This is exactly what a chemistry lesson should be like. Expensive software, devices, or fancy animations are not important. At the end of the day, how simple and easy-to-understand a lesson is are the determining factors of the lesson's quality, and the creator of this lesson did a great job with that.
Please let you suppose that animated lessons are for the sake of simplicity, because animated images are likely to be copied in a mind and so be easy to memorise and visualize, thank you so much
@Sofia Ramos-Hidalgo stoichiometry can be a pain in the butt, but it's just like everything, the more you practice the better you get at it. It's merely converting a unit into a different unit. It does get easier and don't stress yourself out. Take breaks when studying when you feel you hit a wall. When you come back it's almost as if you have a different outlook. Hope everything goes well for you.
Hi and thanks. While I should perhaps not get overly involved with your comment, as a teacher I have to speak up. Academics with no classroom experience and poor experimental design (if any), and the teachers who (mis)interpret their work, did and do the world a great disservice by introducing the concept of assigning different learning modalities according to sense (visual learner, tactile learner, etc.). I do not deny that people are often more comfortable with one modality versus another, or prefer one modality over another, but to be told by their teachers that they have one dominant learning modality is a sad misunderstanding of cognitive development, the learning process, psychology, and the strong influence that teachers have with their students. We need to be telling students that all learning modalities are important (they are), and that even though they may prefer one over another, or have been TOLD (by teachers!) that they learn better in one modality over another, the fact is we are telling this to people with enormously plastic brains, and what they need to understand is that they can LEARN to improve their learning in other modalities, and should in fact work at doing so, so that when their brains develop into adult brains, they can be adults that have a much greater capacity to learn in all modalities, which is so important in our very complex world. If you can learn in all modalities, then you can think in all modalities, and then you can make much deeper connections between all sorts of topics, and that makes you a far better thinker. And guess what? Adults have plastic brains too. They can learn to learn in all modalities. It is worth the effort!!! Hope I didn't get too high on the soapbox! Thanks for "listening."
@@CrashChemistryAcademy I really appreciate this comment. As an older student, I can feel my physiology's resistance to thinking in these unfamiliar ways which is both alarming and invigorating. In running into these resistances, I get an experiential sense of broadening my mental horizons. It's a profoundly humbling experience and I appreciate your dedication to encouraging others to walk the path. I need all the encouragement I can get because it is so much easier to not try. Cheers, sir.
Wow out of so many other videos about orbitals, yours was the most clearest to me! I don't know if its just because I'm a visual learner, but whatever it is, your explanation is the clearest! Keep up the great work :)
This video along with couple of videos cleared up entirely. I began wondering and confusing myslef. I want able to imagine. Because anything to make sense u need to imagine it. And this video helped me get that .
Thanks a lot for this! It's worth it to clarify that, even though the whole “s for sphere and p for polar” thing is good for remembering as a mnemonic, for example, that's NOT actually what the letters stand for. The shell or orbital s stands for *sharp*, p stands for *principal*, d stands for *diffuse*, and f stands for *fundamental*. And the reason early spectroscopists gave them those letters is the way the “spectral lines” produced from spectroscopy looked like in each case; s's lines were “sharp”, p's lines were the strongest (“principal”), d's lines were “diffuse” (scattered or perhaps fuzzy in contrast with s's sharpness), and f's lines’ frequency ratios were similar to that of Hydrogen's so seemed to them...“fundamental”. This may not help as much as the mnemonics for early students, but it will certainly help if a student likes chemistry or chooses a career in it; you don't want to sound misinformed or ignorant of those facts when talking to other chemists.
The quantum number 'spin' is why each orbital lobe when filled, only has two electrons, one spin up, the other spin down. It is absolutely forbidden for an atom to contain two electrons with same quantum numbers, hence spin up or spin down, though electrons do not appear to spin. Quantum stuff blew my mind.
The more complexly shaped the orbital (say d vs s), the more energy required (angular momentum) for an electron to remain in that area. It takes more energy for an electron to be in a d shape than in an s shape, thus 3d electrons have slightly higher energy than 4s.
@@CrashChemistryAcademy I went there but no email. If you don't mind could I ask of it from you here in the public thread? If not we will find another compromise
That's not true. The energy depends only on the principal quantum number n, your 3 or 4 in this case, as long as you have a single electron and you use non-relativistic quantum mechanics. The splitting of the energy levels is mostly due to the interaction of several electrons with each other, and there are also small corrections due to relativistic effects and the magnetic field of the nucleus.
I was having a hard time trying to visualize how orbitals overlap each other with different shapes and energy levels but this vid made it as clear as glass thankkk u genius
This is the best explanation I've found. It's a very simple concept when addressed properly. I don't know why no one else thought to clearly match the shape to the letter and draw it on an axes to clearly give us a picture. Those who explain it the best understand it the best. I will be flicking through your videos when I have grasped this :) Thank you SO much!
I was confused on orbitals for about a year and a half. My Honors Chemistry class didn't go into depth about them, and now that I'm in AP, we're expected to know them. Thank you for this video. I finally have an inkling of what they are.
Dude, you win! I've been trying to get a handle on this whole electron orbital setup (just for my own entertainment, cuz I'm a nerd and I'm into these things) and no other videos (even the really popular ones, like Bozeman science and Crash Course) explained it as well as you. Thanks!
I hope this question makes sense, but for the sake of pursuing higher learning would someone care to try and explain why there is a higher probability of finding an electron within _those_ specific shapes? Does it have to do with the way electrons repel each other? Even if someone could link me to an article or something I would be very appreciative!
The behavior of electrons in an atom is described mathematically by the Schrodinger Equation (1926) which is called the quantum mechanical model, and which is still used for the basis of quantum mechanics today with some modifications. The equation has four variables that describe electron behavior, and the values allowed for those variables are called quantum numbers. When plugging in the allowed quantum numbers, the orbitals emerge. The probability aspect comes from the Schrodinger Equation defining the electron as a wave as the basis for the math, and the wave came from Louis de Broglie describing the basis for the quantization of electrons as a wave phenomenon (1924) which was interpreted by Max Born (1924) to be referring to the electron's probability of existing in any particular location. In Schrodinger's equation, the letter psi represents the electron wave, and psi^2 represents the probability of where the electron might be at a given moment within an orbital, but the entire orbital can only be represented as a space in which there is a certain probability of finding an electron, the 90% used in the video. The "certain probability" is necessary, because at 100% probability, the orbital balloons to take up the entire universe: there is a 100% probability of finding the electron somewhere in the universe. If the probability is shrunk down to 90%, then the math is able to describe a space, the orbitals, that are reasonably small enough to define the size of an atom. You may want to view my video about de Broglie's wave interpretation here: th-cam.com/video/oLd-6UytkIU/w-d-xo.html.
@@CrashChemistryAcademy That was such an interesting and complete response, thank you so much! I have never heard the "100% probability" explained like that before. I will watch the video you linked and I truly appreciate the thoroughness of your reply!
@Proh Done Yes, any neutral atom has the same number of protons and electrons. If the number of electrons was different (an ion) its properties would be very different than the neutral atom.
To Aptua: I think the same way! If you look at the orbitals as described in this very good video, it does make you wonder why the electrons "choose" those configurations in particular. And yes - the math points to those shapes. But again, why? There are several things to consider. The electrons, being all negatively (and equally) charged, do repel each other. But at the same time, they're attracted to the protons in the nucleus. Also, there's the strong nuclear force to contend with. I don't have the math for any of this, understand, I just try to grasp things conceptually, forming ideas and pictures in my head. Notice one key thing, though: the shapes of the (90% probability!) orbitals are a bit like flattened tear drops. The largest area is farther away from the nucleus - and from the other electron. So, in a sense, you could picture (very crudely, of course) the idea that the electrons, though attracted to the nucleus, must avoid getting too close to each other. The 'balance' if you will, is a sort of compromise between forces. Again, that's really crude, but a workable mental picture. We certainly progressed a great deal over the old models! At first, we thought (or rather, assumed) that electrons would orbit the nucleus like planets orbit the sun. Then we developed the "cloud" model, where they were just smeared out around the nucleus in no particular order. Now, we have a much better idea (and handy computer visuals) of the actual shapes. I hope this helps some, without being too crude or off-kilter. tavi.
THANK YOU SOOOOO MUCH for making this tutorial. I was stuck for a week on this topic of orbitals until my friend recommended this video to my group. It is so clear cut and manageable in terms of understanding. Thank you so so much. :DD
This actually saved me. I was in tears because I didn't understand anything from the material my school gave me, and this helped me understand a lot. Thank you!
The best explanation of orbitals. the sentence ( the shape is the probability of the position of the electrons, not the path) explained confusion for two semesters trying to grasp what these shapes are. Thank you so much!
OMG OMG!! Ive been trying to understand the image of electron configuration and orbitals in my head but I couldn't because my professor wasn't able to help me nor any of the tutors I hired. After looking through numerous videos I finally understand orbitals. THANK YOU SOOOO MUCH!!!
Myfavsandlikes I hate khan academy. Tyler Dewitt is the best chemistry you tuber and the only one who knows how to explain topics, unlike sal who loves to make topics sound as over-detailed and complicated as possible.
I've been trying to understand this topic for over 2 years. (I actually learned it 2 years ago, didn't understand it, and now have to learn it again) and I FINALLY UNDERSTAND. Thanks for being everything that my chemistry teacher should have been!!!!!
dude i have taken college chemistry 1 and 2 and organic 1 and am now in organic 2 and i've struggled with understanding orbitals the whole time. I'm just now actually understanding the concept thanks to your video. Awesome job at explaining while keeping in mind that people watching this probably reeeaaaally just want to be explained in detail but without confusing words and other harder concepts thrown in.
after checking 100's of youtube videos, i must say you are indeed the master of explaining things. your knowledge is concise and easy to understand and thorough. only video i have seen that actually shows and explains how each orbital overlaps and is arranged around the nucleus ! PLEASE LOAD MORE VIDEOS....!
Thank you for this video! I'm getting back into Chemistry after 10 years, to further my career in the medical field. and quantum mechanical model was something I don't think I ever quite understood. I've watched a few videos, including Crash Course (I love the series. It's entertaining, but their orbital video didn't help me much). Your video broke it down and clarified the points I wasn't understanding. Thank you so much, and we'll done!
I am glad to realize that my intelligence was not the reason why I could not understand this. Thank you very much for giving me faith in the fact that teaching can be good.
I cannot believe that this video is 9 years old but explains this in the best way possible, i really needed a visual representation and here i have it. Broken down so well thank you.
You are fantastic and i wish i had a professor like you. Your videos may be saving me from failing my chem class in which I have the worst professor on earth. He complicated every single concept while you make it sound so easy. You da bomb.com
The best explanation combined with great visuals. and also explaing the overlapping and if I understand correctly the outer electrons can trespass into the lower energy level orbitals.I also like the clarity of naration. Thanks a heap.
Was so great,particularly about the visual representation . All I needed was an imagery of things snd this video perfectly meets what I need. Please do make such a helpful video for band gaps
Yes. The thing I needed was imagination. Simply telling that electrons move in orbitals and stuff wont reach the mind. Because u cant imagine that. This video helped me too.
awesome... i am glad glad i found this just in time since i am taking my as level exams soon. Thanks a lots , keep making more videos , you really are a great teacher why ? simply because you teach with no ambiguity, leaving us students with no questions but understanding.
FINALLY. Ive been looking for an actual description of an orbital itself and this is the only place that doesent just describe the quantum numbers, THANK YOU
Wow, thank you so much! My high school teacher is really bad at teaching and he always makes us do assignments all the time even though we don't really know how to. Our text book isn't very clear either. You explain everything carefully and visually so I bet anyone could learn from your videos! Cheers, REALLY good job!!
I love the way of your presentation and looking forward to see more of this topics in the near future. Chemistry is my favourite subject and your explanation tremendously inspired me. I really appreciate your video clip and enjoyed learning from it. Thank you very much for making this video and for your generous heart of sharing your invaluable knowledge of Chemistry concepts.
Like the way you explained it all, most of the videos on TH-cam seem to me to be people trying to set a new speed record for fastest video. The presentation was great - thanks a lot
This was so much more helpful than the crash course. This gave me all the information I needed without giving me so much extra detail that I got confused.
Thanks a lot! I am from Germany and this video was a recommendation. But I immediately understood the topic with the video. You are much better than our teacher.
One of the best explanations out there, understanding that these shapes are areas where there's high probability for electrons to be is exactly the part I was missing, just changing "orbitals" to "areas" or some other word would have made it much less confusing, but I get the historical reasons (bohr model) thanks for the video!
Thank you so much for the video , I finally got to understand this. But what is the relation between the wave function psi and the different orbitals ?
wow !! ... Fantastic...Excellent explanation... Now I got it... It directly gone in to my head without raising any doubt. No other explanation satisfied me and thus I was searching in the internet till I got yours. Once again, thank you.
My favorite part of your video is the diagram of the p orbitals. Most diagrams make it look like these orbitals are connected in the center. I couldn't understand how they could work based on those images. Electrons cannot pass through the nucleus, right? That tiny bit of space surrounding the nucleus (in your diagram) brought it all together for me. Thanks, Mr. Zappa, sir
I've been researching my family tree and have discovered that I actually am Steven Segal. It was quite a shock, but the wealth and fame have cushioned the blow.
I recommend watching the crash course video about electrons and then watching this video because he does mention some things that he doesn't explain in the video, but they do in crash course. I finally understand now after the two videos
HAHA! You're so right! The only reason I watched Crash Course Chemistry is because his personality Is so addictive! >.< He doesn't explain it that great, but it's so fun to watch! X'D
I juts want to say....WOW. WOW. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I love chemistry and somehow the concept of orbitals was one of the things that just refused to be admitted into my brain and your video really cleared it up. THANK YOUUUUUU!!!!
@@kriyaramjuttan9499 actually in 2d we have x and y lengths. And if we add it height to these lengths it will be in 3d. So if you think that you are looking from the positive side of z axis, you can see the x and y axises. I think that is the point. :)
Thank you for taking the time to make this video. I'm a visual learner and my professor was explaining it verbally which at the time made no sense to me. Now I understand it.
Is it possibly easy to explain why dumb-bell orbitals have such an unusual shape? Same for doughnut shape, please. What is the root cause which influences the shape of orbitals?
Rick Deckard That's obvious, it doesn't need mentioning. What are the principal influences, in short, on which these equations are based? What two or three influences are in balance with each other?
Thank You!!! spent almost two hours flipping from my orgo textbook to my chemistry textbook and other youtube videos and this video is the only one that made sense to me. Awesome!!
After searching and watching lot of videos on this topic for two days I found this simple & easy to understand video.Countless praises,salutes , appreciations and best regards for all the presenters of this video.
you explain the content with ease! i´ve been looking for some didatic explanation in portuguese (my mother tongue) but i haven´t found it ...so i came across to your video and i found it really well explained. Congrats and keep it going! you´re good at this.
Hello! I wanted you to know that since discovering your channel I've been binge watching a lot of your videos! Everything is explained both thoroughly and very clearly. So many videos out there are completely consumed with trying to have glitzy graphics or are extremely fast paced and "humorous".
Bro I don’t know about your basic knowledge but this can be easily understood if you have some knowledge already about chemistry. I mean am an a level student , I can’t solve questions of higher level unless I understand my own level Maybe you should take help of someone who has the basic knowledge. He can understand and make you understand this
13:36 "The orbital does not exist unless.. 'THE ELECTRON'.. is in the orbital" lol. Thanks for putting these videos together, I'm a visual learner and have really struggled with the conceptualization of this material. This was very helpful.
Thank you so so so so much. My teacher in school isn't very good, and the notes i had didn't make much sense to me (because I'm dyslexic, i find it hard to understand when it is written down!). This video has helped so so so much! Thanks!
This is exactly what a chemistry lesson should be like. Expensive software, devices, or fancy animations are not important. At the end of the day, how simple and easy-to-understand a lesson is are the determining factors of the lesson's quality, and the creator of this lesson did a great job with that.
Is this quantum model of atom which sir has explained
@@prmomaths757 Yes. Introduced the idea of a probability density function.
At least your country has expensive equipment. Our country only have bulky books so we have to rely on TH-cam
Please let you suppose that animated lessons are for the sake of simplicity, because animated images are likely to be copied in a mind and so be easy to memorise and visualize, thank you so much
Although learning with virtual reality does sound kind of cool too 😅😂
That guy explained in less than 15 mins what my chemistry prof was trying to do for an entire lecture!
Wait is it professor Deen?
@Crystal McKinney guess most professors are garbage on these courses.
We all are here because of the same reason😂😂
@@umairfarwees8223 i can't believe i got an A on chemistry during a pandemic and online.
@Sofia Ramos-Hidalgo stoichiometry can be a pain in the butt, but it's just like everything, the more you practice the better you get at it. It's merely converting a unit into a different unit. It does get easier and don't stress yourself out. Take breaks when studying when you feel you hit a wall. When you come back it's almost as if you have a different outlook. Hope everything goes well for you.
This video is a miracle for visual learners. Thank You!
Hi and thanks. While I should perhaps not get overly involved with your comment, as a teacher I have to speak up. Academics with no classroom experience and poor experimental design (if any), and the teachers who (mis)interpret their work, did and do the world a great disservice by introducing the concept of assigning different learning modalities according to sense (visual learner, tactile learner, etc.). I do not deny that people are often more comfortable with one modality versus another, or prefer one modality over another, but to be told by their teachers that they have one dominant learning modality is a sad misunderstanding of cognitive development, the learning process, psychology, and the strong influence that teachers have with their students. We need to be telling students that all learning modalities are important (they are), and that even though they may prefer one over another, or have been TOLD (by teachers!) that they learn better in one modality over another, the fact is we are telling this to people with enormously plastic brains, and what they need to understand is that they can LEARN to improve their learning in other modalities, and should in fact work at doing so, so that when their brains develop into adult brains, they can be adults that have a much greater capacity to learn in all modalities, which is so important in our very complex world. If you can learn in all modalities, then you can think in all modalities, and then you can make much deeper connections between all sorts of topics, and that makes you a far better thinker. And guess what? Adults have plastic brains too. They can learn to learn in all modalities. It is worth the effort!!!
Hope I didn't get too high on the soapbox! Thanks for "listening."
@@CrashChemistryAcademy I really appreciate this comment. As an older student, I can feel my physiology's resistance to thinking in these unfamiliar ways which is both alarming and invigorating. In running into these resistances, I get an experiential sense of broadening my mental horizons. It's a profoundly humbling experience and I appreciate your dedication to encouraging others to walk the path. I need all the encouragement I can get because it is so much easier to not try. Cheers, sir.
@@skinblanketed As a (somewhat) older learner myself, I know how fun it is to understand something you were struggling with. I'm right with you.
@@CrashChemistryAcademy you're great soul sir I HOPE UR DOING VERY WELL :)
@@alekku1782 😊
Wow out of so many other videos about orbitals, yours was the most clearest to me! I don't know if its just because I'm a visual learner, but whatever it is, your explanation is the clearest! Keep up the great work :)
ikr... I missed the class in school.... and I was so blank. god... this helped me a lot. at least I will now understand what's going on.
it was the clearest and it was slow and good visual graphics too.
Swati Ravishyam ikr. Crash Course and Khan Academy, despite how good they usually are, weren’t able to explain this as well.
@@lopkobor6916 exactly
This video along with couple of videos cleared up entirely. I began wondering and confusing myslef. I want able to imagine. Because anything to make sense u need to imagine it. And this video helped me get that .
Thanks a lot for this!
It's worth it to clarify that, even though the whole “s for sphere and p for polar” thing is good for remembering as a mnemonic, for example, that's NOT actually what the letters stand for. The shell or orbital s stands for *sharp*, p stands for *principal*, d stands for *diffuse*, and f stands for *fundamental*. And the reason early spectroscopists gave them those letters is the way the “spectral lines” produced from spectroscopy looked like in each case; s's lines were “sharp”, p's lines were the strongest (“principal”), d's lines were “diffuse” (scattered or perhaps fuzzy in contrast with s's sharpness), and f's lines’ frequency ratios were similar to that of Hydrogen's so seemed to them...“fundamental”. This may not help as much as the mnemonics for early students, but it will certainly help if a student likes chemistry or chooses a career in it; you don't want to sound misinformed or ignorant of those facts when talking to other chemists.
dude that is pretty cool
What about g, h, and i?
The quantum number 'spin' is why each orbital lobe when filled, only has two electrons, one spin up, the other spin down. It is absolutely forbidden for an atom to contain two electrons with same quantum numbers, hence spin up or spin down, though electrons do not appear to spin. Quantum stuff blew my mind.
to maintain the stability ie energy they spin in apposite directions
RokWisdawn That's very interesting, I've always wondered why they were given those letters.
The more complexly shaped the orbital (say d vs s), the more energy required (angular momentum) for an electron to remain in that area. It takes more energy for an electron to be in a d shape than in an s shape, thus 3d electrons have slightly higher energy than 4s.
May we speak somehow?
@@jazzyfizzlemorrison8233 Feel free to email me in the address provided in the "About" section on my channel homepage.
@@CrashChemistryAcademy I went there but no email. If you don't mind could I ask of it from you here in the public thread? If not we will find another compromise
@@jazzyfizzlemorrison8233 jaw1627@gmail.com
That's not true. The energy depends only on the principal quantum number n, your 3 or 4 in this case, as long as you have a single electron and you use non-relativistic quantum mechanics. The splitting of the energy levels is mostly due to the interaction of several electrons with each other, and there are also small corrections due to relativistic effects and the magnetic field of the nucleus.
I was having a hard time trying to visualize how orbitals overlap each other with different shapes and energy levels but this vid made it as clear as glass thankkk u genius
This is honestly one of the best explanations I’ve ever seen for chemistry, those visuals really work wonders
I agree !!
This is the best explanation I've found. It's a very simple concept when addressed properly. I don't know why no one else thought to clearly match the shape to the letter and draw it on an axes to clearly give us a picture.
Those who explain it the best understand it the best. I will be flicking through your videos when I have grasped this :)
Thank you SO much!
I was confused on orbitals for about a year and a half. My Honors Chemistry class didn't go into depth about them, and now that I'm in AP, we're expected to know them. Thank you for this video. I finally have an inkling of what they are.
Dude, you win! I've been trying to get a handle on this whole electron orbital setup (just for my own entertainment, cuz I'm a nerd and I'm into these things) and no other videos (even the really popular ones, like Bozeman science and Crash Course) explained it as well as you. Thanks!
I hope this question makes sense, but for the sake of pursuing higher learning would someone care to try and explain why there is a higher probability of finding an electron within _those_ specific shapes? Does it have to do with the way electrons repel each other? Even if someone could link me to an article or something I would be very appreciative!
The behavior of electrons in an atom is described mathematically by the Schrodinger Equation (1926) which is called the quantum mechanical model, and which is still used for the basis of quantum mechanics today with some modifications. The equation has four variables that describe electron behavior, and the values allowed for those variables are called quantum numbers. When plugging in the allowed quantum numbers, the orbitals emerge. The probability aspect comes from the Schrodinger Equation defining the electron as a wave as the basis for the math, and the wave came from Louis de Broglie describing the basis for the quantization of electrons as a wave phenomenon (1924) which was interpreted by Max Born (1924) to be referring to the electron's probability of existing in any particular location. In Schrodinger's equation, the letter psi represents the electron wave, and psi^2 represents the probability of where the electron might be at a given moment within an orbital, but the entire orbital can only be represented as a space in which there is a certain probability of finding an electron, the 90% used in the video. The "certain probability" is necessary, because at 100% probability, the orbital balloons to take up the entire universe: there is a 100% probability of finding the electron somewhere in the universe. If the probability is shrunk down to 90%, then the math is able to describe a space, the orbitals, that are reasonably small enough to define the size of an atom. You may want to view my video about de Broglie's wave interpretation here: th-cam.com/video/oLd-6UytkIU/w-d-xo.html.
@@CrashChemistryAcademy That was such an interesting and complete response, thank you so much! I have never heard the "100% probability" explained like that before. I will watch the video you linked and I truly appreciate the thoroughness of your reply!
@@scisarah3770 You're welcome! This is fun stuff!
@Proh Done Yes, any neutral atom has the same number of protons and electrons. If the number of electrons was different (an ion) its properties would be very different than the neutral atom.
To Aptua: I think the same way! If you look at the orbitals as described in this very good video, it does make you wonder why the electrons "choose" those configurations in particular. And yes - the math points to those shapes. But again, why? There are several things to consider. The electrons, being all negatively (and equally) charged, do repel each other. But at the same time, they're attracted to the protons in the nucleus. Also, there's the strong nuclear force to contend with. I don't have the math for any of this, understand, I just try to grasp things conceptually, forming ideas and pictures in my head. Notice one key thing, though: the shapes of the (90% probability!) orbitals are a bit like flattened tear drops. The largest area is farther away from the nucleus - and from the other electron. So, in a sense, you could picture (very crudely, of course) the idea that the electrons, though attracted to the nucleus, must avoid getting too close to each other. The 'balance' if you will, is a sort of compromise between forces. Again, that's really crude, but a workable mental picture. We certainly progressed a great deal over the old models! At first, we thought (or rather, assumed) that electrons would orbit the nucleus like planets orbit the sun. Then we developed the "cloud" model, where they were just smeared out around the nucleus in no particular order. Now, we have a much better idea (and handy computer visuals) of the actual shapes. I hope this helps some, without being too crude or off-kilter. tavi.
THANK YOU SOOOOO MUCH for making this tutorial. I was stuck for a week on this topic of orbitals until my friend recommended this video to my group. It is so clear cut and manageable in terms of understanding. Thank you so so much. :DD
❤
8 years ago. I wonder where this bright mind is now 😎
I love visual explaination because i can use my imagination rather than knowledge
you mean rather than text
@@Pitzuuuuuh ... its a 3 year old comment
@@GabrielGames100 5 year
@@AbsoluteArtist 6 years
27 yrs
I find this much better than Khan Academy! Excellent explanation and presentation.
Omer Khan plse don't compare. all teacher r giving their best only for us
This actually saved me. I was in tears because I didn't understand anything from the material my school gave me, and this helped me understand a lot. Thank you!
school is so f kin shit. I hate school
@@zekekace6882 but u shld enjoy schl life
@@fawndawn6159 nope
@@abdurrahmanlabib916 u r gonna miss it then
My teacher is really good, but you sir are in the next level! i love how you remind us of fundamental things over and over. keep up the good work!
This might be the best video explaining orbitals on TH-cam.
This helped a lot! I'm currently taking an online course in Chemistry and their explanations are very vague, I'm glad I found this :) Thank you!
The best explanation of orbitals. the sentence ( the shape is the probability of the position of the electrons, not the path) explained confusion for two semesters trying to grasp what these shapes are. Thank you so much!
🙂
OMG OMG!! Ive been trying to understand the image of electron configuration and orbitals in my head but I couldn't because my professor wasn't able to help me nor any of the tutors I hired. After looking through numerous videos I finally understand orbitals. THANK YOU SOOOO MUCH!!!
Panagiotis Tsampas the same in my case.
No one just wants to break down energy level, shape and number of electrons like you did. Everyone just likes to make things complicated. Thank you
Better explanation than khan academy
So much better! No hate on Khan Academy, I love em and watch their videos, but I was really confused when i watched the orbital video by them.
Myfavsandlikes I hate khan academy. Tyler Dewitt is the best chemistry you tuber and the only one who knows how to explain topics, unlike sal who loves to make topics sound as over-detailed and complicated as possible.
Actually yeah
So does Bohr technique work or should I choose a specific style for highschool?
@@justabarbiegirl The bohr model would only work for the hydrogen atom l so i would say keep it for finding electrons in the hydrogen atom
I've been trying to understand this topic for over 2 years. (I actually learned it 2 years ago, didn't understand it, and now have to learn it again) and I FINALLY UNDERSTAND. Thanks for being everything that my chemistry teacher should have been!!!!!
dude i have taken college chemistry 1 and 2 and organic 1 and am now in organic 2 and i've struggled with understanding orbitals the whole time. I'm just now actually understanding the concept thanks to your video. Awesome job at explaining while keeping in mind that people watching this probably reeeaaaally just want to be explained in detail but without confusing words and other harder concepts thrown in.
after checking 100's of youtube videos, i must say you are indeed the master of explaining things. your knowledge is concise and easy to understand and thorough.
only video i have seen that actually shows and explains how each orbital overlaps and is arranged around the nucleus !
PLEASE LOAD MORE VIDEOS....!
At last, after A Level Chemistry and a degree in Geology, a clear explanation, really appreciate it, could have done with this 30 years ago.
Thank you for this video! I'm getting back into Chemistry after 10 years, to further my career in the medical field. and quantum mechanical model was something I don't think I ever quite understood. I've watched a few videos, including Crash Course (I love the series. It's entertaining, but their orbital video didn't help me much). Your video broke it down and clarified the points I wasn't understanding. Thank you so much, and we'll done!
I am glad to realize that my intelligence was not the reason why I could not understand this. Thank you very much for giving me faith in the fact that teaching can be good.
this is the best explanation of orbitals that I have found on the internet.
Thank you kind sir. You just saved the lives of countless chemistry students out there.
I cannot believe that this video is 9 years old but explains this in the best way possible, i really needed a visual representation and here i have it. Broken down so well thank you.
You are fantastic and i wish i had a professor like you. Your videos may be saving me from failing my chem class in which I have the worst professor on earth. He complicated every single concept while you make it sound so easy. You da bomb.com
The best explanation combined with great visuals. and also explaing the overlapping and if I understand correctly the outer electrons can trespass into the lower energy level orbitals.I also like the clarity of naration. Thanks a heap.
Was so great,particularly about the visual representation . All I needed was an imagery of things snd this video perfectly meets what I need. Please do make such a helpful video for band gaps
Yes. The thing I needed was imagination. Simply telling that electrons move in orbitals and stuff wont reach the mind. Because u cant imagine that. This video helped me too.
Best video for me.
This 10 year old video helped me a lot.
awesome... i am glad glad i found this just in time since i am taking my as level exams soon. Thanks a lots , keep making more videos , you really are a great teacher why ? simply because you teach with no ambiguity, leaving us students with no questions but understanding.
I rarely post comments but this video is gold, no unnecessary effects, talk and music but straight to the point and detailed
Thanks 👍
Thank you! This was so helpful for my Chemistry exam~ I looked every where and this really helped me understand orbitals!
FINALLY. Ive been looking for an actual description of an orbital itself and this is the only place that doesent just describe the quantum numbers, THANK YOU
I drew them on Macromedia Freehand, which unfortunately is no longer commercially available. Adobe killed it, but their Illustrator is similar.
Just subscribed. I hope this guys doesn’t stop putting up videos. I noticed this one was posted 10 years ago
Thanks, I'm still around, making a few now and then. Your comment helps!
Bless you...
You just saved my life
Wonderful! Loved it! 3 months of madness and then rescued...thanks a lot
You're welcome!
Best explanation thus far. Thank you!
Oh my god. Life saving video. I have tried different videos, trying to figure out what these orbitals mean. Thank you so much. Subscribed.
This the first video that I have found that actually explains all aspects of this topic, +1 and a new subscriber.
Wow, thank you so much! My high school teacher is really bad at teaching and he always makes us do assignments all the time even though we don't really know how to. Our text book isn't very clear either. You explain everything carefully and visually so I bet anyone could learn from your videos! Cheers, REALLY good job!!
Thanks and good point-- my electron configurations vid goes into that.
I'm doing my A levels in germany this year and your tutorial is the best one I have seen.
I'm glad it was helpful!
I love the way of your presentation and looking forward to see more of this topics in the near future. Chemistry is my favourite subject and your explanation tremendously inspired me. I really appreciate your video clip and enjoyed learning from it. Thank you very much for making this video and for your generous heart of sharing your invaluable knowledge of Chemistry concepts.
I tell you....your explanation on orbitals is the best ever I know from any resource so far. Please keep up your work.
THANKS!!
I feel like I have a better understanding of orbitals after watching your video! Thank you so much! ^_^
Like the way you explained it all, most of the videos on TH-cam seem to me to be people trying to set a new speed record for fastest video. The presentation was great - thanks a lot
Honestly, this was such a good explanation.
This was so much more helpful than the crash course. This gave me all the information I needed without giving me so much extra detail that I got confused.
Finally satisfied , thanks so much....🙂🙂🙂
This stumble was Lucky.
Thanks a lot! I am from Germany and this video was a recommendation. But I immediately understood the topic with the video. You are much better than our teacher.
ich danke dir sehr
Extremely interesting video on orbitals .
the best video on arrangement of electrons around nucleus
thanks for clearing my long termed doubt
now it becomes super clear
Haha!! Guess who's acing his quiz tomorrow!? This was very helpful!
did you ace the quiz? :>>>
One of the best explanations out there, understanding that these shapes are areas where there's high probability for electrons to be is exactly the part I was missing, just changing "orbitals" to "areas" or some other word would have made it much less confusing, but I get the historical reasons (bohr model) thanks for the video!
Thank you so much for the video , I finally got to understand this. But what is the relation between the wave function psi and the different orbitals ?
wow !! ... Fantastic...Excellent explanation... Now I got it... It directly gone in to my head without raising any doubt. No other explanation satisfied me and thus I was searching in the internet till I got yours. Once again, thank you.
😊
Great video! Helped me alot.
My favorite part of your video is the diagram of the p orbitals.
Most diagrams make it look like these orbitals are connected in the center.
I couldn't understand how they could work based on those images.
Electrons cannot pass through the nucleus, right?
That tiny bit of space surrounding the nucleus (in your diagram) brought it all together for me.
Thanks, Mr. Zappa, sir
Great video! You sound like Steven Segal by the way :)
I've been researching my family tree and have discovered that I actually am Steven Segal. It was quite a shock, but the wealth and fame have cushioned the blow.
I recommend watching the crash course video about electrons and then watching this video because he does mention some things that he doesn't explain in the video, but they do in crash course. I finally understand now after the two videos
Much better than Hank Green!
haha yup
totally agree although he's been really good for everything else so far and I'm up to episode 25
I laughed so hard when I saw your comment omg
Nice to know I'm not the only one who didnt get Hank's explanation hahah
HAHA! You're so right! The only reason I watched Crash Course Chemistry is because his personality Is so addictive! >.< He doesn't explain it that great, but it's so fun to watch! X'D
Haha, I came here just because I didn't get the orbitals analogy about music.
I juts want to say....WOW. WOW. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I love chemistry and somehow the concept of orbitals was one of the things that just refused to be admitted into my brain and your video really cleared it up. THANK YOUUUUUU!!!!
Why are the axis mixed up? like isn't the vertical axis called "Y", and the slanted axis called "Z".
Thanks for the great video btw!
I know it's 5 years later, but I noticed the same thing
@@kriyaramjuttan9499 actually in 2d we have x and y lengths. And if we add it height to these lengths it will be in 3d. So if you think that you are looking from the positive side of z axis, you can see the x and y axises. I think that is the point. :)
This is just amazing! Anyone who wants to quickly revise the concept of orbitals can just watch this video
this is so much better than waking up to study.
Ikr, going to sleep studying is better than waking up studying hahaehaahoohoo
Thank you for taking the time to make this video. I'm a visual learner and my professor was explaining it verbally which at the time made no sense to me. Now I understand it.
wow !! I totally understand this. Thank you !!!!
it's been 5 years i had been trying to understand orbitals.. finally because of you i got it clearly.. thank you
Is it possibly easy to explain why dumb-bell orbitals have such an unusual shape? Same for doughnut shape, please. What is the root cause which influences the shape of orbitals?
Good question I would like to know as well.
its a solution to a 3-d equation - that shape solves the (eigen-) equation
Rick Deckard That's obvious, it doesn't need mentioning. What are the principal influences, in short, on which these equations are based? What two or three influences are in balance with each other?
HitAndMissLab thats obvious, if you know what an eigenfunction and probability amplitude are...lol....why are you even mentioning it?
Rick Deckard Its not obvious, to me at least. I am not an expert, but you are.
Thank You!!! spent almost two hours flipping from my orgo textbook to my chemistry textbook and other youtube videos and this video is the only one that made sense to me. Awesome!!
very well explained, thanks a lot
After searching and watching lot of videos on this topic for two days I found this simple & easy to understand video.Countless praises,salutes , appreciations and best regards for all the presenters of this video.
thanks for making this video it really helped in understanding ORITALS
you explain the content with ease! i´ve been looking for some didatic explanation in portuguese (my mother tongue) but i haven´t found it ...so i came across to your video and i found it really well explained. Congrats and keep it going! you´re good at this.
this video is awesome!!!! thank you
way better than my class ...i really appreciate your work ...i didnt even skip that 2 mins ad ...thank you sir
Heisenberg? The one who knocks?
No-- the one who cooks.
The one from whom the name was taken.
Then name Heisenberg is already taken. Would you like Heisebergknocks67?
Hello! I wanted you to know that since discovering your channel I've been binge watching a lot of your videos! Everything is explained both thoroughly and very clearly. So many videos out there are completely consumed with trying to have glitzy graphics or are extremely fast paced and "humorous".
Thanks so much, what a great compliment! Don't hesitate to post any questions you have.
It's actually my stage name. I occasionally appear on Breaking Bad to add a little authenticity to the proceedings. My real name is Frank Zappa.
Best explanation I found so far! Now I finally got it!
I still don't understand. But science no one else is complaining I'll go cry myself to sleep
Since*
What is it exactly that you don't understand?
Andres fierro you and me both
Bro
I don’t know about your basic knowledge but this can be easily understood if you have some knowledge already about chemistry.
I mean am an a level student ,
I can’t solve questions of higher level unless I understand my own level
Maybe you should take help of someone who has the basic knowledge.
He can understand and make you understand this
This guy is the type of teacher that can teach anything and anyone can learn
i learned a lot ........tq for posting
The first and only explanation of orbitals that really made sense to me. Thanks very much!
diagrams were useful
13:36 "The orbital does not exist unless.. 'THE ELECTRON'.. is in the orbital" lol. Thanks for putting these videos together, I'm a visual learner and have really struggled with the conceptualization of this material. This was very helpful.
demo starts at 3:00
Thank you so so so so much. My teacher in school isn't very good, and the notes i had didn't make much sense to me (because I'm dyslexic, i find it hard to understand when it is written down!). This video has helped so so so much! Thanks!
Is it just me? I'm addicted to the sound of him writing in the background!!!!!!!!!!
Wow...you made a 7th grader understand the complex concept of orbitals in just about 15 minutes. Amazing lesson...tysm!
😊
amazing
bane goade
Bless you, you are the only person on the internet that can explain this