The AHEAD round is AA round of the future. Aselsan ATOM 35mm is a similar type of ammunition. Both rounds are highly advanced proximity rounds. Great, great advancements in AA ammunition.
@Teochewtuahang The difference is the microsecond targeting ability by utilizing multiple onboard computers, radars, and thermal systems that are integrated together. WW2 AA rounds relied on proximity fuses and the "Gunners' Ability to Predict" aircraft location. The "Gunners' Ability to Predict" has been replaced by multiple sensors (radars & thermal) used in conjunction with multiple threaded on-board computers to determine the aircraft location. That calculated location is determined multiple times per second and fed into the targeting system and 35mm round itself. All this happens in real time.
@@Phapchamplight armour, infantry & low flying aircraft. A shortage of air threats & effective against ground targets it's no wonder used in direct fire support.
Kleiner Tipp von einem besorgten Fachmann: 1.Ganz viele MG 3 zum Einsatz bringen(auf 1500 Schuß/min umstellen.) 2.Sperrfeuerwand bis ca. 3000m nutzen. 3.Den Rest erledigt der Gepard. Zur Erinnerung: EIN Feuerstoß des Gepards kostet soviel wie ein neues MG3. Vielleicht kann man die Zielerfassung des Gepard zusätzlich nutzen. Ich glaube das Geräusch des Abwehrfeuers würde vielen betroffenen Menschen gefallen:))Ah, verstehe! Ja, das ergibt absolut Sinn und ist eine praktikable Idee. Das Zielerfassungssystem des GEPARD kann natürlich Informationen zur Position und Bewegung einer Drohne liefern, die dann akustisch an die MG-3-Stellungen weitergegeben werden. So können die MG-3-Schützen gezielt darauf vorbereitet werden, wann und aus welcher Richtung die Drohnen kommen, ohne dass die MGs automatisch gesteuert werden müssten. Dieser Ansatz könnte vor allem in Situationen nützlich sein, in denen die MG-3-Schützen ansonsten nur eingeschränkte Sicht auf den Anflugbereich haben. Die akustische Übermittlung der Koordinaten würde ihnen dann die Möglichkeit geben, gezielter zu agieren und schneller zu reagieren.
Well done AiTelly 👌 keep up the good work! I have to mention that the company providing the doppler radar (or other household items 😅) is called "Siemens" in Germany Guys, will we get to see a video about the Pantsir short range air defense? How does the missile guidance work? Additionaly to the radar the Pantsir seems to be using some optoelectronics which are installed on the top of the turret.
Siemens provides "slightly" more than that. Things like Trains (ICE) or even until recently nuclear power plants. And just about anything industrial and electrical from tiny to gigantic. It is massive and one of Germanys biggest companies. Think german General Electric. Also the unit of electrical conductivity is "Siemens" after it's founder, a pioneer of electrifying industry.
Great channel but too many mistakes and redundancy in what you talked about… you mentioned the rate of fire 3 times with different info, shilka’s wrong data, different ranges for efficiency of guns. Too much back and forth in the beginning too. At 6:50 you say twice “not even the smallest aircraft can pass through this path of subprojectile…” all this makes it feel unprofessional. It’s a great start and the 3D is amazing but keep it simpler and more importantly proof read better. Thanks for your work, can’t wait to see when you’ll improve
*PAY no attention to the prices.* They are from different years for different configurations, as well as often listed for international buyers, not indicating how much they cost to produce for the countries’ budgets. Also, the systems displayed in the video are old, there are newer models from the countries.
Without a doubt the Rheinmetall it is one of the world's best maker of this systems and other similar weapon systems. Not just a Gepard, here we have and the newer models, like a: 'Sky shield', 'Sky ranger', the newest 'Sky ranger' 30mm with KCA cannon, which comes in combination with two missiles and one laser cannon, Oerlikon Millenium CIWS and so on. Anyway with all respect to all other prominent competitors, like French Nexter, Turkish 'Aselsan Korkut 35mm', Korean 'K30 Biho', Russian 'Tunguska'/'Pantsir S' and other similar systems. But for me generally speaking the German Rheinmetall it's simply the best.
1:57 Obviously Tunguska costs more because it is the only vehicle here with missiles which can bring down targets at a longer range of around 10km & has a much powerful and sophisticated radar to detect targets and guide missiles at that range. All other vehicles have only guns which have a very short realistic range of just 2-3km which require much simpler and less powerful radars than Tunguska.
Wrong Gepard can also have missiles but Ukraine needs it now for protecting its infrastructure and cities so it is much more cost effective. Gepard is more precise and more deadly and still cheaper.
@@jamesmorrison4976 You obviously don´t know the difference between max range and effective range. And you should not leave your political inclinations dictate your opinion of weapon systems. The Tunguska radar is vastly superior to the Gepard.
I believe there is a Gepard variant with anti-air missiles alongside the guns too. I cannot find any information of it online outside of Reddit, but I found photos of Gepards with missiles (I think stinger MANPADS) strapped to them.
Yes there is the "Flakpanzer Gepard with Stinger" (a bit disappointed by the naming here), having a twin Stinger system mounted to the right cannon. So, if you see a picture with stingers mounted to the left cannon, it is a fake.
The missile "cousin" of the Gepard is called the Roland. It uses either the same Leopard 1 chassis or is mounted on a truck. It was phased out by the German armed forces in 2005.
@@xXxxXx-br4rj It didn't enter* production. In fact it did, the Roland system existed alongside the Gepard, both systems have been put out of service years ago now, though.
So, guns fire automatically after lock? In WarThunder you have to aim well even if target is locked and even then is difficult to KO him before he kill you.
The ZSU-23-4 Shilka is armed with four TWENTY-THREE mm autocannons, not 14.5mm heavy machine guns as described in the video. The Gepard's three-man crew consists of driver, tank commander, and GUNNER- as the guns are autocannons, it has no need for a loader. How did your researchers and editors miss such glaring mistakes?
0:33, 2:56 "This tank is operated by a crew of three people. A commander, a driver and a loader." 3:35 "This is the hatch shared by the commander and the gunner." hm... Also some more corrections and details: The gunner is sitting on the right and the commander sitting on the left side of the turret. That thing on top of the left side periscope is a (removable) remote control the commander can use to turn and aim the turret when standing and looking out of the opened hatch. It also has some optics with a small zoom as far as I remember. Fire control computer is sitting in the back, behind the gunner and commander. It takes almost the whole space of the turret behind the crew. In front are only displays and controls. There is nothing transfered to the tracking radar. The gunner sees the search radar pings on a screen and marks any target there. Then the tracking radar is activated, opens up and tries to get a lock on the marked target which can fail and needs to be checked by the gunner. The IFF is signaled by a small box if the target is identified as friend or foe, but the gunner always uses optical reconnisance (through the periscope) to validate the target. Then the gunner can pull the trigger (push actually) and open fire. Also the search radar is really only for searching the sky, the tracking is only done with the tracking radar. Hence the names. And aditionally, the search radar can stay down/off when there is radar data transfered over radio, from a big radar somewhere else or from awacs. Source: I was a gepard gunner. (some time ago so I don't know the newest upgrades. But I don't think things changed that much.) But all in all a nice video. Keep it up. Edit: Bit nitpicking, but you would never shoot on a target moving away from you (as depicted in some parts of the video here).
The German Never should decomsissioned this powerful and accurate Weapon System. I Hope they actived a similar Upgraded Version of the Gepard. As we See it works Great vs Drones, Helicopters and to a certain degree Missiles…
The Germans* never* should have* decomissioned ... But good they did. That system is awfully expensive, its radar is outdated and it's a nightmare to maintain.
@@einundsiebenziger5488 i dont know Man. Vs Drone War the best and Most effective Tool we get, the Ukraines said. And thats what i was thinking. We should make a new Version if the Gepard, better and easier to Maintain but on the same Principe. And it seems Drone War is the thing atm…
@@Aitelly well it got newer upgrades resulting its price higher, Russia already have a more effective system and more mobile called Pantsir-S1. it can fire on the move but it recommended to fire in static since the recoils are quite strong bcs it use Kamaz truck as its chassis
@@Aitelly it is really the toned down version of the Pantsir system. Same guns, cheaper missiles and radar, smaller, with shorter range and tracked mobility. Shalka-23-4 modernization with upgraded radar and strella missiles is what is comparable to the Gepard. The modernization of Shalka-23-4 is better than Gepard but only shoots 23mm rounds.
Gephard AA is not compatibel with air burst amunition. Sensors at end of barrel is only for measuring speed of projectile. But its maybe possible to integreate. The Gephard is much older than air burst amunition. The next generation of german AA will have one barrel with air burst amunition
The german Gepard A2 version was upgraded to airburst (ahaed) ammo in late ´90/early 20´ along with a digital fire control system. This is now the problem in ammunition supply, because german stocks are empty and it is only produced in switzerland, who denie supplying countries in war.
Fact checkers failed miserably. Main cons is range which is small and shilka has 23mm guns. Tunguska has 8 missiles making it far more capable. Common guys
sadly orlikon company does not exist anymore. Currently rights to all of their guns have Rhinemetall with some permanent licenses sprinkled around the world during liquidation of the company. If you want same guns as gepard you have to get it from germany but exist possiblity that soon it might be avaliable in poland as well (although i'm not sure if license polish state bought includes ability to sell them abroad) as they recently started aquireing and fielding them after 30 years from date of aquitisiton, so they might want to start a local production of thoose autocanons.
You mentioned two times different figures. 1. Rouns per min 1.100 or 500. 2. Effective distance 4km and 5km. What’s correct? Are there other incorrect informations?
I wonder why the author emphasized that the shilka on asphalt is transported on car trailers? all of these vehicles have caterpillar chassis that destroy the road surface and they are all transported on trailers. 'shilka' has excellent characteristics of cross-country ability and speed surpassing the indicated analogues. so why did it only need to say 'transported on a protractor' ??? I even had a doubt that the author added analogues to the comparison. as far as everyone knows, a wide variety of anti-aircraft systems have been created in the USSR, but the most important thing is that many new such systems have already been created in Russia. Why are only the specified ones selected?
"Advanced electronics" is a cute expression when you consider it was introduced in 1976. In fact even the successor to the Gepard is now being replaced already. I also don't think the Gepard can shoot the AHEAD munition. There is a 35mm variant but that is for the MANTIS and the related systems such as the Skyranger. The Gepard munition has a belt carving which is why it had to be reproduced by Rheinmetall specifically for Ukraine. I doubt Rheinmetall makes AHEAD munition with a belt carving and that the Gepards are upgraded with an induction system.
I agree 110% we can even think this "thing" cannot distinguish friends from ennemies, we would all laught to see Shilkas or tunguska on russians side. Germans sent 30 Guépards with only 6000 rounds at start ( to show it's useless ?) ammos just rebuilt in ... Swiss. 30 units 4 km range on 900km front is a joke.Only logical use for 🇺🇦I think is demining or use it like serbians did with Shilka against troops ( civilians in Serbia). This guepards in Ukraine are totaly outdated ( optronics) just good to say "we gave tons.." bad joke.😒
The FAPDS round is the most advanced round the Gepard can fire. The AHEAD programmable munition is for different platforms. This has nothing to do with the Gepard.
But it can be fooled by dropping Portable Radar by air. Portable radar generates same frequency response waves, so the system confuses and miss the target. Low orbit regional satellites also do this but in another way.
Kinda a mute point listing the M163 series VADS since the US Army completely phased it out of service by 1995, replacing it with both the BSFV and Linebacker.
the Shilka got 23mm not 14.5mm
Apologies for the mistake
Yeah just ask war thunder
@@johnhemryjson8673 haha yeah just ask war thunder players they know those sorts of things!
@@andreyoung8732 well they leak the documents most of the time
@@marshalljulie3676 yes so we know it very well
The AHEAD round is AA round of the future. Aselsan ATOM 35mm is a similar type of ammunition. Both rounds are highly advanced proximity rounds. Great, great advancements in AA ammunition.
Yes agreed 👍
@@Aitelly Shilka caliber is not 14.5 mm but 23 mm.
Eh. Most AA ammunition in WW2 also work that way.
@Teochewtuahang The difference is the microsecond targeting ability by utilizing multiple onboard computers, radars, and thermal systems that are integrated together.
WW2 AA rounds relied on proximity fuses and the "Gunners' Ability to Predict" aircraft location. The "Gunners' Ability to Predict" has been replaced by multiple sensors (radars & thermal) used in conjunction with multiple threaded on-board computers to determine the aircraft location. That calculated location is determined multiple times per second and fed into the targeting system and 35mm round itself. All this happens in real time.
@@Teochewtuahang Not at all. WW2 AA guns worked with a time fuse that was set by purely guesswork by the gunners
These systems are surprisingly good in mountain and city warfare due to their ability to fire upwards at high angles
Syrian rebels pretty much use their shilkas as a self propelled autocannon
@@Phapchamplight armour, infantry & low flying aircraft. A shortage of air threats & effective against ground targets it's no wonder used in direct fire support.
It could be misunderstood. The rate of fire is 550 rounds per barrel.
Yes agreed per round per barrel we missed that
Another amazing video, but Shilka is 23 x 4 guns
Yes agreed we missed that
@@Aitelly you also misspelled "Siemens"....
Kleiner Tipp von einem besorgten Fachmann:
1.Ganz viele MG 3 zum Einsatz bringen(auf 1500 Schuß/min umstellen.) 2.Sperrfeuerwand bis ca. 3000m nutzen.
3.Den Rest erledigt der Gepard.
Zur Erinnerung: EIN Feuerstoß des Gepards kostet soviel wie ein neues MG3.
Vielleicht kann man die Zielerfassung des Gepard zusätzlich nutzen.
Ich glaube das Geräusch des Abwehrfeuers würde vielen betroffenen Menschen gefallen:))Ah, verstehe! Ja, das ergibt absolut Sinn und ist eine praktikable Idee. Das Zielerfassungssystem des GEPARD kann natürlich Informationen zur Position und Bewegung einer Drohne liefern, die dann akustisch an die MG-3-Stellungen weitergegeben werden. So können die MG-3-Schützen gezielt darauf vorbereitet werden, wann und aus welcher Richtung die Drohnen kommen, ohne dass die MGs automatisch gesteuert werden müssten.
Dieser Ansatz könnte vor allem in Situationen nützlich sein, in denen die MG-3-Schützen ansonsten nur eingeschränkte Sicht auf den Anflugbereich haben. Die akustische Übermittlung der Koordinaten würde ihnen dann die Möglichkeit geben, gezielter zu agieren und schneller zu reagieren.
Well done AiTelly 👌 keep up the good work!
I have to mention that the company providing the doppler radar (or other household items 😅) is called "Siemens" in Germany
Guys, will we get to see a video about the Pantsir short range air defense?
How does the missile guidance work? Additionaly to the radar the Pantsir seems to be using some optoelectronics which are installed on the top of the turret.
👍 Ok will do after we finished a few tanks ahead in our pipeline
Siemens provides "slightly" more than that. Things like Trains (ICE) or even until recently nuclear power plants. And just about anything industrial and electrical from tiny to gigantic. It is massive and one of Germanys biggest companies. Think german General Electric.
Also the unit of electrical conductivity is "Siemens" after it's founder, a pioneer of electrifying industry.
Great channel but too many mistakes and redundancy in what you talked about… you mentioned the rate of fire 3 times with different info, shilka’s wrong data, different ranges for efficiency of guns. Too much back and forth in the beginning too. At 6:50 you say twice “not even the smallest aircraft can pass through this path of subprojectile…” all this makes it feel unprofessional.
It’s a great start and the 3D is amazing but keep it simpler and more importantly proof read better.
Thanks for your work, can’t wait to see when you’ll improve
Next we are going to make it better this was an old video we made about 9 months ago.
So please Subscribe for next week's video
*PAY no attention to the prices.*
They are from different years for different configurations, as well as often listed for international buyers, not indicating how much they cost to produce for the countries’ budgets. Also, the systems displayed in the video are old, there are newer models from the countries.
Great job as usual. You're spoiling us with the quality of your videos.
Thank you very much! We are going to deliver even beeter Quality next.
@@Aitelly Best way is to read against the names if they're written correctly, like Siemens
Ai telly u make the best explanation of weapons and stuff, keep up the great work👌💯
@Rei thanks we tried our best.
But next week we are going to do better.
We are going inside the Abrams Tank
Without a doubt the Rheinmetall it is one of the world's best maker of this systems and other similar weapon systems.
Not just a Gepard, here we have and the newer models, like a: 'Sky shield', 'Sky ranger', the newest 'Sky ranger' 30mm with KCA cannon, which comes in combination with two missiles and one laser cannon, Oerlikon Millenium CIWS and so on.
Anyway with all respect to all other prominent competitors, like French Nexter, Turkish 'Aselsan Korkut 35mm', Korean 'K30 Biho', Russian 'Tunguska'/'Pantsir S' and other similar systems. But for me generally speaking the German Rheinmetall it's simply the best.
Another amazing video, keep up the work
Thanks @Mangle Hipper great to see you again
Definitely a drone killer.
Great was waiting for long time
Thanks 🙏👍
1:57 Obviously Tunguska costs more because it is the only vehicle here with missiles which can bring down targets at a longer range of around 10km & has a much powerful and sophisticated radar to detect targets and guide missiles at that range. All other vehicles have only guns which have a very short realistic range of just 2-3km which require much simpler and less powerful radars than Tunguska.
Obviously you are wrong Gepard effective shooting range is 5.5 km (3.4 mi)not 2 or 3 km as you said.
you seem to know the difference between active and passive radar ? not ?
They also used Tunguska's current price while for the other they stated the cost from the time they were put into service which was in the 1970s.
Wrong Gepard can also have missiles but Ukraine needs it now for protecting its infrastructure and cities so it is much more cost effective. Gepard is more precise and more deadly and still cheaper.
@@jamesmorrison4976 You obviously don´t know the difference between max range and effective range. And you should not leave your political inclinations dictate your opinion of weapon systems. The Tunguska radar is vastly superior to the Gepard.
In the age of drones this thing is really valuable
Please Subscribe
Already did
yes
Your content deserves encouragement
Thanks 🙏👍
I believe there is a Gepard variant with anti-air missiles alongside the guns too.
I cannot find any information of it online outside of Reddit, but I found photos of Gepards with missiles (I think stinger MANPADS) strapped to them.
Yes there is the "Flakpanzer Gepard with Stinger" (a bit disappointed by the naming here), having a twin Stinger system mounted to the right cannon. So, if you see a picture with stingers mounted to the left cannon, it is a fake.
They tested a version with rockets, that's right. But it didn' t entered production...
The missile "cousin" of the Gepard is called the Roland. It uses either the same Leopard 1 chassis or is mounted on a truck. It was phased out by the German armed forces in 2005.
@@xXxxXx-br4rj It didn't enter* production. In fact it did, the Roland system existed alongside the Gepard, both systems have been put out of service years ago now, though.
this person dezerve more subs
Thanks for the support 🙏👍
The Gepard looks so cool I love it
You want to have sexual intercourse with it.
Nice one AiTelly
Thanks
Pls make a video on how does the CIWS works like the American Phalanx or Russian AK-630
Honestly we haven't heard about it.
this channel is Soo Cool... and learn so much from this
Дякую за огляд!👍
It's a great channel, keep up the good work.❤❤
Gem of a channel
Thanks Roshan
2:58 I highly doubt the tank has a loader... it's a gunner
The Radar is from Siemens, not Seimens
Good video tho
cant believe a washing machine company mades military grade radars 💀
I am interested to see how the ammo feed from the ammo casing to the gun itself, I also want to see a 3D version of the ammo casing on the chassis.
Very high quality animation on video
Awesome video, so much details!
Quite good explanation and animation. Got yourself another subscriber
Very nice video. Thank you
Thanks
Tunguska Battlefield 3 👌
Greece has done the same using older tank chassis and mounting the Artemis anti aricraft gun on top
5:56 анимация вспышки не по центру ствола
Yeah finally new video! Amazing as always but I haven't watch the leopard video I'll make sure to watch it.
More coming next week
So, guns fire automatically after lock? In WarThunder you have to aim well even if target is locked and even then is difficult to KO him before he kill you.
Awesome 😎. Please upload videos frequently.
That's the plan! Thank You
The ZSU-23-4 Shilka is armed with four TWENTY-THREE mm autocannons, not 14.5mm heavy machine guns as described in the video. The Gepard's three-man crew consists of driver, tank commander, and GUNNER- as the guns are autocannons, it has no need for a loader.
How did your researchers and editors miss such glaring mistakes?
0:33, 2:56 "This tank is operated by a crew of three people. A commander, a driver and a loader."
3:35 "This is the hatch shared by the commander and the gunner."
hm... Also some more corrections and details:
The gunner is sitting on the right and the commander sitting on the left side of the turret. That thing on top of the left side periscope is a (removable) remote control the commander can use to turn and aim the turret when standing and looking out of the opened hatch. It also has some optics with a small zoom as far as I remember.
Fire control computer is sitting in the back, behind the gunner and commander. It takes almost the whole space of the turret behind the crew. In front are only displays and controls.
There is nothing transfered to the tracking radar. The gunner sees the search radar pings on a screen and marks any target there. Then the tracking radar is activated, opens up and tries to get a lock on the marked target which can fail and needs to be checked by the gunner. The IFF is signaled by a small box if the target is identified as friend or foe, but the gunner always uses optical reconnisance (through the periscope) to validate the target. Then the gunner can pull the trigger (push actually) and open fire.
Also the search radar is really only for searching the sky, the tracking is only done with the tracking radar. Hence the names.
And aditionally, the search radar can stay down/off when there is radar data transfered over radio, from a big radar somewhere else or from awacs.
Source: I was a gepard gunner. (some time ago so I don't know the newest upgrades. But I don't think things changed that much.)
But all in all a nice video. Keep it up.
Edit: Bit nitpicking, but you would never shoot on a target moving away from you (as depicted in some parts of the video here).
Please make a video how iron dome works and laser air defense system, you guys are very nice I love your videos ♥️
Bro can you do Bramos as well
Yes will finish the Abrams the Challenger 2 thanks as well as the T90 tank so will start from there
The German Never should decomsissioned this powerful and accurate Weapon System. I Hope they actived a similar Upgraded Version of the Gepard. As we See it works Great vs Drones, Helicopters and to a certain degree Missiles…
The Germans* never* should have* decomissioned ... But good they did. That system is awfully expensive, its radar is outdated and it's a nightmare to maintain.
@@einundsiebenziger5488 i dont know Man. Vs Drone War the best and Most effective Tool we get, the Ukraines said. And thats what i was thinking. We should make a new Version if the Gepard, better and easier to Maintain but on the same Principe. And it seems Drone War is the thing atm…
Question : how are the rounds programmed ? mechanical or electrical through some microcontrollers , i guess mechanical. but how
These are the new Rounds AHEAD rounds so as per the company they are programmed through Software.
But they have a price tag
Excellent animation great work
Thanks 🙏👍
Solid work 👌🏻
Tunguska is really in a class by itself. It abilities far surpass just being an anti- air gun.
Why is it so special I was wondering why the $16 million price tag
@@Aitelly well it got newer upgrades resulting its price higher, Russia already have a more effective system and more mobile called Pantsir-S1. it can fire on the move but it recommended to fire in static since the recoils are quite strong bcs it use Kamaz truck as its chassis
yes, tunguska is more like CIWS or C-RAM. Instead with gepard, he is more on par with Centurion CRAM and Oerlikon Skyshield
Tungiska has short anti air missiles too that's far superior to what this can offer.
@@Aitelly it is really the toned down version of the Pantsir system. Same guns, cheaper missiles and radar, smaller, with shorter range and tracked mobility.
Shalka-23-4 modernization with upgraded radar and strella missiles is what is comparable to the Gepard. The modernization of Shalka-23-4 is better than Gepard but only shoots 23mm rounds.
Gephard AA is not compatibel with air burst amunition. Sensors at end of barrel is only for measuring speed of projectile. But its maybe possible to integreate. The Gephard is much older than air burst amunition.
The next generation of german AA will have one barrel with air burst amunition
The german Gepard A2 version was upgraded to airburst (ahaed) ammo in late ´90/early 20´ along with a digital fire control system. This is now the problem in ammunition supply, because german stocks are empty and it is only produced in switzerland, who denie supplying countries in war.
@@J150278HC thats not correct. Here is a list of use amunition: HE / HE-T / FAPDS / HVAPDS / UEB-T / DM28 Manöver / DM20 Ex
compatible*, integrate*, German*, ammunition*
@@J150278HC in Switzerland*, which* denies* supplying ...
I love this thing we should make a new one its 50 years old . Beautiful videos on tube with these killing cruise missiles.
The new one is the Skyranger
shilka has quad 23mm cannons
Apologies for the mistake
Fact checkers failed miserably. Main cons is range which is small and shilka has 23mm guns. Tunguska has 8 missiles making it far more capable. Common guys
Come* on*,* guys.
Make video for the t 72 p😊
A good short range & distinct anti Aircraft defences.
sadly orlikon company does not exist anymore. Currently rights to all of their guns have Rhinemetall with some permanent licenses sprinkled around the world during liquidation of the company.
If you want same guns as gepard you have to get it from germany but exist possiblity that soon it might be avaliable in poland as well (although i'm not sure if license polish state bought includes ability to sell them abroad) as they recently started aquireing and fielding them after 30 years from date of aquitisiton, so they might want to start a local production of thoose autocanons.
You mentioned two times different figures. 1. Rouns per min 1.100 or 500. 2. Effective distance 4km and 5km. What’s correct? Are there other incorrect informations?
I wonder why the author emphasized that the shilka on asphalt is transported on car trailers? all of these vehicles have caterpillar chassis that destroy the road surface and they are all transported on trailers. 'shilka' has excellent characteristics of cross-country ability and speed surpassing the indicated analogues. so why did it only need to say 'transported on a protractor' ??? I even had a doubt that the author added analogues to the comparison. as far as everyone knows, a wide variety of anti-aircraft systems have been created in the USSR, but the most important thing is that many new such systems have already been created in Russia. Why are only the specified ones selected?
Thanks a lot. Please make a video about russian T90 tank and american apache helicopter.
T90 will come in a few. Weeks currently modeling it
@@Aitelly thanks man, keep up the good work.
I remember hearing this for the first time in a Luetin09 warhammer40k video
At 1:22 you claim the Shilka has 14,5mm machine guns, this is wrong. It has 4 23mm cannons, hence the name "ZSU 23 4"
Yes agreed we missed that one
Amazing video, so interesting as usual
Thanks 🙏👍
"Advanced electronics" is a cute expression when you consider it was introduced in 1976. In fact even the successor to the Gepard is now being replaced already. I also don't think the Gepard can shoot the AHEAD munition. There is a 35mm variant but that is for the MANTIS and the related systems such as the Skyranger. The Gepard munition has a belt carving which is why it had to be reproduced by Rheinmetall specifically for Ukraine. I doubt Rheinmetall makes AHEAD munition with a belt carving and that the Gepards are upgraded with an induction system.
I agree 110% we can even think this "thing" cannot distinguish friends from ennemies, we would all laught to see Shilkas or tunguska on russians side. Germans sent 30 Guépards with only 6000 rounds at start ( to show it's useless ?) ammos just rebuilt in ... Swiss. 30 units 4 km range on 900km front is a joke.Only logical use for 🇺🇦I think is demining or use it like serbians did with Shilka against troops ( civilians in Serbia). This guepards in Ukraine are totaly outdated ( optronics) just good to say "we gave tons.." bad joke.😒
Спасибо, догоним до 1м лайков.
Amazing video ❤
Thanks 🙏👍
Hi exelent work the one small error the Soviet Silka has 23mm guns
Yes agreed 23 mm
Is there a particular reason for calling a SPAAG a tank?
Honestly-Just to get views.
@@Aitelly thank you for the prompt and honest reply :)
You've got great animations, keep it up!
The targeting process has one more step:
Since an Upgrade the last measurement is done by an laser rangefinder.
So what voice software is used
by the text of the video and missing words, I'm guessing this is a Chinese made video
Romania has 39 Gepards 😆!
Awesome 👍
The FAPDS round is the most advanced round the Gepard can fire. The AHEAD programmable munition is for different platforms. This has nothing to do with the Gepard.
Hey next vid can y’all do the t 14 armarta
3:04 It's "its" not "it's"
Thnaks LegoEddy for thr Feedback
general dynamics pomona had a "divad" system in 1982, same format.
Pls how does pantsir-s1 works
🇧🇷 ótima matéria!!!!
Penstir is likely the best one
It's the driver and gunman skills
Christine Lambrecht should have watched that video
🙃
Why not display the Shilka with the 23mm guns ?
guys can I do the narration?
No offense, but I would do it better and for free. I love these animations and they deserve a better narration
Thank you for spoling us with more amazing content.
What is your next video?
Abrams- Challenger 2- T90
This time we will be making the interior also.
But it can be fooled by dropping Portable Radar by air. Portable radar generates same frequency response waves, so the system confuses and miss the target. Low orbit regional satellites also do this but in another way.
in today's warfare a M163 Vulcan (30 MM) six-barrel rotary cannon can easily be mounted on any of the current crop of UGVs . . .
Thank u 🎉🎉
The company that makes the radar is called Siemens*, not "Seimens".
bro can you make your model in 2d (mean in Image format ) it helps in modding in world conqueror games
Can you give us a proper brief.
Impressive video. I think the Vulcan should make a come back
Thanks 🙏👍
And how does the gun work?
You are a great boy.
Thanks 🙏👍
Gepard Anti Aircraft Tank : ❌
Just cause 4 anti air tank: ✅
The tunguska is so expensive because it wayyyyy more advanced even has missiles
Can you Make video on Indian made Prachand or LCH and First Aircraft carrier
the shilka uses 4 23mm guns. Thus ZSU 23-4 Shilka.
1:06 Ah yes the тангаска!.... 🤦🏻♂️
There is no explicit loader in the tank crew, it's a gunner.
Huh I feel like the unbiased pro and cons were somewhat missing in the t90 autoloader vid.🤔
Kinda a mute point listing the M163 series VADS since the US Army completely phased it out of service by 1995, replacing it with both the BSFV and Linebacker.
it also does well anti-infantry units
Can you make video of amx leclerc tank?
it's junk!