@@NishanKhalsa1984Indian doesn't mean India... Dumbarse.. Americans call native Americans as Indians.. Indian brand logo is based of native Americans who were called Indian..
Picked up my new Indian Scout Bobber a month ago absolutely love it never even considered a Harley, as far as all the new tec i can get that with my smart phone and air pods and not pay thousands extra, on top of that the Scout is a modern motorcycle with a classic look.
Great video! I've owned Guzzis, Ducatis, Harley Sportsters and Dynas, and now a tasty Indian Scout 100th Anniversary bike. Was tempted by the FTR but I'm old now. 100hp and head turning looks is enough now. I do like the new Harley. I love that there are so many great bikes available now (Triumph Bobber is another). We live in miraculous times. Find your bike and love the one you ride, my friends.
I personally like this new direction HD is taking. I hope they continue with lower displacement bikes. I’d like to see a modern naked 975 or even 750 with retro Sportster styling. Mid controls please. 👍
Me too. In fact more than an "S" shoud be totally "FT". And the best HD on track were their mid750 flat trackers, sadly not on roads like their chops and customs. I think, despite I don't like personally any kind of tech digi controls on motors, it only lacks not offer low displacement and A2 License compliant bikes. This wil be safe HD crisis, like new Indian does.
Many countries in the world are more favorable to "small" bikes like 400-750cc. HD would take a page from Enfield's play book and make well built bikes of that size (not counting the crappy Street series) they could sell well in other countries. A new Softail costs as much as a 2 bedroom apartment in my country. No thanks.
@@khaccanhle1930 Enfield's are P.O.S. The Sportster S isn't the big, and you can put it in different modes including throttle modes to feel like a 500cc bike and when you're around some bigger bikes just put in sport mode. I would rather have mid controls and conventional shocks on back with more travel. Also a low set of pipes.
@@benkrom2737 you must be an American. Most of the people who ride bikes as a form of transportation live in Africa and Asia. That's over a billion riders. For these people, 500cc is big and anything above 800cc is ridiculous. Most speeds are BELOW 45MPH, and on small tight roads. If any American company truly wants to sell large numbers and get a grip on the global market, they MUST make bikes 700cc or less. The fact you don't realize that is typical of how clueless the American motorcycling culture is about the rest of the world. I hate to break it to you, the motorcycle market doesn't revolve around the USA.
@@khaccanhle1930 Harley davidson is an American motorcycle. I don't care about you liking it. I've ridden motorcycles for pleasure and transportation. I've ridden in all kinds of weather including snow . I know there's different types of riders. Not only do I have two bikes with large CC's , I have two bikes with under 250cc. Don't try to dictate what others should ride, not everyone likes just putt putt around !
I remember when 1200cc was nearly the top displacement you could get in a cruiser. Harley's were 1340cc and Suzuki had the 1400 Intruder. The Goldwing 1500cc was as big as they got! Back then 750cc was a "middle weight" bike.
Me and my Honda VRX400, I always thought of that as mid size and a 250 as small. But here in Asia the roads are much tighter and speeds slower. Good luck parking a Softail in a parking garage here.
Up til 1980 Harleys were 74", 1200cc. In 1980 they started putting out 80" Shovelheads, then went to the evo. engines. My first bike was a 1974 Honda 750, which was a straight four and one of the first " superbikes"!!
Sportster S vs the Scout? I'll have the HD Sportster S vs the FTR though? I'll take the Indian. The FTR is one of the best looking bikes on the road, in any category.
I really don't understand why people are comparing the Sportster S to the Scout. HD clearly designed the bike to compete against the FTR. They come in at exactly the same HP, and exactly the same price, with very nearly the same technology features.... the decision between the two basically comes down to whether you like your feet in front of you or slightly behind when riding. I agree with MOTOBOB here that we really haven't seen HD's competitor against the Scout yet, and I suspect that when we do see that "non S" sportster sometime in the next year, the spec sheet is going to look very similar to what the Scout offers today.
@@paden501 i disagree because they have already shown a street tracker concept that's coming out to compete with the ftr Both the bobber and the sportster s have big fat tires with single brakes and low travel suspensions
@@paden501 But... people kept on comparing the Scout to the Sportster 1200. Now, is it not fair to compare the Sportster S to the Scout? The Scout should always had to be compared to the V-Rod, which clearly was superior in performance, not the Sportster. This situations only let see the double standard people have against H-D.
Both great bikes, but perhaps not too comparable in my mind... Maybe more appropriate might be the Sportster S vs the Indian FTR? I'd certainly prefer the styling and laid back simplicity of the Scout, but that's my tech-phobic age speaking!!!
The main selling point to me with these bikes is the styling and love the modern Indians. From the Sixty to the Chief, I could buy any of them. The new tech is great for Harley but for years Harley owners never cared that their bikes were lacking modern features and design.
Hey Bob..nice work! Again. Not my style of bike-but Indian for me all day long! Tech ! Not that interested? Indian I’d buy on looks alone. Probably quite reliable too.👍🏻
I did my own Sporster S vs HD Street Bob ride, S is incredible, pretty high tech, but went with Steet Bob, accent bike to our 05 Road King, almost 50 years old, so classic styling more my gig! 20 year old son loved the S...he test road both as well.
I had the same thing in mind for a REAL comparison being the FTR. Price and engine primarily. The FTR is tough to compare though because it is a Jack of all trades but the king in aesthetics. I’ve taken mine on overnight camp trips consisting of dozens of dirt road miles, ripped wheelies in the straights and leaned far enough in the Oregon mountains to make my inexperienced butt pucker. So I’m probably biased and am more than happy with my FTR. BUT! If I hadn’t fallen in love with it beforehand, I would honestly be choosing between these two.
Great video but yes these are not comparable bikes. Sportster S versus FTR and scout bobber versus the regular sportster. In both cases Indian wins in price, performance, and I think looks as well. Either way we can all thank Indian for forcing Harley to up their game.
Blockhead Just did a ride review of the sportster S and there were both forward and mid mounted controls, so you will have the option for mid controls which I also greatly prefer.
Yeah I saw Chase on Two Wheels was at the same press event as Blockhead and they had both mid and forward controls on the bikes. According to the HD website, the mid controls is a $600 or $700 option. Forward controls come standard on the bikes.
I did not know it was an additional cost. That some garbage. Hopefully aftermarket parts come out relatively soon after it's available for purchase so you can switch for less that 700 dollars
Definitely an unfair comparison. We will want to wait for the standard sportster and then pit that against the scout, it will be a lot more apples to apples. This should definitely has been the S vs the FTR. This bike is a definite shot at that bike. And I am absolutely team Sportster S in that shootout.
LoL... top speed on the sportster s in 121 mph.. this ain't gonna cut it , Had my BoBBer to 140+ last Saturday. too scary, not doin that again, it was still accelerating . had more to give, NOT doin that again, that was pretty stupid of me bit i wanted to see the top speed it produced, im guessing over 150 mph, maybe more
100% Indian for me If Power then Ducati Diavel as a Cruiser , at the Moment Im driving a Ducati Multi sport s with a lot of Carbon in Carlin Dunne Design, but as far as Style is concerned definitely Indian !!! Will the next Bike also because I already have Power!!!
The Sportster S seats in between the Scout and the FTR and I don't think it beats them when it comes to what the bike is all about. The Scout is a low to the ground high revving cruiser with great looks and great power. The FTR is a flat out tracker with looks to go along with it. The Sportster S looks good but it looks like it doesn't know what it wants to be. I would of been great to see this engine in a bike that looks more like a Harley 48. Personally I would not choose the Sportster over the FTR and the Scout is cheaper and more in like to what I would want out of a cruise. Looks, plenty of power and a lower seat for that bobber look.
Wait until you hear the Sportster S. Ridiculous. Harley used to take immense care of the sound being "authentic Harley sound" but now they've just gone with a sound about as far from that as possible. I never in a million years would've thought they could possibly make the bike sound so horrible. One of the worst sounding bikes I've ever heard. It looks fantastic, but who cares about that when the engine is not only devoid of any enjoyment but is actually embarrassing?
Agreed. The riding position on the Sportster S looks a little cramped for the knees - akin (dare I say it) to the street 500/750 for which they were criticised, We'll have to wait for the honest independent reviews.
H-D launched the V-Rod around 2001, and by that time, that bike could generate a max. of 110 hp. The Scout was launched ten years after, producing a max. of 100 hp. It is Polaris that cannot keep up with H-D. It is so, that people is forcing a Sportster S vs FTR comparison in order to make Polaris look like a rival, but that's what they should have done when comparing the Scout vs the Sportster 1200: they should have compared the Scout to the V-Rod. Period. Now let's talk about double standards.
A note to the video: The Scout can generate 100 hp at the crank. The stated 66 hp of the Iron 1200 is to the rear wheel. The Scout can generate around 82 hp to the rear wheel.
I have a 2017 scout 61 cu in motor with gp shorty slips on and a indian stage 1 intake and with a tune on a dyno I made 92 hp @ 7800 rpm and 74 ft lb of torque at 4800 rpm at the rear wheel.
While the HD looks badass and futuristic I have to give it to the Indian Scout Bobber for that old school look and feel. Adding smaller fenders, a solo seat and a few minor mods give the Indian an even more amazing look. But that Sportster S is one sexy bike too.
Not wise I’d go for the Indian. I will likely sell my trident and buy the new Triumph Bobber, which in my opinion is the best looking cruiser out there.
And I think I'd take either the Rebel 1100 or Triumph Bobber over either of these. Neither one directly compares in engine specs but that's only a matter of time before either one bothers to put in the effort for it.
The sportster will have 30 different models before long, with any part you can think of, tons of performance parts, and huge aftermarket support. I won’t buy a first model (I don’t collect bikes) and wait for the bugs to get ironed out. Won’t buy an Indian because I just don’t like the bike.
Comparing the Scout engine to one form the Sportster seems a bit disingenuous when it compares more directly to the V-rod Revolution engine but in a lighter more nimble frame.
That price difference is going to be an issue for HD in the US I think, which is really unfortunate. I actually prefer the less tech on the Indian though, too many fancy doo-dads on bikes to fail now days just like cars. Just need my gauges and maybe ABS and that's plenty.
Catalytic converters under the engine (most Bonnevilles) are unobtrusive but put a lot of heat to the engine, however catalytic converters in high pipes running against or near enough to your crotch is a worse idea for temperate zones. No matter how good a bike might be being a roasted marshmallow doesn't interest me.
You got it right...at the end. The FTR is the proper competitor for the sportster S. The current "sportsters" are now labeled as "cruisers". The new "sportsters" are definitely more like the FTR, and an alternative to the scout, but not a direct competitor to the scout.
The Indian scout and scout bobber have been around for a while so I wouldn't be surprised if they have a slightly bigger engine ready to be used in these, perhaps around 1350 or 1400cc?
Rode the Sportster S at a dealer demo day. Great bike. Lots of power, handles great, and looks great too. The Scout looks good but having not ridden it I can’t imagine it’s even close to the Sportster. I think Harley really hit one out of the park with the Sportster S.
Okay I have riden both. I prefer the scout. The new scout has a 3 settings one for sport and one for touring. And the last one is normal riding. To me the scout is a better bike. I loved the handling of the Harley. But I then rode a scout. The scout handled way better. So I am buying a scout
I really don't understand why people are comparing the Sportster S to the Scout. HD clearly designed the bike to compete against the FTR. They come in at exactly the same HP, and exactly the same price, with very nearly the same technology features.... the decision between the two basically comes down to whether you like your feet in front of you or slightly behind when riding. I agree with you that we really haven't seen HD's competitor against the Scout yet, and I suspect that when we do see that "non S" sportster sometime in the next year, the spec sheet is going to look very similar to what the Scout offers today.
I am not a harley guy but this sporster s is peace of art but the fuel 3.1 fuel tank is insanely smallwhich means a very bad fuel range. Manufacturers are going with smaller fuel tank to save weight and it becomes unridable; then we don't need cruise control since we can't go anywhere or commute.
That new, other, Sportster looks like the old FXR. Which is good! That was a good bike. I think the Indian is easier to customize. Those exhaustpipes on the Sportster incorporated in the bodywork makes it more difficult.
Now Indian needs to put the ftr 1200 power plant in a cruiser platform I still choose the scout bobber over the sporter s due to looks, practicality and sound oh and in my country the sporter s is 9k more with that price tag could at least add dual disc upfront.
This is something that "Indian SCOUT" cannot afford to lose. It's good to see more competition in water cooling. I'm sure the next model will be even more advanced.
One of the main reasons the Scout is cheaper here in the US is that we don't require motorcycles to have ABS. WHile the EU does. So here in the US ABS is like a $1,000 option or something like that.
Is it just me or is MotoBob speaking faster these days? I used to love his relaxed pace and methodical descriptions with slower video transitions. Now I find myself backing up over and over as the video sequences don’t match the commentary as well as before. I appreciate packing in as much video as possible, but not firing off the specs at a blinding place with video cutaways that distract from the review. My first criticism ever and totally subjective. Any one care to comment?
i love both of these 2 brand but still the new sportster's v-twin engine looks like a 4th grade art homework to me triumph already did a good job designing t100's new liquid cooled engine
Aesthetically I really like the look of the Sportster S, but something about the riding stance looks uncomfortable to me! Not sure if it's just my imagination though.
The Sportster S is the 1st HD that I want, love the Bobber but the HD seem more a complete package. Don't see anything I would change on the Sportster S, on the Bobber the exhaust system has to go, looks terrible to me. Never thought I would want an HD, this bike is going to get me in the dealer as soon as my current bike is payed for.
Wait until you hear the Sportster S. It sounds like a parallel twin 250cc that some guy is schlepping around Vietnam...or maybe even worse than that. There are literally lawn mowers that sound a lot better.
I prefer the Harley. I am really all for its license plate holder bumper styling sitting just in front of the rear wheel. The Harley does not have a pure stripped down cruiser style lke the Scout Bobber, but I think it integrates enough new and vintage stylining in a package that offers a greater value.
All good points in the video, comes down to how they ride. On paper I would take the HD, like the new look minus the high exhaust ( but actually who keeps the stock one ) its the heat and rear suspension that will make or break me.
does the sportster s exhause customizable tho? cause by the look of it they use a a piece of plastic from the seat to cover the exhaust so they wont burn the passenger.
That Harley does look good but I will stick with my Indian to see if there are any reliability issues with the Harley before I get another bike in 2 to 3 years.
Sportster S all day long. Everyone want technology well there it is . But now everyone will bitch about the price. Pick one or the other. Shit isn't free.
I said it one i will say it again I'm hoping that the new Sporty S will push Indian to produce a Scout R with the engine spec from the FTR S and same USD forks and dual discs front brakes and a bit more rear end travel and mid controls it would be a belter!! But I think Indian is thinking that if you want a sporty ride on the road buy the FTR S if you want to a fastish cruiser get the Scout. HD is clever cause the new sporty S is bang in the midle of the tow Indian models in terms of power and price. So now it seems to be a golden option especially here in UK with UK prices! I still want to see the Bromx with the same power and torque figures as the PanAm and that will fill the whole left by the Ducatis Monster 1200! So far I'm loving this cruiser revolution and I hope this will lead to more intresting bikes. Remember the Voctry Octane maybe Indian will put this on the market as a new model. And you can't forget about the Honda Rebel 1100. With a better price ok a bit lest power but I bet in the real world it will be as quick as the American duo.
Love what HD is doing at the moment. Pan Am is my favourite so far but only because of my riding interests, but the Spotster S looks fantastic, choosing this over an Indian for sure
So bottom line to what you said; Indian taught Harley how to redesign the Sportster and make it a better bike? Kinda like when the 111 out performed the 114, HD answered with a 117, Oh that's right then they did they did the 116 that blew the 117 out of the water. I wonder what the Scout will have next year?
The price of the bobber is quoted without ABS. By the time you add ABS, pipes, and better shocks you’re looking at the same price point as the Sportster S. I love the looks of the Bobber better but seems like Harleys tech might win some people over.
Finally, retro classics or 70's alike "oval racers" bikes needs to be mid controls. No matter if we prefer "board" or "flat" tracker style. And for sure, cover all level Driving License to achieve a good market position. Start fidelity clients from the base.
It's the HD for me on this one. The FTR is properly powerful but vibrates like a naked bike shouldn't! HD's Pan A is crazy smooth! If the Sportster is as smooth then it's win as a new entry small cruiser. The FTR can take a speed hump at 40mpr with a smile, the scout and the new sportster not so much :( I want that rev max engine in a naked bike so I can ride like a proper hooligan on a smooth American bike!
It's a good comparison. You either want simplistic riding with the Indian, just start and ride and not to much to worry about or focus on other than the looks or all the gadgets harley where theres more on the screen than the bike. Two great bikes being made but Ill enjoy the Indian more for me but would like to try the sportster :)
I find that is only Harley I think I would buy. Since you only need clip on bars and rear placed foot pegs. Also two to one pipe with cat removal. That might shave off other 25 labs
So glad there are two iconic American brands innovating against each other. Harley was stuck in a rut and needed someone to challenge them.
The styling of the Scout is beautiful. There’s something about the fuel tank and its Indian logo that really draws me in.
But it's not a indian company it's usa company
@@NishanKhalsa1984Indian doesn't mean India... Dumbarse.. Americans call native Americans as Indians..
Indian brand logo is based of native Americans who were called Indian..
Picked up my new Indian Scout Bobber a month ago absolutely love it never even considered a Harley, as far as all the new tec i can get that with my smart phone and air pods and not pay thousands extra, on top of that the Scout is a modern motorcycle with a classic look.
But your phone will fly away of you fall
@@khrisstake2210smart watch
Great video! I've owned Guzzis, Ducatis, Harley Sportsters and Dynas, and now a tasty Indian Scout 100th Anniversary bike. Was tempted by the FTR but I'm old now. 100hp and head turning looks is enough now. I do like the new Harley. I love that there are so many great bikes available now (Triumph Bobber is another). We live in miraculous times. Find your bike and love the one you ride, my friends.
like your collection. i like the looks of indian scout but i will go with harley sportsters because of feature, lightweight and brand.
So would u recommend an Indian for my first bike?
I personally like this new direction HD is taking. I hope they continue with lower displacement bikes. I’d like to see a modern naked 975 or even 750 with retro Sportster styling. Mid controls please. 👍
Me too.
In fact more than an "S" shoud be totally "FT".
And the best HD on track were their mid750 flat trackers, sadly not on roads like their chops and customs.
I think, despite I don't like personally any kind of tech digi controls on motors, it only lacks not offer low displacement and A2 License compliant bikes.
This wil be safe HD crisis, like new Indian does.
Many countries in the world are more favorable to "small" bikes like 400-750cc. HD would take a page from Enfield's play book and make well built bikes of that size (not counting the crappy Street series) they could sell well in other countries.
A new Softail costs as much as a 2 bedroom apartment in my country. No thanks.
@@khaccanhle1930 Enfield's are P.O.S. The Sportster S isn't the big, and you can put it in different modes including throttle modes to feel like a 500cc bike and when you're around some bigger bikes just put in sport mode. I would rather have mid controls and conventional shocks on back with more travel. Also a low set of pipes.
@@benkrom2737 you must be an American. Most of the people who ride bikes as a form of transportation live in Africa and Asia. That's over a billion riders. For these people, 500cc is big and anything above 800cc is ridiculous. Most speeds are BELOW 45MPH, and on small tight roads. If any American company truly wants to sell large numbers and get a grip on the global market, they MUST make bikes 700cc or less. The fact you don't realize that is typical of how clueless the American motorcycling culture is about the rest of the world.
I hate to break it to you, the motorcycle market doesn't revolve around the USA.
@@khaccanhle1930 Harley davidson is an American motorcycle. I don't care about you liking it. I've ridden motorcycles for pleasure and transportation. I've ridden in all kinds of weather including snow . I know there's different types of riders. Not only do I have two bikes with large CC's , I have two bikes with under 250cc. Don't try to dictate what others should ride, not everyone likes just putt putt around !
I remember when 1200cc was nearly the top displacement you could get in a cruiser. Harley's were 1340cc and Suzuki had the 1400 Intruder. The Goldwing 1500cc was as big as they got! Back then 750cc was a "middle weight" bike.
Nothing wrong with middleweight. It will do everything.
And now people think 750 is too small for highway.
Me and my Honda VRX400, I always thought of that as mid size and a 250 as small. But here in Asia the roads are much tighter and speeds slower. Good luck parking a Softail in a parking garage here.
Up til 1980 Harleys were 74", 1200cc. In 1980 they started putting out 80" Shovelheads, then went to the evo. engines. My first bike was a 1974 Honda 750, which was a straight four and one of the first " superbikes"!!
I remember when 750cc was the BIG BOY and 1,000cc was massive.
5:54
“List of features on the Indian: ABS …”
“…”
lol that one got me
Same!!!
Sportster S vs the Scout? I'll have the HD
Sportster S vs the FTR though? I'll take the Indian. The FTR is one of the best looking bikes on the road, in any category.
I really don't understand why people are comparing the Sportster S to the Scout. HD clearly designed the bike to compete against the FTR. They come in at exactly the same HP, and exactly the same price, with very nearly the same technology features.... the decision between the two basically comes down to whether you like your feet in front of you or slightly behind when riding.
I agree with MOTOBOB here that we really haven't seen HD's competitor against the Scout yet, and I suspect that when we do see that "non S" sportster sometime in the next year, the spec sheet is going to look very similar to what the Scout offers today.
Not a yank tank fanboy, but the FTR has all my attention atm. I agree, it's a stunner.
@@paden501 i disagree because they have already shown a street tracker concept that's coming out to compete with the ftr
Both the bobber and the sportster s have big fat tires with single brakes and low travel suspensions
@@paden501 But... people kept on comparing the Scout to the Sportster 1200. Now, is it not fair to compare the Sportster S to the Scout? The Scout should always had to be compared to the V-Rod, which clearly was superior in performance, not the Sportster. This situations only let see the double standard people have against H-D.
The Scout is a Jewel
Both great bikes, but perhaps not too comparable in my mind... Maybe more appropriate might be the Sportster S vs the Indian FTR? I'd certainly prefer the styling and laid back simplicity of the Scout, but that's my tech-phobic age speaking!!!
Yeah. I think Scout is closer to Fat Bob and FTR is closer to Sportster
The main selling point to me with these bikes is the styling and love the modern Indians. From the Sixty to the Chief, I could buy any of them. The new tech is great for Harley but for years Harley owners never cared that their bikes were lacking modern features and design.
I find nothing truly special or middle weight about these bikes (for their price), but I would buy the Indian for its fuel tank alone😊
Hey Bob..nice work! Again. Not my style of bike-but Indian for me all day long! Tech ! Not that interested? Indian I’d buy on looks alone. Probably quite reliable too.👍🏻
I did my own Sporster S vs HD Street Bob ride, S is incredible, pretty high tech, but went with Steet Bob, accent bike to our 05 Road King, almost 50 years old, so classic styling more my gig! 20 year old son loved the S...he test road both as well.
I had the same thing in mind for a REAL comparison being the FTR. Price and engine primarily. The FTR is tough to compare though because it is a Jack of all trades but the king in aesthetics. I’ve taken mine on overnight camp trips consisting of dozens of dirt road miles, ripped wheelies in the straights and leaned far enough in the Oregon mountains to make my inexperienced butt pucker. So I’m probably biased and am more than happy with my FTR. BUT! If I hadn’t fallen in love with it beforehand, I would honestly be choosing between these two.
Great video but yes these are not comparable bikes. Sportster S versus FTR and scout bobber versus the regular sportster. In both cases Indian wins in price, performance, and I think looks as well. Either way we can all thank Indian for forcing Harley to up their game.
Thats the beautiful thing about competition. The customer wins in the end!!!
The Sportster S all the way for me! Harley should have gone with mid controls as standard and forward controls as an option though.
Exactly.I hope they won't charge 700 just for mids.that would put HD in huge money pit catagory
Blockhead Just did a ride review of the sportster S and there were both forward and mid mounted controls, so you will have the option for mid controls which I also greatly prefer.
Yeah I saw Chase on Two Wheels was at the same press event as Blockhead and they had both mid and forward controls on the bikes. According to the HD website, the mid controls is a $600 or $700 option. Forward controls come standard on the bikes.
@@nbb4109 terrible to charge so much for something that should of been free option.15k +700 mids freight documentation tax its 18k bike.No thanks
I did not know it was an additional cost. That some garbage. Hopefully aftermarket parts come out relatively soon after it's available for purchase so you can switch for less that 700 dollars
Definitely an unfair comparison. We will want to wait for the standard sportster and then pit that against the scout, it will be a lot more apples to apples. This should definitely has been the S vs the FTR. This bike is a definite shot at that bike. And I am absolutely team Sportster S in that shootout.
LoL... top speed on the sportster s in 121 mph.. this ain't gonna cut it , Had my BoBBer to 140+ last Saturday. too scary,
not doin that again, it was still accelerating . had more to give, NOT doin that again, that was pretty stupid of me bit i wanted to see the top speed it produced, im guessing over 150 mph, maybe more
100% Indian for me
If Power then Ducati Diavel as a Cruiser , at the Moment Im driving a Ducati Multi sport s with a lot of Carbon in Carlin Dunne Design, but as far as Style is concerned definitely Indian !!! Will the next Bike also because I already have Power!!!
The Sportster S seats in between the Scout and the FTR and I don't think it beats them when it comes to what the bike is all about. The Scout is a low to the ground high revving cruiser with great looks and great power. The FTR is a flat out tracker with looks to go along with it. The Sportster S looks good but it looks like it doesn't know what it wants to be. I would of been great to see this engine in a bike that looks more like a Harley 48. Personally I would not choose the Sportster over the FTR and the Scout is cheaper and more in like to what I would want out of a cruise. Looks, plenty of power and a lower seat for that bobber look.
Wait until you hear the Sportster S. Ridiculous. Harley used to take immense care of the sound being "authentic Harley sound" but now they've just gone with a sound about as far from that as possible. I never in a million years would've thought they could possibly make the bike sound so horrible. One of the worst sounding bikes I've ever heard.
It looks fantastic, but who cares about that when the engine is not only devoid of any enjoyment but is actually embarrassing?
Indian Scout Bobber ABS Thunder Smoke Black for me! . The price for the Scout is actually $12,999 and $13,999 for the White edition.
Not a Harley fan. I honestly prefer the Indian FTR S. For the price I think the FTR S beats it's Harley counterpart all day.
That is probably the coolest harley on the market, but I still absolutely love my scout. It's my favorite bike ever
The Sportster update is exactly the kind of thing HD needed in its lineup, but I still prefer the Bobber.
wait until the new Sportsters (non S) come out. Looking at a 975 and a 1250. Traditional Sportster styling (adding a radiator) and all the gizmo's....
Nice bike.. but I still love the way my scout looks. It turns heads all day long.
The look of the all black mat Indian cant be topped
I’m waiting for the Sportster RRR-R when they finally stop using forward foot pegs.
I believe Harley will put on mid controls for ~$700 (expensive for sure but at least it’s an option)
Agreed. The riding position on the Sportster S looks a little cramped for the knees - akin (dare I say it) to the street 500/750 for which they were criticised, We'll have to wait for the honest independent reviews.
Style, suave, grace, POWER, resilience, the Godfather of the MC cruiser....
INDIAN MOTORCYLCES since 1901!
Indian Scout, Harley cannot keep up with Indian.
H-D launched the V-Rod around 2001, and by that time, that bike could generate a max. of 110 hp. The Scout was launched ten years after, producing a max. of 100 hp. It is Polaris that cannot keep up with H-D. It is so, that people is forcing a Sportster S vs FTR comparison in order to make Polaris look like a rival, but that's what they should have done when comparing the Scout vs the Sportster 1200: they should have compared the Scout to the V-Rod. Period. Now let's talk about double standards.
@@omarsalgado9715 Porsche made the V-Rods engine not HD. so neither brands can keep up with Porsche lol
A note to the video:
The Scout can generate 100 hp at the crank.
The stated 66 hp of the Iron 1200 is to the rear wheel.
The Scout can generate around 82 hp to the rear wheel.
I have a 2017 scout 61 cu in motor with gp shorty slips on and a indian stage 1 intake and with a tune on a dyno I made 92 hp @ 7800 rpm and 74 ft lb of torque at 4800 rpm at the rear wheel.
Don't think they are comparable... I got the scout, engine highly reliable.. beautiful and really fun to ride...
While the HD looks badass and futuristic I have to give it to the Indian Scout Bobber for that old school look and feel. Adding smaller fenders, a solo seat and a few minor mods give the Indian an even more amazing look. But that Sportster S is one sexy bike too.
HD ... always... much better! Great video
Still love the scout bob
They’re both beautiful bikes, but the Indian comes out on top!
But it's not indian company it's usa company
Not wise I’d go for the Indian. I will likely sell my trident and buy the new Triumph Bobber, which in my opinion is the best looking cruiser out there.
ugliest bike on the market.
Triumph bobber is one of the ugliest bikes ever built. Its the Bonneville with zero thought made to a chopped up rear end.
I think that sportster looks awesome, but please Harley, get rid of the forward controls
Mid controls is actually an option in the new Sportster S.
And I think I'd take either the Rebel 1100 or Triumph Bobber over either of these. Neither one directly compares in engine specs but that's only a matter of time before either one bothers to put in the effort for it.
The sportster will have 30 different models before long, with any part you can think of, tons of performance parts, and huge aftermarket support.
I won’t buy a first model (I don’t collect bikes) and wait for the bugs to get ironed out. Won’t buy an Indian because I just don’t like the bike.
they will need it with 121 top speed LoL
Comparing the Scout engine to one form the Sportster seems a bit disingenuous when it compares more directly to the V-rod Revolution engine but in a lighter more nimble frame.
That price difference is going to be an issue for HD in the US I think, which is really unfortunate. I actually prefer the less tech on the Indian though, too many fancy doo-dads on bikes to fail now days just like cars. Just need my gauges and maybe ABS and that's plenty.
I think the Scout takes all points for reliability and heritage…
Catalytic converters under the engine (most Bonnevilles) are unobtrusive but put a lot of heat to the engine, however catalytic converters in high pipes running against or near enough to your crotch is a worse idea for temperate zones.
No matter how good a bike might be being a roasted marshmallow doesn't interest me.
In my opinion, the scout bobber looks much nicer. Especially in that dark green.
You got it right...at the end. The FTR is the proper competitor for the sportster S. The current "sportsters" are now labeled as "cruisers". The new "sportsters" are definitely more like the FTR, and an alternative to the scout, but not a direct competitor to the scout.
The Indian scout and scout bobber have been around for a while so I wouldn't be surprised if they have a slightly bigger engine ready to be used in these, perhaps around 1350 or 1400cc?
coool !
Ive been a Harley-Davidson guy my whole life and id go with a Polaris any day over the HD
Rode the Sportster S at a dealer demo day. Great bike. Lots of power, handles great, and looks great too. The Scout looks good but having not ridden it I can’t imagine it’s even close to the Sportster. I think Harley really hit one out of the park with the Sportster S.
New to the motorcycle world, will be buying an Indian Scout Bobber my 1st bike next summer for my bday. Tons of great motorcycles out there geesh
Okay I have riden both. I prefer the scout. The new scout has a 3 settings one for sport and one for touring. And the last one is normal riding. To me the scout is a better bike. I loved the handling of the Harley. But I then rode a scout. The scout handled way better. So I am buying a scout
Nice I'm look8ng at both of these as well
Sportster 1250 S for $14,999 USA or Indian FTR 1200 S for $14,999
I really don't understand why people are comparing the Sportster S to the Scout. HD clearly designed the bike to compete against the FTR. They come in at exactly the same HP, and exactly the same price, with very nearly the same technology features.... the decision between the two basically comes down to whether you like your feet in front of you or slightly behind when riding.
I agree with you that we really haven't seen HD's competitor against the Scout yet, and I suspect that when we do see that "non S" sportster sometime in the next year, the spec sheet is going to look very similar to what the Scout offers today.
What about reliability? Been hearing sportster s has been having issues.
I am not a harley guy but this sporster s is peace of art but the fuel 3.1 fuel tank is insanely smallwhich means a very bad fuel range.
Manufacturers are going with smaller fuel tank to save weight and it becomes unridable; then we don't need cruise control since we can't go anywhere or commute.
The Scout is only 2.5 or so, and it’s plenty for how long I’d ride before needing a coffee or butt break. These bikes are not designed for touring.
I'd pick the Scout Bobber everyday of the week... But I would probably pick streetbob or low rider ahead of the Scout bobber.
i prefer the Indian Scout, the HD is too much expensive and the style is better in the Bobber model. hugs bikers!
That new, other, Sportster looks like the old FXR. Which is good! That was a good bike.
I think the Indian is easier to customize. Those exhaustpipes on the Sportster incorporated in the bodywork makes it more difficult.
Now Indian needs to put the ftr 1200 power plant in a cruiser platform I still choose the scout bobber over the sporter s due to looks, practicality and sound oh and in my country the sporter s is 9k more with that price tag could at least add dual disc upfront.
This is something that "Indian SCOUT" cannot afford to lose.
It's good to see more competition in water cooling.
I'm sure the next model will be even more advanced.
One of the main reasons the Scout is cheaper here in the US is that we don't require motorcycles to have ABS. WHile the EU does. So here in the US ABS is like a $1,000 option or something like that.
I bought my bobber for the looks and because it was stripped back without all the rider modes etc. Isn't that the point of a Bobber?
I own the Olight Warrior X and the Olight Valkyrie PL Pro. I can attest to the quality! A+. Get one, you won’t be disappointed!
Is it just me or is MotoBob speaking faster these days? I used to love his relaxed pace and methodical descriptions with slower video transitions. Now I find myself backing up over and over as the video sequences don’t match the commentary as well as before. I appreciate packing in as much video as possible, but not firing off the specs at a blinding place with video cutaways that distract from the review. My first criticism ever and totally subjective. Any one care to comment?
i love both of these 2 brand
but still the new sportster's v-twin engine looks like a 4th grade art homework to me
triumph already did a good job designing t100's new liquid cooled engine
Aesthetically I really like the look of the Sportster S, but something about the riding stance looks uncomfortable to me! Not sure if it's just my imagination though.
The Sportster S is the 1st HD that I want, love the Bobber but the HD seem more a complete package.
Don't see anything I would change on the Sportster S, on the Bobber the exhaust system has to go, looks terrible to me.
Never thought I would want an HD, this bike is going to get me in the dealer as soon as my current bike is payed for.
Wait until you hear the Sportster S. It sounds like a parallel twin 250cc that some guy is schlepping around Vietnam...or maybe even worse than that. There are literally lawn mowers that sound a lot better.
I prefer the Harley. I am really all for its license plate holder bumper styling sitting just in front of the rear wheel. The Harley does not have a pure stripped down cruiser style lke the Scout Bobber, but I think it integrates enough new and vintage stylining in a package that offers a greater value.
I guess key is what the aftermarket will do. Will they support the Indian or HD? time will tell....
In the USA, old Sportster with alarm, paint, and Abs almost $12,000. For $15,000 Sportster S you get so much more and no Stage 4 needed!!
So id used the money u saved from the scout put it in the cams air filter and other upgrades it will beat it it right and cost the same.
All good points in the video, comes down to how they ride. On paper I would take the HD, like the new look minus the high exhaust ( but actually who keeps the stock one ) its the heat and rear suspension that will make or break me.
does the sportster s exhause customizable tho? cause by the look of it they use a a piece of plastic from the seat to cover the exhaust so they wont burn the passenger.
Use your stroke as a MC influencer to get Harley to put the 1250 into the new Nightster
I’m definitely never buying a Harley, but on this occasion I think it looks better than the scout. In saying that, I’d take the ftr over the Harley
That Harley does look good but I will stick with my Indian to see if there are any reliability issues with the Harley before I get another bike in 2 to 3 years.
How about comparing the Indian Chief vs Harley Sportster S?
Sportster S all day long. Everyone want technology well there it is . But now everyone will bitch about the price. Pick one or the other. Shit isn't free.
I said it one i will say it again I'm hoping that the new Sporty S will push Indian to produce a Scout R with the engine spec from the FTR S and same USD forks and dual discs front brakes and a bit more rear end travel and mid controls it would be a belter!! But I think Indian is thinking that if you want a sporty ride on the road buy the FTR S if you want to a fastish cruiser get the Scout. HD is clever cause the new sporty S is bang in the midle of the tow Indian models in terms of power and price. So now it seems to be a golden option especially here in UK with UK prices! I still want to see the Bromx with the same power and torque figures as the PanAm and that will fill the whole left by the Ducatis Monster 1200! So far I'm loving this cruiser revolution and I hope this will lead to more intresting bikes. Remember the Voctry Octane maybe Indian will put this on the market as a new model. And you can't forget about the Honda Rebel 1100. With a better price ok a bit lest power but I bet in the real world it will be as quick as the American duo.
why the crappy small tank on the harley?
Sportster tanks have always been smalllish….not meant for long distance riding….
@@jonnycando that's a shame I might have bought one otherwise.had a 2008 sportster petrol tank was fine looked nice.small tanks not so nice
Think the Indian FTR would have been the better comparison than the Scout. A big difference in money in the US!
The bobber like 1000× better
Would love to have seen side by side photos of them both,but the Sportster’s exhaust is horrific. Indian looks more old school and why I prefer it.
Love what HD is doing at the moment. Pan Am is my favourite so far but only because of my riding interests, but the Spotster S looks fantastic, choosing this over an Indian for sure
Yeah, ftr is more in the wheel house when it comes to power, still....scout is a pretty solid bike, kudos to HD for uping their game.
So bottom line to what you said; Indian taught Harley how to redesign the Sportster and make it a better bike? Kinda like when the 111 out performed the 114, HD answered with a 117, Oh that's right then they did they did the 116 that blew the 117 out of the water. I wonder what the Scout will have next year?
I’ve owned 2 Harleys. My next bike will be an Indian
The price of the bobber is quoted without ABS. By the time you add ABS, pipes, and better shocks you’re looking at the same price point as the Sportster S. I love the looks of the Bobber better but seems like Harleys tech might win some people over.
Finally, retro classics or 70's alike "oval racers" bikes needs to be mid controls. No matter if we prefer "board" or "flat" tracker style.
And for sure, cover all level Driving License to achieve a good market position.
Start fidelity clients from the base.
I'd like to see both of these compared to the Triumph Speed Twin
I like the speed twin a lot might be my next bike, but it wouldn’t really win in a any category. Probably will handle better with smaller tires though
think a fairer comp would be the ftr and the sportster s, imho. both great bike, too.
Indian Scout FTW 🙌🏼
Good value and fun to ride
It's the HD for me on this one. The FTR is properly powerful but vibrates like a naked bike shouldn't!
HD's Pan A is crazy smooth! If the Sportster is as smooth then it's win as a new entry small cruiser.
The FTR can take a speed hump at 40mpr with a smile, the scout and the new sportster not so much :(
I want that rev max engine in a naked bike so I can ride like a proper hooligan on a smooth American bike!
What model Indian Scout is that silver one at 1:29?
Sportster looks goofy af on track 😂😂
Or you could shortlist the Honda Rebel 1100 which seems to have gone under the radar with UK Vloggers.
Sportster s is 17-18g in dealerships, gotta love markup
My buddy just bought one 2 days ago out the door for 16k. White one
It's a good comparison. You either want simplistic riding with the Indian, just start and ride and not to much to worry about or focus on other than the looks or all the gadgets harley where theres more on the screen than the bike. Two great bikes being made but Ill enjoy the Indian more for me but would like to try the sportster :)
I find that is only Harley I think I would buy. Since you only need clip on bars and rear placed foot pegs. Also two to one pipe with cat removal. That might shave off other 25 labs
I personaly like the scout 16 more than the scout bobber its more confertable to ride it daily
I will pass on all Cruisers with Froward controls .. I do like the Indian FTR-1200 a lot howeverl .. and I have test ridden it ..
First HD that I have seen that I actually like. Well done then!