@@عبدالعزيزالطحشل Unlike Demon's Souls this game doesn't look nearly as dated , a remake is honestly not necessary and SONY fumbled the bag on this big time , but looking at their track record as of late they have been catching L's like flies .
It was probably to have a launch title exclusive, like what Halo Infinite would have been (besides pc). If I also remember this correctly, it may have been a test for the studio before sony bought them out.
@@EL1King I mean demon souls sold terribly but well enough to justify a spiritual successor in dark souls which for 2 sequels the 4 spin offs in Bloodborne,eldenring and sekiro
@@EL1Kingmost of the “hardcore” fans actually started getting into the franchise in 2016 with ds3 i would say that’s when fromsoft went pretty mainstream in the community
I remember around 2017 sony stated that bloodborne was a niche title and did not sell that well. So sony is not going to remaster, remake or do a sequel to a game that was not a big success. I also remember when the game launched I got it day one and mostly everyone that I worked with at the time were sony fanboys and everyone had a PS4 and when I told people about bloodborne and how cool it was not a single person I worked with had any idea what bloodborne was, one co-worker even asked "is that a COD dlc?" so bloodborne proved that the vast majority of PS4 owners exclusively played COD, fortnite, FIFA, 2k and madden while they claimed "XbOx hAs nO gAmEs" when they didn't even know what games they had lol.
They know that it needs to go other places, and the fans probably won't show up again. They've waited so long now that it would cost 3-4X more than if they did a sequel back when they should've.
@@justarock9553 it's not Elden Ring and it would be exclusive... Only to flop again. You see Demon's Souls numbers? PC ponies have been asking for that since launch.
@@kidneystonecollectorr Dark Souls 2 is treated like the Red Headed step child. Bloodborne is the rebellious drop out that hits it big in an entertainment industry niche market that their parents dont understand.
@@skaynne54 no they just don't like it because you not paid them and instant of playing this games you could buy are new one of them which are in 90% of cases just garbage
The past sales numbers are irrelevant. Soulslikes in 2024 are much bigger than soulslikes in 2015, when it was a niche genre. Everyone knows FromSoft today because of Elden Ring and Sekiro and the Dark Souls series, and so a remaster/PC launch of Bloodborne is like to exceed PS4 sales, by far. I mean even AC6 sold really well on FromSoft's name alone. Reality is, Sony was probably holding it for a PS6 launch title like DeS, and the emulator community caught up with them. They just lost hundreds of million on Concord, and probably hundreds of millions on Bloodborne, because modders are going to basically remaster the game for free. Well deserved karma for holding back one of the most beloved games of the PS4 generation out of pure greed.
Spends 200m on an abomination called Concord, Ports to PC bad games nobody asked for such as Horizon, Refuses to even remaster Bloodborne, Yeah, deserves to go bankrupt. Zero idea whatsoever about what the players want.
nah dude the sad reality is that Sony isn’t going to lose money just because people are emulating it… emulating still has a lot of problems and is inaccessible for most people. hell i bet half the people who emulate the game would buy it if it got an official pc port.
@@makerofmoney11223 If people have access to something for free, why on earth would they pay for it? Especially considering most on pc have a negative opinion of Sony at the moment.
@@dreamshakejake3736 Because most of us would rather pay than pirate? Don't get me wrong, if a company refuses to sell you the product then go for it, but I'd much rather give them my money so I can have the game in my Steam library, with all the benefits therein. And I say that as one of the people with said "negative opinion".
@@TheRealist1.See, about that... Sony won't even provide a free performance patch for the game to make it run better. Fans already made one that works well, but you have to have a hacked system to use it. If they want to entice people to get their new plastic box, then they need to offer better resolution and performance than their last gen plastic box which sells for way cheaper. Why get a PS5 to play Bloodborne when it runs and looks the same as when you play it on PS4?
One simple reason: now that Elden Ring has blown up in popularity, Fromsoft will never take shit from Sony again. They won't do a sony exclusive souls like title any more. Anything they make afterwards will be day one all platform.
@@عبدالعزيزالطحشل Bloodborne is better. Smaller but more focused, it’s just perfect! The lore is also more intresting than in Elden Ring and the gameplay is more agressive. One of the best games of all time!
@@TroysSweetCornhole bro we are GAMERS we dont give two shits about story. We mostly play games for the gamplay experience which gives us enough dopamine to overcome our stress right? gow used to be so good until gow 4 came out because it took away the fast combat experience.
Amazing how a PC port is soo financially viable, you just adjust some parameters for a engine thats already in the same architecture and add some QoL changes, and get a huge player base that was not reached, some times out numbering the original release, yet Sony choose to sink millions of dollars in new and busted IPs
It probably is not that smart to do that though. The people who have a PC are more likely hardcore gamers. Bloodborne is probably only for the more hardcore gamers. So, having it stay on Ps4 would make those hardcore gamers invest in a playstation. Why do you think Sony waits before releasing on Pc, same logic
@@SpriteYagamiProblem with your logic is the fact that Sony has done nothing to make Bloodborne on PS5 better than on PS4. Fans have made a performance patch for hacked systems and it's just out there on the internet for them to implement, but they don't care to for some reason. So you end up with the weird situation where you might as well just buy a PS4 for super cheap if you just want to play Bloodborne because there's not going to be any benefit to getting the newer, more expensive system.
@@based-ys9um PC master race beat Sony to the punch and built an entire emulator just to play Bloodborne. And it runs the game at over 60fps. So shaddup. 😏
In a pre-Elden Ring world, Sony not continuing Bloodborne makes sense. But as soon as Elden Ring set the gaming world on fire, Sony should have greenlit a Bloodborne remaster, remake, or sequel. Of course, a sequel without Fromsoft would be dumb.
Because XBox just throws money at things and fails to understanding gaming. that's always been their issue. Sony has always been good at garnering studios.
Hardly anyone cares about Xbox games, which is why Microsoft is buying popular established games CoD, Minecraft, Overwatch, Elder Scrolls, Fallout, Doom etc.
Because XBox has no strategy beyond buying studios to make up for the fact they are not a gaming company or gaming centric. They inserted themselves in the market for the profit and got lucky with Halo, but it couldn't last without key people behind it. Sony understands gaming, but they saw the greed and practices of Microsoft and followed suit. Corporatization destroys anything if it goes unchecked, especially in a creative field. I liked Days Gone 2 too, but it was again, another 3rd person game using the same formula for their single-player AAA games. The fact they can sell so much with key IP is what keeps them alive, because once they cut out so many Japanese studios by censorship nor the advertising they used to. It's Western and limited to that approach, but that's all Microsoft is, too, but worse.
Sony is just plain stupid. The PS2 is one of if not the greatest consoles of all time. I think that was the beginning of the end for them. They made decisions as if they would always be on top and nothing could knock them down.
I think it was the PS3. It had so much soul behind it, which got beat by the corporate Xbox 360. So, Sony started to pivot to be more corporate in their running of PS
Disagree, I think Sony has a similar habit to Nintendo, where if they're successful they reveal their true colors, but when they're hurting a bit they're pro consumer. With Nintendo the obvious examples are the SNES being successful, Gamecube selling poorly, Wii being successful, WiiU failing completely, Switch being successful. Each success they turn into corporate monsters, and each failure forces them to play nice. With Sony it's less obvious, but you can see it after their success with the PS2 when they had the balls to release the PS3 for the price they did, and assumed people would give them money because "Playstation". When they realized the 360 was stomping them, that's when they tried to turn things around, focusing on excellent exclusives and the like and lowering the price of future PS3 models dramatically, and by the end of the generation some reports even say that the PS3 beat out the 360. They kept the momentum going a bit with the PS4, focusing on great exclusives, but you could see the cracks. Charging for multiplayer, focusing on unneeded remasters, nothing major but even so. When the PS4 curbstomped the One, that was the final nail in the coffin, and with the PS5 they revealed their true colors, thinking that they could get away with whatever they wanted. Maybe if the Pro fails, and this generation as a whole doesn't go well, it'll set them straight, but who knows.
Bloodborne has much more potential than it appears particularly on PC not on consoles. This comes down to the sales of Elden Ring not Bloodborne. If Bloodborne launched on PC all the Elden Ring fanbase would be fixed on the Bloodborne launch on PC. Alongside all the mod options from the already heavily active soulsborne modding.
I'm convinced there will never be a bloodborne 2. Sony owns the IP and Fromsoftware not falling for the okie doke from Sony. I don't see From wasting their time on a BB sequel when they can make a mult-plat and maximize profits. Especially when Sony won't even take the time to fix the frame for the PS5. They could care less about that game.
they would easily regain all the money they lost on Concord within the first 3 months of PC sales. The issue is that their sales team consist of old farts.
Something to mention is that bloodborne did not have the budget that the last of us pt 2 or spider man had , so 7 million copies is a very good number relative to that . Also a bloodborne remaster ( unlike a remake ) wouldn't cost a lot of money and as it exists in a post elden ring world , it is almost guaranteed to sell well . Now you're right that sony would prioritize a game like horizon , tlou or god of war as they sold more and appeal to a wider audience of audience, but i don't get sony complaining about not having enough original IPs then having popular ones that they do nothing with
With the shitty state of how games are these days bloodborne is most likely to succeed. It's been demonstrated multiple times that the "Modern Audience" aren't paying for games targeted to them because they're no real gamers, they're activists.
In my opinion Sony are idiots to not had made a Remake for Bloodborne for console and PC by now while focusing on other big titles that take 8yrs. They literally see the audience that have been crying for years for this. I think it would sell more than it ever has if it’s remade now because I’m sorry a remaster isn’t enough at this point in my opinion.
You do realise FromSoft have been making other stuff. They won't stop making games, Bloodborne 2 might have meant no Sekiro or no Elden Ring. I wouldn't even stress, FromSoft are independent from Sony, they can make games very similar to Bloodborne if they wanted to cash in on it without it being Bloodborne itself.
It doesnt look dated enough for a remake. A remaster on the other hand would of been good and also released on PC which is what alot of people have been asking for.
The issue is Sony doesn't want to invest as much as they need to keep it exclusive. They can pay a support studio for a remaster or a remake, knowing the latter is more expensive. However, that isn't the same as being developed by FromSoftware. It's Sony's IP so they want to keep it exclusive to PS, which is fine, but it may not reach expected returns. It would be smart to release it on PC day & date, but they know it will take away from their PS5 hardware & software sales.
@@upon-fe2720 I didn’t say they had to make a part 2 I said it’s been long enough that it should get a remake instead of a remaster now and Miyazaki himself said he’s definitely not against not against returning to the BloodBorne franchise. Sony are the idiots that never pitch the idea because they’re so out of touch with their fanbase and don’t care. They’ve returned to their PS3 era of cockiness and it’s biting them in the ass and rightfully so.
Demon's Souls sold only 1.7M but still got a (shitty) remake, so stop making up bs about sales numbers. The games that sould 20M were instantly forgotten, nobody wants or cares about them getting a sequel. People just want a BB port, which is much cheaper than a full (shitty) remake by Bluepoint.
@@salstep Bloodborne runs at 30fps on the PS4. Sony won't even release a patch to improve performance on PS5 despite the fact that fans literally made one and put it on the the internet for hacked ps5s. Also demons souls remake sucks. It alters character designs and bastardizes the world building because bluepoint doesn't understand how environmental storytelling works.
@@Patrick-bn5rp 1. 30 fps is playable. 2. just cause Bluepoint doesn't do exactly what your lord and Saviour Miyazaki does doesn't make the game bad. you guys are everything that's wrong with the soul's community. if it's fun, it's fun.
Great game but I'd argue that it didn't sell well when it needed to, sure it did sell well as cult hit down the line but Sony and any other Publisher want's those sales much sooner a year at the latest.
Good video and I think you very close to the core of the Bloodborne issue. A big thing that people rarely bring up is Sony PlayStation's move to California, change in leadership and focus. This new crew, worse than the old crew, see stuff like Bloodborne as old Sony, Studio Japan related, so modern Sony wants little to do with that. This whole thing about Sony and sales has always been a mystery to me. Days Gone is sitting at around 10 million sold and they tell us that's a failure. The Last of Us Part II has sold around 10 million with easily 3 times the budget, but that is a hit game somehow. Days Gone has made Sony way more money from game sales than The Last of Us Part II. They have just taken a $200+ million loss on Concord plus what they spent buying Firewalk, they are about to lose money on Fairgame$, Marathon is not coming out for years now, if at all, Bungie is falling apart so that was a waste of $3.6 billion and who knows what they have been paying for Final Fantasy and all their other money hatting ventures. Most of this is nonsense, egos and company politics sadly. The GaaS push is a failure and a very costly one. Maybe they will find success at some point, but the cancelled The Last of Us multiplayer game was their best bet short term. I don't know if you meant to do it, but you seem to be using casual games to mean higher sales. FromSoftware's Souls games have created a whole genre with very large and growing fanbase, with the latest games selling by far the most. Elden Ring shows just how big this audience actually is, even though Elden Rings appeal is multifaceted; Open world helps, George RR Martin's name helped and the hype helped. Bloodborne is probably a complicated case. It has sold very well, something like 8 million copy or so, just from PS4 and a bit of PS5 users. Sony owns the IP, but the tech i.e. engine is 100% FromSoftware. I think you're correct in assuming that FromSoftware are too busy doing other projects to make a Bloodborne 2, but I could see them doing a slight remaster for the 10th anniversary coming up next year. Souls games easily sell the most on PC and the one Sony game port people want, including myself is Bloodborne Remastered (not a sterile remake).
@@upon-fe2720 Don't tell me what I'm thinking of. I don't hold a single old fool like Jim Ryan responsible for turning Sony PlayStation into a failure factory. They fired loyal old Jimmy into the sun in a real hurry, with corporate speak for "he lives on a farm now". Him being gone fixes nothing for SIE. Where his head was, two or three more have spawned.
7 mil copies sold should be enough to address or improve from the feedback with a sequel. I understand not making a sequel for less than 1mil copied sold. Otherwise, they end up burying good ip they can improve upon to end up complaining that they don't have enough of ip.
The thing is, Soulslike were not as popular when Bloodborne was launched, Sony need to see the success of Dark Souls 3 and Elden Ring. Bloodborne is a highly requested game by both PS owners and PC players, the game can easily sell 15 million copies now days. Sony ports Sackboy and Rachet and Clank to PC, games that nobody asked for and yet they choose to ignore how bad people want to play a remaster of Bloodborne.
As an alternative, From Software can make a “Spiritual Successor”. That is a way to get around the Sony issue . It won’t be 1 for 1 but it could get close.
The only explanation that makes sense to me is that they’re trying to keep Fromsoftware exclusives only on PS to draw in that base. Because we’re extremely dedicated. As for a remaster not happening - absolutely no idea
it costs nothing to cap the game at 60fps and make the graphics better. Someone has already done it, and he does not have millions in the bank to spend on its creation... its just a free cash button Sony is afraid to talk about for literally no reason
One correct I would make is that you said Bloodborne sold about 7.5mil copies on an install base of about 100mil, but the install base of the PS4 was nowhere near 100mil in 2015. Bloodborne was arguably the first big name PS4 exclusive that really drove console sales, no one even talks about earlier exclusives like Killzone Shadowfall or Infamous Second Son.
Even if bloodborne got into pc, I'll never give sony money ever again or more like I can't because psn isn't available in my country No ghost of tsushima and no helldivers for me, I'll never buy a sony game even if I have the option
7:30 It seems like Sony has the goal of get people to buy the console, which will keep them no matter how long the games take to release. The 3rd party games allow for the filler. Also, studios seem to be favoring ps5 development, which causes more support for Sony (Baldurs gate)
From what I could find it looks like Demon's Souls on the PS3 sold just under 2 million copies and got a remake, so 7 million copies should be more than enough for something. Until Dawn only sold 4 million and is getting a remake, what the hell are Sony doing? Also a little perspective Spiderman 2 sold 10 million copies bringing in $700,000,000 and took $300,000,000 and 5 years to make. Xbox bring in $8,400,000,000 a year from gamepass
7M after deep discounts is not going to excite them... It's just salvaging at some point. No different than when I saw Outer Worlds on sale for 2.99, then they hyped 5M sales the next week. After you nearly give the game away you look at engagement... Did they buy it because it was a good deal, or did they interact with it? Sometimes sales are mostly good for marketing, they had no interest in funding a sequel so they never advertised it
Even more puzzling, thanks to elden ring, its not as if FromSoft is an unknown company any longer either. There is so much interest in this game right now. I only got into the souls series last year, quickly beat and did multiple play throughs of DS1, promptly quit DS2 after about 70 hours of raging (then came back recently to finally beat it), have only 1 play through of DS3 but plan to do a few NG+ runs in the near future, beat ER a METRIC FUCK TON OF TIMES. Lies of P, Lords of the Fallen, Sekiro are all on my near future to plays, that and demon souls if it ever gets a PC release (mostly because fuck sony)
I don’t understand so many things about this Bloodborne discussion. All the souls game were very niche at the beginning but have now become so popular and we literally have Elden Ring to show for it. While the beginning was tough now everybody wants more. Bloodborne has attracted so much mysticism Bloodborne would sell more than Elden Ring. That is why you and a lot of youtubers even talk about it, people will see bloodborne and will immediately click let alone buy. If someone wants to objectify how much Bloodborne would sell you only need to think it would sell as much as Elden Ring.
This explains the lack of a follow-up but not the lack of a PC port. They ported games that did way worse on console like Sackboy, which is also the type of game that would do (and did) even worse on Steam where Bloodborne would shine.
A Bloodborne remaster, PC port or even a sequel from a financial perspective I think is an absolute no-brainer. BB has reached real cult status in the target audience, From Software now has a huge reputation in mainstream gaming, there's no newly announced Soulslike from them so a BB project would be a huge HUGE deal. And considering the current narrative around Sony and PS5s exclusives line-up, even just a BB remaster would be a win. The reason why we've not gotten a BB remaster I believe are to do with BB being on old SDK that makes updating it a not insignificant technical challenge, From Software having been too busy with Elden Ring and Armored Core until recently and Bluepoint (the natural studio to handle such a project if not FS) being too busy working on their own IP for the first time. Apart from that I guess the focus on live service could have blinded Sony to the opportunity of revisiting BB.
The pc emulation as well as the Graceborne mod for Elden Ring are enough to keep players still invested in the game. Media as a form of entertainment shouldn't be hard to access, in other words, if Sony doesn't want to do anything with Bloodborne, then the fans should be allowed to.
Looking at that sales data, it almost looks like games that play like movies instead of video games are outselling actual video games. How many copies of Final Fantasy VII sold back in 1997?
Simple, the game is good, contains no DEI elements and they cannot be added before a re-release, they did not work on it. In fact, they HATE Bloodborne being their console-buying game, free from DEI bullshit and not made by themselves.Anyway, we may have it on PC before next Halloween
I have to ask, but does the Demon Souls remake not call a lot of this into question? Sony had it remade as an exclusive, knowing that it wasn't for casuals, and I'm sure they weren't expecting Spider-man of GoW sales from it. Yet they remade it nonetheless. So, to me, that says that Sony isn't as hung up on those points as this video assumes. And while yeah, ultimately it's one game, it's still a recent release, showing Sony's current mindset, and is still one of the only exclusives for the PS5. So I think it's important to consider.
This still does not explain why Bloodborne has never gotten any type of update whatsoever. Sekiro, Dark Souls III, and Elden Ring have all gotten updates to run at 60fps on PS5 hardware, but all those games are owned by FromSoftware, and we've seen proof from modders, and emulation that there is nothing wrong with the game logic if Bloodborne runs at 60fps too, but Sony hasn't even given us that for no reason. Meanwhile a game like Days Gone which had similar success to Bloodborne got higher resolution/higher frame rate patch made in-house for PS5 AND even a native PC port... something nobody asked for; on the other hand everybody is asking for a Bloodborne port and Sony knows for a fact that people want Bloodborne yet we got nothing since the DLC for that game released. I understand why we haven't gotten a sequel, a remaster or a remake of Bloodborne, and I honestly I don't want any of those if it's not made by FromSoftware themselves, but not making a PC port and at the very least a 60fps patch for PS5 makes no sense.
If Bloodborne is too niche, then I have trouble understanding why Ghost of Tsushima got a PC port since it sold 9.73 million copies before being released on PC. That figure is really close to Bloodborne's 7.5 million copies
The hype for Souls games is way bigger now after Elden Ring. But most aren't willing to buy a Playstation just for one game. There would be so many people who would buy it on PC.
Sony is right, no one wants Bloodborne 2 (specially after Elden Ring) and i agree with it, thats why they poured 400+ million into Concord, a game no one asked for or wanted 😂
Really great video and work. A bit of a challenge is that R&C got Rift Apart after selling less. And Days Gone got ditched also due to fall out w Director and egg on the face from bad reviews
Bloodborne is in a weird place. Sony isn't the type of company to send C&D letters to emulator devs. Sony is greedy, but only so far as it really shakes their bottom line. So Bloodborne falls into the category of "We care, but we don't... care." for Sony.
Well your info is wrong on Days gone. Sony didnt cancel the sequel, it was reported that the developer themselves canceled the sequel, the director was just salty.
Dang. I've seen 100+ new videos on bloodborne in just this month. Elden Ring not only had it's own sales but increased the sales of all souls games. They are irrationally dumping money in the fire every day they don't do something, anything, with bloodborne. It's no longer a niche title, it's The Mainstream.
good take on the whole thing. true, "data" and sales drives these corporate decisions but don't mean a bb remake is not possible, they did it with des. $ony knows there's a lot of interest in this ip and if they feel like wasting $400m on a game no one asked for is a bad idea and spending a faction of that on a game that guarantees sales, they might reconsider. i'm personally more interested in "chadps4" that will preserve the original more so than a remake and is looking more promising than $ony's efforts.
If we look at purely the numbers, it'll never make sense to re-release and/or Globalize Bloodborne but I bet everyone has got a few damn good reasons as to why it definitely would.
They might have thought Bloodborne was niche a while ago, but Elden Ring has completely changed the game. So many people are hooked on souls-likes because of this and would buy the game. I guarantee it would sell more now than its 2015 release.
1:15 Tbh I find it very hard to believe that BB only had 7.46 million. I would believe more like double that. I honestly had a conspiracy theory about the lack of update for BB or remake. Sony tried to fully acquire FS but was only able to get 25% so I think BB was purposely ignored as an f you to the fans bc of the lack of acquisition. Perhaps a dumb theory but I don't believe for a second that BB would not have yielded a higher revenue take over a remake of Demons Soul's. Tbh I don't want a remake just a 60 fps update but screw Sony, ShadPS4 is nearly done.
@heyguyslolGAMING THIS! People are too dismissive about these "tactics": we've seen time and time again companies do these type of things for ESG/DEI money, why wouldn't they double, or even triple, down?
I think the Elden Ring effect now changes all that data you've shown. Elden Ring has brought in so many new customers such as myself. I'd always stayed away from these games believing them too difficult. Gone back and finished every fromsoft game since beating Elden Ring.
Sony didn’t cancel Days Gone II. It was Bend’s corporate suits who denied a sequel and didn’t bring it up to PS Studios head. Days Gone director said it himself.
Your argument misses the point that Ratchet & Clank (2016) sold less than BloodBorne in the same time period but we got sequels for it anyway. Day's Gone got a PS5 patch but still sold less than BloodBorne without one. Also Demon's Souls Remake was greenlit with even less sales on PS3, and let's not forget the Concord disaster which automatically destroys Sony's decision making potential. Past sales in this case would mean nothing, specially if they release it on PC as well.
Remember that Spiderman, God of war, Uncharted and Horizon were all bundled with the PS4/5 they would never sell as much as the real games like Bloodborne or GT7 or Tsushima on it's own.
Sony just lost 400 million on Concord. People are asking for a Bloodborne 2 or a Bloodborne 4k 60fps remaster for many years. They could make millions with it. But listening to your customers is not done anno 2024 it seems...
bloodborne "failed" because it was a genre catered to a small portion of gamers, who an even smaller amount have access to a ps4. is sony puts Bloodborne on PC, they'd be looking at an UNBELIEVEABLE amount of money. if they release even the smallest trailer confirming a bloodborne remake is in the works, there'd be so much hype around it, it would take the internet by storm for weeks I guarantee it. and now after the release of Elden Ring, more people have gotten a taste of souls-likes, and now attention towards souls-likes are at an all time high
I don't agree with you, When bloodborne was released the popularity of souls like games were no where near as high as they are now. Just look at Elden Ring with over 25 million copies sold. One of the highest selling games of all time. Why? Because it's now a popular genre and the best time to release another Bloodborne game is now.
Can we assume that the top 5 selling games came with sold units of PS4? I remember seeing millions of units back in 2018 where they were selling PS4s with games like horizon and uncharted
miyasaki deberia comprar la ip y hacer un port para las consolas modernas y pc, recuperaria la inversion y tendria ganancias en 1 año, hasta podriamos tener una secuela
Mate, Sony may own the rights to the Bloodborne IP but you shouldn't imply that ANY of the current Sony studios can actually make a Soulslike game as good as FromSoftware. That's exactly why they only have games from this genre by other studios. Don't make me laugh, since Sony clearly declared where the development priorities for their studios lie when producing games and being able to create a Soulslike among those studios is not even on the table for them.
If Bloodborne is too niche then I have trouble understanding why Demon's Souls got a remake
It will get remake like demos souls but it will probably come to ps6
@@عبدالعزيزالطحشل Unlike Demon's Souls this game doesn't look nearly as dated , a remake is honestly not necessary and SONY fumbled the bag on this big time , but looking at their track record as of late they have been catching L's like flies .
Yeah...a big budget remake too.
It was probably to have a launch title exclusive, like what Halo Infinite would have been (besides pc). If I also remember this correctly, it may have been a test for the studio before sony bought them out.
@@SpriteYagami it also singlehandedly invented the highly profitable soulslike sub-genre.
So Bloodborne is too niche... But Concord was a worthwhile risk.... Alrighty then 👍👍👍 ....
Check the sales figures for the original demons souls..... Someone that not only warranted a remaster but a full on remake!
I think not many people cared about souls games before elden ring . But now if sony were to make a sequel for Bloodborne ,it will hit
@@EL1King I mean demon souls sold terribly but well enough to justify a spiritual successor in dark souls which for 2 sequels the 4 spin offs in Bloodborne,eldenring and sekiro
@@EL1Kingmost of the “hardcore” fans actually started getting into the franchise in 2016 with ds3 i would say that’s when fromsoft went pretty mainstream in the community
@@maroonstarsface
7 million install base is better than 10 people who bought concord.
Bloodborne dont need a remaster. It just needs a 60fps patch for ps5 and it will be selling a lot again.
there's no NEED for anything especially this oversaturated upscaled subculture that's been a set of doctrine over the progressive years.
I mean Elden ring bloodborne don’t look to different in graphics tbh it still looks good fromsoft never been about graphical games
@@raine6634 its artstyle, they show their strengths with artstyle
I agreed
Make it a PC port and its a guaranteed money printer.
I remember around 2017 sony stated that bloodborne was a niche title and did not sell that well. So sony is not going to remaster, remake or do a sequel to a game that was not a big success. I also remember when the game launched I got it day one and mostly everyone that I worked with at the time were sony fanboys and everyone had a PS4 and when I told people about bloodborne and how cool it was not a single person I worked with had any idea what bloodborne was, one co-worker even asked "is that a COD dlc?" so bloodborne proved that the vast majority of PS4 owners exclusively played COD, fortnite, FIFA, 2k and madden while they claimed "XbOx hAs nO gAmEs" when they didn't even know what games they had lol.
Well, they kept it exclusive. That's their fault.
They know that it needs to go other places, and the fans probably won't show up again. They've waited so long now that it would cost 3-4X more than if they did a sequel back when they should've.
If they're not capitalizing after Elden Ring and its expansion, then SONY is stupid.
@@justarock9553 it's not Elden Ring and it would be exclusive... Only to flop again. You see Demon's Souls numbers? PC ponies have been asking for that since launch.
Even in twitch and youtube chat people still ask name of the game
Bloodborne is treated like the middle child of souls games.... change my mind.
By Sony yes, by Miyazaki no
dark souls 2 plays like the middle child
@@kidneystonecollectorr Dark Souls 2 is treated like the Red Headed step child.
Bloodborne is the rebellious drop out that hits it big in an entertainment industry niche market that their parents dont understand.
As a middle child myself I felt that.
@@ZonaiHero-ul5nm dam, sorry bro
Emulation is one of the best things on PC. I'm a huge fan and supporter of it.
it's never actually functional tho 😂 you clowns cry about PC being better yet here you are melting yourselves just to play ONE of our games
@@rubainjason8875 emulation is important for game preservation period.
@@based-ys9umYep, but AAA companies doesn't understand that concept. Most of them lost their intelligence a while aho.
@@skaynne54 no they just don't like it because you not paid them and instant of playing this games you could buy are new one of them which are in 90% of cases just garbage
Honestly since ER came out, FS has way more fans than it ever did, so ironically its actually a really good idea to release BB.
BUT Elden Ring had a buttload of marketing, where as Bloodbornes marketing was almost non existent.
The real reason is Sony is actually stupid. Exhibit A: Concord
I got the feeling that Sony doesn’t know what they are doing. It’s been this way for months, maybe years.
@@Arjanator exhibit B: Bloodborne is still PS4 only
@@Agent-mb1xx bluepoints definitely going to remake Bloodborne I'd bet money on it. Unfortunately that means the original will be stuck at 30fps
@@based-ys9um if these racists do it, I am not buying
@@chantier24 Years.. Ever since they moved to California, they haven't been great
The past sales numbers are irrelevant. Soulslikes in 2024 are much bigger than soulslikes in 2015, when it was a niche genre. Everyone knows FromSoft today because of Elden Ring and Sekiro and the Dark Souls series, and so a remaster/PC launch of Bloodborne is like to exceed PS4 sales, by far. I mean even AC6 sold really well on FromSoft's name alone. Reality is, Sony was probably holding it for a PS6 launch title like DeS, and the emulator community caught up with them. They just lost hundreds of million on Concord, and probably hundreds of millions on Bloodborne, because modders are going to basically remaster the game for free. Well deserved karma for holding back one of the most beloved games of the PS4 generation out of pure greed.
Spends 200m on an abomination called Concord,
Ports to PC bad games nobody asked for such as Horizon,
Refuses to even remaster Bloodborne,
Yeah, deserves to go bankrupt. Zero idea whatsoever about what the players want.
nah dude the sad reality is that Sony isn’t going to lose money just because people are emulating it… emulating still has a lot of problems and is inaccessible for most people. hell i bet half the people who emulate the game would buy it if it got an official pc port.
@@makerofmoney11223 If people have access to something for free, why on earth would they pay for it? Especially considering most on pc have a negative opinion of Sony at the moment.
@@dreamshakejake3736Because people dont have a ps4 with bloodborne in it to dump it neither do they have a top of the line high end pc to run it
@@dreamshakejake3736 Because most of us would rather pay than pirate? Don't get me wrong, if a company refuses to sell you the product then go for it, but I'd much rather give them my money so I can have the game in my Steam library, with all the benefits therein. And I say that as one of the people with said "negative opinion".
I think Bloodbourne would smash on pc in sales. PC gamers rave about that game nonstop and FromSoft always sells a lot on PC.
Sony doesn't want it to smash PC... They want them to do it on a PlayStation.
Instead we get it for free due to Sony's inaction. Thanks Sony!
@@TheRealist1.See, about that... Sony won't even provide a free performance patch for the game to make it run better. Fans already made one that works well, but you have to have a hacked system to use it. If they want to entice people to get their new plastic box, then they need to offer better resolution and performance than their last gen plastic box which sells for way cheaper. Why get a PS5 to play Bloodborne when it runs and looks the same as when you play it on PS4?
@@TheRealist1. That makes no sense considering they are pushing their games on PC for sales.
@@Patrick-bn5rp all I'm saying is that they aren't committed to PC
One simple reason: now that Elden Ring has blown up in popularity, Fromsoft will never take shit from Sony again.
They won't do a sony exclusive souls like title any more. Anything they make afterwards will be day one all platform.
To be honest i am big fan of bloodborn but I think elder ring is better than bloodborn so They will continue make great games like bloodborn or better
That's funny because inside sources are saying Fromsoftware is working again with Sony right now
@@MiyazakisPVPexperienceon Bloodborne 2
and i swear to god if its not on pc im gonna commit- my lawyer has advised me against continuing this comment
@@عبدالعزيزالطحشلno fucking way Elden Ring is better than Bloodborne. Not even close.
@@عبدالعزيزالطحشل Bloodborne is better. Smaller but more focused, it’s just perfect! The lore is also more intresting than in Elden Ring and the gameplay is more agressive. One of the best games of all time!
The irony is that Bloodborne is a far better game than God of War, Spider-Man and all the other top-selling games.
Bloodborne is absolute Gaming
God of War is very story based than combat. Unfair comparison
@@TroysSweetCornhole bro we are GAMERS we dont give two shits about story. We mostly play games for the gamplay experience which gives us enough dopamine to overcome our stress right? gow used to be so good until gow 4 came out because it took away the fast combat experience.
@NoCranberry I'm glad I'm not part of that majority that doesn't care about the story. Get out of my face casual
@@TroysSweetCornhole whatever helps you sleep at night(also you seem like the kind of person who thinks AC Mirage is a good game... ewww you stink)
Amazing how a PC port is soo financially viable, you just adjust some parameters for a engine thats already in the same architecture and add some QoL changes, and get a huge player base that was not reached, some times out numbering the original release, yet Sony choose to sink millions of dollars in new and busted IPs
It probably is not that smart to do that though. The people who have a PC are more likely hardcore gamers. Bloodborne is probably only for the more hardcore gamers. So, having it stay on Ps4 would make those hardcore gamers invest in a playstation. Why do you think Sony waits before releasing on Pc, same logic
@@SpriteYagami Do you really believe the tiny fraction of players who buy a playstation for bloodborne is more profitable them the PC playerbase?
@@SpriteYagamiProblem with your logic is the fact that Sony has done nothing to make Bloodborne on PS5 better than on PS4. Fans have made a performance patch for hacked systems and it's just out there on the internet for them to implement, but they don't care to for some reason. So you end up with the weird situation where you might as well just buy a PS4 for super cheap if you just want to play Bloodborne because there's not going to be any benefit to getting the newer, more expensive system.
Pc "master race" begging for console scraps again??😂😂
@@based-ys9um PC master race beat Sony to the punch and built an entire emulator just to play Bloodborne. And it runs the game at over 60fps. So shaddup. 😏
bloodborne having similar numbers to days gone actually makes me sick
Both are great games. I see no problem.
@@stanislavkimov2779days gone is kinda butt
Tbf Days Gone released on pc, so it might not've sold better solely on playstation, who knows
In a pre-Elden Ring world, Sony not continuing Bloodborne makes sense. But as soon as Elden Ring set the gaming world on fire, Sony should have greenlit a Bloodborne remaster, remake, or sequel. Of course, a sequel without Fromsoft would be dumb.
Without Miyazaki even. Bloodborne is Miyazaki.
Bottom-line Sony is fucking stupid. Killing Days Gone 2 was also a mistake. How they managed to beat XBOX is beyond me
Because XBox just throws money at things and fails to understanding gaming. that's always been their issue. Sony has always been good at garnering studios.
Because Micro-fucking-soft is more stupid, it’s that simple.
Hardly anyone cares about Xbox games, which is why Microsoft is buying popular established games CoD, Minecraft, Overwatch, Elder Scrolls, Fallout, Doom etc.
@@nicekix3038 It wasn't a defense of XBOX. Im saying they've made bad decision after bad decision so much so its amazing they beat anyone. Even XBOX
Because XBox has no strategy beyond buying studios to make up for the fact they are not a gaming company or gaming centric. They inserted themselves in the market for the profit and got lucky with Halo, but it couldn't last without key people behind it. Sony understands gaming, but they saw the greed and practices of Microsoft and followed suit. Corporatization destroys anything if it goes unchecked, especially in a creative field.
I liked Days Gone 2 too, but it was again, another 3rd person game using the same formula for their single-player AAA games. The fact they can sell so much with key IP is what keeps them alive, because once they cut out so many Japanese studios by censorship nor the advertising they used to. It's Western and limited to that approach, but that's all Microsoft is, too, but worse.
Sony is just plain stupid. The PS2 is one of if not the greatest consoles of all time. I think that was the beginning of the end for them. They made decisions as if they would always be on top and nothing could knock them down.
I think it was the PS3. It had so much soul behind it, which got beat by the corporate Xbox 360. So, Sony started to pivot to be more corporate in their running of PS
I thing ps3 was great too
@@SpriteYagamitbf from what I’ve read, the PS3 actually sold more than the 360 in the end, so Xbox didn’t really beat them.
@@SpriteYagamiSony was always corporate. You're just naive.
Disagree, I think Sony has a similar habit to Nintendo, where if they're successful they reveal their true colors, but when they're hurting a bit they're pro consumer.
With Nintendo the obvious examples are the SNES being successful, Gamecube selling poorly, Wii being successful, WiiU failing completely, Switch being successful.
Each success they turn into corporate monsters, and each failure forces them to play nice.
With Sony it's less obvious, but you can see it after their success with the PS2 when they had the balls to release the PS3 for the price they did, and assumed people would give them money because "Playstation". When they realized the 360 was stomping them, that's when they tried to turn things around, focusing on excellent exclusives and the like and lowering the price of future PS3 models dramatically, and by the end of the generation some reports even say that the PS3 beat out the 360.
They kept the momentum going a bit with the PS4, focusing on great exclusives, but you could see the cracks. Charging for multiplayer, focusing on unneeded remasters, nothing major but even so. When the PS4 curbstomped the One, that was the final nail in the coffin, and with the PS5 they revealed their true colors, thinking that they could get away with whatever they wanted. Maybe if the Pro fails, and this generation as a whole doesn't go well, it'll set them straight, but who knows.
Bloodborne has much more potential than it appears particularly on PC not on consoles.
This comes down to the sales of Elden Ring not Bloodborne.
If Bloodborne launched on PC all the Elden Ring fanbase would be fixed on the Bloodborne launch on PC.
Alongside all the mod options from the already heavily active soulsborne modding.
And the people are hungry for bloodborne
Mods for some BB weapons, estethic mods for ER inspired by BB like Graceborne
$400m lost on Concord while Bloodborne would have literally printed money. Let that sink in.
Fans: Sony tens of thousands of fans are willing to pay full price for this game. Please make a remaster!
Sony: Concord
They would rather pay for concord than remake bloodborne. Remember that
Bloodborne on PC would be the most hacked & modded game out there!😊
I'm convinced there will never be a bloodborne 2. Sony owns the IP and Fromsoftware not falling for the okie doke from Sony. I don't see From wasting their time on a BB sequel when they can make a mult-plat and maximize profits. Especially when Sony won't even take the time to fix the frame for the PS5. They could care less about that game.
I could see FromSoft buying the Bloodborne IP from Sony in a distant future
they would easily regain all the money they lost on Concord within the first 3 months of PC sales. The issue is that their sales team consist of old farts.
Something to mention is that bloodborne did not have the budget that the last of us pt 2 or spider man had , so 7 million copies is a very good number relative to that .
Also a bloodborne remaster ( unlike a remake ) wouldn't cost a lot of money and as it exists in a post elden ring world , it is almost guaranteed to sell well .
Now you're right that sony would prioritize a game like horizon , tlou or god of war as they sold more and appeal to a wider audience of audience, but i don't get sony complaining about not having enough original IPs then having popular ones that they do nothing with
With the shitty state of how games are these days bloodborne is most likely to succeed. It's been demonstrated multiple times that the "Modern Audience" aren't paying for games targeted to them because they're no real gamers, they're activists.
But a BB remaster wouldn't "force our behaviors"... 🙄🤦♂️
@@alessandrobaggi6129 Who said anything about forcing a behavior? This is supply and demand and money speaks louder than activists.
@@edgarava1One of those activists believes in "Force behaviors." Way more than what makes money.
But you forgot something , days gone sold fewer copies than Bloodborn and it was released on PC 🤷🏻♂️
Sony first party studio...maybe?
In my opinion Sony are idiots to not had made a Remake for Bloodborne for console and PC by now while focusing on other big titles that take 8yrs. They literally see the audience that have been crying for years for this. I think it would sell more than it ever has if it’s remade now because I’m sorry a remaster isn’t enough at this point in my opinion.
You do realise FromSoft have been making other stuff. They won't stop making games, Bloodborne 2 might have meant no Sekiro or no Elden Ring. I wouldn't even stress, FromSoft are independent from Sony, they can make games very similar to Bloodborne if they wanted to cash in on it without it being Bloodborne itself.
It doesnt look dated enough for a remake. A remaster on the other hand would of been good and also released on PC which is what alot of people have been asking for.
The issue is Sony doesn't want to invest as much as they need to keep it exclusive. They can pay a support studio for a remaster or a remake, knowing the latter is more expensive. However, that isn't the same as being developed by FromSoftware.
It's Sony's IP so they want to keep it exclusive to PS, which is fine, but it may not reach expected returns. It would be smart to release it on PC day & date, but they know it will take away from their PS5 hardware & software sales.
A remake? No one wants a remake, but a remaster by From Software.
@@upon-fe2720 I didn’t say they had to make a part 2 I said it’s been long enough that it should get a remake instead of a remaster now and Miyazaki himself said he’s definitely not against not against returning to the BloodBorne franchise. Sony are the idiots that never pitch the idea because they’re so out of touch with their fanbase and don’t care. They’ve returned to their PS3 era of cockiness and it’s biting them in the ass and rightfully so.
Demon's Souls sold only 1.7M but still got a (shitty) remake, so stop making up bs about sales numbers. The games that sould 20M were instantly forgotten, nobody wants or cares about them getting a sequel. People just want a BB port, which is much cheaper than a full (shitty) remake by Bluepoint.
For sure
its good , stop hating. just get a ps4 if you want bloodborne that bad
All we want is a 60fps bloodborne and they could do that if they wanted!!
@@salstep Bloodborne runs at 30fps on the PS4. Sony won't even release a patch to improve performance on PS5 despite the fact that fans literally made one and put it on the the internet for hacked ps5s. Also demons souls remake sucks. It alters character designs and bastardizes the world building because bluepoint doesn't understand how environmental storytelling works.
@@Patrick-bn5rp 1. 30 fps is playable. 2. just cause Bluepoint doesn't do exactly what your lord and Saviour Miyazaki does doesn't make the game bad. you guys are everything that's wrong with the soul's community. if it's fun, it's fun.
The best thing from software can do is a spiritual successor if they even want to develop it.
Great game but I'd argue that it didn't sell well when it needed to, sure it did sell well as cult hit down the line but Sony and any other Publisher want's those sales much sooner a year at the latest.
@@stevenbishop1782 It’s a PS4 exclusive. If it released on PC like other former PlayStation exclusives it would sell gangbusters.
Sony is so invested into becoming a monopoly that they fail to grasp what gamers actually want. Concord was proof of that.
*Xbox. Fixed your comment
Good video and I think you very close to the core of the Bloodborne issue. A big thing that people rarely bring up is Sony PlayStation's move to California, change in leadership and focus. This new crew, worse than the old crew, see stuff like Bloodborne as old Sony, Studio Japan related, so modern Sony wants little to do with that.
This whole thing about Sony and sales has always been a mystery to me. Days Gone is sitting at around 10 million sold and they tell us that's a failure. The Last of Us Part II has sold around 10 million with easily 3 times the budget, but that is a hit game somehow. Days Gone has made Sony way more money from game sales than The Last of Us Part II. They have just taken a $200+ million loss on Concord plus what they spent buying Firewalk, they are about to lose money on Fairgame$, Marathon is not coming out for years now, if at all, Bungie is falling apart so that was a waste of $3.6 billion and who knows what they have been paying for Final Fantasy and all their other money hatting ventures. Most of this is nonsense, egos and company politics sadly. The GaaS push is a failure and a very costly one. Maybe they will find success at some point, but the cancelled The Last of Us multiplayer game was their best bet short term.
I don't know if you meant to do it, but you seem to be using casual games to mean higher sales. FromSoftware's Souls games have created a whole genre with very large and growing fanbase, with the latest games selling by far the most. Elden Ring shows just how big this audience actually is, even though Elden Rings appeal is multifaceted; Open world helps, George RR Martin's name helped and the hype helped.
Bloodborne is probably a complicated case. It has sold very well, something like 8 million copy or so, just from PS4 and a bit of PS5 users. Sony owns the IP, but the tech i.e. engine is 100% FromSoftware. I think you're correct in assuming that FromSoftware are too busy doing other projects to make a Bloodborne 2, but I could see them doing a slight remaster for the 10th anniversary coming up next year. Souls games easily sell the most on PC and the one Sony game port people want, including myself is Bloodborne Remastered (not a sterile remake).
You're thinking of Jim Ryan, he's gone.
Also - paragraphs.
@@upon-fe2720 Don't tell me what I'm thinking of. I don't hold a single old fool like Jim Ryan responsible for turning Sony PlayStation into a failure factory. They fired loyal old Jimmy into the sun in a real hurry, with corporate speak for "he lives on a farm now". Him being gone fixes nothing for SIE. Where his head was, two or three more have spawned.
These days Indie games are vastly more respected than most triple A games lol
Hollow Knight, Cuphead, enter the Gungeon, and other games come to mind
7 mil copies sold should be enough to address or improve from the feedback with a sequel. I understand not making a sequel for less than 1mil copied sold. Otherwise, they end up burying good ip they can improve upon to end up complaining that they don't have enough of ip.
The thing is, Soulslike were not as popular when Bloodborne was launched, Sony need to see the success of Dark Souls 3 and Elden Ring. Bloodborne is a highly requested game by both PS owners and PC players, the game can easily sell 15 million copies now days.
Sony ports Sackboy and Rachet and Clank to PC, games that nobody asked for and yet they choose to ignore how bad people want to play a remaster of Bloodborne.
As an alternative, From Software can make a “Spiritual Successor”. That is a way to get around the Sony issue . It won’t be 1 for 1 but it could get close.
The only explanation that makes sense to me is that they’re trying to keep Fromsoftware exclusives only on PS to draw in that base. Because we’re extremely dedicated.
As for a remaster not happening - absolutely no idea
It’s more about Sony wanting to risk it. Miyazaki has expressed multiple times that his favourite game is Bloodborne and wouldn’t mind a sequel
it costs nothing to cap the game at 60fps and make the graphics better. Someone has already done it, and he does not have millions in the bank to spend on its creation... its just a free cash button Sony is afraid to talk about for literally no reason
Nahhh 150m on concord was the play... The modern audience doesn't want bloodborne... we want dustborn and concord
Clearly underestimating the sheer size of from soft fans
@cooperclark6885 the fanbase for concord was way higher... but the haters spread lies about ugly characters and got it canceled
Some Dev said that it was more like 400m without the acquisition cost
Concord make sony gain a 1000M Concordollars
@@Fidel_casserole97 omg I actually found the first person ever trying to defend those pieces of shit 😂
One correct I would make is that you said Bloodborne sold about 7.5mil copies on an install base of about 100mil, but the install base of the PS4 was nowhere near 100mil in 2015.
Bloodborne was arguably the first big name PS4 exclusive that really drove console sales, no one even talks about earlier exclusives like Killzone Shadowfall or Infamous Second Son.
Even if bloodborne got into pc, I'll never give sony money ever again or more like I can't because psn isn't available in my country
No ghost of tsushima and no helldivers for me, I'll never buy a sony game even if I have the option
Your loss.
@@based-ys9um sure, my loss, since I can't legally purchase it in the first place, yes my loss
Move to another country?
They are not hiding, they are keeping it for a remake/remaster for PS6 launch
7:30 It seems like Sony has the goal of get people to buy the console, which will keep them no matter how long the games take to release. The 3rd party games allow for the filler. Also, studios seem to be favoring ps5 development, which causes more support for Sony (Baldurs gate)
The more people ask for it, the less it’s going to happen
From what I could find it looks like Demon's Souls on the PS3 sold just under 2 million copies and got a remake, so 7 million copies should be more than enough for something.
Until Dawn only sold 4 million and is getting a remake, what the hell are Sony doing?
Also a little perspective Spiderman 2 sold 10 million copies bringing in $700,000,000 and took $300,000,000 and 5 years to make. Xbox bring in $8,400,000,000 a year from gamepass
Production cost is something I should’ve factored in. It costs more to make a game externally as such.
7M after deep discounts is not going to excite them... It's just salvaging at some point. No different than when I saw Outer Worlds on sale for 2.99, then they hyped 5M sales the next week.
After you nearly give the game away you look at engagement... Did they buy it because it was a good deal, or did they interact with it? Sometimes sales are mostly good for marketing, they had no interest in funding a sequel so they never advertised it
Even more puzzling, thanks to elden ring, its not as if FromSoft is an unknown company any longer either.
There is so much interest in this game right now.
I only got into the souls series last year, quickly beat and did multiple play throughs of DS1, promptly quit DS2 after about 70 hours of raging (then came back recently to finally beat it), have only 1 play through of DS3 but plan to do a few NG+ runs in the near future, beat ER a METRIC FUCK TON OF TIMES.
Lies of P, Lords of the Fallen, Sekiro are all on my near future to plays, that and demon souls if it ever gets a PC release (mostly because fuck sony)
I don’t understand so many things about this Bloodborne discussion. All the souls game were very niche at the beginning but have now become so popular and we literally have Elden Ring to show for it. While the beginning was tough now everybody wants more. Bloodborne has attracted so much mysticism Bloodborne would sell more than Elden Ring. That is why you and a lot of youtubers even talk about it, people will see bloodborne and will immediately click let alone buy. If someone wants to objectify how much Bloodborne would sell you only need to think it would sell as much as Elden Ring.
Sony now is a Concord
Man what did you smoke?
This explains the lack of a follow-up but not the lack of a PC port. They ported games that did way worse on console like Sackboy, which is also the type of game that would do (and did) even worse on Steam where Bloodborne would shine.
but at the same time the popularity of souls like games has risen since elden ring which made the whole series blow up even more
they have no trouble remaking last of us many times.
A Bloodborne remaster, PC port or even a sequel from a financial perspective I think is an absolute no-brainer. BB has reached real cult status in the target audience, From Software now has a huge reputation in mainstream gaming, there's no newly announced Soulslike from them so a BB project would be a huge HUGE deal. And considering the current narrative around Sony and PS5s exclusives line-up, even just a BB remaster would be a win. The reason why we've not gotten a BB remaster I believe are to do with BB being on old SDK that makes updating it a not insignificant technical challenge, From Software having been too busy with Elden Ring and Armored Core until recently and Bluepoint (the natural studio to handle such a project if not FS) being too busy working on their own IP for the first time. Apart from that I guess the focus on live service could have blinded Sony to the opportunity of revisiting BB.
They ignore it because it is an actual game and doesn't take 15 minutes away from you to play itself
The pc emulation as well as the Graceborne mod for Elden Ring are enough to keep players still invested in the game. Media as a form of entertainment shouldn't be hard to access, in other words, if Sony doesn't want to do anything with Bloodborne, then the fans should be allowed to.
Looking at that sales data, it almost looks like games that play like movies instead of video games are outselling actual video games. How many copies of Final Fantasy VII sold back in 1997?
Simple, the game is good, contains no DEI elements and they cannot be added before a re-release, they did not work on it. In fact, they HATE Bloodborne being their console-buying game, free from DEI bullshit and not made by themselves.Anyway, we may have it on PC before next Halloween
Go outside.
If we get #old yarnham hunters are non-binary trending, maybe they'll give us the pc port 😂
Touch grass.
@@avidfather1864 after you
@@chaolihai-innit he said nothing wrong
Can’t believe I still have my copy of BB from 2015
By your logic, there wouldn't be trillion ratchet and clank games + a remaster + modern release.
I have to ask, but does the Demon Souls remake not call a lot of this into question? Sony had it remade as an exclusive, knowing that it wasn't for casuals, and I'm sure they weren't expecting Spider-man of GoW sales from it. Yet they remade it nonetheless. So, to me, that says that Sony isn't as hung up on those points as this video assumes.
And while yeah, ultimately it's one game, it's still a recent release, showing Sony's current mindset, and is still one of the only exclusives for the PS5. So I think it's important to consider.
This still does not explain why Bloodborne has never gotten any type of update whatsoever. Sekiro, Dark Souls III, and Elden Ring have all gotten updates to run at 60fps on PS5 hardware, but all those games are owned by FromSoftware, and we've seen proof from modders, and emulation that there is nothing wrong with the game logic if Bloodborne runs at 60fps too, but Sony hasn't even given us that for no reason.
Meanwhile a game like Days Gone which had similar success to Bloodborne got higher resolution/higher frame rate patch made in-house for PS5 AND even a native PC port... something nobody asked for; on the other hand everybody is asking for a Bloodborne port and Sony knows for a fact that people want Bloodborne yet we got nothing since the DLC for that game released. I understand why we haven't gotten a sequel, a remaster or a remake of Bloodborne, and I honestly I don't want any of those if it's not made by FromSoftware themselves, but not making a PC port and at the very least a 60fps patch for PS5 makes no sense.
If Bloodborne is too niche, then I have trouble understanding why Ghost of Tsushima got a PC port since it sold 9.73 million copies before being released on PC. That figure is really close to Bloodborne's 7.5 million copies
$5-10m for a remake that would sell probably 15,000,000 copies? Come on PayStation
The hype for Souls games is way bigger now after Elden Ring. But most aren't willing to buy a Playstation just for one game. There would be so many people who would buy it on PC.
Sony is right, no one wants Bloodborne 2 (specially after Elden Ring) and i agree with it, thats why they poured 400+ million into Concord, a game no one asked for or wanted 😂
Really great video and work. A bit of a challenge is that R&C got Rift Apart after selling less. And Days Gone got ditched also due to fall out w Director and egg on the face from bad reviews
Bloodborne is in a weird place.
Sony isn't the type of company to send C&D letters to emulator devs.
Sony is greedy, but only so far as it really shakes their bottom line.
So Bloodborne falls into the category of "We care, but we don't... care." for Sony.
Well your info is wrong on Days gone. Sony didnt cancel the sequel, it was reported that the developer themselves canceled the sequel, the director was just salty.
Dang.
I've seen 100+ new videos on bloodborne in just this month.
Elden Ring not only had it's own sales but increased the sales of all souls games.
They are irrationally dumping money in the fire every day they don't do something, anything, with bloodborne.
It's no longer a niche title, it's The Mainstream.
They either have plans for it soon or they’ll never do anything with this game ever
A remastered version with a PC port would sell twice as much
good take on the whole thing. true, "data" and sales drives these corporate decisions but don't mean a bb remake is not possible, they did it with des. $ony knows there's a lot of interest in this ip and if they feel like wasting $400m on a game no one asked for is a bad idea and spending a faction of that on a game that guarantees sales, they might reconsider. i'm personally more interested in "chadps4" that will preserve the original more so than a remake and is looking more promising than $ony's efforts.
guess what, looks like days gone might get a remaster too 💀
If we look at purely the numbers, it'll never make sense to re-release and/or Globalize Bloodborne
but I bet everyone has got a few damn good reasons as to why it definitely would.
They might have thought Bloodborne was niche a while ago, but Elden Ring has completely changed the game. So many people are hooked on souls-likes because of this and would buy the game. I guarantee it would sell more now than its 2015 release.
1:15 Tbh I find it very hard to believe that BB only had 7.46 million. I would believe more like double that. I honestly had a conspiracy theory about the lack of update for BB or remake. Sony tried to fully acquire FS but was only able to get 25% so I think BB was purposely ignored as an f you to the fans bc of the lack of acquisition. Perhaps a dumb theory but I don't believe for a second that BB would not have yielded a higher revenue take over a remake of Demons Soul's. Tbh I don't want a remake just a 60 fps update but screw Sony, ShadPS4 is nearly done.
Bloodborne also doesn't fit into the woke agenda being pushed in all these other titles including the sequel to GoW w/ that Sweet Baby Inc crap.
@heyguyslolGAMING THIS! People are too dismissive about these "tactics": we've seen time and time again companies do these type of things for ESG/DEI money, why wouldn't they double, or even triple, down?
I think the Elden Ring effect now changes all that data you've shown. Elden Ring has brought in so many new customers such as myself. I'd always stayed away from these games believing them too difficult. Gone back and finished every fromsoft
game since beating Elden Ring.
"I never supported from software till grrm was involved and it's open world" you 😂
Sony didn’t cancel Days Gone II. It was Bend’s corporate suits who denied a sequel and didn’t bring it up to PS Studios head. Days Gone director said it himself.
Your argument misses the point that Ratchet & Clank (2016) sold less than BloodBorne in the same time period but we got sequels for it anyway.
Day's Gone got a PS5 patch but still sold less than BloodBorne without one.
Also Demon's Souls Remake was greenlit with even less sales on PS3, and let's not forget the Concord disaster which automatically destroys Sony's decision making potential.
Past sales in this case would mean nothing, specially if they release it on PC as well.
When you distill it down, PlayStation wouldn’t do it without it being exclusive.
Fromsoftware needs it to be exclusive for the benefit of their brand.
Remember that Spiderman, God of war, Uncharted and Horizon were all bundled with the PS4/5 they would never sell as much as the real games like Bloodborne or GT7 or Tsushima on it's own.
A PC port or remaster on Steam would easily sell another 5+ M copies without much effort or investment.
Sony just lost 400 million on Concord.
People are asking for a Bloodborne 2 or a Bloodborne 4k 60fps remaster for many years.
They could make millions with it.
But listening to your customers is not done anno 2024 it seems...
They need to remake Bloodborne! Elden Ring got tons of new people into the souls genre & I'm sure a new Bloodborne would sell like crazy
bloodborne "failed" because it was a genre catered to a small portion of gamers, who an even smaller amount have access to a ps4.
is sony puts Bloodborne on PC, they'd be looking at an UNBELIEVEABLE amount of money.
if they release even the smallest trailer confirming a bloodborne remake is in the works, there'd be so much hype around it, it would take the internet by storm for weeks
I guarantee it.
and now after the release of Elden Ring, more people have gotten a taste of souls-likes, and now attention towards souls-likes are at an all time high
I don't agree with you, When bloodborne was released the popularity of souls like games were no where near as high as they are now. Just look at Elden Ring with over 25 million copies sold. One of the highest selling games of all time. Why? Because it's now a popular genre and the best time to release another Bloodborne game is now.
I literally been playing bloodborne again for like 3 months, replaying, doing 100% and more. Guess sony does not want money lmfao
So pretty much they can, they just don’t want too
They were busy making "hits" like Concord.
200m on concord or 100m for bloodborne 2? I think sony made the right choice 😂😂
That's okay. The community is doing it ourselves.
Sony doesn't give a damn about us fans
Sony Japan needs to get PlayStation headquarters the fuck out of California.
Calling it, BluePoint Bloodborne Remake PS6 exclusive launch title
They lost the source code, that's why they haven't done anything
Can we assume that the top 5 selling games came with sold units of PS4? I remember seeing millions of units back in 2018 where they were selling PS4s with games like horizon and uncharted
Kai Cenat didnt do it any favours
So the moral of this story is that bad games sell more copy's to normies and good games sell less.
miyasaki deberia comprar la ip y hacer un port para las consolas modernas y pc, recuperaria la inversion y tendria ganancias en 1 año, hasta podriamos tener una secuela
Mate, Sony may own the rights to the Bloodborne IP but you shouldn't imply that ANY of the current Sony studios can actually make a Soulslike game as good as FromSoftware. That's exactly why they only have games from this genre by other studios.
Don't make me laugh, since Sony clearly declared where the development priorities for their studios lie when producing games and being able to create a Soulslike among those studios is not even on the table for them.