$30 Casio = 600ft Under Water?!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ต.ค. 2022
  • Patreon: patreon.com/wristswap
    Channel Membership:
    / @harrisonelmore
    Casio A158WA is rated for 30 Meter water resistance, but it can do much more than that. Today we test out the theory of water resistance and what it means. Is it just splash proof or is it more than that?
    Thanks to ISO 22810 that is on all modern watches, 30M really means 30M unless the gaskets degrade over time. This Casio took a heck of a lot more than that to finally break.
    The CASIO I Used: amzn.to/3VTfWFx
    Inexpensive Depth Tank: amzn.to/3gqxWqo
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Website: www.wristswap.com
    Instagram: / wrist_swap
    My Day Job: bit.ly/3Cy9ta4
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Stuff I Use:
    Primary Camera: amzn.to/3VW521z
    Secondary Camera: amzn.to/3TNBO3k
    Macro Lens: amzn.to/3DqMob7
    Tripod Head: amzn.to/3MXBYTr
    Tripod Body: amzn.to/3D0Beby
    Video Storage:amzn.to/3N15kAm
    Floating Bulb in Background: amzn.to/3gDAZeT
    Directional Microphone: amzn.to/3DntuSq
    Lighting Kit: amzn.to/3TxkTSH
    (2) Of These 128GB SD Cards: amzn.to/3SxmBlP
    Watchmaking Tools:
    Bergeon Screwdriver Set Ergonomic: amzn.to/3spLVj4
    Bergeon Matt: amzn.to/3SyFZ1I
    Bergeon SpringBar Tool: amzn.to/3eWJNfu
    Bergeon Case Opening Ball: amzn.to/3gplHdF
    Bergeon Rodico: amzn.to/3VPmULL
    George Daniels Watchmaking Book: amzn.to/3TIg9JW

ความคิดเห็น • 343

  • @HarrisonElmore
    @HarrisonElmore  ปีที่แล้ว +131

    As a note: ISO22810 is the spec all watches have to meet. Dress watches up to dive watches. It’s designed to address ambiguity of water resistance in ‘watches, so yes, your watch meets those specific depths. Obviously most of us aren’t comfortable trying it, but they are. 🎉

    • @johnw6613
      @johnw6613 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      hey man could you do the same test with a timex weekender i dont have faith there build quality will stand up to the 30 m wr rating

    • @yosuhimekawa9053
      @yosuhimekawa9053 ปีที่แล้ว

      Even the vintage ones?

    • @user-gj1tf6hf9o
      @user-gj1tf6hf9o 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yosuhimekawa9053no, also seals will age and deteriorate causing the wr to lower

    • @spencergeorge4941
      @spencergeorge4941 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@yosuhimekawa9053I think he meant to say all watches that are marked as water resistant (which is a vast majority of them). There are, of course, many watches that aren’t water resistant, or aren’t tested to the ISO spec, but may have some resistance anyway despite not being labeled as such.

    • @TheChzoronzon
      @TheChzoronzon 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Dude... you REALLY have a problem with counting... and with coherence and safety: "the tank is rated for 100m, and I don't want it to explode in my face", then you proceed to go DOUBLE that while putting your eyes super close...
      What a champ :D

  • @ambientblue-eyedmonkey8849
    @ambientblue-eyedmonkey8849 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    2:39 you're 40 meters down below trapped and about to run out of oxygen and your casio watch beeps to tell you it's 11 o'clock.

  • @e28forever30
    @e28forever30 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +193

    Casio delivers.
    No BS, no fancy talk, just down to earth, affordable quality stuff.
    Love it.

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Couldn't agree more!

    • @Drownedinblood
      @Drownedinblood 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I wish more companies were like casio....taking something traditionally luxury and making it available for everyone and super durable.

  • @barryvercueil2346
    @barryvercueil2346 ปีที่แล้ว +616

    This video just convinced 100 people to buy a Casio. They owe you commission man!!!!

    • @nkonig1
      @nkonig1 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Yep. Proof that they live up to their God Tier status! I think this gives me confidence to wear mine a little rougher now.

    • @user-iw2mo7yu4d
      @user-iw2mo7yu4d ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Jokes on you I already own 1😂

    • @techmadgeek
      @techmadgeek ปีที่แล้ว +11

      101...I'm on the way to the shop now.

    • @Walter_Sobchak_43
      @Walter_Sobchak_43 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Maybe because they are so affordable, but I usually take my Casio swimming instead of my actual dive watches. Never had a problem. 😅😂

    • @rasellink6875
      @rasellink6875 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂😂😂

  • @shawnlavigne9069
    @shawnlavigne9069 ปีที่แล้ว +365

    I'm surprised. I knew it could go the full 30. But 200 is incredible.

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  ปีที่แล้ว +34

      I was not expecting it either!

    • @philipcooper8297
      @philipcooper8297 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      No need to be surprised. It's 30m in real life conditions, such as washing hands and swimming. The resistance of water while you swim puts way more pressure on the watch case than when you just let it sit in a tank like that.

    • @TheChzoronzon
      @TheChzoronzon 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      ​@@philipcooper8297 I doubt very, very much that the most violent swimming movements could account for even one more atmosphere of pressure, not even close...and he went 17 more
      Do you have any link or study that says that swimming movements can produce such forces?

    • @philipcooper8297
      @philipcooper8297 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TheChzoronzon Do you understand hydrodynamics?

    • @gjeraldh2989
      @gjeraldh2989 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@philipcooper8297 i don't, it would be helpful if you could elaborate.

  • @jacobduran8997
    @jacobduran8997 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +116

    I had no idea it could go down to such depths below sea level and still function as intended! One of the reason why I will forever trust Casio's brand!

    • @arpanmahapatra342
      @arpanmahapatra342 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      You'd be dead before the watch

    • @jacobduran8997
      @jacobduran8997 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@arpanmahapatra342 I have no plans on going into such depths myself. I just think it's cool that it can resist such high pressure.

    • @Bljat69
      @Bljat69 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@arpanmahapatra342if you loose casio watch and find it after 10 years it will still have like half the battery. My is still working after 5 years on cheapest battery you can find

    • @Unlucky1776
      @Unlucky1776 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@arpanmahapatra342that’s true as well because it is a quartz watch so it’ll probab outlast us all

    • @randomcow505
      @randomcow505 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      friend of mines f91w got it in the screen by a police training paint marker round and survived, the plastic cover was fucked up, but you could still see the watch ticking away
      the marker rounds are no joke either, one of them tore straight through the webbing on my hand.
      we also found one that had been buried for god knows how long in the dirt in a 10cm deep muddy puddle, only reason we found it was because the fucking alarm went off and we got bollocked for having alarms set 😂

  • @TheFailingBoat
    @TheFailingBoat ปีที่แล้ว +73

    I go surfing in the north sea almost every week and I always wear the same f91w while surfing for at least 7 years now, and it is still going strong.

    • @3vamtb
      @3vamtb 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I use the same, but for mountaineering since 2014 and it still works like day 1.

    • @yashrajsrgm
      @yashrajsrgm 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      And people right here saying "I want sea master just for my swimming!" Lol

    • @Unlucky1776
      @Unlucky1776 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yashrajsrgmI mean I want a seamaster regardless

    • @jackjackmillar
      @jackjackmillar 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In Scotland?

    • @yashrajsrgm
      @yashrajsrgm 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Unlucky1776 bro 💀 it's your choice anyways. For some people like me, watch is just a tool and if $30 gets me what I want, then why not 🤷‍♂️

  • @Makul-rt4sz
    @Makul-rt4sz ปีที่แล้ว +42

    I had casio rated as WR(lowest rating) only, wich means good enough for washing hands only..I used it for swimming for years and never had any issues with it..casio's are capable far more then they claim

  • @deepfinds
    @deepfinds 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    As a keen metal detector enthusiast, I've found dozens of wrist watches in the ocean. From $1 to $1800 watches. The ONLY, and I mean literally, the only watches that ever survive the roughest surf conditions are Casio watches. They are unkillable. They can be slammed on rocks, buries meters below sand and tumbled for years and not die. I found one last night with a flat battery, been there at least a few years. I guarantee it'll work with a new battery. lol

    • @adrian_certified
      @adrian_certified 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did it work??

    • @deepfinds
      @deepfinds 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yep lmao@@adrian_certified

    • @damyr
      @damyr 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Does it work?

  • @matthewblome6547
    @matthewblome6547 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    I have been diving in the Red Sea with exactly that Casio down to 40m. No problems, also years later. I have also dived with a F91W down to the same depths, also no problems. Wish I had the confidence in my other 30m WR watches. It is so confusing to consumers, as dress watches that are 30m WR cannot possibly do that

    • @predragjo5977
      @predragjo5977 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I'd say that the case material contributes a lot to WR. Its made of resin and the resin compresses under the pressure.

    • @noisepuppet
      @noisepuppet ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I've been wondering if pushing the buttons at that depth could let some water in. Do you use the buttons at depth?

    • @dnichl
      @dnichl 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@noisepuppetit will let water in for sure. it's just a few o rings that fit around the buttons. at that depth it would unseat, let out the air and not seal again. never operate buttons under water. same goes for water resistance rated physical phone buttons.

    • @dnichl
      @dnichl 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      reminds me of a video where somebody put their f91w on a cruise ship anchor or fishing net or something at let it go down 100m+. came back fully functional with zero water ingress.

  • @ignaciopadilla5150
    @ignaciopadilla5150 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Great video! Thank you for sacrificing a God Tier watch in proof that Casio 30m water resistance over passes its statement. Other fancy and expensive watches that claim 30m you can barely wash your hands with them. You showed this Casio did not just surpassed its WR ratings but also was submerged in water for a long period of time.

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Agreed! It was far better than I expected.

  • @timemeasured9137
    @timemeasured9137 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    If you’re gonna go digital go Casio!!!! Can’t go wrong. We all need at least one digital in the collection.

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Agreed!

    • @rhdtv2002
      @rhdtv2002 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      One?😊

    • @hehehexpresso
      @hehehexpresso 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Only one? You need them all!

    • @Loneace85
      @Loneace85 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I have at least 5 digitals 😂

  • @huckinator
    @huckinator ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This was an awesome showcase! One watch that comes to mind is the Hamilton khaki king. I own one and never once have ever thought about 50m of water resistance being too little. Then you watch a review of it and that’s on almost all of the negatives list for it. I think crazy water resistance requirements for a watch to be “good” is ridiculous.

  • @michaeldemarillac9992
    @michaeldemarillac9992 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I went diving for my yacht mooring while wearing my CASIO - W800H-1AV | Black Digital Watch. I bought it when a guy said this was all he needed when travelling around Australia. The only reason I don't wear it diving anymore is because I had a crazy elevator door in Malaysia, close on my wrist watch and it ripped one of the holes holding the strap spring bar. It could pop out at any time and fall of my wrist now. Best watch I had ever owned.

  • @ianmaw66
    @ianmaw66 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    If it's like G-shocks I opened the back is holds the buzzer so it is not surprising that the buzzer stopped when you removed the back. There is often a tiny spring which makes electrical contact. Excellent video, thanks.

  • @TheGrenadier97
    @TheGrenadier97 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Safe pressure rating on the vintage 30m Casios is definitely deeper than what's stated, and i don't think most other brands have that same degree of reliability. It's as if Casio deliberately overbuilt the resistance. However, i've always thought that digital quartz are inherently more robust; i'm curious as to how analogs like MQ-24 and MTP-1095 (a dress watch) can hold against pressure.

    • @Bljat69
      @Bljat69 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sony. They lower their specs soo much on paper

  • @dtuk22
    @dtuk22 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I Love this....proof that a $30 watch is better than ridiculously expensive watches. I couldn't fine a direct comparison but thats a greater depth than two Statue of Libertys stacked.

    • @fuckgoogle6091
      @fuckgoogle6091 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So water resistance is the only metric to judge a watch on?🤣

    • @fuckgoogle6091
      @fuckgoogle6091 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So the James Cameron deep sea Rolex is the best watch ever made by taht logic 🤡

  • @deatheater4805
    @deatheater4805 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Holy shit... I bought this same watch a week ago. Little did i know this is some god tier stuff🙌

  • @GottaGeek
    @GottaGeek 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

    There's a very good chance the beeping stopped when you removed the back plate, because the back plate contains the speaker. Which just happens to look like a sticker.

    • @SidBonkers51
      @SidBonkers51 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I didnt know that, thanx.

    • @GottaGeek
      @GottaGeek 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@SidBonkers51 there's a little Golden spring that goes through the movement and kind of pokes out to be able to touch the backplate when it's in place so it could also be a missing or bent spring

    • @Marin_Sp
      @Marin_Sp 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's piezo speaker.

    • @GottaGeek
      @GottaGeek 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @MarinSperanda I know but most don't so I usually refer to it by just stating that it's a speaker.

  • @MyVideosWillCalmU
    @MyVideosWillCalmU ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This was crazy interesting 😅...been subbed a while, you make some excellent content. This was fun.👌🏾

  • @wastedaga1n
    @wastedaga1n ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Fantastic video! Excellent work. Great job.

  • @alignedguide6553
    @alignedguide6553 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I'm the type of person to take off my G-Shock while washing hands and he's out here simulating scuba diving with one of their cheapest watches, really made me think

    • @StardustLegacyFighter
      @StardustLegacyFighter 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wtf dude, nobody I know takes off their mechanical watches when washing their hands, let alone a G-Shock.

  • @dmc6617
    @dmc6617 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I don t think that every push of the lever equals to 2m as being a constant in this experiment. It may be that with the rising preassure, every lever push would provide less and less additional preassure as the air density inside the glass chamber rises. You should have used an actual gage with sufficient measuring capabilities for your experiment. On the other hand is clear that the little Casio behaved admirably and got well beyond its rating. But i don t think the high depth numbers are accurate in this experiment, unfortunately. I m 90% sure that the rate of preasure increasing per one lever pull is not a constant variable. Good luck!

  • @General_Mills_
    @General_Mills_ 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The caseback is used as the resonator for the piezo (beep), so it has to be assembled for it to work. You can actually delete the beep by putting a piece of tape on the inside of the caseback before reassembly.

  • @recon9640
    @recon9640 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Best watch for the money. I've owned many casios, never had one single issue. Good video

  • @connorhaggett9668
    @connorhaggett9668 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    “I want to get the watch to break before the tank does” Casio is the best

  • @techmadgeek
    @techmadgeek ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Beeper requires case back to function. You will probably find beeps will return if you were the replace case back.Great Video, thanks for posting.

  • @nojburns
    @nojburns 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I believe the watch stopped beeping because you took off the case back. There is a very thin speaker on the inside of Casio case backs. This is electrified by a small spring that comes out of the movement and connects to the speaker. If the spring is still in the movement (they're very easy to lose) and you put the case back back on, I'm certain the speaker would continue to produce your beep.

  • @brett233
    @brett233 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I’ve seen stuff like this before and I’d be confident taking any Casio with at least 30m WR swimming. Mostly because they are cheap, I wouldn’t take that risk with any expensive mechanical watch with less than 100m of WR.

  • @a.m.7739
    @a.m.7739 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    That’s pretty incredible. Do it with you explorer now!! Kidding. Great work. Keep it up, sir

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hahaha I’ll get right on that! I’m sure I could explain that to the insurance company!

    • @mojaal
      @mojaal ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@HarrisonElmore No risk if you test it with just the case and crystal. Take the movement and dial out

  • @markloubser2433
    @markloubser2433 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Got to hand it to Casio! Ive been diving with a Duro for years, no issues. Wouldnt want to do it with my more expensive watches...

  • @badumskee2012
    @badumskee2012 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Could you try this with the Casio W86? I'm very curious as its basically a modern and better version of the F91 while still keeping that charming movement in addition to the upgraded light

  • @RedEye737
    @RedEye737 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    When you think you know casio, it just reminds you it's the opposite. Awesome video man

  • @denniskai2331
    @denniskai2331 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Video!!!

  • @RelojesYRelojes
    @RelojesYRelojes ปีที่แล้ว

    love your videos man!

  • @funkmonkeyfun
    @funkmonkeyfun ปีที่แล้ว +7

    One of my beater watches is my favorite F91w, after years I still swim with it, fish with it take steaming hot showers and I have never had condensation or water penetration, tough little watch. I have had a ton of 50 meter water resistance watch like armatron fail in a pool or shower.

  • @mattkinsella9856
    @mattkinsella9856 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I just left a comment on another watch video saying that although I own a range of watches, some quite rare and expensive, I often just put on one of my Casio watches because they are great for everyday use and I never stress about them because they are almost indestructible and even if I did damage it, then I can replace it with the cash in my pocket. This video just proves my point but to the extreme!

  • @mikel.laughridge9480
    @mikel.laughridge9480 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks for this. I just got me a Casio A168W 5 days ago. Nice to know this informaton.

  • @nancybasel
    @nancybasel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My Casio peeped at the hour mark just seconds before yours and when I heard yours I was preplaxed why my watch peeped twice 😂😂

  • @mickmouse3513
    @mickmouse3513 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting video 👍👍

  • @christopherjohnson4276
    @christopherjohnson4276 ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely tough as nails. I'm never afraid to get my Casio's wet, they're just amazing. ❤

  • @Bigfish1day
    @Bigfish1day ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Casio watches are really better than people think. I have a G-Shock solar that has been working for 14 years, I daily wore it for 13 years so far.

    • @e28forever30
      @e28forever30 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I own a 15 year old Riseman, which still charges and syncs perfectly.
      Awesome watches.

    • @badd.syntaxx
      @badd.syntaxx หลายเดือนก่อน

      hi how was the tough solar power? is it still high? or did ypi managed to changed its rechargeable battery?

  • @graveyardz56
    @graveyardz56 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Apple : *throwing tantrum at 40m*
    Casio : 'hey man it's 11 am'

  • @iihchindiiko
    @iihchindiiko 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have similar variant that I used for more than a decade. It was tortured so much that the front was scrapped from bailing in asphalt. now I have my gshock for 6yrs. I mean the way I wore my watch. I only remove it when I take bath. hahaha I do labor work, chemicals, bailing from skate and longboard, swimming, sometime hitting on steel corners when at site. That's the same reason why I prefer casio than an expensive watch that decreases the value if I use it the same way. 😅

  • @ashy5474
    @ashy5474 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was an awesome watch, thanks!

  • @TechTokOffical
    @TechTokOffical 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The only reason the "beep" stopped when u took the back off was because the lil round thing that looks like a sticker on the inside of the case IS the beep "speaker." There is either a spring stickin out the back of the module or a piece of metal connected to the module makes the circuit connection complete

  • @Loveisalongroad
    @Loveisalongroad 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent video

  • @carlosmanuelvillalobossant6918
    @carlosmanuelvillalobossant6918 ปีที่แล้ว

    So interesting! Great video

  • @MikoYotsuya292
    @MikoYotsuya292 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Doing this experiment, near all your expensive gadgets. not only that, without any form of safety equipment! Respect! 😱😱😱

  • @sorinbunea471
    @sorinbunea471 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing, i just order this Casio watch today after seeing this video..a lot of value for the money

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed! Wildly capable little watch

  • @droobie827
    @droobie827 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This would be a cool test to try on a cheap seiko 5 or even better Ali express dive watches

  • @tennbones
    @tennbones 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Enjoyed your video, I am wearing that same $20 Casio as I type this. Casio is leaps and bounds better than any other watch brand. It ceases to amaze me. Good demonstration!

  • @augustocanosa785
    @augustocanosa785 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So, basically any casio is a diver watch lol. Good video, dude

  • @thisisnothere14
    @thisisnothere14 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'd love to see you test the mrw200h and see how far that can go!

  • @Tech101yt
    @Tech101yt 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    seriously impressive, it outlasted the rated depth of a g-shock!

  • @Aetila
    @Aetila 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Impressive test...thanks for the excellent demo!
    I wonder if other cheap brands can behave so well like this, like Skmei - 30 m ?

  • @hansolo1367
    @hansolo1367 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great video bro, you might want to buy a good quality safety googles for similar tests in future.

  • @MrCarguy427
    @MrCarguy427 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting video! I was worried about surfing with my Casio. Not anymore

  • @pierrearagon
    @pierrearagon ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Wow, that is incredible. I had an suspicion that it would go beyond the WR rating but I didn’t think it would be that much.
    Now I’m curious if applies to just their resin cases or if the metal cases (A1000 series) would perform similarly.

    • @willegalvao9109
      @willegalvao9109 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They are basically the same. This entry level metal casios are made of resin with a special paint on it.

    • @drfat
      @drfat 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@willegalvao9109a1000 is fully stainless steel, not chrome-plated resin as a158, a168, etc.

    • @e28forever30
      @e28forever30 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@willegalvao9109
      The A1000 has a metal case, as the OP stated.

  • @thomashuller8099
    @thomashuller8099 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video very well done. I know why I've been wearing Casio and G-Shock watches for 30 years.

  • @abdullahshaik7673
    @abdullahshaik7673 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you bhai for this information

  • @franco05
    @franco05 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow awsome test

  • @ArcticSeraph
    @ArcticSeraph ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Makes me wonder how much the Casio A1000 can take since the crystal is mineral glass and not resin

  • @ed342
    @ed342 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    One thing to keep in mind is operating the buttons under water, I went into a swimming pool with an F91W a few years ago and the screen fogged up, could've been me fiddling with it underwater or something else, but I don't trust anything less than 50m anymore. Whilst there are people here who have been surfing, diving etc with an F91 or similar, those that break probably just discard it and get a G-Shock or other watch.

    • @HobkinBoi
      @HobkinBoi 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Generally you're not supposed to push the buttons/pull the crown on watches while they're underwater.

    • @badd.syntaxx
      @badd.syntaxx หลายเดือนก่อน

      probably you got a fake one 😅

  • @dp2418
    @dp2418 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    bought my first cheap casio when i was 10, lady said u'll go to college and still wear it. she was right:) casios are bulletproof

  • @veetour
    @veetour ปีที่แล้ว

    This is good to know as I am getting this watch soon. I'm gonna feel quite safe wearing it in the shower.

  • @NickNick-id8sb
    @NickNick-id8sb ปีที่แล้ว +5

    One of the best videos on casio I've seen (the other one is Teddy Baltassarre throwing G-SHOCKS out of a helicopter). This is probably the best review on the A158WA-1 without being a review. Awesome video. Great job.

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  ปีที่แล้ว

      Appreciate it! I found it very interesting!

  • @josesousa272
    @josesousa272 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That's very impressive Engineering there!😮

  • @tomcocchiaro3997
    @tomcocchiaro3997 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Hey Harrison, any chance of running a depth test on another Casio--the super cool Red Casio G-Shock G7900A-4 Tide Watch which is rated at 200M. Thanks.

  • @Kairosdex
    @Kairosdex 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Could you try this with a cheap 30m analogue watch? I'm curious if a push-pull crown can go beyond 30M without breaking!

  • @forthefunofit5487
    @forthefunofit5487 ปีที่แล้ว

    interesting video. Thanks.

  • @-----REDACTED-----
    @-----REDACTED----- 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So…I don’t know if it’s universal, but a mechanical engineer once told me that components usually have a designed safety margin of at least around three times the official rating.
    So while I wouldn’t expect it I wouldn’t be surprised if the actual failure point of the watch were to be around 90m…
    Edit:
    Well, I am impressed by that watch.

  • @JavierBonillaC
    @JavierBonillaC 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wouldn't like to see you stop at 90 m. Which is three times what it was expected to withstand. Very good video thank you very much.

  • @spex.official
    @spex.official 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Give the LCD a bit of heat with a lighter so the lcd layers can separate again, should work fine after that.

  • @eugenekim8417
    @eugenekim8417 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool machine!

  • @danzigrulze5211
    @danzigrulze5211 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As long as I know I can go swimming, long boarding, and surfing with my cheaper Casio watches, then I'm happy with that.

  • @kingfisher65
    @kingfisher65 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    bro risk his face from possible exploding pressure chamber. Just amazing Casio watches

  • @piccalillipit9211
    @piccalillipit9211 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    THATS AMAZING

  • @lakshbhambhani8565
    @lakshbhambhani8565 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Incredibly dangerous to push the tank that far off its rated for 100m 🙈

    • @TheChzoronzon
      @TheChzoronzon 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      And putting his uncovered eyes close to the glass while at it... I was shaking my head all the time, the guy has a real problem with both counting and common sense :facepalm:

  • @Ivoree-yr7up
    @Ivoree-yr7up 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Whats that equipment simulating water depths pressure?

  • @JS-ev4xc
    @JS-ev4xc 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Swiss brands 30m WR is literally splash proof. But from your video, Casio 30m WR is truly 30m or more water proof. No wonder I can wear my F91W for 30min laps swimming regularly & wondering why it still functions.

  • @a16383
    @a16383 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What are you using, exactly, to simulate the pressure? What's the name of the device (brand, model)?

  • @stockedrice8340
    @stockedrice8340 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    my friend used to swim in salt water with this and it still works

    • @StardustLegacyFighter
      @StardustLegacyFighter 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's not an issue at all, you just need to wash the watch with tap water afterwards.

  • @DarthJabba504
    @DarthJabba504 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video. Thanks.

  • @bassamtaha5325
    @bassamtaha5325 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you !

  • @4by_yotaguy373
    @4by_yotaguy373 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That Casio is savage 😮😮🎉

  • @jamesblonde2271
    @jamesblonde2271 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    (late comment) I still have the Seiko5 I was wearing for my first three "fun" dives, hell itlooked like a dive watch😂 B4 the sub people used to dive with Oyster Perpetuals, my divemaster instructor wore a gmt to dive in.

  • @MrAlperenfener
    @MrAlperenfener 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Retail shop says avoid to swim with this watch , but I have no idea about diving and swimming pressure difference.

  • @__Nikola__
    @__Nikola__ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice experiment! It would be cool to try it with a hydro-moded one. Any chance of doing that? :) It can also be an f91w, it has the same water resistance but is a lot cheaper.

  • @Amin2k
    @Amin2k 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I had this watch and i thought it was only splash resistant? never knew it could go to 30 meters or even more!

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A lot of watches might surprise you!

  • @alanaliyev456GT
    @alanaliyev456GT ปีที่แล้ว +5

    20 atm is enormous for this type of chamber... most transparent test chamber not exceed 10atm

  • @0hleg
    @0hleg 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks I needed this to know if I can swim to the bottom of my 200m pool and back up without breaking my watch.

  • @gilderoygold1902
    @gilderoygold1902 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thats amazing, would be cool if you could test different watches :-)

  • @WATCH-4U
    @WATCH-4U 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a great test this was it really does chuckle me how watch folk do not even get water splashes on a 30wr watch..ive tons of 30wr watches even a timex weekender ive swam in a pool even sea with theyre fine... shower swimming pool and normal swimming in the sea is fine with a 30m WR WATCH

    • @HarrisonElmore
      @HarrisonElmore  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed! Glad you liked it!

  • @stefanoballiero8319
    @stefanoballiero8319 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The interesting thing is that being electronic you could easily modify it to make it "without limits", just fill it with petroleum jelly oil.

    • @Rick-ve5lx
      @Rick-ve5lx 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I tried an oil mod on an F91 but oil leaked out when I pressed the buttons.

  • @zakkandsurajmusic
    @zakkandsurajmusic 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When Casio prints WR on its wristwatches, it stands for World Record.

  • @91doctorj
    @91doctorj 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have heard that because it's a cheap watch the only rate it 30 m because it will cost them more to rate it for a deeper depth even though it's probably possible just never been tested by the QC people.

  • @user-dl5oe3it4k
    @user-dl5oe3it4k ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Modern Watches: Oh no water!!!
    $30 Casio: I am happy to go swimming🙂

  • @alanaliyev456GT
    @alanaliyev456GT 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Im really (good )surprised ! I was in total confidence for 150 feets(5 atm+1) but i never imagine theese astoning performance. For casio vintage ! Personally i just watch hands with Casio vintage no more ! FOR SEE BATH I HAVE mdv 107 and mtd 1053 20 atm certified

  • @Traveljournalist
    @Traveljournalist ปีที่แล้ว

    is it a special version of the A158 ?