It should also be noted that not only were the engines separate, their transmissions were as well. If you shot up one side of the engine-compartment, the other side was still functional and driveable.
I fucking wish they would add that feature I mean it can't be that bad or op ? I remember when they allowed the 103 to move left and right with either tracks or engines destroyed and it got removed...
@@pz.vincesiqueiros7185 if one track is out you can still aim but really slowly, both tracks gone or engine and transmission destroyed, you can't turn left and right you can only aim up and down. So basically if you get immobilised you're dead like 80% of the time
The jittering that came after they "fixed/remodeled" the aiming after the german 2gun tank is just driving me nuts i hate to play the strv now as it just doesn't aim properly
German VT-1-2 still can turn after engine is out and with the same turn rate as usual, which is crazy. Also the hull aiming is so much better the on s-tanks.
Major things that need to be improved in the Strv 103 in game: Two engines rather than one; Loader can load rounds after breech is either damaged or 'destroyed'; Jerry cans have a chance of defusing HEATFS; 103Cs fence having a chance of destabilizing kinetic rounds.
I personally think that these unreliable mechanics with a chance to work won't improve the gameplay so the fence should get certain protection modifier against apfsds instead (that's for jerrycans too). Autoloader can't be destroyed in any way and let's keep it the way it is (and if gaijin adds autoloader destruction then do it for russians too i dare you gaijin). I'd love to get more dampening when hull aiming is active though.
@@coltpiecemaker i really hope not, but i guess better then nothing. The strv 103 was always held back by a lack of ERA and thermals IMO so the D would be a perfect capstone for one of my favorite tank lines.
@@khajaja I agree, the D would be a nice addition to an already great tank line which would add some new things and changes like better protection and thermals
That was the point of it, why they had a difficult time trying to sell the design to other countries because it basically only worked well in Sweden :)
Aktchually the autoloader could even be pushed down to one round every two seconds but that had a chance of jamming the autoloader. Also the internal armour should be thicker if I'm not mistaken.
@@nicolaspeigne1429 I don't think it is a "Generic" auto loader reliability issue. The loader can be a 100% reliable but, there is a minimum time for certain things that must happen in sequence and any faster the machine jams because the spent casing can't eject any faster or the new round is moving too fast to line up with the breach. By over clocking the process, it eats into tolerances and breaks because you exceed elements require gravity which isn't going to change. 1 rnd every 2 seconds is crazy fast.
@@oohhboy-funhouse this autoloader is faster than most because the canon doesn't move, so it's much simpler. What i said is most autoloader are capable to be faster than what they are limited to, for the same reasons you cited.
The time to load was ~2.5 sec, this made it possible to select type of round to use after the target has been acquired without any loss of time to engage. In fact the gun do not reload after each shot automatically, the gunner need to press HE or AP for it to reload each time. Did my military service on the 103 in Sweden as an technician so I have actually drive it and engage targets with laser practice equipment, and it was really smooth to aim.
@@TR33ZY_CRTM Yea I also read that when Leclerc crews were faced with early Leopard 2s they would give up a lot of the time especially in North Africa where they were not used to fighting the Japanese.
I would love to see it in game that the if the engine gets shot and 1 survives the strv can still move somewhat it would add to its survivability and shooting it in the engine/transmission doesn't mean it's effectively taken out, I think it would be a good addition and makes them even more unique like them surviving with only 1 crew member
I kinda wish that the fact it has two engines was sort of modeled in game. Well, at least when it takes one engine hit it still can turn around and aim until 2nd hit is dealt or something like that. Would help it out a lot giving it any fighting back capabilities.
I honestly would love to see another S tank in game it's one of my favorite tanks though I would also like to see them add the engine detail since it would actually make the S tank more viable in war thunder
The cannon is actually considered an autocannon with 2,5 seconds reload. Practical fire rate is estimated around 4,5 seconds due to dust kicking up and so on. But you could hold the fire button and reload button at the same time to fire it automatically with 2,5 sec between shots.
There were some cons like engine repair taking more time, but if they actually allowed the thing to run on one destroyed engine i would happily accept the increased repair time
0:54 This isn't quite right. The piston engine powers the hydraulic pumps, which control both the suspension and the steering input to the final drives. If you lose the piston engine you can still drive around with just the turbine, but you have to use the emergency steering system, which is just a pair of clutch-brake steering levers, and you don't have any elevation control at all. The hydraulics also power the normal brakes, so to brake when the piston engine isn't running you need to use the steering levers or the parking brake. (Source: manual for the strv 103B, part 2 ("Fordon"), page 86 and on)
Its short track length also made it a beast in really rough terrain. It could go where other tanks could not. Its a full 10 calibres bigger than a standard L7 which made the effectivness substantial. Not slightly. As proven when fired upon Soviet tanks procured from east germany after the fall of the berlin wall in the early 90s. Otherwise great stuff.
0:31 There were 10.5 cm illumination rounds available already in the 1940's. What the 103C got was two external Lyran illumination discharger tubes (small mortars) with about 1.5 km range. 1:43 The British L7 had a barrel of L52 calibres, while the barrel in the S-tank was 62L calibres, so more than 20% longer. 1:57 The main part of the procurement was the R&D needed, not building the actual tanks. Once bought, the R&D costs had been payed. 2:11 Reloading the external machine guns wasn't much of an issue, as they were loaded with 500 rounds each, and unlike in the game the hull guns were set up to alternate between them with the first trigger pull firing the left, the second the right, third back to the left and so forth. Any failure not fixable by charging the mechanism *did* require someone to go out.
I saw that document about reloading speed. It tells only about autoloader automatic cycle. Yes it can do clear loading for 3 seconds. But game reloading is based on full cycle of shot-load. It means you must take in mind time needed for cannon recoil, shell extraction and returning whole system to zero-point before loading new round. Well in the end, this side of asS-tank is as accurate as it's possible.
The fences were actually there to destabilize kinetic rounds, and if you search SY Simulations (extremely good channel, I can only recommend) strv 103 kinetic round, you will see how much it does destabilize the kinetic round, it’s impressive. Btw those simulations are really accurate (he often shows historical photos of similar situations of penetration), except HEAT-FS that are apparently harder to render.
The 103D at 8.7 would be both amazingly good and amazingly bad if I'm being honest. It'll be amazing because 4 second reload coupled with thermals, better mobility and a bit of chem protection will be a step up from the 104C. Full downtiers to 7.7 would pretty much be a turkey shoot. It would also be a downright a crime against humanity because of the god awful hull aiming. The wedges are the only tanks I've driven where I literally pulled my hair out due to frustration. Trying to fight the reticle to even STAY on a stationary target, let alone a moving one, while you're on an incline is like fighting a pig covered in mud. It really feels like the reticle has a mind of its own. Using that against 9.7 tanks is unthinkable to me.
I read that in testing it could fire on the move (directly in front of it ofc) more accurately than contemporary turreted tanks. I feel like that fact should be a massive kick in the butt for Gaijin to fix the Stridsvagn 103's aiming but I guess they don't care that you can't aim this thing stationary when it's supposed to beat a Chieftain on the move.
It was seeing rough VHS Armén test footage of this tank in the mid 90s that first got me interested in Swedish arms in general and it has been a love affair ever since. Innovative and lateral thinking would be the words I would use to best describe the various weapon systems that have come out of Sweden. It's a country that's very dear to my heart and I used to visit regularly (a few times a year, and monthly visits at one point when I had a gf there), something that I sincerely hope to be able to do again soon, but let's just say that it's not the time to be the registered carer for a parent (I don't mean to gripe, but honestly the money I receive for doing it is pretty insulting, especially given that people like myself save the UK government billions of pounds a year, but I digress). Is the CV90 in WT? I have to admit that I became very focused on the naval game the last time I was playing and a great deal of what has been released for land and air has completely passed me by.
You should make a video on the ZTZ99A as I feel like its different (relative to how it felt on the dev server) now then when you played it in your last video on it
The two engines thing is the one that bothers me. Getting an engine disable, but being unable to rotate is so wrong. The tank was literally designed to deal with this situation.
could you elaborate what you mean with your first point "The Strv 103 can fire at a maximum of three rounds per second, not four." ? i assume you mean fire one round every 3 seconds not four but thats not quite what you said there
The thing is its low range heat missles with low damage. I hit ammo and it didnt get cooked I hate to face t54/t55s and tanks with era because ur rocket either doesnt do shit or minimal damage or the magic stalinium fuel tanks just absorb the damage.
@@popinmo Yah, but they only have a range of 2km which is in range of like every AA, they're also incredibly slow, the slowest missiles in the game, they really wouldn't do well at a higher BR. The saving grace is the heli has good power (unlike the next heli sweden gets)
It would be really cool if they added that prototype as Sweden do need some lower tiered vehicles that can compete with Russian ones in the same br with thermals and better night vision
It should also be noted that not only were the engines separate, their transmissions were as well. If you shot up one side of the engine-compartment, the other side was still functional and driveable.
I fucking wish they would add that feature I mean it can't be that bad or op ? I remember when they allowed the 103 to move left and right with either tracks or engines destroyed and it got removed...
@@adriancoric1721 wdym, my strv 103 still pivots when both tracks are gone
@@pz.vincesiqueiros7185 you can`t do a shit when your tracks are gone
@@fussia2568 I'll test it today in against a bot but I remember being able to pivot in aim mode if you got 2x tracked.
@@pz.vincesiqueiros7185 if one track is out you can still aim but really slowly, both tracks gone or engine and transmission destroyed, you can't turn left and right you can only aim up and down. So basically if you get immobilised you're dead like 80% of the time
Would be neat if some tanks did get illumination rounds for lower tier night battles
Yeah, 100500 useless mechanics and no light rockets.
@@WoWmakerWT lmao thats true
Please no, don't make me research illumination rounds and be able to get a night battle at like 3.7
night maps is one of reasons i stopped playing , and that sometimes you were forced to play same map , same night map 3 times in a row
less night matches, both low and high tier thanks
Also, the aiming was smooth AF compared to in-game
The jittering that came after they "fixed/remodeled" the aiming after the german 2gun tank is just driving me nuts i hate to play the strv now as it just doesn't aim properly
@@robertharris6092 God I hate that so much. It makes not having a stabilizer even more punishing.
@@kiri101 Maybe gaijin having their job to be not good developers
@@kiri101 i still remember the times when no one had a stab XD
drove one ?
If it was an Australian design you could call it Wedgemite
...... un-respectfully piss off
Shut
Get out
Slow clapping.
Meh
0:05 I'm assuming you meant "one round every 3 seconds", not "3 rounds per second"?
nah man, its an autocannon (yes)
@@kosa8350 is this the tank machine gun Spooksytun was talking about???
also its closer to 2.5s
3 rounds per second means 180 rounds per minute. That thing would fire faster than thr 40mm Bofors
50 BMG Machine Gun?
Hah, that lame
Swedish have 105mm Machine Gun
"So purchase and repair costs are higher than more conventional tanks."
Accurately describing the Swedish tech tree with that one.
yeah... ouch...
I feel the 2 engine thing would be cool where if it gets hit you can still move but a lot slower
German VT-1-2 still can turn after engine is out and with the same turn rate as usual, which is crazy. Also the hull aiming is so much better the on s-tanks.
Major things that need to be improved in the Strv 103 in game:
Two engines rather than one;
Loader can load rounds after breech is either damaged or 'destroyed';
Jerry cans have a chance of defusing HEATFS;
103Cs fence having a chance of destabilizing kinetic rounds.
IIRC the M4A2 doesn't have the engines separated either
@@ancaplanaoriginal5303 Time for Gaijin to get off their ass and fix it then!
I personally think that these unreliable mechanics with a chance to work won't improve the gameplay so the fence should get certain protection modifier against apfsds instead (that's for jerrycans too). Autoloader can't be destroyed in any way and let's keep it the way it is (and if gaijin adds autoloader destruction then do it for russians too i dare you gaijin). I'd love to get more dampening when hull aiming is active though.
also fixing its aiming.
oh wait they did that. three different fucking times. .-.
Loader can load breech even if damaged? This thing can operate on one crew, enough with the survability bullshit
Great video!
Just short, at 0:05 I guess it should be 1 round every 3 seconds? Even though the idea of an 105 with 180 rpm is hilarious.
I read that as 'rounds per minute' the first time! XD
@@TheSchultinatorlol, imagine if rpm stood for that. Not like it does, XD that would be silly
As a Swedish person im glad you made this spookston
@@velaikka ejjjj, och fan vad war thunder är så jävla kuuul
@@velaikka håller helt med
Me to
worst country on earth
@@L0K0M0T1V Ja såklart, men vi måste spränga borås
The Strv 103D would be great to have in war thunder, hope the snail adds it one day
Given that it is a prototype, it wouldn't surprise me if Gaijin add it as a premium/event vehicle.
The 103D looks like a Phlydaily thumbnail
@@coltpiecemaker i really hope not, but i guess better then nothing. The strv 103 was always held back by a lack of ERA and thermals IMO so the D would be a perfect capstone for one of my favorite tank lines.
@@khajaja I agree, the D would be a nice addition to an already great tank line which would add some new things and changes like better protection and thermals
This thing is definitely one of the most unique tanks I've seen, and it might be quite advantageous in Swedens terrain
That was the point of it, why they had a difficult time trying to sell the design to other countries because it basically only worked well in Sweden :)
@@velaikka I shouldn't have worded it as "might be advantageous" lmao
3 rounds a second?
BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM BAM
Machine gun 105mm
HSTVL got nothing on this bad boy
Typo, it's meant to be "one round every three seconds."
@@Spookston aaah ok I was confused cause I know it's a fast gun so I was like "3 a minute is too slow"
Aktchually the autoloader could even be pushed down to one round every two seconds but that had a chance of jamming the autoloader. Also the internal armour should be thicker if I'm not mistaken.
most autoloaders are limited for reliability so i'm not surprised
@@nicolaspeigne1429 I don't think it is a "Generic" auto loader reliability issue. The loader can be a 100% reliable but, there is a minimum time for certain things that must happen in sequence and any faster the machine jams because the spent casing can't eject any faster or the new round is moving too fast to line up with the breach. By over clocking the process, it eats into tolerances and breaks because you exceed elements require gravity which isn't going to change. 1 rnd every 2 seconds is crazy fast.
In the video, it says, "3 rounds per second, instead of 4" and 4 rounds per second, is like 0.25 sec reload.
@@oohhboy-funhouse this autoloader is faster than most because the canon doesn't move, so it's much simpler.
What i said is most autoloader are capable to be faster than what they are limited to, for the same reasons you cited.
The time to load was ~2.5 sec, this made it possible to select type of round to use after the target has been acquired without any loss of time to engage.
In fact the gun do not reload after each shot automatically, the gunner need to press HE or AP for it to reload each time.
Did my military service on the 103 in Sweden as an technician so I have actually drive it and engage targets with laser practice equipment, and it was really smooth to aim.
I think Stefan Karlsson also said that the STRV 103 could raise one side of its suspension so it could shoot in a slope more accurately.
Next a what if the Leclerc was historically accurate could be interesting!
_"The Leclerc's crew has a 99% chance of surrendering upon coming in contact with the enemy."_
Source: Erwin Rommel
@@TR33ZY_CRTM Yea I also read that when Leclerc crews were faced with early Leopard 2s they would give up a lot of the time especially in North Africa where they were not used to fighting the Japanese.
@@TR33ZY_CRTM Imagine laughing at French people in 2022 because their government (mainly Pétain) were cowards in 1940. Pathetic
I would love to see it in game that the if the engine gets shot and 1 survives the strv can still move somewhat it would add to its survivability and shooting it in the engine/transmission doesn't mean it's effectively taken out, I think it would be a good addition and makes them even more unique like them surviving with only 1 crew member
"A crew member must exit the vehicle to reload the external machine guns" Apply this to every tank that has a pintle mounted gun
Three rounds per second? O.o
I kinda wish that the fact it has two engines was sort of modeled in game. Well, at least when it takes one engine hit it still can turn around and aim until 2nd hit is dealt or something like that. Would help it out a lot giving it any fighting back capabilities.
Gajin should go through your "vehicles that should be added in warthunder" video and just add every one
0:05 good grief give the STRV some privacy!
I would also note that the strv103D also had composite armor blocks
0:11 three rounds PER SECOND?! Wow
For the Swedish military military never being involved in a modern enough War to have tanks they sure know how to make a really good tank
Its such a unique vehicle ngl, and it looks kinda cool
I honestly would love to see another S tank in game it's one of my favorite tanks though I would also like to see them add the engine detail since it would actually make the S tank more viable in war thunder
i love these videos so mucha nd im really glad you always link the sources i love reading about stuff like this.
Amazing video. How much time does it usually take to get all of this info?
The cannon is actually considered an autocannon with 2,5 seconds reload. Practical fire rate is estimated around 4,5 seconds due to dust kicking up and so on. But you could hold the fire button and reload button at the same time to fire it automatically with 2,5 sec between shots.
YES! I've been waiting for such a video for so long, thank you thank you thank you!❤️❤️ (swedish main here)
Mostly pros for the tank on this one! Nice job man!
There were some cons like engine repair taking more time, but if they actually allowed the thing to run on one destroyed engine i would happily accept the increased repair time
next:
if war thunder's sturmtiger was historically accurate
Great content as always
0:54 This isn't quite right. The piston engine powers the hydraulic pumps, which control both the suspension and the steering input to the final drives. If you lose the piston engine you can still drive around with just the turbine, but you have to use the emergency steering system, which is just a pair of clutch-brake steering levers, and you don't have any elevation control at all. The hydraulics also power the normal brakes, so to brake when the piston engine isn't running you need to use the steering levers or the parking brake.
(Source: manual for the strv 103B, part 2 ("Fordon"), page 86 and on)
Where I can find manual for strv103?no matter which one version
@@SwainEzCarry google
The double engine thing sounds like a maintenance nightmare
Its short track length also made it a beast in really rough terrain. It could go where other tanks could not.
Its a full 10 calibres bigger than a standard L7 which made the effectivness substantial. Not slightly. As proven when fired upon Soviet tanks procured from east germany after the fall of the berlin wall in the early 90s.
Otherwise great stuff.
Im a fan of the 103 and this was very pleasing to watch
Do you think you’ll do a “how bad was this” video for the 103?
im glad to see spookston covered one of my favorite tanks
0:31 There were 10.5 cm illumination rounds available already in the 1940's. What the 103C got was two external Lyran illumination discharger tubes (small mortars) with about 1.5 km range.
1:43 The British L7 had a barrel of L52 calibres, while the barrel in the S-tank was 62L calibres, so more than 20% longer.
1:57 The main part of the procurement was the R&D needed, not building the actual tanks. Once bought, the R&D costs had been payed.
2:11 Reloading the external machine guns wasn't much of an issue, as they were loaded with 500 rounds each, and unlike in the game the hull guns were set up to alternate between them with the first trigger pull firing the left, the second the right, third back to the left and so forth. Any failure not fixable by charging the mechanism *did* require someone to go out.
I saw that document about reloading speed. It tells only about autoloader automatic cycle. Yes it can do clear loading for 3 seconds. But game reloading is based on full cycle of shot-load.
It means you must take in mind time needed for cannon recoil, shell extraction and returning whole system to zero-point before loading new round.
Well in the end, this side of asS-tank is as accurate as it's possible.
The fences were actually there to destabilize kinetic rounds, and if you search SY Simulations (extremely good channel, I can only recommend) strv 103 kinetic round, you will see how much it does destabilize the kinetic round, it’s impressive.
Btw those simulations are really accurate (he often shows historical photos of similar situations of penetration), except HEAT-FS that are apparently harder to render.
even at a higher cost, it seems like a well-rounded (despite being a wedge) piece of equipment. I'd definitely want a few of these in my arsenal
Gave me so many reasons more to love this tank.
What you said about amphibious is stupid. That would imply that the Leopard also can be made water proof up to 5 or so metres „with preparation“.
I just wish the aiming was as smooth as in WoT.
The tank museum in Northern Virginia has two of these and it’s cool to watch them play with it during their open house
That's really cool. I didn't know of any others existing except at ARSENALEN and I think there was one in England(but not shure)
3 rounds per second, now thats impressive
God I love this vehicle. I pray it never gets up-tiered because it is slept on at its br.
Please do one on the Chieftains/Challengers. I feel like theres a lot to say.
The 103D at 8.7 would be both amazingly good and amazingly bad if I'm being honest.
It'll be amazing because 4 second reload coupled with thermals, better mobility and a bit of chem protection will be a step up from the 104C. Full downtiers to 7.7 would pretty much be a turkey shoot.
It would also be a downright a crime against humanity because of the god awful hull aiming. The wedges are the only tanks I've driven where I literally pulled my hair out due to frustration. Trying to fight the reticle to even STAY on a stationary target, let alone a moving one, while you're on an incline is like fighting a pig covered in mud. It really feels like the reticle has a mind of its own. Using that against 9.7 tanks is unthinkable to me.
Im kind of hoping if we ever get the 103D it will get some advanced ammo and go at 9.3/9.7. Top tier cheese wedge my beloved
3 rounds per second, holy jesus thats fast :O
i just wish gaijin would fix the jaggy control of the hull aiming, it really shouldnt be hard
3 shots a sec? This isn't an auto cannon-
Great video, these are always fun to watch, even tho I don't think the strv103 can fire three rounds per second because that would be kinda op :)
I'm hoping that they add the 103D. I love the Strv103
Fun fact: the rear armour will happily eat the long 88s APHE shells but not the APCR.
I mean APCR has more pen anyway. But i get what you saying.
It's nice when the main tank repping your nation has one of these videos and it's not filled with cons lol.
ofcourse it has no cons, its a very perfect tank, totally no flaws
"the tank can actually aim properly and doesnt wobble around like a piece of shit"
Almost to 200k! You gonna do another Qna?
Do a Historically Accurate vid about shells i know It's gonna be short but it'll be interesting.
I read that in testing it could fire on the move (directly in front of it ofc) more accurately than contemporary turreted tanks. I feel like that fact should be a massive kick in the butt for Gaijin to fix the Stridsvagn 103's aiming but I guess they don't care that you can't aim this thing stationary when it's supposed to beat a Chieftain on the move.
Dude you're so close to 200k subs
Three rounds per Second?
hey spookston can you take a look at the LVTEX-3 fighting vehicle? it can mount a sheridan turret with a 105mm gun
gaijin needs to fix that tank! make Sweden great again! and the strv 103 D needs to be added as a event or tech tree vehicle!
It was seeing rough VHS Armén test footage of this tank in the mid 90s that first got me interested in Swedish arms in general and it has been a love affair ever since.
Innovative and lateral thinking would be the words I would use to best describe the various weapon systems that have come out of Sweden.
It's a country that's very dear to my heart and I used to visit regularly (a few times a year, and monthly visits at one point when I had a gf there), something that I sincerely hope to be able to do again soon, but let's just say that it's not the time to be the registered carer for a parent (I don't mean to gripe, but honestly the money I receive for doing it is pretty insulting, especially given that people like myself save the UK government billions of pounds a year, but I digress).
Is the CV90 in WT? I have to admit that I became very focused on the naval game the last time I was playing and a great deal of what has been released for land and air has completely passed me by.
I‘m not quite sure on those fire rates, Spook. I mean even 3 per second is quite impressive!
I hope we get the D model at some point
You should make a video on the ZTZ99A as I feel like its different (relative to how it felt on the dev server) now then when you played it in your last video on it
I'd LOOOOOVE for it the be counted as an amphibious vehicle
Amphibious vehicles are my favorite and there are so few in the game
3 shells per second. Damn, nice autoloader
The two engines thing is the one that bothers me. Getting an engine disable, but being unable to rotate is so wrong. The tank was literally designed to deal with this situation.
Will you ever do another video where you review fictional vehicles like your halo vids?
0:10 "3 rounds per second." *Swedish death metal music starts*
Love the odst rain at the end
Heres a another inaccuracy
The suspension should work with the dozerblade ingame
Ingame it says suspension blocked
would love to have an episode talking about the Italian F104's
The 103D also had additional composite armor on the actual tank to better protect against kinetic rounds.
Surprisingly few negatives when compared to other tanks of the era.
What a beautiful tank
And gaijin already make it expensive :,p
Ooo the low light rounds are cool
Oooh oh oooh
Do the BMP-everyone of them
Next
Ah yes, *"3 ROUNDS PER SECOND, NOT 4"* Honestly quite incredible 105mm autocannon.
What you're saying is, this tank is even cooler than I thought it was
could you elaborate what you mean with your first point "The Strv 103 can fire at a maximum of three rounds per second, not four." ? i assume you mean fire one round every 3 seconds not four but thats not quite what you said there
i hope they have stridsvagn 103 skin for ramps in racing games
Well if it could be amphibious after PREPARATION, maybe the in-game tank just wasn’t prepared.
Can we get one for the Japanese Type 89? I get that military documents from Japan are hard to translate and use, but I'd love to see one!
3 rounds per second? That's like 180 rounds per minute.
the amphibious mode for the strv requires a floating screen and we dont got non o those in war thunder
Well I wouldn't mind a tank firing three rounds per second.
Ah yes, *Burst fire 105mm cannon.*
The amphibious part made me laugh really hard lmao. Just plummets.
Huh just noticed TH-cam unsubbed me, fixing that.
0:53 I've been complaining about the seperate engines for months
Damn, able to fire three rounds per second? That's pretty impressive!
I just watched this mini series for the halo music
You should do a video on Sweden's super low br atgm heli it's insane as a us tech players getting atgms at 8.7 vs Sweden at 7.7
The thing is its low range heat missles with low damage. I hit ammo and it didnt get cooked I hate to face t54/t55s and tanks with era because ur rocket either doesnt do shit or minimal damage or the magic stalinium fuel tanks just absorb the damage.
@@kh5736 yea but you have 6 and at 7.7 if you get down tiered it's 6.0 tanks vs 6 rockets
@@popinmo Yah, but they only have a range of 2km which is in range of like every AA, they're also incredibly slow, the slowest missiles in the game, they really wouldn't do well at a higher BR. The saving grace is the heli has good power (unlike the next heli sweden gets)
@@pinkycatcher still probably good or the low br it's at
It would be really cool if they added that prototype as Sweden do need some lower tiered vehicles that can compete with Russian ones in the same br with thermals and better night vision