It's still a performance board. It has a hip squash to help pivot off the bottom. Compared to a good wave shortboard, the tail is actually pretty wide. The overall board is meant to be wider with a rounder outline. These are adjustments from the normal shortboard for not "good waves" but for your daily SoCal stuff. So, compared to your performance shortboard it's shorter, wider, with more volume, has rounder profile outline, and has a bigger block tail. It compares to other shapers: Pyzel Red Tiger, Lost Sub Driver. These are variations with slightly different characteristics meant to take a performance shortboard into sub-par conditions. For twin plus trailer, there are other boards that complement that setup that Thomye has reviewed. More fishy or midlenth boards have the tail width for that setup. They're wider, with flatter rockers, are more buoyant, and tend to plane more, so the big twin/trailer works, whereas this is more performance-less planning, more driving off a sunken tail with a thruster setup. It's a good board for sure and Thomye makes it look good, but in deciding - on a spectrum, this is more performance shortboard and less fishy twin/trailer.
I just recently did it again on my Mashup. I have to get out of the habit of pulling my front leg before I kick my back foot. Doesn't happen often but my last one hurt pretty bad. :(
Loved the insight! We surfed the same dimensions but in a thruster and I enjoyed the board. There were no magical moments for me on the board but solid all around.
Thanks for the review! So glad you used the mashup to compare the board. I have the mashup and was actually looking for a "step up" option, for when the conditions get slightly better (still around the 2 ft range where you could perfectly ride both but are feeling more keen to something more performance). Seems like this could be a good complement. Where I live the waves never go beyond 2.5-3 ft and is still very mushy, so it's a very thin line to walk when you're trying to cut on the groveler features and add more performance on the mix. If you get to read this would appreciate if you can let me know if this makes sense or if I am way off. Cheers and thanks again!
I've owned many boards. The Cado is instantly the best groveler I've ever surfed. Never learnt to surf the Seaside, just didn't make sense to my style perhaps. Chumlee and Potatoes were good in exactly the right conditions but terrible in anything else. Thanks Rob, i think you've nailed it 🙏
Great Video Mr. T, very explanatory. Always an unlimited source of knowledge. Happy to subscribe to any other channel of yours to represent and support 💯🙌🏼💪🏽🤙🏼
Thanks man. Always enjoy your vids. I’ll look through your other vids to see if you have done one on the Sunday.. it’s sparked my interest of late. I’ll be comparing that against the Moe, as a next board. Cheers Jas
nice. Yeah, I've done quite a few of the Sunday since I have 3 of them, LOL. 5'6, 6', 6'8. The fin options is what intrigued me so I put out as many videos as I could. I haven't done one of the 5'6 though. I may before I get rid of it. For me, it's fun but when I get into that length, I would rather be on a conventional board for performance. but the 6' and 6'8 are in my quiver forever. :)
I’m 5’11” an intermediate surfer with bad shoulders and I got a 6’0” with medium thruster fins, and it works great for me. I can still put it on rail and it’s an easy paddler. I use it in choppy East Coast Florida shorebreak 🤙🏼
Great stuff! Already subscribed to the new channel! Btw I sprained both my knees at the same time on a close out because I didn’t have enough wax on the board. Learned it the hard way
ouch. that sucks. Sprains are the worst cuz you can't surf. I had a knot on my head but was able to surf the next day. I should have rewaxed or combed it. :)
Beautifull board, please try to make another video with good waves. For the waves you caught, probably the best board should be in the spine teck construction. I had two original dumpster divers, 10 years ago, what a great board it was. There was no epoxy back then. Already subscribed the other channel, hope you get a couple in the weekend.
I saw your last video where you were trying surf over the foam. You literally did the exact movement needed to do a 360 but didn't commit that upper body. You would have had it. bro.
Picking up my custom order DD2 from XTR for my upcoming waco trip soon, should be interesting. Might be worth the purchase to get the new futures vector fins. I got them and they've been amazing on my phantom and gremlin.
@@leecarterreppinjesuschrist7686 DD2 has better low end range than the phantom. I also ordered the DD2 at 6'0 while my phantom is 6'2 (I'm 6'4). Tried the DD2 in the pool and ocean with the new Dane fins, might be my new favorite board. Basically ride the DD2 for chest high and below and phantom for head high plus. Would be interesting to see if Thomye would like it more with it being 4 inches shorter than him and dane fins.
@@spiffjiff05 thanks for that info!! Its def out of the phantom and dd2 for me.. are they very similiar performance wise? Im guessing the phantom is slightly easier to throw around
@@leecarterreppinjesuschrist7686 My DD2 is 2 inches smaller than my phantom, so it's more responsive than the phantom. Phantom will paddle a little better but not have as good as a low end as the DD2. There's more foam pushed forward on the phantom which makes it paddle better but not turn as sharp if that makes sense. Either way you can't go wrong.
@@spiffjiff05thanks for that!! Im thinking of having this for my groveller as i dnt really like proper grovellers and the pyzel mini ghost for when it gets a bit bigger
I have one and initially used AM2 fins. It felts sticky compared to my Happy Everyday. I bought the DD2 fins and it's perfect for it. Board started to feel loose but still holds and goes fast. You should try it with the DD2 fins.
@@damienphelan666 unfortunately I have not tried the HapEv, so I can't directly compare them. When I look at the stock dims and compare them by size, the HapEv seems to be narrower/thinner/less volume (by the slightest of bits). however, it seems like the HapEv has a slightly wider tail. A comparison would be interesting for sure. If you compared them my volume, then the HapEv would be a tad taller so then you would have more board to push around. Again, really difficult to say without surfing them back to back. Maybe on the next demo day.
@@damienphelan666 The DD2 has a flat deck and less rocker. Single concave (dd2) vs single to double (happy everyday). With that DD2 goes faster overall. Happy Everyday is looser(easier to turn) while DD2 felt like you really need to set the rail to get those turns. I think HE and DD2 can handle same wave height but HE will be more reliable on steeper bigger waves while DD2 will be more fun in smaller waves because of the speed it gives. CI mentioned in their reviews that surfing DD2 is like Dane and Happy Everyday is like Taj Burrow. Both works great but different approach. I’m only an intermediate surfer (thomye is way better) so my inputs are on that level.
LOL, almost knocked me out. I saw stars for some time. That was a literal "off the lip". Yeah I'm not sure. You let me try the PJ Pro once, but I think you were running the Machado pivots. I think that board needs a raked fin or 2 +1. Maybe if you ever bring it out again, you'll have to let me try it. I'm going to work on the GWT next. you should try that one.
The Mick Fanning ones are from the carver family with more rake, for that board you want the opposite of that, a pivot fin a little more upright like the Mayhem’s I’ve meant before
Great review! So valuable to see boards in subpar waves. Have you asked Noel Salas for a potential collaboration? You could borrow the boards he tests. Nothing to lose in asking I guess. Haha that last wave, painful!
I haven't reached out yet. I don't feel my production level and videos are up to snuff. LOL he might elevate me a bit but I might drag him down so I thought to wait a while. I did get my Dominator 2 from him directly and regarding the white tiger, just coincidence that the guy who loaned it to me bought several boards from Noel. Anyways, This year is looking really good for boards unlike last year. Last year was rough. Definitely though, my ultimate goal is to review boards as they are released. I feel like I'm about 6 months to a year behind on board. And with filler boards, I'm about a year to 2 behind. But I feel they are still useful. I really wanted to review the HI Moe mini but none available for me to look at. :( Hoping to squeeze in the Boss up. in early July though, the CI demo comes back. Last year I did the Bobby Quad, this year, in my usual late fashion, I hope to do the G-Skate and/or the M23. Thanks again Fox for your support. Super appreciate it brotha. Cheers.
@@ThomyeSurfs Fair enough mate. I think you’re not far off, I would look at the video editing of other reviewers for inspiration. You definitely get more views with just released boards. Fillers are fine, especially with some timeless boards, it’s always useful. I saw your list of upcoming boards, I am looking forward to it.
I've not tried the Phantom yet so, I can't really do a direct comparison but looking at the specs and shape, they are similar but I think the Phantom will have more rocker. which means it may require a bit more wave or curve to the wave. So, the phantom is more performance oriented. I think to get the same volume, you would have to go almost 2" longer on the phantom.
Great review! Does this board perform better in smaller surf than the dominator 2? I’m looking at this board the mash up, the dominator 2 and the bobby quad? I surf in NJ and the majority of days in the summer are smaller so I need a great paddler without losing the performance.
Comparing the 4 boards I'll do it in 4 types of conditions: small + soft, small + punchy, medium, and lastly bigger better wave, not huge just bigger around head high plus. s+s - BQ advantage wider tail and swallow, mashup advantage flatter rocker and swallow, dom2 and DD2 likely interchangeable. Both have similar tails but it will depend on what you compare them by. It will have to be either height or volume. by height, meaning if I surfed them both at 5'7, I would have 1.5 L more on the Dom2 so it would likely paddle better and grovel better. By volume, I'd have to surf the 5'6 for the Dom2. I' like longer boards for this type of shape. If you like the feel of a smaller board without actually going smaller, Dom2 cuz of wide point back makes the board feel smaller than it is. I tested the 5'4 and it was way too short for me. Felt like I was surfing a 5'2. s+p - Mashup advantage, slightly narrower tail, flatter rocker, shorter for better performance. BQ advantage, flat and shorter, Dom2 cuz you could ride it a tad shorter, might fit pocket better. The dd2 works well but is longer by design if you surf it at your volume. m - Mashup advantage, fast board with knox fins. It's just my favorite. DD2 cuz of the performance features and outline, Dom2 cuz it is similar to in shape to DD2 but it might have too much volume at 5'7. BQ, wide tail might hinder performance for the average guy. b - DD2 for the outline, tail, super responsive. Almost twitchy is what i felt. Dom2 for tail and design. Mashup, sort of flat so I found it to get tighter and with swallow, a little tracky in bigger waves. BQ to flat, tail too wide, not the best for bigger better waves. I put the boards in order of good to not as good in those conditions. Also keep in mind that it is subjective and my perception. It could go different for you. Overall from small to medium waves, Mashup for the win. it was medium to big and good shape, like lowers trestles, DD2 out of these 4. medium to big softer not as good, maybe the dom2. BQ for micrwaves. One last thing, I have never surfed the dom2 in the 5'6 or 5'7. I only surfed it as a 5'4 and it was way too short. so hard for me to really have an opinion on that so my eval above is just based on theory. Cheers. sorry for the long answer. haha
@@ThomyeSurfs wow thank you so much for the info. I really appreciate the detailed response. I have the No Brainer slater designs and I ride it as a quad. I loved the stability and hold in solid head high. But haven’t given it a good go in smaller surf or in a pool yet. That’s another question I had, which board do you think works best pools? I’m gonna go to NY wave pool American Dream Mall and was planning on riding the No Brainer but I’m worried it’s not going to have enough volume and or thickness but not sure. Thanks again for your time and info.
@@scottcuttre9705 I can't really speak to that pool since Waco is the only one I've been to. And since I don't know the No Brainer and/or you and your surfing, I will just say this, for me, of the 4 choices above, I would say the Mashup. Although the wave is small, it is punchy and cupped. At waco, you want a shorter board that has a lot of drive. Although I surfed the FT and not the Mashup, I know or a fact that the Mashup would have worked really well there. I've seen video of the pool in NY and I would pick my mashup for that wave as well. I would do my FT but since that wasn't one of the 4 we stated this conversation with, i'll omit that one. Anyways, BQ's tail might be too wide to a cupped out wave, per the reason I gave already. Although the DD2 and Dom2 would work, they would be longer, might be too much swing weight.
@@ThomyeSurfs thanks again for the great info. I really want to try Waco and the NY pool. The one thing that worried me about the NY pool is that they say to ride a board with more volume. My options right now are limited board wise. I only have the No Brainer, a Stretch fletcher 5 fin, which I haven’t ridden in a long time and a Schroff twin that I ride when it’s small because it’s a thick wide 80s type board but I don’t really want to ride it at the pool. I kinda want to ride the board I can do my best turns on. So with the 4 boards you helped me with, since my funds are limited which board do you think would be the best for NJ surf and for pools? From what you wrote I’m guessing the Mash up? I’m not sure I still love the review of the Bq. Your surfing in that small surf was crazy! Plus with DD2 and the D2 I’m leaning towards the D2. What do you think? And thank you again for your time and insight.
@@scottcuttre9705 Mashup. The issue with the BQ again, might be the wider tail but also, you are only limited to a quad. Not that it is bad but I love quads but nice to have the other options. I think the D2 and DD2 are better ocean boards only cuz you will likely get it longer.
I haven't tried the Xero Fusion yet. I was just in a shop that had one and it felt amazing. But it was 1 size too big for me. :( It was in the new HiFi 3.0 construction and it reminded me of the Sharpeye FT in carbon that I have. I'm really interested in this board. As for the DD2 compared to RNF96, I haven't ridden the RNF96 so it is hard for me to say but based on design, the DD2 seems to be more performance oriented and the RNF96 being more grovel. I good indicator of this is width to height ratio. I tested the DD2 in a 5'7 which was only 19.25" wide. The RNF96 if I were to surf it at about the same liters, would be a 5'4 but the same width. it is taking the same amount of foam and putting it in a board 3" shorter. Anyways, it's a minimal difference. I think if your waves are bigger, then the DD2 is a better option. If the wave less than head high and medium to soft, then RNF96. Again, this is a guess since I haven't tried the RNF yet.
I have the Twinsman in the chamber. :) www.youtube.com/@ThomyeSurfs/community I posted the boards I plan to review this year. I only have one album in there. Hard to get these on loan, even my best buddies won't loan me theirs. LOL I don't blame them, they are rather pricey.
If I remember correctly the NB2 was actually faster. That slip I mentioned in the DD2 review doesn't happen. However the NB2 had a different type of slip. On my backside bottom turn when I had a lot of speed The corner of the tail would lift the rear fin out of the water and I would lose traction. But that board was fast but both boards need somewhat of a better wave or steeper wave because of their rockers and I think the NB2 had a little bit more rocker but I don't remember since it was so long ago.
I know you found the answer for those the might be reading the comments. if the waves are small and soft, BQ all the way. if they have some curve to them, they are about the same. If the waves get bigger, the DD2 has a much higher ceiling than the BQ.
that's a loaded question. haha let me ask you a question, what is your weight, height, and normal board in terms of volume. And, what specific board are you riding at the moment? Lastly, what do your waves look like? Are they soft like mine?
Thank you for getting back to me! I’m 6’, 182 and the waves I surf are very similar to the ones in your video. I’ve been surfing mostly alternative shapes like a Vulcan tachyon 32.5L or Gary McNeil rtt 31L but my last ghost 4 years ago was roughly 30L.
@@hugohugo911 dang, you ride your boards small. The DD2 i rode was 27.8 and at my weight, that is a factor of .191724. If I took that and used your weight, that should put you on 34.89L. I guess technically, I'm riding mine too big. haha Going the other way, using your weight and volume ratio, I should be on a 24.7L board which is right but for me the issue is length of board. the 5'7 is the right size, the 27.8L is more liters than i should be surfing. It keeps me a tad out of the water. At any rate, answering your question. from the looks of it, you seem to be very fit and paddle well. If you aren't struggling there, I would say that you should go on the lower end but at your height, I think you should factor in the rail line. This type of shape, a normal daily driver / performance shape, I would consider more than the volume. For me, I like my to have the board close to my height or taller. Taller if the board narrow. This one is grovel wide so 5'7 made the most sense for me.
@@ThomyeSurfs hey mate really appreciate again your thorough answer. This helped a lot. Volume wise i reckon I’m a bit on the low side but the tachyon 5’3 and rtt are super special in their planing shape that they still paddle great and grovel amazing. Out of a small wave performance shortboard I don’t want it overly short, so I think I’ll go 5’10. I actually did the same calculation of your litres to pounds and you’re ripping! I think the extra litres should be alright. Cheers!
Would the board brands/shops be willing to loan you boards to test? They have those traveling demo board vans and I’ve definitely made purchase decisions based on your reviews
I have been lucky a few times with firewire demo days. but the last two demo days, the waves sucked and so did the weather. It rained I think. CI does a travel demo which is awesome. I did the bobby quad review on a demo board. And they let me go 4 days on it so that helped me with getting enough board time to do a proper review. At lot of other shapers don't have demo fleets. :( I've reached out to a bunch of local shapers some time a go and a lot of them either ignored me or they told me to buy which I can't really afford to. Resale is super important for me at the moment. I need to be able to get rid of the board if I buy it. Although the most recent ones I've purchased, I have loved so much they are still in my quiver. I have a couple of really good friends that want to loan me their boards but unfortunately, they ride their board bigger.
Thoughts on the pu vs spintek? Pairing this with a rnf 96, ci twin pin and a lane splitter. All my other boards are pu but the spinetek looks great on these
that's a good question. I know with the Bobby Quad, spinetek was better for me cuz I was groveling. So depending on what you plan to surf, I'd say go with PU for better waves, and if you are looking for it to grovel a tad better, then do the Spinetek.
Hi Thomye. Great review. How do you think this would compare to a SharpEye Inferno 72? I ride that as my HPSB. Looking for a small wave performance board, but wondering if the DD2 is too similar to the Inferno 72.
I have not ridden the 72 yet, only the FT. My buddy who has both said they are different and by design, I can sort of predict what the 72 would be like. Having said that, which version of the 72 do you have? Sharpeye makes 2 to 3 versions in almost every size. Example, they have 3 versions of the 5'8, 25.5L, 26.6L, and 29.10L. If you want a small wave performance board, you will want the new board to be more agile, so maybe a bit shorter or if it's the same length, one that moves the wide point back so it feels smaller. You also want it to be slightly more liters so maybe a tad wider and a smidge thicker. so it will carry you with less energy. You don't want to go too big from your normal HPSB cuz then it will be too chunky. Having said all that, if you have the two smaller version of the 5'8 example, 25.5 or 26.6 (mind you, this is just an example, I don't really know which size you have) the 5'7 DD2 would be a great step down. You are going 1" shorter, a tad wider, and 1L more at 27.8L. Check out your specs on your 72 and then go to the ci website and see how it comares to a board that is 1" to 2" inches shorter. Again, you want to go shorter, a tad wider, a smidge thicker, and 1L more. Hope that all makes sense. Cheers
@@ThomyeSurfs Thanks for getting back to me. My Inferno 72 is 6'0 x 19 3/4 x 2 5/8 - 31.5L and the DD2 I'm looking at is 5'10 x 20" x 2 9/16" - 32.40 L so that should work nicely based on your advice. How does the DD2 compare to a CI Sampler? That's my all time favourite small wave board. Cheers
@@Henry46444 I have never ridden the Sampler but it was one of those I always wanted in my quiver just based on the outline. I think they are super similar with the Sampler actually being a little less grovel. The Sample if you are comparing them by length, is narrower and less volume by a smidge. Almost sites between the 72 and DD2. So provided you go a tiny bit smaller than your old sampler, your DD2 should go nicely. :) this is just based on specs and theory of course. you can get on 10 different dd2's, all the same size, and one will surf better than the rest. it could come down to fin placement or even just foam density in different places. generally, they will be similar but something makes certain boards more special.
@@ThomyeSurfs Thanks for the reply. The DD2 sounds like what I'm looking for. Do you find it's loose enough in small waves with the single concave? I've only really ridden single to double concave in my small wave boards.
@@Henry46444 I think it is loose enough. it's got a bit of tail rocker so it will swivel a bit. One thing though, I tried it as a thruster and found it best but it was tighter and more drivey which I like. As a 2+1, if the fins weren't too big, it got pretty loose. Likely the smaller back fin. There are tweaks you can make, I need to get more footage of this board as a thruster so I can put out a part 2. This board was borrowed so I need to get it back to the owner asap. He wasn't to sell it.
You rip Thomye no doubt. However, do you think the board looked a little bit over sensitive/twitchy in the footage. I always thought you look very smooth and there’s a lot of flow but this board kinda looked abit less flowy
yea, in the beginning for sure and it had to do with the tail and fins setup. I said it was easy rail to rail which is code for super sensitive. Once I got the footing down, it was better but still the fin setup made it super twitchy. I will get it out once as a thruster and let everyone know how that goes.
much better as a groveler. The NB3 went well for me in the bigger waves. the DD2 just needed steepness and not so much size. if it had a vertical face, it went well. On the softer stuff, you just had to be on rail.
Another great review! You mentioned that using a 2+1 requires more foot movement. I was wondering if you could elaborate on that. BTW subscribed to your other channel. Hit me up if you ever make it to Hawaii!
with a 2+1, your front fins are obviously the bigger fins, they are usually twins. That will give you drive and hold but only if you surf over them. So, when pumping down teh line to get speed, it helps to be over the front fins. In the video at, 3:14 and 3:57 you will see me standing at the front tip of the traction pad. Right over the front fins. This is why the board is driving so well. Before that, I was standing too far back thinking it was like my Sharpeye FT which as a quad and swallow, you don't need to shuffle as much. Having said that, the reason so many people recently love 2+1's is that if you are standing just behind the front fins, as most people do, it really makes the board feel loose especially at slower speeds. The bigger front fins act like a pivot point. Most people like that, I personally don't like that unless i'm turning or doing a maneuver. Check out the wave at 2:17, you will see me at the middle of the pad which is just behind the front fins. you will see that the board swivels. Some people like that so it all depends on your preference. Anyways, that is basically what I meant. when surfing a 2+1, you have to drive with your back feet over the front fins and then shift back to do maneuvers. Thrusters are similar but not as drastic and quads for me, I can keep my feet planted in between the fins the entire time. I don't seem to have to adjust as much. Regarding Hawaii, for sure. My daughter's are both at college next year so without kids at home, I'm going to take advantage of those spring time $200 round trips to Hawaii as often as possible.:) Where do you surf out there?
@@ThomyeSurfs Wow, that was a detailed explanation, thank you for that!!🙏🏼🤙🏼 So I live on the east side of Oahu and Diamond Head is of the most consistent breaks and close to me so I probably surf there the most. We also surf this one spot which is a really far paddle, but my buddy has a key for a private dock, which makes the paddle way shorter. That place can get really good. Depending on swell direction, we also surf at Ala Moana. Wintertime, I try to get up to the North Shore when I can. My favorite spot is probably Laniakea and Mokuleia Beach Park.
@@jasonk7860 that's pretty cool to have that dock. Definitely hit you up if I head over. My buddy from high school lives on the west side but I've never surfed there. I've only surfed the bowl mostly and rock piles. I have to say, waves in HI are so different. It was tiny and I caught a 1' wave at Rock Piles on a board that was way too small for me. I got like 6 really good back side turns. Not sure how a 1' wave (California size - knee high), was able to push me like that. Definitely next year, when flights go cheap, I am going here as often as possible. Going to leave like 2 boards in HI too. Hit me up on email.
it's the Sharpeye FT in dark arts. The Sharpeye FT is similar to their 72 model but is quad and swallow tail. Still a high end performance board for us normal humans, a groveler for a pro.
I put the link in the description of this video. Thanks for the follow. Hoping that my daughter's cats can pay for the boards and soloshot cameras. LOL
Cats?! Oh hell no. I’m a dog person all the way lol! It looks like this is a thruster setup not intended for twin plus? Thruster setups have the side fins further up. 🤙🏼
@@allsurf LOL, I am too, a dog person that is. But because of my work schedule, I cannot get a dog. It would be unfair to the dog. :( Although the perfect time to have gotten one was that first year of covid, I was home every day. If only I had known. And as for the thruster, yes, I agree. The DD2 is designed to be a thruster for sure but the Mashup was as well and that one went better as a 2+1. It could be the swallow though. That extra hold and tracking maybe makes up for the smaller back fin. I'll also measure them when I get the chance. I think for me at least, cuz of my front footed preference, 2+1s work better usually unless it is a rounded pin or squash, at least that is what i'm starting to figure out. The surf has been so bad that I didn't get too many opportunities in different fin setup. I'm hoping I do get to surf it as a thruster though before I have to give the board back. :) Wish me luck. Cheers brotha.
@ThomyeSurfs I was going to say about the front footed thing, totally agree. I'm very back footed thus without the trailer it slides a lot and swallows work well because the extra traction points. Also, I am glad you didn't get a dog as you would have to quit your job to take proper care of it. However, if you get to 5 cats I may have to pretend I don't know you.😅
Where you riding PU or Spine Tek construction? Do you have any comments about the Spine Tek? If you had to choose between your Mashup or the Dumpster diver 2, which would you pick?
I rode the PU DD2. So for my waves, I would definitely go with the Mashup. The DD2 has a higher floor and higher ceiling so if the waves got good, the DD2 would be a better choice but my average conditions calls for more grovel less performance so Mashup all the way.
It's hard for me to compare because I tested the Dom2 in 5'4, 25+ liters. I think I would need to compare it to the 5'6 Dom2 in order to have a better idea but one thing about the Dom2 is that the wide point is back from center. That makes the board feel smaller. so in order for me and my front footedness, I would want to ride it 5'7 or 5'8 but then it's way more liters. 5'8 was my favorite size for the original dom but that put me at 31L. It felt the best but then wasn't great in bigger waves cuz of the liters. Long explanation short, I prefer the DD2 in comparison to the Dom2 size the volume ratio.
definitely right. What's weird is that I have other thrusters that I don't really connect with as thrusters so I do the 2+1 and it is better. This board was one of the first thruster designed boards that I liked better as a thruster. so definitely a thruster.
It's still a performance board. It has a hip squash to help pivot off the bottom. Compared to a good wave shortboard, the tail is actually pretty wide. The overall board is meant to be wider with a rounder outline. These are adjustments from the normal shortboard for not "good waves" but for your daily SoCal stuff. So, compared to your performance shortboard it's shorter, wider, with more volume, has rounder profile outline, and has a bigger block tail. It compares to other shapers: Pyzel Red Tiger, Lost Sub Driver. These are variations with slightly different characteristics meant to take a performance shortboard into sub-par conditions. For twin plus trailer, there are other boards that complement that setup that Thomye has reviewed. More fishy or midlenth boards have the tail width for that setup. They're wider, with flatter rockers, are more buoyant, and tend to plane more, so the big twin/trailer works, whereas this is more performance-less planning, more driving off a sunken tail with a thruster setup. It's a good board for sure and Thomye makes it look good, but in deciding - on a spectrum, this is more performance shortboard and less fishy twin/trailer.
this is a great way to review a board, thank you.
Shredding that thing - that last clip with the head hit was brutal
I just recently did it again on my Mashup. I have to get out of the habit of pulling my front leg before I kick my back foot. Doesn't happen often but my last one hurt pretty bad. :(
I have one of these and this review nails it. Really good when the wave has curve but gets slippy on flat faces.
Great review, Thomye! DD2 looks great under your feet in subpar CA waves🤩
Makes me think of the days in high school when the surf team would check Dane’s blog everyday for a new video! You’re ripping on that thing!
I got my answer later in this video. Thanks Thomye!
Love how it has a good positive glide during paddle in. Just ordered one!
yeah, i think it's the lower entry rocker. mine paddled well cuz it was over my liters but still surfed really well. I liked it as a thruster best.
Loved the insight! We surfed the same dimensions but in a thruster and I enjoyed the board. There were no magical moments for me on the board but solid all around.
Thanks for the review! So glad you used the mashup to compare the board. I have the mashup and was actually looking for a "step up" option, for when the conditions get slightly better (still around the 2 ft range where you could perfectly ride both but are feeling more keen to something more performance). Seems like this could be a good complement. Where I live the waves never go beyond 2.5-3 ft and is still very mushy, so it's a very thin line to walk when you're trying to cut on the groveler features and add more performance on the mix.
If you get to read this would appreciate if you can let me know if this makes sense or if I am way off. Cheers and thanks again!
Great review Thomye, this is my favourite one of yours so far mate 👍
Thanks bro. You going to review this one? I am curious how this would compare to the Happy Everyday.
@@ThomyeSurfs I don’t think so, but I’d be keen to try it one day 👍
Thanks for this review
Super useful since, as you mentioned, you showed very well how it works in small mushy waves
I've owned many boards. The Cado is instantly the best groveler I've ever surfed.
Never learnt to surf the Seaside, just didn't make sense to my style perhaps. Chumlee and Potatoes were good in exactly the right conditions but terrible in anything else.
Thanks Rob, i think you've nailed it 🙏
Great Video Mr. T, very explanatory.
Always an unlimited source of knowledge.
Happy to subscribe to any other channel of yours to represent and support 💯🙌🏼💪🏽🤙🏼
Thanks man❤ Another great surfing video!🤙🏼
Appreciate the kind works and comment. :)
Thanks man. Always enjoy your vids. I’ll look through your other vids to see if you have done one on the Sunday.. it’s sparked my interest of late. I’ll be comparing that against the Moe, as a next board. Cheers Jas
nice. Yeah, I've done quite a few of the Sunday since I have 3 of them, LOL. 5'6, 6', 6'8. The fin options is what intrigued me so I put out as many videos as I could. I haven't done one of the 5'6 though. I may before I get rid of it. For me, it's fun but when I get into that length, I would rather be on a conventional board for performance. but the 6' and 6'8 are in my quiver forever. :)
"411 SCORE", AWESOME BREAKDOWN YEEEEEEEEEAAAAAHHHHH!!
👏😎👏
I’m 5’11” an intermediate surfer with bad shoulders and I got a 6’0” with medium thruster fins, and it works great for me. I can still put it on rail and it’s an easy paddler. I use it in choppy East Coast Florida shorebreak 🤙🏼
Great stuff! Already subscribed to the new channel!
Btw I sprained both my knees at the same time on a close out because I didn’t have enough wax on the board. Learned it the hard way
ouch. that sucks. Sprains are the worst cuz you can't surf. I had a knot on my head but was able to surf the next day. I should have rewaxed or combed it. :)
Beautifull board, please try to make another video with good waves. For the waves you caught, probably the best board should be in the spine teck construction.
I had two original dumpster divers, 10 years ago, what a great board it was. There was no epoxy back then.
Already subscribed the other channel, hope you get a couple in the weekend.
We not gonna talk about the casual 360? haha. Always making it look easy. #shred !
I saw your last video where you were trying surf over the foam. You literally did the exact movement needed to do a 360 but didn't commit that upper body. You would have had it. bro.
Beat me to it 😂 such a fun board.
Picking up my custom order DD2 from XTR for my upcoming waco trip soon, should be interesting. Might be worth the purchase to get the new futures vector fins. I got them and they've been amazing on my phantom and gremlin.
If youve surfed the dd2 now? How does it compare to the phantom?
@@leecarterreppinjesuschrist7686 DD2 has better low end range than the phantom. I also ordered the DD2 at 6'0 while my phantom is 6'2 (I'm 6'4). Tried the DD2 in the pool and ocean with the new Dane fins, might be my new favorite board. Basically ride the DD2 for chest high and below and phantom for head high plus. Would be interesting to see if Thomye would like it more with it being 4 inches shorter than him and dane fins.
@@spiffjiff05 thanks for that info!! Its def out of the phantom and dd2 for me.. are they very similiar performance wise? Im guessing the phantom is slightly easier to throw around
@@leecarterreppinjesuschrist7686 My DD2 is 2 inches smaller than my phantom, so it's more responsive than the phantom. Phantom will paddle a little better but not have as good as a low end as the DD2. There's more foam pushed forward on the phantom which makes it paddle better but not turn as sharp if that makes sense. Either way you can't go wrong.
@@spiffjiff05thanks for that!! Im thinking of having this for my groveller as i dnt really like proper grovellers and the pyzel mini ghost for when it gets a bit bigger
I subscribed to your new, additional channel. I am interested to hear your thoughts on van camping and surfing. Good luck on this new endeavor!
Thanks, appreciate it.
I have one and initially used AM2 fins. It felts sticky compared to my Happy Everyday. I bought the DD2 fins and it's perfect for it. Board started to feel loose but still holds and goes fast. You should try it with the DD2 fins.
I didn't realize they had a dd2 specific fin. That's awesome, thanks for the info.
@@ThomyeSurfsworth the investment, they would work really well on all small wave boards
How do you find the DD2 compared to the Happy Everyday ?
@@damienphelan666 unfortunately I have not tried the HapEv, so I can't directly compare them. When I look at the stock dims and compare them by size, the HapEv seems to be narrower/thinner/less volume (by the slightest of bits). however, it seems like the HapEv has a slightly wider tail. A comparison would be interesting for sure.
If you compared them my volume, then the HapEv would be a tad taller so then you would have more board to push around. Again, really difficult to say without surfing them back to back. Maybe on the next demo day.
@@damienphelan666 The DD2 has a flat deck and less rocker. Single concave (dd2) vs single to double (happy everyday). With that DD2 goes faster overall. Happy Everyday is looser(easier to turn) while DD2 felt like you really need to set the rail to get those turns. I think HE and DD2 can handle same wave height but HE will be more reliable on steeper bigger waves while DD2 will be more fun in smaller waves because of the speed it gives. CI mentioned in their reviews that surfing DD2 is like Dane and Happy Everyday is like Taj Burrow. Both works great but different approach. I’m only an intermediate surfer (thomye is way better) so my inputs are on that level.
Thanks!
Legend. Thanks brotha.
Haha! Love the elegant dismount into shore, ouch! good review mate! But that surf🤢….gunna stick to my JS’s.
LOL, forgot it wasn't my board so I had to ditch the board right before it hit sand. It was too close, almost scratched teh bottom.
The “in ya face” turn was sick! 😂
Wondering how the DD2 compared to puddle jumper pro? 🤔
LOL, almost knocked me out. I saw stars for some time. That was a literal "off the lip".
Yeah I'm not sure. You let me try the PJ Pro once, but I think you were running the Machado pivots. I think that board needs a raked fin or 2 +1. Maybe if you ever bring it out again, you'll have to let me try it. I'm going to work on the GWT next. you should try that one.
If it's slipping as a 2+1 I've found that the MF Hatchet twin + trailer really helps to give it a bit more grip.
Best configuration to surf that board is some upright fins like the mayhem set
I'll try it. I did try it with the Mick Fanning thrusters and that went way better than the 2+1.
The Mick Fanning ones are from the carver family with more rake, for that board you want the opposite of that, a pivot fin a little more upright like the Mayhem’s I’ve meant before
Yeah the ticket is a rake side fin and pivot center like the Dan fins that pose to be ridden with the board.
Great review! So valuable to see boards in subpar waves.
Have you asked Noel Salas for a potential collaboration? You could borrow the boards he tests. Nothing to lose in asking I guess.
Haha that last wave, painful!
I haven't reached out yet. I don't feel my production level and videos are up to snuff. LOL he might elevate me a bit but I might drag him down so I thought to wait a while. I did get my Dominator 2 from him directly and regarding the white tiger, just coincidence that the guy who loaned it to me bought several boards from Noel.
Anyways, This year is looking really good for boards unlike last year. Last year was rough. Definitely though, my ultimate goal is to review boards as they are released. I feel like I'm about 6 months to a year behind on board. And with filler boards, I'm about a year to 2 behind. But I feel they are still useful.
I really wanted to review the HI Moe mini but none available for me to look at. :( Hoping to squeeze in the Boss up.
in early July though, the CI demo comes back. Last year I did the Bobby Quad, this year, in my usual late fashion, I hope to do the G-Skate and/or the M23.
Thanks again Fox for your support. Super appreciate it brotha. Cheers.
@@ThomyeSurfs Fair enough mate. I think you’re not far off, I would look at the video editing of other reviewers for inspiration.
You definitely get more views with just released boards. Fillers are fine, especially with some timeless boards, it’s always useful.
I saw your list of upcoming boards, I am looking forward to it.
Great vid and review as always Thomye. Still using Soloshot?
yeah. the new 3+. it's been good for some things but not others. I will say that overall, I like it better than my old 3.
Great review how does the dd2 compare to pyzels phantom?
I've not tried the Phantom yet so, I can't really do a direct comparison but looking at the specs and shape, they are similar but I think the Phantom will have more rocker. which means it may require a bit more wave or curve to the wave. So, the phantom is more performance oriented. I think to get the same volume, you would have to go almost 2" longer on the phantom.
Great review! Does this board perform better in smaller surf than the dominator 2? I’m looking at this board the mash up, the dominator 2 and the bobby quad? I surf in NJ and the majority of days in the summer are smaller so I need a great paddler without losing the performance.
Comparing the 4 boards I'll do it in 4 types of conditions: small + soft, small + punchy, medium, and lastly bigger better wave, not huge just bigger around head high plus.
s+s - BQ advantage wider tail and swallow, mashup advantage flatter rocker and swallow, dom2 and DD2 likely interchangeable. Both have similar tails but it will depend on what you compare them by. It will have to be either height or volume. by height, meaning if I surfed them both at 5'7, I would have 1.5 L more on the Dom2 so it would likely paddle better and grovel better. By volume, I'd have to surf the 5'6 for the Dom2. I' like longer boards for this type of shape. If you like the feel of a smaller board without actually going smaller, Dom2 cuz of wide point back makes the board feel smaller than it is. I tested the 5'4 and it was way too short for me. Felt like I was surfing a 5'2.
s+p - Mashup advantage, slightly narrower tail, flatter rocker, shorter for better performance. BQ advantage, flat and shorter, Dom2 cuz you could ride it a tad shorter, might fit pocket better. The dd2 works well but is longer by design if you surf it at your volume.
m - Mashup advantage, fast board with knox fins. It's just my favorite. DD2 cuz of the performance features and outline, Dom2 cuz it is similar to in shape to DD2 but it might have too much volume at 5'7. BQ, wide tail might hinder performance for the average guy.
b - DD2 for the outline, tail, super responsive. Almost twitchy is what i felt. Dom2 for tail and design. Mashup, sort of flat so I found it to get tighter and with swallow, a little tracky in bigger waves. BQ to flat, tail too wide, not the best for bigger better waves.
I put the boards in order of good to not as good in those conditions. Also keep in mind that it is subjective and my perception. It could go different for you. Overall from small to medium waves, Mashup for the win. it was medium to big and good shape, like lowers trestles, DD2 out of these 4. medium to big softer not as good, maybe the dom2. BQ for micrwaves.
One last thing, I have never surfed the dom2 in the 5'6 or 5'7. I only surfed it as a 5'4 and it was way too short. so hard for me to really have an opinion on that so my eval above is just based on theory.
Cheers. sorry for the long answer. haha
@@ThomyeSurfs wow thank you so much for the info. I really appreciate the detailed response. I have the No Brainer slater designs and I ride it as a quad. I loved the stability and hold in solid head high. But haven’t given it a good go in smaller surf or in a pool yet. That’s another question I had, which board do you think works best pools? I’m gonna go to NY wave pool American Dream Mall and was planning on riding the No Brainer but I’m worried it’s not going to have enough volume and or thickness but not sure. Thanks again for your time and info.
@@scottcuttre9705 I can't really speak to that pool since Waco is the only one I've been to. And since I don't know the No Brainer and/or you and your surfing, I will just say this, for me, of the 4 choices above, I would say the Mashup. Although the wave is small, it is punchy and cupped. At waco, you want a shorter board that has a lot of drive. Although I surfed the FT and not the Mashup, I know or a fact that the Mashup would have worked really well there. I've seen video of the pool in NY and I would pick my mashup for that wave as well. I would do my FT but since that wasn't one of the 4 we stated this conversation with, i'll omit that one. Anyways, BQ's tail might be too wide to a cupped out wave, per the reason I gave already. Although the DD2 and Dom2 would work, they would be longer, might be too much swing weight.
@@ThomyeSurfs thanks again for the great info. I really want to try Waco and the NY pool. The one thing that worried me about the NY pool is that they say to ride a board with more volume. My options right now are limited board wise. I only have the No Brainer, a Stretch fletcher 5 fin, which I haven’t ridden in a long time and a Schroff twin that I ride when it’s small because it’s a thick wide 80s type board but I don’t really want to ride it at the pool. I kinda want to ride the board I can do my best turns on. So with the 4 boards you helped me with, since my funds are limited which board do you think would be the best for NJ surf and for pools? From what you wrote I’m guessing the Mash up? I’m not sure I still love the review of the Bq. Your surfing in that small surf was crazy! Plus with DD2 and the D2 I’m leaning towards the D2. What do you think? And thank you again for your time and insight.
@@scottcuttre9705 Mashup. The issue with the BQ again, might be the wider tail but also, you are only limited to a quad. Not that it is bad but I love quads but nice to have the other options. I think the D2 and DD2 are better ocean boards only cuz you will likely get it longer.
have you tried the xero fusion ?
also how do you like the DD2 compared to the RNF 96 ?
I haven't tried the Xero Fusion yet. I was just in a shop that had one and it felt amazing. But it was 1 size too big for me. :( It was in the new HiFi 3.0 construction and it reminded me of the Sharpeye FT in carbon that I have. I'm really interested in this board.
As for the DD2 compared to RNF96, I haven't ridden the RNF96 so it is hard for me to say but based on design, the DD2 seems to be more performance oriented and the RNF96 being more grovel. I good indicator of this is width to height ratio. I tested the DD2 in a 5'7 which was only 19.25" wide. The RNF96 if I were to surf it at about the same liters, would be a 5'4 but the same width. it is taking the same amount of foam and putting it in a board 3" shorter.
Anyways, it's a minimal difference. I think if your waves are bigger, then the DD2 is a better option. If the wave less than head high and medium to soft, then RNF96. Again, this is a guess since I haven't tried the RNF yet.
will you review Album surfboards?
I have the Twinsman in the chamber. :) www.youtube.com/@ThomyeSurfs/community I posted the boards I plan to review this year. I only have one album in there. Hard to get these on loan, even my best buddies won't loan me theirs. LOL I don't blame them, they are rather pricey.
Awesome review Thomye. How would you compare this to the NB2?
If I remember correctly the NB2 was actually faster. That slip I mentioned in the DD2 review doesn't happen. However the NB2 had a different type of slip. On my backside bottom turn when I had a lot of speed The corner of the tail would lift the rear fin out of the water and I would lose traction. But that board was fast but both boards need somewhat of a better wave or steeper wave because of their rockers and I think the NB2 had a little bit more rocker but I don't remember since it was so long ago.
Do you think the DD2 is better than the Bobby quad, for high performance surfing, in very small waves such as in your Bobby quad review video?
I know you found the answer for those the might be reading the comments. if the waves are small and soft, BQ all the way. if they have some curve to them, they are about the same. If the waves get bigger, the DD2 has a much higher ceiling than the BQ.
Great review! Quick question, if you are between sizes volume wise would you size up or down? Thank you!
that's a loaded question. haha let me ask you a question, what is your weight, height, and normal board in terms of volume. And, what specific board are you riding at the moment? Lastly, what do your waves look like? Are they soft like mine?
Thank you for getting back to me! I’m 6’, 182 and the waves I surf are very similar to the ones in your video. I’ve been surfing mostly alternative shapes like a Vulcan tachyon 32.5L or Gary McNeil rtt 31L but my last ghost 4 years ago was roughly 30L.
@@hugohugo911 dang, you ride your boards small. The DD2 i rode was 27.8 and at my weight, that is a factor of .191724. If I took that and used your weight, that should put you on 34.89L. I guess technically, I'm riding mine too big. haha
Going the other way, using your weight and volume ratio, I should be on a 24.7L board which is right but for me the issue is length of board. the 5'7 is the right size, the 27.8L is more liters than i should be surfing. It keeps me a tad out of the water.
At any rate, answering your question. from the looks of it, you seem to be very fit and paddle well. If you aren't struggling there, I would say that you should go on the lower end but at your height, I think you should factor in the rail line. This type of shape, a normal daily driver / performance shape, I would consider more than the volume. For me, I like my to have the board close to my height or taller. Taller if the board narrow. This one is grovel wide so 5'7 made the most sense for me.
@@ThomyeSurfs hey mate really appreciate again your thorough answer. This helped a lot.
Volume wise i reckon I’m a bit on the low side but the tachyon 5’3 and rtt are super special in their planing shape that they still paddle great and grovel amazing.
Out of a small wave performance shortboard I don’t want it overly short, so I think I’ll go 5’10.
I actually did the same calculation of your litres to pounds and you’re ripping! I think the extra litres should be alright. Cheers!
@@hugohugo911 yeah, that one board is funky. Looks sick though.
Would the board brands/shops be willing to loan you boards to test? They have those traveling demo board vans and I’ve definitely made purchase decisions based on your reviews
I have been lucky a few times with firewire demo days. but the last two demo days, the waves sucked and so did the weather. It rained I think. CI does a travel demo which is awesome. I did the bobby quad review on a demo board. And they let me go 4 days on it so that helped me with getting enough board time to do a proper review. At lot of other shapers don't have demo fleets. :(
I've reached out to a bunch of local shapers some time a go and a lot of them either ignored me or they told me to buy which I can't really afford to. Resale is super important for me at the moment. I need to be able to get rid of the board if I buy it. Although the most recent ones I've purchased, I have loved so much they are still in my quiver. I have a couple of really good friends that want to loan me their boards but unfortunately, they ride their board bigger.
Thoughts on the pu vs spintek? Pairing this with a rnf 96, ci twin pin and a lane splitter. All my other boards are pu but the spinetek looks great on these
that's a good question. I know with the Bobby Quad, spinetek was better for me cuz I was groveling. So depending on what you plan to surf, I'd say go with PU for better waves, and if you are looking for it to grovel a tad better, then do the Spinetek.
Just pulled the trigger on the Spinetek. Looks so good, hopefully surfs good too. I’ll be hitting the San Diego beachies
@@Ian-1080 congrats. Getting a new board feels so good , it never gets old.
@@ThomyeSurfsyup. Just added a Pisces black sheep as well
Dumpster Dive OG was a flatter deck?
deck I'm not sure. I never had the OG so can't compare, sorry.
Hi Thomye. Great review. How do you think this would compare to a SharpEye Inferno 72? I ride that as my HPSB. Looking for a small wave performance board, but wondering if the DD2 is too similar to the Inferno 72.
I have not ridden the 72 yet, only the FT. My buddy who has both said they are different and by design, I can sort of predict what the 72 would be like. Having said that, which version of the 72 do you have? Sharpeye makes 2 to 3 versions in almost every size. Example, they have 3 versions of the 5'8, 25.5L, 26.6L, and 29.10L.
If you want a small wave performance board, you will want the new board to be more agile, so maybe a bit shorter or if it's the same length, one that moves the wide point back so it feels smaller. You also want it to be slightly more liters so maybe a tad wider and a smidge thicker. so it will carry you with less energy. You don't want to go too big from your normal HPSB cuz then it will be too chunky.
Having said all that, if you have the two smaller version of the 5'8 example, 25.5 or 26.6 (mind you, this is just an example, I don't really know which size you have) the 5'7 DD2 would be a great step down. You are going 1" shorter, a tad wider, and 1L more at 27.8L.
Check out your specs on your 72 and then go to the ci website and see how it comares to a board that is 1" to 2" inches shorter. Again, you want to go shorter, a tad wider, a smidge thicker, and 1L more. Hope that all makes sense.
Cheers
@@ThomyeSurfs Thanks for getting back to me. My Inferno 72 is 6'0 x 19 3/4 x 2 5/8 - 31.5L and the DD2 I'm looking at is 5'10 x 20" x 2 9/16" - 32.40 L so that should work nicely based on your advice. How does the DD2 compare to a CI Sampler? That's my all time favourite small wave board. Cheers
@@Henry46444 I have never ridden the Sampler but it was one of those I always wanted in my quiver just based on the outline. I think they are super similar with the Sampler actually being a little less grovel. The Sample if you are comparing them by length, is narrower and less volume by a smidge. Almost sites between the 72 and DD2. So provided you go a tiny bit smaller than your old sampler, your DD2 should go nicely. :) this is just based on specs and theory of course. you can get on 10 different dd2's, all the same size, and one will surf better than the rest. it could come down to fin placement or even just foam density in different places. generally, they will be similar but something makes certain boards more special.
@@ThomyeSurfs Thanks for the reply. The DD2 sounds like what I'm looking for. Do you find it's loose enough in small waves with the single concave? I've only really ridden single to double concave in my small wave boards.
@@Henry46444 I think it is loose enough. it's got a bit of tail rocker so it will swivel a bit. One thing though, I tried it as a thruster and found it best but it was tighter and more drivey which I like. As a 2+1, if the fins weren't too big, it got pretty loose. Likely the smaller back fin.
There are tweaks you can make, I need to get more footage of this board as a thruster so I can put out a part 2. This board was borrowed so I need to get it back to the owner asap. He wasn't to sell it.
You rip Thomye no doubt. However, do you think the board looked a little bit over sensitive/twitchy in the footage. I always thought you look very smooth and there’s a lot of flow but this board kinda looked abit less flowy
yea, in the beginning for sure and it had to do with the tail and fins setup. I said it was easy rail to rail which is code for super sensitive. Once I got the footing down, it was better but still the fin setup made it super twitchy. I will get it out once as a thruster and let everyone know how that goes.
I know you didn't like the NB3. How does the DD2 feel different as a performance groveler?
much better as a groveler. The NB3 went well for me in the bigger waves. the DD2 just needed steepness and not so much size. if it had a vertical face, it went well. On the softer stuff, you just had to be on rail.
Another great review! You mentioned that using a 2+1 requires more foot movement. I was wondering if you could elaborate on that. BTW subscribed to your other channel. Hit me up if you ever make it to Hawaii!
with a 2+1, your front fins are obviously the bigger fins, they are usually twins. That will give you drive and hold but only if you surf over them. So, when pumping down teh line to get speed, it helps to be over the front fins. In the video at, 3:14 and 3:57 you will see me standing at the front tip of the traction pad. Right over the front fins. This is why the board is driving so well. Before that, I was standing too far back thinking it was like my Sharpeye FT which as a quad and swallow, you don't need to shuffle as much.
Having said that, the reason so many people recently love 2+1's is that if you are standing just behind the front fins, as most people do, it really makes the board feel loose especially at slower speeds. The bigger front fins act like a pivot point. Most people like that, I personally don't like that unless i'm turning or doing a maneuver.
Check out the wave at 2:17, you will see me at the middle of the pad which is just behind the front fins. you will see that the board swivels. Some people like that so it all depends on your preference.
Anyways, that is basically what I meant. when surfing a 2+1, you have to drive with your back feet over the front fins and then shift back to do maneuvers. Thrusters are similar but not as drastic and quads for me, I can keep my feet planted in between the fins the entire time. I don't seem to have to adjust as much.
Regarding Hawaii, for sure. My daughter's are both at college next year so without kids at home, I'm going to take advantage of those spring time $200 round trips to Hawaii as often as possible.:) Where do you surf out there?
@@ThomyeSurfs Wow, that was a detailed explanation, thank you for that!!🙏🏼🤙🏼
So I live on the east side of Oahu and Diamond Head is of the most consistent breaks and close to me so I probably surf there the most. We also surf this one spot which is a really far paddle, but my buddy has a key for a private dock, which makes the paddle way shorter. That place can get really good. Depending on swell direction, we also surf at Ala Moana.
Wintertime, I try to get up to the North Shore when I can. My favorite spot is probably Laniakea and Mokuleia Beach Park.
@@jasonk7860 that's pretty cool to have that dock. Definitely hit you up if I head over. My buddy from high school lives on the west side but I've never surfed there. I've only surfed the bowl mostly and rock piles. I have to say, waves in HI are so different. It was tiny and I caught a 1' wave at Rock Piles on a board that was way too small for me. I got like 6 really good back side turns. Not sure how a 1' wave (California size - knee high), was able to push me like that.
Definitely next year, when flights go cheap, I am going here as often as possible. Going to leave like 2 boards in HI too. Hit me up on email.
What is the FT surfboard you mentioned?
it's the Sharpeye FT in dark arts. The Sharpeye FT is similar to their 72 model but is quad and swallow tail. Still a high end performance board for us normal humans, a groveler for a pro.
Have you tried it as a thruster yet?
yes, thruster works best so far. but I used the mick fanning large. :)
Do we need link to new channel search couldn't find it...
I put the link in the description of this video. Thanks for the follow. Hoping that my daughter's cats can pay for the boards and soloshot cameras. LOL
Cats?! Oh hell no. I’m a dog person all the way lol! It looks like this is a thruster setup not intended for twin plus? Thruster setups have the side fins further up. 🤙🏼
@@allsurf LOL, I am too, a dog person that is. But because of my work schedule, I cannot get a dog. It would be unfair to the dog. :( Although the perfect time to have gotten one was that first year of covid, I was home every day. If only I had known.
And as for the thruster, yes, I agree. The DD2 is designed to be a thruster for sure but the Mashup was as well and that one went better as a 2+1. It could be the swallow though. That extra hold and tracking maybe makes up for the smaller back fin.
I'll also measure them when I get the chance. I think for me at least, cuz of my front footed preference, 2+1s work better usually unless it is a rounded pin or squash, at least that is what i'm starting to figure out. The surf has been so bad that I didn't get too many opportunities in different fin setup. I'm hoping I do get to surf it as a thruster though before I have to give the board back. :) Wish me luck. Cheers brotha.
@ThomyeSurfs I was going to say about the front footed thing, totally agree. I'm very back footed thus without the trailer it slides a lot and swallows work well because the extra traction points. Also, I am glad you didn't get a dog as you would have to quit your job to take proper care of it. However, if you get to 5 cats I may have to pretend I don't know you.😅
Where you riding PU or Spine Tek construction? Do you have any comments about the Spine Tek?
If you had to choose between your Mashup or the Dumpster diver 2, which would you pick?
I rode the PU DD2. So for my waves, I would definitely go with the Mashup. The DD2 has a higher floor and higher ceiling so if the waves got good, the DD2 would be a better choice but my average conditions calls for more grovel less performance so Mashup all the way.
@@ThomyeSurfs I appreciate the feedback. Thanks!
forgot to answer the first question. Spinetek for my softer weaker waves. but the PU is likely better if you are in better surf.
@@ThomyeSurfs Thanks!
How does this compare to the dominator 2.0?
It's hard for me to compare because I tested the Dom2 in 5'4, 25+ liters. I think I would need to compare it to the 5'6 Dom2 in order to have a better idea but one thing about the Dom2 is that the wide point is back from center. That makes the board feel smaller. so in order for me and my front footedness, I would want to ride it 5'7 or 5'8 but then it's way more liters. 5'8 was my favorite size for the original dom but that put me at 31L. It felt the best but then wasn't great in bigger waves cuz of the liters.
Long explanation short, I prefer the DD2 in comparison to the Dom2 size the volume ratio.
Not sure its designed for a 2 plus 1. Id stick to thruster
definitely right. What's weird is that I have other thrusters that I don't really connect with as thrusters so I do the 2+1 and it is better. This board was one of the first thruster designed boards that I liked better as a thruster. so definitely a thruster.
I put my bottom teeth through my lower lip one day in a similar fashion. It was 9/11 and I was getting stitches watching the WTC disaster
ouch, I haven't put my teeth through but I have had a board go all the way through. :( injuries suck.