielKain Interesting point. It will also be difficult for additional human speciation to occur since globalization has begun to remove the barriers of isolated gene pools. In human evolution we may see a convergence rather than a traditional divergence.
@RazielKain "Germs are mostly killed by medicine"
Germs are evolving too. It is a constant battle and we may still lose it. Some positive adaptations are also happening like people who can see more in the ultraviolet range but we are still homo sapiens.
@graphicism
What do you mean by darwinian evolution....?
And do you have a link to a reputable source for those assertions?
@graphicism
That's interesting. I didn't know any comparative genetic studies had been done between neanderthals and 5000 year humans. They have only recently been done between neanderthals and living humans
@RobeonMew It's entirely relevant. It's not my problem if you can't see that.
In any case, the computers you mention all have similar designs, which have all "descended" from earlier, more basic designs. Any computer that uses windows is going to have to have hardware that is compatible with it. So your analogy doesn't really prove anything.
Great video. Anyone know what the name of the first song is?
Thanks for sharing this, as for protein structure, to be able to perform their biological function, proteins fold into one or more specific spatial conformations driven by a number of non-covalent interactions such as hydrogen bonding, ionic interactions, Van der Waals forces, and hydrophobic packing.
@saxmanchiro "Elegant yet simple yet mind boggling" You said it all!
@joonzville "We DO have natural selection"
No argument there but don't count on a new speciation event any time soon without some catastrophic change in our environment. Even isolation of populations necessary for such a "macro" event are increasingly rare.
Science is beautiful.
@plevyman
that's not the point. don't use a different factor to try to disprove another. computers were an example. a metaphor even. ppl on the internet relate to PCs more.
@WhoisJacqueFresco Fact: the number of possible amino acid chain sequences that form proteins capable of creating said function, outnumber the total number of atoms in the universe. I hope you use this much skepticism with the VP :)
@forest51690 Your comments are old but I'd thought I'd reply anyway. the letters you see are the letters for the 20 amino acids in the protein Cytochrome C. to follow up on the second comment, the similarities in genes would make sense because of the phenotype is the same but they are comaring a protein found in all eukaryotes and therefore the sequence should be the same or similar. However it is the differences that are important here.
@ganggreensoldier Answer: Public high school, Biology is required to graduate in the USA, and they must be proficient on their final exam to get their diploma. Same with Math, History and English. Good thing too. I think(and so do State/Federal officials) it's important for people to understand the processes of life. Healthier public plus we could not compete with other countries in science and prerequisite for University Science programs.
@joonzville This is so awesome!! If you don't mind me asking, where are you getting this info from? I would love to learn more about it!
@graphicism Actually, evolution isn't speeding up at an exponential rate. Our knowledge of the universe is increasing exponentially, but it is not passed genetically. It's passed through language/culture. Genetically, we are basically the same as our 2000 year old relatives, and they are much more different from neanderthals than they are from us. Our advancing technology actually tends to relieve many selective pressures from our species, and allows us to adapt to change without evolving.
@graphicism what are you talking about?
@RazielKain Actually we are kind of in a stand still BUT notice that people like to marry persons that are similar to them. Ergo, Smart people marry smart people, athletic people marry athletic people, this actually broadens the variety of type of humans on the earth ^_^
P.S.
I know there are exceptions but it is very common to marry a person similar to you.
Ok man, i'm not a PHD on molecular biology. But i know that when something goes to information (possible combinations of matter ) it easily beats quantity of matter. Protein combinations are 3D objects and can assume very different forms to do the same thing. One topic that could ilustrate that is protein folding. There is so many possibilities even in the 3D folding that just that characteristic breaks any current simulator. Search it. @WhoisJacqueFresco
It took several super computers tied together to duplicate the folding of a protein several WEEKS to do it what are cells do in a split second to 4 seconds each. Each cell has FIVE information codes. The complexity goes beyond mathematical impossibilities by self assembling-by-chance. We are a creation.
Science supporting creationism ?
Please present any creation hypothesis which has passed SCIENTIFIC Peer Review & is now accepted as a SCIENTIFIC Theory.
@SmokiSounds Man, I love it when believers are pressed into the "have to make our story make sense" corner... it's ALWAYS "God is magic! He can do anything!"
They just hate the word "magic" of course, but let's call a spade a spade... MAGIC.
@graphicism "I find it hard to believe in Darwinian evolution" - We all have our own personal problems. You just found one of yours.... Yours to deal with, not anyone elses.
if you must reply to a comment online. think before you post. 3 comments that were half assed made me wonder how they were even conjured up. please read messages completely before replying
@IFE10M Yes we see evolution I'm not denying that, I'm saying Darwinian evolution lacks falls apart when we see multiple forms of symbiotic microbes forming at both the North and South pole that have never met but are genetically identical, when life forms in the vacuum of space or in the heat of volcanic lava.
Great video, thumbs up.
@RazielKain It might seem like that at first place, but its not necessarily true.
Organisms living in the open ocean have a similar setting, that being they don`t encounter significant environmental changes or pressures. don`t be fooled though, Evolution still occurs, just much slower. we cannot eliminate all environmental pressures, there will still always be pathogens and specific environmental factors we can`t protect ourselves against with certainty
Nicely made. Thanks.
@VirgilFoxMusic i think he means something like a geographical distancing or some catastrophe that separates large populations.
@goatjira
incomplete post. tell me how it is flawed. and remember, the "computer" was a metaphor cause ppl relate to computers easy on the net.
Having same genetic sequences in species and employing same enzymes to do similar work doesnt rule out the possibility of creationism.. It merely introduces the possibility of evolution.. It just means that the creater, whoever it may be, is either lazy to make different enzymes for different task, or lack creativity, or prefers to have a standardized and systematic construction of animal species using similar spare parts..
@teemuruskeepaa So are you arguing that calling multicellular life more complex is based only on a sociocultural construct? And where do cultures enter into this?
@mphmm Ahehehehehe sorry. I was actually using the word "marry" as a sort of pact or agreement between the persons to love each other and promise to up-bring their children to have the optimal chance for survival. During the course of the agreement, they constantly show and remind to each other why they loved him/her.
@Skindoggiedog
It's mostly all due to the fact that he's reading instead of actually telling it
@teemuruskeepaa Interesting points, I agree that they are not the best phrases to use, but how is this implying that we must do as our authorities tell us? It sounds more like your reading too much into this Please explain if i'm wrong.
@graphicism "Darwinian evolution would have you believe this process has stopped"
That's why the term "Darwinian evolution" is mostly used as a strawman, because Darwin made errors while the current evolutionary theory hasn't been falsified.
"We have rejected many of Darwin's [ideas] in the succeeding 150 years. Still the core remains." --John Hawks
"...I don't know any evolutionary biologists who call their field 'Darwinism'. They call it, well, 'evolutionary biology." --John Hawks
I love science.
@RobeonMew Here's an important difference: computers don't reproduce.
@TruthfulChristian RNA can code for proteins. RNA can go backwards into DNA with reverse transcriptase(HIV viruses do this).
now i understand what my high school teacher bored me to death with
@bengacris Yeah, I know that but I'm trying to figure out the point teemuruskeepaa is trying to make. As far as I can tell he argues that there is some kind of "worms are better than yeast which means some cultures are better than others" thing going on in the vid and I just don't see where.
look for "large numbers" and you will see that the number of atoms in the universe can be easily supassed by a simple probability question. @WhoisJacqueFresco
@graphicism "We are more genetically different from people of 5000 years ago than they were from Neanderthals."
Hmm, interesting. I'd never heard that before and assumed you were confused. I'm certainly no expert on paleoanthropology, so I am open to this possibility. Although you said 2000ya, and Hawks said 5000ya. For all I know, Hawks is correct. But while this might change what people think about our specific evolutionary history, I don't see how it would challenge evolutionary theory.
This video is amazing!
Is it so important to either believe in creatism or evolution to destroy the opposite's arguments no matter what?
Why not treat information as such and let each individual decide on their own what sounds more likely to them?
No matter what you say, it is not exactly open minded to reject any other theory of how life came to be just because you decide to believe in one of these theories.
As a matter of fact, science is build upon being open minded, not on rejecting ideas.
Keep it as that.
With advances being made in paleogenetics, it should be possible to find the most recent genetic changes that evolution has FIXED in the human genome. This should be of scientific benefit if such changes exist, and also of interest if they do not exist.
Let's make it simple: Does Santa Claus bring presents to children? You know the flying reindeer and chimney climbing in red suit stuff... Well, that is how important it is to understand things! We can stay children and talk hocus-pokus or we can grow up and understand our responsibility and possibilities.
More of this! Love it!
@SmokiSounds Oh, I think it was at least a 5th grade remark.
But now let's chat about what "I know nothing about"... would that be theology, my former job, or evolutionary biology, my current job? On which would you like to try your hand? Perhaps you can start with my "3rd grade comment"... explain why this statement is inaccurate.
And try to remain reasonable if at all possible.
@nobrainQQ You mean an equation? Please start listing off all of the protein combinations that can perform those functions. I don't need some bs equation based on nothing. Test every single combination out and get back to me.
Ugh, camels and pigs "ARE" closely related to hippos and whales as they are all artiodactyls. Whales and hippos are just more closely related to one another as either is to camels or pigs.
@teemuruskeepaa
the proper term is "better suited" which is to say it changes in such a way it will be able to get a little bit more of out the niche it is trying to fill.
Not so much in the sense of "well rats are better then mice, period"
does he say "created" at 1:03?
yes
Good video, but at ~ 1.07 he says 'new genes are created from more primitive forms in order to accomodate...', this is of course in error, evolution does not act with purpose. This is very sloppy language and it is all too common.
@TruthfulChristian
If you actually WATCHED these videos you're spamming your comments all over.
@HiAdrian We are already becoming significantly more intelligent through evolution speeding up at an exponential rate, even to a point now that our ancestors just 2,000 years ago are closer related to Homo neanderthalensis than we are related to our 2,000 year old relatives.
I find it hard to believe in Darwinian evolution.
Science!
Yes, Since humans are Apes, they are comfortable. Although other apes cannot walk so well, what is your point.
Fact: We have about 6 billion planetary systems in our galaxy
Fact: Billions of galaxies that make up the universe
"There are more possible proteins that can perform these functions than all atoms in the universe"
I smell bullshit...... Anything is possible, but seriously.... 3:44
I love common descent. I love natural selection. I love Evolution. Elegant yet simple yet mind boggling. I am teaching this stuff right now in Biology and of course, there is always a clown that brings up creation tales. Eventhough I warn them to keep their stories to themselves, unless they can support their claims via the scientific method, they keep trying to slide the fairytales into my lectures. Sad brainwashing at work.
@SmokiSounds Too bad creation and speaking words are both acts requiring (gasp) TIME.
well if life evolved naturally, why do some people think that life couldn't start naturally also? i mean do we need to have a god/gods behind everything we don't fully understand? that show how ignorant some people are. lol
@Zhylo
wow. assuming much? i am not siding with religions. READ MY POST AGAIN
@RazielKain See the movie Idiocracy and you'll see the future of our species...
WOW! The great German philosopher Nietzsche declared the death of God in the nineteenth century. I wonder what his response would be if he saw this.
It's Octopode.
Bravo.
@forest51690, I guess you missed the part where THE GENES WERE SUBSTITUTED AND FUNCTIONED EQUALLY AS WELL, and that THERE ARE ASTRONOMICALLY NUMEROUS VERSIONS OF CYTOCHROME-C THAT PERFORM THE SAME FUNCTION but which don't exist because the genes don't exist to produce those variations. These facts utterly destroy your argument. It is not because phenotype is similar, but because of evolution from common ancestors. Or a Prankster God created things to look exactly like evolution!
it seems odd that there is always evidence to back both sides of any argument (creation/evolution, God vs Mother Nature, a devine plan vs. chance ). Its almost like we humans are purposely being kept from the truth about our origins, how we should live our lives,and our ultimate destiny. We are always kept in a state of confusion and in a state of argument and are never allowed (by the powers that be) to come together as the Human Race and exist in a state of universal truth and harmony
@theshredator Genetically we are different.
"We are more genetically different from people of 5000 years ago than they were from Neanderthals.
John Hawks - University of Wisconsin anthropologist
@RobeonMew You do science studies ... why do I find it hard to believe that you you actually understand your studies, and are the studies proteomics or is it christian science?
awesome!
@RazielKain
you freaking read my mind... i've been thinking that for years!
@graphicism
Yeah thanks I have seen articles by John Hawks before. I just checked out your link and a more recent article on J.H. They made no mention of our relation to neanderthals nor of comparative studies between us and them. When he published the only studies on neanderthal dna were on mtDNA I think. In neither article did it suggest anything but accepted evolutionary processes are involved.
Thanks
Wow 4 thumbs down,pure ignorance. Turn off your computer, throw away your cell phone, you don't like science right.
@plevyman
fine. if you want to related to monkeys that badly.
but as the video guy himself even said. "common ancestor". so as the analogy of Computers go, they also stem from earlier forms. so in a way, computers are more than enough to use as an analogy. Asus and Acer are nowhere close to being related ans still older "designs" stem to them. so as many are rerlated in parts and "genes", they are still unique.
like i said. read the post carefully and maybe cross-reference b4 replying
no such thing as simple or not simple answxx, can answer anyx no matter what. ts not right or wrong.
@TheSpankymonkey So you unequivocally believe in Darwinism to the point it stops being a theory but a fact? Could this be blind fanatical Darwinian evolution at work?
@graphicism
Evolution is a FACT because we see it happening and have evidence of it happening in the past.
the THEORY of evolution explains HOW evolution happens.
This is the same for all science... just replace the word "evolution" with the word "gravity" and, bar some grammatical errors, that's how science deals with gravity.
The day another breeding group gains human like intelligence on this planet is going to be really awesome... I wonder what the bright line is though?
I love this stuff but hate the narrator
@Bosco239
Really? No shit...
schaade gute video -aber ich verstehe nicht"Nou Spick Inglisch-Eksküsmi"totzem +10!
@RobeonMew Seriously, asking me to read and cross-reference your barely intelligible posts is really pointless.
All living things reproduce. Humans aren't designed anew each time a baby is born - the blueprint already exists in the genetic code of its parents. It's a straightforward logical deduction that could be made by anyone with half a brain, that the pattern of common traits and genetic similarity in the tree of life indicates a pattern of relatedness and common ancestry.
@Desarollo lol are u joking?
@hilbert54 Not sure if I can post links but if the below link to the bbc website doesn't work google 'Human evolution is speeding up' or read the works of John Hawks.
news bbc co uk/2/hi/7132794 stm
@SmokiSounds Since your knowledge of scripture would fit neatly into a thimble, I'll pass you some easy stuff to explain (away) ...
Explain Zephaniah 3:6-10 using your "metaphor" and "father knows best" mentality. Oh, and be sure to toss in exactly how an all-knowing god would fail to know that his aforementioned actions would result in failure.
Oh, one more thing: Zephaniah is in the Old Testament, hence the missing red letters... heh...
God creates evolution.
@theshredator Yeah I was recalling from memory but still 5,000 years, that means our 3,000BC ancestors are genetically closer related to 40,000BC humans than present day 2000AD. Darwinian evolution would have you believe this process has stopped, the evidence that it's speeding up has more to do with the energy of the earth and our place in the galaxy than it is to natural selection. In other words life radiates from the earth and DNA builds what it thinks best for the current environment.
@PsyogiBottoms duh.. you present yourself to me very poorly.
Cats often kill each other with what is known as a killer bite to the spine.
This negates the only argument you present here.
Do you have a point or are you attempting to boost ego with insults?
If so then there are parallels in the animal kingdom for ritualized conflict scenarios which further degrade your position.
I recommend going to the newscientist site, for instance, so you can reference your position. learn something
@Desarollo If you're missing the point, you have a good reason. This video doesn't mention creationism, a commentator did. Yet equally your comment misses the point.
But I don't want to be boring: If you need a prayer answered to relate to this video then this means the word of the god your pray to is invalid as this god in his book already clearly states where our DNA come from. Mud and rib.
So you will be praying to god to change his mind ...
Good luck though :D
@omnimon3000 *implying that you need to marry someone to have a child*
@Spinalcord6666 Or 10.
@SmokiSounds WRONG. That's your total and unexcused ignorance speaking. What the BB states is that the universe was densely compressed; i.e. that matter and energy was ALWAYS present (first law). This says NOTHING of time; and we know that time is relative thanks to Einstein, so time may have been different but never "created". Get it?
In other words, "Matter existed." Period. Science makes NO other assertions.
Probably not.