For reference, the two main motifs were taken from Pachelbel's Fantasia in D Minor. th-cam.com/video/HXfVxzeDmGA/w-d-xo.html Right there at the beginning, you don't need to listen to all of it.
I think the Allegro was inspire by Pachelbel's Fantasia in D Minor. The two main motifs, which are found throughout the whole piece, are found in Pachelbel's work: th-cam.com/video/HXfVxzeDmGA/w-d-xo.html Right there at the beginning, you don't need to listen to all of it. This is typical Bach: The original was already nice to listen to, but he made it even better, much better actually.
They're called accelerando's and rallentando's. Bach is very rarely played in strict metronome tempo. In fact, Bach never wrote tempo marks on his handschriften, AFAIA. Even greats like Gould rarely played in strict tempo.
It's actually an F and it's because in the stop she's using, the fifth is louder than the actual note being played; but if you listen carefully, you can hear the Bb underneath it. Interestingly, once the 16th notes start, the sound seems to "morph" so that the written note becomes the louder pitch. I'd be interested to have this explained by someone who understands organs better than I. Edit: Upon further examination, it seems that the fifth becomes louder when the note is sustained, which is why it is less noticeable in the 16th and 8th notes
the quality of the image is much better when the notes don't move and it's our eyes and head that move to follow the notes, or the text ( like when we read text printed on the page of a book) So in my opinion these videos would work much better if the speed in which the measures pass were constant. Who cares about the red line. This videos will be watched by people who can read music, so we don't need a red line. Only that the notes played get more or less in the middle of the video frame. That's all.
Gerubach's videos are a great resource for me, as I still cannot read music very well. The red line tells me exactly where I need to look. There are many, many other videos from different channels, which show a non-rolling score. This one stands out for people like me.
美しいの一言に尽きます。悲しい時も苦しい時も、この動画が助けてくれました。私が生きている間はこのチャンネルはなくならないで。
Beautifully played, and so well-recorded. The sound is incisive and clear. A pleasure to listen to.
all of her recordings are JUST spectacular... her Liszt CD is one of the VERY best of his major works... and this... goodness...!!!
Bravo! Excellent performance!
Yeah bruh you are dead though. Korky Bucek bing bang song is better.
@@boratsagdiyev109 🤨
@@boratsagdiyev109 So what are you doing here? You are out of place.
This is really really beautiful.
C'est vraiment génial Bach !
Probably my 2nd favourite triosonata, next to the 3rd one, which I'm happy to know that you're gonna do next.
This is MY FAVORITE... then No 3... ALTHOUGH... No 3... IS SPECTACULAR... goosebumps sooo!!!
Bach is the greatest! No one compares to him.
Agreed. Not Beethoven either
Telemann ? Scarlatti ?
No... Finally you are right...
@@Bibibolobobolobibipiopi0 Who's Telemann???
@@gottfriedwilhelmvonleibniz9033 You are really missing something if you dont know him. He is greate.
Marvelous.
just lovely playing...
The tuning of organ? I like the sound of it. Well matched with Bach's piece
Beautiful!
That is so beautiful, but you almost never hear it played. Bravo!
¡Fascinante¡, ¡Enorme trabajo¡
Awesome! :)
I would suggest the one played by
Claudio Brizi
It’s in the album
Il gusto italiano
Bravo bravo bravo
Anyone else hear the overtone fifth on the top voice as the dominant pitch in the Largo?
yes, is it registrated like that: 8/4/3 ft.
@@engelbertschoormans The twelfth is a 2 2/3 foot rank but yea it's in there
Yes!! I hate that!! WHY is it there!!?? 😡
Flo Pérez. Humor. It's called a cornet and it brings color and brilliance to a part that otherwise would sound too flat and somehow boring.
Perfection!
precioso
8:14 Onwards, critical insight into Bach's methodology.
10:14
Marie-Claire Alain did two recordings of Bach's works. Is this the one from the early recordings, or the later recordings?
*three recordings. Sounds like the 1980, perhaps?
For a bit there, starting at 9:20 , I thought I was listening to Scarlatti and not bach.
For reference, the two main motifs were taken from Pachelbel's Fantasia in D Minor.
th-cam.com/video/HXfVxzeDmGA/w-d-xo.html
Right there at the beginning, you don't need to listen to all of it.
I think the Allegro was inspire by Pachelbel's Fantasia in D Minor.
The two main motifs, which are found throughout the whole piece, are found in Pachelbel's work:
th-cam.com/video/HXfVxzeDmGA/w-d-xo.html
Right there at the beginning, you don't need to listen to all of it.
This is typical Bach: The original was already nice to listen to, but he made it even better, much better actually.
what's that time signature in the third movement?
Erik Ryde maybe 2/2?
Cut time
Sounds very modern for it's time
I wonder how the video would be with my version of BWV 526 :)
upload and and do the score scroll thing... I listen... (my FAVORITE trio...)
anyone notice the drastic tempo changes?
I lived with it quite welll
They're called accelerando's and rallentando's. Bach is very rarely played in strict metronome tempo. In fact, Bach never wrote tempo marks on his handschriften, AFAIA. Even greats like Gould rarely played in strict tempo.
0:21
3:56 are we going to ignore that there is a wrong note in the middle part? (plays Ab instead of Bb)
Am I wrong??
Probably tuned to alower pitch voice
It's actually an F and it's because in the stop she's using, the fifth is louder than the actual note being played; but if you listen carefully, you can hear the Bb underneath it. Interestingly, once the 16th notes start, the sound seems to "morph" so that the written note becomes the louder pitch. I'd be interested to have this explained by someone who understands organs better than I.
Edit: Upon further examination, it seems that the fifth becomes louder when the note is sustained, which is why it is less noticeable in the 16th and 8th notes
it´s so complex
the quality of the image is much better when the notes don't move and it's our eyes and head that move to follow the notes, or the text ( like when we read text printed on the page of a book) So in my opinion these videos would work much better if the speed in which the measures pass were constant. Who cares about the red line. This videos will be watched by people who can read music, so we don't need a red line. Only that the notes played get more or less in the middle of the video frame. That's all.
Absolutely agree!
Gerubach's videos are a great resource for me, as I still cannot read music very well.
The red line tells me exactly where I need to look.
There are many, many other videos from different channels, which show a non-rolling score.
This one stands out for people like me.
much too fast