West coast player ran completely out of bounds and went on to score a goal. Todd Marshall managed to hit the exact top of the goal post Couple Farrell long bombs in that game too Did you forget about that game? Haha
boundary umpire had a throw recalled and then did a similar shit throw that was just called play on, 5 seconds later another throw in was called and the other boundary umpire came to throw it 😅 Also there was a mark about 55m from Ports goal that was questionably 50, depending who you go for, but when the ump said "no" he handballed it to Farrel and he bombed a goal from 60, but the umpire called it back for some reason and it resulted in a behind instead
5:45 not how holding the ball works. Check the rule book If he has no prior and makes a genuine attempt to dispose, it's not HTB. Whether he legally disposes or not. Way too many people who don't understand this rule and complain about calls or non-calls that are 100% correct
Yeah as a Cats fan on the night I thought it was HTB, but you've summed it up perfectly, geniune attempt by dropping it for a kick (he just got tackled as he got kicked) so it's not HTB
hundred percent correct here, i hear so many calls for HTB when I’m watching and theyre more or less like this, and when it doesnt get pinged (as it shouldnt) people are outraged
@@goldcoastsuns877 i think they need prior opportunity to get rid of it, as i guess if a person gets the ball and instantly tries to throw it on boot, but get tackled, theres not much else they couldve done, as the moment they had an opportunity to get rid of it, they actually tried to
Bull, you missed the Port vs West Coast game where a West Coast player clearly went out of bounds in the forward 50, yet faced no umpire call then proceeded to kick to his mate for a goal.
5:44 that's not holding the ball, the player has not had any prior opportunity, and the ball was knocked away in the tackle while the player was trying to dispose of the ball legitimately. If the player has taken any steps, or broken a tackle prior, then they've had prior opportunity, making it dropping the ball.
Yet he threw it into the middle of the ground rather than to the boundary...? good attempt trying to cover for him I guess? Also as Mr Holding-the-Bull points out Myers should know that it's a penalty for throwing away other player's possessions, we saw it heaps last year with trackers, goggles and even boots if I remember correctly
Im with you on the flop, they really should be more aware of them. Us aussies pride ourselves on not being like soccer where they flop all the time. Stamp that shit out and award a free kick. Bull
Surprised the free kick to Dangerfield when he dug his knees into Stocker wasn't mentioned. Stocker was clearly fighting to be first to the ball and didn't have any intention to specifically take out the legs, which is why the rule exists. Even the commentators thought the free was going the other way.
appreciate you calling out the maynard deliberate rushed behind thing not being called considering it was identical to what broad did last week yet broad was pinged. it’s never paid and it’s clear the umps haven’t decided to be more strict on it so the only difference i can spot is the yellow and black on the guernsey 🤷♂️ also that mansell miss is still gut wrenching 😭😭😭
From the rules (p.g. 55): "18.11.2 Free Kicks - Deliberate Rushed Behinds A field Umpire shall award a Free Kick against a Player from the Defending Team who intentionally Kicks, Handballs or forces the football over the Attacking Team’s Goal Line or Behind Line or onto one of the Attacking Team’s Goal Posts, and the Player: (a) is greater than nine metres from the Goal Line or Behind Line" The goal square extends 9m from the goal line and Maynard was in the goal square when he rushed it. Last week was the wrong call.
The problem with the 50m penalty now is it's completely disproportionate to the crime being committed. Situations like 4:10 where players are unfairly punished for barely even minor infractions and are given no opportunity to remedy their action. It happens at least once a game and more often than not gifts a team with a free goal and it's makes this great game look amateur. Solution: Remove the 'stand' rule and go back to what worked for, well, forever since the 50m penalty was introduced. Either that or reduce it to 25m because it's simply too punitive for the infraction it is.
I actually reckon that the stand rule is great... makes heaps of sense and IMO simplifies what was unnecessarily intricate. Also the 50m should be a tough penalty, I don't reckon that 25m is tough enough. Although I do agree their application of the 50m penalties isn't consistent or accurate enough
Not sure why Rowbottom’s run down of DeGoey wasn’t mentioned clear missed HtB. At the game Rowbottom acted on the umpires call, which was too quick but it was a reaction to the call.
4:13 Should the umpire have signaled time-on? Historically I feel when players lined up for goal, umpires would blow the whistle to stop the clock to prevent time wasting, and blow time back on just before the kick is taken.
Missed one in the Essendon vs Hawthorn game where Menzie has a set shot and shanks it badly, then the ball stays in and I think it was Amon shanks it straight back to Archie Perkins
The one at 4:00 has to be fifty as he definitely ran over the mark. Tom Green marked and had already taken a couple steps back from his mark, yet Curtis was able to catch up to him and stand right in front of him (i.e, he went over the mark). He can't be called back as he was not in the contest so it's a fifty.
good vid mate, there was a tackle on nick daicos by ollie florent and he through his head backwards into his lap after hed been taken to ground and it was called a high tackle, should that along with the sicily flop cop a fine?
1:20 absolute **bull** sh- not only was it not a 50m penalty, it wasn't a freekick, mark but instead a freekick for the other team. We need AI for umpires ngl
Mitch Owens is a great kick for goal on the run, not too sure about his set shot though so hopefully the Saints give him more time in the middle where he does his best work
The Sicily incident shouldn’t have been a free kick to Essendon anyway and a mark to Sicily. Umpires completely favoured Essendon the whole game. 100’s of oddities that game if it’s bad umpire decisions as they never paid holding the ball for us
@@ItsFalloutz yeah, but the better team didn’t win, Essendon were sloppy and ultimately the umpires won them the game, the only actual player on their team that played well was 2 metre Peter. They played sloppy and didn’t deserve shit
@@raccoonproductions7578 Stringer kicked 4 goals, McGrath had 33 disposals at 85% efficiency, Perkins had 24 disposals, 2 goals and 12 tackles. Essendon had 6/9 of the top players in disposals, the amount of mental gymnastics you're doing is incredible.
BULL! Man Ash Johnson about to be spending some quality time in the VFL. Playing like a spud so far. Nice to see the Pies looking ordinary. Magpies forever getting homeground advantage and never traveling.
Cripps just out here casually breaking the half marathon world record
and that's no joke
Man some of these calls were really bullheaded on behalf of the umpires
West coast player ran completely out of bounds and went on to score a goal.
Todd Marshall managed to hit the exact top of the goal post
Couple Farrell long bombs in that game too
Did you forget about that game? Haha
he's a crows fan what'd ya expect really
boundary umpire had a throw recalled and then did a similar shit throw that was just called play on, 5 seconds later another throw in was called and the other boundary umpire came to throw it 😅 Also there was a mark about 55m from Ports goal that was questionably 50, depending who you go for, but when the ump said "no" he handballed it to Farrel and he bombed a goal from 60, but the umpire called it back for some reason and it resulted in a behind instead
I was driving home from Adelaide so didn't get a chance to watch much of the port game. I had to listen on the radio.
so funny when the richmond bloke kicked the bull into the post from five out
5:45 not how holding the ball works. Check the rule book
If he has no prior and makes a genuine attempt to dispose, it's not HTB. Whether he legally disposes or not.
Way too many people who don't understand this rule and complain about calls or non-calls that are 100% correct
Yeah as a Cats fan on the night I thought it was HTB, but you've summed it up perfectly, geniune attempt by dropping it for a kick (he just got tackled as he got kicked) so it's not HTB
hundred percent correct here, i hear so many calls for HTB when I’m watching and theyre more or less like this, and when it doesnt get pinged (as it shouldnt) people are outraged
If the free kick was given though, wouldent it be for incorrect disposal, not HTB
@@goldcoastsuns877 i think they need prior opportunity to get rid of it, as i guess if a person gets the ball and instantly tries to throw it on boot, but get tackled, theres not much else they couldve done, as the moment they had an opportunity to get rid of it, they actually tried to
@@isaacmadhwan445 yeah true thanks
Bull, you missed the Port vs West Coast game where a West Coast player clearly went out of bounds in the forward 50, yet faced no umpire call then proceeded to kick to his mate for a goal.
Yeah I was hoping that would come up as well, the ball was about a metre out 🤯
5:44 wasn't a "missed" call, it simply isn't HTB as per footy laws.
exactly, tried to get rid of it as soon as he got it
Yeah exactly, no prior opportunity, genuine attempt to get rid of the ball, play on
@@ajexxan3415yeah it’s really concerning how many people don’t know this rule.
@@samysull333 been an umpire for 9 years including state league level and no matter where you go people will scream “ball” any chance they get
@@ajexxan3415 no a lot of people just don’t know the rule
Bro next weeks episode will be nuts haha. The Pies/Saints game alone has umps, out of bounds and a falcon. Love seeing pies lose
Bull :D Great content, as someone from the UK that just discovered Footy, I'm loving it!
5:44 that's not holding the ball, the player has not had any prior opportunity, and the ball was knocked away in the tackle while the player was trying to dispose of the ball legitimately.
If the player has taken any steps, or broken a tackle prior, then they've had prior opportunity, making it dropping the ball.
Bull! Absolutely love watching your videos, keep up the great work!!
Egg footy vs holding the bull lets goooo. BULL
Grian Myers threw away the boot because it was an obstruction and a hazard.
Yet he threw it into the middle of the ground rather than to the boundary...? good attempt trying to cover for him I guess? Also as Mr Holding-the-Bull points out Myers should know that it's a penalty for throwing away other player's possessions, we saw it heaps last year with trackers, goggles and even boots if I remember correctly
Yeah fair enough@@reubengammon9937 👍
Im with you on the flop, they really should be more aware of them. Us aussies pride ourselves on not being like soccer where they flop all the time. Stamp that shit out and award a free kick. Bull
Surprised the free kick to Dangerfield when he dug his knees into Stocker wasn't mentioned. Stocker was clearly fighting to be first to the ball and didn't have any intention to specifically take out the legs, which is why the rule exists. Even the commentators thought the free was going the other way.
@@TomMarvan cry more 🤣
LETS GOOO, I missed this content so much I’m so happy AFL is back
appreciate you calling out the maynard deliberate rushed behind thing not being called considering it was identical to what broad did last week yet broad was pinged. it’s never paid and it’s clear the umps haven’t decided to be more strict on it so the only difference i can spot is the yellow and black on the guernsey 🤷♂️ also that mansell miss is still gut wrenching 😭😭😭
From the rules (p.g. 55):
"18.11.2 Free Kicks - Deliberate Rushed Behinds
A field Umpire shall award a Free Kick against a Player from the Defending Team who
intentionally Kicks, Handballs or forces the football over the Attacking Team’s Goal Line
or Behind Line or onto one of the Attacking Team’s Goal Posts, and the Player:
(a) is greater than nine metres from the Goal Line or Behind Line"
The goal square extends 9m from the goal line and Maynard was in the goal square when he rushed it.
Last week was the wrong call.
@@yar1that’s not how it works but i agree it was definitely the wrong call with broad and the right call with maynard.
The problem with the 50m penalty now is it's completely disproportionate to the crime being committed. Situations like 4:10 where players are unfairly punished for barely even minor infractions and are given no opportunity to remedy their action. It happens at least once a game and more often than not gifts a team with a free goal and it's makes this great game look amateur.
Solution: Remove the 'stand' rule and go back to what worked for, well, forever since the 50m penalty was introduced. Either that or reduce it to 25m because it's simply too punitive for the infraction it is.
also, BULL
I actually reckon that the stand rule is great... makes heaps of sense and IMO simplifies what was unnecessarily intricate. Also the 50m should be a tough penalty, I don't reckon that 25m is tough enough.
Although I do agree their application of the 50m penalties isn't consistent or accurate enough
Bring back the 15 metre penalty for small infringements…
I love it when Collingwood goes Owen 3 and always miss the BULL
8:29 i was at that game and short not only kicked the bull from 60 but against the wind
where are the clips from dees vs dogs? i mean surely there was at least 1 thing odd that happened in the game
Hey man great stuff love seeing you and you quality grow keep up the good work
bull
9:05 the marker, Crazy your doing my boy george like that
I’m shocked how little hawks clips there are, this is Bull
My 3rd wife reckons the Markov call was because it was touched off the boot, on the previous kick.
Bull:) Great vid mate. Go Dons! 🎉
GC absolutely bullied the crows until the 4th quarter! thats my oddity for this week.
Not sure why Rowbottom’s run down of DeGoey wasn’t mentioned clear missed HtB.
At the game Rowbottom acted on the umpires call, which was too quick but it was a reaction to the call.
these calls had some bulls angry
4:13 Should the umpire have signaled time-on? Historically I feel when players lined up for goal, umpires would blow the whistle to stop the clock to prevent time wasting, and blow time back on just before the kick is taken.
im exited to see luke pedlar play this season, he is an absolute bull
I just subbed to both you and egg on the same day lol
Missed one in the Essendon vs Hawthorn game where Menzie has a set shot and shanks it badly, then the ball stays in and I think it was Amon shanks it straight back to Archie Perkins
*biggest falcon youve ever seen till the st.kilda collingwood game lol
That one West Coast goal was absolutely bull. The ball was outside of the boundary by at least a whole metre
Bull ❤
Bull❤
Ball I watched the end up the bangers
the one with markov was play on because it was touched
Last week, the player had the ball outside the square. This one with Maynard was in the square.
Still should have been paid deliberate under the current laws of the sport... weird decision.
The one at 4:00 has to be fifty as he definitely ran over the mark. Tom Green marked and had already taken a couple steps back from his mark, yet Curtis was able to catch up to him and stand right in front of him (i.e, he went over the mark). He can't be called back as he was not in the contest so it's a fifty.
That Brisbane goal call was bull!
You're allowed to drop the ball of you're in the middle of kicking it. Umpire changed that rule about 4 years ago.
Did you see D'goey clap at Ash Johnson when he shanked it? Funny as
What’s your favourite animal?? Mine would have to be a bull
good vid mate, there was a tackle on nick daicos by ollie florent and he through his head backwards into his lap after hed been taken to ground and it was called a high tackle, should that along with the sicily flop cop a fine?
that 50m call on Baker was pretty bull in my opinion
Idk how how the Tiges lost that game, absolute bull
Maybe do your footy tips next week for some extra content
As a saints fan, Rowan Marshall was defo holding the bull.
5:16, he clearly handballed it champ
10:00 probably not a 50 as it's in the middle of play, where it could be considered a hazard. Also I believe it was Charlie Cameron, no?
I'm normally a cricket fan, but I've gotten pretty into this sport, really nice. Go Queensland BULLS!
This week mad bull Serong broke Freo's highest ever disposal count in a game (44) by getting 46 disposals
the rule should be that you have to mark it one handed off the flying fox camera
missed peter wright fumbling a bounce after getting a 50m free his way
the oleg one is crazy
1:20 absolute **bull** sh- not only was it not a 50m penalty, it wasn't a freekick, mark but instead a freekick for the other team. We need AI for umpires ngl
Bro I remember when me and my brother st the start of this series would binge him and would die because we had to wait a week😂 (Pin)❤
all these players really grabbed the bull by the horns this week
in sicily's defence how would you like to be harassed by the whole essendon foward line
Curnow messed with the bull and copped the horns.
Sicily looks like he is turning into a bull
What about curnow getting stood on his face that was crazy
Who is everyone favourite Ball magnet?
I like Holding the Bull
You’re way better than egg footy ball!!
i think this is such a good video should they get a new bull
Mitch Owens is a great kick for goal on the run, not too sure about his set shot though so hopefully the Saints give him more time in the middle where he does his best work
a kick is a kick suspension should not have been overturned
Big Bull
rowan marshall was not holding the ball. might want to learn the rules on that one
Huge bulls on me
Did you forget Port played? Blatant Crows bias
The lions losing was bull
BULLLLL
You got this BULL you can get to ten thousand before eggfooty
I like footbull
Did you miss the port vs eagles game cause there where quite a few "interesting" calls to say the least
love it
Should of been holding the bull
BALL
Bull, great vid :)
I wish that Richmond are first not 18
Pies v swans should have been better I’d rather watch a bull meow
Bull :D new sub !
Did anyone watch Melbourne dogs play 8 score reviews only two changed anything and only 4 were needed there also five in the FIRST QUARTER WTF
Hi you are the best
Bull. Love these videos keep it up
The Sicily incident shouldn’t have been a free kick to Essendon anyway and a mark to Sicily. Umpires completely favoured Essendon the whole game. 100’s of oddities that game if it’s bad umpire decisions as they never paid holding the ball for us
I'm sure kicking 11.17 had nothing to do with the loss...
@@ItsFalloutz it did, though half of Essendon did scoring shots came from dodgy free kicks
@@raccoonproductions7578 Hawthorn got mauled in centre clearances and were inaccurate in front of goal, the better team won on the day.
@@ItsFalloutz yeah, but the better team didn’t win, Essendon were sloppy and ultimately the umpires won them the game, the only actual player on their team that played well was 2 metre Peter. They played sloppy and didn’t deserve shit
@@raccoonproductions7578 Stringer kicked 4 goals, McGrath had 33 disposals at 85% efficiency, Perkins had 24 disposals, 2 goals and 12 tackles. Essendon had 6/9 of the top players in disposals, the amount of mental gymnastics you're doing is incredible.
Jayden short is my cousin
Bull!
Bull😂
what if i like egg footy and u
Then you can just love us both 😂
BULL! Man Ash Johnson about to be spending some quality time in the VFL. Playing like a spud so far. Nice to see the Pies looking ordinary. Magpies forever getting homeground advantage and never traveling.
Ball
BULL
This video is BULL! jk great stuff
bull
ball
Bull