Reign Of Terror: The Vicious Rule Of King Richard II | Britain's Bloodiest Dynasty | Timeline

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.8K

  • @TimelineChannel
    @TimelineChannel  4 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    Sign up to History Hit with code 'timeline' for 80% off bit.ly/TimelineSignUp

    • @metallicarchaea1820
      @metallicarchaea1820 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @EQ Games
      9 n9

    • @sheilahunter8807
      @sheilahunter8807 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’m a descendant of the Plantagenets They r

    • @SusanBucc
      @SusanBucc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      :

    • @NobleKorhedron
      @NobleKorhedron 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Is it true the Plantagenets inspired Game of Thrones...?

    • @jenmb2679
      @jenmb2679 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@metallicarchaea1820 ?

  • @Jackaljkljkl
    @Jackaljkljkl ปีที่แล้ว +121

    The Richard II actor is really, really good.
    His smile when he welcomes Bolingbroke back with "cousin!" is pure malice.

    • @PatrickTower-ln7oi
      @PatrickTower-ln7oi 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But Henry wasn’t scared of Richard

  • @loganbagley7822
    @loganbagley7822 3 ปีที่แล้ว +336

    Fun fact: When Dan Jones mentions that Henry has been on crusade, he is not talking about the crusades in the Holy Land, which by this time were over. He is referring to the Northern Crusades in which the Teutonic knights fought the pagan Lithuanians. Henry fought alongside the Teutonic knights in these campaigns, particularly the Siege of Vilnius.

    • @2serveand2protect
      @2serveand2protect ปีที่แล้ว +40

      Lithuania was already a Christian country by that time - however the Teutons took their supposed "paganity" as an excuse to plunder the local population and expand their wealth & territories. Most of the Granduchy's lands were Greek-Orthodox, while only the Lithuanian "heartlands" remained pagan, but by that time, they already got baptized, with ONE exception - Samogitia - and Samogitia was strategically important for the Teutons. Samogitia would get baptized later on - by 1413 - and not BY THE SWORD which was the usual "teutonic" way of doing things (SLAUGHTERING the local population and taking over their lands, while inviting pesant farmers usually from the Germanic lands & cities, i.e. GERMANIZATION of the locals) but "BY THE BOOK" - i.e. through baptism and evangelisation of the country.

    • @dirkvanerp7332
      @dirkvanerp7332 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Who'd have thought?
      I always thought a Tuetonic Night was part of the sleep number bed?

    • @Frater_Maven
      @Frater_Maven ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@dirkvanerp7332LOLOLOL am I the only one who actually gets this joke?

    • @Fires755
      @Fires755 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for that!

    • @johngilmore697
      @johngilmore697 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Silence

  • @Picard578
    @Picard578 5 ปีที่แล้ว +243

    "Astonishingly... peace breaks out". Quite good description of the period.

  • @devonspirithealer8854
    @devonspirithealer8854 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1305

    Conclusion of the series: if you’re a Plantagenet king, don’t have a best friend.

    • @reznovnata3889
      @reznovnata3889 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      I was thinking the same thing as well.

    • @racheljennings8548
      @racheljennings8548 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Never a good idea

    • @Knight860
      @Knight860 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Very true and don't be focused on only what you want if you expect to have an uncontested reign.

    • @auto_math
      @auto_math 5 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      and be nice to your cousins.

    • @camplethargic8
      @camplethargic8 5 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      The king has no friends - only followers, and foe. - Falstaff

  • @nubiankhaleesi2945
    @nubiankhaleesi2945 6 ปีที่แล้ว +484

    This was an awesome series!! This is why I love history-- but one thing is for sure, IM SO GLAD I WAS NOT BORN BACK THEN!!!! Jeez what a crazy time.... and this narrator guy is awesome!

    • @adamnomdeplum3
      @adamnomdeplum3 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Nubian Khaleesi though the fashion looked comfortable

    • @LoneKharnivore
      @LoneKharnivore 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@adamnomdeplum3 Except for the lice, fleas and bedbugs.

    • @dougmphilly
      @dougmphilly 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Nubian Khaleesi Dan Jones is one of the presenters of history out there.

    • @jerad248
      @jerad248 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Me too.... I’m like thank you Jesus cause you know it wouldn’t have gone down well for me in 1360.

    • @bruggeman672
      @bruggeman672 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      How is today any less insane?

  • @adipuppi
    @adipuppi 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1107

    i love how the actors take turns doing different roles within the series

    • @teutons87
      @teutons87 7 ปีที่แล้ว +269

      and yet better made than those high budget American made documentaries...

    • @MrEsDz
      @MrEsDz 7 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      its called reincarnation..true story

    • @brettkeeling8811
      @brettkeeling8811 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      hi panjit ji can you help me with a spell please i dont have whataap

    • @justiniand6a788
      @justiniand6a788 6 ปีที่แล้ว +104

      Like how Henry II is now a bishop at 2:35

    • @stud20084977
      @stud20084977 6 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      The same actress plays Margaret Beaufort in Britains Bloody Crown and Eleanor of Aquitaine in Britains Bloodiest Dynassty

  • @Sean12248
    @Sean12248 4 ปีที่แล้ว +153

    If anyone has just watched this series let me tell you: The Plantangents by Dan Jones is awesome and worth a read, it covers them all, not just the Kings here.

    • @nuckelaveez5029
      @nuckelaveez5029 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Probably the quickest I've ever read a book, so good.

    • @Sean12248
      @Sean12248 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@nuckelaveez5029 Marc Morris is also very good. His book called The Norman Conquest is very well written and has some dark humor in it. Edward III by Ian Mortimer is also good.

  • @rogerrogers3951
    @rogerrogers3951 5 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    Man this guy was a really great narrator. Probably the best I've heard in years. You can tell he loves this stuff. Love to play some crusader kings II with him.

  • @ladysiam3024
    @ladysiam3024 3 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    I love English history. It has everything. Evil kings, cruelty, bloodlust and non-stop action. Better than any Hollywood movie.

    • @AshleyMartin-f3x
      @AshleyMartin-f3x ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Agreed

    • @JaynaeMarieXIV
      @JaynaeMarieXIV ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You haven't heard of the Borgias, Medicis, or the Bourbons?

    • @terrycanales23
      @terrycanales23 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JaynaeMarieXIV this video wasn't about the families you mentioned. Because she didn't refer to them does not mean she hasn't heard of them!

    • @McCRBen
      @McCRBen ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Try being their neighbours in Ireland.
      Dealing with psychopaths in power lead to the troubles in Ireland.

    • @fengwang8658
      @fengwang8658 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Freedom !!!

  • @ethicaltoby7807
    @ethicaltoby7807 7 ปีที่แล้ว +449

    This historical series was great! Please produce more medieval documentaries if possible.

    • @threestepssideways1202
      @threestepssideways1202 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      You do realise this is a BBC production ? This channel (thankfully) is just mirroring.

    • @masada2828
      @masada2828 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Ethical Toby - what a great way to teach the young their history.

    • @romella_karmey
      @romella_karmey 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      We want War of the Roses docu.

    • @theotterguy
      @theotterguy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This same presenter has The Bloody Crown (War of the Roses)th-cam.com/video/SB_OThWd-eA/w-d-xo.html

    • @joannehussey7420
      @joannehussey7420 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Channel 5 in the UK not BBC.
      Channel 5 is doing some great history programmes, definitely giving the BBC a run for their money. Taking more chances too.

  • @buckeyeinblack
    @buckeyeinblack 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1220

    When you expect a Tommen, but got a Joffery.

    • @nguyenthanhhai6725
      @nguyenthanhhai6725 5 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      good joke right there

    • @happyhammer1
      @happyhammer1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +88

      Pretty sure Joffrey is based on him.

    • @estring123
      @estring123 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@happyhammer1 whos tywin then? and whos littlefinger?

    • @happyhammer1
      @happyhammer1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@estring123 your kidding right?

    • @meyaknoekong5167
      @meyaknoekong5167 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol. Good use of opportunity 👍🏾

  • @JuliahistoryLover
    @JuliahistoryLover 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    I wish Dan Jones would do shows on every medieval character in super micro detail. Love all his shows

  • @valosfarsangi6048
    @valosfarsangi6048 7 ปีที่แล้ว +166

    So Glad I found this channel. Some of the best documentaries I've seen in a LONG time.

  • @scarczar2545
    @scarczar2545 5 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    This series is riveting and educational.
    Each program moved along they neither bogged down nor slowed to a snail’s pace that would have caused the viewer to lose interest.
    Dan Jones is superb in his presentation.

  • @neeters5
    @neeters5 7 ปีที่แล้ว +826

    And some say history is boring...

    • @tamlynn786
      @tamlynn786 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      RonApP SF Timeline makes it interesting

    • @bladegod1160
      @bladegod1160 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Its cuz of exam and boring history we have to study.

    • @mitjed
      @mitjed 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      It's boring when researching it all by yourself.

    • @chrissams6230
      @chrissams6230 6 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      Jed not really you gotta have imagination when you read...

    • @AlianorBeaufort
      @AlianorBeaufort 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Only those who dont know it

  • @Isildun9
    @Isildun9 6 ปีที่แล้ว +307

    And thus, the throne passed from the Primary Line of the Plantagenet family, to the cadet branch of the House of Lancaster, setting the stage for more dynastic struggle. Oh goody.

    • @l.plantagenet
      @l.plantagenet 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@achmadaqsahusain5046 *Wars of the Roses*😊

    • @ellistonsmith8475
      @ellistonsmith8475 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      hiddon
      knowlege

    • @pop5678eye
      @pop5678eye 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Yes, the next great struggle between the houses of Lannister and Stark... Sorry, I meant the real historical houses of Lancaster and York. (even GOT writers admit it was based on them)

    • @rksingh2628
      @rksingh2628 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@pop5678eye Namewise only. If we compare historically, Lancasters are Targaryens and Baratheons are yorks.
      Robert Baratheon is like Edward IV, Stannis is like Richard III.

    • @richardlahan7068
      @richardlahan7068 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      But they are still Plantagenets!

  • @brohan914
    @brohan914 6 ปีที่แล้ว +158

    For anyone interested I'd recommend Dan Jones' books wholeheartedly. Both Wars of the Roses and The Plantagenets are cracking good reads.

    • @happyhammer1
      @happyhammer1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      His book about The Templars is pretty good as well.

    • @pinkcrazygirl
      @pinkcrazygirl 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I just purchased 3 of his books and can't wait to read them.

    • @MaryHaleyKelly
      @MaryHaleyKelly 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think I'll ask for them as a Christmas present

    • @smarttgirl
      @smarttgirl 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree! Two of my favs.

    • @michellemuir2249
      @michellemuir2249 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I just finished his Plantagenet book and am starting his Wars of the Roses book! They are absolutely amazing!!

  • @cejka30
    @cejka30 6 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    I’m addicted to these documentaries!

    • @smarti1144
      @smarti1144 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I've watched for in a row. I swear I'm stopping at five.... For the night

  • @bursegsardaukar
    @bursegsardaukar 6 ปีที่แล้ว +119

    17:13 reminds me of Tyrion telling Joffrey "The Mad King did as he likes. Did your uncle Jamie tell you what happen to him? Talk about educating your nephew.

    • @AmateurSurgeonThe3rd
      @AmateurSurgeonThe3rd 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Except in this version Joffrey kills Tyrion

    • @craigjolicoeur3012
      @craigjolicoeur3012 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You mean father/uncle lol

    • @pepsibente489
      @pepsibente489 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes, just like George R. R. Martin had taken it directly from this!

  • @martheresa7550
    @martheresa7550 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Tywin Lannister: “Do you really think a crown can give you power?”
    Tyrion Lannister: “No, I think armies give you power.”

  • @1987MartinT
    @1987MartinT 6 ปีที่แล้ว +181

    It's kinda amusing to watch Richard II threaten Henry Bolingbroke only to be confused by the fact that Henry isn't afraid of him anymore.

    • @Chrisiamtheluciddream
      @Chrisiamtheluciddream 6 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Henry was a battle hardened warrior. I would not be surprised if he truly wasn't afraid of his cousin in any way.

    • @snakes3425
      @snakes3425 6 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      Henry: You forget cousin, I know you. I know what you really are. I fought in your war in France, I fought on Crusades, I've won tournaments. I've become a man, you never stopped being the fourteen year old boy who was told he was God's gift to the world. You think for five minutes I was ever afraid of you. I only spared you last time because of our past, but not this time. There's a new sheriff in town Richard...get this filth out of my sight

    • @robloxxd5367
      @robloxxd5367 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      thats Disrespectful , Call him King Henry IV please

    • @jonathancampbell5231
      @jonathancampbell5231 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Ronnie Colbert: "I hate the French because they beat us in 1066."
      Stephen Fry: "I hate the French because they beat us in 1998."
      Ronnie Barker: "I just hate the French; I don't need a reason."

    • @jonathancampbell5231
      @jonathancampbell5231 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @benvolio mozart It's a joke from a British comedy sketch made in the year 2000.
      The first guy is playing a peasant from the 11th century.
      The second guy is playing "modern man" and he means when the French beat the English at the World Cup.
      The third is playing "Renaissance Man" and he's just showing that the English will hate the French no matter what the excuse is.
      th-cam.com/video/0JSahEDRjvw/w-d-xo.html&frags=pl%2Cwn

  • @DMRoper1
    @DMRoper1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +442

    "He cries out in English...." Finally.

    • @pop5678eye
      @pop5678eye 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah, as if that resulted in peace... Watch the next series on the rest of dynasty... and the next after that...

    • @freedomforall1712
      @freedomforall1712 5 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Hahaha I was saying the same thing. I honestly did not know they spoke French as a primary language among nobles all the way up to the 1400's. In England....

    • @LoneKharnivore
      @LoneKharnivore 5 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      @@freedomforall1712 It's why meat on the hoof and meat on the plate have different names - 'sheep' was English, 'mutton' was French; 'cow' was English, 'beef' was French. The peasants raised them and the nobles ate them.

    • @freedomforall1712
      @freedomforall1712 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@LoneKharnivore good point, thank you for the info!

    • @rlucas96
      @rlucas96 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@LoneKharnivore thanks!

  • @emperorofpluto
    @emperorofpluto ปีที่แล้ว +15

    This is how history should be taught. The re-enactments were brilliant, especially the French dialogue .

  • @CreatingwithG
    @CreatingwithG 4 ปีที่แล้ว +92

    The men who stood against the king!! They were really brave. Richard’s personality was really terrifying 😐

    • @crhu319
      @crhu319 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We need a statue of Wat Tyler beheading a bishop and one of Richard II starving to death.

    • @oggioggi7915
      @oggioggi7915 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      1​@@crhu319 You need a RA.

    • @ronaldmessina4229
      @ronaldmessina4229 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Creating with G. I do certainly agree with u ,and I would be most terrified to have lived there when the bloody battles occurred, because I am a horrible chicken 🐔, and I would have never been able to fight in those horrible battles in ingland 😢

  • @carolmorris404
    @carolmorris404 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    What I love the most of the Plantagenates is... Dan Jones narration of them.

  • @alansmith6376
    @alansmith6376 5 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men..."
    -John Dalberg-Acton

    • @pedroalitovar6624
      @pedroalitovar6624 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don't think so, but nice phrase

    • @lauren-he4fr
      @lauren-he4fr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      power reveals.

    • @lordscrewtape2897
      @lordscrewtape2897 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Compare to the" Father of My country" George Washington... He voluntarily gave up power not once but twice, once as Commander in chief of the army , and then as president... He even verbally slapped down a guy who recommended he be called your excellency... He preferred the simple Mr president... Which all presidents have been called ever since...

  • @Knight860
    @Knight860 7 ปีที่แล้ว +211

    If George RR Martin did model Joffery Baratheon in part on Richard II it was a brilliant decision, I see a lot of Richard in Joffery.

    • @thearmada6248
      @thearmada6248 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Marcus Drake I also see Edward of Westminster in him. His father was King Henry the sixth and during Edwards life his father was stuck in the English civil war known as the Wars of the Roses. Edward had ordered two knights heads be cut off and his mother Margret of Anjou reminds me of Cersei Lannister.

    • @miss_mars931
      @miss_mars931 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly what I said!

    • @snakes3425
      @snakes3425 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I wonder if House Baratheon as a whole wasn't modeled on Richard's private army mostly due to their symbol

    • @snakes3425
      @snakes3425 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I also see aspect of the Mad King Aerys II Targaryan in Richard as well

    • @adesugbadapo
      @adesugbadapo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      apparently Richard III was Tyrion lannister...

  • @Liutgard
    @Liutgard 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Just to note, when Arundel showed up late at Anne's funeral, he not only didn't apologize, he told the king that he had to leave early because he had something 'important' (implying _more_ important) to attend to. Arundel had been a constant irritation for some time, but this insult was too much. He richly deserved the decking he got.

    • @michaelnoble1715
      @michaelnoble1715 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      HELLO LAURA HOPE YOU OKAY?

    • @Liutgard
      @Liutgard 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaelnoble1715 Uh, yeah, I'm ok. Why- do I know you?

    • @michaelnoble1715
      @michaelnoble1715 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Liutgard guess no i was just going through this post and i saw your profile and i decided to say HI i am from Germany but i live in Vermont Montpelier where are you from?

    • @jhjn1498
      @jhjn1498 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would do the same as richard ii

  • @1425363878
    @1425363878 6 ปีที่แล้ว +181

    Why is it ALWAYS more or less the same scheme? King got a friend who's seriously good at killing people. King makes new friend. Old friend becomes problem for the king.

    • @redadmiralofvalyria867
      @redadmiralofvalyria867 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Must have been how the things were in those days I guess smh

    • @IamCec
      @IamCec 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      True with emperors too 😆

    • @kweejibodali7009
      @kweejibodali7009 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      some friends were kingmakers who had serious power issues too, wanna be king too but not ready to own it... some even have a distant claim to throne like richard neville earl of warwick, kingmaker and support to henry vi and edward iv and even supported george of clarence, younger brother to edward iv against him , Richard changed sides and flip flopped so many times

    • @Walker733
      @Walker733 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because no one likes their position being threatened

  • @OrchestrationOnline
    @OrchestrationOnline 5 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    "Anyone with a drop of royal blood..." Bolingbroke had the exact same level of royal blood as Richard II. They were both sons of sons of Edward III. It wasn't a distantly related upstart who usurped the throne. The precedent Bolingbroke started was that closely-related cousins, patrilineally descended from Edward III, could vie for the throne. When the Yorkists threw out the Lancastrians, they were also direct patrilineal (and matrilineal) descendants of Edward III.

    • @WilliamRobinson-bb6mr
      @WilliamRobinson-bb6mr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Bolingbroke wasn't the heir apparent. He was the son of the 3rd son of Edward III. There was a young boy who was the grandson of Edward III's 2nd son who was the true heir.

    • @GRIMSBONIAN13
      @GRIMSBONIAN13 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Bolingbroke was the Son of John of Gaunt.

    • @OrchestrationOnline
      @OrchestrationOnline 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@GRIMSBONIAN13 Yeah I know. And John of Gaunt was the son of Edward III. "They were both sons of sons of Edward III" is what I said, right? Richard II was the son of Edward the Black Prince, and the Black Prince was the brother of John of Gaunt.

    • @OrchestrationOnline
      @OrchestrationOnline 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Never said that Bolingbroke was or wasn't the heir apparent. I'm merely pointing out that Bolingbroke had exactly the same degree of royal descent, birth order aside, that Richard II did. This video's dodgy script gives the impression that Bolingbroke came out of nowhere and barely had any claim. That's just not so. Bolingbroke had zero legitimate claim - but in terms of royal descent, he was at least qualified to be in the running for throneship.

    • @therealallpro
      @therealallpro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The point is he broke the rules of succession. Doesn’t matter if he was the grandson of Edward the 3rd. This actions lead to further bending of rules with Henry Tudor. This is the point Dan is making “with a drop of royal blood”

  • @dorrisgonnawreckyou7111
    @dorrisgonnawreckyou7111 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    As a grown man i now love history, but i think school ruined my own history for me (english history) all i remember is tudors and the war of the roses etc. and in very little detail. Even now i love history it has taken me years to even give english history a chance, which i did with this doc. Its done so bloody well its got me into it now, so thanks timeline, you are awesome.

  • @TheEzlau
    @TheEzlau 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    These 4 documentarys were the greatest, I learned so much about the history of England....I hope they make more like this with the same host!

  • @miaow8670
    @miaow8670 5 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    I am Czech, just as Richard II's wife Anne of Bohemia (Anna Česká) was. I do not know why, but it is indeed intriguing to realise that there once lived a woman of my nationality who became Queen of England.

    • @kingrichardiii6280
      @kingrichardiii6280 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      today we trade pokemon and yugioh cards, back in the day, at least with royals, they traded princesses.

    • @user-dl1xz3mj3i
      @user-dl1xz3mj3i 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But she wasnt a Czech..she was a German who just born there ! Dont be confused . She was a daughter of Karl lV

    • @kristynakostelecka8311
      @kristynakostelecka8311 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@user-dl1xz3mj3i you are wrong. She had czech ancestors as well.

    • @plamenivanov92
      @plamenivanov92 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The marriage between Anne of Bohemia and Richard II was arranged by Michael la Pole 1st Earl of Suffolk one of Richard II's favorites

    • @kamion53
      @kamion53 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kristynakostelecka8311 Anne's greatgreatfather was Wencelaus II of the Czech Přemyslid dynasty, after his death the kingdom of Bohemia, the richest kingdom in the Holy Roman Empire befell to House Luxemburg. due to marriage of his daughter Elisabeth to John the Blind of Luxembourg.
      Although coming from a very wealthy family Anne brought no dowry. Instead of that Richard payed 4 million pound in modern money to her brother.

  • @acertainredpanda1115
    @acertainredpanda1115 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is my favorite medieval documentary series. It's sooooo good. I love the storytelling, the actors are really good and the music really fits. I really like the little details Dan tells us. Really brings you into the mindset of these people!

  • @cx1productions670
    @cx1productions670 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great stuff! I am so glad that the TH-cam algorithm put this channel into my feed. Thank you for keeping history alive!

  • @musanap
    @musanap 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks!

  • @Amadeus8484
    @Amadeus8484 6 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Richard II: "We will punish the old guard for treason."
    "My lord. Is that legal?"
    Richard II: "I will make it legal."

    • @paulclarke9693
      @paulclarke9693 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Richard the Nixon: "It's not a crime if the President does it."

    • @kensebego199
      @kensebego199 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Spoken like a true tyrant

    • @jasonyu6649
      @jasonyu6649 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The conversation should end this way:
      Richard II: is it treason for not obeying the king?

  • @kenlamtsz
    @kenlamtsz 7 ปีที่แล้ว +146

    Richard II : U Wat m8?
    Rebel leader: Aye aye sire.

    • @ski8615
      @ski8615 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Katy Bee 🤣🤣🤣

  • @shantanukhandkar
    @shantanukhandkar 6 ปีที่แล้ว +217

    I had no idea that Henry II ended up becoming Archbishop. ;)

    • @annajowett5464
      @annajowett5464 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      I also had no idea that the Earl of Somerset had previously been the Duke of Gloucester.... (see the Bloody Crown....its brilliant)

    • @KnightWicked
      @KnightWicked 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I didn’t know John becomes William de valence. Ep 1&2

    • @horstschlemmer2042
      @horstschlemmer2042 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Shantanu Khandkar yes because of better air quality they lived for hundred of years back then.

    • @janel342
      @janel342 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Erm.... ??? Henry 11 made Becket his close friend The Archbishop of Canterbury. Got it?

    • @lawfrey3859
      @lawfrey3859 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@janel342 The joke is that it's the same actor for both roles. The actor who played Henry II is the Archbishop here.

  • @berja3895
    @berja3895 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I've really enjoyed watching this 4 part series. Very ell done, settings, the gorgeous castles, even the narrator is engaging. Thank you Timeline WHD!

  • @VickieV1333
    @VickieV1333 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I can not say how much I enjoyed this series and am craving MORE!!

  • @rahulvinalnarayan9743
    @rahulvinalnarayan9743 5 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Moral of the story: if you’re a king in these times, don’t have a best friend and don’t trust your wife and kids

  • @JaynaeMarieXIV
    @JaynaeMarieXIV ปีที่แล้ว +7

    One of my favorite dynasties. Right up there with the Habsburgs, Tudors, Stuarts, Bourbons, Medicis, and Borgias. Love these documentaries, by the way. Excellent.

    • @reneehall7655
      @reneehall7655 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You name all the good families😊. They was something else when it came to keeping and holding their things

  • @nuckelaveez5029
    @nuckelaveez5029 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dan Jones is now one of my favorite Authors. A master of history and historical story-telling

  • @Sunwell03
    @Sunwell03 6 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    Damn, is this game of thrones that I am watching? The whole series is just full of savagery.

    • @thegreenjackal
      @thegreenjackal 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      middle ages was a savage time and for the most part this was it with a lid on it since religion meant there were certain ways of doing things and the law of the land helped but take all that away and it would be this over and over again

    • @1223hammerhead
      @1223hammerhead 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Actually yes this is game of thrones, Martin drew a lot of inspiration from Medieval English and French monarchies

    • @ciscokid3506
      @ciscokid3506 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      GOT is loosely based on The War Of The Roses. It's a small part of this series. The same channel has a documentary on that period that's as good as this one.

    • @Chrisiamtheluciddream
      @Chrisiamtheluciddream 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Martin took a lot of inspiration from this period. Notice Richards emblem, look familiar?

    • @TheAurelianProject
      @TheAurelianProject 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thegreenjackal
      No, the Middle Ages were not a “savage time.” That has been thoroughly debunked by now. It is no more violent than any other century other than the Pax Americana and Pax Britannica.

  • @alixday4346
    @alixday4346 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I loved this documentary! I don't know enough about our history and get mixed up with who ruled when. Will keep watching these! Excellent presenter/narrator

  • @tinapeters5725
    @tinapeters5725 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Sir, may we more please, Thank you for this series,Dan Jones' narration is so easy on the ear. I love HISTORY, why do people say it is boring?

  • @PraetorianHiJynx
    @PraetorianHiJynx 6 ปีที่แล้ว +127

    Why did this series skip most of the good kings of the dynasty? I mean it's fun watching a documentary on the terrible ones, but my favorite episode of the series is the first one, which focused on one of the best English monarchs, Henry II.

    • @incrediblelurk2276
      @incrediblelurk2276 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Check the documentary title...

    • @ayakotami8630
      @ayakotami8630 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      The first episode does focus on Henry II.:)

    • @smarttgirl
      @smarttgirl 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I wondered why they didn't include Richard I, John (especially considering John was the reason Magna Carta came about) , Edward I, Edward III.

    • @kensebego199
      @kensebego199 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Well Richard I was hardly in England during his ten year reign but the most probable reason is Richard I, John, Edward longshanks, Edward III are covered so extensively in the media that they don't need to be covered here.

    • @coolfer2
      @coolfer2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Title is Britain's bloodiest dynasty. So it's kinda expected that they skip the un-"bloodiest" dynasts.

  • @rhbramley687
    @rhbramley687 7 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    This is a really good series. I've enjoyed every bit of it.

  • @hippolyte90
    @hippolyte90 7 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    After reading Shakespeare's histories, it's so interesting to see these documentaries and find out what was true and what wasn't.

    • @GRIMSBONIAN13
      @GRIMSBONIAN13 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Old William was not actually accurate though.

  • @kiratheusagiisworkshop5266
    @kiratheusagiisworkshop5266 6 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Daaaaang, this turned into Game of Thrones pretty fast.

    • @pop5678eye
      @pop5678eye 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      You do realize that the GOT writers admitted they based much of their series on this history, right?

    • @lordscrewtape2897
      @lordscrewtape2897 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Where do you think Martin got the idea...🤷‍♀️

    • @barbarat5729
      @barbarat5729 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No. It didn't. This was reality long before GOT was ever made up and FILMED. It was make-believe. It may have been loosely based on some of this history, but it was fantasy. They were ACTORS. They were PRETENDING. Can you tell I'm sick of GOT references?

    • @kiratheusagiisworkshop5266
      @kiratheusagiisworkshop5266 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@barbarat5729 It's a figure of speech, not literal. So calm down.

    • @TheAurelianProject
      @TheAurelianProject 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A lot of Game of Thrones is a based on real medieval history, except real medieval history is infinitely more complex and interesting tbh. The throne in GoT technically never even leaves the same family in the entire series, while in real life, the throne of England changed hands between at least 4 families (cadet branches) in the 14th and 15th centuries.

  • @Natasha-ew6qu
    @Natasha-ew6qu ปีที่แล้ว +14

    That scene with Anne's funeral always gets me. She was a sweet girl and was a good influence, but maybe her death was a mercy, she never had to watch her husband become a tyrant...

  • @WilliamRobinson-bb6mr
    @WilliamRobinson-bb6mr 5 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    In history rock paper scissors, Henry always beats Richard.

    • @Amadeus8484
      @Amadeus8484 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Richard beats John. John beats Henry?

    • @mijanhoque1740
      @mijanhoque1740 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Edward beats Henry, Henry beats Richard, Richard beats...

    • @MrAndersonneo88
      @MrAndersonneo88 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@mijanhoque1740 the peasants

    • @i.b.640
      @i.b.640 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Since John had a son named Henry ... very likely.

  • @alex_wolf
    @alex_wolf 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I love how they used some of the same actors and tried to disguise them as different characters. For examples: in this episode the priest praying behind Richard is Henry I from the first part. Isabella`s brother in the 3rd part is also a french noble in an earlier part. And King John in the first part is shown as Henry III`s Lusignan whisperer. An amazing documentary overall and very very well narated. Bravo!

    • @jhjn1498
      @jhjn1498 ปีที่แล้ว

      Richard ii here is also the duke of buckingham in richard iii video

    • @Jackaljkljkl
      @Jackaljkljkl ปีที่แล้ว

      I think you mean Henry II, but yea its the same guy.
      He is also in the Wars of the Roses series as Earl Rivers

  • @catraoinekelly2879
    @catraoinekelly2879 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The last part of this series and I have to say it was a bloody good watch! Thanks for the upload :)

  • @splitraven7060
    @splitraven7060 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I love learning history with Dan Jones serving as the presenter. :)

  • @stibo12
    @stibo12 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    A very good series! Thank you. Truly incredible history.

  • @kensebego199
    @kensebego199 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    From what I read, Henry V had Richard II properly buried as a way to correct his father's act of usurping the crown and I hear he was quite close to Richard too

  • @rachaelwilliams6999
    @rachaelwilliams6999 7 ปีที่แล้ว +348

    PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE DO THE WAR OF THE ROSES!!

    • @luqmanilyas2005
      @luqmanilyas2005 7 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      Rachael Williams they already have britans bloody crown

    • @johnlewis9158
      @johnlewis9158 7 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Rachael Williams the war of the roses was a part of the Plantagenet history. Richard the third who was killed at Bosworth field was the last of the Plantagenet monarchs

    • @KramYEET
      @KramYEET 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Little Maple Man this reply was a massive miscalculation

    • @alanrichards4228
      @alanrichards4228 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Rachael Williams Its Wars of the Roses.

    • @PetroniusArbiter2
      @PetroniusArbiter2 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      john lewis -- Like it or not, Richard II is usually considered as the last of the Plantagenet kings. Considering that the Lancastrians and Yorks were such a sharp break from the previous monarchs, especially from the genealogical standpoint, it makes sense.

  • @margheritatimeus3400
    @margheritatimeus3400 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This series of documentaries is fantastic, accurate, well told by professor Jones snd the staged scenes in costume are excellent, very well acted by well chosen actors ❤

  • @leslieshand4509
    @leslieshand4509 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    My paternal grandmother was born in England (a combat nurse during WW1). I am finding this series absolutely fascinating
    .THANKS!

    • @michaelnoble1715
      @michaelnoble1715 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      HELLO LESLIE HOPE YOU ARE OKAY?

    • @irishgrl
      @irishgrl 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@michaelnoble1715
      You are a troll 🧌

  • @samjoseph420
    @samjoseph420 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wiw what a fantastic series! I was hooked. Thank you so much for these uploads.

  • @simonjones7396
    @simonjones7396 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This Series was amazing, thanks a lot.

  • @tlcdnb13
    @tlcdnb13 7 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    love all the of the documentaries❤❤❤

    • @cammedred8624
      @cammedred8624 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Tara Barrameda yea as an American I find the history very cool

  • @rsangala
    @rsangala 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Great series, Dan Jones is also a great story teller

  • @novoeduardoac1248
    @novoeduardoac1248 7 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    GRRM must have been inspired by this king when he created Joffrey

    • @idontgiveafaboutyou
      @idontgiveafaboutyou 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No, Joffrey was worse. At least Richard had a soft spot at times.

    • @Blueleaf11
      @Blueleaf11 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      There's no shortage of tyrannical rulers throughout history, Joffrey is probably a mix of several of them.

    • @thearmada6248
      @thearmada6248 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Also Edward of Westminster. He order two knights heads be cut off and was probably illegitimate.

    • @Brandonhayhew
      @Brandonhayhew 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@thearmada6248 edward of Westminister was a basis for Joffery and King Richard the best, they all have a very interesting storyline.

    • @blazednlovinit
      @blazednlovinit 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@idontgiveafaboutyou At least Joffrey didn't expect people to throw themselves on the floor when his eyes landed on them.

  • @gayeroyal8870
    @gayeroyal8870 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I thought that I really knew this history. HOLY MOLY! The details from minute mark 42:00 until the end are chilling. I now fully understand how the "Split" of the Plantagenet Dynasty occurred. I'm pretty sure that I am a descendant of these people through the Lancastrian side. I will always be fascinated these people and their lives.

    • @newoneinblack
      @newoneinblack 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know how you feel. The Earl of Arundel mentioned here was my blood relative.

  • @marksman314
    @marksman314 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Claiming the throne in English = Crowning Moment of Awesome. Literally.

  • @scottnyc6572
    @scottnyc6572 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I thought this version explained in more detail how events transpired over the later videos done.The way it’s choreographed with a French to English translation really depicts how it must’ve been.

  • @MRGRIMZ89
    @MRGRIMZ89 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    “Evil cannot create anything new, they can only corrupt” - J.R.R. Tolkien

  • @tzvikrasner6073
    @tzvikrasner6073 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    From the rise of Henry II to the end of the Wars of the Roses, the Plantagenet line had 17 separate coronoations, though two of those- Henry VI and Edward IV- were crowned twice. 17 (or 15) kings in 300 years means a new ruler roughly every 20 years.

    • @Jackaljkljkl
      @Jackaljkljkl ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I feel the line ended with Richard II.
      While Bolingbroke had the Plantagenet blood, he was still Gaunt's (and not the Black Prince's) son and therefore a new line has started.
      Even Henry ViiI has Plantagenet blood going back to three of Edward II's sons (Lionel of Antwerp, John of Gaunt and Edmund of Langley), so a line has to be drawn somewhere.

  • @hamzak2181
    @hamzak2181 6 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    The actor playing Richard is what Ramsay Bolton is probably supposed to look like.

  • @jennifermoriarty2188
    @jennifermoriarty2188 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Love the different interpretations of the same event by different history nerds

  • @thomaszaccone3960
    @thomaszaccone3960 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Amazing how two people can read the same history and come up with such different perspectives. Richard II was a tragedy, not a monstrosity. At least by the standards of the time.

    • @kamion53
      @kamion53 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Shakespeare's Richard II is a tragedy, the real Richard of Bordeaux was actually a spoiled brat with no brakes. Nobody told him at a critical age how to take counsel and compromise. And that went of the rails at later age.

    • @thomaszaccone3960
      @thomaszaccone3960 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kamion53 Read Costain's "The Last Plantagenets" it might change your mind about him.

    • @aarons6935
      @aarons6935 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@thomaszaccone3960Richard was a tyrant, not even remotely debatable.

  • @joyboy_3165
    @joyboy_3165 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    İt's strange how John of Gaunt just gets a simple passing mention in all this when in retrospect he is one of the most important figures in English history.

    • @michaeldefeo1439
      @michaeldefeo1439 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I totally agree and they dont even mention Edmund Langley (John of Gaunts other younger brother but who was older then Gloucester and he was the Duke of York) and what makes it a shame is Richard II when he left the country, he left his Uncle Edmund of Langley in charge of the country while he was away, so that is who Henry Bolingbroke/Henry IV had to face when he decided to go for the crown when he invaded. I think Edmund let his nephew Henry Bolingbroke just take the throne with very little convincing but it still would be interesting to get yo know how that conversation and discussion went.

    • @dpej5167
      @dpej5167 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I absolutely agree. John of Gaunt, together with his third wife (and former mistress) Katherine Swynford (later titled Beaufort), were ancestors of all English kings after Edward IV. Not only did their son become Henry IV who deposed Richard II, but she was also the ancestor of Henry VII, first of the Tudors, who bested Richard III, to end the War of the Roses. The life of Katherine Swynford is fascinating, and yes John of Gaunt was a masterful politician.

  • @davidwebb5002
    @davidwebb5002 6 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    Richard died less than half a mile from my house.
    Pontefract for the win!

    • @yvetteirizarry9537
      @yvetteirizarry9537 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      David Webb: Oh my, so you do live in a historical place..surrounded by ghosts!!!

    • @kibble24
      @kibble24 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      As someone who lives in California, that is unbelievably cool to me. The oldest stuff around here is barely 200 years old... And that's a rarity at that

    • @Spurr_ovo
      @Spurr_ovo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Hello fellow Yorkshireman:) I’m from Wakefield aswell. Closest historical thing near me is Sandal castle where Richard III died trying to take the throne and the start of the War Of The Roses

    • @sandra-jones
      @sandra-jones 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kibble24 I think you should look again.

    • @blazednlovinit
      @blazednlovinit 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Castleford here (next town along from Pontefract). Our town's "thing" is that it was a roman fort in the first century.

  • @everlife5697
    @everlife5697 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for uploading these!

  • @mikehenson819
    @mikehenson819 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent excellent excellent content! Loved every minute of it. Bravo!

  • @dejv019876
    @dejv019876 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What a show! Great host and also actors ...love it.

  • @snippyJ
    @snippyJ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This channel makes this world history fanatic so happy.

  • @pamelynparrish8785
    @pamelynparrish8785 7 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Excellent documentary!

    • @wcstevens7
      @wcstevens7 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Pamelyn Parrish ...First class history lesson, well done ,and thank you.

  • @yvetteirizarry9537
    @yvetteirizarry9537 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love history!!! I read a lot about the Plantagenets but it feel better seeying it,than imagining it....

  • @soccerchamp0511
    @soccerchamp0511 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Thanks for this great documentary series, TIMELINE! Have you made one about the Lancaster dynasty? If not, you definitely should.

    • @jaybee4118
      @jaybee4118 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      soccerchamp0511 they didn’t make this one, channel 5 in the UK did.

  • @AlexS-oj8qf
    @AlexS-oj8qf 7 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    So basically he's Joffrey Baratheon?

  • @sorceressofaeaea
    @sorceressofaeaea 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    An enjoyable documentary, but it left many details uncovered. For example, John of Gaunt's (who was Henry Bolingbroke's father) role as senior nobleman in the land was barely mentioned. I would say that Richard was the king as long as he had his uncle's support. The whole Appellant crisis started when John was out of the country, and only his return saved Dickon from deposition. Nevertheless Richard detested and feared the House of Lancaster, and this fear eventually became the reason of his fall. Stealing Henry Bolingbroke's inheritance was a very stupid thing to do.

    • @jmo2104
      @jmo2104 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you, many things left out.

  • @ramairgto72
    @ramairgto72 7 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    British have some strange complicated history. .. ... You can almost forgive Rome for crazy stuff, this seems a bit more personal.

    • @kensebego199
      @kensebego199 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Britain is like Rome's kid so Nah lol they both guilty

  • @GL-ys8je
    @GL-ys8je 7 ปีที่แล้ว +106

    Now I know why the english hate the french.

    • @faro717
      @faro717 6 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Because in many ways, the English are -or rather were- the French.

    • @Baseballnfj
      @Baseballnfj 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      The histories and commonality between the English and French are inexpexpirably linked. In many eras there were few distinctions. Plantagenet is agnlisized Occitian French for yellow flower. And in modern times they were allies in some of the greatest conflicts in human history. This definitely should not be a hatred.

    • @jamiejamie9549
      @jamiejamie9549 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hate's a strong word, try certainty we are better than them.... joking... 😒

    • @faro717
      @faro717 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @benvolio mozart Indeed, one can even write English in French: Toupies, menottes, toupies...d'hâte, hisse deux couettes jeunes!...

    • @leod-sigefast
      @leod-sigefast 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@faro717 Not at all. The royals and the nobles yes, but the English people are English (of British and Anglo-Saxon stock).

  • @jenmb2679
    @jenmb2679 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Finally a doc about a Royal Family that I will remember, because there is a title i can remember.

  • @yaboyed5779
    @yaboyed5779 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This is the history I wanted to learn in school, I would have never called history boring then😔

  • @dewy200884
    @dewy200884 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I would love to see a sequel for these series which eventually leads to modern era !

    • @andyskinner3534
      @andyskinner3534 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Britain's bloody crown follows up to Henry VII

  • @jtshark2547
    @jtshark2547 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love that this is on youtube

  • @alinatatarko218
    @alinatatarko218 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome series 😍 Thank you for your amazing work!

  • @michaeldefeo1439
    @michaeldefeo1439 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    "The crown of England had passed down legitimately through eight generations, since Henry II established the Plantagenet dynasty 2 and half centuries earlier, Henry IV's coronation changed all that" to be honest I'm not sure if that is true. After Richard Lionheart/Richard I, the 2nd Plantagent king died without any legitimate children the crown went to his youngest brother who became King John I, but they had a brother named Prince Geoffrey who was younger than King Richard I and older than King John I. Now Geoffrey died before Richard I but he had a legitimate son named Arthur and if we are gonna talk about the crown passing legitimately within the Plantagent dynasty, then after Richard I died the next King should have been his nephew Arthur and Not his younger brother John. But John seized the crown, I believe with support from his mother and then captured and had his nephew Arthur killed.

    • @michaeldefeo1439
      @michaeldefeo1439 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Hornyshark I never doubted that by John taking the crown instead of Arthur that it wasnt passed down within the Plantagenet Dynasty. All I'm saying is the narrator made it seem like that Henry IV/Bolingbroke was the first one within the Plantagenet Dynasty to usurp the crown from another member in the Plantagenet Dynasty, but I think I disagree bc John usurped it from his nephew Arthur, but as u said it still was a Plantagent family member taking the crown bc the Plantagent dynasty didnt end until Richard III died in the battle of Bosworth against Henry Tudor/Henry VII.
      The 14 Plantagenet rulers were:
      1) Henry II - 1st Platagent King
      2) Richard I/Richard Lionheart - son of Henry II
      3) John I - younger brother of Richard I and youngest son of Henry II
      4) Henry III - son of John I
      5) Edward I/Edward Longshanks - son of Henry III
      6) Edward II - son of Edward I/Edward Longshanks
      7) Edward III - son of Edward II
      8) Richard II - grandson of Edward III and son of Edward the Black Prince(who died before his father Edward III. And was the oldest son of Edward III to live to adulthood)
      9) Henry IV/Henry Bolingbroke - usurped the crown from Richard II. Was the grandson of Edward III and was the son of John of Gaunt who was the 3rd oldest son of Edward III to live to adulthood.
      10) Henry V - son of Henry IV/Henry Bolingbroke
      11) Henry VI - son of Henry V
      12) Edward IV - usurped the crown from Henry VI. Was a descendant from both Edward III's 2nd oldest son to live to adulthood Lionel Antwerp(descendant from the female line) and 4th oldest son to live to adulthood Edmund York (descendant from the male line)
      11 again) Henry VI - supporters won him back his crown
      12 again) Edward IV - won his crown back.
      13) Edward V - was declared King but was never crowned King and he was the son of Edward IV
      14) Richard III - younger Brother of Edward IV, usurped crown from his nephew Edward V and died in the Battle of Bosworth and was the last King of the Plantagenet dynasty.

    • @crhu319
      @crhu319 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There would have been a crisis about whether he is Arthur I or Arthur II. Kid had to go.

  • @megankeil5228
    @megankeil5228 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Timeline is the best history channel!

  • @rosemarylawford5155
    @rosemarylawford5155 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    An outstanding series! The commentator is brilliant!

  • @th06061944
    @th06061944 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Concisely and powerfully presented -- great history and great acting and staging.

  • @russisaac813
    @russisaac813 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fabulous series, I enjoyed this so much I am going to watch it all again.

  • @demo777slots
    @demo777slots หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is my favorite documentary series on YT.

  • @Tree_Dee
    @Tree_Dee 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Just finished watching all 4. YIKES!