Get the Brass 6500K AMUTORCH E4 here: www.amutorch.com/products/amutorch-e4-4000-lumen-max-output-precious-metal-brass-body
Get the AMUTORCH ES3 here: www.amutorch.com/products/amutorch-e3s-3000-lumensexquisite-edc-flashlight-with-high-output Get the ES3 on Amazon: www.amazon.com/dp/B08LDCM2SF
I think there is some sort of typo, i dont see how an 18650 fits in this short tube , i think it is 18350? if it does take 18650 ill buy one now. extension tube?
Nice little light! I hope that's a typo @3:40 Dropping from 2420 lumens down to 380 ANSI with the 20350 battery?! Seems rather drastic! I really liked the Manker E14 lll in this review. Wonderful beam pattern!
ANSI lumens is not the same as out the front lumens. He measured 2420 OTF lumens at 380 ANSI. Most floody lights have low ANSI Ratings because it is kinda like a measure of surface brightness. ANSI was made to measure how bright a projector can make an image. Look at the videos he did with more throwy lights. They have an ANSI closer to the OTF measurement. Generally the more throwy a light, Candela per Lumen, the closer the two measurements will be.
@@nna00100 Thanks, but I know what ANSI is. The discrepancy comes from the difference between the two batteries used. There's a huge difference between the two.
@@FLASHAHOLIC_TV I'm finding it hard to believe that the 20350 battery would drop to 380 lumens while the 18350 battery drops to 1670 lumens. I could see maybe 1380 lumens for the 20350, but 380!? Both batteries were fairly equal and capable of 2400+ lumens at turn on. Is the 20350 battery that crappy that the voltage and current drop is that bad? Even a 1 second difference in timing shouldn't be quite this bad. Sorry, but it just looked like a typo to me.
It's because of the higher CRI, not the lower color temperature, lower color temperatures like 4000K barely make any difference to output, and 5000K is just as efficient as 6500K.
@@swecreations Excellent point. At first I was a little disappointed with the colour temperature. But now that I've grown accustomed to it, I'm really liking the non-washed out colours and warmer light levels. Everytime now I see a 6500K, I'm like "Wow that's annoying" definately easier on the eyes with a slightly lower colour temperature.
@@chrissinclair8705 Yep, I personally always pick 3500-4500K with 70-80 CRI if given the choice, as you lose very little in terms of output but it still looks a lot better than 6500K. And it's much nicer on the eyes because of them containing much less blue light.
@@FLASHAHOLIC_TV Make more sense! And the comparison shot between other 3 actually doesn't look bad at all. "2400" lumen was actually as bright or probably brighter than Manker E14 III. btw, did AMUTORCH offered a code for any of their products? interested in getting that tiny E3S
Get the Brass 6500K AMUTORCH E4 here: www.amutorch.com/products/amutorch-e4-4000-lumen-max-output-precious-metal-brass-body
Get the AMUTORCH ES3 here: www.amutorch.com/products/amutorch-e3s-3000-lumensexquisite-edc-flashlight-with-high-output
Get the ES3 on Amazon: www.amazon.com/dp/B08LDCM2SF
Ty.. Ordered
Your music choice is also so good.
I prefere high CRI torches, they aren't the britest ones, but in a autumn forest it'll give you a lot of fun.
Samsung LH351D 5000K 90CRI
Just bought a fw3a but now I want this one! Thanks for the review and costing me more money lol
Get the AMUTORCH ES3 too!!!
Just saw this one, can't understand how I missed your review👍. It's a pity Banggood parted ways with Amutorch, I am growing fond of their lights.
The "My GOD!" was hilarious!! 🙂
Nice review as always Flashaholic !
Surprised you’ve not ran into Ronnie Pickering yet 🤣
I have!! In the old dangerous place
@@FLASHAHOLIC_TV Glad you lived to tell the tale mate ! 😂
Which do you prefer this or the e3s?
Where can I get clip like that ?
Etsy or ebay for GD Skulls
not bad nice colours but E3S for me 100% good video
I think there is some sort of typo, i dont see how an 18650 fits in this short tube , i think it is 18350? if it does take 18650 ill buy one now. extension tube?
Its a bloody typo 😔
@@FLASHAHOLIC_TV No worries mate.
Nice little light! I hope that's a typo @3:40 Dropping from 2420 lumens down to 380 ANSI with the 20350 battery?! Seems rather drastic!
I really liked the Manker E14 lll in this review. Wonderful beam pattern!
ANSI lumens is not the same as out the front lumens. He measured 2420 OTF lumens at 380 ANSI. Most floody lights have low ANSI Ratings because it is kinda like a measure of surface brightness. ANSI was made to measure how bright a projector can make an image. Look at the videos he did with more throwy lights. They have an ANSI closer to the OTF measurement. Generally the more throwy a light, Candela per Lumen, the closer the two measurements will be.
@@nna00100 Thanks, but I know what ANSI is. The discrepancy comes from the difference between the two batteries used. There's a huge difference between the two.
@@craigs7181 No problem Your comment before doesn't reflect that but it doesn't matter. Stay safe my friend.
Basically one stepped down at 29 seconds the other at 30 seconds. It varied, outside both batteries might do 32 seconds
@@FLASHAHOLIC_TV I'm finding it hard to believe that the 20350 battery would drop to 380 lumens while the 18350 battery drops to 1670 lumens. I could see maybe 1380 lumens for the 20350, but 380!? Both batteries were fairly equal and capable of 2400+ lumens at turn on. Is the 20350 battery that crappy that the voltage and current drop is that bad? Even a 1 second difference in timing shouldn't be quite this bad. Sorry, but it just looked like a typo to me.
This E4 does not have the ramping modes?
Nope
@@FLASHAHOLIC_TV ok thanks 😊
👍🏻 How many flashlights do you have?
SHLOADS
@@FLASHAHOLIC_TV im sorry i don't get it. What you mean shloads? 🤔
@@BrightOnFlashlight lmao.. S**tloads
@@FLASHAHOLIC_TV HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Dude his YT name is a dead giveaway 😅
I bet you the lower lumen output is because of the lowish (4000K) colour a 6500K would probably hit the specs and is more effecient.
It's because of the higher CRI, not the lower color temperature, lower color temperatures like 4000K barely make any difference to output, and 5000K is just as efficient as 6500K.
@@swecreations Excellent point. At first I was a little disappointed with the colour temperature. But now that I've grown accustomed to it, I'm really liking the non-washed out colours and warmer light levels. Everytime now I see a 6500K, I'm like "Wow that's annoying" definately easier on the eyes with a slightly lower colour temperature.
@@chrissinclair8705 Yep, I personally always pick 3500-4500K with 70-80 CRI if given the choice, as you lose very little in terms of output but it still looks a lot better than 6500K. And it's much nicer on the eyes because of them containing much less blue light.
Nice rosy tint, too bad no ml/ff mode..
I’m afraid to buy another flashlight for fear of regret when a 10,000 lumen flashlight the size of a penny comes out next week.
Guess E3S is a better buy... Cheaper, smaller and actually hits the claimed lumen.
This is the high cri version, the 6500K version will hit 4000
@@FLASHAHOLIC_TV Make more sense! And the comparison shot between other 3 actually doesn't look bad at all. "2400" lumen was actually as bright or probably brighter than Manker E14 III.
btw, did AMUTORCH offered a code for any of their products? interested in getting that tiny E3S
@@yuhsin2006 not yet, I will ask them.
Someone is popular! I'm still waiting for mine :(
I gave up on it when it said 4000 lumens measured at 2400ish. I can understand a little variance but that’s a bit drastic.
They only give the rating for the 6500K version, this is the high cri version
@@FLASHAHOLIC_TV oh I see, my apologies.
I think the Amutorch E3S was way brighter than this haha
Should made titanium model.
20-30 second step down blows
Joys of high CRI. Different LED options will hold turbo longer.
Great . another flashlight that doesn't even come close to the advertising.
They offer 2 LED's the 6500K will hit 4000
So nowhere near 4,000 lumens