Star Trek: Inside the USS Defiant Class Deck 1-5 (Update 2024)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 438

  • @Halfscreen
    @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Use code HALFSCREEN50 to get 50% OFF your first Factor box plus 20% off your next month of
    orders at bit.ly/3BeJRSJ!

  • @TheKnightsShield
    @TheKnightsShield 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +162

    Tough little ship.

    • @Eviltot
      @Eviltot 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +94

      Little?

    • @Vindix007
      @Vindix007 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      @@Eviltot I understood that reference.

    • @CaptainSovereign
      @CaptainSovereign 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Little?

    • @SimplyG.G
      @SimplyG.G 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@CaptainSovereignI understood that reference.

    • @jonathanbair523
      @jonathanbair523 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      She needed O'Bryan to fix her power problem, as she was over powered at first!

  • @johnslavik7629
    @johnslavik7629 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    My all time favorite star trek ship. Period.

    • @danielland3767
      @danielland3767 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same with Prometheus right behind it

  • @TeraQuad
    @TeraQuad 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    Defiant more than likely had Sonic Showers, so the use of the water from water tanks was not needed.

    • @tiegepike6076
      @tiegepike6076 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yeah, using pure speculation and not know where they got their information from id assume the water tanks were for the replicator system. Replicators change the form of matter so why not use water as its easy to store in tanks.

    • @charlesball6519
      @charlesball6519 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@tiegepike6076 the storage tanks were likely deuterium and tritium, aka heavy water.

  • @Paradigmfusion
    @Paradigmfusion 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

    Funny thing was the only way Romulans would let the federation borrow that cloaking device was if it was operated by a romulan crew member. They kept this up for like 2 episodes then never brought up again.

    • @eXcommunicate1979
      @eXcommunicate1979 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      It was also only to be used in the Gamma Quadrant.

    • @chefdean7257
      @chefdean7257 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Paradigmfusion That Romulan ended up being a Bajoran Maquis, who ended up being a Cardassian spy !

    • @sw-gs
      @sw-gs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      She died during first encounter with Dominion.

    • @chefdean7257
      @chefdean7257 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@sw-gs Technically, no, she didn't. It was a simulation. And if no one knew, it's the same actress that played Seska, Marsha Hackitt, I think.

    • @thomasloki1276
      @thomasloki1276 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the question is, why no klingon cloaking device? at this moment the starfleet and klingons are not in war.

  • @michaeltaylor8777
    @michaeltaylor8777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Defiant and Voyager are my two favorite ships

  • @mike595
    @mike595 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    This ship actually continued to change sizes in DS9. It was made to look larger when docked with DS9, but their size differences where huge. The ship varied in size for whatever the writers deemed was necessary for the episode.

    • @michaelgautreaux3168
      @michaelgautreaux3168 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      According to somebody's cannon, there are 6(six) different variants - sub classes for this space frame
      Adamant
      San Paulo
      Galant
      Vigilant
      Valiant &
      Defiant - Defiant A. Somewhere between 185+ to 250+ m. 🤔
      I like the 173m reference.

    • @ensignmjs7058
      @ensignmjs7058 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The person who designed it should know its true size.

    • @doct0rnic
      @doct0rnic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah I always thought it was too small for what they did with it, I was always surprised to see more rooms in a tiny ship

    • @kylereese4822
      @kylereese4822 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Would love to see a Star Trek series where a USS ship gets pushed into an alternative universe by the Borg at Wolf 359...
      There survivors of USS ?(smaller Excelsior type ship) find them self's on a critically damaged ship( Nacelle's missing, deflector missing, front section of the saucer missing) but have basic propulsion....
      Shields are top priority for ship integrity.....
      In this Alt-verse they are forced to Rebuild the ship with parts found that are from different timelines/periods....
      Nacelle`s replaced with 2 USS Defiant Class ships(70 years after DS9)....
      Deflector from a Jenolan gen ship(30 years before Relics ).....
      Saucer section is now a front section of a Klingon ship(Star Trek Motion picture generation)
      The defiant replicators are use to replace systems that were destroyed.

    • @ThatsMrPencilneck2U
      @ThatsMrPencilneck2U 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      After the original series, and except for the refit Enterprise itself, scale has always been goofy. Right there, with the first movie, the shuttle bay on the back of the Klingon battle cruiser is too small to function, and from there, it steadily gets worse.

  • @niagarawarrior9623
    @niagarawarrior9623 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I'm glad you covered the warhead in greater detail,
    it's a surprisingly overlooked aspect of the ship.
    Also, its kind of wild to imagine evacuating the crew to the 'warhead', and having 30 people cram into a massive antimatter bomb that is armed with full a compliments of torpedo's and a couple of bedrooms.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I felt that 30 people seem a bit too much, but that is based on the spec on the blueprint.

    • @nriqueog
      @nriqueog 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Halfscreen Most military's have a A-B protocol where you can fit the maximum number of people into the smallest available space. A-B refers to A-hole to Bellybutton, crew comfort is not an option. ;)

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nriqueog Nice to know. : )

  • @DZMaven
    @DZMaven 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    The Defiant is an interesting little ship. Part of it's weirdness though is due to a scaling up decision that was made during it's finalization stages that mixed a few things up. The bridge was orginally in the nose piece and would serve as an emergency escape module while the docking port was on the backside.

  • @MrShadow-qz9xj
    @MrShadow-qz9xj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    The small med bay is easily explained, it was not meant to operate independently for an extended period of time. So
    the sick bay was intended to essentially keep the wounded alive. until they could be transferred to another ship or station with better medical facilities.

    • @MichaelJohnson-vi6eh
      @MichaelJohnson-vi6eh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agreed this would be part of an attack group with other ships possessing better sensors, more facilities, more troops, etc.

    • @Yandarval
      @Yandarval 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@MichaelJohnson-vi6eh I believe bashir was disgusted the first time he went aboard. As there was NO sickbay. Only some medkits. As the Defiant was designed to beat on Borg ships. It makes sense, most crew will be dead or assimilated againt the projected Borg cube fights. Everyone forgets the Defiants were supposed to use pack tactics, not go it alone againt the Borg. Most ships would not have survived.

    • @AndrewJohnson-oy8oj
      @AndrewJohnson-oy8oj หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, as an escort it was never intended to operate independently for extended periods.

    • @alvinbanks
      @alvinbanks 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Yandarval Bashir said "the medical bay is practically nonexistent, he downloaded as many files from the station as he could...this ship simply wasn't design to handle many casualties." The ship had a small medical bay, it just wasn't large like the one Bashir had on DS9 or any of the other Star Fleet exploration ships because it's an escort ship...as Sisko said "It's essentially a war ship." Re-watch DS9 S03E01 The Search, Part I again.

  • @BigFrankieC
    @BigFrankieC 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Fantastic video. I love these.
    Only one note: "Dorsal side" is the top of the ship, and "ventral side" would be the bottom of the ship.

  • @TheWarBird01
    @TheWarBird01 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Ah yes the Defiant otherwise known as Sisko's Motherfen Pimp Hand.

    • @zomfragger
      @zomfragger 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      D***t you beat to it.

    • @forexed8948
      @forexed8948 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Worf's Apartment.

  • @aeonjoey3d
    @aeonjoey3d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    you're gettin gso much better with every video! bravo! loving the accurate livery and coloration!

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you like it!

  • @ditzydoo4378
    @ditzydoo4378 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    What I find humorous is that this was considered a small ship. Step outside and find a point 170 meters away and 134 meter in breadth. That is quite a large area and now multiple that by 3-full levels (1 through 3) not counting the minimal area of decks-4 and 5. This is borne out by the cutaway views which have figures to scale standing in hallways that look like aircraft hangers. That is a lot of volume. The hand drawn areas views like Sick Bay, Mess Hall and Crew Quarters are incredibly out of scale in relation to the scale of the deck cutaways. As to the detachable (warhead) I too think this was more of a mission pod, but did have a last stand use prior to ship self-destruction. And yes, it should have a second navigational deflector behind the mission pod.

    • @littlekong7685
      @littlekong7685 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I could see the logic behind it. Regular duties: Science station/extra crew quarters. Borg incursion? One big ass suicide weapon to cripple the borg ship so friendlies can finish it off. At that point it doesn't matter if the ship is defenceless or crippled it saved the federation or it failed and would be destroyed either way.

    • @DrewLSsix
      @DrewLSsix 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I could see it being conceptualized but not really deployed. If it's a last ditch weapon that effectively strands the vessel where it is then the ship is probably in pretty bad shape. I imagine the general rule is, torpedoes are not loaded with antimatter until they are about to be fired, or else racks and racks of loaded torps are a huge risk should the vessel take a hit in the wrong place.
      So, if you are facing that dire situation where the ship is all but lost, what are the chances you'll get all that antimatter fed into those warheads without the whole thing going up like a powder keg as the enemy keeps pounding away at you?
      Otherwise, we have to assume that ships just fly around with dozens or hundreds of individual antimatter containment vessels, and just hope that they are all perfectly reliable.

    • @ditzydoo4378
      @ditzydoo4378 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DrewLSsix all true, but I still side with Kirk. I too don't believe in the no win scenario. ^~^ now to find the programing for this Holodeck.

    • @nagash303
      @nagash303 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      3 Kilometer borg cube: go bite my shiny Metall outer hull.

    • @ditzydoo4378
      @ditzydoo4378 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@nagash303 Yep Bender, and it's housing a normal 130,000 Borg drones at any given time. She be Thicc.

  • @MrPhinn1
    @MrPhinn1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for this extremely detailed video. This ship (and the Sovereign Class Enterprise) are my favourite ST ships.

  • @beckhamhome
    @beckhamhome 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Not being critical but observant. Many Star Trek ships are laid out like an apartment or office building. With everything stacking neatly and lots of space. Take a look at current ship architecture, many bits of equipment built into the walls. Large equipment built around, very little free space. Nothing stacked like neat little boxes in a warehouse. Turning, acceleration, deceleration and turbulence causes lateral forces. Lots of blast tight doors and bulkheads, not long running hallways.

    • @phillipthorne8363
      @phillipthorne8363 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I agree, and I think it's a combination of things: Master System Displays on TV, which show evenly-spaced decks, which might be schematic; tradition ever since the "Star Trek Star Fleet Technical Manual" of neatly-packed compartments; trying to rationalize the TV sets; and a mindset which is graphical ("what fits in this corner? let's doodle..") rather than engineering ("how much volume would these functions need, and how much piping between them? let's start with a spreadsheet...").

    • @guywithinterwebs
      @guywithinterwebs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@phillipthorne8363 also, operating in space with inertial dampeners in a post scarcity society basically eliminates all the pressures that cause these modern space saving design choices. If cost wasn't a factor, and size/mass had no impact in speed, maneuverability, and efficiency, you'd likely see larger and more spacious military ships as well.

    • @doct0rnic
      @doct0rnic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you want to know what it's like to live on a federation ship, stay in a Red Lion for six months.

    • @stevenscott2136
      @stevenscott2136 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Starfleet still doesn't think like warship designers, so you can expect some mistakes.
      I'd like to see a sci-fi show set in a realistic ship design, but it would probably be prohibitively difficult to film in. Even the Expanse made their ship interiors oddly roomy.

    • @beckhamhome
      @beckhamhome 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@stevenscott2136 It's not Starfleet thinking like naval ship designers. It's the artist not thinking like Naval ship designers. Ships get designed with engines, bulkheads and other large pieces placed into the hull. Then the little things like storage and crew quarters. Answering other post, with inertial dampeners and other scifi magic is just adding to over simplified designs cause nothing ever fails. Just looking at the cover page. Huge unused area lets make the ship smaller or fill those spaces. You've got storage drums? Why isn't that stored in a tank like fuel to be used. Why carry lose in storage, place it into the system for use as needed. "Hey call Robert in the warehouse our plasma relays are a few gallons low." Star Trek artist need to look at real world designs. Maybe a few glimpses at Star Wars, those little ships are packed tight.

  • @dalenewton9161
    @dalenewton9161 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    HT, Always enjoy viewing your latest commentary. You are the master.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching Dale! Hope you're doing well.

  • @Silverfoxwolfen
    @Silverfoxwolfen 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Interesting video, I always read that the Defiant had only one shuttle and it was installed in the centre section as a drop bay like the NX-01 Enterprise used. It was installed in an area that was 'for future expansion and development'.

  • @alvaroplazafebres
    @alvaroplazafebres 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    my favorite ship!!!

    • @fixer1140
      @fixer1140 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A tough little ship

  • @TrentonBennett
    @TrentonBennett 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I love the Defiant. I was heart wrenched when they destroyed her in Season 7 but then of course gave birth to her again a few episodes later. It was a ballsy move to destroy the Defiant and a lot of fans didn't like that.
    Actually the Engineering station was the front console left of the Conn/Ops station. Tactical was on the right side of Conn and Ops as seen in the various episodes. Science I believe was on the left of the Captain's Chair and Communications was on the right of the Captain's chair. See the episode when the Defiant is destroyed.
    Bashir regarding assigning Odo to quarters in "The Search": I'll handle it, sir. I need to check out what is laughing called "The Sickbay" to which Sisko thanks the Doctor.
    Edit: Also there's no indication that the Defiant was able to fire AFT QUANTUM torpedoes. It only showed firing regular torpedoes with the aft launchers.

  • @LB5111
    @LB5111 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Still trying to figure out how you boarded the ship through the main deflector.

    • @guywithinterwebs
      @guywithinterwebs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      hmmm.... perhaps it has a door built into it like those giant clock tower clock faces. lol

    • @stevenscott2136
      @stevenscott2136 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@guywithinterwebs Great -- they hired Batman to design that part of the ship. 😁

  • @MatthewCaunsfield
    @MatthewCaunsfield 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video and a bold effort , given the variable size of the ship onscreen! Not to mention the changing number of decks 😉

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks! 👍 I have trying to update these videos for errors and new additional information.

  • @martinhardt1701
    @martinhardt1701 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    What about all these windows apparently located in the housing of the fresh water tanks...?🤔

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Sometimes, the 3d assets don't exactly fit the blueprint diagram, hence a miss alignment. I didn't model the Defiant.

    • @deepdragon2
      @deepdragon2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      They are used for Finding Nemo...

    • @macavitythemysterycat
      @macavitythemysterycat 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Halfscreen We're not asking if the 3D assets match the blueprint, we're asking why you modeled exterior windows next to water tanks?

    • @WozWozEre
      @WozWozEre 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cetacean Ops my man.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@macavitythemysterycat I didn't model the exterior, only the interior, and my model is just a close approximation.

  • @theharbingerofconflation
    @theharbingerofconflation 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    if you don't expect to limp away at light speed you don't need a deflector, see the Galaxy Class Saucer Section. I think the warhead was for situations where you in a critical position to end the battle. Although, to me the design always looked more like this could eventually be a modular section with different attachments. A big escape pod for example with its own cloak

  • @eXcommunicate1979
    @eXcommunicate1979 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for putting the impulse engines in the right spots. Most diagrams and artwork put them in the rear cowling, as does the (incorrect) plan in the DS9 tech manual.

    • @Yandarval
      @Yandarval 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its easier to point out the stuff that was correct in the DS9 tech manual. That book for a travesty. In addition to falling apart quicky, due to cheap materials.

  • @dennischristopher9952
    @dennischristopher9952 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I liked the claustrophobia bridge design. It made the ship feel like a submarine.

    • @micha640
      @micha640 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Reminds me also on a bird of prey bridge. Well designed .

  • @lylehoanshelt179
    @lylehoanshelt179 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My favorite little Starfleet battleship

  • @y2keef
    @y2keef หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just stumbled across this gem. Now, although the detachable warhead is totally impractical, it does add a bit of flair to the "Ramming Speed" line in First Contact.

  • @dr.zippymcscoots8725
    @dr.zippymcscoots8725 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I always thought that the Captains quarters should be near the bridge. Just seems to make sense.

  • @portmanjohn1
    @portmanjohn1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Great video. Thanks for your hard work

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      My pleasure!

  • @frankgesuele6298
    @frankgesuele6298 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tough,compact & nimble.
    Exactly what you needed for war⚔

  • @jeffburnham6611
    @jeffburnham6611 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I'm always amazed at how the best Starfleet ships are no match for Klingon, Cardassian, Roman or Dominion ships. The first fight the Defiant had was against the Dominion and they nearly destroyed it.

    • @aquariandawn4750
      @aquariandawn4750 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This is because in literature the hero's journey commonly starts out with a setback, the hero's journey is in learning how to overcome adversity. Federation are the heroes.

  • @nicholasklangos9704
    @nicholasklangos9704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Always my favorite ship from Star Trek!

  • @panagiotischristo
    @panagiotischristo 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Great video... however where is the holedeck, like the episode where ds9 crew worked with the Dominion to counter the rouge Dominion?
    Will watch the video again if i missed it.
    But this is my favorite ship, so is the romulan warbird, enterprise nx01, and ds9.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I will have to look into that. 🤔

  • @peters6345
    @peters6345 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I really liked this ship when i was a kid. Was excited when it first got introduced in DS9, oldschool series sure could change things up

  • @kingdavewoody
    @kingdavewoody 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm trying to figure out the DS9 timeline. So Wolf 359 happened, with Sisko there. Did he then start developing the Defiant after that, then when it was mothballed he was posted to DS9?
    I love the idea that after the borg attack, Sisko made it his personal mission to design a ship to fight the borg, kinda like revenge

    • @rodneytrotter3725
      @rodneytrotter3725 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Sisko didn't have anything to do with the beginning of the design of the Defiant. It was started after Wolf 359 to fight the Borg, but the Borg threat seemed to loosen and the Defiant was running into a lot of design errors, like Sisko told his crew, the first testing of the Defiant and it nearly shook itself apart, so it was mothballed. After the threat of the Dominion seemed to be more of a reality than the Borg, Sisko went back to Earth and implored Starfleet to reexamine their look on the Defiant as a deterrent now to the Dominion.

    • @logicplague
      @logicplague 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@rodneytrotter3725 Ehh, I think he did. There was a time gap between Wolf 359 and Sisko taking command of DS9. I was under the impression that he worked at the shipyard designing ships(Defiant, among others like the Akira and Steamrunner-classes), and then he was transferred to DS9. You are correct that Starfleet temporarily mothballed the anti-Borg ships(after one ABSOLUTE hail-Mary victory.....), and later re-examined them after the Dominion-threat. This is likely what led to Sisko's reassignment.

  • @gargoyleb
    @gargoyleb หลายเดือนก่อน

    I never learned that much about the Defiant. NOW I know why Worf enjoyed her so much.

  • @logicplague
    @logicplague 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Defiant didn't come with ablative armor, that was a later "per-Sisko" upgrade.

  • @GBnet2
    @GBnet2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love this break down. I find it interesting that the defiant carries literal water for hygiene instead of using sonic showers. I wonder what the lore reason would be for that? Also why not replicate water instead of carrying it? 🤔

  • @michaelsutherland5848
    @michaelsutherland5848 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    But.. how do they navigate? Where's Cetacean Ops??

    • @GodOfWar109
      @GodOfWar109 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Smaller ships don't need it. Only long range ships need it

    • @davrk5429
      @davrk5429 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They have a goldfish in the mess hall

    • @bmused55
      @bmused55 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not every ship has Cetaceans on board. Originally, it was only the deep space explorer types that had them, to assist in navigating the vast emptiness. Ships like the defiant are not equipped for that sort of mission.

  • @flangeclamp4239
    @flangeclamp4239 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    One of the VERY few saving graces of DS9.

  • @macavitythemysterycat
    @macavitythemysterycat 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your "impulse Fusion Generator" structure at timecode 11:03 is identical to your "Emergency Life Support Systems" on Deck 1 at timecode 7:45

    • @Dead_Kerbal
      @Dead_Kerbal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nerd...

    • @O-.-O
      @O-.-O 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Dead_Kerbal You must be truly mentally challenged if you didn't notice under which video you made your comment 😂😂😂

    • @Dead_Kerbal
      @Dead_Kerbal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@O-.-O And the obvious reference passed over your genius head, mate.🙄

  • @malloryemclaren
    @malloryemclaren 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    There’s a lot more room to move than this is given credit for. May be little by 2370s standards, not ours.

    • @logicplague
      @logicplague 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Little, given that before this, most of Starfleet were used to serving on ships with gyms, schools, science labs, etc.

  • @mbogucki1
    @mbogucki1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The warhead was meant as a last resort weapon against a Borg cube. I don't think anyone was expected to survive at that point making the need for a deflector a moot point.

  • @Slim1423
    @Slim1423 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I liked the Defiant! It was a small, powerful ship that could move real fast and fire off multiple shots! Since it was a small ship, it's size gave it an advantage over larger starships.

  • @johnmasonRCingabout
    @johnmasonRCingabout 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I didn't realise the Defiant was so big, I thought it was much smaller.

  • @johnlewis1830
    @johnlewis1830 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think you did a great job explaining deck 5.
    🖖

  • @al28854
    @al28854 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And I thought those external 'windows' (next to the tankage bay) on deck 4 all facing to the middle of the ship was for crew quarters. Also it would have been so interesting to of had a scene involving the warhead/lifeboat/crew quarters/ telescoping docking port, something fitting in S6,E22 'Valiant'.

  • @oilandgasanimations677
    @oilandgasanimations677 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the info on the USS Defiant!

  • @TygerBlueEyes
    @TygerBlueEyes 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When it docks to DS9 it with front module "the warhead section" -- how does the crew transfer back in forth between the ship and the docking ring? Did I miss the hatch and walk way?

  • @WheelLock
    @WheelLock 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    but where's the docking hatch for DS9?

    • @peteb81
      @peteb81 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It’s above the deflector in the nose section. You can see it clearly marked in the diagram shown in the middle of the video, although it’s modelled below the deflector on the cgi in the video. It wasn’t modelled on the model used in the show but we can assume it’s behind a hull panel on the actual ship, like the two on either side of the refit Enterprises saucer section.

    • @HeatherHerbert_
      @HeatherHerbert_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@peteb81 at 11:58

  • @michaeldominic3183
    @michaeldominic3183 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Just a FYI it is pronounced Ah-BLAY-tive. 🙂

    • @coryburkhardt
      @coryburkhardt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      It sounds like AI.

    • @starsiegeplayer
      @starsiegeplayer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      He uses a tts for his videos.

    • @redbynight
      @redbynight หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nah it's pronounced correctly. The whole world except the US pronounces it like in the video 😊

    • @michaeldominic3183
      @michaeldominic3183 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@redbynight I am curious how you know that the entire world says it differently. lol. No matter my version is how it is pronounced on the show so that pronunciation is cannon. 😁

  • @Paulsr7
    @Paulsr7 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i like how it is designed like a giant dart board with the bridge as the bullseye. do they put maximum shields there?

  • @bobdinwiddy
    @bobdinwiddy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    wonderful visualisation : excellent presentation : absorbing breakdown : thorough design-programme : a complete and functional warship . . . the ONLY thing truly missing in this a worthy naval-architectural / structural breakdown of the keel, ribs, shells, cells, joints, mesh and webbing . . . but - hey - these are film sets not real spaces ;)

    • @phillipthorne8363
      @phillipthorne8363 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      SF blueprints and cutaways tend to overlook the volume that should be occupied by structural elements. For saucer-shaped vehicles, they tend to overlook unusable space caused by sharply-curved upper and lower hulls; Trek blueprints include turboshafts, but overlook all the space for Jefferies tubes and power conduits -- presumably big ones, feeding phaser strips and shield grids. Plans for the Defiant in particular have to interpret the official excuse of "that feature exists, but it's hidden behind a retracting hull panel, trust us."

    • @bobdinwiddy
      @bobdinwiddy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      like the space 1999 eagle cockpit :) wholly Tardis-like on the inside 😂

  • @FirstNameLastName-okayyoutube
    @FirstNameLastName-okayyoutube 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I want an explanation as to why so many models only have the top two pulse phaser cannons.

  • @bmused55
    @bmused55 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Some issues here and there, but otherwise a fine breakdown of this design.
    But FYI: Starfleet vessels use sonic showers, so do not need a water supply. Nor do they need potable water tanks as all the water the crew needs for drinking and food come from the replicators.
    I'm not aware of any need for water, except perhaps for cooling of equipment and machinery.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's really based on the schematic on the internet, and information can vary greatly depending on resources given.
      www.cygnus-x1.net/links/lcars/cyd-defiant.php

  • @rextrek
    @rextrek 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    65th as a Huge fan..and a kid when TOS aired.....I appreciate how they are explained as IF they're REAL...... my Fave ship is Voyager

  • @nicholasmorsovillo2752
    @nicholasmorsovillo2752 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    We have to remember Commander Benjamin Sisko was in charge of the design and construction of the U.S.S. Defiant when it was built at the Utopia Planitia shipyards in orbit of Mars.

    • @krashd
      @krashd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah, as if you could oversee the construction of a ship while working full time on a space station halfway across the quadrant...
      Jadzia Dax -:"Did you say Ben was just visiting Bajor? Because no one has seen him for three years."

    • @stevenscott2136
      @stevenscott2136 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@krashd I suspect it was more of a figurehead position. The real US Navy does some similarly silly stuff when it comes to making captains feel special.

    • @Elitrian
      @Elitrian 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He could have been doing it before being reassigned to Deep Space Nine.

    • @logicplague
      @logicplague 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@krashd You do know there's a time gap between Wolf 359, and Sisko taking command of DS9, right?

  • @MagicWok
    @MagicWok 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Missed out a bunch of other weapon ports in the overview...

  • @ThorstenWieking
    @ThorstenWieking 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video, but I doubt the shuttlebays two and three and especially the included Workbees. The Defiant is too small to have such a big complement of auxiliary craft.

  • @dp2901
    @dp2901 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I still have a Playmates USS Defiant in my toy collection. It's my favorite.

  • @TekTravis
    @TekTravis 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very nice video, i had to go back and look when i sent you an email about how disappointed i was with that last Defiant video. 6/16/2023, But good to see you updated your info and model. Nice work.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Live and learn, It seem like most of my viewers are more knowledgeable about about these ships. : )

  • @coleycole2381
    @coleycole2381 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I want to know how big the runabouts are. The episode with the crashed upside gemhadar ship they showed up with like 13 people then when warf and dax take bashir the waitress and quark to risa , quark complians about being in a broom closet. Make it make sense?

    • @AndrewJohnson-oy8oj
      @AndrewJohnson-oy8oj หลายเดือนก่อน

      All ships are as big or as small as the writers need them to be for the story being told in that episode.

  • @kamenwaticlients
    @kamenwaticlients 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think instead of them saying it was a warhead they should of stuck with the idea of it as a larger detachable ship similar to the saucer of other ships but used for transport and evacuation of troops and others in the battle field.

  • @lynngreen7978
    @lynngreen7978 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Given the limited crew space, it begs the question, was sickbay equipped with an EMH? Double the medical care available, without an extra body to require a berth, supplies, etc.

    • @NeonVisual
      @NeonVisual 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Probably all the doctors go on strike because they think they are being replaced by holograms. They're right. Might as well add an ECH while you're at it, get rid of all those useless commanders and captains to make more space for quantum torpedoes.

    • @MrShadow-qz9xj
      @MrShadow-qz9xj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is stated that each ship was to be equipped with an EMH. That said with Defiant being so small, it may not have been, either due to it's small size... Or the bulk of the power being used for combat and defensive systems... Not mention the sickbay as stated was not much more then a field hospital.... Obviously only intended to stabilize the injured until they could be transferred to a larger starship or a space station.

  • @TrangleC
    @TrangleC หลายเดือนก่อน

    Was there ever a instance where the nose-section actually detached from the rest of the ship? I think I have seen every episode of DS9 back in the day and don't recall that ever happening, or any of the characters mentioning that it could do that. It seems to me the assumption that it actually can detach is just speculation based on nothing but the fact that it somewhat looks as if it might do that and that we know that the D-class can detach its saucer section.
    Back in the 90s, when the show was still new, where I grew up (Germany) there was this subscription service that would send you new data sheets and articles to put into a clip folder that would over time make a complete compendium or encyclopedia of Star Trek. There were cutaway renderings of Federation and Alien ships too and I remember that the one featuring the Defiant didn't show any detachability (if that is a word) either.
    I assume this existed in other countries too, but I am not sure, because this kind of stuff was quite common and typical in Germany back then and it might have been something that only existed in the German speaking world (including Austria and Switzerland).
    There were all sorts of such subscription services. They would always start by sending you a laminated, fancy clip folder and then you would get new pages to file into it every month, which would over time make up a encyclopedia.
    In the case of the Star Trek one, it was 5 or 6 pages every month, if I remember correctly. They were color coded and you had to put them into categories, like "Alien Races", "Federation Ships", "Alien Ships", "Characters", "Technology" and "History" or something along those lines. You would then get one blue sheet with a cutaway or made up blue prints for a Federation ship, a green one about a Alien ship, like a Klingon Bird of Prey for example, a white sheet with a encyclopedia article about some character, a brown one about the Cardassian home world for example and so on.
    There were cooking recipe books that were sold like that, DIY car repair instruction manuals or fandom stuff like the Star Trek encyclopedia I mentioned above.
    I had 2 subscriptions, the Star Trek one and one about military aircraft.
    Was that a common thing in other countries too?

  • @MrTimeless101
    @MrTimeless101 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wonder what's the explosive yield on that detachable warhead? It's a quarter the size of the ship.

  • @Organicfarmworker-hc8yf
    @Organicfarmworker-hc8yf 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can you please do some on real battleships that existed like HMS HOOD or other ships like that. I really like the Star Trek ones but would love to see the interior design of the battleships.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Try to, but my channel won't get any views due to YT algo.

    • @Organicfarmworker-hc8yf
      @Organicfarmworker-hc8yf 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think that there is a demand for something like that as there are a lot of videos on battleships and there really popular now. If you did some of the interior I think people would be really interested in them.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Organicfarmworker-hc8yf I have to think about it. 🤔

  • @Rocketman9mm
    @Rocketman9mm 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    why are there windows on deck 4 looking at tanks and equipment bays?

  • @TheForce3DAnimation
    @TheForce3DAnimation 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the details infor 3D animations!

  • @michaelgautreaux3168
    @michaelgautreaux3168 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Eagle w/ a skirt ! ❤️

  • @case1177
    @case1177 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Man, what is Starfleet gave the Sisko the Intrepid, or the nova class? the kind of destruction would have made a klingon blush!

  • @JeremiahDouglas
    @JeremiahDouglas หลายเดือนก่อน

    it's still a pretty big ship though all things considered. Ds9 Must of been HUGE!

  • @jmystmbrg
    @jmystmbrg 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sisko's Pimphand!!

  • @TheForce3DAnimation
    @TheForce3DAnimation 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I remember watching the series when I was younger.

  • @ChayMiddleton
    @ChayMiddleton 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why is the bridge on deck one the side cut away view view says it isint or is it showing everything upside down

  • @josebrown5961
    @josebrown5961 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was wondering, just where did the crew enter and exit from? I always thought they did it through the “nose” that was on the front.
    Oh and just how many shuttles did that little ship need? I wasn’t the biggest DS9 fan, did they ever use a shuttle from that ship?

    • @Dead_Kerbal
      @Dead_Kerbal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Teleporters, dude...

    • @josebrown5961
      @josebrown5961 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Dead_KerbalWhat, you mean transporters?

    • @phillipthorne8363
      @phillipthorne8363 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If I recall correctly, the show's staff have admitted that the model design, scripts, and set building budget (producing different sizes of shuttle in different seasons) didn't always coordinate. The official size of the ship got larger, so there was suddenly room for extra docking bays with extra specialized secondary craft. (I think there's one episode in which they're pursuing a Changeling, fire a phaser down a ladderway, and there are clearly more than five decks. This kind of mistake happens on a weekly TV show.)

  • @KyIeMcCIeIIan
    @KyIeMcCIeIIan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    It was all about putting the firepower of the Galaxy class in the smallest possible frame. A big part of the allure was it's use as a test bed for experimental and illegal tech, plus the power plant and main systems were so overpowered for so small a hull that it's integrity was always collapsing from it simply shaking itself apart with it's own power. In layman's terms, it was more likely to destroy itself than the enemy was in most situations.

  • @deralbtraumritter8573
    @deralbtraumritter8573 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why they call it a warhead? And how did have a docking port AND able to launch a probe (the probe was in the middle, seen in Season 4 Episode 7 I believe ).

  • @dannyjetersr.4579
    @dannyjetersr.4579 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Do you think u have enough info to do some ships from Stargate??🙏

  • @MAHAKALAXXXV
    @MAHAKALAXXXV 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    would be great if they made a 1:72 model of this ship with a possibility to open and view the interior

  • @nicholasmorsovillo2752
    @nicholasmorsovillo2752 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I find it funny that the shuttle bay of the Defiant was in the center of the ship and the way the shuttles were launched reminds me of the NX Class as their shuttlecraft were launched in a similar manner through the launch doors built into the ventral hull.

    • @smiddlehurst1
      @smiddlehurst1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Does make sense though considering her intended use. If you've gotta put a big empty space that vents directly into space do everything you can to minimise the chances of it getting hit in combat.

  • @KingSidJames
    @KingSidJames 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Would love to know how the ship docks at DS9.

    • @phillipthorne8363
      @phillipthorne8363 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      As seen on the show, it docked nose-first on the outer ring, at the base of a pylon. There's no visible docking port (as with movie refit-Enterprise and Enterprise-D) but it's under a retractable panel -- that's how the show's technical staff explained any oversights in the filming model.

    • @KingSidJames
      @KingSidJames 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @phillipthorne8363 So, that would mean walking through the warhead compartment at the front.

  • @MeNoOther
    @MeNoOther 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    14:21 looks like room to house a deflector array on each side of the ship in the main body

  • @GhostpainOG
    @GhostpainOG 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video. Just so you know, the word ablative is pronounced a-BLAY-tive.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks. Sometime, it tricky to get the AI voice to pronounce correctly.

    • @GhostpainOG
      @GhostpainOG 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Halfscreen No worries, that's what I figured the problem was.

  • @thewaldj
    @thewaldj 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wait, so all those windows on the underside/belly (decks 4 and 5 I believe) are looking in on water tanks?? Why put windows there at all then... I'd always assumed the crew quarters were down there, maybe the mess hall (rooms that actually might benefit somehow from windows)

    • @tiegepike6076
      @tiegepike6076 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think they were intended to be crew windows but the writers couldn't decide of how big the ship was and cant really fit enough deck space down there for quarters.

  • @ciebriel79
    @ciebriel79 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's a tough little ship. I hope he does a video on the Prometheus.

  • @carlmlavallierejr8367
    @carlmlavallierejr8367 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice!! Thx!!

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No problem!

  • @1sweaty901
    @1sweaty901 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    From a pure combat point of view, I am not sure about butting up the computer core directly next to the turbolift - a direct hit could channel the damage along all three decks and create damage to the CC - otherwise a great design and not a "little Ship"

  • @siskorhodes
    @siskorhodes หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best ship great video

  • @fakecubed
    @fakecubed 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I still don't understand how it docks with DS9 through its deflector array.

  • @ONEHENDRIX
    @ONEHENDRIX 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That’s a lot of detail.

  • @luiszuluaga6575
    @luiszuluaga6575 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Pretty awesome stuff. 😀

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for the visit

  • @aeonjoey3d
    @aeonjoey3d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    aren't those voyager's landing struts? :P

  • @MeNoOther
    @MeNoOther 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When will you do insides of the 32nd century ships?

    • @christopherpike8269
      @christopherpike8269 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      32nd century ships are powered by unicorns. It would be just a large hamster wheel with one or two unicorns running on it. Granted they would probably have some sort of wiring harness hooked up to their horns to make it look technical or maybe just to prevent tachieon partials from building up?

  • @ginger00022
    @ginger00022 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks!

  • @radeksparowski7174
    @radeksparowski7174 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    would be nice having a detailed achilles class to compare with

  • @Nerd_Detective
    @Nerd_Detective 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Hypothesis: the warhead module was originally envisioned to deliver heavy alpha strikes against Borg cubes before they could adapt. But the ship was already pushing the limits of what they could accomplish in such a small space, and once they did some early testing of the spaceframe they realized they didn't have enough room for all the ship's systems and accommodations. Solution? Move some crew quarters... and then the impulse fusion reactors... and then the main deflector into the warhead. This allowed them to size up other ship systems, allowing the prototype to just barely operate without shaking itself apart.

  • @CarlosRodriguez-v8d7u
    @CarlosRodriguez-v8d7u 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What are my thoughts? Well it was overhyped when debuted but didn’t live up to the hype especially when it faced the ENEMY IT WAS DESIGNED FOR in the movie first contact

  • @beyondu77
    @beyondu77 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've always thought that the detachable warhead was a stupid idea and made zero sense. As you said, that's where the deflector is at. They must have brought a temp in that day to write the detachable warhead into the canon of the ship.