what a lot of hunters don't realize is that digital machines don't do everything and the old analogue skills still apply--using the cross sweep and all metal tell you more than any meter. I can see that you examine your signals with a lot of patience obviously why you are a successful hunter. great video I also appreciate seeing the entire process and and what you are learing from each dig. rgrdz clive
What an expressive machine! It has it's own personality. I am enjoying watching you start to bond with it. You are going to rocking with it this fall in a productive environment.
One place that I've been detecting for a year or two was a Tanyard from 1808-1829. There's many cast iron kettle pieces just below the surface. Depending on the size, they always give a higher tone/number than other iron objects associated with this site. I'm not sure, but it could be due to the iron being subjected to heat during its usage.
Thanks for making the video. I'm really interested in ordering a V3. They are very expensive but hopefully worth it. I hope to talk to you about the v3. I'm also going to reach out to Merrill in NY. Thanks, Andy
@@ChuckPourciau I currently swing a DEUS 2, and the Tarsacci as a special tool for some sites. I’m always looking for an edge and this looks like something totally different from what I’ve ever used but because of its price I’m afraid to pull the trigger. I don’t know how to figure out how to call somebody in the states who owns one because all these comments are public.
Id choose this over any detector, including a gpz7000 or 6000 for gold, and or a park/field machine. Not the best for saltwater beach, but a sealed DD coil works for that too.
@@seahawks1185 I ended up ordering and receiving my V3. There is definitely learning curve but as I’m getting on with this machine rather well as of late. I can’t believe it’s unmasking capabilities, I am not talking about above ground nails, aluminum, bottle cap surface tests. It’s ability to sniff out a non-ferrous targets at depth, in iron is exceptional. The performance of this machine is ridiculously good…. So sensitive… So freaking deep. This is my first analog detector. I’ve only used digital machines so I had to get my head around that. After that, my world opened up. 👍👍
Been enjoying the vids. I am running an XPD2. Just a good machine. However this machine you are using interest me quite a bit. Looking like a great dirt machine, once learned.
I ran a Whites PI for some time and I also believed the POTS on the machine was much better than the digital functions of the Equi 800. You could really dial it in much tighter. @@ChuckPourciau
what a lot of hunters don't realize is that digital machines don't do everything and the old analogue skills still apply--using the cross sweep and all metal tell you more than any meter. I can see that you examine your signals with a lot of patience obviously why you are a successful hunter. great video I also appreciate seeing the entire process and and what you are learing from each dig. rgrdz clive
@4:59 "least favorite are the hole to hole ones where all you see are the holes after they found the target"
Truer words have never been spoken. 👍
What an expressive machine! It has it's own personality. I am enjoying watching you start to bond with it. You are going to rocking with it this fall in a productive environment.
A good productive hunt. Glad to have a few days of not so hot weather. I’m learning with you! JCR
Didn't last long. The next 5 days are 103, 106, 107, 105, 104. I live in the Sahara!
Interesting video. Thanks for taking us to school with you.
I have four degrees but this is the most interesting schooling I've had. 😉
One place that I've been detecting for a year or two was a Tanyard from 1808-1829. There's many cast iron kettle pieces just below the surface. Depending on the size, they always give a higher tone/number than other iron objects associated with this site. I'm not sure, but it could be due to the iron being subjected to heat during its usage.
I've never thought of that. But I do know that big iron pushes the signal into the nonferrous zone on any detector.
Thanks for making the video. I'm really interested in ordering a V3. They are very expensive but hopefully worth it. I hope to talk to you about the v3. I'm also going to reach out to Merrill in NY.
Thanks, Andy
They aren’t cheap but the build quality so exceeds any other detector I’ve owned. They’re not for everyone, but I’ve come to believe they’re for me.
@@ChuckPourciau
I currently swing a DEUS 2, and the Tarsacci as a special tool for some sites. I’m always looking for an edge and this looks like something totally different from what I’ve ever used but because of its price I’m afraid to pull the trigger. I don’t know how to figure out how to call somebody in the states who owns one because all these comments are public.
Id choose this over any detector, including a gpz7000 or 6000 for gold, and or a park/field machine. Not the best for saltwater beach, but a sealed DD coil works for that too.
@@seahawks1185
I ended up ordering and receiving my V3. There is definitely learning curve but as I’m getting on with this machine rather well as of late. I can’t believe it’s unmasking capabilities, I am not talking about above ground nails, aluminum, bottle cap surface tests. It’s ability to sniff out a non-ferrous targets at depth, in iron is exceptional. The performance of this machine is ridiculously good…. So sensitive… So freaking deep. This is my first analog detector. I’ve only used digital machines so I had to get my head around that. After that, my world opened up. 👍👍
Been enjoying the vids. I am running an XPD2. Just a good machine. However this machine you are using interest me quite a bit. Looking like a great dirt machine, once learned.
The D2 works as advertised but is a completely different animal. I’m enjoying this new platform
I ran a Whites PI for some time and I also believed the POTS on the machine was much better than the digital functions of the Equi 800. You could really dial it in much tighter.
@@ChuckPourciau
Is the Nexus MP V3 waterproof? Thanks!
Only the coils are waterproof. If it was completely waterproof, that wouldn’t be fair to other detectors. 😉
@@ChuckPourciauThanks!