ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.ย. 2024
- With Israel in the headlines, many Christians are teaching that God is done with Israel due to their wickedness and rebellion. Pastor Jesse illustrates how God still has plans for Israel, and how God is currently using this new thing, the Church. (ALSO: ROMANS 11)
HOW TO HAVE ETERNAL LIFE : • Can I Know I'll Go to ...
SUBSCRIBE / bibleline
LIKE / biblelinemin
COMMENT ask us a question!
SHARE with all your friends and family
Do you have a Bible question? Send your question to questions@biblelineministries.org!
Support Bibleline - www.calvaryoft...
Bibleline is a ministry of Calvary Community Church in Tampa, Florida and is hosted by Pastor Jesse Martinez.
LIKE THIS? CHECK THESE GUYS OUT:
/ northlandchurchstc
(Tom Cucuzza)
/ @ingrace
(Jim Scudder)
/ northsidechurchathens
(Freddie Coile)
/ biblelinebroadcast
(Yankee Arnold)
/ thekeesboerministrycha...
(Kees Boer)
#israel #church #replacement #bibleline #replaced #bodyofchrist #replacementtheology #jew #jewish #jews #nation #antisemitism #real #love #romans11 #romans #genesis #abraham #coventant #israelites #moses
![[Live] : ONE 168 วันนี้!! "โจนาธาน vs ซุปเปอร์เล็ก"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0jIN65KgJsI/mqdefault.jpg)
I'm so glad to hear this from view, Israel replacement theology is a false doctrine. Israel will be saved after the rapture. Thanks Pastor Jesse. God bless you.
Much needed video, as we see on social media an increase in replacement theology
If considering everything, corporate Israel has always been in rebellion against the Lord. Replacement Theology never takes that into account.
Great teaching. Thank you!
what about all the jews who now are christians, and all their offspring from the last 2000 years? "Replacement" theology? Its more like adoption theology where believers are adopted in to Israel.
I just recently discovered your channel, and it's been refreshing to say the least!
I'm beginning to notice that a lot of these obscure arguments directly oppose the character of the Lord. The idea that the Lord would turn away from Israel and break His covenant with them makes no sense. He is timeless, He knows the end from the beginning. He knew from the foundation of the world that Israel would be in a period of unbelief. To insert the idea that He would make a covenant with them knowing that He would break it makes Him a liar. No, Israel wasn't replaced by the Church. We are the branch that is to be grafted into the vine, Israel is that vine. I used to like Voddie Baucham, even if I took issue with his hyper-Calvanism. When I found out that he taught replacement theology I had to turn him off.
It's the same issue with the idea that we can lose our salvation. The Lord knew before the first motes of dust were created that we would continue to struggle in sin even after belief. For Him to save us temporarily and rescind our salvation goes against His character.
I agree with you, the only passage I battle with is Galatians 3 where it says the seed is Christ. Paul says seed.... Not seeds. It's a hard one
Why do you believe that’s a difficult one?
- Trent
@@BibleLine because all my friends say... You see the ultimate blessing of the Abrahamic Covenant was Christ, now God does not need national Israel anymore... All the promises are fulfilled in Christ. I can manage to defend Romans 9-11... But I don't know how to show God still has a purpose for Israel from Galatians 3
@markwhite5926
Don't you think that the Jews will one day come to faith in Christ? The bible says "They will look upon Him whom they pierced". I have always thought of this to be a future prophecy to yet be fulfilled, meaning that the Jews (and christians) will be hated by all the world and before they are completely destroyed, Christ will come back and then they will understand that He actually IS the ONE! Then He will save them inwardly and physically. Currently, the Jews despise Christ, but in that day they will come to believe. This is at least my understanding of the future we are heading towards.
@@markwhite5926 Gods done with natural Israel but that’s because they are not the true Israel which Paul explains and puts distinction between the natural one and the spiritual one. The natural Israel were never the true people of God but were called and used to show them, just like Moses had the natural tabernacle in the wilderness that was a shadow that represented the real one
@@marktravis5162 The Abrahamic Covenant is an eternal covenant! In it God promises the Land to national Israel... Therefore He can't be done with them
If I could make a recommendation I would recommend you do a video on these people that say they have near death experiences. Some people say they spoke with God and had great experiences but they clearly teach against the Bible. It's an anomaly to me that some people can have near death experiences with God or accurately predict the future and say God spoke with him while at the same time teaching heresies like lordship salvation.
We did make this video a long time ago
Can a person come back from Heaven?
th-cam.com/video/FBD3pSFFpCk/w-d-xo.html
- Trent
@@BibleLine
Here is what the scriptures says regarding these claims:
John 10:1 KJV - Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but CLIMBETH UP SOME OTHER WAY, the same is a thief and a robber.
Since no thieves and no robbers can enter heaven (according to the scriptures), than where these people go?
And what light did these people spoke with? The scriptures is clear here too.
2 Corinthians 11:14 KJV - And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
You want to inherit ALL THINGS?
Revelation 21:7
Please let me know.
@@BibleLine nice, thank you
God is against those who have hijacked Israel. They will suffer what they have been forcing others to suffer so that they can live the life of lavish without any suffering. This will not end well for them.
Gentiles are not The heirs of Christ We are The joint heirs of Christ! 🙏
Jeremiah 33.24-26: Have you not noticed that these people are saying, ‘The LORD has rejected the two kingdoms he chose’? So they despise my people and no longer regard them as a nation. This is what the LORD says: ‘If I have not made my covenant with day and night and established the laws of heaven and earth, hen I will reject the descendants of Jacob and David my servant and will not choose one of his sons to rule over the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. For I will restore their fortunes and have compassion on them.’”
Genesis 28:13- Jacob’s ladder was always considered to be Jesus Christ before incarnation.
Yes. For almost 2000 years now. Matt 23:37
It' is so weird when people think God is done with yisareal where is that in the bible ? No where they will he saved and i have faith it will be done and its so weird when i see people hate the jews like what why
I pray they get saved and Believe on the Lord Jesus christ alone for salvation once saved always saved
Good job pastor jessie love this video
I would love to learn hebrew to preach to them the true gospel i love everything about yiseral. i think the shabbat and all those traditions are cool
YAH bless you pastor jessie in jesus mighty name are Lord And God Amen
May the Most High YAH continue to shine His upon you always and give you peace, brother Nehemiah! 🙏❤️
Question-read carefully pls.
If by the end of the end 2/3 of Israel continues in rejection and does not receive the gospel and the Messiah and die, what happens to them?
(Let’s assume 1/3 say yes and get born again and become part of the New Creation. )
Again, what happens when 2/3 say No and keep saying No just like a Gentile does?
Not all of Israel is Israel [in faith].
Great truth discussed in accordance to God's word. No the Church has not replaced lsrael as some teach even among believers. The NlFB is one that teaches this false teaching about the Church replacing lsrael, Calvinist also teach this. The NIFB also teach a Prewrath rapture or resurrection and say noting about lsrael turn to Jesus after this resurrection and l didn't see where they teach Jesus's 2nd coming to earth to set up his kingdom a 1000 years at Jerusalem. Thanks again for sharing this and teaching on this!
Pastor Martinez,
First of all I just want to say I appreciate your ministry on the gospel message. You greatly defend faith alone and with so many lies regarding salvation on TH-cam, I appreciate that God is using your ministry to spread the truth of the gospel. With that said, I have a legitimate question regarding something you said in the beginning of this video:
1. Genesis 12:1-3 KJV
[1]Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee: [2] And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing: [3] And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.
You stated "I do not see in chapter 12 in verse 3 of Genesis has changed" which I agree with because the promises God gave to Abraham there are eternal promises.
With that said though, Galatians 3 explicitly states in verse 16 that to Abraham (the person) and to his seed (Christ) were the promises made. Verse 29 states "if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise" , and verse 9 states "they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham." Galatans 3 could not be any clearer that the promises God gave to Abraham and to his seed are (and have always been) meant for Abraham and to christians (whether they be jew or gentile).
How can you or anyone else come to any other conclusion in light of Galatians 3 and many other scriptures? If a christian calls themself a jew, that's actually spiritually accurate because Galatians 4:26 states "Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all."
Mother of us ALL meaning ALL the saved. If I'm a citizen of heavenly Jerusalem, then that makes me a spiritual jew, which is what the promises God gave to Abraham are made for. It's spiritual promises to those of faith:
Romans 4:13-14 KJV
[13] For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. [14] For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect:
Wow great points
Galatians 3 does not speak of the Abrahamic promise as a whole, but the promise of being blessed by the messiah. The Abrahamic promise has aspects which apply to everyone, and aspects specifically meant for Jews. The plural is used because the promise of blessing was repeated many times.
Even covenant theologians prior to the modern time didn’t use that verse in a contrary way to dispensatiobalism.
Also, your argument about heavenly Jerusalem is purely inference/deduction. God can build a city resembling earthly Jerusalem without us being Jews.
Read Galatians 3 again,
Galatians 3:16 KJV
"Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made."
Promises (plural). This is not just the promise of salvation as zionists like to purport. There is no misunderstanding when Galatians 3:8 is directly quoting Genesis 12:3.
And no it's not just my "inference" in regard to Galatians 4:26, because the rest of scripture supports what I'm saying and there's no misunderstanding clear scripture unless you are wilfully choosing to be ignorant of what's being taught. A Jew according to the Bible is the one circumcised in the heart (a.k.a the one who believes on Jesus Christ).
Romans 2:28-29 KJV
[28] For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: [29] But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.
Are physical jews the only ones capable of being circumcised of heart?
Matthew 3:9 KJV
And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
God couldnt care less about someone's physical descendance from Abraham. It's the spiritual children of Abraham that inheret the promises.
Matthew 8:11-12 KJV
[11] And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven. [12] But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Let me ask you this,
Physical jews who have died without believing on the Lord Jesus Christ up to this point, do they have future promises or inherentance coming to them?
Beautiful
I'd love to see you go over some videos of the popular NDE's where they talk about seeing Christians in hell like how you do. A lot of them sound convincing, but obviously you need to remain a bit skeptical of them.
Dear Calvinist: How there there be an elect that is the enemy of the gospel at the same time?
I'll take a stab. ALL present Christians were in rebellion to Him before He saved them.
Romans 11: 28. As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching election they are beloved for their fathers sake.
19:10 Christ is radical Truth. The Truth. God revealed in His Universe. Dividing line.
Can you fight against Christ, but be for God at the same time?
What side are those people on who actively oppose Christ?
whom do they side with?
A question,
what is a professing christian goes into apostasy, renouncing, rejecting all that he had previously believed from his heart, and died in that state. Will he still be saved on the basis of his initial confession of faith ?
He is still saved if he believed in Jesus Christ for the full payment of his sins.
- Trent
Pastor Martinez, have you watched John Rich and Tucker Carlson interview yet?🤔
Yes, he saw the clip from it. Interesting.
- Trent
@@BibleLineis this the clip about pre trip rapture?
Galatians 6:15-16:
Ethnicity is irrelevant & the new creature in Christ is the Israel of God.
Pergamos is the seat & dwelling place of Satan. During the tribulation, that is Jerusalem (Daniel 11:45 & Revelation 11:7-8). And Armageddon is at Pergamos (Revelation 2:16) too. Armageddon is in Israel, not Turkey. The Israeli nation state end times remnant is just 1 of the 7 churches, not separate from us. Which means nobody is leaving earth early because the body cannot be divided (1 Corinthians 12:12-25). The church is Israel.& Israel is the church. You can't be in Christ & out of Israel. Christ is the True Vine. In the Bible vine/vineyard = Israel. In Christ is the True Israel.(Vine).
Dispensationalism is doctrines of devils. They are the modern tribe of Dan & they have no inheritance in Revelation 7 because their doctrines violate the commands given in Revelation 22:18-19.
OT Dan's coasts went out too little for them so they rejected their physical allotment of land in Israel & instead physically conquered Laish. Laish = a plentiful, secure, quiet, lawless, careless, large land of immigrants.
NT Dan's coasts went out too little for them in relation to the law of God so they reject their spiritual allotment within Israel and have used their doctrines to spiritually conquer America. A large, plentiful (rich & increased with goods = Laodicea), careless (lukewarm = Laodicea), secure, quiet lawless land of immigrants.
Dan has no inheritance (salvation) in Revelation 7. Their doctrines, especially the pre trib rapture heresy add & take away from Scripture which violates the commands given in Revelation 22:18-19. The Danites of today do just as Peter warned about (2 Peter 3:15-16); they misunderstand Paul & twist the Scriptures to their own destruction. Repent & flee this wicked system before it is too late.
And you do remember the Church rejected Jesus just as badly...as Israel ever has. e.g. Laodicea. The church has the gospel and the Holy Spirit and the entire WORD preached through the world. Yet they have chosen more idols and sin than Israel ever have. Jesus addresses the churches in Revelation. He will address Israel of course. He will fulfill his Word concerning Israel. But you can't whitewash the gentile church.
Can you do a video on the unforgivable sin? I truly believe you have to physically and visually see Jesus commit miracles and then attribute those to Satan in order to commit it, but I want to know what your view on this is Jesse.
We did a two part series on this.
Unbelief and the Unpardonable Sin | Calvary of Tampa with Pastor Jesse Martinez |
th-cam.com/users/liveloiy13FR1us?feature=share
- Trent
Is the Church under the new Covenant?
God rejected all who reject him ultimately.
God is making a new creation that is comprised of BELIEVING Jew and BELIEVING Gentiles. If a Jew or Gentile does is rejection of this gospel that is offered then they go to hell whether they are Jew or Gentile. He is making a new creation and he only sees those who come in FAITH.(past, present, & future). Jesus is “the reboot” of the head of the new humanity, which is why Paul titles him the Last Adam and the second man (Adam means Man-kind) of a heavenly origin flesh - Resurrection body.
So God replaces the Old Creation in rejection for the NEW CREATION.
All Israel -IN FAITH- not just all of Israel.
You have to consider all the rest of the scripture. Hebrews tells us that the only way to please God is through what!? Faith.
Remnant is not all.
Do you believe God's discipline and chastisement is something we should strive to avoid?
I would say, yes, but it will never be fully avoidable. While we sin and err, we can expect chastisement. Nonetheless, God is always loving in his chastening.
- Trent
Please watch The church impotent- The History and theology of dispensationalism.
This documentary is a hit piece with no scripture, only biased history. Be careful to get advice from such men.
@@John3.36 there is tons of scripture and valid church history so I don't know what you're talking about.
@@JamesCalabrese-lc1tx Dispensationalism is a biblical hermeneutic, or way of reading the bible through literal/grammatical/historical methods. If you are going to convince people that their hermeneutic is incorrect, you will need to come up with a better one to replace it. With videos like this there is literally no hermeneutic, just a few verses without any exegesis. This is why Anti-Dispensational teachers will never be respected.
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ?
(Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30)
The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations?
1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8, 3:16.)
2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ?
3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds?
4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh?
5. Who is replacing the word “remnant” in Romans 9:27, with the word “nation”?
6. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers?
7. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"?
8. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost?
9. Based on Hebrews 12:18-24, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.)
10. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis?
11. Watch the TH-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church.
Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107.
Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323.
John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated…
"...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.”
John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.)
What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16?
(See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.)
Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth?
Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups?
Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24?
Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period?
Read the recent book "The Rise and Fall of Dispensationalism", by Daniel G. Hummel...
@@SpotterVideo These teachers have no credibility. Again, they start with an assumption and build on it, rather than letting the text speak for itself.
There are many books including "Dispensational before Darby" that clearly demonstrate that the 'only 200 year old' narrative is untrue.
@2:00 what about the decedents of Ishmael, Esau, etc.
Not sure why I put the other ones…
God said Abraham would have a kid with Sarai. He went aside on his own means with Hagar to produce Ishmael.
Ishmael, Esau and all of that lineage can be saved, but they weren’t the intent to fulfill the promise.
- Trent
@@BibleLine according to Paul(through inspiration of God), Christians took the promise:
”Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law? For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise. Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar. For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all. For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; Break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: For the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband. Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise. But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now. Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman. So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.“
Galatians 4:21-31 KJV
No response to that scripture?
I appreciate the use of scripture, and I hope you appreciate the time I choose to use to respond to you. 500+ comments come in weekly, so be patient. Can you expound on what you’re trying to say?
- Trent
@@BibleLinefair point. I apologize.
With the scripture, Paul is comparing those that continued to follow the law instead of turning to Christ with Ishmael and comparing Christians with Issac. There have been many forks in the road since Abraham concerning blood lines and nations that followed the LORD and then went astray. Not only are there examples, such as Esau, in the Old Testament, of the seeds of Abraham no longer being the seed, but the New Testament explicitly iterates throughout that the seed is Christ and christians are the heirs of that promise. Search Abraham in the New Testament and read all of those verses in context. I’m not hating on anyone and I believe that it is a free gift to all that believe, but it seems clear to me, from the Bible, that the heirs are christians now.
”And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven. But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.“
Matthew 8:11-12 KJV
Gen 12:3 And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.
Gal 3:8 And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed.
Gal 3:16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
New Covenant Whole Gospel: How many modern Christians cannot honestly answer the questions below?
Who is the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Who is the “son” that is the “heir” to the land in Matthew 21:37-43? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary?
What the modern Church needs is a New Covenant Revival (Heb. 9:10) in which members of various denominations are willing to re-examine everything they believe and see if it agrees with the Bible, instead of the traditions of men. We need to be like the Bereans. It will be a battle between our flesh and the Holy Spirit. It will not be easy. If you get mad and upset when someone challenges your man-made Bible doctrines, that is your flesh resisting the truth found in God's Word. Nobody can completely understand the Bible unless they understand the relationship between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary.
Romans Chapter 11: In its New Covenant context... There is no Plan B of salvation outside of the New Covenant Church in this passage. Plan A is found in verses 23 and 24.
In Romans 1:16 Paul said the Gospel was taken "first" to the Jews. This time period can be found in Matt. 10:5-7, and Acts 10:36-38, and Gal. 1:14-18. Many try to claim God never gave the Jews a chance to accept Christ, so there must be some Plan B of salvation before or during the Second Coming of Christ. Romans 1:16 proves they are wrong, since Paul said the Gospel went "first" to the Jews. Many ignore the fact that Peter addressed the crowd as "men of Judea", and as "men of Israel", and as "all the house of Israel" on the Day of Pentecost, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary. The Gentiles were not grafted in until several years later. This passage proves Paul was right about the Gospel being taken "first" to the Jews.
Were all of the Israelites "partially" hardened in Romans 11, or were part hardened and another part were not hardened? The answer is found in the "remnant" of Romans 11:5.
Paul reveals two different groups of Israelites in Romans 9:6-8. There is an Israel of the promise, and an Israel of the flesh. This is part of the context of Romans 11.
Paul speaks about the "remnant" of Israel in Romans 9:27. This is also part of the context of Romans 11.
Paul starts Romans 11 with two different groups of Israelites. In verse one Paul reveals he is still an Israelite, even after his conversion. Then Paul refers to two different groups of Israelites during the time of Elijah. There were the Baal worshippers, and there was the faithful "remnant". In verse five Paul says there is also a faithful "remnant" of Israelites during his time. This must be the Israelites who have accepted Christ, as on the Day of Pentecost.
Paul uses the two olive trees as a symbol of the New Covenant Church made up of believing Israelites, and believing Gentiles grafted together into the same tree. The unbelieving Israelites have been broken off but can be grafted back in through faith in Christ in verses 23-24.
Verse 26 is the problem for many modern Christians. What does the verse actually say, and how is it changed by many in the modern Church.
I have heard two of our nations famous preachers say the following.
"And then all Israel will be saved..."
I have heard another say the following.
"And all Israel will be saved..."
What does God's Word, recorded by the Apostle Paul actually say?
Rom 11:26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
The English word "so" is translated from the Greek word "houto", which is an adverb of manner, instead of an adverb of timing. Some have changed the word from "so" to "then", in order to change the meaning of the verse.
How will all of the "remnant" of Israel from Romans 9:27 be saved? The answer is found in the verses that precede verse 26 and are found below.
Rom 11:23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again.
Rom 11:24 For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree?
Paul quoted from the OT in referring to the Deliverer coming out of Sion to pay for sin. Did this happen at Calvary, or will Jesus die again for His people in the future?
Rom 11:27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
Verse 28 can only be understood by looking at how Paul started the passage. He started with two different groups of Israelites and he ends the passage in the same way. There are two different groups of "they" in verse 28. One group of "they" reject Christ and are the enemies of God, and another group of "they" are the election which accept Christ through hearing the Gospel and faith.
Rom 11:28 As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes.
Based on Luke 21:24b-28, the times of the Gentiles comes to fullness at the Second Coming of Christ. This agrees with what Paul said in Romans 1:16 about the Gospel going “first” to the Jews.
.
All people on the Earth are not the people of TMH YAH. There are also the corrupt seed of Ha'Shatan. They are the ones that have made the false doctrine that Christians replaced Yisrael. Romans 11:1 I say then, has YAH rejected His people? Let it not be! For I also am of Yisra’ěl, of the seed of Aḇraham, of the tribe of Binyamin.
Romans 11:2 YAH has not rejected His people whom He knew beforehand.
WRONG again
Although God is going to deal with Israel during the great tribulation, you have to understand Israel is spiritual, not physical
Paul made it clear that there is no more Jew or gentile ever again
Also, there is no more temple made by hand that God will ever dwell hand according to the Samaritan woman at the well story Jesus said he’s seeking worshipers who worship from spirit and truth, and not in a temple or up on a mountain certain mountain
So therefore, there is no fantasy feminine minded pre-tribulation rapture because revelation chapter 13 verse seven proves it. The antichrist makes war with the Saints, not physical Israel.
Trent and Jesse, could you please do a video on Johnathan Kleck. His TH-cam picture has JK on it. He says that in Genesis 1 Satan created man in his image and that in Genesis 2 is when the Lors God created adam and eve. He uses the strongs concordance, E-sword. He says that eve had sex with the serpent, because of the word touch, he said it means to lie with a woman. Then eve had twins cain and able. Cain is the serpents child and able is adams child. He said that we are the serpent race because satan created us in Genesis 1 and unless we get turned up and cut the line to the pit that we will go to hell. There's so so so much more you need to see that he is saying. He also says he is the angel of the church of Philadelphia and that he can heal certain people when God tells him to. I'm not saying anything back about this person, but he has a lot of followers. He used to have millions until his channel was taken down, and now it's back up. Please, please check into him and do a video, please. Thank you.
We will look into him! Thanks
- Trent
@BibleLine Thank you. I used to watch him years ago, but I stopped because he started getting really arrogant and treating people awful and he wasn't explaining how to get saved. It's so easy to get sucked into what he's showing with scripture and using e-sword.
That dude is a trip!!!!
Not born again!
He is out there!
But you seem to said something against Jackson knows other TH-cam channels that actually preach the gospel so I’m not sure what’s going on here but we need to correct this immediately please Ines you’re the one that said they don’t share the gospel or they’re not you know what you said anyway I’m not sure exactly how you put it, but you need to repent with simply means to change your mind about what you think about these other channels, cause I watch those channels and they preach the gospel all the time
Stop listening to Gregg Jackson. He is an unqualified online vlogger with no ecclesiastical authority, teaching unorthodox false doctrines.
Also, beware of any TH-camr who tells you not to go to church and only listen to him online. Online cults are a dangerous thing.
We didn’t say “they never share the gospel,” but it was posed in question form. It doesn’t seem as though they do due to all the James stuff as of late. Nonetheless, why take that and continue to beat on it?? Our main focus was regarding DB not GJ anyway… So far it’s been insults after insults from his followers. We made one video, and he made 3 plus 5 community posts….
- Trent
Well Jesse is a False Teacher who's leaning on his own understanding and doesn't have the Holy Spirit and doesn't have the authority to be doing this.
Apostates Predicted
These are grumblers, complainers, walking according to their own lusts; and they mouth great swelling words, flattering people to gain advantage. But you, beloved, remember the words which were spoken before by the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ: how they told you that there would be mockers in the last time who would walk according to their own ungodly lusts. These are sensual persons, who cause divisions, not having the Spirit. -Jude 1:16-19
For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ: whose end is destruction, whose god is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame-who set their mind on earthly things. -Philippians 3:18-19
@@HorrIV Sounds like something Satan would say, he's the accuser
I know people love GJ but he's not infallible, he makes mistakes too. Instead of correcting himself he dug his heels in and made a bunch of posts just stoking the fire for clicks and likes. Extremely immature and I unsubscribed from his channel.
We need to be concerned with what God teaches through scripture and defend that, not GJ.
A woman with under arm hair, hairy legs or her vg. It's all natural. As long as she is clean why should it matter? And not one thing mentioned about all the fake hair and make-up on their head and face.
What are you after here? I’m unsure our video has anything to do with this comment…
- Trent
????