"How's the game?" "The game is bugged beyond belief" Yeah coder, but how can you make sure they were talking about the DB game and not yugioh in general?
"Darkness Approaches" a monster into a face-down attack position? Only being able to have 3 of Harpie Lady #1, #2, or #3 in your deck max because they all count as the same name? BAs not blowing themselves up because of "Fiendish Rhino Warrior"? Yup, convoluted and dumbfounding is pretty much the cornerstone of YGO
I think that glitched game was a Shadow Duel, and no one was supposed to see it until there was but only one victor.... Trust me, it happened when yugi dueled pepegaSus.
Hey Coder, just wanted to let you know that, as a mathematician myself, I can in fact confirm for you that 2 > 1. Crazy stuff, I know, but you really do learn these things in grad school!
I LOVE how as soon as you get to the glitched game it starts playing lavender town. Fantastic editing! I always get a laugh out of these highlight even tho I watch all the streams
I cannot believe that Yuga proved that not only Yugioh players do not read cards but even Konami does not read cards and just translates thus we get some weird mistranslations from time to time. Wow.
@@xCorvus7x So after watching the clip 2 to three times the key part is when he Google translates. Droplet is legal because it can be activated from hand, however its effect is nullified. You cannot activate cards set on the field against Yuga, however you can activate cards from hand they are just negated. The issue is either the card on DB or in general is poorly translated from the original. The translation makes it seem like you cannot activate any cards that touch the field period, which would lock you out of droplet or imperm or DRNM etc. Edit: wow I just checked masterduelmeta and it has the same mistranslation, I wonder if it works like it's supposed to or not, interesting
Coder, I need you to know, that Witchcrafter simping was the entire reason I looked into the archtype and it's now my favorite thing to play. Thank you so much for introducing me to my new favorite deck.
The def mode gazelle thing genuinely is part of why DB is just not for me. The fact you can call a judge for things like this and actually be told you're right is bullshit.
Honestly im very happy to be subscribed to coder he's knows so much about the game and a extremely very good judge very humble and very chill and funny as well I'm happy we have someone like him in our community ❤️
Something similar happened to me where one time I was going to a singles duel in rated but then my boyfriend hopped online and we just decided to play together so I quit rating before finding another player but somehow in the middle of my duel with my boyfriend I got put in the rated game chat but I stayed in the duel with my boyfriend and I had no way to get out of the chat I was so confused trying to ask a judge about it and even showed proof but he was incredibly hostile for no reason luckily the duel was canceled and resolved but it was an interesting experience
I have a good question on a ruling,I play flundereeze and on my opponents turn I manage to tribute summon earthbound immortal rasca can I shuffle itself into the deck to make my opponent discard there card from hand? There's also a field spell on field when I do this it states target 1-3 cards I control and shuffle them into the deck then your opponent discards the amount I shuffled afterwords it gains atk equal to the amount of discards by 1000 each.
With the Cali yuga thing, you activate the spell or trap from your hand which is why you droplets was legal from your hand to the field, it'll just be negated no matter what. I don't see why you say it is worded weirdly, I'm not s judge and I understood his effect
Its wording is confusing, as saying you can activate Spell cards from your hand by placing them on the field but they are negated anyway, when you can't activate the ones that are already on the field, seems pretty weird to me. Usually a card would either negate the effects or prevent the activations, but not a mix of both. Basically the card only having the second part of the effect would in practice be almost always identical (except that you would be able to pay costs), and it would be less confusing. Also, to me Spell cards activated from your hand should be considered to activate on the field, it would make more sense imo, and would make this kind of situation simpler (but that's another debate I guess) . And you could also say that when you get Kali Yuga'd you can also just conceed without trying to understand the subtleties of the card, that would be a point
Pretty sure most cards are not written like that and instead say "cards and effects cannot be activated". This situation it should really say "other cards already on the field, and their effects cannot be activated" so that's why droplet was legal and just gets negated
@@illusion6559 The negation part is to cover things like Cerulean Skyfire which have non-activated effects that Yuga would still block(yes, Skyfire's Negate is non-activated), the activation part is easy enough, it means you're still allowed GY and Hand activations, playing spells onto the field is just a weird case where the activation location is considered hand Its a bit of a weird wording that relies on the idea that a card activates in hand because you declare it while its in hand before its placed on the field so its not the greatest wording
I have a serious question @distantcoder. Can the drytron ritual card tribute face down monsters? It can't check its level or its type. In addition if it checked in the graveyard then even if you resolved its other effect to return it to the hand then you could always tribute for 2000. Plz help, this is all regarding book of moon's implication in the current and upcoming format
Card in question "When a card is activated on the field" droplets "this card may be activated from the hand" meaning not on the field when activated it's a handtrap with no monster attached and theirs like only a handful that ever get played
DB Is online no? I help dev for a oracle software, and Chromes latest update broke the text boxes as well for our program. Methinks google fucked something up and its starting to show up now.
Yeah after watching the whole video, its definitely chrome. Its moreso when something is trying to open up a mini window on the screen, which causes it to disappear but the data is sill there. Only way to fix without going into (pun) CODING, is to leave the box and re-open it to see if the code for it loads through properly
I went to an event when Cyber Harpie Lady was first released. We had to make a deck from packs provided. Someone who I was playing ran out of cards in their deck, I said good game, they grabbed their side deck, and put it in their deck zone. When I asked what he was doing, he said he ran out of cards so he can now use his side deck as his deck. 🤦
I'm not gonna lie, if someone asked me if 700 > 750, Konami would have to relieve me of my judging license. In the hypothetical world I had one, of course
Ik yuga is worded badly but I thought everyone knew that spells literally need to hit the field to resolve their effects... Yes you activate from hand but the effect needs to resolve in a zone. Which is on field.
With ddd king kali u can indeed still activate cards from hand still. But their effects are negated on field and basically it gets wasted. Its funny in master duel when they LS or Rageki and it's just a waste after Kali yuga
Hey Coder, not sure you will read this after such a long time after uploading the vid but the last 2 sections/ chapters of this video have some rly weird titles like mmo final fantasy XIV highlight
I love Kali Yuga, Konami ban this card already so I can look at it fondly on the banlist as a memory instead of it ruining my opponent's duels & making me feel bad.
nooo now tat you looked at the japanese translation where it said magic card wizards will sue konami for copyright infringement again. that was hidden knowledge to never get public.
Hold on, can we get a ruling video on that kali yuga thing coz Ive always thought you cant activate things in general? You can still activate from hand? Like what? It also doesnt activate so how could you chain a droplet?
Based on how the card reads "other cards and their effects cannot be activated on the field, and other cards' effects on the field are negated." So you cannot activate a card or effect from the field, e.g. set spell/traps, or the effect of a face-up monster or continuous spell/trap. Also, the effects of all cards on the field other than kali are negated, meaning any continuous effects (such as "This card can attack directly." and "Cannot be targeted by your opponent's card effects.") are also negated. Because Kali only prevents the activations of cards/ effects on the field, you _can_ activate a spell _from your hand_ , however when a spell card is activated from the hand, it's placed on to the field into one of the spell/trap zones as part of that action; The spell *activates* from the hand, but *resolves* on the field, as such it can be legally activated but the effect will be negated as it is on the field by the time the effect would resolve and is subject to Kali's effect of "other cards' effects on the field are negated." This remains true for handtrap traps like Evenly Matched & Imperm, as they are placed into a spell/trap zone when activated from the hand. So basically, as long as it activates in a position off the field, you can use it, and as long as it doesn't get moved on to the field in the process of activating it, it can resolve, seems to be the broad strokes of that effect.
I saw the last guy had typed "the monster is in def" before getting off the screen, like what the hell does it have to do with anything they don't lose like half their strength when their in defense position
Kali Yuga is such a dumb card tbh. But I can see why Droplet is legal from the hand - the intention is cards already on the field can't be flipped or properly resolved.
Imagine reading a card and the effect having a different ruling than what common sense might mean. Main reason I don't actually play the RL card game. So convoluted and more complicated than effects need to be
@@cephalosjr.1835 Well now you've proven it for the surreal numbers 1 and 2 (which indeed is fascinating), but can you do it from nothing but the Peano-Axioms?
![일상 속 기분 좋음 [Proto disco meme]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DwmEIaZ7XGQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Props to the editor. The lavender town bit was great. 100/12 would spook again.
Perfect response to this weird glitch
"How's the game?"
"The game is bugged beyond belief"
Yeah coder, but how can you make sure they were talking about the DB game and not yugioh in general?
Well the answer is still valid
"Darkness Approaches" a monster into a face-down attack position? Only being able to have 3 of Harpie Lady #1, #2, or #3 in your deck max because they all count as the same name? BAs not blowing themselves up because of "Fiendish Rhino Warrior"?
Yup, convoluted and dumbfounding is pretty much the cornerstone of YGO
I think that glitched game was a Shadow Duel, and no one was supposed to see it until there was but only one victor....
Trust me, it happened when yugi dueled pepegaSus.
you just took this to the next level
PepegaSUS xDD AHAHAHAHHAHA XDD
I know the side decking is a "haha just move the cards xd" but most people actually don't know how to build a side deck or what cards to side out/in.
The side decking video was more on the maths of side decking and things you shouldn't do but can legally do
Hey Coder, just wanted to let you know that, as a mathematician myself, I can in fact confirm for you that 2 > 1. Crazy stuff, I know, but you really do learn these things in grad school!
dam i see math is used in real life dam suppose i've been lying to myself all these years.
_insert the proof from Russel's Principia Mathematica_
I LOVE how as soon as you get to the glitched game it starts playing lavender town. Fantastic editing! I always get a laugh out of these highlight even tho I watch all the streams
Pot of Desires banished the duel face down
I cannot believe that Yuga proved that not only Yugioh players do not read cards but even Konami does not read cards and just translates thus we get some weird mistranslations from time to time. Wow.
Mekk-knight Avram was already proof that they don't actually read the cards
Check THIS out
I’m trying to figure that out still. Why did he say that the card says the exact opposite of what it does? How does that make sense on his part?
Where's the mistranslation?
Does the Yuga version in Dueling Book not say on the field?
@@xCorvus7x So after watching the clip 2 to three times the key part is when he Google translates. Droplet is legal because it can be activated from hand, however its effect is nullified. You cannot activate cards set on the field against Yuga, however you can activate cards from hand they are just negated. The issue is either the card on DB or in general is poorly translated from the original. The translation makes it seem like you cannot activate any cards that touch the field period, which would lock you out of droplet or imperm or DRNM etc.
Edit: wow I just checked masterduelmeta and it has the same mistranslation, I wonder if it works like it's supposed to or not, interesting
It's bad enough that Yugioh players can't read, you telling me we can't math as well? What do they teach at dueling school?
How to shark
How to just do this and do that.
Normal summon Alistair
Dueling and alchemy (apparently mostly alchemy)
@@MysticCouchPotato Can confirm, I just finished creating a Philosopher's Stone in preparation for my next YCS.
14:14 The new Gawr Gura is looking good.
Coder, I need you to know, that Witchcrafter simping was the entire reason I looked into the archtype and it's now my favorite thing to play. Thank you so much for introducing me to my new favorite deck.
3 min to summon Levi has me cracking tf up lmao
The def mode gazelle thing genuinely is part of why DB is just not for me.
The fact you can call a judge for things like this and actually be told you're right is bullshit.
That side board video is actually pretty good. Quality content
Lmfao when you went off on GGYGO video on how to sideboard I lost it. He makes good content lol
Yuga says "on the field" droplet is in hand and can therefore be activated since it is not on the field, of course once on the field it is negated.
I pulled Genni in a pack and had basically the same reaction. Built witchcrafters immediately after
Honestly im very happy to be subscribed to coder he's knows so much about the game and a extremely very good judge very humble and very chill and funny as well I'm happy we have someone like him in our community ❤️
Last question makes me think the person recently came from MtG.
6:21 Coder's special Halloween OVA looks great.
Something similar happened to me where one time I was going to a singles duel in rated but then my boyfriend hopped online and we just decided to play together so I quit rating before finding another player but somehow in the middle of my duel with my boyfriend I got put in the rated game chat but I stayed in the duel with my boyfriend and I had no way to get out of the chat I was so confused trying to ask a judge about it and even showed proof but he was incredibly hostile for no reason luckily the duel was canceled and resolved but it was an interesting experience
I love this series
Just binged the early episodes.
Love it more.
"I'm wearing crocks, OK!?" what a statement xd
I have a good question on a ruling,I play flundereeze and on my opponents turn I manage to tribute summon earthbound immortal rasca can I shuffle itself into the deck to make my opponent discard there card from hand? There's also a field spell on field when I do this it states target 1-3 cards I control and shuffle them into the deck then your opponent discards the amount I shuffled afterwords it gains atk equal to the amount of discards by 1000 each.
With the Cali yuga thing, you activate the spell or trap from your hand which is why you droplets was legal from your hand to the field, it'll just be negated no matter what. I don't see why you say it is worded weirdly, I'm not s judge and I understood his effect
Its wording is confusing, as saying you can activate Spell cards from your hand by placing them on the field but they are negated anyway, when you can't activate the ones that are already on the field, seems pretty weird to me. Usually a card would either negate the effects or prevent the activations, but not a mix of both. Basically the card only having the second part of the effect would in practice be almost always identical (except that you would be able to pay costs), and it would be less confusing. Also, to me Spell cards activated from your hand should be considered to activate on the field, it would make more sense imo, and would make this kind of situation simpler (but that's another debate I guess) .
And you could also say that when you get Kali Yuga'd you can also just conceed without trying to understand the subtleties of the card, that would be a point
Pretty sure most cards are not written like that and instead say "cards and effects cannot be activated". This situation it should really say "other cards already on the field, and their effects cannot be activated" so that's why droplet was legal and just gets negated
I think technically, you can activate a spell card from your hand, which places it on the field and is treated as activated on the field.
@@illusion6559 The negation part is to cover things like Cerulean Skyfire which have non-activated effects that Yuga would still block(yes, Skyfire's Negate is non-activated), the activation part is easy enough, it means you're still allowed GY and Hand activations, playing spells onto the field is just a weird case where the activation location is considered hand
Its a bit of a weird wording that relies on the idea that a card activates in hand because you declare it while its in hand before its placed on the field so its not the greatest wording
5:49 childhood flashback warning
That match with the glitch is cursed even the music agrees
Cant wait for the 20min call from stream yesterday to be a video lol
Hey if I got a rullings question wile I'm just brain storming a deck could I just shoot u a message if your on at the time?
Distant Coder be like Seto Kaiba hacking into the mainframe 🤣 9:12
Bro. NV deserves some love for getting one up on the Judge god
I have a serious question @distantcoder. Can the drytron ritual card tribute face down monsters? It can't check its level or its type. In addition if it checked in the graveyard then even if you resolved its other effect to return it to the hand then you could always tribute for 2000. Plz help, this is all regarding book of moon's implication in the current and upcoming format
Oh hey 2:58 its slimefish, this dude is always annoying as hell, I enjoy fighting him and beating him cause he gets so pissed
Hey coder, what do you think about Sora in Smash bros?
14:15 you hear the judge taking your call is a streamer, so you go check out his channel and you see this:
To this day, I still use "imagine reading"
My internet messed up at like 12 seconds and for a second I thought it was part of the bit
Card in question "When a card is activated on the field" droplets "this card may be activated from the hand" meaning not on the field when activated it's a handtrap with no monster attached and theirs like only a handful that ever get played
Blue „You are slow playing“
Red „No“
„This is a abuse for me“
DB Is online no? I help dev for a oracle software, and Chromes latest update broke the text boxes as well for our program. Methinks google fucked something up and its starting to show up now.
Yeah after watching the whole video, its definitely chrome. Its moreso when something is trying to open up a mini window on the screen, which causes it to disappear but the data is sill there. Only way to fix without going into (pun) CODING, is to leave the box and re-open it to see if the code for it loads through properly
That bugged game omegalul. Its like VFD Irl
That playmat slaps so hard.
That mat is sick!
I went to an event when Cyber Harpie Lady was first released. We had to make a deck from packs provided. Someone who I was playing ran out of cards in their deck, I said good game, they grabbed their side deck, and put it in their deck zone. When I asked what he was doing, he said he ran out of cards so he can now use his side deck as his deck. 🤦
Is that because your activating it in hard but it's resolving on field?
Since your a judge maybe you can answer my question. Why does maiden with eyes of blue get to flip back up from book of moons effect.
I'm not gonna lie, if someone asked me if 700 > 750, Konami would have to relieve me of my judging license. In the hypothetical world I had one, of course
Ik yuga is worded badly but I thought everyone knew that spells literally need to hit the field to resolve their effects... Yes you activate from hand but the effect needs to resolve in a zone. Which is on field.
Most normal Duelingbook glitch:
With ddd king kali u can indeed still activate cards from hand still.
But their effects are negated on field and basically it gets wasted.
Its funny in master duel when they LS or Rageki and it's just a waste after Kali yuga
5:58 perfect music
Coder I love your videos bro! There so good! Keep it up!
Hey cool I am in the video playing Performapal Longphone Bull!!
one eye open when i'm sleeping
What was that call???? How was there no chat box???? Love these highlight videos since I can't always hop in the stream chat
Hey Coder, not sure you will read this after such a long time after uploading the vid but the last 2 sections/ chapters of this video have some rly weird titles like mmo final fantasy XIV highlight
I love Kali Yuga, Konami ban this card already so I can look at it fondly on the banlist as a memory instead of it ruining my opponent's duels & making me feel bad.
nooo now tat you looked at the japanese translation where it said magic card wizards will sue konami for copyright infringement again. that was hidden knowledge to never get public.
No cap that’s a dope ass toon mat
Damn, it’s rough being a judge out here nowadays.
Kali isn’t that weird though? It’s obviously talking about like resort or jackal, not normal spells
Hold on, can we get a ruling video on that kali yuga thing coz Ive always thought you cant activate things in general? You can still activate from hand? Like what? It also doesnt activate so how could you chain a droplet?
Based on how the card reads
"other cards and their effects cannot be activated on the field, and other cards' effects on the field are negated."
So you cannot activate a card or effect from the field, e.g. set spell/traps, or the effect of a face-up monster or continuous spell/trap. Also, the effects of all cards on the field other than kali are negated, meaning any continuous effects (such as "This card can attack directly." and "Cannot be targeted by your opponent's card effects.") are also negated.
Because Kali only prevents the activations of cards/ effects on the field, you _can_ activate a spell _from your hand_ , however when a spell card is activated from the hand, it's placed on to the field into one of the spell/trap zones as part of that action; The spell *activates* from the hand, but *resolves* on the field, as such it can be legally activated but the effect will be negated as it is on the field by the time the effect would resolve and is subject to Kali's effect of "other cards' effects on the field are negated." This remains true for handtrap traps like Evenly Matched & Imperm, as they are placed into a spell/trap zone when activated from the hand.
So basically, as long as it activates in a position off the field, you can use it, and as long as it doesn't get moved on to the field in the process of activating it, it can resolve, seems to be the broad strokes of that effect.
@@snowboundwhale6860 but droplet doesnt activate in hand, so how did droplet negate kali?
@@luckyilagged2424 If it was already set on the field and chained to Kali's summon, yeah that shouldn't work far as I can tell.
@@snowboundwhale6860 Spells absolutely do not activate in the hand. Kali Yuga is just a wording mess.
14:15 GWAR GURA?
If kali yuga can't be negated, then why can neo galaxy-eyes photon dragon get negated, if it is summoned with photon dragon as material ?
I saw the last guy had typed "the monster is in def" before getting off the screen, like what the hell does it have to do with anything they don't lose like half their strength when their in defense position
Watching the anime helps understanding kali yuga (i guess)
You need some dynamic compression my man XD
Kali Yuga is such a dumb card tbh. But I can see why Droplet is legal from the hand - the intention is cards already on the field can't be flipped or properly resolved.
That glitch happens a lot on db, nothing loads
Kali Yuga op, been playing it in pends as ez to make rusty and a no material r7 :’) go first win game, go second use acces code combos to otk
I shit you not I've had this bug where I learned at the end I'd been in 2 duels at the same time
Well 2 might be bigger than 1 but is 700 bigger than 750?
WHEN KALI YUGA HITS THE FIELD!KALI YUGA TURBO BEST DECK
That Kali Yuga ruling is kind of sus when it mentions magic cards instead of spells. Is that the most recent ruling?
Bruh didn't you see he pulled the ruling in Japanese and jammed it in Google translate?
14:00 A
Imagine reading a card and the effect having a different ruling than what common sense might mean. Main reason I don't actually play the RL card game. So convoluted and more complicated than effects need to be
Simulators at least usually get the rulings correct and you save so much money. Win-Win
I’m wearing crocs
So 2 is bigger than 1 but is it smaller than 3?
😂😂😂 Kali yuga OP
Toon matt is nice.. Yes I too like tome
YuGiOh, the one game where reading the card does not explain the card.
How does he put up with these people? 😂
I never know that Gazelle is female 14:21
sounds like the guy mains salad so hard hes going to marry it literally
I have no chat and I must judge
The last clip gave me terminal aids
Yo Coder, you're saying 2 > 1, but can you mathematically prove that 2 > 1?
Yeah, watch this:
The most basic form of the surreal numbers 1 and 2 is as follows: 1={0|}, 2={1|}.
Is 1
@@cephalosjr.1835 Well now you've proven it for the surreal numbers 1 and 2 (which indeed is fascinating), but can you do it from nothing but the Peano-Axioms?
It looks like you’ve never read Go DDD divine zero king rage, looks like you are not the true rulings master
Tome = time
11 likes 3 views LETS GOOO TH-cam
Tbh Genni is the hottest one
xD
🐔👍