EU accuses UK of breaking international law over plans to change Brexit deal
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 มิ.ย. 2022
- The rift between the government and the EU has widened again, as Foreign Secretary Liz Truss published plans to unilaterally change the Northern Ireland Protocol.
(Subscribe: bit.ly/C4_News_Subscribe)
The prime minister insisted it was "no big deal" but was necessary to keep Northern Ireland's status in the United Kingdom.
But the EU thinks it is a big deal, insisting unilateral action is very damaging. The Irish prime minister said that it was a new low point for the UK to renege on an international treaty.
-----------------------
Follow us on Instagram - / channel4news
![[Full Episode] MasterChef Junior Thailand มาสเตอร์เชฟ จูเนียร์ ประเทศไทย Season 3 Episode 5](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/g5wpgeAIzMs/mqdefault.jpg)
If it's all no big deal and so simple, why wasn't this proposed 3 years ago?
Exactly, and if it doesn’t work there’s already art.16, which is specifically designed to be used in this type of situations.
The real issue is that the protocol is working great, just look at the NI economy. But if NI is flourishing in the single market, what does that mean for Brexit ?????
See THAT’S why the protocol “is not working” and they now want to drag NI back into the Brexit damage zone
@@nicodesmidt4034 That is the problem with using article 16, there would need to be an actual problem to address. There isn't.
Because he and his Leave cohorts in 2016 lied to get Brexit, he and his new government in 2019 lied through their teeth to 'get Brexit done', knowing fine well they'd say anything to ram through what they wanted and not stick to it down the line, which is what we're seeing today. Britain has been diminished on the world stage as being led by liars, tarnishing our reputation. How utterly shameful.
Cuz der was an election.
@@nicodesmidt4034 Absolutely spot on, NI having such a booming economy during Brexit makes the rest of the UK look bad so BoJo and co. want to drag it down with them
I'm beginning to think they lied to the people who voted for Brexit.
🤭
Adam Grimsley haha when do they not lie
Never... do you really like
Our upstanding politicians would do such a thing?
Didnt care. In 1993 when i was living in europe i wanted the UK to leave the EU.
Before the Maastricht treaty.
And i had been living in europe 7 years by then and gauged the fuckover a comin.
They absolutely did!
If I ever break the law I'll just say I was removing bureaucratic barriers...
Doesn't he realize how messed up it sounds?🤦♂️🤦♂️
which specific law have you in mind?
Which specific law? please don't whine about the non-existent and fictitious international law, because there is no such thing
what exactly is "international law"?
what particular law have you in mind titch? I use will whimpering and whining about your thrice thrashing? You federalists seem to be masochists that you wish to delight those who thrashed you three times in a row. Why do you seek to please those that crushed you under their heel?
They will investigate themselves and find they need a pay rise.
Meanwhile, you suffer.
Exactly
Do you know why
I suffer ?
I tell you why
It's
By design
So that when the time comes
I wld do my duty
Without hesitation
Remorse
Or
Sorrow
They're savages
& Must be
Civilized
I was very bad & ugly
They didn't like me
So now
I will be
🙄
Very good
& Pretty
😌
“It’s not a big deal”
I’m just breaking the law again.
funny thing, its international law, and the world is looking at him!
and get the msg from BoJO the clown..
" we do what I want "
Seemingly that maters not in the least
So what?
Well if he continually gets away with it, you can't be surprised that he'll keep doing it!
speeding or parking on a double yellow line is " breaking the law" but few go into paroxysms of sanctimonious rectitude about those things', you are trying to make something out of nothing titch you are that desperate.
Will the British government ever get tired of making life difficult for the people of Ireland ?
not just ireland, everyone in the uk to
@@aidan-4759 time to kill the Tori’s
It's their default setting.
No, in fact we're going into Ireland to den zify it. Ireland was created by England anyway.
@M Hynds Rats are always the first to desert the ship
The UK is finished. Big mistake BoJo.
Agreed
Nah
The UK could very well start legally unraveling in 2024 if Scotland gets its way towards the end of next year.
@@RazorMouth We're trying, believe me we're trying 👏
@@RazorMouth What are you on about, the majority of Scotland doesn't want independence, if Scotland gets it's way in 2024 Scotland will still remain in the UK...
Why did he sign it then? Nobody will trust us now. No serious politician would act like that.
Trust you now. What's now got to do with it.
And the next winning lottery numbers are?
He won the votes that what's all about,
He signed it just to get us out from the EU.
"Us" being you and who else specifically?
It’s public knowledge that Johnson intended to tear up the agreement at a later date. It’s a later date.
😂😂🤫got to luv❤️ the British
@@wayneabel5421 pirate nation.
@@zonecc6770 privateers* 🧐
Does this mean mean that Boris Johnson is not a man of his word? Simply stunned. Somebody should tell his former wives, cabinet colleagues, former employers, fellow MP's and every Tory voter in the UK.
That makes sense because it gives the UK time to develop other markets and the EU then becomes less relevant?
In decades to come Johnson’s picture will be up there with Michael Collins, Eamon De Valera, Bobby Sands and Martin McGuiness as one who help make a United Ireland possible.
Personally I can imagine nothing more desirable than a United Ireland and if that could be accompanied by an independent Scotland thus leaving only England, then so much the better
on a plaque outside "The Rev Ian Paisley School for the deaf"
@@vhawk1951kl Wales: What am I? Chopped liver?
And the next winning lottery numbers are?
Bless you!!!
Yet another reason to not ever take Johnson at his word, ever. He claimed that the Brexit deal that he said was "oven ready," during the 2019 General Election campaign, but it turned out to be anything but. The truth is, in the times we're in, we need to pick our fights, it shouldn't be with our closest trading partner, the EU. Trade wars never end well, they only succeed in driving the already climbing prices ever higher 🤦♂️
You are correct, it was not a good deal at all. So, why not seek change and lets get it right this time.
@@perfectstorm7379 think the EU have had enough of Doris negotiations with that clown are done ..
You can't seriously think the EU would sign any deal with this government after this ..
Ffs They are not total idiots 🙄
They worked well for china
@@firstname4865 in driving already high prices up, yes, which is why we shouldn't engage in that sort of thing
@@mikedon5205 the EU and it’s constituent enslaved countries regularly break international agreements.
What absolute nonsense from a law breaking liar... 😡😡😡
You mean Johnson I presume?
@@nicodesmidt4034 obviously!
That's right Brussells have lied to just about every nation that ever joined. Including about its eventual trajectory to a United States of Europe with Brussels autonomy. It was bound to end in tears
@@colinporter7108 So that means the UK has lied as it was the EU at the time. It got what it wanted in about 95% of the decisions.
@@colinporter7108
The Northern Ireland Protocol Bill, aims to “disapply the Customs code.” But goods will go from Northern Ireland to the Republic. So could the PM please explain where he is proposing to put the customs border? And preserve the Good Friday Agreement
UK gives Ireland lots of freebies. Keeps them in Ireland n over ml uk
The UK does not want a border in Ireland. The Irish Republic also does not want a border in Ireland the only body that insists on a border is the EU.
@@alangardner8596 No, that's what's required because the UK wanted Brexit; we can't keep moving goal posts every time Johnson is under pressure at home. The only solution is for the UK to re-join the Single Market. Otherwise we will be back here in 2 months time with the Tory's threatening to break international law again.
@@ciaranbrk The UK will never rejoin the EU.
The agreement with the EU is not an international law, it is an agreement written into law by all involved that does not make it an international law.
In that trade agreement as in most trade agreements there are clauses that say that any dispute has to be negotiated in good faith by both party's and this the EU has refused to do therefore the EU is in breach of the agreement.
According to international law any trade agreement can be terminated legally if one party acts in bad faith.
@@alangardner8596 Your stupid lies just show how low your IQ is.
He agreed to those bureaucratic rules, if he seeks to amend the rules, he admits he didn't have a clue what he was doing. He can't blame anyone else but himself.
He can blame the eu for using the agreement to tear Ireland apart! If it treated NI the same as the rest of the world , there would be no problem. !! Why the ridiculous amount of checks on incoming goods ? Far in excess of any other eu country ! And DONT forget, the eu threatened to implement article 16 to help them steal the UKs vaccines ! Now that would have been a real breach of International law , not a made up one !!Northern Ireland Protocol checks ‘equate to 20% of total undertaken by EU’
There are clauses everywhere to enhance or chuck just EU plays hard ball.. Dying EU
@@joprocter4573 The EU has done nothing but bend over backwards to help sort it all out But Boris Johnson has caused all this trouble he hasn't a clue what he's doing, and it's ONLY the brit NATzi's in N.I that are shouting about it.
N.I are profiting from being in the EU still and the EU is certainly not dying boris has that tied to the uk the uk is dying the world is laughing at us
It's a bit like Ursula Va de Crazy sanctioning the EU by cutting cheap energy.
Did he ever had a clue through is life? Thats the question.
Take example of the measures proposed last week to help people to buy houses.
Another example of an undercooked solution, like all of them.
Mr B.S Johnson has no clue.
"Serial liar and convicted lawbreaker breaks agreement to please elderly Little Englanders and small group of oddball extremists in island aforementioned Little Englanders have never visited and don't want."
There, fixed it for you, Channel 4. Although, hmmm, your segment title - though less literally accurate - is shorter than mine. Okay, let's keep your title for now.
Degree in ignorance
@@joprocter4573 Congratulations, Jo! I'm sure you worked very hard for it.
Meanwhile, perhaps you'll allow people like me - born in the Republic, lived in a Border town and community, grew up in The Troubles, lived and worked in England, now live and work in another Border town, this time in Northern Ireland (where even the building my flat is in was damaged in a terrorist blast) - to have An Opinion, one shaped by 50+ years of Border-lived experience?
But then, what could I know, compared to Jo, and their degree in ignorance, eh!
Boris is a REMAINER
@@vercoda9997 Haven't you got a bbc have your say forum to be going to?
@@ChristianPatriarchy The two don't have the same connotation at all. Are you seriously trying to claim that you don't know the broad range that 'Little Englander' represents, and that you somehow think it's directly comparable with an Irish Nationalist? Seriously?
That's unfortunate; I'm embarrassed for you, there. Please try learning a little, it's probably still not too late.
Long past time for a united Ireland. Get Johnson done!
🇮🇪🤤
Liz and Boris, and you still expect to sign a free trade deal with the USA, dream on
I think we've long understood that we will ultimately have to end our negotiation with the USA at least until that geriatric has gone. By that time our interests will have moved on . Supply and demand and all that.
@@colinporter7108 We?
Maybe they can if Trump wins back the Presidency and Bunter wins another term. He did after all promise to cut a deal for his friend ‘Britain Trump’. Whether such a deal would do much for Britain remains to be seen.
Don’t expect anything from Joe Biden, he expects kick-backs.
We already are at State level where 90% of trade is carried out as opposed to through the federal level. 5 state deals already signed and 15 more on the way. Do you actually follow or understand current world events or do you rely on the main stream media lol? Oh and just in case you had not noticed Biden is about to lose control of the Senate and House, the bumbling idiot in the Whitehouse is the most unpopular President in the last 70 years the Yanks have finally woken up and realised how adroit and smart Trump was and looks like he will get re elected.
He doesn't want Northern Ireland to have the best economy in the UK because this will prove what a flop Brexit was.
Well said! They do not want to let the Northern Irish to flourish. What do you expect from a rogue government and trouble maker
NI is subsidised by the UK.
The UK is subsidising Ireland Healthcare.
@@tedb5432 ......nonsense. The UK has nothing to do with Ireland. .....For 101 years now,
NI had the best economy because it was trafficking people, that lorry story with the Chinese was the tip of the iceberg. Huge criminality courtesy of Ms Clinton and the Ukraine.
Given that secession or what some imbeciles call brexit has brought about the holy grail of the abolition of unemployment in the United Kingdom I would suggest that secession from the euphemistic union was a remarkably sensible and wise thing to do anyway it is done and that is the end of it. United Kingdom is no longer a member of the EU Federation.
Welcome to North-Korea-on-Thames
Calm down.
@@susannamarker2582 That is the calm version!
What? Is the unelected and un-democratic House of Lords trying to foil the will of the People and their elected House of Commons? How disgraceful! Indeed reminiscent of North Korea.
@@charleswhite758 The House of Lords doesn't need to be elected. Ireland's upper house isn't.
@@susannamarker2582 Many people in the UK are starting to think that the time of unelected big-wigs setting our laws should end. Don't you like democracy?
Let's be clear, this is breaking international law. You can dress it up as "necessity" but it subverts the agreement and put the TCA in jeopardy. To clarify that implication, we know that Brexit deal cost us about 4% GDP annually, a no deal would increase that to 10%.
I know that some people don't give a damn about NI, but this impacts their pockets and people tend to care about that.
For serious
Well China does it all the time! Say that to them!!
@@santhanaraj5863 It is often said to China. However, the UK is supposed to be above this sort of thing.
There is no such thing as "international law", if only for want of an "international sovereign", and there is a shortage of international sovereigns to the tune of any-at-all.
@@stephenconway2468 I think UK has learned from China how to deal with EU!
It was predictable UK was not going to respect any agreement.
Oh but the EU are respectable - yeah right. Boris Johnson is not fit for purpose but neither is the EU. We are all doomed whichever way we turn. Rules for this, rules for that and rules are made to be broken, ask BJ.
Clauses in every paragraph for alter or change bits not working
@@sparrow_6177 how is it the EU’s fault that Boris signed the deal. And who would be dumb enough to get the U.K. to vote for trade with the EU as a third country.
Almost certainly because there is nothing anyone can do about it whether it does or not.
that is merely whining is it not?
Why do you federalists wine so? you are like whipped curs; mind you it was good fun whipping you and it was not just once or twice that you were defeated by the secessionists we defeated you three times in a row. Are you still squealing like stuck pigs over your thrice thrashing?
Despicable.....
Couldn't agree more - the EU has acted in bad faith since day one.
Anyone who thinks that a PM who has total contempt for rules and laws in his own country, especially his own laws, is delusional to think that Johnson can do the same on the international stage and get away with it.
he will get away with it, but the UK not.....!
"the international stage" is imaginary.
He's a new yorker , like t rump , they do it their way !
@@vhawk1951kl Obviously you don´t live abroad.
He can because(to quote from Crocodile Dundee - II) he has a Donk and there is fcuk all you mice can do about that beforeMay2024, whereupon you may have all the tantrums you please
Johnson would dig up Prince Philip and know him biblically on live TV if he thoyght it would help him stay PM.
@Christina Evans Funny how people don't often talk about that.
There is quite a few freaks on the Labour benches that would give it a go, for the enjoyment though, not the power.
boris 2024/25 is coming
@@bertiescunsbutch9323 starmer is definitely one of them
Ahh come off it. No need for that, use another analagy
A lie doesn’t become truth wrong doesn’t become right , and evil doesn’t become good just because it’s accepted by a majority
It does in the EU.
@@joemdee This is the Tory Brexit shitshow, the EU are on the right side of this argument...
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@joemdee brexturds are so dumb it's funny and sad 😂😞
History would beg to differ
"No Biggie" kind of how BoJo views his marriage vows.
Not be surprised if he gets divorced when he leaves office, be his 3rd, a leopard never changes it's spots.
How do you know he made any marriage vows.
There is nothing to prevent Parliament from doing as it pleases, and since for all practical purposes the majority in Parliament *is* Parliament and the majority of Parliament is led by the Prime Minister Mr Johnson, Mr Johnson may do as he pleases regardless of any religious mumbo-jumbo.
@@vhawk1951kl You regard marriage vows as "religious mumbo-jumbo"?
@@brioquery ones which are legally binding...
Pish that is just whining and sanctimonious priggery and whining to boot.
The DUP will have to find something else now to avoid playing 2nd fiddle to Sinn Fein, thats what this has ALL been about.
No but its worth a try now you mention it.. Michelle got a job once previous ni democratic vote actioned but Mary lou no Ireland keep her
Wrong this is about Boris and Westminster having to be forced to act like Northern Ireland is part of the United Kingdom. SF are marxists and republicanism is a flag of convenience. Also If the border was at the Irish border instead of the middle of Irish sea they would be up in arms, no pun intended. The Protocol is threatening the Good Friday Agreement Principle of Consent - every Unionist elected in last month's election wanted the end of the Protocol. The cost to business here is £millions just for the administration of goods coming in. Ireland is not to be involved in legislation in Northern Irelend.
You do not understand the Stormont accord then it is run through consent. I suggest you actually understand how itruns and go and educate yourself.
@@hminchella7423 from the outside looking in it very much looks like that the DUP barely tolerated the GFA when they were the biggest party, but now have no quams about scuppering it now that they are not. They want the protocol scrapped (which lets not forget was to try and mitigate the hard Brexit which NI didnt vote for in any form) but have not clearly said what should replace it. Brexit is not compatible with the GFA, indeed the SM and Customs Union made the GFA possible. Personally I think that Bodge Jobson would rather ditch it because NI has been a fly in the ointment of his Brexit fantasy (which he doesnt even believe in - it was purely a political vehicle for him), he’d be happy for a hard border and not care about the consequences. The DUP have been DUPed by him and they cant even see that for themselves.
@@sionnachrealta5534 Will the DUP be playing second fiddle to Sinn Fein or is governance run through consent of all parties????????? Also there is most definitely a Stormont accord.
Sunlight uplands?
More like sunset of the Union.
Good.
@@kirishima638 As a Scotsman I could not agree more.
@@stephenfowlie742 As an Englishmen I second that.
@@stephenfowlie742 Ditto, 'mon the referendum!
An end for which most devoutly and fervently to pray
"The British government wants to be able to do what it wants" - sums up the Tory's Brexit in a nutshell: 'We'll leave the EU and get out of the Tax Avoidance Directive, then they'll let us keep things pretty much the way they are now, they have to, we're a really important country... What do you mean 'a Third Country'?!"
Turd country 🤣🤣🤣
You have no idea what you’re talking about. And that rubbish about the tax directive has been thoroughly debunked. The EU has its own tax havens of Ireland Holland Luxembourg etc
@@mogznwaz Who thoroughly debunked it? Supply the source of your information please!
The UK is *no longer* a member of the EU federation is it not?
Therefore the impotent little committee of insignificant little bureaucratic burghers is of no account because it is impotent.
@@mogznwaz Pandora papers? Grow up, you're all corrupt AF
No wages for the people who refuse to work for the people! NO WAGES CHANGES MINDS IMMEDIATELY!
How do you propose to implement that?
@@BernasLL you don’t
Well, as long as Ireland is part of the EU, you can have an open border between Ireland and NI, or you can can have an open border between NI and the rest of the UK, but you can’t have both. Not without having an open border between the UK and the EU, which I presume defeats the purpose of this whole mess. So unless he is secretly planning to annex Ireland, it would behoove the PM not to sell the voters impossible things that can not exist for reasons of simple geography.
He will move the army to NI for exercises. Then he will invade Ireland and liberate it from neo nazis and nationalists.
Oh dear you are one very deluded individual. There has been an open border and travel arrangements long before the EU existed and there will be one long after the EU has faded into a long distant odious memory.
It’s Europe that wants a hard border between north and south. They’ve been threatening that the whole time. Not the uk. Who’s the problem again?
@Christina Evans the tories literally talked about causing a famine in ireland by breaking trade to drag ireland out of the EU as well. somehow. I don't know how they make this up.
You talk as if the UK is the only side playing chicken here. The UK can choose to not enforce a border, east-west or north-south. Then it is for the EU to decide whether they want to force Ireland to enforce a border with the north. None of this resolves the original border problem and it appears to defeat the objective of Brexit, but we'd be much further along as a sovereign nation than if we capitulated to remainers. Also none of this is guaranteed because parliament is a nest of snakes and weasels.
Boris doesn't give a **** if the troubles start up again - he's got paymasters to appease !
Even if that were correct, so what? Where and what is your syllogism?
My we are a bitter and twisted little loser are we not?The only reason that the troubles might start again is because the IRA are deprived of their smuggling and bank robbing business, and they were rather hoping to make a few bob out of the people smuggling business.
Anyone that takes any notice of threats of tantrums is a fool.
@@vhawk1951kl England only knows Perfidious Albion. Poor Buggers!
Not a big deal to Johnson, he has told much bigger lies than this and reneged on so many other agreements. Of course it might look like more of a big deal to the EU and to other potential trade partners thinking of making a deal with the UK.
Haha really, lets just see what the EU do, the UK will not be in breach of any agreement but are in actual fact implementing articles 13 and 16 of the protocol. The whole world knows the EU never stick to a deal and can never be trusted.
Well let's consider this. When in the EU. German and the UK were the only ones to enforce 100% of the rules. The further South and East you go the lower the amount the rules are informed. We aint in the EU now. I doubt the EU will risk WTO rules. I would put money on them selling the Irish out. Remember they have issues with not attacting rather a lot of American companies that are based in the Republic. Just a theory
In what particular is that not just some infantile tantrum?
Identify but one deliberate untruth uttered by Mr, Johnson.
@@vhawk1951kl1 There were no parties.
2 If there were gatherings they did not breach covid regulations.
3 If there were parties and they breached regulations I did not notice them.
4 If there were parties in breach of regulations and I was in attendance I believed they were work meetings.
And that is just on one issue !
Many people think that BloJo is a sleeper agent for Putin, or one of Putin's 'Useful Idiots' at least.
I am beginning to wonder whether he is ALSO a sleeper agent for Sinn Féin(SF), because he is single-handedly advancing Irish unification by decades. His actions have put Irish unification on Turbo.....
Thanks, BloJO!
Imagine he's turning the Irish Farmers Association in NI into Nationalists 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Unbelievable stuff altogether 😂
Ingenious even 😜
What's ur problem with that
@@RazorMouth
The Ulster Farmers Union has been quite vocal about how important the Northern Ireland Protocol(NIP) is to its members.
Of course, the DUP accused them of being "Brussels dupes"...
It is quite something when the DUP turns on one of the bedrocks of its support....
@@tonybardini4597
Did I give you the impression that it was a problem?
As far as I'm concerned, it isn't a problem at all....
@@gloin10 oops mixed up the IFA and UFU 😂
Perfidious Albion.
Bollox.
True
@@joemdee Fact
No, Albion which looks after its own interests. That's normal.
Yeeeeees Eternal Anglo.......Nice to hear from you, from behind the curtain........Keep plotting and scheming.......Your handy work this year, has been especially fruitful............Where will you strike next?.......Looks like its going to be Taiwan......
The real question here is.
What do Northern Ireland population want? What is best for them?
If Boris stays in power until next elections, i feel like we will only succeed in one thing.
Drive Scottish and Northern Irelanders further away from the (des)United Kingdom
Stay in Portugal. Why are you trying to interfere un UK politics?
@@charleswhite758 i live in this country for 10 years already.
I built a life here.
This government decisions affect me just as much as it affects you, my British wife and daughter.
Going out there changing things without listening to people in Northern Ireland will only drive them further apart from the Union, that on itself will have consequences.
But hey…what do i know…im just an immigrant paying taxes for over 10 years
@@ruigouveia7494 I was born here, and my family has been here for centuries. You understand nothing about the history of Ireland. It never was a united island, and it has been a possession of England since Norman times, that's the best part of 1,000 years. The south gained independence very recently. Northern Ireland is a part of the UK, just as Portugal has various islands in the Atlantic. Just because you pay taxes does not mean you can dictate to your host country. Please show some humility and respect.
@@ruigouveia7494 Don't worry about people like Charles White, I bet he doesn't know of the Anglo-Portuguese Treaty of 1373 and Treaty of Windsor (1386); if Charles White knew about those treaties I bet he would tear them up just to save his view that BREXIT was a good thing and to save Johnson.
@@charleswhite758 being born here has nothing to do with knowledge of history.
Ask any youngsters these days if they know anything about Ireland history…
And you are right. I don’t know much of Ireland history.
But are you telling me that all the work done since Good Friday Agreement won’t be destroyed by all this?
I thought people would welcome foreign nationals that made UK their home to gain interest into politics and decisions made in the country.
But i guess im wrong, people like you just enjoy segregation.
All you needed to do was to be polite and teach me a bit about the history (which i would very much appreciate since i love history). Instead you preferred to be a condescending nationalist👏
As for taxes, i consider being a person contributing to society (paying taxes, working hard, voting, be respectful of the law) a more valuable national than just a Gods giving birth right of being born in the country and living of the nanny state. (and that applies for any foreign person that chooses to live in the country i was born)
When the opportunity is given, i go to the pools and cast my vote. You can’t say the same for around 65% (local elections, since im not allowed to participate in any other elections)
Why did they negotiate and sign it then, if it is so bad?
You can't just rip up a deal BoJo, that's by its very definition illegal. You and your clown party are not above the law, you must play by the same rules as everyone else!
2 simple rules for life;
No.1 - Never trust a tory
No.2 - Never forget rule number 1
Tory or not you shouldn't trust any politician until they've earned the trust and respect of the people.
@@bathwater3196 So... Never?
Why trust a shabby looking guy who doesn’t even know how many kids he has???
The protocol is negotiated , agreed and signed by the UK government .
They just haven't implemented it yet though which is already in contravention of what the UK is REQUIRED to do.
And article 16 wasn't? I'm sick of listening to your salty moaning about international law when you dont mention that all you are doing is blindly supporting the EU, who are constantly in breach of "international law!" We never hear you then!
@@adrianbarton4917 I suggest you READ article 16. It doesn't do what you say it does.
And now we want to change it, it's not working for us.
@@adrianbarton4917
What are you talking about?
Article 16 was also agreed and ratified because it is part of the NIP.
And it does not allow unilateral action. It is there to protect the protocol.
Did you ever read article 16 or you just parroting headlines from the Daily Mail?
When the UK thinks that the EU breaches international law, it can do something against.
But why does nothing happen?
Because the EU does not breach international law.
I would put a bet that you don't even know what "international law" is.
You are more the "Brexit means Brexit" type, aren't you?
Well said, Simon Coveney. Furthermore, after Johnson's government stood an election on the basis of his "deal", they should stand on another if they now wish to change it.
Clauses
@Frank Swimbladder I'd agree with you on that so long as you're referring to tory voters.
Labour dunces
@@JR-pf7kk Tory voters wanted this?
brexit supporters wanted this?
Who's stupid really?
@Frank Swimbladder Sure Frank, the party that has always improved the lives of the people of the country when they were in power are the problem.
Thank Boris and Klaus Schwab
What do you expect from the crime minister.
The only is that feeble, it is infantile.
If that is your best and only shot no wonder you are a mouse (nothing and nobody)
I thought Brexit was DONE.
It won't be done until we walk away with no deal.
@@colinporter7108 How would that solve this particular issue?
Yes but apparently David Davis, Ian Duncan Smith and David Frost have now discovered it was a remainer's Brexit not a real one.
Lol
@@jananders1351 "Remainers Brexit", such a stupid phrase, and anyone with half a working brain would immediately call bs on someone who uses and means it. Remainers are the people who didnt want a brexit to begin with, now that brexiteers brexit is happening, they are all of a sudden not willing to take responsibility for what they have done to themselves, their children and their nation.
Boris knew the deal was bad and there were major problems with it, but the Burke still signed it.
Probably because he understood perfectly well that he could change the agreement or terms of the agreement at any time, and since he has a majority in the House of Commons, that is exactly what he can do
@@vhawk1951kl So Boris is not to be trusted then? Oh actually I already knew that..
@@LearnElectronicsRepair *No* man(human being) is to be trusted - nothing special about Boris.
If you ever *Trust* Any* man, that could only possibly be a triumph of hope over experience, and would require a species of wilful blindness.
Take my advice: Never entertain questions beginning with "So" for they can only possible come from the witless and lacking in learning..
Have you stopped beating you wife yet?
The EU needs to come down hard on Boris.
What they gonna do?
F.a.
" big vik"- orban flips 'em the bird and puts up hard borders and razorwire.
~all whilest receiving EU coin.
Eu cant do jacques shitte..
@@jonathansimmons5353 nothing like a good lil trade war to totally ruin what's left of the UK economy
And how would some impotent little committee of bureaucratic little burghers do that? They can rarely agree on whether or not go to the lavatory let alone anything else.
I think recent events in and about Russia have demonstrated beyond any doubt the impotence of that little committee of bureaucratic burghers.
@@vhawk1951kl you really have a problem mistaking the EU for the UK...
@@lenawagenfuehr53 Let me let you in on a secret:
I *Don't* care ,now re-arrange the following words into a well-known phrase or saying
im a staunch loyalist and unionist but for gods sake its time for a border poll let the people decide once and for all
This is a problem caused entirely by the DUP. It's a unionist problem, it's up to you to fix it. Don't expect the Fenians to help you out.
You will just have to save your breath to cool your porridge until May 2024, but in the meantime, feel free to splutter impotently.
Under Criminal law, the concept of "Necessity" is a defense that permits a person to act in a criminal manner when an emergency situation, not of the person's own creation compels the person to act in a criminal manner to avoid greater harm from occurring.
The reality is that this necessity (if it is to be believed), is directly the creation of Boris. Secondly, it misses out on the net benefit of the protocol to NI which means that there is no greater harm. This bill in fact inflicts greater harm.
Legally, while necessity is a term that is allowable it does not apply because of those 2 reasons. It is used here as a cover. Should it have applied then it would only apply to the minimum needed to alleviate the situation and that does not include removing the ECJ role overseeing EU law and rules.
Those are 3 gaping holes in the legal logic.
We all know that this is an action for domestic politics. More specifically internal Tory party politics.
The general proposition can be best summarised as follows: "necessity knows no law but makes law."
There is nothing to prevent the United Kingdom government or the House of Commons from derogating from a treaty, because the House of Commons is sovereign which means subject to no other or higher authority, or in plain language, Parliament me do as it pleases, Moreover it is a Cardinal principle of the sovereignty of Parliament that one Parliament cannot bind another, or rather a preceding Parliament cannot bind a subsequent Parliament
@@vhawk1951kl If you are stepping away from a Treaty, then you step away. However, this is a demand to change the UK's obligation and still demand from the EU to stand to it's own obligation.
There is International Law, you can decide to follow it, ignore it or break it. However, international law does exist. It is at it's basic level a set of norms between nations, but it is more than that as it is the fundamental base for all international organizations from NATO to WHO to UN. The enforcement of international law is done by the other participants. Their controls may be sanctions, financial punishments and/or even war.
You don't see the breakdown of power sharing the basis of peace in NI as a necessity?
@@throwawaysupreme9400 The breakdown of power sharing has happened many times in the past, even of the last few years. So it is not an urgent issue. This is one group subverting the will of the electorate.
@@stephenconway2468 Which electorate UK or NI? The alliance party was the real shift in the NI assembly and their focus is on bringing both communities together.
So back out of the Oven, change the recipe & civil unrest ensues?
Lots of vague threats of violence here. They will be dealt with harshly.
I guess EU will have to ban all UK goods that have not been formally checked if UK is not doing it. This also means a hard border with 100% checks at the border between Ireland and NI if UK does not do it. -> unilateral safe guard measures ...
At that point, I encourage ROI to give a passport to the NI inhabitants that want it, including a relocation package inside EU. When UK and NI are going to lose inhabitants and business that are paying taxes and participate to the GDP, the politicians are going to reconsider their position.
Haha, what did you expect EU, it's Boris "the lie"Johnson your dealing with...
Remember he was "journalist" in Brussels. Party time 🥳
If that is your best and only shot, no wonder you are a mouse (nothing and nobody)
Rather than invoking Article 16, Boris has chosen to kick the ball down the road for the foreseeable
Oven ready.
The House of Lords cannot allow this to happen.
The House of Lords is an appointed and un-democratic chamber. The Commons is an elected chamber, and its decisions cannot be blocked. The remoaner Lords can delay, but they must give way to the elected chamber. Sorry you don't like democracy, maybe you would be happier under a Spanish-style junta.
There is absolutely nothing that the House of Lords which is a mere cipher after the Parliament act can do about it
calling it now, even if somehow EU agree to this, when dispute arises and it will arises, the third arbitration will find it in EU's favour, and UK will again cry foul and calling it unfair and wanting to change the rule again.
We are a sovereign nation now, we don't do arbitration. If it's not working for us, it gets changed. End of.
@@charleswhite758 We've always been a sovereign nation. For fuck's sake do some Googling instead of embarrassing yourself by parroting Farage's tripe everywhere!
@@charleswhite758 thats so clever, im a sovereign person Im just gonna changed the mortgage I agreed with my bank, now my bank has to pay me 800 quid per month instead, so easy.
@@johntitor414 Unfortunately for you, no you are not a sovereign person, there's no such thing.
Sovereign nations are permitted to withdraw from treaties (who's going to stop them?), but there will of course be consequences in deteriorated foreign relations. Can foreign relations between the UK and EU get any worse?
We will simply have to re-build our relationship from the ground up, step by step. It's a new world. Many of us called that process "no-deal Brexit", we could see that it was the only way forward, the old relationship of overlord and supplicant had to be totally destroyed and a brand new one created. That's going to take time (shame we didn't do it to start with), and it might be painful.
We have the next 10,000 years of history to look forward to, so a couple of years re-building the relationship is immaterial in the long-term. Let's get it right.
The EU is furious that we had the gall to leave their totalitarian project which was supposed to be the culmination of European history. We escaped and are now free again.
@@charleswhite758 very idealist, however whats gonna happen is Ireland will simply be reunited within 5 years which in turn acutally solve the issue.
Counting down to the EU reimplementing all the paperwork & customs procedures that they had put on hold in 2021. 🙃
Greetings from Northern Ireland btw. 🙂
Any views from ground zero ?
The EU can "reimplement" what it likes. It Doesn't mean the UK will comply.
@@justonecornetto80 It will have to. The EU has no patience for Britain left, and why would it? There's endless posturing and Little England grandstanding coming from Westminster, and has been for years, followed by ignoring agreements etc.
At this stage, Britain is like a shopkeeper who's gone to the bank to negotiate a new overdraft facility, but has spent the past 20 minutes standing outside the bank manager's open office door, loudly shouting at other customers coming and going about what a moron the manager is and his wife is a fat simpleton and the bank needs him ore than he needs them and this will be the easiest overdraft to arrange in history.
The EU has no reason to humour Britain any longer, and isn't that fussed about supporting Ireland any more, so it'll snap the ledgers shut and give Britain all the paperwork and punitive legislation it's been jockeying to get. Britain will find EU trade dramatically harder, while other trading partners will be watching Britain to see how it honours its agreements, or not - and if not, as a dishonourable partner, who will want to make deals with her, or at what cost?
@@justonecornetto80 there is really something wrong in the UK that so many people believing Boris Johnson when he is talking rubbish to the Media. Yes, the UK can stop the protocol but must live with the response of the EU. Trade interruptions are not good for the already very fragile UK economy because printing money alone doesn't mean that the country is doing well and they must print a lot when l see the mismanagement of the Tories.
Not to worry, the EU will impose import tariffs on UK goods; that should pay for all the new paperwork and cover any costs RoI incurs. And focusing those tariffs on marginal constituencies should focus the minds of many soon to be former Tory voters.
Boris Johnson is no stranger to breaking the law so why would you expect his Tory government to be any different?
Boris is a serial law and rule breaker.
As an Irish citizen i agree he ruined it.
If anyone in the US tried to just flat out not go to Congress to get their way there would be huge consequences. Why is it ok for the representatives of the Northern Irish people to just not represent the Northern Irish people and still take their salaries like they're working still? Furthermore if the Protocol didn't work, why'd BoJo and co. suggest it in the first place? The Tories and the DUP just want to stay in power in Northern Ireland and they don't care if they have to drag down the Irish in the process
And there he is Donaldson who doesn’t represent the Irish people, he represents the Tory party only.
@@ChristianPatriarchy 🤑
Irish people? I'm Irish and wondering why he'd represent us. We have our own Taoiseach (prime minister)
@@Maidaseu oh you mean the Taoiseach no one actually got to vote for yea makes sense
Keep the protocol, bRExiT never and doesn't work
No.
We're putting an end to EU interference in the UKIM.
True, it’s not the protocol that’s not working it’s Brexit
Trying hard for TPP interference instead. 🤪
@@Lucid.dreamer is that a joke? Brexit is responsible for so much that has harmed the UK, those who voted 'patriotically' for Brexit have wrecked this country and are responsible for this criminal Government in charge of the country.
@@lindarose7475
I'm all *broke up.*
Cry me a *salt mine.*
The UK has LEFT the EU.
The UK is not going to rejoin the EU.
So forget it.
The UK is joining the CPTPP. By the end of 2022 /early 2023 the UK will be a member of the CPTPP.
You can kiss goodbye to your silly dreams of EU / SM / CU participation. It ain't gonna happen.
So forget it.
And the more you weep and whine, the more I enjoy it.
2022 and humans are still squabbling over imaginary lines, coloured rectangles and symbols.
THIS! I cannot understand where 'nationalistic pride' ofer self imposed imaginary barriers comes from. It's primeval.
Give us our 6 counties back 🙏🏻🙏🏻
Only if there's a democratically agreed referendum, and if people understand the economic cost.
United Ireland
@@greathey1234 under British rule ✊🏻🇬🇧
United ireland is the only way out of this mess, Donaldson is brickin it in case he loses an inch of his unionism, He can’t hide his badness ,plus losing the election was a real slap in the mouth
@@constantinvaldor3742 yeah that worked out great first time🙄
There are two options for a customs border for Northern Ireland: the Irish Sea, or something which violates the Good Friday Agreement. The US is guarantor of that agreement. Boris is pushing for the UK to have US economic sanctions placed against them.
what to expect from the madman who caused UK to leave the largest single market, shrinking UK economy overnight leaving it second worst in terms of GDP growth only to russia, effectively choosing to sanction itself
Wrong on both notions. The UK operated with a border with the EU for quite awhile when it was not a member of the EEA. The US has NO say on the Good Friday agreement, its an agreement with London and Ireland and the NI assembly on power sharing inside the NI border.
Gosh, Creepy, sleepy Joe! Man the lifeboats!!!
S_d the Good Friday Agreement. If they want to start bombing us again, we'll deal with them harshly.
@@darrellpowell6042 wrong moron
every time you see Boris smiling it means he's going to cause more damage
Doesn't it just make you so angry you want to rip off his latest hi-viz jacket and stuff it into his smirking mouth !
Pescara:"The Lord Ferdinand laughs". Delio: "Like a deadly cannon that lightens ere it smokes". Webster. Duchess of Malfi. Act 3 Sc.3
Whether Boris or not in power the solution must be same full brexit. As usual covney.. Ireland. EU.. USA.. All party's have dictated to Northern Ireland who should have been a voice at all meetings.. No compromise needed EU put up technology.. But UK must put ni British first
EU COVNEY HAS NEVER WORKED TO WORK THINGS OUT.
Damage to who? We're looking after our own interests. If you as a third party/country don't like it, tough.
The USA is calling the shots in the UK. open your eyes lol
Simon becomes a better speaker the more annoyed he gets. Less punctuations with ummm etc. Glad he is our Foreign Affairs Minister to try and keep them in line.
He knows exactly what those Tories are up to, he spent a long time living amongst them in England.
He's full of sh!t.
He's a good runner as well as we saw some weeks ago,the more annoyed he gets must work in lots of ways
He's a prime whinger.
@@wesleyhenning5946 What happened a few weeks ago that he is a good runner?
Everyone in Europe looking at Britain....... Understanding exactly how the troubles came about 🙄
*Perfidious Albion*
German-led interference?
@@TG-ts3xn Don't be a simpleton all your life.
@@RazorMouth there you go again. Abusing people. Does it do something for yourself esteem? Would you like to talk about it?
Must be eating your razors
Not everyone, just Irish republicans and some spiteful EU bureaucrats who are risking NI peace to punish the UK for leaving their club. Most of the rest of Europe doesn’t really give a toss about Irish petty point scoring or the Irish in general. Don’t kid yourself.
The Irish People have been left with No other choice now, but to plan forward for the Reunification of the Island, under the Terms of the Good Friday Agreement.
It it Now Time to focus on this happening, for as long as Westminster has a foot in Ireland, there will Never be True Peace.
And the IFA in the north will most likely advise its members to push for reunification...... Wouldn't that be a sight to behold.
Many of those moderate rural unionists are only really loyal...... To the Pound and Euro.
Won't ever happen. Reunification? What you really mean is EU land grab.
UK to annex Eire!
That is true. The people of Ireland _will_ end up with a choice between reunification and dealing with a failing statelet on their island. I do hope they don't end up resenting the result when they have been put in this position without any fault of their own.
@@TG-ts3xn fat chance of that
no country should be subject to restriction on its own internal trade by another power.
I'm done with this BS,it's time for the EU to bite back.... Let's see what a trade war does for the cost of living crisis. If politicians don't pay the cost of their crimes and mismanagement they won't change.
Bite back...
Hmmm.
Big vik orban just flipped the bird at the EU without any action taken-hard border, pushbacks, razorwire army on border, and hungary is taking EU coin.
And Big vik just vetos EU stuff.
~ they cant do jacques shitte..
tee hee But the idea of a few impotent bureaucratic little burghers biting anything is frankly absurd
I always thought that the British had a sense for humour!
Nope only the English version.....
A black day to be British.
PS - for all Brexit idiots - International Law has already settled this situation; a domestic law of one party cannot set aside an International Treaty. That would take agreement from both Parties (Vienna Convention on Treaties).
@@petergaskin1811 I guess Boris Johnson was an enigma.
Sarcasm is the lowest point of wit and therefore so sorry for attacking English sense of humour!
@Christina Evans poor poor little girl, did somebody steal your dum-dum.... hire have this one from me...💩
Get the price of fuel reduced
Tax reduced
Let's gets prioritys sorted ffs .
This government needs to go ... end off.
Have you just come out of your cave, oil prices has risen since the war in Ukraine. This is a world wide problem.
Boris causing a trade war with our biggest trade partner during a cost of living crisis, also potentially reigniting the troubles, all so he can please the swivel eyed loons and save his bacon.
Is there a trade war?
Is there a trade war *Now *and who are the parties to the said war? So long as you dream about the future which is a dream you will always be an impotent little mouse (nothing and nobody). You are making a mountain out of a molehill
@@vhawk1951kl sorry let me refrain it because a trade war would imply we would retaliate, when in reality we can't 👍
It will be the EU and US imposing sanctions on us while your beloved Tories parade as kings of your mole hill.
@@joefortey4 Shrug, *Is* there a trade war?
yea, right.
Has not Russia just demonstrated how futile and impotent are sanctions?
@@vhawk1951kl you mean the economically destitute kleptocracy formaly known as Russia?
Aren't they currently sending 50 year old men armed with WW2 rifles to go die in Ukraine in large numbers?
That Russia?
This is a failed state.
If only that meant something, but it plainly does not
@@vhawk1951kl Don't strain yourself sleepy.
Michel Barnier reports in his book under the subheading „Monday 17. February 2020: A philosophical gap“, the very first day of negotiations for the „trade deal“:
„After an initial exchange of very British pleasantries, the first bombshell hits: as if it is no big deal, David Frost mentions that Boris Johnson‘s goverment do not feel themselves to be bound by the Political Declaration, which it signed on 17. October, barely four months ago. ‚We can accept some elements but not all. There is‘, he tells me, ‚a philosophical gap between us about the so-called level playing field‘ - as if it were a question of philosophy!“
(Michel Barnier, My Secret Brexit Diary, pg 316)
Can see the UK head for a ression big time
Treaty signed by this government to deliver policy of this government not in Queen's speech but rushed through
Boris' commitment to international treaties is as strong as his commitment to his marriage vows. Zero.
United Ireland, problem solved.
Nope it will take off burden off uk but Irish tax payers will have to bare the burden. Ireland can't even afford their own cost let alone northren ireland
If it wasn't for the bone headed DUP and TUV reunification would certainly ease many problems but there are other serious readjustments that would need to be made so now is not the best time.
@@cliffsofmoher4220 If Ireland has a vote on taking on the burden, and it says yes, will you consider the problem solved then?
@@PeterXiao1 I don't know then that will mean rise in income tax and cutting government spending
@@cliffsofmoher4220 obfuscating, so typical
It’s not a big deal?😂 what planet does this man live on?
it will be a big deal, when President Biden gets involved
Borisworld
It is not a big deal it is0.001 of EU trade, it is a pity the EU dullards have decided to inflict 20% of their total checks on that level of trade. The EU will lose in any court they have acted like silly petulant children because they see their silly little club disintegrate.
Because actually he does not care of scraping the GFA 😁 And henlike to be the rogue kid, party time... Dancing Queen 🥳
If only those who use those asinine and infantile little yellow symbols realised that in so doing they were declaring to all the world that they were imbecile children, they might not use them, but then imbecile children are not exactly notorious for recognising the obvious.
Go home UK, you’re drunk
"you can't just trash the Brexit deal".... Minsk agreement says hi.
What is wrong with Boris? Drama after drama each and every day
Boris is trying to save "Big Dog" by using "The dead cat strategy" also know as "deadcatting".
Ha! So England, Scotland and Wales out of the EU.. Northern Ireland, kind of, but not really.. Not quite 'getting brexit done' then
Done and dusted... But floor is still sticking to shoes. Too much parties ?🥳
Since the United Kingdom has seceding from the EU as a matter of fact and law, brexit or the adult term secession has been achieved or if you will "done"
The European Union cannot even manage their own rules let alone
Rabid EU bashing by dwindling numbers of people who still cling onto the notion that Brexit was anything other than a complete shambles will not work here. The UK is firmly in the wrong. The EU is happy to stick to the rules that Boris and his gang signed up to, and hailed as a 'good deal'
All 3 comments shadow banned?
If that doesnt wake people up
Shameful. Most people in N.I. want the EU changes and to keep the Protocol.
So what? - To what is that relevant
@@vhawk1951kl Ultimately the people in Ireland will decide. British imperial revanchism is the delusion of a aged and decrepit mindset, not 21st century realities.
It was clearly incoherent at the time it was just BOJO kicking the can down the road
More smoothly?
Johnson ripping up what he agreed to snd called a wonderful deal in October 2019, and achieved his 80 seat majority on.
So true, why deal with Boris or give him help. Not only can't you trust him he wont be here next year
Why might he not be Prime Minister in 2023? - He has until 2024 before he must face an election so you will just have to save your breath to cool your porridge until then
well he is well practiced in breaking laws
Not just him but all the tory governments in recent years
Identify but one
A lot of people talking about article 16, from what I have read that could be challenged by uk courts, if successfully challenged in a uk court there would be no domestic unilateral approach moving forward so it is not a route they would be willing to go down.
All that is necessary is a one line bill in Parliament stating that the relevant agreement is of no effect, and there is nothing that the courts can do about that because the courts have no power over Parliament which as the recent Supreme Court decision makes clear is sovereign, which is to say that Parliament can do as it pleases, including abrogating or amending treaties.
@@vhawk1951kl I'm not a barrister or anything but if the courts come to a judgement that this bill brakes international law I'm not sure what would happen, I guess its more the optics of it. The worrying thing about your comment is if its the case that essentially means parliament can act like an elected dictator.
@@coylezo Obviously you are no lawyer, but it is a cardinal principle of English law - recently underlined by the supreme court that parliament is sovereign which means that parliament*is* the law and the courts accept that and it follows as the night the day from that that if parliament wants to pas a bill into an act, the courts can do *nothing* about it, so called(and *in_fact* non-existent) international law, notwithstanding, for the childishly simple reason that the unequivocal sovereignty of parliament means that it is subject to*No*-repeat *No* authority whatsoever, as the supreme court made clear when the PM tried to suspend parliament. It is also trite law that one parliament cannot bind another.
There neither is nor can be any such thing as " international law because all law stems from sovereigns and the simply is no international sovereign or any body to which many countries will accept has having authority over them, least of all the USA Russia China, ukland or any other sovereign nation.
The key thing for you to grasp is that sovereign means subject to *no* repeat*no* authority and what nation that had not been defeated would willingly submit to the *any*other authority, mostly because those foolish enough to go in for democracy regard the electorate as sovereign, and what electorate that was not composed of docile weaklings would willingly surrender that unless it had been defeated in war?
So *No* international law for want of any international sovereign and sovereigns are only sovereign because the have the power to *impose* their authority which in so-called 'real life' comes out of the barrel of a gun and what do you imagine could effectively threaten or impose its will on all of the countries of the world including the usual suspects?
To ask that question is to answer it, is it not?
If you tried going to the high court or above seeking to enjoin(get an injunction against or seek to restrain) parliament, your application would be immediately struck out by the court of its own motion and any judge failing to do that would immediately find himself at the business end of a weapon wielded by one of HM soldiery and all the judges I know and I know many, really would not fancy that one bit it, or in plain language they know which side their bread is buttered. Parliament also likes to call itself the high court of parliament (which puts it above *all* courts without exception) so parliament really *is* a 16' tall gorilla with a submachine gun-it sits anywhere it jolly pleases(if you know that joke question)
Can the courts enjoin or otherwise control parliament? There is not a judge in the land that would not tell you in short and no uncertain terms, the answer to that.
Clear now? There is simply*No* doubt whatsoever about that.
Would*You argue with a 26'tall gorilla with a submachine gun?
So there is your answer. A rather decent and jolly chap by the names of Charles- the first of that name once tried to dissolve parliament at the point of several guns and you may have some idea what happened to him. He committed the war crime of *all* war crimes; he *lost* a war.
You take my point? Sure there are tribunals established by treaty such as the wWTO,but the generally have all the teeth of a dead sheep, and appeals to what is called " the rule of law" tend to fall on deaf ears of rulers scared witless of the ruled. You saw how members of congress very nearly wet themselves when a few irate Americans got a bit excited, and a certain George III tried bleating about the rule of law to Americans and you probably know how far that got him.
Not once, not twice but *Three* times what is fancifully called "the people" of ukland voted for secession from the EU, do you really suppose that they have all magically changed their minds? - and Boris is their man, so he has a fairly large gun, to say nothing of a majority in the house of commons.
Our Boris also knows full well what all but the witless know and that is that most of those that voted for secession are not wildly fond of aliens and the more obviously they are alien , the less fond they are of them, the religion modernism and its cognates or synonyms of sin notwithstanding.
Vile though the lower classes may be they do all of the work and they are not timid, so it is best not to cross them.
If in any doubt, suck up to them like mad and forget all that religious morality/ethics bunk.
@@vhawk1951kl ah ok so it is a "democratic" dictatorship in the end then. Truly we live in a world were elected officials can say screw you to (if you would rather i put it) international conventions without the people's approval, screw you to the future trust of the nation and screw you to the people who lent us the power, we just pander to you anyway, no matter the moral and ethical implementations. And we think we have come so far yet this is were we are.
Why dosn't goods from GB go directly to a port in the Republic of Southern Ireland.
Disgraceful.... A treaty is a treaty.... You shake hands with Johnson and count your fingers after.
All treaties get amended, name me one which hasn't. Treaty of Rome? Endless changes.
You do realise that the EU has broken International Law, so why should the UK not when its in the best interest of the Union.
@@crumpetsbuttered The EU has not broken international law. The Union does not matter. Scotland will soon be free.
@@charleswhite758 Treaties are only amended by agreement between the parties.
@@steverichmond7142 Treaties are for wimps. We are a sovereign nation. Grow a pair.
Yes, ideally treaties are amended by mutual agreement, but if clearly intolerable for one party and the other is too pig-headed and vituperative (see below) to even discuss any amendment, there is no choice but to scrap it.
"The EU will not renegotiate the Northern Ireland protocol agreement, the European Commission vice-president, Maroš Šefčovič, has said" th-cam.com/video/-UqA_Pyvr-M/w-d-xo.html
A United Ireland would be much simpler
UK to annex the South then?
Tá sé ag teacht.
I agree but some of the Ulstermen would rather die first
Interesting figures from the ONS which shows exports to the EU have risen for 3 months on the bounce. And the figures for April 2022 are the highest on record.
The EU lecturing on treaty breaking?? You couldn't make it