HUGELY IMPROVED Could US Stealth Aircraft Operate In Ukraine With Impunity? (WarGames 46b) | DCS
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ค. 2024
- GRIM REAPERS 2 (TH-cam): / @grimreapers2
PATREON: / grimreapers
0:00 Overview
0:51 How We Have Fixed The Modern Aircraft
4:20 Testing AIM-120D vs R-77-1
6:41 Battle Details
11:41 Predictions
12:13 Take Off
15:37 Refuelling
27:25 Combat
45:02 Tactical Replay
Ukraine-Russia Series:
Ukraine Using Hellfire Missile?: • Could Ukrainian Jets U...
US Harpoons vs Russian Navy: • Could Ukrainian Migs H...
Ukraine Using APKWS?: • Could Ukrainian Mi-17s...
Ukraine US HARMs vs Russian S-400: • Is Ukraine Hitting Rus...
Patriot/NASAMS vs Supersonic Missiles: • Video
Fulcrum/Flanker vs Foxbat/Super Flanker: • Mig-29 & Su-27 vs Su-3...
NASAMS vs Russian Cruise Missiles: • Could US-Supplied NASA...
Russian KH-47M2 vs Polish Air Force: • Could Russian Air-Laun...
Su-27 & Drone vs Snake Island: • Could Ukrainian Su-27s...
Su-25s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: • Could Su-25s Penetrate...
NATO Eurofighters vs Crimean AWACS: • Could NATO Eurofighter...
Patriot, Gepard & Gripen vs KH-65: • Could Patriot, Gepard ...
A-10s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: • Could A-10s Penetrate ...
USN Tomahawk Strike Kerch Bridge: • Could Russian Su-35, S...
USAF Stealth Strike Kerch Bridge: • Could USAF Strike Pene...
Ukrainian Jets Strike Kerch Bridge: • Could Ukrainian Jets P...
F-22 Raptors vs Russian Fighters: • Could F-22 Raptors Dom...
Raptor/Eagle vs Super Flanker: • F-22 Raptor & F-15 Eag...
USAF Bombers vs Mariupol Defenses: • Which Aircraft Can Pen...
Ukraine Bombs Snake Island: • 2022 Ukrainian Su-27 F...
Stealth Fighters vs Russian Bombers: • Could USA Operate Stea...
Sinking Of Moskva #3: • Why The Moskva's Radar...
Sinking Of Moskva #2: • Ex-US Navy Guys Specul...
Sinking Of Moskva #1: • How Well Defended Was ...
Russia Nukes Britain: • Could Britain Be Defen...
Ukraine Uses Danish F-16s: • If Denmark Loaned F-16...
Ukraine Uses Polish Mig-29s: • If Poland Loaned Mig-2...
Russian-Britain Missile Attack: • Could Britain Survive ...
Ghost Of Kyiv: • The Ghost Of Kyiv Comm...
Belgorod Raid: • Belgorod Raid: Could A...
Eurofighter/Fulcrum vs Super Flanker: • Eurofighter Typhoon & ...
US Strike vs Odessa • Could A Coordinated US...
Russian Helo Rocket Lob: • Can Helicopters Really...
Russian Su-25 vs US Patriot SAM: • Could Russian Su-25s O...
Understanding Russian SAMs: • Explained: Russian SAM...
Ukrainian Jets Road Operations: • Could Su-27, Mig-29A O...
Russian 40 Mile Convoy: • Could FA-18, A-10 Or B...
Flanker vs Super Flanker: • Ukrainian Su-27 Flanke...
USEFUL LINKS
GRIM REAPERS (TH-cam): / @grimreapers
GRIM REAPERS 2 (TH-cam): / @grimreapers2
GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
DCS BUYERS GUIDE: • DCS World Module Quick...
DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
SOCIAL MEDIA
WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
TWITTER: / grimreapers_
DISCORD(DCS & IL-2): / discord (16+ age limit)
DISCORD(TFA Arma): discordapp.com/invite/MSYJxbM (16+ age limit)
OTHER
CAP'S X-56 HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/open?id=1g7o...
CAP'S WINWING HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/drive/folder...
THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
#WarGames #GRWarGames #Russia #Ukraine #USA #F22 #Raptor #Stealth #F35 #Su53 #DCSQuestioned #GR #DCSWorld #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #Military - เกม
![แขกคนแรกร้านแจ๊ส [ซี - เอมมี่] | iJazzKhunJang](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XP6C9kulFfc/mqdefault.jpg)
Ukraine-Russia Series:
Ukraine Using Hellfire Missile?: th-cam.com/video/s_1YHDTmPPw/w-d-xo.html
US Harpoons vs Russian Navy: th-cam.com/video/Oiee83CWRcE/w-d-xo.html
Ukraine Using APKWS?: th-cam.com/video/FBxV9YuAfaw/w-d-xo.html
Ukraine US HARMs vs Russian S-400: th-cam.com/video/eSyEOXsjWo8/w-d-xo.html
Patriot/NASAMS vs Supersonic Missiles: th-cam.com/video/i1q7uDeinA4/w-d-xo.html
Fulcrum/Flanker vs Foxbat/Super Flanker: th-cam.com/video/BhXfxc94JAU/w-d-xo.html
NASAMS vs Russian Cruise Missiles: th-cam.com/video/pJI_b95jzpk/w-d-xo.html
Russian KH-47M2 vs Polish Air Force: th-cam.com/video/cnrVxqL5q9w/w-d-xo.html
Su-27 & Drone vs Snake Island: th-cam.com/video/T_oRoU2Ayfo/w-d-xo.html
Su-25s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: th-cam.com/video/ryV65bUJzrw/w-d-xo.html
NATO Eurofighters vs Crimean AWACS: th-cam.com/video/EiJ2dFRh95g/w-d-xo.html
Patriot, Gepard & Gripen vs KH-65: th-cam.com/video/ZhxdrNjig1g/w-d-xo.html
A-10s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: th-cam.com/video/B0tZoo0uLh4/w-d-xo.html
USN Tomahawk Strike Kerch Bridge: th-cam.com/video/0vpi8xBygV8/w-d-xo.html
USAF Stealth Strike Kerch Bridge: th-cam.com/video/IJbf9Bcxnw0/w-d-xo.html
Ukrainian Jets Strike Kerch Bridge: th-cam.com/video/I8FumuZReB4/w-d-xo.html
F-22 Raptors vs Russian Fighters: th-cam.com/video/ComRcmrwJWk/w-d-xo.html
Raptor/Eagle vs Super Flanker: th-cam.com/video/keqYmuSEo-8/w-d-xo.html
USAF Bombers vs Mariupol Defenses: th-cam.com/video/aCsboOG0QU4/w-d-xo.html
Ukraine Bombs Snake Island: th-cam.com/video/BX696MKdkb8/w-d-xo.html
Stealth Fighters vs Russian Bombers: th-cam.com/video/rym90jnQDsA/w-d-xo.html
Sinking Of Moskva #3: th-cam.com/video/NIjoyIieOzY/w-d-xo.html
Sinking Of Moskva #2: th-cam.com/video/snjfbj_EwW4/w-d-xo.html
Sinking Of Moskva #1: th-cam.com/video/Bxwh6MGLJNc/w-d-xo.html
Russia Nukes Britain: th-cam.com/video/rzk45RFQwA8/w-d-xo.html
Ukraine Uses Danish F-16s: th-cam.com/video/17Pikrp0QaY/w-d-xo.html
Ukraine Uses Polish Mig-29s: th-cam.com/video/zCi4tAIzuOU/w-d-xo.html
Russian-Britain Missile Attack: th-cam.com/video/zwIGfabvzHA/w-d-xo.html
Ghost Of Kyiv: th-cam.com/video/Yrct8V4n1-U/w-d-xo.html
Belgorod Raid: th-cam.com/video/mQykTxt6ftw/w-d-xo.html
Eurofighter/Fulcrum vs Super Flanker: th-cam.com/video/MPyIipEhgR0/w-d-xo.html
US Strike vs Odessa th-cam.com/video/KeiOHgzic6Y/w-d-xo.html
Russian Helo Rocket Lob: th-cam.com/video/118GgGnP_sM/w-d-xo.html
Russian Su-25 vs US Patriot SAM: th-cam.com/video/asp69ZD_tO0/w-d-xo.html
Understanding Russian SAMs: th-cam.com/video/R4xTxLNZXcw/w-d-xo.html
Ukrainian Jets Road Operations: th-cam.com/video/hBpzQhinPbw/w-d-xo.html
Russian 40 Mile Convoy: th-cam.com/video/Vr_-2FLblBk/w-d-xo.html
Flanker vs Super Flanker: th-cam.com/video/VOAuOFLJGk4/w-d-xo.html
WRT su57 in Ukraine war, I can tell you with absolute certainty they are not flying in Ukraine. If they were, the Ukrainians would have been shooting them down already.
Does anyone really believe the SU57 will live up to any of the hype? I think we all know it's going to turn out to have the stealth of an a10, the real world performance of (maybe) an su35, and be flown and maintained by people who do not want to be there, and who work in a military that exists to facilitate corruption, with fighting a war way further down the list well past parades and job creation. Furthermore, those pilots and mechanics arent even getting the fruits of that corruption, but are just the ones getting shot at.
SU-57 is definitely in between true stealth and low observability, you can see clearly where they lack full RAM coating on leading wing edges. Russia has nowhere near the money to maintain stealth planes let alone build a fleet of low observablility aircraft
The Felon is a hype job , much like the Checkmate and Berkut . I have heard that the Felon's RCS is above the Flanker in the above 30° , below 20° . Remember aircraft like the Forger and Russian naval ships like the Moskva , everyone really needs to be questioning actual Russian numbers and claims . 2 Russian hypersonic missiles were found washed-up on shore and are now in NATO hands , turns out travelling distances over 100nm is a problem and the missile has a good chance of simply falling , they do not like travelling at that high speed over any real distance .
The reason there’s no RAM on the leading edges is because there are radar antennae on the wing leading edges. It’s not like they could only afford RAM for 98% of the plane, and they built half a dozen planes.
They only have a handful of SU-57s anyway. It's largely a non-factor.
su 57 is propaganda flanker that looks 5th gen its basically flying t14 armata serves absolutely same purpose
But still, you have to admit it is one of the most beautiful planes around, about Berkut - it turned out to be too expensive for mass production (Around 350 mln Euro)
Lol finally after a year of watching this channel I get to see the f-22 and f-35 operating as they would in real life. Absolutely fantastic. Its always been silly to me that a modern trillion dollar plane could be bested by something that was built when the berlin wall was still up but obviously thats no more. Please make more videos with the accurately modeled stealths
Now I want to see The F-15EX Eagle II and F-22 Raptor working together as intended!👍
i know im gonna sound like that guy, but the f15 program was just as expensive as the f35 program the only reason the f35 is called trillion dollar plane is because it takes over 2000 aircraft the maintenance the crew and engineers salary and other stuff for like the next 30 years. if you do that for any other high end military program you will get that sort of cost.
@@yujinhikita5611 Oh I dont mean it in a negative way. I just more thought it was ridiculous that DCS doesnt take into account how these planes actually perform. Granted the true specs of these planes are highly classified Im sure we at least know enough information about these planesto understand that even super flankers and in my opinion the felon would be all but helpless in a conflict against the f-22 and f-35
@@painedkillerk9 oh yeah i got no problem about that side. i agree the performance on the f22 and f35 are way better in real life, but lots of the things that make them so arent based on things dcs can do right now unfortunately.
US stealth bombers were shot down with 1970s soviet sams in yugoslavia. I've never came across anything in history to judge an f22 or even an f35 capabilities. I read that the US is already looking for a new generation jet already which suggests that the f22 and 35 is not the unmatched ruler of the skies
36:18
"Nearly a clean sheet guys, nearly unheard of for GR"
* says Cap as he nearly flies an F-22 into the ground *
Should probably have cut that out...
Something in the series has recently become a format: we shoot at bots that have exposure warning system, but they fly at maximum speed in order to dodge at the last moment and crash!
It would be possible to break people into teams: half stupid NPCs, half people with brains who can adapt to the style of combat (PVE with PVP elements, as it was in fleet battles)!
the issue then is opsec.
The Bomber would never know, that it is potentially under attak from 5th gen fighters.
Only from Manpads (witch there aren't any here), Ukraenian Fighters etc
@@patricktho6546
@@patricktho6546
They still can't figure out how stealth works. The radar cross section is no bigger than a large bird. On an F-35 and F-22. It's doubtful the radar aboard any Russian or Chinese aircraft, even at very close ranges.
@@patricktho6546 if no one aims at him, then yes, and if he launches a missile (with an active radio beam guidance head) at the su-35, then the radiation warning system should notify the pilot! Also, the f-35 is not visible from the point of view of its exposure to third-party radars, but if its radar is turned on, then it can be tracked (not aim with a rocket, but track its position!)!
The F-35 has the DAS which. ..... I _think_ ..... stands for Distributed Aperture System (if that is wrong someone tell me). It's probably what they were talking about; the pilot wears a helmet customized to his/her head proportions. There is a HUD built in which comes from sensors mounted around the aircraft, so the pilot can use DAS to see through the cockpit floor or look around in a full 360° view. The jet does have AESA as well, but the pilot sees most stuff on the DAS HUD. What doesn't go to DAS goes to the big touch screen 'instrument panel.' With all that, the pilot of a F-35 has a sort of 'God's Eye' view.
Both the F-22 and the F-35 have DAS, and don't worry, you got the name right. Bear in mind that your description is a little off, though it is not by much.
The helmet has been customized for each pilot for since the days of the F-4, and the same goes for the mask. Granted, the customization goes even deeper now due to the HMD (helmet-mounted display), though the HUD (heads-up display) is still present and displays all of the same information as before, at least for the F-22. What the HMD displays is much simpler and less filled in information than the HUD, but yes, it can function as a 360° viewer and targeting system.
However, what the HMD displays from the DAS is only what was processed by the avionics. There is no 360° camera feed, as that is an rather extreme amount of data to process into something that can be described as a virtual window (and setting up onboard 360° cameras that do not breach stealth is still elusive right now). The most you would see is the targeting box that you should already be familiar with from the HUD. So if the enemy has good-enough stealth, the DAS might not be able to pick them out, especially if their detection remains mostly if not entirely passive.
So the DAS HMD will give a sort-of "God's Eye" view like you said, but another thing to bear in mind is that the bulk of the data that goes into the HMD, specifically the data that does not pertain to the plane itself, will come via datalinks from AWACS and satellite feeds. Theoretically, F-22 and F-35 datalinks could build a decent picture between each other's AESAs if there is no other support, but they still can't compete with what an AWACS or satellite can provide.
It would probably be more accurate to call it a "Demigod's Eye" view, but that is also probably being pedantic.
@@DavidRichardson153 Data from AWACS feed into the F35 and is overlaid onto the HMD, as well as HUD. The DAS provides virtually real time 360 view to the pilot from the cockpit, not counting shared PIP, thermal, etc. views from other linked HDMs. There's 6+ IR cams that provide AR so they can actually see through the cockpit, I worked on this project. We also track pupil orientation so the HDM displays data in the correct orientation as well. If I look down, I see the ground in our helmets. Perhaps you're referring to an older gen.
@@aandrews7635 The AWACS data feed was the most obvious. A massive plane (at least when compared to the typical sizes of fighters) whose sole job is to electronically monitor and track everything is going to provide much more data, raw and especially processed, than a bunch of fighters and multiroles, as it is kind of implied with its name. I did say that theoretically, the fighters and multiroles could substitute for the role of the AWACS for the data feed but only to a degree. I threw in the satellites because they all have links to them, with communications and GPS being the most apparent, and the data from the satellite links would undoubtedly be integrated, even if they are ultimately overshadowed by the rest of the data.
Granted, I probably was thinking of an older gen, and hardly any tech, if any at all, would stay just as it is across generations. Pupil tracking was certainly not in what I knew of, which was admittedly outdated, but I also knew then that it was in the works, so if it was not already included by now, it would be sometime soon.
From the sounds of it, it almost seems as though they might start getting rid of the transparent canopy and just going with virtual windows in future generations. Probably a little too sci-fi here, but so was hypersonic flight for a time, so anything could go.
youre nailing it cap quality has gone up so much... amazing work
I was just thinking this. The channel has jumped from "VR paladin laugh" to tactically sound thought processes in like... a year.
Thanks! It's taken 7 years, but finally getting there :)
This really highlights the probable results of the stealth advantage currently. Red Flag type results. At least two tankers next time for your own sanity. Enjoyed !
Oh grump, “I’m the biggest queen here!!” Freaking killed me.
Violet was suspiciously quiet during all the “questionable” jokes haha
nah Vilolet gets pretty witty off cam but she picks up on when me and damp and grump get rolling she just lets us do our thing, and we always enjoy it when she joins us
Haha I figured. You guys had me busting up during all that back and forth. 🤣
It's always interesting - the whole fixing little inaccuracies like missile range and what not, can make some huge differences in the scenarios. They've come a long, long ways from slider bars with basically 'handicap' or difficulty scales. Which is something we've likely realized in practice in the last few years, there are real handicaps - command structure lag etc- that will cripple what is supposed to be a system with a certain effectiveness - into one with a substantially lower effect. That's kind of hard to model though without introducing a bit of random number generation with response times vs a target, whether a unit is actually on, or whether it actually works when otherwise everything else went to plan
The depths Damp will sink to were fully on show. The double entendre flowed quite merrily. Although he ought to take lessons from Frankie Howerd on timing. A few basic errors 'slipped' through.
Simba was an impressive commanding officer for the Fat Amy's. Promotion now feels inevitable to Master Sergeant.... If he can stay sober and out of Damp's gutter he will go far. Minor lapses under Damp's influence withstanding he is an outstanding member of the team.
Cap is turning into a software engineer, a career no-one, including Cap, foresaw. At this rate we will lose him to BAe missile division. Within 5 years he will design the Meteor II. It will reach mach 10 in stealth configuration with a reach of 250 miles. As a result will receive a knighthood for single handedly neutralising the Russian airforce.
King Charles III Congratulates him for his supper massive pole.
Unfortunately today Grump was rather muted. Possibly due to attacking his former homeland and potentially close relatives. It brought new feeling to the term blue on blue or in this case Grumptastic on Grumpnicki. And no one wants to see fratricide.
Your friendly F22 pilot here with some inputs on flying the raptor (sorry it’s the instructor pilot in me) take it or leave it but it’ll help you guys tactically;
1. Assuming the F22 RCS is modeled somewhat correctly…. F22 doesn’t “notch”…. In fact, there is no notch when fighting AESA radars…. F22 you shoot at shot range, when active execute an out maneuver and turn cold. NO AB, Mil power 5-10 def nose low.
2. No need for AB on takeoff for either the F22 or F35… save gas.
3. F22 fly Line abreast 15-20NM apart at 0.9 IMN (fuel efficiency).
4. Call “Commit” when leading edge is within 80nm to F22. Max AB to 1.2 IMN then Mil power and climb holding 1.2 IMN…. At shot range with nose above horizon you’ll get the best WEZ.
4. Targeting priorities: Side, High, Fast, leading edge…. 1 missile per Bandit (shoot- assess - shoot)
5. At 80 NM commit if red range presentation turn #3&4 Cold via a “raptor 3&4 pump Left/right”… cold element continues 0.9 IMN level turn to Cold while monitoring hit element targeting.
6. After hot element “raptor 1 active, raptor 2 active” (you don’t make these calls in real life…) call “raptor 1 & 2 out Left/Right”…. Mil power 5-10 def nose low….continue “grinder” until red range presentation dies/manuevers to an azimuth presentation.
7. once Red azimuth…. Reform the 4 ship to Line abreast and either “banzai” = commit to merge or Continue launch and leave.
8. Banzai when (not all inclusive) 1:3 ratio achieved and weapons do to so (1 X F22 against 3 red). Weapons include 120 and or 9x.
You guys do a great job and make me laugh… love watching. Try a few of these real tactics and you’ll see an increase in kills and decrease in death…
Hey Cap, with all these excellent fixes to these mods you guys are pushing out at the moment, is there any chance you’d be able to re-release them in their fixed states? I personally use all these mods myself and seeing you guys do away with the stuff that frustrates me all the time is pretty awesome.
Cheers!
yes BUT it's more complex than it seems. Currently we have just modded other people's mods. Can't release modified versions of other people mods, that's not on. Will only be able to share publicly when we figure out how to separate these GR things into a completely stand-alone package that we can share. Make sense? Will take quite a long time. Haven't figured out how to do it yet.
@@grimreapers yeah thought that would be an issue - I suppose approaching the modders and asking to release it giving full credit to them would probably be impossible as well. Ah well best of luck in getting it all worked out, I’m sure you’ll all get it done.
@@grimreapers Why can't you release the modified versions as long as you get permission from the original creators?
@@grimreapers That's considerate Cap, but standard practice is to ask for forgiveness, not permission, and throw in a "Sir." at the end for good measure.
@@grimreapers Would it be feasible to approach the original modders and see if they are willing to update their mods?
I love when you get Simba, Grump and Sock in the same video!
i like to call us triple trouble.
When they get together things get a little blue...
GRadar is drastically efficient by defense contractor standards.
You should drag it out for 8 years 🤣
‘There is a slight problem. Sometimes…….we blow ourselves up’ ! 😂😂😂 Cap’s understated British wit.
Fantastic job on the radar and missles! Great mission as well! Well done!!!
🤣 Simba telling cap to just relax and take it
sometimes you just have to calm cap down. hahaha
The main issue with the SU-57 is there are only 10-12 of them in existence(all prototypes as the only serial production Su-57 crashed on it's maiden flight), and none have ever seen combat. One thing we do know is they wanted the Felon to have the latest Izdeliye-30 engines, but it appears there was trouble with the fit and designers had to fall back on the older Saturn AL-41F1 which gives it a massive infrared signature. Defeating detection and weapons lock isn't just about radar. It's also about infrared heat signature and the 4th-generation engines designed for non-stealth aircraft employed in the Su-57 aren't good at masking either as the F-22's in Syria saw the few SU-57's Russia was testing there both on infrared and radar. And as far as stealth, as far as we can tell it is not as stealthy as the F-35, but Sukhoi wasn't aiming for that, Instead they're just trying to make the Su-57 a sneaky and capable fighter with bombing capabilities. India was partnered with Russia in 2007 to develop what would become the SU-57 but pulled out in 2018 do to rumors "the fighter it produced simply wasn't stealthy enough to survive in highly contested airspace". But in the end, any and all breakdown of the Su-57's capabilities should be taken with a grain of salt, as there just isn't enough real world data.
Sources:
"While they were intended to field an advanced engine system designed specifically for the aircraft’s stealth role, delays in the engine’s development have hindered progress. It’s now expected that each Su-57 delivered to the Russian Air Force for the foreseeable future will come fitted with the Saturn AL-41F1 engine" ~Sandboxx June 3, 2021
"Rather than relying on stealth, a field of technology in which the Russians may be lagging behind, Sukhoi has incorporated stealth into the design of an otherwise capable platform, producing a fighter that may not be sneakier than an F-35 but remains sneaky enough to cause some real problems for opponents, even if only on the drawing board." ~Steve Trimble Aviation Expert and Defense Editor for Aviation Week Jun 9, 2021
"Rumors swirled that India had given up the PAK FA program because the fighter it produced simply wasn't stealthy enough to survive in highly contested airspace" ~Business Insider Jun 9, 2021
Just in awe of how talented your whole team is. Very cool.
I don’t know what I enjoy more. These crazy missions or all of you yapping at each other. Great job.
Stealth fighter radio chatter:
“My canopy is cooler than yours”
“Naw, mine’s cooler.”
Ok but that collective take off was one of the coolest things I’ve ever seen
Great jobs with the videos, especially with the recent mods. The Valued Viewers do appreciate the legwork.
With these mods, I think you're pretty close to being able to make some pretty exciting modern China vs. Russia fights. Historically, they've spent more time fighting each other than the west so... any chance of those videos in the near future?
Working on it. Main problem now is "mod conflicts". Some mods just not working together. Takes ages to work the problem.
They really should do this. Commie infighting is almost a meme.
I've really started to love this channel!
Hell yeah you have The Grinnelli F-22 Raptor now!!👍👍
Now you can do this request🙏
Grinnelli F-22 Raptor and F-15EX Eagle II VS Eighteen North Korean MIG-29's BVR!
F-22 flys 100 miles ahead of The F-15EX and begins engaging bandits while F-15EX burns forward joining the fight with TONS of AIM-120D's!!😁✌
SU-57 is considered low observable like The Typhoon but slightly better certainly not as stealthy as an F-35 or F-22
Lovin' it! Thanks GR :)
Very awesome fight! Thanks for the video.
Thank you for making these videos!
I absolutely can’t get enough of watching u guys, U do a fantastic job.❤
Awesome work Cap!
Can you imagine how pissed Russia would be if we actually did stuff like this.
Nuclear deterrent works i guess
@@user-A1A1 maybe. The whole point of this was to shoot down Russian jets and not get caught.
@@shaunkelly9053 yeah real high risk for medium reward
@@user-A1A1 No question about it. Russia would be far more willing to use nuclear weapons than the U.S. would be. They have to be more willing to. Their conventional military forces are aligned against an entire massive military alliance including the country having spent more on the military than the top 12 or more countries behind it for decades running. You're right. Russia would be far more willing to use nukes than the U.S. would because it has to maintain that posture and mentality. Nuclear deterrence works.
@@user-A1A1 I'll add this: Any preemptive nuclear strike on Russia using stealth means will automatically trigger the Russian Parimeter Dead Hand system and ICBMs will launch. This is why the West knows that if they want to sack Russia, it has to be done internally with a color revolution, but Russia is also aware of this and will never permit for it to occur.
Hope in the future you can simulate data linking and have the stealth planes be able to use planes like F-15's with full load of missiles or bombs to be flying ammunition platforms for the stealth planes to link to and fire from at targets.
Hey cap, could you do a scenario of the of Samar? It would be a verses battle between the Japanese 4 battleships, 6 heavy cruisers, 2 light cruisers, and 11 destroyers, and the ragtag Americans 3 destroyers, 4 destroyer escorts, and 6 escort carriers, along with 300-400 planes which have very limited, to no anti ship ordinance (basically just torpedoes, and a random assortment of other weapons). I think it would be a very cool scenario for the grim reapers to try.
If you want a great overview of the real battle, drachinifel has a great video on it here m.th-cam.com/video/4AdcvDiA3lE/w-d-xo.html, and a video by battleship be jersey’s channel here: m.th-cam.com/video/RT6YLXuvJw0/w-d-xo.html
@@silas4lagoon776 Seconding the video, utterly fantastic work!
i would like to see a usa vs china naval battle but with 2-2 carriers
There's a couple of those battles on here...click the Naval Battles section.
@@willwozniak2826 yeah ik but with 2 carriers
I want to see Russia's aircraft carrier and it's tugboat vs the USS George Washington
Ye but the western carriers are a British and American ones
What about China and US v UK and Russia, 2 v 2? Mix up those techs.
So well executed. Clean sheet!
Great fun ! Sorry to have to say though @ mach 2 the R.A.M. on a stealth would be ruined\destroyed. Unbelievable but true, R.A.M. can't handle temps above 450 fahrenheit and the skin gets much hotter (up to over 1000 degrees) due to atmospheric friction. They're working on a new ceramic based R.A.M. that can handle temps over 3000 degrees but it's not in use yet.
Yeah, Cap usually mentions this in most videos, guess he forgot or it was cut out in this video.
Agree BUT that is not modelled in game.
And we don't know if they've fixed the hot spot towards the rear of the F-22 fuselage where it starts ungluing itself at sustained supercruise.
I like watching your sim's it very eye opening and informative. That said, your sense of humor is very entertaining as well. Keep up the great work.
Great flying guy's. No glitches and lot's of Boom.
Every time I watch one of these videos I really do feel like a viewer that is highly valued. Not sure why, but I appreciate the sentiment.
Edited to add: one missing aspect of this redesign that I'm not sure you could ever properly model is the F-35 radar system is also a VERY capable electronic warfare system. It can do a lot to degrade enemy radar, weapon guidance links, even radio coms can be attacked. And because it's frequency agile and has multiple emitters it's also a very low probability of intercept system that is difficult for enemy RWR or ELINT systems to detect. These features also make it extremely difficult to jam without broad spectrum barrage jamming.
Good job!
You guys are awesome!
Outstanding !
Cap, if you (or whoever edits these files for you) could make a video on the basics of editing .lua files (RCS, radar, missile performance [seeker head, kinetics, etc] and the like) that would be awesome. I think a lot of people would like to know how to do this to make their SP performance more enjoyable. Id like to make the F-35 comparable to yours, I’d also like to fix the AIM-120D’s and a few other missiles performances.
Great video as always.
Will do but not until we are better. Currently VERY ugly.
Just found out you have a Patreon (after months of watching), Just signed up - Thank you for all you do!! (PS. You need to promote your Patreon more often :)
Thx Dex
I had assumed that there were problems with the models due to the uncharacteristic behaviors. Thanks for getting things fixed up.
Awesome stuff
Eagle Dynamics/DCS released its first game in 1995. Oddly, the theater of operations was in Crimea.
I cast this video on my dad's big screen TV and he said you guys sounded like real pilots talking smack to each other 😂😂😂
Excellent, thanks for staying with it until you got everything worked out.
Nice work
Love how, you are "Apolitical", but still negotiate aggressively.
The inflight refuel innuendo was top notch. 😂
Oops I forgot....a great episode. Thanks guys.
We've got to start a book of Damp quotes; 'You cant say no through a gag', ' One Possum in the moon light', etc etc. Classic.
Damn - that was an epic take off sequence. Very cool. Very cool indeed.
You rock Capt! Damp has the humour of a Brit for sure.
Good job....funny as hell🤣
I could just barely let the kids watch this channel but after that Bukakke comments etc from that drunk sounding American Captain I just cant. 😁😁❤️❤️
Your Raptor pilot here answering the RCS modeling question…. Obviously the real # is classified along w the signature… if you use 0.003 MS you’ll be kinda close (there’s a lot that goes into it)… can you model different RCS for different quadrants of the F22? Recommend the same for F35. Nice work!
I was a boom operator on 135s and I may have said suggestive things to pilots through the boom interphone system.
Great stuff! Ideas for future videos possibly. Any scenario: Russian alliances crumble... so Russia vs China, Russia vs North Korea. Chinese aggression China vs India, China vs Pakistan. Also a Russian invasion of Northern Japan with an alternative with it being combined with a Chinese invasion of the South!
Russia V China would be cool
Awesome job on the upgrades! I wonder if it is possible to build a What If on the Super Tomcat 21 vs the Super Hornet. I have always wonder if the Navy chose correctly when picking the Super Hornet over the Super Tomcat.
I've often wondered the same thing as far as building a mod goes. I'd love to see the ASF-14 in game. I've never wondered, however, if the Navy picked the right aircraft. I know they didn't.
I want the super tomcat.
Great effing work people.
I kept seeing the opening to “Dr Strangelove” during poor Cap’s refueling.
"Are we not going to Orlando?"
I work in Orlando and.... Okay, fair. LOL.
Grump should fly inverted under Cap, while Cap is trying to refuel...😁😝
no thanks!
@@grimreapers
Where's your sense of adventure?...lol
"Sorry we didn't know it was invisible" comes to mind 😬🤣
FYI for anyone who doesn't know the story, stealth wasn't really defeated, it was routine and not changing it because of the false sense of security that stealth tech gave that caused it to be downed.
It's a feat that's never been repeated since
@@mor4y Not to mention a spy in Italy passed on info on when the jet launched allowing the missile operator a chance to figure out when the F-117 would be over target, there were no jamming aircraft available at the time, and the radar lock only occurred after the bomb bay doors were open.
Cheers Cap
If it wasn't for this channel, I'd actually have to spend more time working. Thank goodness for you guys! I'll be flying DCS soon. All the gear is here woo hoo!
exxxxcellent
@@garymyers6638 Just so my boss doesn't "release the hounds" LOL (I work from home and he's 1000 miles away... no worries)
You’ll be a recruit for GR in no time. 🛩
You need to be fired for wasting company time.
This was awesome, really cool to see an operation where all aircraft network and communicate through shared information.
I was surprised to see flying so close to the deck though. I know I’m nitpicking and this is DCS, not reality, but It seems like you’d want to stay high to act with impunity in this age of everyone having high quality cameras in their pocket.
You all would fit in nicely on an 0311 Marine road trip. FACs rock.
One issue that could ruin impunity would be low flying that could be filmed by civilians on the ground. We've already seen footage from Ukraine of aerial combat so that could expose US pilots.
Yup this is so true.
Love the refueling banter
Nice proof of concept.
That commentary, LOL!
Whoop, ‘invisible planes’, they sent Wonder Woman!!!
I just got a new vkb evo and im trying to set up the POV mini stick as mini mouse but when i do that it removes the function for a hat and Pov. i currently dont have head tracking so i need it to look around. anybody got a solution?
Man I wish more people would fly the f-35 it’s beautiful in my opinion
@Grim Reapers There's a leaked document floating around that is apparently Sukhoi's patent application for the Su-57. They list the RCS of the Su-57 as between 0.1m2 and 1m2 in that document. That's basically the same RCS as a clean Super Hornet/Gripen/Typhoon. That's where the "Su-57 has the same RCS as a Super Hornet" thing came from. This is probably pretty accurate, as Russia likely doesn't actually have the tech it needs to build a true stealth aircraft, and there are several design flaws in the Su-57 that hurt its ability to be a stealthy aircraft, such as the lack of an S-bend in the air intakes, which leaves the fan blades of its engines exposed. So if GR is making an accurate Su-57 mod, then it's RCS should be set, at smallest, to 0.1m2.
How you know they dont have the tech? Su 47 was stealth aircraft witch su57 based. And reports says in syria su35 radar detect a f22 so.... this is simulator game but not officiall mods. Mods are inaccurate. Thats why f22 is still mod and not officiall dcs plane.
@@alekosalekadis6095 how do I know they don't have the tech? Two reasons, 1) Russia is way behind the US in almost every technical field, and especially in stealth tech because of reason 2) the US spent literally decades developing stealth technology under top secret conditions. There's no evidence Russia has spent any time developing stealth technology until the Su-57, and no evidence they hacked top secret American data gain the ability to build their stealth jet like the Chinese did. Also, the Su-47 is not in any way a stealth jet. It was a technology demonstrator that was a testbed for new technologies (to the Russians) like fly-by-wire controls. All you have to do is look at the jet and you'll see bumps and protrusions everywhere, as well as hemispherical air intakes which massively increase its RCS. It wasn't a stealth aircraft and was never meant to be one. Also, it had forward swept wings. The Su-57 incorporates a few technologies the Su-47 pioneered, but the Su-57 is not at all based on the Su-47, it's based on the Su-35.
Claims that an Su-35 picked up an F-22 on radar are suspect, because the Russian government is known to lie. But let's say it happened. How close were the two aircraft? Did the F-22 have it's Luneberg lens mounted so it could be picked up for deconfliction purposes, as they often do? These are important things to know when we talk about seeing a stealth aircraft on radar. Regardless, I can't find any reports about a Russian jet detecting an F-22 on radar. The Russian government claims the Su-35 can detect stealth aircraft, but they claim a lot of things that aren't true.
The F-35 and F-22 used in this video looks absolutely beautiful
most DOD official statements regarding SU57 suggest F18 super hornet level of stealth. of course there are many many sources, weeding thru them is more of, how far do you want to go. if there was a way to model two of them with the true stealth and super hornet level stealth, that would make for interesting variable encounters.
Nice
Btw, have you guys tried "mod enchancement mod" for Grinelli´s F-22? (has even been updated just in september!) Makes a lot of more information for screens, makes em just littlebit blurrier, and the price is losing carfield, and possible "tint tweaks" has to be done by hand, but its totally worth it I think.. And btw has some updates for aim-120D´s (+AIM9X-3..). What kind of weapons pack is in use here?
Ok. It has too much power. Or what do I know. But seems so. Mach 2, 40 000 ft (or more) in 2-3 mins. :P (how long does that really take with f22 or is it even non secret knowledge?) It gotta be fast it is clear... But makes heck lot of fun in single player and makes bvr really bvr.
Cruise accel. 1,5 mach? If its so irl then nightstorm is not even very far.. :0 What difference is acceleration 1,5mach and speed? What does mean 1,5mach ACCELERATION.
Wow, my boys looked hyper-competent this evening. Very proud of my fine dudes!
Does the GR AESA radar have LPI characteristics or is it more of a range boost? Looks like you guys put a ton of work into the update though, great job!
No, ELINT in DCS is super rudimentary but irl the Su35 doesn't have an AESA radar anyways.
Purely a range boost. Still detectable as if it were mechanical.
@@grimreapers Thanks!
His wife said he couldn't play.....love it !!
I have to skip the boring parts when there are no canards present.
And this video demonstrates to me that the best possible plane is... an F22 with canards.
Thanks, Mr and Mrses The Reapers.
Good job. I'm glad to see somebody actually de-fanboying some of these community mods. Things like the su-35 and the su-57 mods are so ridiculously over the top over done that they have absolutely no resemblance to reality. It's like the people who made them were getting butt hurt over the capabilities of things like the f-22 and then created these fictitious versions of these Russian aircraft to put do them.
The refuelling was hilarious
would it be possible to model the typhoon with Aerodynamic Modification Kit (AMK), Aesa and Stage 2 engine:
The new engine plan to increase the output 30% more power compared to the original EJ200. The engine will have dry thrust of around 78 kN (or 17,500 lbf) with a reheated output of around 120 kN (or 27,000 lbf)
Going into a air to air fight with near peer adversaries during the missile age is like playing a FPS shooter except everyone has aimbot/Esp lol
And an aimbot courtesy of FPS CHEATS
Ohhhh you said Aimbot already . . . .DOH !
Hey Cap!
US Airforce Commander today: "If decision is made to send US troops to Ukraine, US Air Force will create no-fly zone for Russians over Ukraine within a few hours."
You should model this.
LOVE YER CONTENT!
--a valued viewer
i think that's pretty much what's just happened here.
@@timallison8560 not really two totally different things. They are sneaking in and specifically targeting bombers then getting the F out.
they pretty much proved that nothing can compete, which is pretty much the much the case after outspending the rest of the developed world COMBINED in military spending every year for over 20 consecutive years.
Cap, the real Su35 uses the Irbis-E, the same PESA radar found on the Su30MKI
Thanks Ian.
Someone set the SU-35 with the all seeing eye of Sauron radar system, nice 🤣🤣 …. that explains a lot of the issues you kept having.
More carrier command please!
Very well!? It’s wonderfully well!! Lol
Your guys work is amazing. I can’t do anything to change my dcs stuff. Just wanted to say su-35 doesn’t have an aesa radar it has pesa phased array
Pesa is far less capable than aesa but is still quite powerful
@@mattseller148 less about power than fidelity and resolution but yeah, PESA is not nearly as good.
TBH our AESA is only partially realistic in game, so I think it will be "near enough".
Does anyone know what program they are using?
I found your channel 3 weeks ago and I love all of the content. Question though, Is This a Game anyone can get?
yes and free to install.
@@grimreapers ok fantastic. Love your content and Really like your group you play with. they're all great and keep up the fantastic work. Wish you all the best
I suggest consulting with Alex Hollings from sandbox news regarding SU-57 RCS
thx