In terms of collectability, the 116600 wins every time since it was a very limited run. Plus you get the ceramic bezel in a 40mm package and still don't have that date bubble. Now in terms of everyday wear, the previous version (16600) might be a better option. Smaller profile, and it isn't as thick as the ceramic version. Also for the folks that like the Comex connection, the 16600 was the last model that Comex officially received from Rolex back in 1997.
Agreed, especially the SD4k, it was only produced for 3 years max, I wouldn't be surprised if it's going to be super collectible in another 10-15 years.
That really is impossible to beat, timeless design, no cyclops, great size, well-proportioned case and super capable. You could go from a boardroom meeting to a saturation dive without ever having to change your watch.
The SD4k is indeed an absolute gem and to top it all off, it had a super short production run for Rolex standards. I wouldn't be suprised if someday it'll be just as collectible as the desirable vintage subs/seadwellers.
Had many seadwellers over the years and purchased the sd43. Lovely watch but uncomfortable for me. Sold it on and bought the sd4k. What an absolutely beauty of a watch and comfortable to wear all the time.
In 2007 I bought my sea dweller and I love it. Not sure if it’s a collectable model but it’s a nice looking watch and just read little bit different than a normal sub.
As much as I love the 5-digit seadweller, it can't be compared to the 6-digit 116600 in terms of collectability, to 16600 was produced for almost 2 decades or even longer than that, whereas the 116600 was only produced between 2.5-3 years max.
I have the SD4K on my wrist right now. In my opinion it’s the modern design spec that the Submariner should have followed. Perfect on the wrist, incredibly adjustable, and widely under recognized. Cheers for calling this one out
What I've heard is the adhesive couldn't handle the depth, and now they've advanced their adhesive technology. Regardless, the 116600 is where my sights are set. Much more pleasing lug proportions than even the 41mm (40.5mm) Sub.
It seems that the reason for the lack of the cyclops on the SD is because the glass is thicker, the date would not be readable due to the cyclops (distortion).
SD4K all the way 🙌 The reason for no cyclops is the glue technology back that time, that didn’t stand the pressure at 4K depth. They solved it today, unfortunately 😉
The 16600 has more tool niche to it. Have both , sd4k is really more jewellery to me than practical application, hence gets less wear time than the 16600, collectibility who cares
I actually have a sd 16600 for everyday wear which gets beat up in engine rooms on boats and does on average 2 dive a day. It’s fantastic. The bracelet stretched so I dropped a rubberb band on it. Then I have a 116600 sd4k which I bought thinking love the watch so much I will wear it when I dress up rather than my beat up 16600. But the sd4k has been in the. Cupboard for 99% of its life. So I hope it was a good investment or I can give it to my son one day.
First off love your Chanel and all. The. Content you bring about watches. I have a. As steel. Sub. Since 2000 and a 40 mm rose gold President. AP off shore. 42 mm. And a Rolex. Tridor. Master peace. That. A where on special occasions. But. The. Sub. Always look good in my 20s 30s and Now. 40s.
I wouldn't call it rare. Almost of the jewelers that carry Rolex have one in their inventory. Just not a lot of people interested in them, either because they don't know about them, or because they prefer the thinner Submariner. The only people watching Sea-Dweller videos are the ones who are aware of them. In less than 3 months I'll be purchasing a 116600.
Probably because they discontinued the previous 40mm SD and you couldn't get anything except the Deepsea for a number of years. They brought it back because people grumbled then disco'd again after a few years because it didn't sell. Now it's the last true seadweller. The SD43 is just a big sub.
Because the 16600 pre-ceramic Sea-Dweller was discontinued and replace by the 116660 Deepsea Sea-Dweller. There wasn't a Sea-Dweller for 6 years, until the release of the 116600 in 2014. Which is why he referred to it as the apology dweller. Then in 2017, Sea-Dweller celebrated it's 50th anniversary, and the 126600 43mm Sea-Dweller with the single red line and cyclops lens was released. 43mm is now the de facto size for the Sea-Dweller, making the 116600 the last 40mm Sea-Dweller, and the last Sea-Dweller without a cyclops, and the only 40mm ceramic Sea-Dweller ever produced.
It performed poorly in sales while it was in production. It was hard to distinguish from the 116610/114060 Submariner and cost a lot more. Combined with the short production run, it's not a common watch to come across, and if you did, you'd probably mistake it for a Sub anyway.
Very enjoyable episode! I agree, the 41mm Submariner is more elegant than the previous generation. I am wearing my Starbucks Sub while watching your video. Cheers!
@@Laguna2013 Rolex I mean any Rolex specially the submariner model has become a luxury watch, it is ridiculous to go diving with a watch like that. Is like having a Commodore 64 computer this days instead of a gamer computer. What you need to go diving is a Sunto computer not a date Rolex.
@@arqjavierobregon 1: Suunto, not Sunto. 2: Shearwater makes far superior dive computers to Suunto. So does Garmin, and so does Ratio. 3. It can't hurt having a dive watch as a backup. 4. The date complication doesn't matter even for multiday hyperbaric decompression, because you're not the one managing the decompression profile. A medical professional is the one doing that, and he's outside the hyperbaric chamber. The date complication is for everyday use, not for anything related to diving.
I would argue the SD4K is the best dive watch ever made by any company. There are cheaper dive watches, more luxurious dive watches, dive watches that can go deeper, but there isn't another dive watch that you can wear as a daily watch, a dress watch, a sports watch, a recreational dive watch, and a professional dive watch. The SD4K can do any kind of diving you can throw at it, whilst being a modest 40mm, and not being a hockey puck.
@@Tom_H327 I know funny, and that wasn't it. What it's designed for, and what it's used for are two different things. That's like saying IWC doesn't make aviation watches because most people who wear them aren't pilots. Rolex watches are designed to withstand abuse. That most of them are safe queens or only worn by desk divers doesn't mean they're not sports watches.
@@bloodymarvelous4790 well, I'm not a pilot, so I'm not interested in wearing/using a pilot's style watch. However, if I suddenly found myself flying an aircraft, well whatever I'm using to tell time, is on a "pilot's" wrist. My original comment was to just disagree with those who would wear an expensive watch (a luxury item) on any sort of outdoor activity or adventure on purpose. Rolex isn't as robust and rugged as we might think, but Rolex would have you believe it is.
That's partially true. Rolex never put the cyclops on the original seadwellers because it would pop off under pressure since it's glued on to the crystal. Now with the SD43 and the advancement in glues they can apply that Cyclops on the crystal again for those deeper rated depth watches.
@@impexRQ Imho the SD43 is better proportioned than the SD4K. The increased diameter and bracelet width matches better with its thickness. However, 43mm is just too big, and I hate that cyclops lens.
Strongly disagree, the submariner hulk, kermit, gmt batman are the hype pieces as many buyers of these watches buy because they are easily recognisable.
You need to look up the definition of hype pieces. These are underappreciated and undersold. These are definitely not hype pieces. There is zero hype about these particular models.
I wouldn't rush to judgement so fast, you could not be more wrong. And if you are trying to advocate for women, attempting to throw them under the bus to do it isn't going to help, it just makes you look awful. My advice is move on to another channel.
Maybe she doesn't know everything about the stats, and he's mentoring her while giving her exposure in the social media segment of the high-end watch industry at the same time. Did you even consider that? No, of course you didn't. You were way too busy looking for something to be aggrieved about. 3rd wave Feminist bull-shit is poison. Give it rest or continue searching for a life of vindictive misery if that's how you want to live. Have a good night. (If that's even possible in such an awful, tyrannical, patriarchy we all have to deal with in current year)
![[Part 1] ทารกน้อยถูกทิ้ง👶 หญิงชราเก็บขวดขายเลี้ยงดูเขาจนโต #โลกการละคร](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nPTDvFCExks/mqdefault.jpg)
The SD4K was the last true Sea Dweller and absolutely the best Rolex sport model
- no doubt
In terms of collectability, the 116600 wins every time since it was a very limited run. Plus you get the ceramic bezel in a 40mm package and still don't have that date bubble. Now in terms of everyday wear, the previous version (16600) might be a better option. Smaller profile, and it isn't as thick as the ceramic version. Also for the folks that like the Comex connection, the 16600 was the last model that Comex officially received from Rolex back in 1997.
The SD4k and black GMT are for the true aficionados of Rolex watches. None of the hype but all the class.
Is the black GMT still offered?
@Laguna2013 Only on secondary market as it was discontinued in 2019. By the way, the earlier ones have super luminova lume which some ppl prefer.
Agreed.
Agreed, especially the SD4k, it was only produced for 3 years max, I wouldn't be surprised if it's going to be super collectible in another 10-15 years.
That really is impossible to beat, timeless design, no cyclops, great size, well-proportioned case and super capable. You could go from a boardroom meeting to a saturation dive without ever having to change your watch.
The SD4k is indeed an absolute gem and to top it all off, it had a super short production run for Rolex standards. I wouldn't be suprised if someday it'll be just as collectible as the desirable vintage subs/seadwellers.
The cyclops date window is glued on, so it would not take pressure under water at the depth the SeaDweller is designed to go down.
Had many seadwellers over the years and purchased the sd43. Lovely watch but uncomfortable for me. Sold it on and bought the sd4k. What an absolutely beauty of a watch and comfortable to wear all the time.
I bought the SD4K 2 days ago. Absolutely love it. I've been working towards it for a year.
In 2007 I bought my sea dweller and I love it. Not sure if it’s a collectable model but it’s a nice looking watch and just read little bit different than a normal sub.
As much as I love the 5-digit seadweller, it can't be compared to the 6-digit 116600 in terms of collectability, to 16600 was produced for almost 2 decades or even longer than that, whereas the 116600 was only produced between 2.5-3 years max.
I have the SD4K on my wrist right now. In my opinion it’s the modern design spec that the Submariner should have followed. Perfect on the wrist, incredibly adjustable, and widely under recognized.
Cheers for calling this one out
I’ve always loved the SD, waaay more than the Sub. Beautiful watches 👌🏻😊
own both. awesome watches
SD16600❤❤❤
116600 - SD4K
What I've heard is the adhesive couldn't handle the depth, and now they've advanced their adhesive technology. Regardless, the 116600 is where my sights are set. Much more pleasing lug proportions than even the 41mm (40.5mm) Sub.
Absolutely- this is why I love the SD4K
Yup, the sd4k still has better proportions than even the new 41mm sub with the slimmer lugs. Also the sd4k doesn't look or wear that thick.
Thank you George and Elizabeth, very good video.
How many SD4Ks has been produced in only 2 and a half years? The SD4K is really really rare and it gets very difficult to get it
Yup get one if you can before more and more collectors jump into the bandwagon, the SD4k has all the hallmarks of a super collectible piece.
27,102
Plenty out there don’t expect to appreciate much more, that’s already happened, 27000 IS not rare, my 5 cents
130 on chrono 24
I have both of these watches and I reckon I’ll keep them forever :)
Thanks for this comparison. But where is the Submariner?
I like the SD4K , because that is the one that I have. 🙂
It seems that the reason for the lack of the cyclops on the SD is because the glass is thicker, the date would not be readable due to the cyclops (distortion).
SD4K all the way 🙌
The reason for no cyclops is the glue technology back that time, that didn’t stand the pressure at 4K depth. They solved it today, unfortunately 😉
The 16600 has more tool niche to it. Have both , sd4k is really more jewellery to me than practical application, hence gets less wear time than the 16600, collectibility who cares
this looks like an older Sea Dweller since no red text line?
I actually have a sd 16600 for everyday wear which gets beat up in engine rooms on boats and does on average 2 dive a day. It’s fantastic. The bracelet stretched so I dropped a rubberb band on it.
Then I have a 116600 sd4k which I bought thinking love the watch so much I will wear it when I dress up rather than my beat up 16600.
But the sd4k has been in the. Cupboard for 99% of its life. So I hope it was a good investment or I can give it to my son one day.
I think the Cyclops is stuck onto the sapphire and under pressure they can come off.
No one can kill the Sub :) It is the King even above the Daytona which has many fugly variations.
First off love your Chanel and all. The. Content you bring about watches. I have a. As steel. Sub. Since 2000 and a 40 mm rose gold President. AP off shore. 42 mm. And a Rolex. Tridor. Master peace. That. A where on special occasions. But. The. Sub. Always look good in my 20s 30s and Now. 40s.
Now finish high school and learn to type.
116600 SD4k - Rare!
I wouldn't call it rare. Almost of the jewelers that carry Rolex have one in their inventory. Just not a lot of people interested in them, either because they don't know about them, or because they prefer the thinner Submariner.
The only people watching Sea-Dweller videos are the ones who are aware of them.
In less than 3 months I'll be purchasing a 116600.
why was it referred to as "apology dweller?"
Great question…
Probably because they discontinued the previous 40mm SD and you couldn't get anything except the Deepsea for a number of years.
They brought it back because people grumbled then disco'd again after a few years because it didn't sell.
Now it's the last true seadweller. The SD43 is just a big sub.
Because the 16600 pre-ceramic Sea-Dweller was discontinued and replace by the 116660 Deepsea Sea-Dweller.
There wasn't a Sea-Dweller for 6 years, until the release of the 116600 in 2014. Which is why he referred to it as the apology dweller.
Then in 2017, Sea-Dweller celebrated it's 50th anniversary, and the 126600 43mm Sea-Dweller with the single red line and cyclops lens was released. 43mm is now the de facto size for the Sea-Dweller, making the 116600 the last 40mm Sea-Dweller, and the last Sea-Dweller without a cyclops, and the only 40mm ceramic Sea-Dweller ever produced.
Nobody had slept on it. Look at the price for the sd4k😅
It performed poorly in sales while it was in production. It was hard to distinguish from the 116610/114060 Submariner and cost a lot more. Combined with the short production run, it's not a common watch to come across, and if you did, you'd probably mistake it for a Sub anyway.
@@bloodymarvelous4790 one look at the bezel insert, def not a sub mate.
Sd4k feels more solid too love mine❤
Very enjoyable episode! I agree, the 41mm Submariner is more elegant than the previous generation. I am wearing my Starbucks Sub while watching your video. Cheers!
The submariner all the way, pure class with out the cyclops wart classic 🔥👌
I'd love a 14060M 2-liner to accompany the 116600 Sea-Dweller.
SD 43 for me. Love it. Best Rolex ever…🎉
Totally agree SD 43 the best!
You guys nailed it! Definitely big value in that SD4K and Black-black GMT no doubt! I call the Sea Dweller the Sub-killer!
The submariner is like a Lambo Murcielago, the SD4k is like the Murcielago SV, we all know which one is way more collectible.
Bit pedantic I know, but not keen on the term 'sport's watch'.
no apostrophe. Just "sports watch".
Besides, it's made for scuba diving, so it is a sports watch.
When you are diving the best submariner is the no date. You can not care or see the date
Unless you need to decompress over multiple days when you dwell in the sea, right?
@@Laguna2013 wrong
@@arqjavierobregon tell me more please, trying to learn about this
@@Laguna2013 Rolex I mean any Rolex specially the submariner model has become a luxury watch, it is ridiculous to go diving with a watch like that. Is like having a Commodore 64 computer this days instead of a gamer computer. What you need to go diving is a Sunto computer not a date Rolex.
@@arqjavierobregon 1: Suunto, not Sunto.
2: Shearwater makes far superior dive computers to Suunto. So does Garmin, and so does Ratio.
3. It can't hurt having a dive watch as a backup.
4. The date complication doesn't matter even for multiday hyperbaric decompression, because you're not the one managing the decompression profile. A medical professional is the one doing that, and he's outside the hyperbaric chamber. The date complication is for everyday use, not for anything related to diving.
I own a sd4k best sports watch Rolex have ever made ticks every single box
I would argue the SD4K is the best dive watch ever made by any company.
There are cheaper dive watches, more luxurious dive watches, dive watches that can go deeper, but there isn't another dive watch that you can wear as a daily watch, a dress watch, a sports watch, a recreational dive watch, and a professional dive watch.
The SD4K can do any kind of diving you can throw at it, whilst being a modest 40mm, and not being a hockey puck.
There isnt a single Rolex that's a "sports watch". Ok Ok, maybe they can be "E sports". 😂
Why’s that?
@@DeRobez Awe, come on, Bro. You didn't think that was funny? Haha. E sports is indoors my man.
@@Tom_H327 I know funny, and that wasn't it.
What it's designed for, and what it's used for are two different things. That's like saying IWC doesn't make aviation watches because most people who wear them aren't pilots.
Rolex watches are designed to withstand abuse. That most of them are safe queens or only worn by desk divers doesn't mean they're not sports watches.
@@bloodymarvelous4790 well, I'm not a pilot, so I'm not interested in wearing/using a pilot's style watch. However, if I suddenly found myself flying an aircraft, well whatever I'm using to tell time, is on a "pilot's" wrist.
My original comment was to just disagree with those who would wear an expensive watch (a luxury item) on any sort of outdoor activity or adventure on purpose. Rolex isn't as robust and rugged as we might think, but Rolex would have you believe it is.
Great video and always loved the SD43 although the sub date has always stole my heart.
I know it's not a Rolex 😂🤣
It was the glue on the cyclops. It would pop off that’s all. They figured it out.
And make it weird now with the SD43 …
That's partially true. Rolex never put the cyclops on the original seadwellers because it would pop off under pressure since it's glued on to the crystal. Now with the SD43 and the advancement in glues they can apply that Cyclops on the crystal again for those deeper rated depth watches.
The Sea Dweller was always 40mm - the new SD43 is just totally off
@@impexRQ let's just hope rolex keeps making the SD in 43mm so that makes the older SDs in 40mm special.
@@impexRQ Imho the SD43 is better proportioned than the SD4K. The increased diameter and bracelet width matches better with its thickness. However, 43mm is just too big, and I hate that cyclops lens.
The blonde lady is just delightful- beautiful elegant fingers. He talks too much - one mouth two ears. Realignment required.
lol theses are all hype pieces.
Strongly disagree, the submariner hulk, kermit, gmt batman are the hype pieces as many buyers of these watches buy because they are easily recognisable.
You need to look up the definition of hype pieces. These are underappreciated and undersold. These are definitely not hype pieces. There is zero hype about these particular models.
Guy doing all the talking... girl just saying yeah to affirm his opinions. Looks like this isn't a channel for me
I wouldn't rush to judgement so fast, you could not be more wrong. And if you are trying to advocate for women, attempting to throw them under the bus to do it isn't going to help, it just makes you look awful. My advice is move on to another channel.
Maybe she doesn't know everything about the stats, and he's mentoring her while giving her exposure in the social media segment of the high-end watch industry at the same time.
Did you even consider that?
No, of course you didn't.
You were way too busy looking for something to be aggrieved about.
3rd wave Feminist bull-shit is poison.
Give it rest or continue searching for a life of vindictive misery if that's how you want to live.
Have a good night.
(If that's even possible in such an awful, tyrannical, patriarchy we all have to deal with in current year)
Ohhh god 😂 !! Seattle the home of hypersensitivity!
Tataaa