This movie truly was a palindrome. I was confused at the beginning, eventually started to piece stuff together, reached the highest level of understanding at the halfway point, gradually became confused again until, by the time we got to this battle, my entire brain was on Airplane mode.
@@marco-me1uh too much introspection for you ? would you rather watch a simplified and linear plot like fast and furious? or too hard to process? let me guess? you don't like watching the same movie more than once to analyse it do you? you want a quick random cheesy action scene and that's all?
Hell no, there’s WAY more complex things happening all over the movie. The movie is WAY more than just than scene as the time inversion concept has been fleshed out massively throughout the movie. Nolan knows what he’s doing here, it’s just that he knows it will confuse some people here as the whole thing is not easy to grasp at first viewing. Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
Very close! He found the "Sator square" and decided to make an entire movie about that singular block of clay with letters in it. Seriously, go look it up and the entire plot of the movie is in that square.
I was about to comment something like this as well and notice there are no dead body's anywhere you would think this type of battle would have casualties. i thought it was a training thing they were doing before they did the actual mission this movie was so confusing.
yeah when I saw snippets of this battle before watching the movie I actually thought the protag’s team was actually fighting against the reversed team, which should’ve made sense because both teams are color coded and you hardly see any of the bad guy’s mercs anywhere other than like 1 or 2 bodies.
For those wondering who they're shooting at: 0:34 Grenade thrown at enemies 0:43 Soldiers on hill 1:26 Inverted enemies 1:40 Inverted enemy with bazooka 2:20 Enemy helicopter 2:29 Dead enemy 2:38 "Splinter unit" 2:55 Enemies in and around building
Enymies are not inverted, only red groups are inverted. Red group can identify enimies exact location as they are coming from future. So they can attack enimies before they shoot or using granade. So no casualities in blue group
@@maxrockatansky5657 The red group are not inverted. Everything in the film says that red means forward, blue means back. They even say before the battle that there are inverted enemies and weapons.
@@hexagonproductions2019 Correct. Don’t pay attention to the low IQ people who can’t understand this movie despite the plot being explained quite clearly. I do not understand the hate this movie received, I thought it was fantastic.
That's because it's terrible and makes no sense..... Christopher Nolan worst movies... He tries to use themes and ideas from his previous movies interstellar and inception.....and tries to make a smart cunning movie but unfortunately he couldn't come up with a convincing plot this time so most of it is nonsense.
Sounds crazy but that's what you want to do. He threw it in the trench so no shrapnel coming his way. The guys on the receiving end take cover, stopping fire, to evade the grenade, allowing our good guy to move closer unchallenged. For example go watch FNG academy real green beret footage, an insurgent use this same tactics on the green beret guys and move them out of position.
@@1Sacfi Are you referring to the "Close Call" combat footage? Because the event that you described did not happen in that video. What happened was, US guys threw a grenade over the wall hoping that the insurgent would back off, but he instead pushed up against the wall which caught everybody by surprise. Then the US dudes decide to retreat because assaulting that area is fucked. Some ANA guy who was supposed to be covering their retreat, engages the insurgent at point blank at proceeds to run away leaving everybody vulnerable. There was no running towards a grenade because that is a very unwise thing to do.
@@AriknotErik that’s not it. It’s likely true that the piece was from Stalsk 12 as the only major gunfight where there were this many inverted bullets was here, but that’s not the piece here.
That firefight felt so strange when I first watched it, everybody running at each other no taking cover, I felt like I'm watching a huge scale paintball game. With that being said it looks great and that is what important.
Why would they take cover? The enemies are coming back in time from the future and you have to shoot them the instant that they reach you in time. If you fail to do this they will continue going back in time and kill you earlier; if you kill them earlier instead then you don't get to see them in the "true" "timeline," because at the instant you killed them they ceased to go back further in time. You then see them alive afterwards
That's kind of the point in a way - all the events in the film are predestined, the whole "protagonist" name is an allusion to the fact that he has no control over his fate in the story.
This is because both sides know the blue team has achieved its objective. The goal is not to kill as many as possible, but create conditions which allow key agents to succeed. It's hard to imagine how such a war would be carried out, but it is possible you just run from position to position knowing strays won't hit you (as told to you by the blue team), while occasionally returning fire.
I think the reason why they were all running while shooting with no formation at all is, they only have 10 minutes to complete their mission. Thus, rushing to the objective. Also, the enemies they were shooting are Russian forces with white uniforms and chest rigs. Keep in mind that the blue team, red team and the enemies are in different time. They're shooting the enemies in the past and future. Either way, that's just my point of view, you may have different answers.
It’s not supposed to because it’s all quick movement and action as the tenet troops are shooting at the enemy in the future and in the past. It’s highly complex to grasp but it makes complete sense and it’s rewarding when you figure it all out! Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
No they didn’t “completely enveloped an enemy platoon than walk by it” that’s how I know you don’t get the scene and what’s it’s trying to do. It’s hard to understand I know but it makes sense overall. You only say that because they are shooting people in the future and in the past who are present and NOT present. There are multiple events happening all at once happening in this scene. It’s not supposed to because it’s all quick movement and action as the tenet troops are shooting at the enemy in the future and in the past. It’s highly complex to grasp but it makes complete sense and it’s rewarding when you figure it all out! Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
They get they’re tactics perfectly because it’s an inverted time war in which it’s supposed to look confusing and havoc like. it’s all quick movement and action as the tenet troops are shooting at the enemy in the future and in the past. It’s highly complex to grasp but it makes complete sense and it’s rewarding when you figure it all out! Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
@@FormerGovernmentHuman No they didn’t “completely enveloped an enemy platoon than walk by it” that’s how I know you don’t get the scene and what’s it’s trying to do. It’s hard to understand I know but it makes sense overall. You only say that because they are shooting people in the future and in the past who are present and NOT present. There are multiple events happening all at once happening in this scene. It’s not supposed to because it’s all quick movement and action as the tenet troops are shooting at the enemy in the future and in the past. It’s highly complex to grasp but it makes complete sense and it’s rewarding when you figure it all out! Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
No their tactics are smart and clever in what they’re trying to do and accomplish do to the time inversion there in. You mocking in They’re not just “all running at once in a massive clump” that’s nonsense and completely foolish to say if your don’t understand the purpose of they’re movement as they’re fighting people in the FUTURE in specific movements and sequences they have to go by. Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
They got they’re tactics for professionals on how to do a time travel war fight. I REALLY wished you people realize how well thought out and smart/clever this movie really is because Nolan did something reality special with it all as the tactics in this movie were incredibly smart and thought out extremely well. No seriously for all people, Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly. It’s massively rewarding when you figure it all out and see how the tactics and strategies used on this fight and movie are all fantastic well thought out and planned! You “wonder” not with that nonsense sarcastic snarky reply, because it’s nonsense and foolish to say and utter out. They got they’re tactics from PROFESSIONALS and using it all like professionals when you understand everything what’s going on. Please do. It’s rewarding when you figure it all out!
This is one of the most amazing special/practical effect movies I’ve ever seen. The opera scene, the car chase, the plane crash, inverted fight sequence . Amazing .
1:38 - What the hell was that (presumably inverted) enemy RPG guy experiencing? From their point of view, Red Team shoots at him AFTER his reversed rocket attack , so from his perspective, he started out dead/blown up, "reassembled," and then fired a rocket at the Red Team
No, that would be a paradox. One cannot “start out dead.” The film sets up two rules: mortal wounds travel in the direction of the target, and non-mortal wounds travel in the direction of the cause of the wound. In this case, the cause of the wound is Red Team’s non-inverted RPG, and the target is Sator’s inverted-mercenary. Because, in forward-time, the inverted-mercenary unfired the inverted-RPG and then was subsequently hit with Red Team’s forward-RPG, that means that the inverted-mercenary must have survived Red Team’s RPG. The reason for this is because, following the Mortal Wound Law, if the inverted-mercenary did die from Red Team’s RPG, then from Red Team’s forward point of view, they would have ran up to the concrete wall, the inverted-mercenary would have been laying “lifeless” inside the building, and as Red Team fired their RPG at the building, the inverted-mercenary would have “sprung up to life” upon contact with the RPG and THEN proceeded to unfire an inverted-RPG from the concrete wall Red Team is at. But, as we know, that is not how it played out in the movie. In the film, Red Team runs up to the concrete wall, the inverted-mercenary unfires an inverted-RPG from the wall, and then Red Team shoots a forward-RPG at the inverted-mercenary. Thus, the inverted-mercenary’s wound had to have been non-mortal. And, from the inverted-mercenary’s point of view, he fights in battle, and then suddenly several burns and cuts star to materialize into existence. As he moves closer and closer to the concrete building, his wounds and burns get worse and worse. When he reaches the top of the stairs, the damaged upper floor starts to “un-explode,” and suddenly the upper floor is restored and the inverted-blast “heals” the inverted-mercenary’s wounds and burns. The inverted-mercenary then notices a group of Red Team soldiers hovering behind a concrete wall, so he shoots an inverted-RPG at the wall. The Red Team soldiers then start to run backwards towards their landing zone.
@@RShadow12 Is that Mortal Wound Law thing actually established in the movie?? It's been a long time since I've seen it. At what point do they talk about it? Because if the guy would die, would he lay there dead, decomposing in reverse time forever?? Like years ago in forward time, people find a guy's rotting skeleton (well they would see it unrotting in forward time) in there laying but nobody messes with it? What happens if they mess with his dead body, remove it and dump it somewhere else? Isn't that a time paradox? Also what's the "scientific" explanation behind "mortal wound law"? It sounds silly
1:48 fun fact: for the enemy guy (if he was inverted): they shoot first with their bazooka and after he saw that he shout with his own bazooka in response. For both teams quite the same situation - both shoot with bazooka in response
1:09 judging by how awkward everyone looks while running, I'm guessing they filmed this with everybody running backwards then played it in reverse. you can even see someone from red team running backwards at the end of this shot.
No they DONT “miss every shot on helicopters hovering in place” you fool! The bullets aren’t going to effect them THEN, but effect the helicopters and enemy in the PAST and Future! That’s how I know you don’t get the scene and what’s it’s trying to do when you make this making sarcastic comment like this. It’s hard to understand I know but it makes sense overall. You only say that because they are shooting people in the future and in the past who are present and NOT present. There are multiple events happening all at once happening in this scene. Everything is inverted and the things they do have to be very precise as the shooting they are doing doesn’t directly effect them unless it’s the future and past as MULTIPLE events are happening at once. It’s not supposed to because it’s all quick movement and action as the tenet troops are shooting at the enemy in the future and in the past. It’s highly complex to grasp but it makes complete sense and it’s rewarding when you figure it all out! Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
@@coleparker5179 no it’s not “Russian arms”, there’s a reason for everything in this scene, It’s hard to understand I know but it makes sense overall. You only say that because they are shooting people in the future and in the past who are present and NOT present. There are multiple events happening all at once happening in this scene. It’s not supposed to because it’s all quick movement and action as the tenet troops are shooting at the enemy in the future and in the past. It’s highly complex to grasp but it makes complete sense and it’s rewarding when you figure it all out! Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
You laughing and posting that stupid emoji only proves your ignorance as you prove more and more you don’t know what you’re talking about as this scene is very well thought out. It’s a time inversion war, no duh things are going to look off and surreal because what they’re shooting at doesn’t effect them in the present, only in the future and past so the shot on every helicopter in “point blank range” doesn’t “miss every shot” it’s meant for something else inverted in time. That should be extremely obvious given the context of the movie. Like I said, Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
You’re a complete fool for making this foolish stupid comment and not realizing sooner on how smart it really is on and how the purpose of each scene is supposed to be. Stop laughing, your not helping any of your cases because your just not understanding what’s what.
From my understanding they were filming the scene at 1:15 by letting the red team actually move backwards? That's why the movements look strange and there is one guy actually running backwards at the left who didn't get the memo?
@@thalysnatanael Well some scenes look pretty well but there are some mistakes like the guy running backwards or the strange looking movements, so I am not sure.
The shot is being played in reverse -- you can tell by the explosion in the background, which is happening in reverse. So yes, during filming of this scene, the red-team actors were moving in reverse, hence their awkwardness. Not a very smooth take... must have been too difficult a shot to keep re-doing.
Crazy tho the blue team already knows what's going to happen to the red team and the red team already sees the aftermath and knows what happens to the blue team even tho they arrived after the red....Jesus it hurts my head thinking about it...infact I don't even think that's right...it's so hard to comprehend.
Well I feel like Nolan did that on purpose to show that since this isn’t a normal gunfight new procedures have to be put into play. Remember when Ives or whatever said they’ll have reverse antagonists and forward antagonists all at the same time 🤷♀️ idk jus a thought
Who even are they shooting at? Am I missing something? Like everyone I was confused by this movie but I'm baffled by the decision not to show the enemy's vantage point.
Honestly, I don't have issues with the opposing force not appearing much, since I've already watched Dunkirk(2017) .(To anyone who don't know the movie, a WW2 movie directed by the same guy who directed TENET where there barely visibly enemies
@@nungbear1398 Lmfao there's a gigantic difference between the movie Dunkirk, which very accurately depicted a real historical event, and this pure-fictional-fucking nonsense
@@CommanderLongJohn well it is fictional, what do you expect? What's more is that this type of movie is new and unconventional unlike normal movies, hence the confusion
I see Nolan still has the same issues he has with directing a proper massive gunfight since the dark knight, seriously? did he still think that people run around with assault rifles like in call of duty?
How were they then supposed to go to the main area(the buildings) from the place the soldiers were dropped??? After reaching the buildings the soldiers did spread out.
They only have 10 minutes to save the world. You can’t expect them to move slowly and organized. And they are in the middle of a war where people move forward and backward, the environment is chaotic and that’s what Nolan wanted to show us. Just look at TP. He runs faster then everybody in his team because he only have one goal: to reach and save the algorithm.
The blue team are the red one that happened in earlier days before. And the red team was actually going backward in days to stop the big bomb. That's why they tag themself red so that they can identify themselves. And the whole scene that was processing was actually in repeat that why we can see bombs blowing in backwards.
1:09 You maybe wondering why these soldiers here are running like this, just because they're running backwards in the original footage and the explosion behind it is real.
The only thing that bugs me with this scene is that for all of the explosions and shooting we see, we see very few enemy soldiers die. And it's especially weird when the red and blue teams just run past the enemies.
Maybe, you are trying this in the wrong universe. This is not a video game fighting movie. I think you didn't pay any attention what Ives said. This thing is just an advantage of blue team.The war isn't very important. Because, what's happend is happened. You just only have to follow the protagonist till the very end. If you want a heavyweight fighty fighty action movie you can watch other blockbuster. Not a Nolan movie. And what did you say? Nolan can't do a proper gunfight? Then, Maybe you haven't really seen Inception and Dunkirk yet. I recommend you to watch the first and third level of dream. That's the proof what Nolan can do or not.
this is true. Nolans pretty good at almost everything else except for gun scenes. But ig its just as bad as directors that give unlimited ammo to the character and hes jumping around killing everyone without even getting hit once
Im annoyed how they move in those massive groups, that could be taken out with one good explosion. Nolan was always terrible in making big scale fights like that. Eg. Police in Batman
People: *joins the army/marines to do this irl Same people: great now I have to go sweep the same side walk again. *This is just for memes I have nothing but respect for our servicemen and women*
this entire sequence suffered terribly from not showing the enemy's point of view. i dont care about whats happening if they are just going to shoot at nothing. what's funny is that dunkirk accomplished this tremendously well, but it doesn't seem to work here. i think that's because we've already seen sator and his men throughout the movie, but now they are almost absent from the scene, whereas dunkirk committed to the invisible enemy for its whole run time.
I was underwhelmed when I saw this. I was so excited to see a Nolan movie in theaters. But I ended up not hearing the dialogue or understanding anything. I also agree that in this scene, there is literally no opposing team shown anywhere.
Yea the dialogue volume was a huge deal. It’s such a confusing premise and to not hear them explaining it just makes you constantly say “what the fuck is going on?” lol
You know what's pretty cool? Watching an explosion moving in reverse! It's like it starts happening slowly, then it just stops and magically constructs something!
basically i feel like the reason they don't show much of the enemy is the fact that according to the timeline shenanigans, the blue team already relayed the important information about the battle... so red team is just following a script. I remember in the red team briefing scene right before the battle, one of the soldiers asks something like, "since we're having this briefing, doesn't that technically mean we already succeed the mission?" It's still very confusing to try and understand how it all functions.
After watching this I had to watch a “tenet explained” video. Then after that I had to watch a “tenet explained explained” video. I haven’t found a “tenet explained explained explained” video but I’m going to keep looking.
Chinook helicopters carrying sea cans.... full of troops. Thats like a school bus towing a cattle trailer full of people. Lol i must be missin something
for all of ya that didnt understand tenet when ya first watched it... then give it another try... i saw the first 30 mins and didnt understand a single thing so i just turned it off... but then i watched it again now in March... and i guess i have become smarter or something... understood most of it... overall very good movie 9/10 for the confusion rly
It feels like Nolan decided 'the way we're going to film this movie is by recording people doing stuff backwards, then reverse the video in post production' and then he retroactively invented some nonsense time travel rules in order to justify the filming technique. There's some really cool and radical ideas, like at 3:00 where this building only exists for a single second before it is destroyed both backwards and forwards in time, but when you try and actually think about the ramifications of something like that you either give up trying to rationalize it or accept that the concept is complete hogwash.
yeah, no, I do not advise charging like you're someone from WWI, just one grenade is enough to send half of your team home in a box, just one well-placed machine gun is enough to cut your charging knights on an open field in half, but hey, ill let real veterans do the real talk, I'm just here for some shits and giggles
I really dont understand why these scifi movies think those ground support helmets used by air craft maintenance crew are good for combat.. xD They are legit thin sheet of plastic
@@MS-vi9ug no shit but am talking about the helmet xD they are two separate thing. Ive used that headgear when I was in the airforce and it is not meant for combat
@@sunshineskystar That still does not justify the usage of the helmet that has no protection against bullets or shrapnels xD Think you are diverging from the main topic of this comment haha
@@reinheart14121412 It isn't plastic. It may look similar but military helmets use Kevlar. You can search up what Kevlar looks like yourself and what's its functions. Helmets also have limited bullet proof function as it only prevents stray bullets, fragments and small caliber pistols. These helmets use different material to airforce helmets.
@@Thauo91823 It is hardened plastic. That helmet is a flight deck helmet produced by David Clark. I've used it during my time in service. And yes I know how kevlar works. And no not all helmets are made of kevlar (but majority is). Helmets you probably are used to seeing on movies now days consists of Koroyd tubes. Although these tubes CAN be made of many different materials (kevlar included).
Easily one of the most poorly-executed sequences in cinematic history. Nobody knows what’s happening, the “soldiers” don’t move tactically-instead they move in giant herds, they’re shooting at nothing, you barely see the enemy forces, it’s all a giant, incoherent cluster
@@TheSealOfDeath Doesn't matter if it's done backwards in time or with n groups simultaneously, what they do is dumb. They show several soldiers throw grenades and run at them, they land in helicopters right in front of AA machine gun emplacements, you can see people on all sides take cover from seemingly random directions. I'm no expert, but paintball with friends during elementary was played more tactically than this.
![[LIVE] นาทีนี้ต้องพี่ทนาย | ทนายแก้ว vs ทนายไพศาล | #คุยให้เด็กมันฟัง EP.47 (02/11/67)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HmquaO-PL_M/mqdefault.jpg)
This movie truly was a palindrome.
I was confused at the beginning, eventually started to piece stuff together, reached the highest level of understanding at the halfway point, gradually became confused again until, by the time we got to this battle, my entire brain was on Airplane mode.
unbelievably stupid scene.
nosense movie..
This is the only movie to be seen by the world!
@@marco-me1uh too much introspection for you ? would you rather watch a simplified and linear plot like fast and furious? or too hard to process? let me guess? you don't like watching the same movie more than once to analyse it do you? you want a quick random cheesy action scene and that's all?
@@clientcomun1958 no just an action movie that’s watchable. Tenet was not even comprehensible.
I think this entire scene alone is the reason Nolan really wanted to make this movie.
you have a good point
Hell no, there’s WAY more complex things happening all over the movie. The movie is WAY more than just than scene as the time inversion concept has been fleshed out massively throughout the movie. Nolan knows what he’s doing here, it’s just that he knows it will confuse some people here as the whole thing is not easy to grasp at first viewing.
Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
unbelievably stupid scene. Must be one of the worst in cinema history it makes no sense and not because some of it is backwards lol
@@AD-zg7fw you must be fucking joking right
Yea, but why. Its the worst scene in the movie. Its like russians rushing to kiev, but with time running back on some things.
Honestly Tenet just felt like Nolan heard someone saying something like "Temporal Pincer Move" and tried making a movie around that one phrase.
I bet he got the idea for Tenet in an editing studio, moving backwards through a scene
i bet he was on the toilet and wondering what would happen if poop went back into you
@@oscarsalesgirl296 lmao
Very close! He found the "Sator square" and decided to make an entire movie about that singular block of clay with letters in it. Seriously, go look it up and the entire plot of the movie is in that square.
yeah but its pretty sick though, even if it doesnt make sense
Only problem with this scene is that they hardly show any of the opposing forces. Looks like they are shooting at nothing
I was about to comment something like this as well and notice there are no dead body's anywhere you would think this type of battle would have casualties. i thought it was a training thing they were doing before they did the actual mission this movie was so confusing.
yeah when I saw snippets of this battle before watching the movie I actually thought the protag’s team was actually fighting against the reversed team, which should’ve made sense because both teams are color coded and you hardly see any of the bad guy’s mercs anywhere other than like 1 or 2 bodies.
@BearBacca So Normal Team is shooting at the places Inverted Team will be in the future?
My thoughts exactly
@@dinoandjustdino Didn't say there weren't any
this was the most confusing movie i have ever watched
Try Primer. A very low budget, but well made time travel movie. Should brick your brain after 45 or so and keeps going ;)
@@rosch3000 ill give it a look brother
And to add to the mix the movie is called tenet which spelled excalty the same backwards 😂😂😂
@@anewf8724 i didnt even notice that LOL
Because it's literally just pure fucking nonsense that even Nolan didn't understand..
For those wondering who they're shooting at:
0:34 Grenade thrown at enemies
0:43 Soldiers on hill
1:26 Inverted enemies
1:40 Inverted enemy with bazooka
2:20 Enemy helicopter
2:29 Dead enemy
2:38 "Splinter unit"
2:55 Enemies in and around building
Enymies are not inverted, only red groups are inverted. Red group can identify enimies exact location as they are coming from future. So they can attack enimies before they shoot or using granade. So no casualities in blue group
@@maxrockatansky5657 The red group are not inverted. Everything in the film says that red means forward, blue means back. They even say before the battle that there are inverted enemies and weapons.
@@maxrockatansky5657 uh no, did you even watch the movie? This is the forward perspective
@@hexagonproductions2019 Correct. Don’t pay attention to the low IQ people who can’t understand this movie despite the plot being explained quite clearly. I do not understand the hate this movie received, I thought it was fantastic.
@@GoobleryKu Agree 100%, favorite film of 2020 by far
It's one of those movies you'll have to watch again and again to understand.
That's because it's terrible and makes no sense..... Christopher Nolan worst movies...
He tries to use themes and ideas from his previous movies interstellar and inception.....and tries to make a smart cunning movie but unfortunately he couldn't come up with a convincing plot this time so most of it is nonsense.
@@jont2576 have u watched the movie then?
@@jont2576 everything makes sense to an extent I can explain it to you in intricate detail, you just need to have the right mentality to get ut
You also have to watch the movie backwards
@@jont2576 a nolan hater
0:33 throws a grenade and runs towards it
Sounds crazy but that's what you want to do. He threw it in the trench so no shrapnel coming his way. The guys on the receiving end take cover, stopping fire, to evade the grenade, allowing our good guy to move closer unchallenged. For example go watch FNG academy real green beret footage, an insurgent use this same tactics on the green beret guys and move them out of position.
@@1Sacfi Are you referring to the "Close Call" combat footage? Because the event that you described did not happen in that video. What happened was, US guys threw a grenade over the wall hoping that the insurgent would back off, but he instead pushed up against the wall which caught everybody by surprise. Then the US dudes decide to retreat because assaulting that area is fucked. Some ANA guy who was supposed to be covering their retreat, engages the insurgent at point blank at proceeds to run away leaving everybody vulnerable. There was no running towards a grenade because that is a very unwise thing to do.
🤣🤣🤣
@superdiskboi k i t k a t
That's why you have offensive and defensive hand grenades
My brain stopped working in this scene.
Same here brother
The CGI team and effects must have had a really bad day making this part.
there isnt any CGI lamo
They'll doing fine, it's the editor that wants to die
@@Kevin-fj5oe i just said there isnt any CGI. so there no CGI Artists
There's no cgi, Nolan filmed all the scene backward and reverse them either the inverted and not inverted.
@@davyjones5068 1:46 That was a real rocket?
1:05 Machinegunner's wet dream.
hahahahaha
WW1 in a nutshell
Also for artillery
literally one well-placed MG42 and that entire assault would be ruined
It's a war scene where a group move backwards from future and the other one forward as normal. Simple logic
It explains it in the movie but people just can’t grasp it for some reason.
nerd alert
2:01 that wall piece that Protagonist flips on, is the same wall piece the lady he met at the beginning of the film got the reverse bullets from.
No
@@joemanner6171 Look at the piece, the shape, the color. And then look at the piece that lady has earlier in the film
Yes
in reverse bullet scene, piece is damaged square, corners cut etc. in this scene it looks like a trapezoid.
@@AriknotErik that’s not it. It’s likely true that the piece was from Stalsk 12 as the only major gunfight where there were this many inverted bullets was here, but that’s not the piece here.
That firefight felt so strange when I first watched it, everybody running at each other no taking cover, I felt like I'm watching a huge scale paintball game. With that being said it looks great and that is what important.
I think the reason they keep running without taking cover is because of their time limit they were given
Why would they take cover? The enemies are coming back in time from the future and you have to shoot them the instant that they reach you in time. If you fail to do this they will continue going back in time and kill you earlier; if you kill them earlier instead then you don't get to see them in the "true" "timeline," because at the instant you killed them they ceased to go back further in time. You then see them alive afterwards
That's kind of the point in a way - all the events in the film are predestined, the whole "protagonist" name is an allusion to the fact that he has no control over his fate in the story.
This is because both sides know the blue team has achieved its objective. The goal is not to kill as many as possible, but create conditions which allow key agents to succeed.
It's hard to imagine how such a war would be carried out, but it is possible you just run from position to position knowing strays won't hit you (as told to you by the blue team), while occasionally returning fire.
I think the reason why they were all running while shooting with no formation at all is, they only have 10 minutes to complete their mission. Thus, rushing to the objective. Also, the enemies they were shooting are Russian forces with white uniforms and chest rigs. Keep in mind that the blue team, red team and the enemies are in different time. They're shooting the enemies in the past and future. Either way, that's just my point of view, you may have different answers.
an invasive military strategy called shock and awe
When you realize he’s basically never looking through his sight
Well it's very hard to get a proper cheek weld with a gas mask on to even look down your optic
Gas mask, and point shooting is a thing lol
Aim bot? Deactivate his account
It’s not supposed to because it’s all quick movement and action as the tenet troops are shooting at the enemy in the future and in the past. It’s highly complex to grasp but it makes complete sense and it’s rewarding when you figure it all out!
Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
No they didn’t “completely enveloped an enemy platoon than walk by it” that’s how I know you don’t get the scene and what’s it’s trying to do. It’s hard to understand I know but it makes sense overall. You only say that because they are shooting people in the future and in the past who are present and NOT present. There are multiple events happening all at once happening in this scene.
It’s not supposed to because it’s all quick movement and action as the tenet troops are shooting at the enemy in the future and in the past. It’s highly complex to grasp but it makes complete sense and it’s rewarding when you figure it all out!
Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
I like the architecture...
It's like Detroit after Tigers won World Series in 84
I just wonder where these guys get there tactics from, all running at once in a massive clump.
My favorite tactic was when they had completely enveloped an enemy platoon and then, walked on by.
They get they’re tactics perfectly because it’s an inverted time war in which it’s supposed to look confusing and havoc like. it’s all quick movement and action as the tenet troops are shooting at the enemy in the future and in the past. It’s highly complex to grasp but it makes complete sense and it’s rewarding when you figure it all out!
Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
@@FormerGovernmentHuman No they didn’t “completely enveloped an enemy platoon than walk by it” that’s how I know you don’t get the scene and what’s it’s trying to do. It’s hard to understand I know but it makes sense overall. You only say that because they are shooting people in the future and in the past who are present and NOT present. There are multiple events happening all at once happening in this scene.
It’s not supposed to because it’s all quick movement and action as the tenet troops are shooting at the enemy in the future and in the past. It’s highly complex to grasp but it makes complete sense and it’s rewarding when you figure it all out!
Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
No their tactics are smart and clever in what they’re trying to do and accomplish do to the time inversion there in. You mocking in
They’re not just “all running at once in a massive clump” that’s nonsense and completely foolish to say if your don’t understand the purpose of they’re movement as they’re fighting people in the FUTURE in specific movements and sequences they have to go by.
Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
They got they’re tactics for professionals on how to do a time travel war fight. I REALLY wished you people realize how well thought out and smart/clever this movie really is because Nolan did something reality special with it all as the tactics in this movie were incredibly smart and thought out extremely well.
No seriously for all people, Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
It’s massively rewarding when you figure it all out and see how the tactics and strategies used on this fight and movie are all fantastic well thought out and planned!
You “wonder” not with that nonsense sarcastic snarky reply, because it’s nonsense and foolish to say and utter out.
They got they’re tactics from PROFESSIONALS and using it all like professionals when you understand everything what’s going on. Please do. It’s rewarding when you figure it all out!
This is one of the most amazing special/practical effect movies I’ve ever seen. The opera scene, the car chase, the plane crash, inverted fight sequence . Amazing .
1:38 - What the hell was that (presumably inverted) enemy RPG guy experiencing? From their point of view, Red Team shoots at him AFTER his reversed rocket attack , so from his perspective, he started out dead/blown up, "reassembled," and then fired a rocket at the Red Team
So fucking confusing
No, that would be a paradox. One cannot “start out dead.” The film sets up two rules: mortal wounds travel in the direction of the target, and non-mortal wounds travel in the direction of the cause of the wound. In this case, the cause of the wound is Red Team’s non-inverted RPG, and the target is Sator’s inverted-mercenary.
Because, in forward-time, the inverted-mercenary unfired the inverted-RPG and then was subsequently hit with Red Team’s forward-RPG, that means that the inverted-mercenary must have survived Red Team’s RPG. The reason for this is because, following the Mortal Wound Law, if the inverted-mercenary did die from Red Team’s RPG, then from Red Team’s forward point of view, they would have ran up to the concrete wall, the inverted-mercenary would have been laying “lifeless” inside the building, and as Red Team fired their RPG at the building, the inverted-mercenary would have “sprung up to life” upon contact with the RPG and THEN proceeded to unfire an inverted-RPG from the concrete wall Red Team is at.
But, as we know, that is not how it played out in the movie. In the film, Red Team runs up to the concrete wall, the inverted-mercenary unfires an inverted-RPG from the wall, and then Red Team shoots a forward-RPG at the inverted-mercenary. Thus, the inverted-mercenary’s wound had to have been non-mortal. And, from the inverted-mercenary’s point of view, he fights in battle, and then suddenly several burns and cuts star to materialize into existence. As he moves closer and closer to the concrete building, his wounds and burns get worse and worse. When he reaches the top of the stairs, the damaged upper floor starts to “un-explode,” and suddenly the upper floor is restored and the inverted-blast “heals” the inverted-mercenary’s wounds and burns. The inverted-mercenary then notices a group of Red Team soldiers hovering behind a concrete wall, so he shoots an inverted-RPG at the wall. The Red Team soldiers then start to run backwards towards their landing zone.
@@RShadow12 amazing explanation
Non-inverted people can also use inverted weapons anyway.
@@RShadow12 Is that Mortal Wound Law thing actually established in the movie?? It's been a long time since I've seen it. At what point do they talk about it? Because if the guy would die, would he lay there dead, decomposing in reverse time forever?? Like years ago in forward time, people find a guy's rotting skeleton (well they would see it unrotting in forward time) in there laying but nobody messes with it? What happens if they mess with his dead body, remove it and dump it somewhere else? Isn't that a time paradox?
Also what's the "scientific" explanation behind "mortal wound law"? It sounds silly
1:48 fun fact: for the enemy guy (if he was inverted): they shoot first with their bazooka and after he saw that he shout with his own bazooka in response. For both teams quite the same situation - both shoot with bazooka in response
It's like they're not fighting but working together to make this battle function properly
1:09 judging by how awkward everyone looks while running, I'm guessing they filmed this with everybody running backwards then played it in reverse. you can even see someone from red team running backwards at the end of this shot.
Ah yes, a 30mm canon at point blank range... Misses every fkn shot on helicopters basically hovering in place
And a quad DSHK😂
russian arms lel
No they DONT “miss every shot on helicopters hovering in place” you fool! The bullets aren’t going to effect them THEN, but effect the helicopters and enemy in the PAST and Future! That’s how I know you don’t get the scene and what’s it’s trying to do when you make this making sarcastic comment like this. It’s hard to understand I know but it makes sense overall. You only say that because they are shooting people in the future and in the past who are present and NOT present. There are multiple events happening all at once happening in this scene. Everything is inverted and the things they do have to be very precise as the shooting they are doing doesn’t directly effect them unless it’s the future and past as MULTIPLE events are happening at once.
It’s not supposed to because it’s all quick movement and action as the tenet troops are shooting at the enemy in the future and in the past. It’s highly complex to grasp but it makes complete sense and it’s rewarding when you figure it all out!
Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
@@coleparker5179 no it’s not “Russian arms”, there’s a reason for everything in this scene, It’s hard to understand I know but it makes sense overall. You only say that because they are shooting people in the future and in the past who are present and NOT present. There are multiple events happening all at once happening in this scene.
It’s not supposed to because it’s all quick movement and action as the tenet troops are shooting at the enemy in the future and in the past. It’s highly complex to grasp but it makes complete sense and it’s rewarding when you figure it all out!
Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
You laughing and posting that stupid emoji only proves your ignorance as you prove more and more you don’t know what you’re talking about as this scene is very well thought out. It’s a time inversion war, no duh things are going to look off and surreal because what they’re shooting at doesn’t effect them in the present, only in the future and past so the shot on every helicopter in “point blank range” doesn’t “miss every shot” it’s meant for something else inverted in time. That should be extremely obvious given the context of the movie.
Like I said, Watch Welby Coffespill’s video on this scene for you to understand how well it’s done and explained properly.
You’re a complete fool for making this foolish stupid comment and not realizing sooner on how smart it really is on and how the purpose of each scene is supposed to be.
Stop laughing, your not helping any of your cases because your just not understanding what’s what.
From my understanding they were filming the scene at 1:15 by letting the red team actually move backwards? That's why the movements look strange and there is one guy actually running backwards at the left who didn't get the memo?
Yes, in several parts of the film this happens. It must win the Oscar because of little special effect
@@thalysnatanael Well some scenes look pretty well but there are some mistakes like the guy running backwards or the strange looking movements, so I am not sure.
Haha i noticed this too just now and kept replaying the scene if it was a red person. Someone enjoyed running backwards 😅
Tenet is so fucking bad
The shot is being played in reverse -- you can tell by the explosion in the background, which is happening in reverse. So yes, during filming of this scene, the red-team actors were moving in reverse, hence their awkwardness. Not a very smooth take... must have been too difficult a shot to keep re-doing.
all those troops bunched together in a fire fight lol, Nolan is losing him mind
Crazy tho the blue team already knows what's going to happen to the red team and the red team already sees the aftermath and knows what happens to the blue team even tho they arrived after the red....Jesus it hurts my head thinking about it...infact I don't even think that's right...it's so hard to comprehend.
Well I feel like Nolan did that on purpose to show that since this isn’t a normal gunfight new procedures have to be put into play. Remember when Ives or whatever said they’ll have reverse antagonists and forward antagonists all at the same time 🤷♀️ idk jus a thought
Who even are they shooting at?
Am I missing something? Like everyone I was confused by this movie but I'm baffled by the decision not to show the enemy's vantage point.
Did you not see the army in white uniforms?
Too much actions for less enemies.. I see white uniforms but it seems too few for an organizations that wanted to start world war 3
Honestly, I don't have issues with the opposing force not appearing much, since I've already watched Dunkirk(2017) .(To anyone who don't know the movie, a WW2 movie directed by the same guy who directed TENET where there barely visibly enemies
@@nungbear1398 Lmfao there's a gigantic difference between the movie Dunkirk, which very accurately depicted a real historical event, and this pure-fictional-fucking nonsense
@@CommanderLongJohn well it is fictional, what do you expect? What's more is that this type of movie is new and unconventional unlike normal movies, hence the confusion
That whole sequence must be really tough to shoot hats off to this incredible exciting work.
I see Nolan still has the same issues he has with directing a proper massive gunfight since the dark knight, seriously? did he still think that people run around with assault rifles like in call of duty?
Bruu but i kinda agree with you the movie itself is basically Modern Warfare 2019 rather than an original movie 😂
It would drag out the scene incredibly if it showed everyone killing each other. The main point was to follow the Protagonist.
How were they then supposed to go to the main area(the buildings) from the place the soldiers were dropped??? After reaching the buildings the soldiers did spread out.
They only have 10 minutes to save the world. You can’t expect them to move slowly and organized. And they are in the middle of a war where people move forward and backward, the environment is chaotic and that’s what Nolan wanted to show us. Just look at TP. He runs faster then everybody in his team because he only have one goal: to reach and save the algorithm.
@@kianrangassamy8461 I dont need to see that. I just need to see some of the background character take cover instead of running around like mad man
The blue team are the red one that happened in earlier days before. And the red team was actually going backward in days to stop the big bomb. That's why they tag themself red so that they can identify themselves. And the whole scene that was processing was actually in repeat that why we can see bombs blowing in backwards.
No? The red team are going forwards in time, the reason why there are explosions in reverse is because the enemies are in reverse
I really love this scene as it finally showed, in along time, a big battle sequence where both sides have relatively big groups.
1:08 how that smokes slowly going back to its cause, fucking amazing
This movie went over a lot of peoples heads.
A technical marvel with a simple messgse that time/destiny is inevitable for all of us❤.
Nolan is not Going to be happy until he makes the Film that confuses himself 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Even spectral did a better job by showing the enemy’s appearance :3
Gahahahahah
1:09 You maybe wondering why these soldiers here are running like this, just because they're running backwards in the original footage and the explosion behind it is real.
1:16 one of these soldiers was running towards the wrong direction.
just a glitch in the simulation
@BearBacca as you can see he is in same team which is red. he should be moving at same direction.
He a little confused, but he got the spirit.
They were filming backwards walking backwards, but the actor failed and ran forward. Hahahah
The only thing that bugs me with this scene is that for all of the explosions and shooting we see, we see very few enemy soldiers die. And it's especially weird when the red and blue teams just run past the enemies.
They’re fighting inverted and present time enemies.
This movie didn’t quite do it for me but I love how inventive the action sequences are
He still cant make a proper gunfight since the dark knight lol
I think we can't understand his gunfight scenes. Correct me, I think I am wrong.
@@aryabratsahoo7474 I think its more to do with the fact they look like the sunday teens airsoft crew rather than soldiers.
@@fb2551 Also you cant see who they're shooting at
Maybe, you are trying this in the wrong universe. This is not a video game fighting movie. I think you didn't pay any attention what Ives said. This thing is just an advantage of blue team.The war isn't very important. Because, what's happend is happened. You just only have to follow the protagonist till the very end. If you want a heavyweight fighty fighty action movie you can watch other blockbuster. Not a Nolan movie. And what did you say? Nolan can't do a proper gunfight? Then, Maybe you haven't really seen Inception and Dunkirk yet. I recommend you to watch the first and third level of dream. That's the proof what Nolan can do or not.
this is true. Nolans pretty good at almost everything else except for gun scenes. But ig its just as bad as directors that give unlimited ammo to the character and hes jumping around killing everyone without even getting hit once
The only movie i regret not seeing in theaters
The war against nobody
Waste of money
Who told nobody
The enemies are shown very little
The white dresssed men are the enemies
The enemies are those dressed in universal camo
Even suicide squad is better than this 😆
You guys have flatter brains then flat earthers lmao
Loved the scene but the only thing that bothered that not enough enemies to make them stop and take cover.
Im annoyed how they move in those massive groups, that could be taken out with one good explosion. Nolan was always terrible in making big scale fights like that. Eg. Police in Batman
People: *joins the army/marines to do this irl
Same people: great now I have to go sweep the same side walk again.
*This is just for memes I have nothing but respect for our servicemen and women*
No that’s pretty accurate
This movie is complicated that you cant stop watching to see where it leads
I love how at 1:09 everybody is running backwards but it's reverse, their gait is weird.
this entire sequence suffered terribly from not showing the enemy's point of view. i dont care about whats happening if they are just going to shoot at nothing. what's funny is that dunkirk accomplished this tremendously well, but it doesn't seem to work here. i think that's because we've already seen sator and his men throughout the movie, but now they are almost absent from the scene, whereas dunkirk committed to the invisible enemy for its whole run time.
I don't remember, who were the bad guys making war against before the Red and Blue team?
Sator's men.
The white-uniformed Russians.
i think Nolan is the only director that could succesfully tackle the time warping effects of a Dragon Break,
I was underwhelmed when I saw this. I was so excited to see a Nolan movie in theaters. But I ended up not hearing the dialogue or understanding anything. I also agree that in this scene, there is literally no opposing team shown anywhere.
Yea the dialogue volume was a huge deal. It’s such a confusing premise and to not hear them explaining it just makes you constantly say “what the fuck is going on?” lol
i found this scene underwhelming aswell. Looks more like a paintball match
Yup it took awhile to understand this scene cause I didn’t see any opposing forces, just forwards(red) and backwards(blue) version of the same team
Plus the reversed backwards running looks really janky.
You know what's pretty cool? Watching an explosion moving in reverse!
It's like it starts happening slowly, then it just stops and magically constructs something!
Am I the only one who thought this looks like a part of the "Knightmare" scene from BvS??
basically i feel like the reason they don't show much of the enemy is the fact that according to the timeline shenanigans, the blue team already relayed the important information about the battle... so red team is just following a script. I remember in the red team briefing scene right before the battle, one of the soldiers asks something like, "since we're having this briefing, doesn't that technically mean we already succeed the mission?" It's still very confusing to try and understand how it all functions.
I have never seen any military run around this bunched up and running in unorganized hordes
you have never seen a 10 minute operation against people in the future and the past either
Son: Mom can we have weird movies?
Mom: We have weird movies at home.
Weird movies at home:
Doesn’t make sense lol
The best kind of weird movie
Weird movies at home:
Mom: We have weird movies at home.
Son: Mom can we have weird movies?
This sequence is 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Teacher: the test is going to be easy
The test:
I wouldn't be surprised if Nolan didn't have a clue what was going on either
Imagine yourself going back in time to fix your own self in a scene / action you wanted to undo… this is what would happened
I like how they look like XOF soldiers
Metal gear solid
So that's where I had seem them before
Is there any way i can get the music from this scene? Its not in the oficial soundtracks. Thanks
th-cam.com/video/ygEwnEaFHEI/w-d-xo.html
Your’re welcome
This is how war zone should start out instead of dropping in for the initial start.
Ground War
No
- "So, ...Is it going forward or backward?"
- Yep.
looks like a paintball fight
Actors: So what are we shooting at?
Director: Nothing! Shoot at NOTHING!
We want a tenet video game.
We already have one, it’s called timeshift
No.
What’s time shift?
@@cheddarcheese9311 based on the above comment, a video game
@@Coyoteblack i thought the same thing. fucking loved that game
After watching this I had to watch a “tenet explained” video. Then after that I had to watch a “tenet explained explained” video. I haven’t found a “tenet explained explained explained” video but I’m going to keep looking.
Try looking for “video explained explained explained Tenet” maybe that could work
Chinook helicopters carrying sea cans.... full of troops. Thats like a school bus towing a cattle trailer full of people. Lol i must be missin something
my brain becomes
P O T A T O P
This Time travel plot....
Looks like a plot from an SCP
for all of ya that didnt understand tenet when ya first watched it... then give it another try... i saw the first 30 mins and didnt understand a single thing so i just turned it off... but then i watched it again now in March... and i guess i have become smarter or something... understood most of it... overall very good movie 9/10 for the confusion rly
Here ‘cause of Battlefield 2042
i know a lot of people hate this movie. but i love it. it's extremely creative. never seen anything like it. it is confusing though.
1:09 I was thinking: why are these running in a weird way? Then I realised they were filmed running backwards before the footage was reversed 😆
Watching this movie gave me flashbacks to my days trying to understand calculus. I flunked calculus.
i am a mathematical physicist and even still there are parts of this that are logically inconsistent
Full on sprinting while shooting, I doubt they were hitting anything in ANY dimension
Imagine Nolan takes over Marvel's timeline.
When you watch the extras in the back ground try to hustle. Is laziness why they’re basically jogging in place?
Imagine fighting in an enivronment where if you take cover in the wrong place, you will be sucked into a building
If you wondering WTF is going on welcome to the club mate.
I even read the entire wiki page for this shit.
Who else doesn’t understand thr movie but loves it ?
That is the power of Nolan. No one can understand him, just become fan of him.
"10 METERS MINIMUM, YOU FUCKING LEMONS!!!" - A Striped One
Ive never been this confused
マジで頭がこんがらがる
even writing a comment about tenet makes me feel like a scientist 🥼
24 months ago
Yea cause trained soldiers just run in a big wave like zombies 🙄😂
It feels like Nolan decided 'the way we're going to film this movie is by recording people doing stuff backwards, then reverse the video in post production' and then he retroactively invented some nonsense time travel rules in order to justify the filming technique. There's some really cool and radical ideas, like at 3:00 where this building only exists for a single second before it is destroyed both backwards and forwards in time, but when you try and actually think about the ramifications of something like that you either give up trying to rationalize it or accept that the concept is complete hogwash.
this seen was sureal This is why this is my favorite movie of all time
The plate carrier used by Neil, Ives and the Protagonist is the Condor Gunner.
yeah, no, I do not advise charging like you're someone from WWI, just one grenade is enough to send half of your team home in a box, just one well-placed machine gun is enough to cut your charging knights on an open field in half, but hey, ill let real veterans do the real talk, I'm just here for some shits and giggles
Was there a technical issue regarding why we don’t see Sator’s men? Were there just too many groups to indicate who was who in this scene?
Ok I have a question. Why didn't any of the Red team do anything with the chopper on 2:19 , aside from TP being curious
he wasn't armed
From the creators of *That movie you did not understand* and *That other movie you did not understand either but in Space* , comes...
movie you didn't understand but now it's bAcKwArDs
I really dont understand why these scifi movies think those ground support helmets used by air craft maintenance crew are good for combat.. xD They are legit thin sheet of plastic
@@MS-vi9ug no shit but am talking about the helmet xD they are two separate thing. Ive used that headgear when I was in the airforce and it is not meant for combat
in the movie it was explained that theres you cant breathe in reverse dimension, so they use that mask connected with small oxygen tank.
@@sunshineskystar That still does not justify the usage of the helmet that has no protection against bullets or shrapnels xD Think you are diverging from the main topic of this comment haha
@@reinheart14121412 It isn't plastic. It may look similar but military helmets use Kevlar. You can search up what Kevlar looks like yourself and what's its functions. Helmets also have limited bullet proof function as it only prevents stray bullets, fragments and small caliber pistols. These helmets use different material to airforce helmets.
@@Thauo91823 It is hardened plastic. That helmet is a flight deck helmet produced by David Clark. I've used it during my time in service. And yes I know how kevlar works. And no not all helmets are made of kevlar (but majority is). Helmets you probably are used to seeing on movies now days consists of Koroyd tubes. Although these tubes CAN be made of many different materials (kevlar included).
This movie you need a god tier of understanding or else your brain will be on airplane mode
Easily one of the most poorly-executed sequences in cinematic history. Nobody knows what’s happening, the “soldiers” don’t move tactically-instead they move in giant herds, they’re shooting at nothing, you barely see the enemy forces, it’s all a giant, incoherent cluster
@@TheSealOfDeath Doesn't matter if it's done backwards in time or with n groups simultaneously, what they do is dumb. They show several soldiers throw grenades and run at them, they land in helicopters right in front of AA machine gun emplacements, you can see people on all sides take cover from seemingly random directions.
I'm no expert, but paintball with friends during elementary was played more tactically than this.
if you actually watch the film, you would get it
@@Ooog__ I watched the film twice because I wanted to understand everything with the advantage of hindsight, this scene is dumb.
@@ThePppp89 is right the movie id quite confusing and cuts are abrupt,either release a long version, director's cut or keep getting criticized
Once you see the background people effortlessly job backwards to simulate the reversal of time, you can’t unsee it
How the hell did the anti air guys miss the flying coffins at point blank range?? Just takes me out of it.
because they are inverted
nolan like the reverse stuff so much that he put it in his movie.