Cant go wrong with either of these excellent cars. RAV4 has some advantages: 1. Spare tire, 2. Panoramic roof option, 3. Ventilated seats, 4. Rear camera is better, and perhaps most important of all 5. Better fuel economy. CRV has 1. More interior space, 2. More cargo space, and (subjective) 3. Better looks
I like the tech in the RAV4 but the CR-V looks like a good place to spend time: comfy leather seats, rich sound quality, spaciousness, not to mention ride and handling.
Went CRV Touring. Buying is very difficult because MSRP is not where it ends. In this market the dealers are adding mandatory accessories (low jack, door guards, wheel locks, etc and so forth) to raise margin even more. Also availability is horrible in general across the industry. No one seems to have cars on the ground ready to sell. You have to wait and only buy what has been allocated to the dealer which alienates consumers and gives you no ability to negotiate price at all. Honda had the easiest process, no market adjustments to the already HIGH msrp.
Remote start is important to me ( and I don’t want to pay a subscription!). I have ventilated seats in my old cars. Never used them. Seldom use my sun roof. Cargo space and passenger comfort, efficiency and reliability. I have owned a Rav 4 and 2 CRV. Definitely leaning to CRV.
@@jamesb.armstrong5433 no you don't, it's built into the key fob, just press the lock button 3x and press and hold on the 3rd time, same for lexus. They just don't advertise it. Probably so people can buy the subscription.
Spare tires usually are only good for up to 50 miles and so is the flat fix machine, so is really a draw there. Beside the cooling seats on the Rav 4, Honda takes it. Plus the Crv's AWD system is actually a AWD with 50-50 split unlike the Rav 4.
I really appreciate the side by side views. It’s extremely helpful. Thanks also for doing the decibel testing because interior noise is a key factor for me.
You brothers just get better and better each week! The blue with black trim on the CRV definitely helps to remove some of its dullard characteristics. It gives me a touch of Volvo in styling(especially in the rear) and proportions. Its odd, this loaded RAV4 is only $4400 less than a Highlander Limited. Sheesh. I think its definitely time for the RAV4 to be refreshed now.
Am a fan of Honda but I just don’t understand why they are always behind in technology. No HUD, 360 camera, ventilated seat and rear view camera in this new age. It’s just too sad….
@@everythinghondapro5548 Just because I prefer one of the two, that doesn't mean I'm paid by the other. I do like the CR-V redesign. Just a few small things different, I'd probably buy one tomorrow lol
It is difficult to convey how much larger the new CRV is compared to the RAV4 in terms of interior space. It’s half way between the RAV4 and a Highlander. The rear seat legroom is huge! What annoys me about the CRV is that Honda didn’t include even an option for 360 degree camera and ventilated seats. I understand that this way they could keep the price under $40K for even the top trim, but still.
If CR-V has 360 camera, it would have been my choice among the many cars we are looking at. Living in the city we have to maneuver through tight spaces and fast so not to block traffic. 360 camera has been the life saver. Love everything else about the new 2024 CR-V.
Both are awesome and offers some difference for different people, I love Honda products because the offer more room and still some fun...and race pedigree includes this weekend as F1 racing world champion engine supplier 2 years in a row
Great comparison. Both are great vehicles that have always been competitive. We had to decide between the two back in 2009 and went with the RAV. Even though the RAV does offer more features at this point, this time we went with the CRV because one was actually available at our local dealer! We would have to wait for months for a RAV. Personally I like the looks of the new CRV better. RAV looks like some sort of transformer.
@@puzer1 the cr-v looks significantly nicer(but beauty is in the eye of the beholder). And their interior is significantly nicer. But in my country they are also a few thousand more than the rav. We currently own a 2020 cr-v, but won't be buying another due to pricing. No interest in a rav either.
These AWD systems are different. If you live in snow country, make sure you try them out in snow before buying. My last RAV-4 was not good, even with small amounts of snow. I felt my 2018 RAV-4 did not do well in snow. Paying $40,000 for a vehicle that does not fit your needs could be an expensive mistake.
My older Audi A4 w/Quattro didn’t do well in snow. I swapped in snow tires (for Audis) and it made big difference. Just gotta swap em off when weather changes. I’d do same if I had the AWD hybrid RAV4
It’s a 10.5” screen. I have a 10” screen in my truck aftermarket. It’s plenty big and I can read the screen without my glasses. The old standard 7” RAV4 screen wasn’t up to date but it connected to my iPhone 13pro every time I got into the veh. So the software on new unit should be just as good. The old radio had great sound too. I was shocked. It’s gonna be excellent.
2022 RAV4, if you have the Audio Plus option, you can still do free remote start. However for 2023 RAV4, they got rid of the Audio Plus option… due to the new head unit. No idea if will support free remote start now. No TH-cam channels so far have gone into details to find this answer.
Honda use CR-V transmission belt drive which is not suitable for towing while Toyota Rav-4 still use the traditional gear drive automatic transmission. People who study mechanical engineering very much can tell that the gear drive system can provide much bigger load than the belt drive system.
Exactly. The RAV4 has 8 spd and no turbo. It’s reliable. I drove it and had no complaints. Amazing that small cars have 8 speeds! We live in a good time.
@@markmason5443 Toyota has an 8 spd transmission (no bands) in its gas only rav4. Their hybrids have CVTs (bands). Toyota makes one of, if not the best, CVT transmissions.
Crv won in the first min. Rav4 you have to pay a mo. subscription to use the remote start. That you already payed for when buying the suv. I will never buy a vehicle from a co. That is that greedy! They cost enough already.
I really wanted the RAV4, but they were 5-7K above MSRP, so I ended up getting the CRV, which isn't a bad vehicle, but I like all the technology the RAV4 comes with.
I just bought a 2020 Rav4 XLE. My wife bought a 2021 CRV HYbrid XLE a few months ago. Crazy but I get to try both and still love the Rav 4. My fear with a Hybrid is still teh problems of batteries and cost of changing them, my CONventional Rav 4 gets great mileage when compared to most any Gas powered SUV, I get power and still about 26 city and I have not had it on a long drive as I just bought it two weeks ago. I also did not like the Electric push buttong Transmission and am surprised Honda went back to the old Stick SHifting feel. The ability to pull a stick into gear sold me and was a major reason I did not go with a Honda. I also found that both are still hard to find USed and Longo Toyota (worlds largest car dealership) says they will not take anymore new orders as they already are backed up 2 years of orders. THey told me TOyota did not increase their produciton after COVID and is behind. So, I hope to be able to find a 2023 Rav 4 in about 3 years to buy. In any case, buying a Used Rav 4 or CRV, regardless of trim is expensive and usually minimum of $3000 more than the car cost when new. I can't even imagine the problem with buying a new TOyota and have no idea what buying a new CRV is like. One last thought is that the quality is great and they both are rated to run over 250,000 miles. It is hard to beat that, I was a BMW owner until I saw the Japanese by far beat them in Quality for price and length of time their products stay on the road.
I tested both. CRV EXL is much better and looks beautiful. Rav 4 is too plasticky, cheap looking and feels lighter while driving. How come Toyota likes plastic so much??
How they handle on rougher road and off-road situations is really what I am interested in and the only reason I am considering an SUV as I am into going off the beaten path for outdoor adventures. None of that was discussed unfortunately. The missing spare tire on the Honda CR-V would definitely be a disqualifier though. I have had too many flat tires in remote locations with no cell-signals.
@@Uncommonsensetoo rav4 adventure model? The hybrid needs to have an a-trac like mechanism and it would be perfect. You could look at subaru also. Theres aftermarket rear lockers for those.
I can not believe Honda didn't come up with 1. Actual spare tire 2. Panoramic Moon roof! How 'stodgy'!! If it weren't for those two items, I would flat out buy the Honda! But I am now going with a different model all together!
The Toyota actually does have the auto start on the key fob aswell by pressing the lock button three times but they don't advertise it for some reason and most people won't know until figuring it out
Toyota offers remote start as a standard feature with the smart key system. You press the lock button twice and press and hold the lock button a 3rd time and it starts right up.
I have a 2020 CR-V EX-L, and I love it. It’s the first car that I’m seriously considering a lease buy-out. I’ve been looking at hybrid vehicles this time (lease ends in July), but the residual value of my CR-V too good to pass up, compared to the new car prices which are ridiculous! When I was in the market for a new car in 2020, I considered the RAV-4, but I just couldn’t get past the cheap interior feel and the over-all cheap looking exterior. The same is true this year.
Honda CRV hybrid will kill over priced and markup rav4 hyrbid. Toyota you are not the only reliable hybrid SUV anymore. Most people will choose more preinuim interiror and stylish exteior of CRV.
I went with the CR-V hybrid and I'm pretty impressed so far. I've have averaged 40.4 mpg in mixed driving on the computer since I got it. At my first fill-up, the calculation came to 41.2, so the on-board computer seems to be pretty accurate. It has been raining cats and dogs, so I think it might do a little better on dry roads. Having driven both the Toyota CVT and the Honda "eCVT" (I used quotes because Honda's eCVT uses no belts - it's really not a CVT in any customary use of the word) I much preferred the Honda. Plus, the current iteration of the Toyota is becoming very dated while the CRV is fresh.
@Bruce Wayne most recently I've been between getting between 44 and 46.5 calculated at the pump (the on-board computer consistently reads a little less). I doubt it'll get much better than that, and I'm perfectly happy with a midsized AWD SUV with this fuel economy. I hope it'll do at or around 40 this summer when I'm on some road trips with my whitewater kayak on top.
Rav4 all the way and non turbo. Rav4 overall reliability. Crv is not reliable with 1.5 turbo engine oil dilution and with timing belt. Rav4 has timing chain it will last longer than crv
I looked at both. The Honda feels like it has a lot more room and less blind spots. I don’t like Toyota’s subscription stuff either. Spend $40,000, but you have spend more to use features it has built in already. No thank you!
Why the new CR-V have the exhaust in the front ? that is ugly, I know that’s the fog light 😛😛 even RAV-4 too the design is ugly in front got to much bird nest 🪺🪹 also the CR-V . Is only make the place for the dust and hard job to wash and clean if rain comes and the RAV-4 design at the back looks like layer cake’s and the tires also got black plaster, so many black plaster, make RAV-4 like cheaper class come on RAV-4 make elegant and beautiful design no need to many accessories inside and outside interior, make it simple design but look elegant and high class 🤔🤔
Honda looks way way better and it feels better, but I will keep Toyota all day due to the fact no CVT transmission instead regular 8 speed transmission
I've been deciding between these two for my next vehicle. It's really tough but at the end of the day the Rav4 has the most features for the price which makes it a better value for me. If CRV had those features available I would pick CRV with no hesitation.
Alright fellas, you've done it again! Another fantastic automotive comparison, between. The Rav-4 hybrid and the all new CR-V hybrid!! It's not an easy choice, regarding which one I think is better. The Rav-4 has more horsepower, but I think the CR-V has more torque. The fully loaded price is less with the CR-V, but the Rav-4 has more options like heated rear seats. Overall, both are great SUV'S!! Thanks again guys!!👍🏾
That CRV has the aggressive look that I love . I saw this vehicle in person while getting my Accord serviced . Let me tell you , that thing is so beautiful in glossy black . Very nice looking vehicle. I fell in love with it .
Yes that black really caught my eye and i was only driving past the dealership in my 2015 Camry not thinking about a new car. Then boom here i am looking at buying this suv lol
Great comparison video Wait! The RAV4 in your video had LED Front Turn Signals! WTH?! Let me get off the floor !!! Omg. Is this all trim levels or just what you tested? Now if we can get the rear turn signals to become LED !!! I would be helpful to have ground clearance comparisons And turning radius comparisons in all of your videos Thank you
There's NO Comparison. Rav4 is #1 selling and that's all you need to know. You DO NOT want CR-V Turbo Engine and CVT Transmission. Rav4 doesn't have Turbo Engine and CVT Transmission.
Both are amazing cars. Honda has bigger cabin and looks better. But the toyota/lexus hybrid system is unmatched in reliability. We went Rav4 because we take weekend roadtips two times a month, drive about 3k miles a month, and in the end, we just wanted an efficient vehicle that will work with no issues for years to come.
I've noticed that Toyota aswell as Lexus have auto start by pressing the lock button three times but choose not advertise it guessing that they want people to use their app
I have both but I feel rav4 is little luxurious for long distance traveling.I drove 2 days from Pennsylvania to Northern Carolina and back.I feel comfortable with rav4 than crv.But it’s personal choice 2022
Fog lamps are being discontinued in Hondas lineup as well as Toyotas slowly because of how powerful led headlights are. Fog lights don’t do a whole lot anymore
Really like the side by side comparisons on split screens! I test drove both these in 2024 models and I went for the nicer driving experience of the CRV (Sport L). Also, the RAV4 looks a bit dated now. Maybe the 2025 will have a sharper design. It would be nice to have a spare tire, though, Honda!
Lack of a spare tire on the highest trim is really stupid, I've had several flats on my 2021 crv, and the inability to change your tire just ruins your whole day dealing with tow trucks and tire repair shops
BIG ZONK for the 2023 CR-V...... 1. No fog lights 2. No Panaromic sunroof 3.No levers to put down the back seats 3. No USB in the back seats. 4. Only 2 way Lumbar seat. Is this what Honda calling UPGRADE ??? Very disappointing !! I think ill keep my 2021 AWD CR-V, which is more SEXIER than the piece of crap 2023 model !!
Rav4 is good but i think CR-V deserve a more point for It's AWD system, performance, & as we all know Honda's brakes are better than Toyota . Also Honda added a New driving Mode in CR-V. CR-V has the remote start. The Exterior design Rav4 doesn’t look as premium as CR-V & also CR-V's interior cavin looks more fresh and modern than the Rav4. Rav4 Has the fully digital gauge Cluster | CR-V has the half digital & and half analog but i think it looks little bit premium than the Rav4, ( personal opinion)
Would definitely go with the RAV4 for all the upscale features (cooled seats, pano moonroof, surround view camera) that aren’t even options on the CR-V.
I rented a gas ‘22 RAV4 for 3 months. (I drive a full size truck). Brakes and handling were excellent. I avg’d 28 mpg - reaching 35 Hwy. Four cyl was buzzy and had a delay on initial throttle input but ride was excellent. Cargo space was good, interior space adequate for my 6’ - 3” frame. I just wish the hatch opening was taller. Interior quality really good and ergonomics were first rate. Dash lighting was very good, cloth seats comfortable. I’d get the faster hybrid with 40 mpg city. Rav4 has more features than the new Honda, another good car. RAV4’s small screen, base radio connected to my iPhone effortlessly and sound was surprisingly good. I recommend renting any car you’re thinking of buying. The rav4 is a very good crossover. 👍
@David Each yet What I did was I hit the throttle before I took off to get the revs up. There might be a chip you can install that will change a setting in the computer. I’d contact a few of those performance companies who may make a tune for the rav4. Banks has a product called “pedal monster” which changes computer settings so the throttle is instantaneous. The vehicle feels faster but might not be faster. Look into it. If I had a diesel, I’d get it. TH-cam videos seem to like the unit. The RAV4 is a good veh.
We’ve been testing both vehicles and decided on XLE premium RAV4. My wife can’t handle the orange stitching in sport models. The only hybrid option in CRV is a sport. RAV4 has several trim levels with hybrid option. The CRV is bigger on inside, I think RAV is still a better option.
Overall, I'd have to go with the Toyota. Toyota has got hybrids down to a fine art as evidenced by it's greater efficiency. I know that the CRV has more cargo space on paper but in the video, the CRV's cargo floor didn't look as open. There were structures intruding from both sides of the car that looked like they might interfere with loading some items. There's one thing you did in your comparison that most folks do in these kinds of videos. You gave the CRV extra points because it has larger diameter wheels. Within limits, that's ok but most times, I'm not impressed with having the largest wheels no matter what, especially on an SUV style vehicle.
Honda needs to offer more amenities in the class for the price...that's my biggest complaint..No cooled seats on the highest trim level..where's the fog lights ??? 2021 hybrid has LED fog lights built in...Honda why not a full lcd cluster ?? Seems unfinished!!! Umm.. omitted drivers seat pocket for $39k ??? Unfortunate omissions for the price point...that said Honda is my pick
I owned crv, civic, acura, ridgeline, all got no any problem . My neighbour has camry and rav 4 ,complaint about burning oil on both ! I would pick crv again for sure.
![[Full Episode] The Restaurant War Thailand ศึกพ่อค้าซ่าแม่ค้าแซ่บ Episode 2 | 29 ก.ย. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/r3lfLNH6Ke4/mqdefault.jpg)
Cant go wrong with either of these excellent cars. RAV4 has some advantages: 1. Spare tire, 2. Panoramic roof option, 3. Ventilated seats, 4. Rear camera is better, and perhaps most important of all 5. Better fuel economy. CRV has 1. More interior space, 2. More cargo space, and (subjective) 3. Better looks
Imo, that Rav-4 still looks better
Honda servicing fee more expensive that Toyota.
I also like the 2 year complimentary maintenance saves you $$$ in this inflation. Thank you Toyota and Honda 👌
I’m shocked that the Honda does not have a spare tire. What happens if you get a flat?
@@joannego856 they include an emergency inflation device on the left side of the trunk.
I like the tech in the RAV4 but the CR-V looks like a good place to spend time: comfy leather seats, rich sound quality, spaciousness, not to mention ride and handling.
Went CRV Touring. Buying is very difficult because MSRP is not where it ends. In this market the dealers are adding mandatory accessories (low jack, door guards, wheel locks, etc and so forth) to raise margin even more. Also availability is horrible in general across the industry. No one seems to have cars on the ground ready to sell. You have to wait and only buy what has been allocated to the dealer which alienates consumers and gives you no ability to negotiate price at all. Honda had the easiest process, no market adjustments to the already HIGH msrp.
Remote start is important to me ( and I don’t want to pay a subscription!). I have ventilated seats in my old cars. Never used them. Seldom use my sun roof. Cargo space and passenger comfort, efficiency and reliability. I have owned a Rav 4 and 2 CRV. Definitely leaning to CRV.
They both have remote start
I wouldn't buy something I need a subscription for either.
@@wshaq986 Yes, but he said you have to buy a subscription for the Rav4 for it to work.
@@jamesb.armstrong5433 no you don't, it's built into the key fob, just press the lock button 3x and press and hold on the 3rd time, same for lexus. They just don't advertise it. Probably so people can buy the subscription.
@@wshaq986 I was just going by what he said in the video.
19inch rims are not a pro for the crv. Give me some sidewall and better priced tires
The CR-V looks like the Volvo CX60 which I really like 👍
It's interesting that you guys are comparing the top trim from each model, while the most popular models are usually the mid-trims.
Just don’t like the turbocharged engine on the Honda
I have a 2021 crv great on Gas better than my 2016 crv
Great review. But...So you chose not to give the CRV a point for remote start? How about the mechanical AWD system that only the CRV has... 🤔
Also thought they were a bit biased there!
Spare tires usually are only good for up to 50 miles and so is the flat fix machine, so is really a draw there. Beside the cooling seats on the Rav 4, Honda takes it. Plus the Crv's AWD system is actually a AWD with 50-50 split unlike the Rav 4.
The Rav 4 space takes a full size spare
Rav 4
CR-V all day. More upscale interior, slightly better looks, better handling, and more room. Though, I’m not sure why it’s lacking so many features.
BECAUSE IT'S HONDA!
@Prabhavathi Sivashankar Truth hurts!
Having no spare in hybrid is really dumb
Because of Acura rdx
Overall crv is way better according to the experts
Toyota wants a subscription for autostart on a $44,500 cars.... wth thats absurd.
Exactly. That’s crazy. My Honda Accord came with auto start.
Toyota RAV4 has more features: fog lights, heated and ventilated seats and better mileage so it gets my vote.
And get ready to pay for subscription for remote start 😂
Right for those you are paying a higher price. But I agree Honda should atleast offer those as an add on.
Honda dual light system IS A BUILT IN fog light. You’ll see any Honda approaching , they all have 4 lights, anytime they’re on
@@dipeshpatel7623 for decades we've lived without Remote Start. I think you will survive.
@@petersuarez651 no thanks!
For the cost of the Rav4 you can just buy a lexus or an Acura
Good luck finding a dealer that won’t mark it up by 5k
I really appreciate the side by side views. It’s extremely helpful. Thanks also for doing the decibel testing because interior noise is a key factor for me.
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed 😁
I was rooting for the CR-V until you mentioned that "ventilated seats" was only available on the Rav4.. instant win for the Rav4 in my book.
It’s already 4 grand cheaper, I feel like they could have added 1-2k for a pano roof and ventilated seats
Really bad decision from Honda on this. A pano roof, 360 camera and ventilated seats are offered by the majority of the competitors.
They’re keeping it exclusive to Acura which is honestly smart
@@joshgutierrez7380 but someone shopping for CR-V hybrid wouldn’t be cross shopping with an RDX in my opinion.
And panoramic roof for the win for the Rav4!
Honda for me. I just like the design better.
Totally agree. There's sadly no 2023 cr vs in Trinidad, just the 2017-2022 unfortunately 😞
I like the RAV4 design better.
Crv always lack asthetic design but this new gen crv looks great and aggressive
You brothers just get better and better each week!
The blue with black trim on the CRV definitely helps to remove some of its dullard characteristics. It gives me a touch of Volvo in styling(especially in the rear) and proportions. Its odd, this loaded RAV4 is only $4400 less than a Highlander Limited. Sheesh.
I think its definitely time for the RAV4 to be refreshed now.
Am a fan of Honda but I just don’t understand why they are always behind in technology. No HUD, 360 camera, ventilated seat and rear view camera in this new age. It’s just too sad….
Acura is the reason.
Everyone on earth knows best motors in the world is Toyota , ps i own Honda
Honda should add rearview mirror camera, otherwise, it looks better than Rav4, but Rav4 is still the best.
If the Honda Hybrid had more color choices for the inside and ventilated seats, I'd be all on board
The reviews paid by Toyota
@@everythinghondapro5548 Just because I prefer one of the two, that doesn't mean I'm paid by the other. I do like the CR-V redesign. Just a few small things different, I'd probably buy one tomorrow lol
You will need to find another way to ventilate your bottom…
Yes. Once you have ventilated seats it is hard to give them up!
it's true...!!!!
It is difficult to convey how much larger the new CRV is compared to the RAV4 in terms of interior space. It’s half way between the RAV4 and a Highlander. The rear seat legroom is huge!
What annoys me about the CRV is that Honda didn’t include even an option for 360 degree camera and ventilated seats. I understand that this way they could keep the price under $40K for even the top trim, but still.
Rav4 has more cargo space with rear seats up !!
Legroom is more or less same too !
@@ibrahimbashir6634 If you are referring to the current RAV4, then the CRV definitely has more rear legroom. Cargo space is similar.
360 view isn't even necessary of your a competent driver😂😂
If CR-V has 360 camera, it would have been my choice among the many cars we are looking at. Living in the city we have to maneuver through tight spaces and fast so not to block traffic. 360 camera has been the life saver. Love everything else about the new 2024 CR-V.
360 view is helps with parking, not driving @@bryanmarcia4104
Hi Car Confections Can You Make The 2023 Toyota Sienna XSE
Honda is better looking! Honda killed it. Hope to get it soon!
what about mazda cx-5 or cx-50?
They both seem to have noisy interiors, road noise. That’s my biggest complaint with my current Honda.
Both are awesome and offers some difference for different people, I love Honda products because the offer more room and still some fun...and race pedigree includes this weekend as F1 racing world champion engine supplier 2 years in a row
I think the crv deserves a point for having a mechanical AWD system
Yep, I agree.
Me too. The Toyota AWD system was noted as only providing off the line traction and not above 40 MPH.
They missed this important difference
Came here to mention that too. It's a big differentiator in driving feel over the e-awd and a big reason why the mpgs are slightly less
You have a good point. I own a new RAV4. But yes mechanical would be good.
Great comparison. Both are great vehicles that have always been competitive. We had to decide between the two back in 2009 and went with the RAV. Even though the RAV does offer more features at this point, this time we went with the CRV because one was actually available at our local dealer! We would have to wait for months for a RAV. Personally I like the looks of the new CRV better. RAV looks like some sort of transformer.
Thanks!
@@CarConfections looks outdated as f both.
"RAV looks like some sort of transformer." lol, both of these vehicles are nearly identical aesthetically...every design cue is the same...
@@puzer1 the cr-v looks significantly nicer(but beauty is in the eye of the beholder). And their interior is significantly nicer. But in my country they are also a few thousand more than the rav. We currently own a 2020 cr-v, but won't be buying another due to pricing. No interest in a rav either.
These AWD systems are different. If you live in snow country, make sure you try them out in snow before buying. My last RAV-4 was not good, even with small amounts of snow. I felt my 2018 RAV-4 did not do well in snow. Paying $40,000 for a vehicle that does not fit your needs could be an expensive mistake.
My older Audi A4 w/Quattro didn’t do well in snow. I swapped in snow tires (for Audis) and it made big difference. Just gotta swap em off when weather changes. I’d do same if I had the AWD hybrid RAV4
AWD doesn’t magically make you drive in snow perfectly… you still need good tires for the snow
I hope you guys can review the 23 RAV4 hybrid xse or limited with the bigger screens now😊
The one in the video has already larger display than those until 2022. Do the higher spec one have even bigger screens?
No, for 2022 i think the one they showed is the biggest offered but the 2023 offers a bigger one
It’s a 10.5” screen. I have a 10” screen in my truck aftermarket. It’s plenty big and I can read the screen without my glasses. The old standard 7” RAV4 screen wasn’t up to date but it connected to my iPhone 13pro every time I got into the veh. So the software on new unit should be just as good. The old radio had great sound too. I was shocked. It’s gonna be excellent.
The CRV should get 1 point for free remote start.
2022 RAV4, if you have the Audio Plus option, you can still do free remote start. However for 2023 RAV4, they got rid of the Audio Plus option… due to the new head unit. No idea if will support free remote start now. No TH-cam channels so far have gone into details to find this answer.
Mazda CX-5, KIA Sportage, hyundai Tucson 👍👍
I definitely go with RAV4,....it will stay long lasting if compare to Honda CR-V
I have a 2012 CRV that has no issues. Out Accord is 24 years old with no issues. I'm don't think that is a true statement.
Honda use CR-V transmission belt drive which is not suitable for towing while Toyota Rav-4 still use the traditional gear drive automatic transmission. People who study mechanical engineering very much can tell that the gear drive system can provide much bigger load than the belt drive system.
Well. The Toyota wins in the transmission department. The Transmssion is the scariest repair cost.
Exactly. The RAV4 has 8 spd and no turbo. It’s reliable. I drove it and had no complaints. Amazing that small cars have 8 speeds! We live in a good time.
Wrong. Toyota has bands, Honda does not. Re watch the video & listen
@@markmason5443 Toyota has an 8 spd transmission (no bands) in its gas only rav4. Their hybrids have CVTs (bands). Toyota makes one of, if not the best, CVT transmissions.
Hybrid Honda has no any transmission!
The Comparison Kings strike again. Much respect.
Thanks, Chris!
Crv won in the first min. Rav4 you have to pay a mo. subscription to use the remote start. That you already payed for when buying the suv. I will never buy a vehicle from a co. That is that greedy! They cost enough already.
I really wanted the RAV4, but they were 5-7K above MSRP, so I ended up getting the CRV, which isn't a bad vehicle, but I like all the technology the RAV4 comes with.
Two great vehicles. Choose the one that suits you. (If a spare tire can’t be added, I wouldn’t buy a CR-V.)
Got the 2023 RAV4 base trim and I absolutely love it. Don't need anything fancy, and I appreciate how you actually get to use keyed entry/cranking.
Honda drop the ball with this one
I just bought a 2020 Rav4 XLE. My wife bought a 2021 CRV HYbrid XLE a few months ago. Crazy but I get to try both and still love the Rav 4. My fear with a Hybrid is still teh problems of batteries and cost of changing them, my CONventional Rav 4 gets great mileage when compared to most any Gas powered SUV, I get power and still about 26 city and I have not had it on a long drive as I just bought it two weeks ago. I also did not like the Electric push buttong Transmission and am surprised Honda went back to the old Stick SHifting feel. The ability to pull a stick into gear sold me and was a major reason I did not go with a Honda. I also found that both are still hard to find USed and Longo Toyota (worlds largest car dealership) says they will not take anymore new orders as they already are backed up 2 years of orders. THey told me TOyota did not increase their produciton after COVID and is behind. So, I hope to be able to find a 2023 Rav 4 in about 3 years to buy. In any case, buying a Used Rav 4 or CRV, regardless of trim is expensive and usually minimum of $3000 more than the car cost when new. I can't even imagine the problem with buying a new TOyota and have no idea what buying a new CRV is like. One last thought is that the quality is great and they both are rated to run over 250,000 miles. It is hard to beat that, I was a BMW owner until I saw the Japanese by far beat them in Quality for price and length of time their products stay on the road.
The RAV4 is not $4k better than the CR-V... with that said, both are great vehicles.
I think Toyota RAV4 is better than Honda CR-V.
I tested both. CRV EXL is much better and looks beautiful. Rav 4 is too plasticky, cheap looking and feels lighter while driving.
How come Toyota likes plastic so much??
How they handle on rougher road and off-road situations is really what I am interested in and the only reason I am considering an SUV as I am into going off the beaten path for outdoor adventures. None of that was discussed unfortunately. The missing spare tire on the Honda CR-V would definitely be a disqualifier though. I have had too many flat tires in remote locations with no cell-signals.
Neither vehicle is what you'd call an off-roader. Better off with a Jeep, Bronco, or 4Runner.
@@gcb345 99% of the time I will be driving on standard roads so gas mileage is important too. So is reliability. That pretty much excludes those 3.
@@Uncommonsensetoo rav4 adventure model? The hybrid needs to have an a-trac like mechanism and it would be perfect. You could look at subaru also. Theres aftermarket rear lockers for those.
If thats a concern you can purchase a spare at a tire center. Much cheaper than dealer.
I can not believe Honda didn't come up with 1. Actual spare tire 2. Panoramic Moon roof! How 'stodgy'!! If it weren't for those two items, I would flat out buy the Honda! But I am now going with a different model all together!
Honda better Toyota because the Honda make the engine and suspension and use material expensive than Toyota that why Honda for sure better
Why didn't the CRV get at least a half point for auto start on the key without paying for a subscription that Toyota charges?
I was thinking the same.
The Toyota actually does have the auto start on the key fob aswell by pressing the lock button three times but they don't advertise it for some reason and most people won't know until figuring it out
Toyota offers remote start as a standard feature with the smart key system. You press the lock button twice and press and hold the lock button a 3rd time and it starts right up.
I have a 2020 CR-V EX-L, and I love it. It’s the first car that I’m seriously considering a lease buy-out. I’ve been looking at hybrid vehicles this time (lease ends in July), but the residual value of my CR-V too good to pass up, compared to the new car prices which are ridiculous! When I was in the market for a new car in 2020, I considered the RAV-4, but I just couldn’t get past the cheap interior feel and the over-all cheap looking exterior. The same is true this year.
Honda CRV hybrid will kill over priced and markup rav4 hyrbid. Toyota you are not the only reliable hybrid SUV anymore. Most people will choose more preinuim interiror and stylish exteior of CRV.
I went with the CR-V hybrid and I'm pretty impressed so far. I've have averaged 40.4 mpg in mixed driving on the computer since I got it. At my first fill-up, the calculation came to 41.2, so the on-board computer seems to be pretty accurate. It has been raining cats and dogs, so I think it might do a little better on dry roads. Having driven both the Toyota CVT and the Honda "eCVT" (I used quotes because Honda's eCVT uses no belts - it's really not a CVT in any customary use of the word) I much preferred the Honda. Plus, the current iteration of the Toyota is becoming very dated while the CRV is fresh.
@Bruce Wayne most recently I've been between getting between 44 and 46.5 calculated at the pump (the on-board computer consistently reads a little less). I doubt it'll get much better than that, and I'm perfectly happy with a midsized AWD SUV with this fuel economy. I hope it'll do at or around 40 this summer when I'm on some road trips with my whitewater kayak on top.
@BruceWayne-sz3th Hybrid... SUV!
Rav4 all the way and non turbo. Rav4 overall reliability. Crv is not reliable with 1.5 turbo engine oil dilution and with timing belt. Rav4 has timing chain it will last longer than crv
I would pick the CRV, even tho it's missing some features
I looked at both. The Honda feels like it has a lot more room and less blind spots. I don’t like Toyota’s subscription stuff either. Spend $40,000, but you have spend more to use features it has built in already. No thank you!
Why the new CR-V have the exhaust in the front ?
that is ugly, I know that’s the fog light 😛😛
even RAV-4 too the design is ugly in front got to much bird nest 🪺🪹 also the CR-V . Is only make the place for the dust and hard job to wash and clean if rain comes
and the RAV-4 design at the back looks like layer cake’s and the tires also got black plaster, so many black plaster, make RAV-4 like cheaper class
come on RAV-4 make elegant and beautiful design no need to many accessories inside and outside interior, make it simple design but look elegant and high class 🤔🤔
Am I the only one that doesnt like how new CRV looks.
Honda looks way way better and it feels better, but I will keep Toyota all day due to the fact no CVT transmission instead regular 8 speed transmission
I've been deciding between these two for my next vehicle. It's really tough but at the end of the day the Rav4 has the most features for the price which makes it a better value for me. If CRV had those features available I would pick CRV with no hesitation.
Rav4 is a 6 year old model this is its last year. Crv is a new totally redesigned model.
@@longle6167 that’s means Honda should be disappointed in itself for costing more with less features vs a 6yr old design
What features does the rav have over the CR-V?
Always bought Honda. They feel better and look better to me. Toyota is good but they are still stuck in 2013 with designs.
Alright fellas, you've done it again! Another fantastic automotive comparison, between. The Rav-4 hybrid and the all new CR-V hybrid!! It's not an easy choice, regarding which one I think is better. The Rav-4 has more horsepower, but I think the CR-V has more torque. The fully loaded price is less with the CR-V, but the Rav-4 has more options like heated rear seats. Overall, both are great SUV'S!! Thanks again guys!!👍🏾
Thanks for watching! 😁
In my opinion CR-V is more safe and comfortable than RAV4. But RAV4 has more options.
Yea CR-V really sticks with best comfort in class. After all, you spend the most time in the cabin and its the more upscale feeling one imo
CR-V looks like a BMW X5 kinda
The CR-V has gas struts for the hood. That's worth 1/2 point!
Rav4 Prime XSE would leave honda in the dust
Rav4 awd system is horrible, many videos showing the rear wheel drive not activating or barely active. Subaru for me.
That CRV has the aggressive look that I love . I saw this vehicle in person while getting my Accord serviced . Let me tell you , that thing is so beautiful in glossy black . Very nice looking vehicle. I fell in love with it .
Yes that black really caught my eye and i was only driving past the dealership in my 2015 Camry not thinking about a new car. Then boom here i am looking at buying this suv lol
That crv is looking more uglier than the last model. RAV4 fan
Great comparison video
Wait! The RAV4 in your video had LED Front Turn Signals! WTH?!
Let me get off the floor !!!
Omg. Is this all trim levels or just what you tested? Now if we can get the rear turn signals to become LED !!!
I would be helpful to have ground clearance comparisons
And turning radius comparisons in all of your videos
Thank you
There's NO Comparison. Rav4 is #1 selling and that's all you need to know. You DO NOT want CR-V Turbo Engine and CVT Transmission. Rav4 doesn't have Turbo Engine and CVT Transmission.
You know Honda CVTs are reliable right? They aren’t Nissans
Honda looks fire! 🔥
That bottom grille portion of the CR-V with those silver fake vent cutouts is hideous. They should've just kept it clean without it.
Both are amazing cars. Honda has bigger cabin and looks better. But the toyota/lexus hybrid system is unmatched in reliability. We went Rav4 because we take weekend roadtips two times a month, drive about 3k miles a month, and in the end, we just wanted an efficient vehicle that will work with no issues for years to come.
Honda for me
CR-V for me! Can't wait for them to come out. This will be my 4th CR-V. Keeping my '15 since it is paid off.
Lol, my family has a 2007 and a 2014, I will buy the 2023 and give the 2007 to my daughter soon!
I've noticed that Toyota aswell as Lexus have auto start by pressing the lock button three times but choose not advertise it guessing that they want people to use their app
I have both but I feel rav4 is little luxurious for long distance traveling.I drove 2 days from Pennsylvania to Northern Carolina and back.I feel comfortable with rav4 than crv.But it’s personal choice
2022
Fog lamps are being discontinued in Hondas lineup as well as Toyotas slowly because of how powerful led headlights are. Fog lights don’t do a whole lot anymore
The crv is wider right and longer? Maybe half a point for that ? Haha
Love your split-screen edit to compare things instantaneously 🙂
Glad you liked it! Thanks 😁
Really like the side by side comparisons on split screens! I test drove both these in 2024 models and I went for the nicer driving experience of the CRV (Sport L). Also, the RAV4 looks a bit dated now. Maybe the 2025 will have a sharper design. It would be nice to have a spare tire, though, Honda!
Lack of a spare tire on the highest trim is really stupid, I've had several flats on my 2021 crv, and the inability to change your tire just ruins your whole day dealing with tow trucks and tire repair shops
Naaa.None of these! I will go for the new Honda Accord.
BIG ZONK for the 2023 CR-V...... 1. No fog lights 2. No Panaromic sunroof 3.No levers to put down the back seats 3. No USB in the back seats. 4. Only 2 way Lumbar seat. Is this what Honda calling UPGRADE ??? Very disappointing !! I think ill keep my 2021 AWD CR-V, which is more SEXIER than the piece of crap 2023 model !!
I like the new Honda Crv!
No point for subscription free remote start on key fob for CRV?
Agreed.
Rav4 is good but i think CR-V deserve a more point for It's AWD system, performance, & as we all know Honda's brakes are better than Toyota . Also Honda added a New driving Mode in CR-V. CR-V has the remote start.
The Exterior design Rav4 doesn’t look as premium as CR-V & also CR-V's interior cavin looks more fresh and modern than the Rav4.
Rav4 Has the fully digital gauge Cluster | CR-V has the half digital & and half analog but i think it looks little bit premium than the Rav4, ( personal opinion)
No Panoramic roof, no ventilated seats, and no HUD is what make the CR-V undesirable, IMO.
Would definitely go with the RAV4 for all the upscale features (cooled seats, pano moonroof, surround view camera) that aren’t even options on the CR-V.
What about the cable corrosion problem that plagues the RAV4 hybrid. Has it been solved?
I rented a gas ‘22 RAV4 for 3 months. (I drive a full size truck). Brakes and handling were excellent. I avg’d 28 mpg - reaching 35 Hwy. Four cyl was buzzy and had a delay on initial throttle input but ride was excellent. Cargo space was good, interior space adequate for my 6’ - 3” frame. I just wish the hatch opening was taller. Interior quality really good and ergonomics were first rate. Dash lighting was very good, cloth seats comfortable. I’d get the faster hybrid with 40 mpg city. Rav4 has more features than the new Honda, another good car. RAV4’s small screen, base radio connected to my iPhone effortlessly and sound was surprisingly good. I recommend renting any car you’re thinking of buying. The rav4 is a very good crossover. 👍
@@louis5555gmail that cable problem and reading about the Canadian owners' class action lawsuit has turned me away from the hybrid RAV4
@@louis5555gmail it has been resolved! Since 2022 they have had the issue addressed 😎👍
@David Each yet What I did was I hit the throttle before I took off to get the revs up. There might be a chip you can install that will change a setting in the computer. I’d contact a few of those performance companies who may make a tune for the rav4. Banks has a product called “pedal monster” which changes computer settings so the throttle is instantaneous. The vehicle feels faster but might not be faster. Look into it. If I had a diesel, I’d get it. TH-cam videos seem to like the unit. The RAV4 is a good veh.
We’ve been testing both vehicles and decided on XLE premium RAV4. My wife can’t handle the orange stitching in sport models. The only hybrid option in CRV is a sport. RAV4 has several trim levels with hybrid option. The CRV is bigger on inside, I think RAV is still a better option.
I’m glad I’m not the only one that can’t get past the orange stitching!!’ 😂😂
Overall, I'd have to go with the Toyota. Toyota has got hybrids down to a fine art as evidenced by it's greater efficiency. I know that the CRV has more cargo space on paper but in the video, the CRV's cargo floor didn't look as open. There were structures intruding from both sides of the car that looked like they might interfere with loading some items. There's one thing you did in your comparison that most folks do in these kinds of videos. You gave the CRV extra points because it has larger diameter wheels. Within limits, that's ok but most times, I'm not impressed with having the largest wheels no matter what, especially on an SUV style vehicle.
I'm going with the rav4.
Make sure you dont live in an area that doesn’t salt roads. I was going for the RAV4 until I found out about the cable corrosion issue.
RAV-4, Honda overpriced.
Definitely into the crv more but both great options!
Honda needs to offer more amenities in the class for the price...that's my biggest complaint..No cooled seats on the highest trim level..where's the fog lights ??? 2021 hybrid has LED fog lights built in...Honda why not a full lcd cluster ?? Seems unfinished!!! Umm.. omitted drivers seat pocket for $39k ??? Unfortunate omissions for the price point...that said Honda is my pick
I owned crv, civic, acura, ridgeline, all got no any problem . My neighbour has camry and rav 4 ,complaint about burning oil on both ! I would pick crv again for sure.
Toyota RAV4 hybrid will always be better than the Honda Crv
I will not pay a monthly fee to use a function on a car I own. I’d rather keep buying used cars u til I die. I’m in my 50s so I can do that. 😂
Toyota also has port injection with direct injection. Eliminating direct injection headaches .
RAV4 and Corolla are too cramped in the rear seat and storage compared to CRV and Civic.