The Hidden Truth: How EVs Impact Our Environment | Electric Vehicles & Its Production Challenges

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 31

  • @HighwayHerald
    @HighwayHerald  หลายเดือนก่อน

    🔍 Did you know some used EVs hide costly secrets? 🤔
    Uncover the truth behind buying used EVs NOW! ➡ th-cam.com/video/NOI9GJn12vU/w-d-xo.html

  • @gpsfinancial6988
    @gpsfinancial6988 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Fun fact cobalt is used to refine oil but is not used in LFP batteries used in most new EVs.

    • @st-ex8506
      @st-ex8506 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Correct! Actually, “contestable provenance “ is not used in ANY EV, not a single gram!
      All manufacturers using cobalt for consumer products are watching their supply chain with an hawk’s eye to avoid any possible scandal. All cobalt of shady provenance (and about 7% is indeed) finds its way into non-branded industrial products, such as special steels and, yes, catalysts used to refine oil.
      This video is nothing but disinformation!

    • @st-ex8506
      @st-ex8506 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Correct!
      Actually, not a single gram of cobalt of questionable provenance is finding its way into EV batteries!
      Manufacturers are keeping an eagle’s eye on their supply chain on the topic to avoid any possible scandal.
      The cobalt of shady provenance (and it is true there is around 7% of it) finds its way into non-branded industrial products, such as special steels… or the catalysts used to refine oil!
      This video is nothing but disinformation!

  • @GWAForUTBE
    @GWAForUTBE หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Tesla does not use Congo Cobalt
    Your phone , laptop tablet certainly does

  • @raymondgray4268
    @raymondgray4268 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "It takes a worried man to sing a worried song." The oil industry is now desperate!

  • @johnpublic168
    @johnpublic168 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    A bit dated. It was true 20 years ago. But currently on some days in california 100% of electricity is from renewables.

  • @thereplacementfordisplacement
    @thereplacementfordisplacement หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Dirty power plants actually generates and distributes electricity more efficiently than all but the most efficient gasoline cars can burn it. Today's EVs are just the bottom end of efficieny, they will only get better and better unlike ICE vehicles which only get more and more extreme to make same efficiency improvements.

    • @skylershank9309
      @skylershank9309 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Aren't 'dirty' power plants regulated by the EPA? Don't they have to meet clean air standards?

    • @thereplacementfordisplacement
      @thereplacementfordisplacement หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@skylershank9309 some dirty power plants operate under tighter regulations than others. Dirty to me is anything other than Solar and Wind. Both the renewable options have some dirt on their hands but that's in production or end of life recycling, they more than make up for it during their power production lifetime.

  • @TraderJff
    @TraderJff หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The electric power grid needs updating even if there were no EVs. The aging electric infrastructure is not caused by EVs. Energy demands increase year over year regardless. If anything EVs are exposing and accelerating invest in our grid.

  • @lubosklech102
    @lubosklech102 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Hello 2014 :) these informations are just rubbish in current world :(

  • @st-ex8506
    @st-ex8506 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Modern EV batteries can last for half a million or even a million of miles. Can most ICE engines?
    It is so true that MG is starting to offer vehicle lifetime, transferable, battery warranty on a number of their products.
    In general, batteries last much longer than all but the most pampered ICE engines!

  • @z.z.onichi5365
    @z.z.onichi5365 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    oil industry is far far worse just do some actual research over the last 100 years all the damage done.
    EVs do pose new challenges, but they can be work around with new manufacturing and continuous improvement, EVs is a better alternative with room for improvement.

  • @z.z.onichi5365
    @z.z.onichi5365 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    simple question to answer all these facts
    is EVs worse the ICE cars for the planet?
    i doubt it. lol

  • @st-ex8506
    @st-ex8506 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Even if electricity was 100% coal generated (which is the case in NO country, anywhere in the world) EVs would still be less carbon intensive over their lifetime… by a considerable margin.
    With the US average carbon intensity, the carbon debt incurred by EVs for the manufacturing of their battery, is paid off after 15-30’000 miles… 1-2 years of driving!

  • @st-ex8506
    @st-ex8506 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Btw, is the extraction of the 20-30 tons of oil an ICE car will burn in its life environmentally innocuous. BTW, if battery materials can be most efficiently recycled, for about 30% of the cost of the primary metals, how much of the burned gasoline can be recycled!
    The bad faith of this video is simply astounding!

  • @st-ex8506
    @st-ex8506 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does EV manufacturing entails supply chain issues! You bet! So does securing oil supply.. wars have been fought for that!
    No war was yet fought over lithium or nickel, as far as I know!

  • @st-ex8506
    @st-ex8506 หลายเดือนก่อน

    EV batteries must be replaced prematurely LESS OFTEN than ICE engines do!

  • @st-ex8506
    @st-ex8506 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Current recycling battery methods recover 95-99% of the metals.
    Another lie of this video!

  • @ruicosta3855
    @ruicosta3855 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is hydrogen more clean?

    • @richardbambenek2601
      @richardbambenek2601 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I don't want our roads filled with Hindenburgs Extracting hydrogen from water is energy intensive

    • @ruicosta3855
      @ruicosta3855 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@richardbambenek2601 Just wanted to know if is cleaner bro

    • @richardbambenek2601
      @richardbambenek2601 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ruicosta3855 Very clean almost complete combustion but at this time not the answer to green utopia