@@TimJohnston911 now our days people's do that, is call procrastination, the world is full of knowledge and there is still lots of things the we haven't even discovered yet, it comes down to the person and how lazy that person is, with an extended life span there is so much to learn the it will require eons to learn all of it, so no, I don't think 1,000 years to live is enough.
Just a point to the average 35 years lifetime they had in ancient times... it was heavily skewed by the fact that they had huge child mortality rates. If you don't take into account the deaths at early age, the average life expectancy in the XIX century was around 55, not 35.
The reasons she gives (vaccines, germ theory, and antibiotics) are largely responsible for the drop in childhood mortality rates. Sooo... that's kind of the point.
The myth of dying at 35 needs to die -- at 35, I suppose. Every time I hear someone throw out this false fact it causes me to doubt everything they say after.
Indeed. Anything that could kill you at 21, still can... So, continue to wear your seat belt, know where emergency exists are, avoid homicidal people, wear your construction / motorcycle / sports helmet, listen to the light attendant's safety talk, avoid war zones (though some things may be worth that risk), know first aid (the life you save may be your own), look both ways before crossing streets (yes, like they told you in grade school), consider cryonics, wear your life jacket in small boats, install smoke detectors, etc... (Although related rejuvenation technology will also let you recover from some traumatic accidents and mayhem that would finish you off, today. At the very least, try to keep your brain intact. Anything else, we may eventually be able to restore...)
@@stardolphin2 After 31 concussions, I mostly concur. Your brain is your most important resource. My only disagreement is with modern seatbelts as they jar your brain so suddenly (namely the shoulder belt) as it stops the head too quickly. They need to be engineered for a more gradual stop. Btw, not wearing my seatbelt has saved my life twice. I’m not advocating for not wearing a seatbelt but there are certain accidents where it will kill you.
I'm 30 & I already planned for my 120 years long life play which are as follows: Eat only twice a day around 10AM & 7PM, Take vitamin c rich foods, Walk barefoot beside roads & public places, Observe Sun light, rain water, breath natural fresh air from trees, drink copper rich water enjoy sky view sleeps, etc.....
I agree with the goal of extending the "quality of life" years, even if doesn't extend lifespan. This would make life more active and enjoyable for seniors while simultaneously reducing age-related medical costs and the often-extreme costs of end-of-life care that barely extends "existence". This starts with diet, fitness and other self-care, but there is a place for medicine as well, if it can be shown to be both safe and effective.
i'm on the darker end of this spectrum: i believe if people aren't doing too good, and wanna avoid draining more resources, they should have the option of assisted suicide. we can debate what requirements are necessary, what type of mental health certification is needed, how to legally notify closest next of kins, etc. some european countries have already had legal euthanasia for a while now, so we do have case studies to look at as well.
I think it's rather depressing that the only benefit you see in extending life is on reduced costs and money. Those would become even less of an issue if we just didn't age at all and lived longer.
@@reenusharma5156 I don't know haha but she just stays laid in the bed and her mind is gone all she speaks doesn't make any sense most part of the time, and she sleeps a lot. She is just there alive waiting for the day to come.
@@reenusharma5156 oh no idea bruh, we come from a poor family so she might have some hard time. I think she had a sister that also reached old age like 97 or so. Could be genetics.
No smoking, no drinking, no drugs no partying late, salt, sugar, fats, carbs, fun... No Thanks. You are not even guarantied that you won't get hit by a bus, some new virus other random event. If life has no flavor it's not worth living longer it will just seem like it till your boring end when you die like a bird in some box were they stuff the elderly without care. Live till you die. Memento mori ! Amor Fati !
@@1ManNamedDansalt rock salt is good not iodized salt because iodized salt is synthetic this chemical.. Consume rock salt and ads water 2 liter water because is healthy blood
The whole idea of people not wanting to live longer is that very few /healthy/ people ever say that they would choose to die now. So, if healthspan increases, there is a decent chance people will still not want to 'live forever' but will be perfectly fine living well into triple digits.
People just can't grasp the concept, kinda like if you forced a kid to decide their own future for the next 60 years. They'd make horrible decisions. Same thing here - we can't ask people whether this is a good idea, they aren't capable of answering. No offense, but I've heard so many analogues to "I will be a president" when people talk about biological immortality.
I am 59 I think I already lived long enough. Who will want to live longer? How boring same bs every single day . Been there done that. Can you imagine if a bad person or a criminal also got to live longer? How fun more poop from that nasty person on this beautiful earth 🌍.
@@elbacar4838 But that's just because you can't imagine how the world is going to change very soon. Sure, being 30 for 100 years during a static industrial age might end up being boring, but we live in a time where so many windows into completely different and amazing possibilities open. If you are an "Earth type", you might want to hang on for Solar system colonization which is right behind the corner. And if you can deal with or learn to deal with digital technologies, VR will enable you to experience things no one can even dream of yet. You will not be able to become bored, because there will be so much to experience you won't even be able to hold it all in your memory - ever read a book again, after many years, and it felt like reading it for the first time? Maybe even better, because of nostalgia and vague familiarity. That will apply here too. You might literally lead individual "lives" one after another, either sandboxed where you can do whatever you want in a completely different environment, or a lifespan-analogue of todays movies for a directed experience. And finally, with deep-learning, computers can study your reactions and present you content you are bound to enjoy. Not just eternal bliss - which would get boring - it will determine what level of frustration and what amount of obstacles you enjoy to overcome while doing things. It will make you happy, whatever that means at the moment. Basically, we are constructing a Heaven here.
I just hope that if they're going to extend life, they're going to have a major campaign to slow birth rates. Because this planet isn't getting any bigger. And with climate change, basic necessities like water, food and space to live and grow that food are going to be more limited.
@@Eldorado1239 ya, I'd hang on until it seemed like life was no longer making progress in any way because I'm way too curious about the future and how far we really can go right now. And once I decided I've had enough, I'd just let old and grab me and live out those years until the inevitable. I could not imagine assisted suicide honestly. The choice of death is not as easy to make as choosing to live. I'd rather have no choice at all when it comes. That way, I can at least make peace with the natural order.
Life expectancy was so low because infant and child mortality was insanely high, not because people died in their 30's. If you made it past childhood, you could expect to live to see your 60's or 70's. It's not that people were dying at 35, it's that all the people dying in childhood and infancy dragged the overall expectancy way down.
Not true. Yes, higher infant mortality contributed to lower average life expectancies. But before the widespread deployment of vaccines and antibiotics, many people were also dying early from infectious diseases that have now been virtually eliminated by vaccines, and simple infections that are now easily cured with antibiotics. When Social Security started in 1935, 62 was chosen as the age to start collecting benefits because the average life expectancy was only 58. Most people would not live long enough to collect benefits. That had nothing to do with infant mortality.
I'm 50 and trying to start over but I feel like I'm too old for it. If I knew I had a lot longer to lead a healthy energetic life I'd be much more motivated and happy.
I think it is a reference to people acting and dressing younger. I thinking eating and health may be a bit healthier, yet obesity is a really big problem. So, I don't know ..I guess it is a state of mind.
@@Supremepikachu Is this a serious question? If yes, then it means that the way people perceive 50 year olds today is how they perceived 40 year olds some years ago.
I didn't start seriously taking care of myself until I retired at 62. Now, at 66, I've spent four years correcting that and I'm in better shape than I was in my thirties - by a lot. I've dropped 50 pounds, work out 5 days a week, take a handful of nutraceuticals (including a senolytic) and follow the longevity research for new ideas. Don't wait for perfection (paralysis by analysis) just start with what we know, diet and exercise, knowing that will add 10 healthy years right now.
I've seen some studies talk about how intermittent fasting and fasting in general can help rid ourselves of some if the cells that are involved in aging
I also believe intermittent fasting.in my country among buddhist monks live nearly 100 years or more than 95 years. They take only breakfast and lunch before 11.30 after that they take only water or some light fruit drinks. They allow to break the fast next day morning 7am
If we can live longer lots of the thoughts expressed by the people in this video will change. People will care more about the environment and resources, people that live longer will be willing to learn new trades. We should all live longer, not just the wealthy will benefit from the medical advances, poor people will be included in the ability to live long also.
If for they'd ever come up with some miracle cure for aging and letting humans live for a very, very long time it'll be only for the filthy rich believe me. When I say filthy rich I mean the very top of the top. Our society would turn into a sci-fi movie. I can't remember the name of it but that's *exactly* how I'd imagine it to be. People are very selfish and greedy and this will not change anytime soon. I don't understand a "fulfilled" life? It seems very different depending on who you ask and something you can't generalize.
@ Chris Stearns No they won't, only if it's proven and people actually do live twenty more years. They'll be absorbed in staying alive. Their thoughts won't much surpass their previous involvements and monies. Energy may be greater but not by much especially if they are single seniors. They will be ecstatic to make it to the laundry room by themselves. Go to your local senior living buildings and observe the seniors living there. What you say may be true but not until it's proven and living twenty more years is factual.
Someone else in the comment section wrote something so good: “ Matt Alex 12 days ago If you're pain stricken by grief about losing a loved one,the best way to give a tribute to the person, is to not die.”
We really need to stop exaggerating past life expectancy figures when discussing people already here and able to comprehend videos such as this. In 1841, beating infant mortality added about 7 years, and beating early childhood mortality on top of that (age 5) added another 7 (14 total) years. Yes it makes a great Family Guy cutaway picturing peasant farmers who died en masse in their 30s, but that's just not really how it worked.
Exactly. It just sounds so good on paper. Generally speaking it was a harder growing up but once you were past that you could actually live for quite a while, just like today even without medicine. Some people are just extremely sturdy while others are not. Just look at the covid situation that popped up. Nothing says that won't happen again but next time we might not be as "lucky". It should have been a real eye opener. Just imagine some really nasty virus that takes a month to kick in. It would have spread across the globe like a wildfire before anyone even realized what happened.
Not true about being not hired. I was hired as an engineer at 50 yrs old and worked for another 15 years before I retired pretty comfortably. Never give up, work as much as you want.
You gave me hope I’m 38 and working in aerospace as an electrical engineer. I started off as a tech, but hopefully within a few months I’ll get that promotion to engineer. I graduated in December 2022.
@@MarioRodriguez-gr8wc There is a great need for engineers. People are not choosing to become engineers as much as they used to... it is a hard to get through the education. Most people don't have what it takes... I am sure you will have a great career all of your life and work as long as you want :) Be sure to put yourself on LinkedIn, and always keep your options open, and continue to learn and gain experience .
I wondered why that was left out of the discussion, it is extremely inexpensive and available to everyone who chooses to restrict caloric intake and use in little self control, where in,I fear lies the answer.
@@Elias12 I just want to die looking young. I don't care about living much longer. The idea of living old weak and miserable for 50+ years is what worries me.
The planet doesn't suffer from limited resources. We can already feed about 10 billion people, which is about what the human population is expected to peak at (would be even less if poor countries got richer faster). The problem is supply chains and valuation of money over life.
We could sustain 100 billion people but we would all be forced to live in pods and suck bio fluid out of our neo-corporate overlord mandated happy bottles
Anyone arguing that ageing and death is a good thing is just... I have no words to adequately describe how abhorrent that view is. It's like if you argued that premodern infant mortality levels were morally good and should have been preserved. We're so used to being condemned to the horror of our own mortality that we rationalize it as a good thing to make facing it easier, but it is a disease, and those wanting to block us from developing a cure are evil beyond words. The fact that improving human life would result in additional challenges is an argument to address those challenges and their underlying causes, not deny making lives better.
Isn't the real issue here those who get to live a better life... and the rest who don't? We as a race have so many hurdles to cross before we're truly ready for the next step. We're nowhere near that.
@@huldu sounds like chicken and egg situation to me. Which needs to come first? Perhaps better longevity will be a catalyst for an economic and / or societal paradigm shift. Rather than wait for the shift before looking into better longevity. Better longevity would reduce the economic strain on health care as well as a greying society and pension funds.
Did a life expectancy of 35 meant that people dropped dead at 36 years old, or that the huge amount of children's deaths lowered the number? History is full of individuals that lived more than 35 years old. On the other hand, about the mice in the experiment, if they were younger and healthier, what they died of? Were they killed or became cancerous all over?
All the papers I have read so far that "de-aged" mice had them die of cancer. Clearing out senescence cells, injecting Stem cells, Activating telomerase,... All leads to massive amounts of cancer. Then again mice and especially lab mice are very very cancer prone to begin with
Agreed, here is some more info on that very subject. There is a an often overlooked distinction between life expectancy and life span. Life expectancy is an average. If you have two children, and one díes before their first birthday but the other lives to the age of 70, their average life expectancy is 35. Which is in fact the problem when discussing “ancient” times, the high ínfant mortalíty rate that is (and young chíldren dęath rate was also high). Back in 1994 a study looked at every man entered into the Oxford Classical Dictionary who lived in ancient Greece or Rome. Their ages of dęath were compared to men listed in the more recent Chambers Biographical Dictionary. Of 397 ancients in total, 99 díed víolently. Of the remaining 298, those born before 100BC lived to a median age of 72 years. Those born after 100BC lived to a median age of 66. (The authors speculate that the introduction and prevalence of dangerøus lead plumbing may have led to this apparent shortening of life).
Good questions. Have to always be suspicious of statistics because they can be manipulated so many ways. If a baby dies at birth & someone else lives to 100, the stats for their life expectancy would be 50 years old - so like the vid says, at present the best answer is: no matter what age you are, exercise, eat smart, and sleep well.
"But will living longer make us happier?" Perhaps we need to ask this question as if we're the first generation that actually gets to answer it, instead of retell the stories of those before us who had to comfort themselves for having little choice in the matter. What society has actually had healthspans or lifespans far beyond ours? This is uncharted territory, and more than ever before, it's what we make of it.
The idea that other societies were rationalizing their lack of access to immortality is not very well founded. Societies have always envisioned better worlds than the ones they had, why would they suddenly make an exception for lifespans?
It’s possible that once we die we realize things are much better than they were when we were living in this world. See Bob Schneider’s song “I’m Good Now.”
I think the "change in society" would have come from family/housing: The construction for multi-generational homes. One of the biggest issues is housing. What if people, if they are living longer and healthier, had three generations per-house hold. They could generate more wealth, as a family, to buy a house to accommodate more than a dozen members. Constructed as an "open" duplex. Meaning the house starts by allowing a family of 4 and an older couple to live. People might actually get more out of an upbringing with parents and grandparents around. Passing on of knowledge (life lessons) and generational wealth. Imagine a house that has two kitchens two "master bedrooms" but one side has two extra rooms for offspring. U-shaped with a central "court yard" for gardening (food). These rooms would be smaller than what we have nowadays. Think more along the lines master being your kid's room and kids room being half that to simply accommodate sleep and necessities.....
I think we overthink the happiness element in life extension. It should be living in a satisfactory way. That means financially safe. That also means complete health care. This allows happiness to occur from doing things you like and the opportunity to explore new ventures. Without financial safety and complete health care, extended longevity can become a bitter almost surf-like existence where people live from day to day paying corporate to live longer.
I'm surprised to see this topic starting to become so widespread that PBS covered it recently. I still think of the longevity space as an underground hobby.
If you can extend your health span throughout old age, then you have already won a great deal of quality of life. If you are also not geneticly predisposed to certain diseases, then your chances are good to live a long and healthy life. All you need, is a healthy diet (fruits, veggies, little or no alcohol), regular physical activity, such as cycling, jogging, swimming, etc., regular good nights sleep and friends to spend your time with. But you also need a stable income in order to live a good and healthy life. For many people, this will be just as much of a key issue as leading a healthy lifestyle.
Hi, FYI - The biggest problem for the whole of humanity is developing Maturity. There really are only two possible outcomes... 1). A maniac becomes world dictator, and destroys mankind. 2). A golden age, where people actually mature, become wise, and live incredibly long lives Serving each other, for everyone's benefit.
I have been an endurance athlete most of my life, the physical capacity I had at 25 I still have at 71 because of a daily training routine. I also never get sick so is strenuous exercise the key to feeling young? Yes, I believe that is true.
I’ve been unwell for a good few years & gained so much weight it’s unreal. I’m thinking the fasting might be the way to go first since I have a lot of weight to lose plus some light exercise since my weight is limiting my activity atm. Then hopefully be fit enough come spring to get out on the fat bike I bought a while ago!? Lol.x❤️🏴🙈😁
@@crazyjane6570 Go low carbohydrate - vegetarian if you can. No vegetables that grow underground, no fruit, no starches. Carbs are sugars and starches. Have non-vegetarian food if you must, oils and fats in limited quantities. Your weight will drop away. Killing yourself with exercise won’t. Begin with eliminating food you shouldn’t eat. I am 76. Have been doing this for several years now and reduces 10 kg in the first two months.
This is an interesting topic though probably none of the possibilities of extended life are likely to benefit me, being in my 70's. It is exciting to think that my grandchildren may have access to a longer life span with all the possible opportunities. I think if humans are longer lived, they will be able to expand on their talents and learning, contributing on more levels. The fly in the ointment is that the cost will be set so high that only the elites will have access, an extension of the corruption that is already a curse on humanity.
We just did a clinical study (submitted for publication in a peer reviewed dermatology journal) and we were shocked by what we found. The subjects in the study ranged from 26 to 68. The study evaluated the regenerative potential of the skin's fat cells. And guess who did the best? The sixty year olds. Yes!
Always a good topic for the middle-aged viewer. But this report is middle school level. Most 12 year olds aren't concerned about aging or extending of life span.
@@MrNote-lz7lh one can live long life even without reversing aging with help of blood pressure and other pharma and medical equipment, but their biological age will be equal to their calendar age. Reversing aging means at calendar age of 70 to have biological age of 35.
If you're interested in this topic, check out Harvard professor David Sinclair's YT podcast. Or Adrew Huberman's interview with him. He's specialized in ageing, giving science based info on what everybody can do to slow aging. Most of these tools are zero or low cost. No affiliation here, just a fan of both podcasts
While de-aging technology will very likely benefit mostly the rich and not the poor, I don’t think this is a good reasoning for not developing this technology. We shouldn’t prevent the rich from having good things, but rather we should make whatever we can so that everyone can have more stuff.
The companies in this space will go through clinical trials, regulatory approval, and commercialization similar to any other medical therapy. Many countries have universal healthcare, and Medicare in the U.S. covers people 65 and older. Therapies that target aspects of the biology of aging will very likely be widely available. The reality is that the rich only want the poor to live longer so they can work for more years and have their labour be exploited more. Doesn't matter if they end up living unhealthy lives as long as they can show up to work. Capitalism is about extracting maximum value without inflicting lethal damage. Chronic health problems are also a profitable industry for big pharma and insurance. Then there are those who prey on the poor, exhausted, and vulnerable - scammers, grifting politicians, special interest groups who want to blame it on migrants...
The reason some people might say they don't want to live forever is because they can't believe it is possible and their answer is part of their way to manage the terror of supposed upcoming death.
We’ve already extended our lifespan and improved our quality of health. What a blessing it is to be living in these times. I say we keep pushing the envelope! Perhaps 100 will be the new 70!
This particular presentation wasn't bad for futures content. Most futures content concentrates on a singular future: this acknowledged a variety of factors that may drive a wide variety of futures, and that's good. We need more of that. The other side of the argument is that it didn't go into what less desirable futures may look like and how those futures might be distributed. If I may offer a different critique, it would be helpful if you talked about the time frame of the futures you're considering. I got a Master of Science degree in Studies of the Future, and as a university-trained professional futurist, we normally talk about our futures between 10 and 50 years out in time. Out to about 10 years from now, futures are stabilized by our presents: it's highly unlikely we'll see radical change over the next decade. Beyond 50 years, the possibilities for change become so great that we can't make useful speculation about possible, plausible and probable futures. With that said, do you have a futurist on staff? Having a professional futurist, either on staff or available as a consultant, can help ensure your content is of the highest quality and considers the range of social (S), technological/scientific (T), environmental (E), economic (E) and political (P) or STEEP factors. A good futurist can help you come up with multiple alternative futures to explore in every episode, so people can get a better idea of the range of possible futures we face. It's good that this video talked about some of the problems that might arise in a future in which aging might be arrested (I'm tempted to make a joke about aging, once arrested, having to do time, but I'll try to restrain myself . . .) and some of the drivers of those potential problems. I see some good potential for this series. I'd love to discuss the series in more detail, but this post is getting a little long.
Re: elder life and continuing to live purposefully It’s sad that “retirement” life in our society is (usually) expecting to do only one or more of these things: -doing nothing but vacationing and fun things -stopping all work -doing nothing -staying at home -living in a nursing home It’s a shame more people don’t realize they can contribute, still-just in alternate ways versus a drone worker: -being closer to and being around & more involved with kids & grandkids -volunteering in their communities, churches, scouting, etc -part-time teaching, mentoring, or even just sharing of crafts, hobbies, etc, though schools, community libraries, scout troops/packs, rec center courses, community tour guides, etc -part-time at work as a senior advisor or mentor -Being an active & friendly neighbor, sharing and listening to younger neighbors
Right now we work through our healthy years and retire when we are broken and worn out no able to fully enjoy the fruits of our labor. We don’t need to live longer but it would be nice to have more quality years. Imagine being a woman dedicating yourself to a career and at 55 decide it’s time to settle and have kids (without freezing your eggs) have the kids and be health and present into their adulthood. It’s possible if this tech pans out.
I think that as we approach a cure for aging, we need to address the fact that people will need to have the choice to end their life when they decide they are ready, whatever age that's at, and making that choice should not carry the stigma it does today. It'll be a significant cultural and legal hurdle to overcome that will take a long time. If we don't start changing now then by the time we cure aging and people are wanting to make the choice, they will have a real challenge ahead.
Great forethought...deciding when to move on.. Good incentive for the future possibility...curing aging in itself creates another "elephant in the room" - speaking of living long... as you stated, wisely. Funny, the thought of Kudzu came to mind. Also the concept of natural balance...are we tipping the scales as is...at 7 trillion. Although, I feel that Darwinian theory of evolution was an opportunist and pseudo scientific assumption, obliviously. As a wise old lady told me...its all up to nature, the nature of the person, and that person in their relationship to nature. Some souls (people) come and live for a very short time and others for longer but shorter than given and others are patience enough to see the process through.
Aging is dependent on the human immune system. The human immune system is dependent on not just the human genome and epigenetics BUT also on the state of the gut microbiome genome community which in turn is dependent on a healthy diet. Hence, Aging is dependent on dietary habits too.
That’s right! I’m Jeovany Vasquez, I was 16 years old, I never wanted to grow up and be 17 years older!!! But I don’t wanted to die for 70, 80, 90, or 100 years of older!!!! But I wanted to stay 16 forever, and I ate some oranges in everyday!!! and I went to grandma’s house, I just ate some Grapes, Apples, Oranges, and other Healthy fruits. Because I never wanted to be in the future for 2022-3800 years!!! I WANTED TO LIVE FOREVER!!!!! Because future of the years made me nightmares!!!!
I am 73 years old, I take good care and I am lucky, zombi cells are not atacking me yet, I feel very young, that is why I say; so long you are colaborating with the sociaty you should always have the right to live. Not only robotes should be inmortals.
The main driver life span expansion in the western economy during the 20th century is public health infrastructure - clean water treatment, sewage infrastructure, garbage collection - it reduced the environmental stresses that killed most people.
You don't really mention the economic costs of aging on society as a whole. Both private and public healthcare systems have every incentive to want to reduce these costs, which would likely greatly increase the accessibility of anti-aging therapies.
@@JatPhenshllem Neither private or public health insurance would agree to let people grow old solely for the sake of enriching for profit healthcare. The cost savings on their end would vastly outweigh what for profit medicine could offer in exchange.
@@worldofcyn And that's what often gets overlooked in this discussion. The powers that be aren't going to extend average lifespan solely out of benevolence, but because we work more, spend more, pay more taxes and need less support when we're alive and healthy.
Hopefully we will get smart and invest in things that really matter, like safe bicycle lanes, walking paths, locally grown vegetables, more support for healthy activities. The US has a tendency to sell the problem then the cure. We need more socially responsible businesses and honest government to support both public and private initiatives in overall health.
Unfortunately, many data are not correct! Life expectancy starts to shorten from 1996 onwards, we know the main reasons, stress, diet, inactivity, so I don't expect anything to change in the future! I am a non-smoker and rarely drink alcohol, but Jeanne Calment smoked and drank for 95 years and lived the longest of all (122)!!! That's not crucial either, those three reasons are crucial!!!
I really had fantasies when I'm in my senior age. I would still look like a person in my 20s and usually work like every young blood is doing. Then I'm already 464 years old and I've been selected in the space agency to become a space army, ranger or something cool. Even though they know I'm 400+ years old but my vitality and strengths are still qualified because of my youthful appearance and my internal system have met qualifications. I wouldn't feel very alone when I had a lot of descendants and relatives who are approaching 100-400 years old and wanted to do something new into their lives.
Do you know what I find really interesting? The person who was saying that most corporations wouldn’t hire someone who is over 50 but would be willing to hire someone who is 17 there’s several reasons for that it depends on who you’re talking to and what is their motivation? Now perhaps that’s his belief And perhaps that’s been his experience, which is where the belief came from because he’s basing, engaging it on his own experience Or what he’s witnessed I don’t really understand why people think they can bypass their mortality by being completely ignorant and avoidance in their approach to their well-being. I also don’t understand why people believe that smoking and drinking and all of these things are super bad for you but they don’t seem to think about the things that they don’t know and learn about those things, and start applying real health practices to their life for the purpose of longevity , We live in a very strange society where people think they can just take a magic bullet, or a magic pill or magic vaccination or shot and be done with being responsible and accountable for their life. You have this magnificent machinery, called the body and it is capable of so much and yet you don’t know anything about it really and you know so much more about your actual car, which is also a vehicle Then you know about your physical vessel I think that’s really more important than trying to undo the damage that people do to themselves by eating absolute trash, and a diet that isn’t even meant for them. There’s only one way to handle it and it’s really called lifestyle change. And it Hass to be a permanent change. I can’t just be warm and do it for a week and I’m gonna get it for month and then that’s that Look at the blue zones all the centurions who have made it above and beyond 100 years and you’re promising them 90 when they could live another 10 maybe 30 years without debility, being completely healthy and dying of natural state ? I don’t think that those types of addresses are correct. I don’t think that you should be playing Frankenstein with your DNA. I think that you should just learn more about it and support it and within reason don’t really stretch your imagination in the way of what you can get away with because technically you can’t, including this injection that you’re talking about. Sarah people who have died from cancer, and there are people who have come back from the brink of death after receiving a diagnosis and traditional or western treatment for that cancer when the cancer was demonized and it was just a warning sign it was really problem and the cancer was telling you where that problem exist but instead of looking at it from that angle, people are like oh my God we have to destroy the cancer, which means you’re also destroying the body And well it’s the only place you have to live so your soul is going to have to go back to stores if you screw this up in an eye much earlier age than you would’ve hoped Now, ironically people passed away at younger ages back in whatever year or decade or century Because they probably weren’t eating right they weren’t getting the right nutrients. They didn’t know much about the body either they took it for granted they lived hard lives. They worked hard, but the majority of the work wasn’t for someone else it was for maintaining their own life, and yet they were still very ill equipped, and under educated The whole thing is really just a mystery as to how ignorant people can choose to be and yet ignorance is choice and we see it more today than ever we’re surrounded by seen and unseen causes of cancer, and it is what has been created by our society, our false beliefs the lies that we’ve bought therefore we were sold as slaves to the commercial and consumerism that everyone is under now, but I do think a lot of people are waking up and I’m very pleased about that because that means people will naturally live longer if they stop participating in all the reindeer games that is shortening their life and it’s what they call fools gold When you say that people are living longer, they’re not living quality lives in this day and age and yet somehow you seem to be pretty proud of that thinking that vaccinations have actually helped. One fact they’ve actually contributed to people dying faster they’ve interfered with the immune system they’ve caused information they’ve caused damage to the mitochondria, which has intern caused death and disease as well as illness . You really shouldn’t play with your DNA And that’s why so many natural doctors have been murdered if my memory serves it’s been over 2000 doctors they just either disappeared and later turned up dead or met some terrible fate. There’s no accident in any of that the powers that be do not want people to believe they have Choice, and when someone is telling them the truth that person becomes a bull’s-eye What you lovely scientists and doctors are learning and you’re also learning that that’s also a lie is nothing more than what someone wants you to believe and you do you adopt it you preach it, you practice it and then one day you have an awakening And you realize you’ve been playing on the wrong side of the team or you’re on the wrong team altogether and that’s where a lot of the weakening come with this whole virus crap where they blamed it on the virus the government was paying medical institutions to fraudulently claim that the deaths were attributed to virus, when you said they had underlying conditions, some of which contributed that was diagnosed and others, which were not even discovered Because there was a huge payoff like $14,000 per person and diagnosis was $1400 per person and God knows what else was going on nobody really believes in the CDC anymore. It’s a business just like the FDA it’s all about how much money they can make They take bribes and they work for these companies who are extremely wealthy and who have an agenda they are so Dr. scientific reports and medical journals or those publications that end up in the journals so that people can be misled just like the Bible I was curious to hear what the next billion dollar idea was that will rob people and give them false hope and also give them the ability to be enabled so they don’t have to take accountability for their life. They can just take your wealth and spend it on the shots . That way they can live forever and yet they wouldn’t be happy just we’re not designed to live forever. So yeah, very interesting but I’ve heard is Lena matter how much money I have whatever be interested in it and I don’t recommend it for anyone. I don’t care how much money you have.
im ok to never die, i dont need an ultimate meaning or to say it better i dont think there is an ultimate "something", the more we live the more normal it will become and more timespan we will ty to get (im looking at you turtles, we ARE coming)
I got hired at my present job at 60. Younger guys tend to have no upper body strength. The boxes when I run the scale weigh 40 pounds. My bar at home has 45, no problem.
As I understand it, fasting mimics effects like famines or lean winters, which causes the body to change in ways that increase survival, and those changes are passed down for a few generations through descendants.
Such a fantastic channel! Discussing aging and natural health is so important. Planet Ayurveda really helped me-can’t wait to share this with my neighbors!
We must not just consider the quantity of one's life, but its quality also. The real question: can you afford to live 150 years? Does that mean we will have to work approx 100 years? What does this mean for female fertility - will ladies have a monthly period for 135 years (I hope not!)? I don't know if I could emotionally live for 150 years... there's so much hardship, tragedy, suffering & cruelty in you world. Perhaps 70 years of living with the nonsense people get up to is quite enough, I don't think I could do it for 150 years! I might consider it if I was wealthy and living in a world of peace, prosperity & sustainable living where everyone had a good life and the world co-operated to make a better world for all (everybody wins) rather than competing with each other (someone must win and the rest must lose so that the winner can feel superior). I don't like the world I live in now: living in it for 150 years is not an attractive prospect for me.
As answer to your proposal (ideology), I would propose that you have a look to a very instructive social experiment, that you may consult here: th-cam.com/video/NgGLFozNM2o/w-d-xo.html Best wishes
@@corneliusbulik4856 Thanks for the link - I am familiar with ALL the issues raised. Some valid issues (people are capable of not being rats altho some aren't), some not so much any more. In a nutshell - it's complicated. Yes, population is growing (expected to peak at around 11 billion) in many parts of the world, but declining in others. But when we consider resource use (per capita consumption), it's the wealthy - not the poor - that are the biggest culprits. And if we look at history and who is responsible for economic, social & political manipulation on behalf of vested interests... again its the wealthy countries who are guilty (not to mention the catastrophic changes to our enviro, biodiversity & climate etc). The idea that the poor are responsible for all social ills is outdated & blatantly incorrect. Being alive requires finances (quantity of life) as well as having a personal hope for the future (quality of life). Things are not looking good for most people right now. There are attempts to make development more equal & sustainable (2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development, Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, Habitat III, Beijing Declaration, UNCAC, Paris Agreement etc). If countries can live up to their obligations & commitments perhaps human society has a chance. There will always be richer & poorer people in the world, but being poorer should not mean "hell on Earth" - it's possible to be poorer financially but still enjoy a good quality of life (be healthy, have enough of the important things, enjoy quality relationships with family, friends, community & society, have hope for the future etc - the things that make life worth living). I'll return the favour and send you some links.
@@corneliusbulik4856 Now the bad new - MIT has predicted that things will not go well for the human civilisation (and we're ahead of schedule) th-cam.com/video/kVOTPAxrrP4/w-d-xo.html You want to live for 150 to 200 years?
Depends on the mindset of the younger generations in which the aged are living perhaps to some minor or greater degree. Communal thought can greatly imprint reality. How discerning are these effects? Perhaps studies as to this nature could be dug up, or performed to this end somehow. Biochemical livelihood may be affected by this more than we currently know, or have been able to be aware of.
I'm pretty sure the 1% will be the only ones who get their lives extended, they pretty much already have the best available anti-aging and healthier lifestyle benefits than the rest of us. The movie Elysium is a good example that sums up how it will be in the future based on how it already is now.
Yeah that's nonsense. For most people extending life and health span by 10-15% would be a piece of cake if they only stuck to a healthy diet, regular movement and good sleep. Plus stuff like certain senoltytics, SIRTUIN activators etc. are pretty cheap and by that I mean I can afford them as a student on a small budget. EVOO, fish oil, D3 and brokkoli sprouts aren't a burden on a budget.
@@popelgruner595 People who don't have servants and personal chefs don't have the time or money to eat healthier and shop for, keep and cook fresh food 24/7. They also can't afford proven to work anti-aging cosmetics/skin care and medicines which are only available to the wealthy to freely use regularly. They don't have the best doctors or paid health professionals by their side keeping them in good health. If all that were available to everyone, it would be a piece of cake but it's not! Having a healthy lifestyle and good health isn't a choice. For most people it isn't even an option.
@@popelgruner595 have you ever heard of food deserts? in some areas of poverty within otherwise wealthy countries, it's actually cheaper to eat unhealthy food - and it gets addictive. poor people may also be even more tied down by long work hours and have no time to travel for healthier food, some don't even have the time or the spare capacity to think about that... until shit hits the fan and everything collapses. the reality is that the rich only want the poor to live longer so they can work for more years and have their labour be exploited more. doesn't matter if they end up living unhealthy lives as long as they can show up to work. capitalism is about extracting maximum value without inflicting lethal damage. chronic health problems are also a profitable industry for big pharma and insurance. then there are those who prey on the poor, exhausted, and vulnerable - scammers, grifting politicians, special interest groups who want to blame it on migrants...
sooo. you watching tv all day merits your right to be where they are? also if you turned off the tv to. learn the abc an 123 you could see alex jonessteinberg an this extented car warranty dealer lied to ya an they die bout the same time as everyone else
Life extension is not unnatural nor does it take away your humanity. Will it make me happy? Yes because I’m alive, healthy, young/physically fit and beautiful.
As science advances we will definitely solve this issue,and not only making aging nice,but there may be a way to reverse aging on a surface level now,but first we need find at the cellular level,and why we exist as we exist,then as this is solved then from there go into each phase aging and it’s reversal,as they can so now in mice to an extent,or what causes living tissue to stop moving into growth and switch to stability or go in reverse.Itbwill take some deep research,but we almost have the technology ready for this,and as some species can regrow their missing tales,hold the key to our solution.
The future of aging is that the very rich with old fashioned self enriching attitudes live long and the rest can die for them, hoping to be allowed in their circle by treating other humans badly.
If I can live to 150 or much longer, why not? As long I'm healthy full of energy and willing to live, why do I want to die? I think it will be awesome to start a new career at 100 years old, also get to experience new technologies for the future, there is also space traveling and new worlds to find, I think it will be awesome.
I do research on senescence, and you have to be very very careful with these treatments, two drugs that work super well in other mouse tissues caused multiple sclerosis like symptoms in the brain.
![[MV] A leap of faith...ความเชื่อใจครั้งสุดท้าย (From "Petrichor the series")](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/U1piZH2CNXA/mqdefault.jpg)
The 'death gives meaning to human life' sounds like a bad rationalization. People should live for as long as they are enjoying themselves.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Why?
Yes i agree, there is always something positive to do or learn while living
I think the point is that if you lived forever, why would you be motivated to do anything today? There’s always tomorrow.
@@TimJohnston911 now our days people's do that, is call procrastination, the world is full of knowledge and there is still lots of things the we haven't even discovered yet, it comes down to the person and how lazy that person is, with an extended life span there is so much to learn the it will require eons to learn all of it, so no, I don't think 1,000 years to live is enough.
Just a point to the average 35 years lifetime they had in ancient times... it was heavily skewed by the fact that they had huge child mortality rates. If you don't take into account the deaths at early age, the average life expectancy in the XIX century was around 55, not 35.
Yeah, that was bothering me as well
The reasons she gives (vaccines, germ theory, and antibiotics) are largely responsible for the drop in childhood mortality rates. Sooo... that's kind of the point.
Same here!
Glad you pointed that out. Stroll through any graveyard with 18th, 19th century graves and you'll see many who died quite old.
The myth of dying at 35 needs to die -- at 35, I suppose. Every time I hear someone throw out this false fact it causes me to doubt everything they say after.
Anti aging does not mean immortality. Immortality means not dying from anything, while with anti aging you can still die but not from the aging.
True!
You're absolutely right. There was a famous psychic who said we will reach immortality in the year 4000 something.
Indeed. Anything that could kill you at 21, still can...
So, continue to wear your seat belt, know where emergency exists are, avoid homicidal people, wear your construction / motorcycle / sports helmet, listen to the light attendant's safety talk, avoid war zones (though some things may be worth that risk), know first aid (the life you save may be your own), look both ways before crossing streets (yes, like they told you in grade school), consider cryonics, wear your life jacket in small boats, install smoke detectors, etc...
(Although related rejuvenation technology will also let you recover from some traumatic accidents and mayhem that would finish you off, today. At the very least, try to keep your brain intact. Anything else, we may eventually be able to restore...)
@@stardolphin2 After 31 concussions, I mostly concur. Your brain is your most important resource. My only disagreement is with modern seatbelts as they jar your brain so suddenly (namely the shoulder belt) as it stops the head too quickly. They need to be engineered for a more gradual stop.
Btw, not wearing my seatbelt has saved my life twice. I’m not advocating for not wearing a seatbelt but there are certain accidents where it will kill you.
Excellent explanation
I'm 30 & I already planned for my 120 years long life play which are as follows:
Eat only twice a day around 10AM & 7PM,
Take vitamin c rich foods,
Walk barefoot beside roads & public places,
Observe Sun light, rain water, breath natural fresh air from trees, drink copper rich water enjoy sky view sleeps, etc.....
I agree with the goal of extending the "quality of life" years, even if doesn't extend lifespan. This would make life more active and enjoyable for seniors while simultaneously reducing age-related medical costs and the often-extreme costs of end-of-life care that barely extends "existence". This starts with diet, fitness and other self-care, but there is a place for medicine as well, if it can be shown to be both safe and effective.
AKA "healthspan"
i'm on the darker end of this spectrum: i believe if people aren't doing too good, and wanna avoid draining more resources, they should have the option of assisted suicide. we can debate what requirements are necessary, what type of mental health certification is needed, how to legally notify closest next of kins, etc. some european countries have already had legal euthanasia for a while now, so we do have case studies to look at as well.
@@alveolate Why not both? Same lifespan but much higher quality and health until near the end. You decide what to do at that point.
@@M.Campbell well, as long as the option to tap out is legal, healthspan away!
I think it's rather depressing that the only benefit you see in extending life is on reduced costs and money. Those would become even less of an issue if we just didn't age at all and lived longer.
I have a great grandmother she is 111yo and every time I think of her I ask myself how is she still alive... Impressive!
What is the secret of her long live?
@@reenusharma5156 I don't know haha but she just stays laid in the bed and her mind is gone all she speaks doesn't make any sense most part of the time, and she sleeps a lot. She is just there alive waiting for the day to come.
@@canaldoues no I am saying, in her younger days what was her diet or lifestyle regime??
@@reenusharma5156 oh no idea bruh, we come from a poor family so she might have some hard time. I think she had a sister that also reached old age like 97 or so. Could be genetics.
My great grandmother lived until 109 yrs old.
- IF Diet (or 24h+ fast)
- Solid sleep
- Physical activity
- Mind exercises
- Healthy relationships
- Stress balance
- Clean diet
Fool u don't get sleep if u fast
No smoking, no drinking, no drugs no partying late, salt, sugar, fats, carbs, fun... No Thanks. You are not even guarantied that you won't get hit by a bus, some new virus other random event. If life has no flavor it's not worth living longer it will just seem like it till your boring end when you die like a bird in some box were they stuff the elderly without care. Live till you die.
Memento mori ! Amor Fati !
@@1ManNamedDan live halal
@@1ManNamedDansalt rock salt is good not iodized salt because iodized salt is synthetic this chemical..
Consume rock salt and ads water 2 liter water because is healthy blood
@@1ManNamedDanTry the 5/2 or the 4/3 fast. That gives the body time to rejuvenate.
The whole idea of people not wanting to live longer is that very few /healthy/ people ever say that they would choose to die now. So, if healthspan increases, there is a decent chance people will still not want to 'live forever' but will be perfectly fine living well into triple digits.
People just can't grasp the concept, kinda like if you forced a kid to decide their own future for the next 60 years. They'd make horrible decisions. Same thing here - we can't ask people whether this is a good idea, they aren't capable of answering. No offense, but I've heard so many analogues to "I will be a president" when people talk about biological immortality.
I am 59 I think I already lived long enough. Who will want to live longer? How boring same bs every single day . Been there done that. Can you imagine if a bad person or a criminal also got to live longer? How fun more poop from that nasty person on this beautiful earth 🌍.
@@elbacar4838 But that's just because you can't imagine how the world is going to change very soon. Sure, being 30 for 100 years during a static industrial age might end up being boring, but we live in a time where so many windows into completely different and amazing possibilities open.
If you are an "Earth type", you might want to hang on for Solar system colonization which is right behind the corner. And if you can deal with or learn to deal with digital technologies, VR will enable you to experience things no one can even dream of yet.
You will not be able to become bored, because there will be so much to experience you won't even be able to hold it all in your memory - ever read a book again, after many years, and it felt like reading it for the first time? Maybe even better, because of nostalgia and vague familiarity.
That will apply here too. You might literally lead individual "lives" one after another, either sandboxed where you can do whatever you want in a completely different environment, or a lifespan-analogue of todays movies for a directed experience.
And finally, with deep-learning, computers can study your reactions and present you content you are bound to enjoy. Not just eternal bliss - which would get boring - it will determine what level of frustration and what amount of obstacles you enjoy to overcome while doing things. It will make you happy, whatever that means at the moment.
Basically, we are constructing a Heaven here.
I just hope that if they're going to extend life, they're going to have a major campaign to slow birth rates. Because this planet isn't getting any bigger. And with climate change, basic necessities like water, food and space to live and grow that food are going to be more limited.
@@Eldorado1239 ya, I'd hang on until it seemed like life was no longer making progress in any way because I'm way too curious about the future and how far we really can go right now. And once I decided I've had enough, I'd just let old and grab me and live out those years until the inevitable. I could not imagine assisted suicide honestly. The choice of death is not as easy to make as choosing to live. I'd rather have no choice at all when it comes. That way, I can at least make peace with the natural order.
Life expectancy was so low because infant and child mortality was insanely high, not because people died in their 30's. If you made it past childhood, you could expect to live to see your 60's or 70's. It's not that people were dying at 35, it's that all the people dying in childhood and infancy dragged the overall expectancy way down.
This needed to be said. So many people don’t understand this and I always get frustrated when people think that ancient people lived 30 years.
Also death in childbirth contributed.
No matter what Volpe's opinion, people dont care about their lifespans effect on a Capitalist society.
The _average_ net worth between me and Bill Gates is $62.5 billion lol
Not true. Yes, higher infant mortality contributed to lower average life expectancies. But before the widespread deployment of vaccines and antibiotics, many people were also dying early from infectious diseases that have now been virtually eliminated by vaccines, and simple infections that are now easily cured with antibiotics. When Social Security started in 1935, 62 was chosen as the age to start collecting benefits because the average life expectancy was only 58. Most people would not live long enough to collect benefits. That had nothing to do with infant mortality.
I'm 50 and trying to start over but I feel like I'm too old for it. If I knew I had a lot longer to lead a healthy energetic life I'd be much more motivated and happy.
50 is the new 40.
It’s never too late to start.
@@Linksoer How is 50 the new 40?
I think it is a reference to people acting and dressing younger. I thinking eating and health may be a bit healthier, yet obesity is a really big problem. So, I don't know ..I guess it is a state of mind.
@@Supremepikachu Is this a serious question? If yes, then it means that the way people perceive 50 year olds today is how they perceived 40 year olds some years ago.
I didn't start seriously taking care of myself until I retired at 62. Now, at 66, I've spent four years correcting that and I'm in better shape than I was in my thirties - by a lot. I've dropped 50 pounds, work out 5 days a week, take a handful of nutraceuticals (including a senolytic) and follow the longevity research for new ideas. Don't wait for perfection (paralysis by analysis) just start with what we know, diet and exercise, knowing that will add 10 healthy years right now.
I've seen some studies talk about how intermittent fasting and fasting in general can help rid ourselves of some if the cells that are involved in aging
Thanks
I also believe intermittent fasting.in my country among buddhist monks live nearly 100 years or more than 95 years. They take only breakfast and lunch before 11.30 after that they take only water or some light fruit drinks. They allow to break the fast next day morning 7am
If we can live longer lots of the thoughts expressed by the people in this video will change. People will care more about the environment and resources, people that live longer will be willing to learn new trades. We should all live longer, not just the wealthy will benefit from the medical advances, poor people will be included in the ability to live long also.
Damn, Son! Hit that shit right on the head!!👌🏻🤘🏻
If for they'd ever come up with some miracle cure for aging and letting humans live for a very, very long time it'll be only for the filthy rich believe me. When I say filthy rich I mean the very top of the top. Our society would turn into a sci-fi movie. I can't remember the name of it but that's *exactly* how I'd imagine it to be. People are very selfish and greedy and this will not change anytime soon. I don't understand a "fulfilled" life? It seems very different depending on who you ask and something you can't generalize.
@ Chris Stearns
No they won't, only if it's proven and people actually do live twenty more years. They'll be absorbed in staying alive. Their thoughts won't much surpass their previous involvements and monies. Energy may be greater but not by much especially if they are single seniors. They will be ecstatic to make it to the laundry room by themselves. Go to your local senior living buildings and observe the seniors living there. What you say may be true but not until it's proven and living twenty more years is factual.
The longer people live the more likely they'll spend all day watching Fox News and posting stupid memes on Facebook.
@@LIZZIE-lizzie I am capable of thinking outside the container holding the box, you can trust what I say.
If you're pain stricken by grief about losing a loved one,the best way to give a tribute to the person, is to not die.
Thank you for that. 🩵👍🏻🩵
I used to want to live to 120, but after my Dad died last year, I don't give a shit about living long now. I just wanna live young.
That is the point live young.
Someone else in the comment section wrote something so good: “
Matt Alex
12 days ago
If you're pain stricken by grief about losing a loved one,the best way to give a tribute to the person, is to not die.”
@@janmed1592 vivir joven siendo un anciano no gracias ojalá se pudiera rejuvenecer hasta ser un adulto joven otra vez
We really need to stop exaggerating past life expectancy figures when discussing people already here and able to comprehend videos such as this. In 1841, beating infant mortality added about 7 years, and beating early childhood mortality on top of that (age 5) added another 7 (14 total) years. Yes it makes a great Family Guy cutaway picturing peasant farmers who died en masse in their 30s, but that's just not really how it worked.
Exactly. It just sounds so good on paper. Generally speaking it was a harder growing up but once you were past that you could actually live for quite a while, just like today even without medicine. Some people are just extremely sturdy while others are not. Just look at the covid situation that popped up. Nothing says that won't happen again but next time we might not be as "lucky". It should have been a real eye opener. Just imagine some really nasty virus that takes a month to kick in. It would have spread across the globe like a wildfire before anyone even realized what happened.
Not true about being not hired. I was hired as an engineer at 50 yrs old and worked for another 15 years before I retired pretty comfortably. Never give up, work as much as you want.
You gave me hope I’m 38 and working in aerospace as an electrical engineer. I started off as a tech, but hopefully within a few months I’ll get that promotion to engineer. I graduated in December 2022.
@@MarioRodriguez-gr8wc There is a great need for engineers. People are not choosing to become engineers as much as they used to... it is a hard to get through the education. Most people don't have what it takes... I am sure you will have a great career all of your life and work as long as you want :) Be sure to put yourself on LinkedIn, and always keep your options open, and continue to learn and gain experience .
Just a note: intermittent fasting has been shown to promote autophagy, thereby removing senescent cells.
I wondered why that was left out of the discussion, it is extremely inexpensive and available to everyone who chooses to restrict caloric intake and use in little self control, where in,I fear lies the answer.
@@Elias12 I just want to die looking young. I don't care about living much longer. The idea of living old weak and miserable for 50+ years is what worries me.
Fasting I am currently reading up on & definitely going to try myself.x
Supposedly exercise promotes autophagy as well.
Prolonged fasting has even greater effects than intermittent fasting. Supposedly diminishing returns kick in after about 96 hours.
The planet doesn't suffer from limited resources. We can already feed about 10 billion people, which is about what the human population is expected to peak at (would be even less if poor countries got richer faster). The problem is supply chains and valuation of money over life.
We could sustain 100 billion people but we would all be forced to live in pods and suck bio fluid out of our neo-corporate overlord mandated happy bottles
@@Mrflowerproductions No, we couldn't because corporations are completely antithetical to super large population support.
@@Mrflowerproductions
Spoken like a true brain dead non-thinker.
Anyone arguing that ageing and death is a good thing is just... I have no words to adequately describe how abhorrent that view is. It's like if you argued that premodern infant mortality levels were morally good and should have been preserved.
We're so used to being condemned to the horror of our own mortality that we rationalize it as a good thing to make facing it easier, but it is a disease, and those wanting to block us from developing a cure are evil beyond words.
The fact that improving human life would result in additional challenges is an argument to address those challenges and their underlying causes, not deny making lives better.
Well put. 👍
Isn't the real issue here those who get to live a better life... and the rest who don't? We as a race have so many hurdles to cross before we're truly ready for the next step. We're nowhere near that.
do you want elon musk or donald trump or jeff bezos to live forever?
@@huldu sounds like chicken and egg situation to me. Which needs to come first? Perhaps better longevity will be a catalyst for an economic and / or societal paradigm shift. Rather than wait for the shift before looking into better longevity. Better longevity would reduce the economic strain on health care as well as a greying society and pension funds.
@@BAC-fn9gj just send them into space. Two of them are already prioritising spending their wealth on that rather than healing the planet.
Did a life expectancy of 35 meant that people dropped dead at 36 years old, or that the huge amount of children's deaths lowered the number? History is full of individuals that lived more than 35 years old.
On the other hand, about the mice in the experiment, if they were younger and healthier, what they died of? Were they killed or became cancerous all over?
All the papers I have read so far that "de-aged" mice had them die of cancer. Clearing out senescence cells, injecting Stem cells, Activating telomerase,... All leads to massive amounts of cancer. Then again mice and especially lab mice are very very cancer prone to begin with
Most likely eaten or die from virus. People didn't know about germs back then.
Agreed, here is some more info on that very subject.
There is a an often overlooked distinction between life expectancy and life span. Life expectancy is an average. If you have two children, and one díes before their first birthday but the other lives to the age of 70, their average life expectancy is 35. Which is in fact the problem when discussing “ancient” times, the high ínfant mortalíty rate that is (and young chíldren dęath rate was also high).
Back in 1994 a study looked at every man entered into the Oxford Classical Dictionary who lived in ancient Greece or Rome. Their ages of dęath were compared to men listed in the more recent Chambers Biographical Dictionary.
Of 397 ancients in total, 99 díed víolently. Of the remaining 298, those born before 100BC lived to a median age of 72 years. Those born after 100BC lived to a median age of 66. (The authors speculate that the introduction and prevalence of dangerøus lead plumbing may have led to this apparent shortening of life).
Good questions. Have to always be suspicious of statistics because they can be manipulated so many ways.
If a baby dies at birth & someone else lives to 100, the stats for their life expectancy would be 50 years old - so like the vid says, at present the best answer is: no matter what age you are, exercise, eat smart, and sleep well.
Please make this happen, Because looking older after 30, and after 40 sucks you want too look younger.
The more you think that way, the more it will happen to you.
@@ravishingravebabe2916 Dumb platitude with zero evidence.
"But will living longer make us happier?" Perhaps we need to ask this question as if we're the first generation that actually gets to answer it, instead of retell the stories of those before us who had to comfort themselves for having little choice in the matter. What society has actually had healthspans or lifespans far beyond ours? This is uncharted territory, and more than ever before, it's what we make of it.
Well, I can't see any downsides
The idea that other societies were rationalizing their lack of access to immortality is not very well founded. Societies have always envisioned better worlds than the ones they had, why would they suddenly make an exception for lifespans?
It’s possible that once we die we realize things are much better than they were when we were living in this world. See Bob Schneider’s song “I’m Good Now.”
More home owners!
Life shud be incredible.. but it's not long enough and people are still boring..
I think the "change in society" would have come from family/housing: The construction for multi-generational homes. One of the biggest issues is housing. What if people, if they are living longer and healthier, had three generations per-house hold. They could generate more wealth, as a family, to buy a house to accommodate more than a dozen members. Constructed as an "open" duplex. Meaning the house starts by allowing a family of 4 and an older couple to live. People might actually get more out of an upbringing with parents and grandparents around. Passing on of knowledge (life lessons) and generational wealth. Imagine a house that has two kitchens two "master bedrooms" but one side has two extra rooms for offspring. U-shaped with a central "court yard" for gardening (food). These rooms would be smaller than what we have nowadays. Think more along the lines master being your kid's room and kids room being half that to simply accommodate sleep and necessities.....
I think we overthink the happiness element in life extension. It should be living in a satisfactory way. That means financially safe. That also means complete health care. This allows happiness to occur from doing things you like and the opportunity to explore new ventures. Without financial safety and complete health care, extended longevity can become a bitter almost surf-like existence where people live from day to day paying corporate to live longer.
I'm surprised to see this topic starting to become so widespread that PBS covered it recently. I still think of the longevity space as an underground hobby.
If you can extend your health span throughout old age, then you have already won a great deal of quality of life. If you are also not geneticly predisposed to certain diseases, then your chances are good to live a long and healthy life. All you need, is a healthy diet (fruits, veggies, little or no alcohol), regular physical activity, such as cycling, jogging, swimming, etc., regular good nights sleep and friends to spend your time with. But you also need a stable income in order to live a good and healthy life. For many people, this will be just as much of a key issue as leading a healthy lifestyle.
Hi, FYI -
The biggest problem for the whole of humanity is developing Maturity.
There really are only two possible outcomes...
1). A maniac becomes world dictator, and destroys mankind.
2). A golden age, where people actually mature, become wise, and live incredibly long lives
Serving each other, for everyone's benefit.
I have been an endurance athlete most of my life, the physical capacity I had at 25 I still have at 71 because of a daily training routine. I also never get sick so is strenuous exercise the key to feeling young? Yes, I believe that is true.
Wow! Respect.❤
I too believe in daily exercise. At 76, I have been able to trek all day. I stay low Carb and vegetarian.
I’ve been unwell for a good few years & gained so much weight it’s unreal. I’m thinking the fasting might be the way to go first since I have a lot of weight to lose plus some light exercise since my weight is limiting my activity atm. Then hopefully be fit enough come spring to get out on the fat bike I bought a while ago!? Lol.x❤️🏴🙈😁
@@crazyjane6570 Go low carbohydrate - vegetarian if you can. No vegetables that grow underground, no fruit, no starches. Carbs are sugars and starches. Have non-vegetarian food if you must, oils and fats in limited quantities. Your weight will drop away. Killing yourself with exercise won’t. Begin with eliminating food you shouldn’t eat. I am 76. Have been doing this for several years now and reduces 10 kg in the first two months.
@@mayamaker8841 been vegetarian most of my life so that’s not a problem. Thank you for the advice. Xx❤️
This is an interesting topic though probably none of the possibilities of extended life are likely to benefit me, being in my 70's. It is exciting to think that my grandchildren may have access to a longer life span with all the possible opportunities. I think if humans are longer lived, they will be able to expand on their talents and learning, contributing on more levels. The fly in the ointment is that the cost will be set so high that only the elites will have access, an extension of the corruption that is already a curse on humanity.
You should investigate Tru-Niagen. It’s something that could potentially have a very real impact on both your quality of life and your lifespan.
We just did a clinical study (submitted for publication in a peer reviewed dermatology journal) and we were shocked by what we found. The subjects in the study ranged from 26 to 68. The study evaluated the regenerative potential of the skin's fat cells. And guess who did the best? The sixty year olds. Yes!
So the skin changed to a more youthful and healthy look?
What did u do in the study??
Is that because the young subjects had nothing to rejuvenate?
@@arttoegemann Exactly.
Always a good topic for the middle-aged viewer.
But this report is middle school level. Most 12 year olds aren't concerned about aging or extending of life span.
Living longer and reverse aging are different concepts. I would rather reverse aging than live longer
If the aging can be reversed , the longetitude will be longer .
Wait. How are they different concepts? By reversing aging you do live longer.
@@MrNote-lz7lh one can live long life even without reversing aging with help of blood pressure and other pharma and medical equipment, but their biological age will be equal to their calendar age. Reversing aging means at calendar age of 70 to have biological age of 35.
If you're interested in this topic, check out Harvard professor David Sinclair's YT podcast. Or Adrew Huberman's interview with him. He's specialized in ageing, giving science based info on what everybody can do to slow aging. Most of these tools are zero or low cost. No affiliation here, just a fan of both podcasts
While de-aging technology will very likely benefit mostly the rich and not the poor, I don’t think this is a good reasoning for not developing this technology.
We shouldn’t prevent the rich from having good things, but rather we should make whatever we can so that everyone can have more stuff.
Eventually the price will fall to the point where poor people can buy an anti aging pill and take it once a month.
Yeah! Socialise the de-ageing medicine!
That's easier said than done.
The companies in this space will go through clinical trials, regulatory approval, and commercialization similar to any other medical therapy. Many countries have universal healthcare, and Medicare in the U.S. covers people 65 and older. Therapies that target aspects of the biology of aging will very likely be widely available. The reality is that the rich only want the poor to live longer so they can work for more years and have their labour be exploited more. Doesn't matter if they end up living unhealthy lives as long as they can show up to work. Capitalism is about extracting maximum value without inflicting lethal damage. Chronic health problems are also a profitable industry for big pharma and insurance. Then there are those who prey on the poor, exhausted, and vulnerable - scammers, grifting politicians, special interest groups who want to blame it on migrants...
Yes please!
The reason some people might say they don't want to live forever is because they can't believe it is possible and their answer is part of their way to manage the terror of supposed upcoming death.
Keeping people alive is always a resource. Death is bad. Mortality means failure.
This should be the main focus of all scientist’s caring aging should be a number one priority.
We’ve already extended our lifespan and improved our quality of health. What a blessing it is to be living in these times. I say we keep pushing the envelope! Perhaps 100 will be the new 70!
Cells are amazing
This particular presentation wasn't bad for futures content. Most futures content concentrates on a singular future: this acknowledged a variety of factors that may drive a wide variety of futures, and that's good. We need more of that. The other side of the argument is that it didn't go into what less desirable futures may look like and how those futures might be distributed.
If I may offer a different critique, it would be helpful if you talked about the time frame of the futures you're considering. I got a Master of Science degree in Studies of the Future, and as a university-trained professional futurist, we normally talk about our futures between 10 and 50 years out in time. Out to about 10 years from now, futures are stabilized by our presents: it's highly unlikely we'll see radical change over the next decade. Beyond 50 years, the possibilities for change become so great that we can't make useful speculation about possible, plausible and probable futures.
With that said, do you have a futurist on staff? Having a professional futurist, either on staff or available as a consultant, can help ensure your content is of the highest quality and considers the range of social (S), technological/scientific (T), environmental (E), economic (E) and political (P) or STEEP factors. A good futurist can help you come up with multiple alternative futures to explore in every episode, so people can get a better idea of the range of possible futures we face.
It's good that this video talked about some of the problems that might arise in a future in which aging might be arrested (I'm tempted to make a joke about aging, once arrested, having to do time, but I'll try to restrain myself . . .) and some of the drivers of those potential problems. I see some good potential for this series. I'd love to discuss the series in more detail, but this post is getting a little long.
Believe in it and it's golden
Thanks PBS for covering aging and Longevity! ❤
Thanks!
The answer is in the food we eat. Whole food plant dominant diets like those in the Blue Zones offer longevity with vitality.
Re: elder life and continuing to live purposefully
It’s sad that “retirement” life in our society is (usually) expecting to do only one or more of these things:
-doing nothing but vacationing and fun things
-stopping all work
-doing nothing
-staying at home
-living in a nursing home
It’s a shame more people don’t realize they can contribute, still-just in alternate ways versus a drone worker:
-being closer to and being around & more involved with kids & grandkids
-volunteering in their communities, churches, scouting, etc
-part-time teaching, mentoring, or even just sharing of crafts, hobbies, etc, though schools, community libraries, scout troops/packs, rec center courses, community tour guides, etc
-part-time at work as a senior advisor or mentor
-Being an active & friendly neighbor, sharing and listening to younger neighbors
Right now we work through our healthy years and retire when we are broken and worn out no able to fully enjoy the fruits of our labor. We don’t need to live longer but it would be nice to have more quality years. Imagine being a woman dedicating yourself to a career and at 55 decide it’s time to settle and have kids (without freezing your eggs) have the kids and be health and present into their adulthood. It’s possible if this tech pans out.
I think that as we approach a cure for aging, we need to address the fact that people will need to have the choice to end their life when they decide they are ready, whatever age that's at, and making that choice should not carry the stigma it does today. It'll be a significant cultural and legal hurdle to overcome that will take a long time. If we don't start changing now then by the time we cure aging and people are wanting to make the choice, they will have a real challenge ahead.
in japan it's pretty common for old people (and some younger people) to kill themselves if they feel like they're a burden
Great forethought...deciding when to move on.. Good incentive for the future possibility...curing aging in itself creates another "elephant in the room" - speaking of living long... as you stated, wisely. Funny, the thought of Kudzu came to mind.
Also the concept of natural balance...are we tipping the scales as is...at 7 trillion. Although, I feel that Darwinian theory of evolution was an opportunist and pseudo scientific assumption, obliviously.
As a wise old lady told me...its all up to nature, the nature of the person, and that person in their relationship to nature. Some souls (people) come and live for a very short time and others for longer but shorter than given and others are patience enough to see the process through.
Aging is dependent on the human immune system. The human immune system is dependent on not just the human genome and epigenetics BUT also on the state of the gut microbiome genome community which in turn is dependent on a healthy diet. Hence, Aging is dependent on dietary habits too.
Most people die of heart disease
That’s right! I’m Jeovany Vasquez, I was 16 years old, I never wanted to grow up and be 17 years older!!! But I don’t wanted to die for 70, 80, 90, or 100 years of older!!!! But I wanted to stay 16 forever, and I ate some oranges in everyday!!! and I went to grandma’s house, I just ate some Grapes, Apples, Oranges, and other Healthy fruits. Because I never wanted to be in the future for 2022-3800 years!!! I WANTED TO LIVE FOREVER!!!!! Because future of the years made me nightmares!!!!
you don't need to die, because of me, let see.
Very interesting topic!!
I do agree about taking a closer look and rethinking how we deal with and treat old people before we increase our lifespan.
I am 73 years old, I take good care and I am lucky, zombi cells are not atacking me yet, I feel very young, that is why I say; so long you are colaborating with the sociaty you should always have the right to live. Not only robotes should be inmortals.
We’re really saved! Thank goodness for this video!
just bs, they don't get the point
What a gorgeous film!
This episode was soooo good! This topic is super fascinating... and of course Swapna is just amazing!
Thank you Scott!
Ikr same thoughts .
ive been doing a blood cleanse.. and im looking younger and healthier
The main driver life span expansion in the western economy during the 20th century is public health infrastructure - clean water treatment, sewage infrastructure, garbage collection - it reduced the environmental stresses that killed most people.
Super interesting! I like that you covered science and ethics and philosophy together.
And what's more interesting is that she was wrong about both
Solent green movie with Edward g Robinson. And the keep are two of my favorites 💕
Thanks Swapna, that was very well presented.
Thanks for the video
You don't really mention the economic costs of aging on society as a whole. Both private and public healthcare systems have every incentive to want to reduce these costs, which would likely greatly increase the accessibility of anti-aging therapies.
But then the private sector won't make as much money off the elderly treatments. Anything I'm missing?
@@JatPhenshllem Neither private or public health insurance would agree to let people grow old solely for the sake of enriching for profit healthcare. The cost savings on their end would vastly outweigh what for profit medicine could offer in exchange.
@@VespersBell lol they definitely would want to increase lifespan to siphon more money
@@worldofcyn And that's what often gets overlooked in this discussion. The powers that be aren't going to extend average lifespan solely out of benevolence, but because we work more, spend more, pay more taxes and need less support when we're alive and healthy.
@@VespersBell Oh, right. Good points
I've heard of programs where young kids go to visit the elderly and they help them with homework and the kids give them companionship,it's a win win.
Great episode about aging!! We did one also on the benefits of coffee!
All medicine should be in the public domain!
No more medical copyrights!!
Why don't you look after yourself properly instead of relying on pharma?
Hopefully we will get smart and invest in things that really matter, like safe bicycle lanes, walking paths, locally grown vegetables, more support for healthy activities. The US has a tendency to sell the problem then the cure. We need more socially responsible businesses and honest government to support both public and private initiatives in overall health.
Interesting and thought provoking video. Thank you.
Unfortunately, many data are not correct! Life expectancy starts to shorten from 1996 onwards, we know the main reasons, stress, diet, inactivity, so I don't expect anything to change in the future! I am a non-smoker and rarely drink alcohol, but Jeanne Calment smoked and drank for 95 years and lived the longest of all (122)!!! That's not crucial either, those three reasons are crucial!!!
How can something that suppress tumours, also trigger cancer growth???. This is what she says on 4:00 and later, this does not make sense
I really had fantasies when I'm in my senior age. I would still look like a person in my 20s and usually work like every young blood is doing. Then I'm already 464 years old and I've been selected in the space agency to become a space army, ranger or something cool. Even though they know I'm 400+ years old but my vitality and strengths are still qualified because of my youthful appearance and my internal system have met qualifications. I wouldn't feel very alone when I had a lot of descendants and relatives who are approaching 100-400 years old and wanted to do something new into their lives.
What must I do in order to stop getting older and stay under 25 years old physically permanently? I want it happens more than anything else
Do you know what I find really interesting? The person who was saying that most corporations wouldn’t hire someone who is over 50 but would be willing to hire someone who is 17 there’s several reasons for that it depends on who you’re talking to and what is their motivation?
Now perhaps that’s his belief
And perhaps that’s been his experience, which is where the belief came from because he’s basing, engaging it on his own experience
Or what he’s witnessed
I don’t really understand why people think they can bypass their mortality by being completely ignorant and avoidance in their approach to their well-being.
I also don’t understand why people believe that smoking and drinking and all of these things are super bad for you but they don’t seem to think about the things that they don’t know and learn about those things, and start applying real health practices to their life for the purpose of longevity ,
We live in a very strange society where people think they can just take a magic bullet, or a magic pill or magic vaccination or shot and be done with being responsible and accountable for their life.
You have this magnificent machinery, called the body and it is capable of so much and yet you don’t know anything about it really and you know so much more about your actual car, which is also a vehicle Then you know about your physical vessel
I think that’s really more important than trying to undo the damage that people do to themselves by eating absolute trash, and a diet that isn’t even meant for them. There’s only one way to handle it and it’s really called lifestyle change.
And it Hass to be a permanent change. I can’t just be warm and do it for a week and I’m gonna get it for month and then that’s that
Look at the blue zones all the centurions who have made it above and beyond 100 years and you’re promising them 90 when they could live another 10 maybe 30 years without debility, being completely healthy and dying of natural state ? I don’t think that those types of addresses are correct. I don’t think that you should be playing Frankenstein with your DNA. I think that you should just learn more about it and support it and within reason don’t really stretch your imagination in the way of what you can get away with because technically you can’t, including this injection that you’re talking about.
Sarah people who have died from cancer, and there are people who have come back from the brink of death after receiving a diagnosis and traditional or western treatment for that cancer when the cancer was demonized and it was just a warning sign it was really problem and the cancer was telling you where that problem exist but instead of looking at it from that angle, people are like oh my God we have to destroy the cancer, which means you’re also destroying the body And well it’s the only place you have to live so your soul is going to have to go back to stores if you screw this up in an eye much earlier age than you would’ve hoped
Now, ironically people passed away at younger ages back in whatever year or decade or century Because they probably weren’t eating right they weren’t getting the right nutrients. They didn’t know much about the body either they took it for granted they lived hard lives. They worked hard, but the majority of the work wasn’t for someone else it was for maintaining their own life, and yet they were still very ill equipped, and under educated
The whole thing is really just a mystery as to how ignorant people can choose to be and yet ignorance is choice and we see it more today than ever we’re surrounded by seen and unseen causes of cancer, and it is what has been created by our society, our false beliefs the lies that we’ve bought therefore we were sold as slaves to the commercial and consumerism that everyone is under now, but I do think a lot of people are waking up and I’m very pleased about that because that means people will naturally live longer if they stop participating in all the reindeer games that is shortening their life and it’s what they call fools gold
When you say that people are living longer, they’re not living quality lives in this day and age and yet somehow you seem to be pretty proud of that thinking that vaccinations have actually helped. One fact they’ve actually contributed to people dying faster they’ve interfered with the immune system they’ve caused information they’ve caused damage to the mitochondria, which has intern caused death and disease as well as illness . You really shouldn’t play with your DNA
And that’s why so many natural doctors have been murdered if my memory serves it’s been over 2000 doctors they just either disappeared and later turned up dead or met some terrible fate.
There’s no accident in any of that the powers that be do not want people to believe they have Choice, and when someone is telling them the truth that person becomes a bull’s-eye
What you lovely scientists and doctors are learning and you’re also learning that that’s also a lie is nothing more than what someone wants you to believe and you do you adopt it you preach it, you practice it and then one day you have an awakening And you realize you’ve been playing on the wrong side of the team or you’re on the wrong team altogether and that’s where a lot of the weakening come with this whole virus crap where they blamed it on the virus the government was paying medical institutions to fraudulently claim that the deaths were attributed to virus, when you said they had underlying conditions, some of which contributed that was diagnosed and others, which were not even discovered Because there was a huge payoff like $14,000 per person and diagnosis was $1400 per person and God knows what else was going on nobody really believes in the CDC anymore. It’s a business just like the FDA it’s all about how much money they can make
They take bribes and they work for these companies who are extremely wealthy and who have an agenda they are so Dr. scientific reports and medical journals or those publications that end up in the journals so that people can be misled just like the Bible
I was curious to hear what the next billion dollar idea was that will rob people and give them false hope and also give them the ability to be enabled so they don’t have to take accountability for their life. They can just take your wealth and spend it on the shots . That way they can live forever and yet they wouldn’t be happy just we’re not designed to live forever.
So yeah, very interesting but I’ve heard is Lena matter how much money I have whatever be interested in it and I don’t recommend it for anyone. I don’t care how much money you have.
Loved the video. Thank you!!
Great info Thanks !!!
To Transition (aging) becomes an individuals Choice, etc..
Scientist please do something for the human kind.. Love from India..
im ok to never die, i dont need an ultimate meaning or to say it better i dont think there is an ultimate "something", the more we live the more normal it will become and more timespan we will ty to get (im looking at you turtles, we ARE coming)
I got hired at my present job at 60. Younger guys tend to have no upper body strength. The boxes when I run the scale weigh 40 pounds. My bar at home has 45, no problem.
As I understand it, fasting mimics effects like famines or lean winters, which causes the body to change in ways that increase survival, and those changes are passed down for a few generations through descendants.
Very interesting, I like the video. Thank you
Such a fantastic channel! Discussing aging and natural health is so important. Planet Ayurveda really helped me-can’t wait to share this with my neighbors!
We must not just consider the quantity of one's life, but its quality also.
The real question: can you afford to live 150 years? Does that mean we will have to work approx 100 years? What does this mean for female fertility - will ladies have a monthly period for 135 years (I hope not!)?
I don't know if I could emotionally live for 150 years... there's so much hardship, tragedy, suffering & cruelty in you world. Perhaps 70 years of living with the nonsense people get up to is quite enough, I don't think I could do it for 150 years!
I might consider it if I was wealthy and living in a world of peace, prosperity & sustainable living where everyone had a good life and the world co-operated to make a better world for all (everybody wins) rather than competing with each other (someone must win and the rest must lose so that the winner can feel superior). I don't like the world I live in now: living in it for 150 years is not an attractive prospect for me.
As answer to your proposal (ideology), I would propose that you have a look to a very instructive social experiment, that you may consult here: th-cam.com/video/NgGLFozNM2o/w-d-xo.html
Best wishes
@@corneliusbulik4856 Thanks for the link - I am familiar with ALL the issues raised. Some valid issues (people are capable of not being rats altho some aren't), some not so much any more. In a nutshell - it's complicated. Yes, population is growing (expected to peak at around 11 billion) in many parts of the world, but declining in others. But when we consider resource use (per capita consumption), it's the wealthy - not the poor - that are the biggest culprits. And if we look at history and who is responsible for economic, social & political manipulation on behalf of vested interests... again its the wealthy countries who are guilty (not to mention the catastrophic changes to our enviro, biodiversity & climate etc). The idea that the poor are responsible for all social ills is outdated & blatantly incorrect.
Being alive requires finances (quantity of life) as well as having a personal hope for the future (quality of life). Things are not looking good for most people right now. There are attempts to make development more equal & sustainable (2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development, Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, Habitat III, Beijing Declaration, UNCAC, Paris Agreement etc). If countries can live up to their obligations & commitments perhaps human society has a chance. There will always be richer & poorer people in the world, but being poorer should not mean "hell on Earth" - it's possible to be poorer financially but still enjoy a good quality of life (be healthy, have enough of the important things, enjoy quality relationships with family, friends, community & society, have hope for the future etc - the things that make life worth living).
I'll return the favour and send you some links.
@@corneliusbulik4856 What is a good life
th-cam.com/video/q-7zAkwAOYg/w-d-xo.html
@@corneliusbulik4856 Now the bad new - MIT has predicted that things will not go well for the human civilisation (and we're ahead of schedule)
th-cam.com/video/kVOTPAxrrP4/w-d-xo.html
You want to live for 150 to 200 years?
🥺 Star Trek references, love this 🥳
It's really interesting topic, well presentation and explanation
Depends on the mindset of the younger generations in which the aged are living perhaps to some minor or greater degree. Communal thought can greatly imprint reality. How discerning are these effects? Perhaps studies as to this nature could be dug up, or performed to this end somehow. Biochemical livelihood may be affected by this more than we currently know, or have been able to be aware of.
I'm pretty sure the 1% will be the only ones who get their lives extended, they pretty much already have the best available anti-aging and healthier lifestyle benefits than the rest of us. The movie Elysium is a good example that sums up how it will be in the future based on how it already is now.
Today everyone has powerful portable computers with an access to the internet. Anti-aging therapy will probably slowly become more available
Yeah that's nonsense. For most people extending life and health span by 10-15% would be a piece of cake if they only stuck to a healthy diet, regular movement and good sleep. Plus stuff like certain senoltytics, SIRTUIN activators etc. are pretty cheap and by that I mean I can afford them as a student on a small budget. EVOO, fish oil, D3 and brokkoli sprouts aren't a burden on a budget.
@@popelgruner595 People who don't have servants and personal chefs don't have the time or money to eat healthier and shop for, keep and cook fresh food 24/7.
They also can't afford proven to work anti-aging cosmetics/skin care and medicines which are only available to the wealthy to freely use regularly.
They don't have the best doctors or paid health professionals by their side keeping them in good health.
If all that were available to everyone, it would be a piece of cake but it's not!
Having a healthy lifestyle and good health isn't a choice. For most people it isn't even an option.
@@popelgruner595 have you ever heard of food deserts? in some areas of poverty within otherwise wealthy countries, it's actually cheaper to eat unhealthy food - and it gets addictive. poor people may also be even more tied down by long work hours and have no time to travel for healthier food, some don't even have the time or the spare capacity to think about that... until shit hits the fan and everything collapses.
the reality is that the rich only want the poor to live longer so they can work for more years and have their labour be exploited more. doesn't matter if they end up living unhealthy lives as long as they can show up to work. capitalism is about extracting maximum value without inflicting lethal damage. chronic health problems are also a profitable industry for big pharma and insurance. then there are those who prey on the poor, exhausted, and vulnerable - scammers, grifting politicians, special interest groups who want to blame it on migrants...
sooo. you watching tv all day merits your right to be where they are?
also if you turned off the tv to. learn the abc an 123 you could see alex jonessteinberg an this extented car warranty dealer lied to ya an they die bout the same time as everyone else
Ok. And when can I buy this in a drugstore????
Life extension is not unnatural nor does it take away your humanity. Will it make me happy? Yes because I’m alive, healthy, young/physically fit and beautiful.
What do you think of Bryan johnson
As science advances we will definitely solve this issue,and not only making aging nice,but there may be a way to reverse aging on a surface level now,but first we need find at the cellular level,and why we exist as we exist,then as this is solved then from there go into each phase aging and it’s reversal,as they can so now in mice to an extent,or what causes
living tissue to stop moving into growth and switch to stability or go in reverse.Itbwill take
some deep research,but we almost have the technology ready for this,and as some species
can regrow their missing tales,hold the key to our solution.
I'm getting really fed up of click bait titles
The future of aging is that the very rich with old fashioned self enriching attitudes live long and the rest can die for them, hoping to be allowed in their circle by treating other humans badly.
@ 1:01 The great escape, refers to 3 main factors and I would argue their is one far more important factor... plumbing
Unfortunately, the lifespan of people in the USA has been getting shorter over the past two decades.
Where do I sign up to immortality??
This is a 1:1 video of the veritassium channel I can't find it anymore.
If I can live to 150 or much longer, why not? As long I'm healthy full of energy and willing to live, why do I want to die? I think it will be awesome to start a new career at 100 years old, also get to experience new technologies for the future, there is also space traveling and new worlds to find, I think it will be awesome.
I like the editing, gives 90s vibes
Awesome video
I do research on senescence, and you have to be very very careful with these treatments, two drugs that work super well in other mouse tissues caused multiple sclerosis like symptoms in the brain.
And then live forever with it? Can of worms.