In indian Version it is less than 3 stars because It is Euro NCAP where it is scoring 3 with Safety assist and ADAS Whereas It does not even have This important feature such as ADAS and safety assist
@@ashutoshsharma1831The European Swift-spec includes additional safety features such as the ADAS suite, which is not present in the version sold in India.
"Some areas of the dashboard were thought to pose a risk a risk to the knees and femurs of occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions and Suzuki did not demonstrate that the same level of protection would be provided to such occupants. The driver’s chest protection was weak; that of the passenger was marginal." This is an extract from euroncaps report. I don't care about ADAS but "drivers chest protection was weak" does not sound very safe.
I recently purchased a new 2024 Suzuki Swift in Italy and have already driven a few hundred kilometers in Milan. However, compared to other cars I own (such as the Toyota Yaris Cross), the system seems less responsive. When there are pedestrians in front of the car, the alert buzzer does not sound. I’m unsure if this is due to a low sensitivity setting or a manufacturing defect. I would appreciate it if other users could share their experiences.
@@BarkaDogyou do know the only cars that get five stars these days are either expensive,large suv's or both right? That is what Ncap whats you to buy,unless youre loaded which this argument is moot.
Not necessarily. EURO NCAP raised their standards recently so a comparison with older tests of other models is not possible as they would now score lower too. It is still a very safe car.
Bro this Euro ncap this has many tests like lane keep assist collision avoid system but bncap or gncap does not have this kinda safety tests so it is gonna score atleast ATLEAST two to three star which is an slight improvement from the all time worst one star😊😊😊😊
I can see alot of Tatajeets cribbing over only 3 stars, Tata Bhakto its Euro Standard Ncap not paid Gncap. This car also scored 4 stars in Japan Ncap. First let Tata send a car in any of these and then compare.And lot of them are talking about it's European and not Indian,only features are different for eg ADAS not chasis and structure.
If they didn't keep moving the goalposts, and increasing the best score, we'd have something to compare it with. As it is, it's TOTALLY irrelevant except for comparison with other cars tested in the very recent past.
@@sw20vp you havent had want to turn them off have you? They are buried in menus(for the most part Suzuki doesnt do that) and they turn right back on when you start the car again.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers when i see the side impact tests i think car structure is bad too... a car that make of her low weight a focal point, sure need to use less metal reinforce, the impact with the pole reached the inside of the car...
To anyone that was seriously considering buying this car and is not a keyboard warrior ,read the report and buy it. This report is indicative as to why EuroNcap(and all the agencies that follow their testing regime)cannot be trusted to deliver serious useful feedback about the safety potential of any vehicle. Their testing standards now focus more on ADAS and how much it restricts the driver(the more it does that the better) to the absurd such as how well the car does when its underwater. All the extra equipment that would need to be fitted to this car to get that five star rating would push it to be heavier,less fuel efficient ,cost way more and the end goal of all this,less enjoyable to drive. It is no wonder that EuroNcap easily recommends cars which are either not in the same class as this or something that costs three or five times more.Anyone who was seriously looking at this car wouldnt be looking at a Kodiaq or an E Class much less an X2.The utter elitist contempt in the statement from the secretary General of EuroNcap in thier latest press release is the neon sign showing where the organization is now and who they really represent.This organization has become less in tuned with what consumers actually want in a car and instead have gleefully hitched their ideology to that of safety obsessed automatons unconcerned with actual human objective reality. With each new iteration of their testing procedures it is becoming ever more evident that this and other testing agencies really dont want people actually driving cars,but instead have a computer do it for them, at speeds of less than 30kph. Point is ,if youre a serious car buyer,take Euro Ncap's recommendations with a very heavy dose of skepticism .
2020 toyota yaris 5 stars euro ncap, same segment, similar size , similar price , sorry to ruin your day Source : th-cam.com/video/DDr307KXpKk/w-d-xo.htmlsi=CultWlc5eLI-O4wi
Also want to add this video which is swift euro ncap from 7 years ago with less strict rules than the one with yaris in 2020 and it still didnt manage 5 stars Source : th-cam.com/video/V1a6DLBhntI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=LY6v8xoSRMk_cdef
@@DancingLight-c7w if youre going to do like for like,the only reason the Yaris scored that five star rating in 2017 was the ADAS because the actual crash results were worse than the Swift's in the test done in 2018. Additionally the Swift was a five star car in 2011 ,when ESC was the most advanced thing being assessed.
@@waychillbro the test result comments do not say that. Regardless even if it got the same score as the Yaris it would still be a four star car because of the ADAS,the fact it moved up an entire star with just the addition of some ADAS features says everything.
The safety features in both the Japan and Euro spec are very similar. It’s just that Japan NCAP has less stricter norms, hence making it easier to score higher
@@androo4519 yeah I read it afterwards on the report but how? the dummy looks like took a considerable hit, and by the pole's reach, it probably was moved over the shifter and the handbrake. Sure the side airbag should protect the driver but still seems very painful, and at that low speed.
The fact that this car got 3 star in euro ncap while scoring 4 star in jncap is because euro ncap is more tougher than jncap and it is based on strict rules and regulations. While coming to India , it scores only 1 or 0 stars not because of rigid rules in indian crash test . Its only because Suzuki will compromise safety and built quality in India even though it has a more easier regulations. Thats why I always avoid Suzuki cars. The only thing i found here is the partiality and discrimination of Suzuki to Indians. Nowadays most of the Indians won't prefer mileage than their safety and quality.
Small doesn’t equate to unsafe or safe. The engineering is everything and also the raised standards of EURO NCAP impact here. Comparison with other cars tested over the last few years is not possible due to changes. They need to rescore all current model tests to match the new standards.
![[UNCUT] บอสพอล แผลงฤทธิ์ บอสพระ-นักร้อง ก. โดนแฉยับ! I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 21 ต.ค. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XKf6HeftoPI/mqdefault.jpg)
In indian Version it is less than 3 stars because It is Euro NCAP where it is scoring 3 with Safety assist and ADAS
Whereas It does not even have This important feature such as ADAS and safety assist
This is European Swift. Indian Swift will be 1 star max.
Stop splitting the truth maruti suzuki is da best!!!
Oh so you think Companies double their Research and make same car with two different chasis
Mr go and read the detailed pdf report. It is safe.
@@ashutoshsharma1831who’s going to tell him
@@ashutoshsharma1831The European Swift-spec includes additional safety features such as the ADAS suite, which is not present in the version sold in India.
To all the people go and read the pdf published about the rating about the swift in their website. it is still a safe car.
"Some areas of the dashboard were thought to pose a risk a risk to the knees and femurs of occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions and Suzuki did not demonstrate that the same level of protection would be provided to such occupants. The driver’s chest protection was weak; that of the passenger was marginal."
This is an extract from euroncaps report. I don't care about ADAS but "drivers chest protection was weak" does not sound very safe.
No it’s not
@@gateh2337it's still safer than 2000s cars
I recently purchased a new 2024 Suzuki Swift in Italy and have already driven a few hundred kilometers in Milan. However, compared to other cars I own (such as the Toyota Yaris Cross), the system seems less responsive. When there are pedestrians in front of the car, the alert buzzer does not sound. I’m unsure if this is due to a low sensitivity setting or a manufacturing defect. I would appreciate it if other users could share their experiences.
Worse than expected. Is it really expensive to at least, AT LEAST, activate the hazzard lights in case of an impact?
why are people complaining that 3 stars is bad, it is really not
Yes
On express highways even 5 star cars driving at 90 t0 110 is not safe.
Anything less than 4 is bad.
@@BarkaDog ok boomer
@@BarkaDogyou do know the only cars that get five stars these days are either expensive,large suv's or both right? That is what Ncap whats you to buy,unless youre loaded which this argument is moot.
Wow..Gained 2 Stars after 15 Years of Research & Production..!!
you think they research right after they build one? no. And clearly safety wasn't their goal, not like they were aiming for 5 stars
3
So safety is better than previous one!!
Previous one was selling above 1 lakh every year so this one is going to be a massive hit❤
I had my eye on this model of Swift, these results are bummer.
you can't comapre this result to models that were tested in the past when the tests / ratings were much lesss strict than now
Not necessarily. EURO NCAP raised their standards recently so a comparison with older tests of other models is not possible as they would now score lower too. It is still a very safe car.
@@dominicr4740 Previous mark also had 3 stars and average low score overall.
@@dIsAstErTRPrevious had 4 stars with safety pack and 3 stars without it. It's all about blink blink safety features, not the structure of the car.
Safer than hundai i10 and i20
Fairly safe :)
not really (did worse than a duster)
Duster did better on Child Occupant (80% i believe)
Does the safety feature works on manual as well?
Indian version gonna score a nil.
Bro this Euro ncap this has many tests like lane keep assist collision avoid system but bncap or gncap does not have this kinda safety tests so it is gonna score atleast ATLEAST two to three star which is an slight improvement from the all time worst one star😊😊😊😊
🥚
I can see alot of Tatajeets cribbing over only 3 stars, Tata Bhakto its Euro Standard Ncap not paid Gncap. This car also scored 4 stars in Japan Ncap. First let Tata send a car in any of these and then compare.And lot of them are talking about it's European and not Indian,only features are different for eg ADAS not chasis and structure.
Bruh, the Indian version is entirely different in build. It's manufactured by Maruti. It's so unsafe as it used to be
Base version is tested, indian one have 2 airbags, euro version 6 with adas, aeb. Tata mahindra fanboies are silly.
3 stars are not Bad..
😂😂😂😂😂
That is the european swift....wait for the global ncap test
3 to 5 only injury level more but 120km speed if you hit then you will died in 5 star rating
@@kisan-majdoorkalyansamiti7390yeah but not all, i saw some only 4stars still protect drivers on highway even at 120kmh
@@Bhaidostyaar Bharat NCAP* Global NCAP doesn’t crash test cars for India anymore
What about the body shell integrity? Whether it is stable or unstable?
This why Indians always prefer Tata 😌
Small cars still barely pass the test in 2024? Waiting for some more small cars tests.
Swift is not small car
Swift is a small car
@@technicalkalpraj5653get your eyes checked,this thing is less than 4m long,unless youre comparing this to a Twizy which is just stupid.
So disappointing. I was thinking about trading up to a new Swift. Not anymore.
then buy the Benz they recommend instead of this.
Testing has become harsher and safety standards have risen compared to testing with older Swift.
It's surprises, worse than expected.
Suzuki 3 stars forever
If they didn't keep moving the goalposts, and increasing the best score, we'd have something to compare it with.
As it is, it's TOTALLY irrelevant except for comparison with other cars tested in the very recent past.
its almost like they do that to encourage manufacturers to improve ;)
@@sw20vpif by improve you mean slap more useless ADAS on it then im glad it got three stars.
@@mindfreeze0838 if you don’t like adas systems you can quite easily turn the off 😂
@@sw20vp you havent had want to turn them off have you? They are buried in menus(for the most part Suzuki doesnt do that) and they turn right back on when you start the car again.
@@mindfreeze0838 well with mazda, it’s one button that’s on the side 👍 not very difficult
The European Swift-spec includes additional safety features such as the ADAS suite, which is not present in the version sold in India.
Suzuki and Duster both have some beef with euroncap, they will always receive the lowest ratings 😅
Or maybe they just offer worse active/passive safety lol
In both cases it's all about blink blink safety features, not the structures of the cars.
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers and why Adult Ocupant only got 70% ??!
@@4x4.tests.on.rollers when i see the side impact tests i think car structure is bad too... a car that make of her low weight a focal point, sure need to use less metal reinforce, the impact with the pole reached the inside of the car...
@@stefanomacchi1977 Is it any different from other cars of the same class? If you check the report of pole test - driver is all green.
0:18 airbag passenger so small
構造用接着剤を多用した割には弱いな。特に側面はイマドキヤバい。😢
Suzuki Swift safety is better than Maruti' Swift
Tata would have scored 5 stars
To anyone that was seriously considering buying this car and is not a keyboard warrior ,read the report and buy it. This report is indicative as to why EuroNcap(and all the agencies that follow their testing regime)cannot be trusted to deliver serious useful feedback about the safety potential of any vehicle. Their testing standards now focus more on ADAS and how much it restricts the driver(the more it does that the better) to the absurd such as how well the car does when its underwater. All the extra equipment that would need to be fitted to this car to get that five star rating would push it to be heavier,less fuel efficient ,cost way more and the end goal of all this,less enjoyable to drive. It is no wonder that EuroNcap easily recommends cars which are either not in the same class as this or something that costs three or five times more.Anyone who was seriously looking at this car wouldnt be looking at a Kodiaq or an E Class much less an X2.The utter elitist contempt in the statement from the secretary General of EuroNcap in thier latest press release is the neon sign showing where the organization is now and who they really represent.This organization has become less in tuned with what consumers actually want in a car and instead have gleefully hitched their ideology to that of safety obsessed automatons unconcerned with actual human objective reality. With each new iteration of their testing procedures it is becoming ever more evident that this and other testing agencies really dont want people actually driving cars,but instead have a computer do it for them, at speeds of less than 30kph. Point is ,if youre a serious car buyer,take Euro Ncap's recommendations with a very heavy dose of skepticism .
2020 toyota yaris 5 stars euro ncap, same segment, similar size , similar price , sorry to ruin your day
Source : th-cam.com/video/DDr307KXpKk/w-d-xo.htmlsi=CultWlc5eLI-O4wi
Also want to add this video which is swift euro ncap from 7 years ago with less strict rules than the one with yaris in 2020 and it still didnt manage 5 stars
Source : th-cam.com/video/V1a6DLBhntI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=LY6v8xoSRMk_cdef
@@DancingLight-c7w if youre going to do like for like,the only reason the Yaris scored that five star rating in 2017 was the ADAS because the actual crash results were worse than the Swift's in the test done in 2018. Additionally the Swift was a five star car in 2011 ,when ESC was the most advanced thing being assessed.
Except the kids are seriously injured or dead. The 10yo is rated poor for chest, weak for head, etc.
@@waychillbro the test result comments do not say that. Regardless even if it got the same score as the Yaris it would still be a four star car because of the ADAS,the fact it moved up an entire star with just the addition of some ADAS features says everything.
Safety! It's a toy car in india
In japan get 4 star rating
The safety features in both the Japan and Euro spec are very similar. It’s just that Japan NCAP has less stricter norms, hence making it easier to score higher
Jesus, that sucks
-0 star for Indian version.
Stop exaggerating like a useless foolish hater. It will surely score a minimum of 2-3 stars in india
Salute to Ratan Tata sir
India me na ati ye.😢😢😅
Tata altroz safety
wtf with the pole test... this is plain bad. This crap reached almost the middle of the car at low speed.
But the car scored maximum points in the pole test so the visuals aren't necessarily a guide to the success. Frontal impact is the Swift's weak area.
@@androo4519 yeah I read it afterwards on the report but how? the dummy looks like took a considerable hit, and by the pole's reach, it probably was moved over the shifter and the handbrake. Sure the side airbag should protect the driver but still seems very painful, and at that low speed.
The fact that this car got 3 star in euro ncap while scoring 4 star in jncap is because euro ncap is more tougher than jncap and it is based on strict rules and regulations. While coming to India , it scores only 1 or 0 stars not because of rigid rules in indian crash test . Its only because Suzuki will compromise safety and built quality in India even though it has a more easier regulations. Thats why I always avoid Suzuki cars. The only thing i found here is the partiality and discrimination of Suzuki to Indians. Nowadays most of the Indians won't prefer mileage than their safety and quality.
hmmmmm
Fraquinho
3 stars????👎👎👎👎2024 3 stars???? Totally unacceptable....😮😮😮😮😮
Parents put their kids in cars like this. Sickening.
tell those parents to buy the Benz EuroNcap is recommending they buy instead of this then.
This is unacceptable.
Not acceptable score in this day and age.
Mark my words ,Indian one is gonna score zero.
Dangerous car due to its small dimensions
Haha no. The large cars are the dangerous part. Grow up.
SHUT UP
Small doesn’t equate to unsafe or safe. The engineering is everything and also the raised standards of EURO NCAP impact here. Comparison with other cars tested over the last few years is not possible due to changes. They need to rescore all current model tests to match the new standards.
@@MaticTheProto ok dude. Then , unsafe car
The tata altroz is also small yet it has 5 stars buddy
丰田神话破灭