Justice Madan Lokur, Ex-SC Judge Interview On Collegium System,Judges Appointment, Govt Interference
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ม.ค. 2023
- Interview of former Supreme Court judge Justice Madan B Lokur with Manu Sebastian, Managing Editor of LiveLaw, on collegium system.
#supremecourtofindia #collegiumsystem
LiveLaw brings you the latest legal news and updates from India and beyond.
We are into fact based legal journalism.
Endeavour of LiveLaw is to play an active role for a transparent and democratic legal ecosystem, in the larger public interest.
This video is an intellectual property belonging to LiveLaw Media Pvt Ltd. Any unauthorised usage of this video/script in any format is prohibited and will be subject to prosecution.
Stay updated. Subscribe to our channel bit.ly/2pskgB3
Support Us: bit.ly/35qFj6A
Visit Our Website: www.livelaw.in/
hindi.livelaw.in
Facebook: / livelawindia
/ livelawhindi
Twitter: / livelawindia
/ livelawh
Instagram: / livelaw.in
/ livelawhindi
Linkedin: / livelaw
/ livelaw-hindi
Live Law app is India's fastest legal news app that will keep you updated on the latest law/legal news from India and across the world. Download now.
Android: bit.ly/2toaimp
iOS: apple.co/39dQ0vh
![[HIGHLIGHT] หมีLIVEปะ? | EP.171 เห็นแต่ในจอ วันนี้มาต้องขอคารวะ](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gPWLxa0e_Z8/mqdefault.jpg)
Excellent & Extremely Informative Discussion by His Excellency Ex-Judge Madan Lokurji. .Thanks a Ton Sir. .👍
thanks for watching
I am not with the govt or the judiciary. But having faced legal issues, I know that justice system is broken. Something needs to be changed to make it work. People fight cases for years even for small matters. Even then there is no surety that actual law will be followed by the judiciary. If you go to any court, you will find people using money or connections to get the judgements in their favor. Many multinational companies do not want to invest in India because India scores low in judicial system. If the judiciary cannot see this then they are out of touch with the ground level reality. I really hope that the judiciary and the govt work together to improve our judicial system.
Same here
Manu - please interview CJi Deepak Mishra also.
Thanks for the suggestion
Sir, May you record this programme in hindi language for awareness of mass?
Thanks for that suggestion, will consider.
You highest judiciary people exposed yourself and you people lost your credibility in general public. You say constitution basic structure can't be altered then why you judges or justices have not corrected or no guts to reinstate the original words of Constitution which were altered by the amendments made by indira gandhi to the preamble of the constitution by adding secular and socialist words. Relating to judicial appointments the procedure prescribed by constitution is based on consultation with the honourable president of india not on absoulte recommendation by judges or collegium. It is you people in order to avoid confrontation & in fear with the then congress government abusing their power in appointing and transfer of judges at that time brought this collegium system. Yes you judges are biased with no credibility. It is clear from your judgements. You people avoid addressing suffering of kashmiri pandit till today on the other hand you people stand by the side of rohingya and every other illegal immigrants extending right to life principle to them and denying the same to kashmiri pandits. Like this there are so many examples. You people are absolutely double standard people & you have no right to talk. You people say there is absolute freedom of speech and expression on the other hand if any body common public criticizes you intitiate contempt proceedings on them and if any big lawyer or advocate does the same you ask him to pay fine of 1rs as fine and you'll leave them. You judges think ordinary people are fools but it is not the case instead you people are the one. By saying judicial activism you people poking your nose in every issues and entertain them to be presented before you even if it has no much importance for the nation or public at large and again you'll say there are lot of cases pending we need to tackle with this issues as soon as possible. There is illegal conversions going on, there is tresspass going on government lands on which you people give stay order and prevents eviction. Why because your favorable minority community mobs come after you and you'll be dealt in a particular way, private lands in the name of wakf and non sense which is visible to normal public but you people don't want to address these issues. Like this the list goes on.
The Janta Party (which has current BJP leaders) rolled back on most of IG's amendments but decided to leave the amendments to the preamble. The Constitution iherently (and through the basic structure pronouncements) protects secular principles with or without what's in the preamble
President of India should resolve this problem
If there is some one who has the power to approve, then it means that person shall have the power to reject also.
Ok. Let’s make this case for all. MP’s appoint next MP’s , IAS appoint another IAS, PM appoint another PM. EC appoint next EC. Make it a circus and then call it as independence is needed.
Is the Law minister Hon'ble ??
Yes. Unlike judges..😁
Every parliamentarian
The Supreme Court is an Independent Body and the Centre MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO INTERFERE
Constitution is supreme
President of India is the final authority. If he rejects it stands rejected. Supreme Court has to obey it. S.C judge is not the first citizen of the country. It is President. Presidents wish is the people's wish.
Why judiciary is so great, which don't look for any reforms?
When it is same law, why two courts deliver two opposite judgement for the same case?
A common man has to spend his lifetime in courts, why it so?
Live telecasted cases like Smt Indira Gandhi and Mumbai terrorist attacks took years for judgement. Why?
Does the judgement is based on law or is it based on their views?
Are you people mad? The current NDA government is not responsible for bringing NJAC Act. The UPA Government had set up the Second Administrative Reforms Commission in 2005. The second administrative reforms in its fourth report titled "Ethics in Governance" had recommended setting up of NJAC. The then UPA government comprising of both Kapil Sibal and Chidambaram as Cabinet Ministers had approved the recommendations for implementation. The NDA government has only implemented those recommendations in its very first year i.e. 2014. Why are blaming the current government?
who decides the objections are frivoulous?
Collegium.
How did this corrupt person become a judge?
I have no redpect to this lokur judge. His conduct in public and at the bench was unprofessional and biased. His public appearance with others like chalameswar was bad..This guy was appointed by the collegium? If so I rest my case..
And you judges wants your people in the High Courts and Supreme Court......एक लंबी लिस्ट है इन लोगों के पारिवारिक पृष्ठभूमि की।। ना कोई परीक्षा, ना साक्षात्कार, बस एक अच्छा जुगाड़ हो और कुछ सालों की practice🤣🤣.....
atleast judges are not not religious lunitics
@@praveenpayiran they are worse, family fanatics. We sold our judiciary to a bunch of upper caste families.
Paid Chicken commenting from their IT cell village 😂😂look who is talking.... Wash your face .. before you point at judges..
@@hiheloByby6902 बेटा जाओ पहले जानकारी इकट्ठा कर लो, फिर भौंको।
If a judge is appointed by a gov then the judge will be loyal to the gov cause he came into power cause of the gov. He will definitely pass laws & judgements in favour of the gov which was the case in emergency during Indira Gandhi's period.
But if the judiciary appoints the judges, the judges will be independent. The judge who appointed them will be gone in a year or two..but what about the government?
Its really funny for a judge to say that the constitution cant be changed ,, Then how the word secularism got into constitution when it was not there on original drafting of the constitution ... We poor people of India ( not rich as they have other ways to resolve their grievances ) want our judiciary to be efficient , proactive , corrupt free as judiciary is our last resort when all other pillars fail ,,, Indian judiciary got its first shock when four judges conducted press conference to air their grievances ,,, Judiciary got second shock when some of the judges were dragged into corruption allegations ... Judiciary still following their vacation timing , despite the fact that was a practice from a racial british system when they ruled India ... When our poor people have to work at least 18 hours and have to lay in huts ,,, judiciary is enjoying life following all jingoistic practices which should have been thrown out when British left us ,,, judges should first sit together and ponder how to reduce timing between appeal and final verdict ,,, even the system of collegium is getting questionable ramifications ,,,, address that instead of sitting on judgement what vice president or law minister mentioned as finally they are politicians and their business is to work for people
President of India is the final authority. If he rejects it stands rejected. Supreme Court has to obey it. S.C judge is not the first citizen of the country. It is President. Presidents wish is the people's wish.
What about the constitution....