Quarterhorse: The Future of Hypersonic Flight
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ค. 2024
- Thanks to Keeps for sponsoring this video! Head to keeps.com/SIMON to get a special offer. Individual results may vary
Got a beard? Good. I've got something for you: beardblaze.com
Simon's Social Media:
Twitter: / simonwhistler
Instagram: / simonwhistler
This video is #sponsored by Keeps.
Love content? Check out Simon's other TH-cam Channels:
Warographics: / @warographics643
SideProjects: / @sideprojects
Into The Shadows: / intotheshadows
Today I Found Out: / todayifoundout
Highlight History: / @highlighthistory
Brain Blaze: / @brainblaze6526
Casual Criminalist: / thecasualcriminalist
Decoding the Unknown: / @decodingtheunknown2373
Places: / @places302
Astrographics: / @astrographics-ve4yq
Thanks to Keeps for sponsoring this video! Head to keeps.com/SIMON to get a special offer. Individual results may vary
I C U In MyPillow BodyBags M-8s
a Bald man advertising a hair product is like a Cat woman giving relationship advice lmao
Suggestion : Please continue with the "Everything You Need to Know" series...it's awesome!
Maybe the next video in the series could be about Missiles?
I loved this video, and personally I don't give a rats arse if you said quarterhouse instead of quarterhorse, it's literally a slip of the tongue.
Thank you Simon for a well presented and informative video, let's hope the chinese, Russians and North Koreans aren't watching. 😮
I always thought ISR meant Interdiction / Strike / Reconnaissance?
Take a drink every time Simon says "quarter horse" 🐴🍺🥃😵 Take two drinks when he says "quarter house" 🤣🤣🤣
No thanks. I won't abuse my liver like that. 🤣
Half drink on “mark”, half drink on “Mach”. Let hilarity ensue.
dude, all these comments are proving 100% that mispronouncing things to ragebait people into commenting works extremely well for engagiement.
lmao I'm going to have to get more beer uh
Even if it was 3.2 beer, you'd still get PISSED!
(UK pissed, not American pissed.)
you said quarter house alot haha
Even says courthouse
It's intentional mispronunciation. These TH-cam channels get credit when people say things in the comments section. They would prefer if everybody says exactly what you did. It also wastes your and my time. I typically unsubscribe to channels that do this.
I read.this before I started watching. At first I thought surely you misheard him. But no, he clearly called it quarter house multiple times 😆
I noticed that as well. Haha
"Say it right frenchy!"
For anyone wondering: the term Quarterhorse comes from the breed of horse specifically bred to race a quarter mile. They have explosive speed, and are actually faster in the quarter mile sprint than the more well-known distance running Thoroughbred, famous for their mile+ races like the Kentucky Derby. Naming something after a Quarterhorse implies it can achieve extreme speed, extremely quickly.
I’m a horse nerd, I had to say it.
Where he got Quarterhouse, I know not. But it made me want a steak.
Thanks. I thought that a quarter horse was bread to work cattle. Now I know different.
Quarterhouse; for when your only a quarter hungry 😂
Just be glad he didn't mention the Quarterhose or you'd be needing the bathroom too
Here r numbers and at end of post what they could be hiding... there is a small %age of massively publicized project which fail and since railguns will also have evolved hence the feasibility of this project looks unfit for what it is pitching in whole/entire video... now the thing they are hiding seems to rub shoulders with SpaceX etc they are actually making a Astro version of 777 ... where SpaceX is perusing A380 ... this Astro 777 makes sense specially entering and exiting mach 5+ more gracefully/efficiently they all they need is safe/pressurized fuselage to ferry astronauts/anyone to even moon and back cuz right with takeoff from spaceport/airport sliding into mach 5+ speed will save alot of effort/fuel as inertia etc to continue the travel ... maybe 1 refueling at ISS and off to moon ... reentry to earth wont be problem as it is already designed for mach 5+ frictions... landing on moon will be peace of cake cuz of near zero atmosphere and any factors which dominate mars... also i believe mach 5+ will not let this craft to size any bigger than F16 .. i guess they will remain locked on 1x to 1.5x of F16 for few decades where any size increase will not mean more people but more fuel, better safer engine ... even passenger area (2-4 people) could be used to carry/deploy micro satellite or (emergency) iss-supplies...
It's mostly used for just that, and is extremely popular among ranchers in the US from Texas to Montana.@@shadetreemech290
One man’s horse is clearly another man’s house
Two man’s horse?
Here r numbers and at end of post what they could be hiding... there is a small %age of massively publicized project which fail and since railguns will also have evolved hence the feasibility of this project looks unfit for what it is pitching in whole/entire video... now the thing they are hiding seems to rub shoulders with SpaceX etc they are actually making a Astro version of 777 ... where SpaceX is perusing A380 ... this Astro 777 makes sense specially entering and exiting mach 5+ more gracefully/efficiently they all they need is safe/pressurized fuselage to ferry astronauts/anyone to even moon and back cuz right with takeoff from spaceport/airport sliding into mach 5+ speed will save alot of effort/fuel as inertia etc to continue the travel ... maybe 1 refueling at ISS and off to moon ... reentry to earth wont be problem as it is already designed for mach 5+ frictions... landing on moon will be peace of cake cuz of near zero atmosphere and any factors which dominate mars... also i believe mach 5+ will not let this craft to size any bigger than F16 .. i guess they will remain locked on 1x to 1.5x of F16 for few decades where any size increase will not mean more people but more fuel, better safer engine ... even passenger area (2-4 people) could be used to carry/deploy micro satellite or (emergency) iss-supplies...
well said
One man's horse is the SAME man's house
The SR71 was made in the 60s but it still looks like it's from the future.
DOES IT THOUGH?
Ben Rich wrote an excellent book about the Skunkworks and covered the SR-71 development. He was in charge of thermodynamics and that design was a major headache for him to solve, and they never got it 100%... The plane got so hot the airframe expanded and the cold fuel tanks did not, it had to use specialized fuel, and the flexible seals degraded and the tanks frequently leaked fuel during and after flights. The cockpit air conditioning had to blow at -40F to keep the cabin temperature at 80 degrees, you could freeze skin holding it next to a cockpit vent. Then they dumped the unstart problem on him because he designed the adjustable cone intakes on the engines and when parameters shifted the shock wave a few degrees it caused an instant compressor stall that slammed the plane around with such force it threatened to knock the pilots unconscious. They installed sensors and a computer to automatically correct the cone position when an unstart was detected.
@@scottbrady6240 Yes.
If you see one in the flesh it doesn't.
G'day,
Probably because, back in the 1960s, most of the people who designed and built the SR-71
THOUGHT
That Humanity had a High-Technology
Future ahead of it.
Anthropogenic Global Warming was well understood, by Climate Scientists and Meteorologists...; but the Techno-Heads working for the
Military Industrial Complex were either uninformed,
Wilfully Ignorant,
Or living in
Denial.
So they competed to design
Single-seat Hairygoplanes which could
Fart more CO-2 in less time, while travelling further, faster ; than anything ever built by People driven by their own
Overcompensated Inferiority Complexes, projecting all their Self-Hatred and Loathings outwards, onto the
"Designated Enemy"
In some Ethnocentric
Out-Group,
Who "must" be defended against, and who
"Needs" to be
Beaten unto
Submission.
And,
Thus...
We
TRASHED
The EARTH.
Very Very VERY
Cleverly... &
Powerfully,
At great expense.
Because
Worriers are
Fearful by
"Profession".
Such is life,
Have a good one.....
Stay safe.
;-p
Ciao !
I would love to watch the bloopers reel and see EXACTLY the moment when Simon just like, "F*ck it! I said what I said!"
Since they are in Atlanta, I say we call them the "Possum Works". A fitting term for us Southern Boy's down here!😆😆😆
Armadillo Works is good also.
There are plenty of skunks in Georgia (and that's not including the politicians).
The Opossum Works 😝
"southern boys"
Second
If he says quarterHOUSE one more time I swear to god.
😅
How do you even make that mistake? How does it even pass editing? I don’t expect perfect professionalism but that is ridiculous lol
So often they crank out vids full of mistakes. Would it kill them do retakes of fluffed lines, please!
Nice to see a shout for Alex Hollings and Sandboxx News. Award winning military journalism.
First time I clicked on one of Alex’s videos, I had no idea what the quality would be as military focused YT channels range from great to AI read trash. I was massively impressed. So anyone into military aviation that hasn’t checked out his videos, highly recommended!
He is useless. he go on about Hermeus bla bla. did you know Australia has world fastest scramjet in the world at mach 12 and helped USA in hypersonics since early 2000's since Aussie Ray Stalker was first to get essence of flight from scramjets. HIFIRE and SCIFIRE helped develop USA HACAM and HAWC scramjet missiles, they are joint USA, Australia hypersonic tests.
Australian company will test fly a scramjet powered drone in 300 days and probably beat this Hermeus. but Alex Hollings will not do anything on it.
Australian company won a USA HYCAT DUI contract to build USA hypersonic vehicles and won it over 63 other companies including this Hermeus.
Guys who own the company helped USA in HIFIRE.. guy who designed scramjet worked at NASA and all he did was design scramjets.
Aussies invented the oval designed inturned scramjet design. problem they found in X43 was it was rectangular and had heating problems..
I'm Alex hollings and this is Air Power
Ah, the famous quarter house. The single person's dream.
In this economy??? I think i could afford a eighth house
Here r numbers and at end of post what they could be hiding... there is a small %age of massively publicized project which fail and since railguns will also have evolved hence the feasibility of this project looks unfit for what it is pitching in whole/entire video... now the thing they are hiding seems to rub shoulders with SpaceX etc they are actually making a Astro version of 777 ... where SpaceX is perusing A380 ... this Astro 777 makes sense specially entering and exiting mach 5+ more gracefully/efficiently they all they need is safe/pressurized fuselage to ferry astronauts/anyone to even moon and back cuz right with takeoff from spaceport/airport sliding into mach 5+ speed will save alot of effort/fuel as inertia etc to continue the travel ... maybe 1 refueling at ISS and off to moon ... reentry to earth wont be problem as it is already designed for mach 5+ frictions... landing on moon will be peace of cake cuz of near zero atmosphere and any factors which dominate mars... also i believe mach 5+ will not let this craft to size any bigger than F16 .. i guess they will remain locked on 1x to 1.5x of F16 for few decades where any size increase will not mean more people but more fuel, better safer engine ... even passenger area (2-4 people) could be used to carry/deploy micro satellite or (emergency) iss-supplies...
We have them, they call them tiny houses. Most of them cost about as much as a small real house and not something a few drunken high school boys could rock and maybe flip onto its side.
I guess you could as get a few of those prefabricated storage builds and arrange them into house.
love seeing Alex as a reference he's a good journalist and him and his team at sandbox do good getting info.
He’s not a good journalist. He’s a good PR person. He makes some entertaining videos, but don’t expect him to ever report on anything that casts a negative light on the hand that feeds him. That doesn’t mean that everything he says is bullshit, far from it. Just that you should keep that in mind and take with a grain of salt what you hear from him.
theyre probably one of if not my favorite military news (american) by far.
Love the Sandbox News shout out! Big fan of Alex, too. Great researcher!
The Quarterhorse Mk 2 (at 14:51) looks amazingly similar to the Lockheed D-21 drone; which was designed to be carried and launched on the back of an SR-71.
I really am a fan of house racing
Here r numbers and at end of post what they could be hiding... there is a small %age of massively publicized project which fail and since railguns will also have evolved hence the feasibility of this project looks unfit for what it is pitching in whole/entire video... now the thing they are hiding seems to rub shoulders with SpaceX etc they are actually making a Astro version of 777 ... where SpaceX is perusing A380 ... this Astro 777 makes sense specially entering and exiting mach 5+ more gracefully/efficiently they all they need is safe/pressurized fuselage to ferry astronauts/anyone to even moon and back cuz right with takeoff from spaceport/airport sliding into mach 5+ speed will save alot of effort/fuel as inertia etc to continue the travel ... maybe 1 refueling at ISS and off to moon ... reentry to earth wont be problem as it is already designed for mach 5+ frictions... landing on moon will be peace of cake cuz of near zero atmosphere and any factors which dominate mars... also i believe mach 5+ will not let this craft to size any bigger than F16 .. i guess they will remain locked on 1x to 1.5x of F16 for few decades where any size increase will not mean more people but more fuel, better safer engine ... even passenger area (2-4 people) could be used to carry/deploy micro satellite or (emergency) iss-supplies...
1:30 - Mid roll ads
3:00 - Chapter 1 - Meet hermeus
9:20 - Chapter 2 - Quarterhouse line
17:00 - Chapter 3 - Progress & potential
Quarterhouse*
For anyone not from the US, bear in mind driving coast to coast in the US takes 35-45 hours. 45 min is crazy.
The road distance from New York to San Francisco is about 3,270 miles. Even at 45 hours, it would require a sustained _average_ speed of almost 73 miles per hour with no rest stops or fuel stops. Can't be done, legally anyway.
the current cannonball record is a bit over 25hours. thats nyc to redondo beach. but yeah, obviously *very* illegal... theres a video around on how they modified the car for the record, fascinating stuff.
@Milosz_Ostrow Coast to coast usually means rough distance horizontally. Virginia beach to la would also be "coast to coast". The cannonball run has a name because it is one route. The longest would be Key West, Florida to Flattery, Washington. Hence the spread.
@@Milosz_Ostrow > The road distance from New York to San Francisco is about 3,270 miles
No, about 2850. So a little over 60 mph. Through states whose speed limits are mostly 70-80 mph.
Pretty easy with two drivers
However, as usual Simon is wrong. "Continental" includes Alaska. He clearly means "coterminous". (And "quarterhorse", not "quarterhouse".)
@@pablonh Imagine how far away your luggage could get!
From the stalls to the stars, Hermeus is the thoroughbred Quarter Horse that will Neyyy its way to the edge of space!!! 😅
Or its owners fill their pockets and get lost when its dying in the hanger
Ohh, that is still a long way to go. Needs over Mach 25, for orbital velocity. When Mk2 goes Mach 3 and Mk.3 may reach Mach 6, then Mk.6 might come close to a real space plane. It is above Mach 5, where it must switch to scramjet. What this means is, that they must design a hybrid engine from three different concepts into one. Plus a 4th engine type, a rocket, to return from orbit.
just wait untill you hear about darkhorse.
Here r numbers and at end of post what they could be hiding... there is a small %age of massively publicized project which fail and since railguns will also have evolved hence the feasibility of this project looks unfit for what it is pitching in whole/entire video... now the thing they are hiding seems to rub shoulders with SpaceX etc they are actually making a Astro version of 777 ... where SpaceX is perusing A380 ... this Astro 777 makes sense specially entering and exiting mach 5+ more gracefully/efficiently they all they need is safe/pressurized fuselage to ferry astronauts/anyone to even moon and back cuz right with takeoff from spaceport/airport sliding into mach 5+ speed will save alot of effort/fuel as inertia etc to continue the travel ... maybe 1 refueling at ISS and off to moon ... reentry to earth wont be problem as it is already designed for mach 5+ frictions... landing on moon will be peace of cake cuz of near zero atmosphere and any factors which dominate mars... also i believe mach 5+ will not let this craft to size any bigger than F16 .. i guess they will remain locked on 1x to 1.5x of F16 for few decades where any size increase will not mean more people but more fuel, better safer engine ... even passenger area (2-4 people) could be used to carry/deploy micro satellite or (emergency) iss-supplies...
@@MichaelWinter-ss6lx Australia has a scramjet drone and has world fastest scramjet at mach 12, helped USA in hypersonics during HIFIRE joint hypersonic tests of USA, AUS that led to HAWC and HACAM scramjet missiles.
Ray Stalker Aussie was first to get essence of flight from scramjets.
Hypersonixs is the Australian company and Dr Michael Smart scramjet inventor was part of HIFIRE and worked at NASA designign scramjets.
China even stole Ray Stalker free piston wind tunnel designs and now claim they have world fastest hypersonic wind tunnels
Hypersonixs has recently won a USA HYCAT DUI contract to build USA hypersonic vehicles and won it over 63 other companies and i bet even Quarterhorse.
Hypersonics has 4 drone designs and few are for space delivering satelites.
Australia can build scramjets in 3 weeks and first flight of Hypersonixs drone is in 300 days and will probably beat this one in flight and in speed
Hypersonixs so good Kratos has partnered up with them and atleast Hypersonixs did not use a design that all seem to. their drones are unique. similar to a sleek dart shape and look more suitable for higher speeds of cutting through the atmosphere.
QUARTER HOUSE
rrrroad house
How many times, does Simon talk about
a mythical Doctor? Well, Hugh Laurie IS
from England! (Or, 1/4 of a doctor.)
steve
9:56
dude, all these comments are proving 100% that mispronouncing things to ragebait people into commenting works extremely well for engagiement.
Actually, it's a buck and a quarter quarter house, but I'm not telling him that
Hey, at least Simon wasn’t saying Porterhouse hehe
Mmm steak.
🤤 🥩
The Pratt & Whitney J-58 in the SR-71 was a combined-cycle engine. The JP-7 fuel was formulated to NOT ignite easily partly because of the high temperature inside the tanks but also that it could be used as hydraulic fluid (to keep the hydraulic system cool enough to work) and as coolant for the skin. Pilots claimed that there was still throttle left when flying at the official speed limit of Mach 3.2. Bits of the titanium skin would be getting soft at Mach 3.4. Not bad for 1958 tech.
In modern terms, the J-58 blurs the line between an 'adaptive cycle engine', which is a turbofan that can vary its core/bypass flow ratio, and a 'combined cycle engine', which has a complete turbojet/turbofan and ram/scramjet (or even rocket) sharing the same inlet and exhaust nozzle. The bypass ducts on the J-58 only started after the 4th compressor stage, and only carried 25% of the airflow. Unlike a true combined cycle engine, the turbomachinery was always active and fuelled, not bypassed and shut down. However unlike any current adaptive cycle engine, at cruise all the useful compression came from the inlet and all the useful thrust came from the afterburner section - the compressor and turbine needed to be active to make the airflow work (and run the ancilleries), but thrust generation was similar to a ramjet. The J-58 was an amazing bit of engineering and often misunderstood - there seems to be a lot of misinformation about how it works.
The moment he opened with "its been..." I had already started hearing that song in my head.
I'll see myself out lol 😆
You seem like someone who'd laugh at a funeral while holding a chickity china chicken drumstick
can't wait to see ThunderF00t's video
Yeah.. this smells strongly of bullshit
@@smenor Oh I believe that the military is going to be *very* interested in this. But the commercial applications? Yeah, BS.
@@H4hT53 you're presuming this isn't pure vapourware BS
@@smenor Elon's continual lies have jaded me to the promise of iterative process in hardware tech projects.
The issue is not to reach such speeds, but to keep the plane in control, plus the temperature and material elongations. I don't think they will be able to create the HALCYION any time soon because of that. But we'll see.
Alot of material science has been done with with high heat applications since the sr71.
The damn space shuttle didn't exist for over a decade after mach 3 was being cruised at.
And now you got rich assholes that's figured out reentry.
That was my question. In their launch videos they talk about thrust but not about aero or heat. Control shouldn't be too hard with everything being 'by-wire' now a days.
The flight computers will take care of the control surfaces for stable flight. I just don't think material science is there yet to create something as re-usable as a production hypersonic recognizance platform aircraft for the us military at scale.
@SortaProfessional89 we have had reuseable materials capable of burning for long periods during re-entry for decades, what factors make this specifically impossible for now in your mind? From my perspective it sounds like if we aren't currently there, we are incredibly close.
@SortaProfessional89 I think you'd be surprised. Hypersonic tech got shelved during the cold war. On paper from what I've seen, is doable. We've had the tech for 40 years now. But due to various politics, corruption, and lack of need it all got shelved. So it's the relearning of already completed concepts
If I recall correctly, one of the main reasons work on supersonic commercial aircraft pretty much stopped was because the Concorde was so bloody loud that the number of routes it was allowed on was very limited. If you want a hypersonic craft that will be allowed to fly over any settled ground it will also need to make it be able to fly that fast without a sonic boom.
I know NASA has a test craft for that, at least for supersonic speeds, but I haven't heard anything about how successful it is.
You can fly that part at subsonic flight until your cleared for hypersonic.
@@kqckeforyou4433 Clearly, "just fly slow until you're allowed to fly fast" wasn't good enough to make the Concorde commercially viable.
It’s great to see Simon and his team have discovered Alex Hollings from Sandbox News. He’s hands down the best military aviation journalist in the world.
Also, the hardware rich and rapid iteration method of development seems to be the most successful option for engineering. It’s the method that helped SpaceX become so successful and innovative.
"You'll never be him. You may surpass his achievements, but his contributions will outweigh anything you could ever hope to accomplish. Try as you may, but his legend will outlive yours."
Touring their factory soon for my aerodynamics class
Quarter House!!🤣!! Love you Simon!!
"Quarterhorse" sounds so much better than most project names. (I'm 100% sure there's a 15yr-old somewhere naming US projects and operations)
The Mark II reminds me of the D-21 Drone for the A-12 the Loyal Wingman Program reminds me of those old top-down shooter arcade games.
There are definitely issues to be dealt with besides propulsion. Heat being a major one. The SR71 leaks until it heats up. And one for a passenger aircraft is sonic booming is a no-no over land. This sure sounds like it has potential but it's certainly got some hurdles to clear yet. Thanks for sharing.
Wrong but never mind.
@@samuelgarrod8327it doesn’t have hurdles to overcome?
You’re dumb but never mind.
you are spewing stuff you read on the internet without knowing the actual physics of it, i suggest you watch engineering today darkhorse
THIS IS THE WAY! He said it he said the thing from the other thing
Got to say I love seeing upcoming technology build. That's not just theoretical but has been real world approved
its not, this, is, the, way, its "this is the way" from mandalore:P
All this just goes to show how insane Concorde was. Super cruising at over Mach 2 with over 100 passengers and crew, their cargo and creature comforts, designed and built nearly 60 years ago!
He seems extra pumped for this one😂
Probably has stock in hermeus or what ever lol
Speaking of that...
Any know this companies ticker? Lol I wanna buy a, stock 😅
I don’t think they’re publicly traded
@@MickelFrisch lol this was exactly what I thought but I wouldn't buy any shares even if you could unless you're trying to do a pump-and-dump
It's cocain, its always cocain.
@@DeltaEntropy no but they almost certainly have private investors and I'd wager are raising and this video is here to get prospective investors hyped on BS
Word to Alex Hollings
too bad they failed to mention Darkhorse?
@@Tripskiii or Darkhouse 🤣
Everyone is always chasing the GOAT, the SR71. It will still be the asterisk in the history books. Good luck to future engineers.
What about the X15 ??
Quarter House? Simon must need a new eyeglass prescription lol... But wait.. I thought he said horse at least once. U aight simon?
dude, all these comments are proving 100% that mispronouncing things to ragebait people into commenting works extremely well for engagiement.
@@TheNewOption think it’s intentional?
@@brentdennard6722 oh for sure. There's no reason why someone reading a script with knowledge of the actual name would suddenly change the way he says it.
@@TheNewOption BS. look up 'word blindness'
Doesn't surprise me. Atlanta, my home town , and the Georgia Tech school of engineering. Know a lot of really smart people who taught, and graduated from Tech , including my father. Go Jackets !
Yeah, really famous 😂
My uncle a long time ago...
Go jackets! Took a class with the flight test manager of the iron bird version of the quarter horse while at Tech.
Hmmm. The Concorde problem. What about sonic booms over land? I remember them, and thought they were really cool. Tech I could hear.
Never thought I'd see factboy and Alex Hollings crossover.
Say Quarter House one more time!
I kept hearing that too! It's Quarter Horse! HORSE!!!
20+ years ago I pitched an idea of device to an executive at Blackberry where I worked. A phone with a large touch screen with multiple applications that you could access with one touch on the screen. Including a camera, date planner, alarm clock. Access to a website where games and music were available. Basically the iPhone a full year or two before the iPhone was launched. The manager looked at me and laughed. He said. And I quote. “We don’t go in for that gimmicky stuff. Our product speaks for itself.”
I guess not. Last time I saw a Blackberry device it was being used as a door stop. Didn’t even do that well. The time before that I saw one being thrown at a squirrel. Which thankfully missed.
So that wasn’t the SR-71 in the opening. That was the A-12. Only reason I know, is because you showed footage from the USS Alabama battleship park. My favorite place in my hometown.
Not the A-12, the Lockheed YF-12 the Interceptor variant of the SR-71 that had both guns & carried Falcon missiles.
This is really awesome to get an update on this company and all I remember seeing a video explaining the engine a while ago. I hope in 200 or so days from now there is another update
Simon: “It’s tougher work than you think reading off a telepumpkin… hang on… teleprompter.”
@26:40 a barrier that humanity can't seem to pass: yeah, it's called the TSA
90 minute flight
270 minute check-in times
I appreciate this video so much! I feel like I get 2 great cups of coffee out of my harrio grinder and aero press at the office with a local dark roast. I know dark roasts aren't the preference for coffee enthusiasts but your nose knows you know?
Reasons I '👍' a video: Keeping track of what I have already watched.
You know when you listen too Simon and you don't know if you've seen this vid or the same subject on another channel 🤣
Blackbird, according to this channel, was mach 3.5-3.7 with plenty of engine left. Keeping the airframe intact was the reason they never pushed the SR71 engines to max. Hopefully, Quarterhorse has the airframe solved with a robustly reusable platform. I would hazard that the engine is already in the bank.
Super interesting stuff! Thank you for the video!
Hopefully they can successfully do a Long Range commercial version of this with the Halcyon. Sydney-London and Sydney-New York in a few hours would be awesome.
Can you imagine how frickin hot that bird will get doing hypersonic in the atmosphere? Even the upper ionosphere has enough air to burn it up.
I've been arguing for wingman drones for decades now. Glad they're finally considering it.
Lockheed Super Constellation engined with the Pratt and Whitney R4360R59B. Good fuel mileage and comfortable travel!
Always well researched, informative and excellently narrated
Imagine this: you are an airforce pilot flying a dangerous reconnaissance mission into Russia. Then suddenly, alarms beep as you realise that a missile has a lock on your aircraft, and you will be dead in a minute. You decide to do a very advanced maneuver to try to get away alive. You push the throttle up to 100%, and you accelerate up to mach 6 where the missile is left in the dust.
I know many SAMs can reach speeds up to 9 mach like the SAM fired from the S-500, but there are still a lot of missiles a mach 6 aircraft could outrun, and maybe even outmaneuver hypersonic missiles.
*"Imagine something that can fly like an airplane... but do it while going BLOODY quickly!"*
Not where I thought that was going
Take a second to think about this. In order to go forward at Mach 5, how fast does the exhaust of the engine have to be? It has to be faster by the amount of drag the ship experiences at Mach 5. But it doesn't just have to be faster. The exhaust is low density plasma. The exhaust has to have more momentum then the vehicle is loosing from drag. This is actually insane.
Been following this subject a bit! pretty cool!
Hermeus....Hermaeus... Hermaeus Mora....sounds like there's tentacles and library books involved
I want Simon’s voice as my Siri voice
If Simon has to go retro and do a Business Blaze episode on this (if so, maybe in ten years or so), I can only imagine what he’ll have for material!!
Someone did not want to re-record this... Way to go Fact boy 😂😂😂
First guy: Wait, where major Kong?
Second guy: His riding the quarter horse.
Major Kong: Yaaahooo
Titanium 3D printing, that's cool af
Good to see @sandboxx getting a shoutout!
Simon, my gods man! Please refilm this.
Warfare is about economics. Throwing multi-million dollar systems at what is in essence a fairly low tech problem is unlikely to pan out in the long run.
I appreciate a confident bald man talking about hair products. btw the beard is boss as fuck.
Perhaps not the ideal salesman for the product. He should have said he uses it on his beard.
The J58 used in the A-12 and subsequently SR-71 is a combined cycle engine.
We've had super-sonic flight since Chuck Yager flew the Bell X1. But, to this day, nobody has been able to make super-sonic passenger flights make economic sense. The SST was always losing money and that was the most successful of all attempts to fly passengers faster than sound.
DarkHorse. Their Chimera engine is what everyone else is looking into
Their eventual passenger craft, the Halcyon, appears to take design cues from North American Aviation's XB-70.
Quarter Horse,, Quarter House, completely interchangeable eh Simon?
dude, all these comments are proving 100% that mispronouncing things to ragebait people into commenting works extremely well for engagiement.
@@TheNewOption No, it proves that if you want to become very wealthy using TH-cam, you still need to be professional rather than lazy.
It also brings out lily-livered apologists as I'm sure you know better than most.
When Simon Said "companies like Lockheed and Boeing", i half expected a joke about missing screws and conveniently canceled live subscriptions of whistle blowers
Woah, t-shirt!? Simon used to be our boy in the blaze!
I got so excited when you said “special episode “ 😆
As an old Tom Clancy fan, I just can't help but think that if we are hearing about it, it already exists. So too does the next generation.
But that’s not really the way scientific advancement works. Truly new tech comes from universities and other research level laboratories, then picked up by private companies to make the tech viable outside of a lab setting, and then goes on to be included in military projects.
The Space Shuttle was suppose to be low maintenance. Call BS on this claim. The “engine” was actually the “easy” part. Materials for the aircraft and fuel are going to be very challenging. See what made the sr71 so damn expensive to fly.
You say tomato, I say tomato. Potato, potato. 🏠🐎?
Wow!
I am glad that America is still innovating when it comes to air craft!😎
Faster than the Bald, Bearded and Bespectacled One setting up a new TH-cam channel!
( You *know* we love you, Simon! )
Phase 1 and 2 of the Chimera sound exactly like the engine used in the SR-71. Basically, the SR-71 converts to a pseudo Ramjet at above MACH 2 or so until it tops out at MACH ??. This is done by inlet control using the inlet cone and variable geometry vanes. Getting this wrong during early testing is how they lost at least one plane with one survival and one death as a result (the story for this is insane as the plane just came apart around the pilots).
There are two primary issues with air breathing engines and super/hyper sonic flight. The first is dealing with the shockwave itself. If not dealt with, this can cause cavitation at the inlet, leading to engine starvation and stalling. This one is already pretty much understood and handled. The second is dealing with super/hypersonic airflow through the engine itself. Most early design scramjets used a open/close model. The engine has two doors, one in the front and one in the rear. The rear door is closed while the front is opened. This allows air to enter the combustion chamber and compress (due to the internal engine geometry). When the parameters are right, the front door is closed, fuel is sprayed into the combustion chamber then ignited. At this point, the rear door is opened. This allows the combustion wavefront to expand out the rear of the engine, providing thrust. Early observations of this type of scramjet often referred to it as "donuts on a rope". Basically, the craft produces pulsed bursts of combustion with a connecting vapor contrail connecting the puffs of exhaust. There are newer versions of engine geometry that do away with this model since the mechanical requirements are complicated and failure is always a concern. Usually, the resulting burn pattern is similar because the geometry still creates a similar behavior, just without mechanical doors involved. Neither ramjets nor scramjets work at low speed because there either isn't any air (starting from a standstill to taxi) or too little air being pushed in to create thrust.
One or 2 rooms, quarter house. Hermeus’s proof of concept aircraft, Quarterhorse.
The Loyal Wingman project..... Ace Combat 7 vibes there.
If there's one thing we know for sure, it's that development cost predictions are ALWAYS way too low. If the real costs were given, many projects would be dead from the outset. It will be no different here and in reality will cost billions again.
Very interesting article Simon but I think we all want to know, does it have cup holders?
Yes. We must know !!! Most important feature in any vehicle
If these guys succeed with the Quarterhorse they will end up becoming like Lockheed Martin or Northrop Grumman or Boeing. Darkhorse will make them a legend. Halcyon most likely is a dream though.
Let's see something hypersonic first before we talk about scramjets and speeds above Mach 6.
Oh. My. Glob. Simon saying “quarter house” is pushing my blood pressure to unhealthy levels.
its like the Topgun activity module in MSFS 2022. take off under jet, turn on scram get to that speed and hit the go button,
This is not 60yrs behind. Yet a measure of minutes of development
No mention of the impact of friction on high speed flight.
Looks like the PAN AM plane from 2001. That classic Bone that turns into a space station with the plane approaching. Looks identical to
Napkin to airplane in 204 days. Dude needs some origami practice, I can make a paper plane in 17 seconds, which is a million times quicker.
Edit: On a more serious note, love a bit of referencing between good channels on TH-cam. Anyone referencing Sandboxx (and vice versa) is doing something right.
This guy is found on every 2nd channel on youtube. Like what da fug??!??
Quarter house! Omfg!
A hypersonic reusable aircraft? That would be incredible... tech which would change everything, at least militarily, that's for sure. Take off like a plane, go hypersonic, land and do it again and again. Some would "kill" to get a hold of that kind of tech.