The fact that Playstation isn't releasing just the shells for current PS5 owners is criminal. Even if the shells were marked up due to the 30th Anniversary it'd be a much easier pill to swallow.
Shit isn't Atari or Namco the reason most games don't have mini games during the loading screens? Remember a company patented that so why it's not common place.
FYI there are patent from Ocarion of Time.... Any idea why Nintendo has nevered used them to sue anyone??? They can't sue against copyign design as it fall under "Fan work" (They already had a case against Fan works which they lost, if you wondering what fan works it is Rule 34) - so Nintendo has no choice to use Patent to Sue Pocket pair (They took 8 months to investigate to find the best way to deal with this obivous theft)
Lmao, with or without you, I think they will survive. Remember all the fake outrage surrounding the PS3 price? Yeah? Well, the PS3 still became the fastest selling console in the UK. No amount of protest or boycotts will change a thing. There is a world outside of the internet.
@rockothetaco95 right? I already have a PS5 system and 3 duelsense controllers and a portal. Nothing announced in the collection catered to me so they won't get any money from me when they would if they just release simple plates. I know the company isn't going to magicly shut down because I'm not purchasing something here but it's a shame I can't celebrate the 30th anniversary when I've been a long time Playstation fan since the beginning.
It's pretty bad that to salvage the PS5 Pro reveal disaster, all it takes is essentially retro plates and a retro themed PS dualsense... really? That meme image chart of the ups and downs of Playstation is getting crowded.
This is true. It should also be noted that big corporations like Nintendo do not start fights they do not expect to win. They took most of a year to collect info and evidence. They have won every lawsuit I can recall.
@@trinity31409 Nintendo isn't invencible, they have lost cases. Nintendo vs Galoob, Nintendo vs rule34 of pokemon(ngl, that is embarrassing, to lose against furries) and I'm certain that there are others. No one knows the future outcome.
@@trinity31409you're half-right, but that's just the basics of big business lawsuits. The Pokémon Company likely sent their lawyers right away and lawyers usually take a long time to do anything because they want to be extremely thorough. But not always is the point to win the lawsuit, sometimes it's to send the competition a message and it waste their time and resources.
@@johansvensson833No, that’s no the case, if they lose they’ll pay Nintendo a compensation and then they’ll settle continue distributing the game but now paying royalties to Nintendo for the patents, or they can modify the mechanics that infringe patents too. I don’t see them pulling the game or delisting it.
I find it funny how people are completely ignoring the huge amount of monster catching/training games on Nintendo console through the years, just so they run wild with their bs narrative. Nobody knows what the patent is about, it's just speculation.
Admittedly I am a Nintendo investor, but also speaking from a legal perspective/experience, until you know all the facts and legal intricacies, how could you definitively conclude this entire case is BS? With decent knowledge surrounding Japanese law, until they make their first court appearance, they aren’t compelled to fully and publicly release the reasonings behind why they are bringing forward a case.
You know why Nintendo left temtem and the many pokeclones out there? Despite have more mechanics similar to Pokemon? Because at least they do have far original monster designs that Sugimori will never do. I betcha Ken and his design team are so furios of this that Nintendo may have said "We might not be able to sue you for copying our designs but we can sue you for all things you never account. We have more than the many patent you never knew we had"
@@inamorta47-playertwistthis isn't about designs. It's a patent claim. Things like mounts and throwing items. Really vague. It's a BS lawsuit trying to bully them into a settlement
@@inamorta47-playertwist basically, the patents they're claiming apply to a huge range of games, including World of Warcraft. It's also a retroactive claim, which won't fly in the US, but will in Japan. Let them try to sue Blizzard and see what happens. This is nothing more than a big corporation bullying an indie dev.
It's actually not that broad IGN put out an article about the patent earlier and the infographic for the mechanic specifically shows an orb with a button as the creature capture device so basically if Palworld was even slightly original they probably could have dodged this suit.
i would recommend watching thomas game docs' video on the nintendo colopl lawsuit basically since the 80s japanese game devs have patented very basic features to prevent patent trolling from companies outside the games industry. for example, snk had patented the title screen. these were never enforced. they've had this unofficial code of honour to not abuse patents like this. nintendo keeps up this tradition to this day. the only time in recent memory nintendo has pursued patent infringement was in said colopl lawsuit, where the company was going after other companies with patent lawsuits. it turned out nintendo had filed a patent over a decade prior that was the same thing they were suing other companies for, so they sued colopl for patent infringement. obviously nintendo makes dumb lawsuits, and i dont like their attitude in regards to fan games and rom sites. but i also dont like pocketpair's history of blatantly ripping off other games. not even just with palworld (although it's pretty obvious with palworld), they've made other games that rip off games like breath of the wild, minecraft, hollow knight, dead cells and among us.
@@Lucarioguild7 The infographic shows an orb. But if you read the patent it doesn't specify an orb. It just states an item. Which means even if PocketPair changed it from a sphere to a cube, Nintendo can still claim ownership.
@@Lucarioguild7 No, the infographic is displaying the broad nature of the patent in a visual medium. But the Actual wording itself (which is the patent) doesn't state anything about just an orb. It only (and purposely) uses the word object.
Same as when Palworld came out. I knew people weren't going to care about the game that much. It has some cool ideas but it felt like a Roblox game with a better style.
It does come with a cover for the disc drive at least so when you do get a disc drive again pop it over but still it really sucks that they don't have one for the OG PS5
CD-i was the first optical disc based console, or if you count optional attachments it was TurboGrafx-16 with CD-ROM². Sega CD and 3DO also released before the PlayStation.
Because the price isn't a real world problem. It was just something for people to complain about for a week. Anyone actually interested in getting it aren't going to cry over the price.
@@CarlosXPhoneonly online tho. In real life you will find the opinion is usually different. Just like here on TH-cam most seem to believe everyone wants a disc drive which is NOT true. Only 10% of gamers or less use disc
@@kennypowers1945 I'm one of those who like disc systems, but I dabble into buying games online for less than $30 MSRP. Anything beyond that? Physical. Its way too much money to pay $60 online, with no recourse - they did it to MvC2. $70 online is major YIKES.
Absolutely I'm thinking there might be some on the knockoff market so maybe? How do I take a white sugar Saturn cover with a little Segata on the corner
Gotta love the fact that early adopters are treated the worst in the gaming industry. Worst versions of games, least amount of support for hardware, pays the most, so on and so on.
@@MyManJFKTVGaming corporations has yielded me the perk of becoming debt free (Nvidia my golden goose I got in extremely early in 2015-16). I can live with “treated the worst” as long as I still get paid. Perks of being an investor and a gamer. Win-win scenarios over the last 12-13 years in the investing space.
@@MyManJFKTVkinda seems more like a recent trend, but people still buy early so who's more at fault here the companies, and their horrible practices, or consumers, and their stupid buying habits?
@@Tom-yz3opyes they did, I think in one instance it had to do with the botw c&d wave they had a while. back. And a game that had a similar name to one of their older titles.
Maybe the scalpers already are on the payroll. Companies have bots posting as if they're real people on social media. Why not have your own scalpers "buy" their consoles and resell them for twice the price?
To anyone who is confused about the situation. This is a Patent infringement lawsuit, not a Copyright infringement like everyone thought back in the day. So this lawsuit has nothing to do with artwork or character design. Instead it involves mechanics. The apparent mechanics in question (I could be wrong) that Nintendo has patented and are suing for are (so far) (1) The targeting system of tossing an (not an orb) object at a creature in an overworld, like what we see in Legends Arceus. (2) Mounting and Dismounting a flying creature in the overworld. (3) And releasing creatures into the over world via an object. What's even crazier is that the patent(s) was apparently refiled in May of this year which was AFTER Palworld's release. And was a month or so right before Sony and Pocketpair publicly announced a new partnership to branch Palworld into many of the same avenues of entertainment and media that Pokemon has experienced.
People put feelings over personal responsibility these days. That's why things are so messed up now. You know, like how companies have to hire the blue-haired activists instead of the creative people because they don't want the activists to feel bad that they can't get the job based on talent.
Nintendo using a lot of Sony patents too, it's a normal thing in the gaming industry, every company uses someone elses patents and never gets sued unless they overstep boundaries. I guess that's what happened here. Last time someone tried to patent and ask a fee for a thing Nintendo technically owned they went nuclear on them in court.
@@TakisEnjoyerglad to see someone knows their gaming history, the reason the japanese game devs even patents everything showed itself when the wiimote lawsuit happened, then colopl came and did a major stupid move, nintendo was even trying to warn them privately with 1 year negotiation period
@@rei1556 Yeah, Nintendo actually isn't one to throw out spurious and false legal accusations. They can certainly be DICKS about who they accuse and what they file suit about, but they are rarely "wrong" in the legal sense.
@@modermonkula Nintendo owns the copyright, so it's still Nintendo. They could tell the Pokemon company to slow down, and Game Freak to put more resources into the games but they don't.
@@tempestnova6715 Strange since they have almost unlimited money to make a fantastic Pokémon game, yet the last few just feel so half assed and basic. The ip is trapped with a development team with as much creativity as a fifa game
@@tempestnova6715Nintendo can't tell Game freak or TPC shit about how to run the Pokemon IP, they only own 33.33% of the IP and guess who owns the other 2 thirds? You have three guesses and the first two don't count.
Spawnwave is just flat out wrong on the law. Nintendo can 100% have obtained a patent in 2021 and enforce it on PalWorld. First off, the development for PowerWorld was announced in 2021. Nothing in that implies or hints at game mechanics. They did not have any patents. Meanwhile, Nintendo's patent was for a game that came out in 2021. On a side note, it makes perfect sense that Nintendo only recently filed suit. This is because the game only recently was actually released. Before now, it was still in beta and could have been changed to work differently.
Game play copyrights is a tough one. While I understand protecting games and their ideas to a degree, I can’t help think that overall game development takes too long and games are too infrequent within a given bracket for it to be anything but stifling for the industry.
Being able to patent a gameplay mechanic is sickening and shouldn't be allowed. How the hell does Nintendo have a patent on catching a wild animal with an item? I'm pretty sure we've been doing that for thousands of years before Nintendo existed with nets and snares.
Gaming patents are the worst. If the OG game devs had patented their game mechanics then Nintendo and Pokemon wouldnt exist. No Mario games if the first person to make a platforming game patented "jumping on platforms and moving sideways in a level"
Maybe. However patents are granted for novel development. They must be new invention and distinct from previously existing things to get approved. So simple platforming would not be patentable as it was a common element in game design. It would not be unique enough.
@@trinity31409 Thats my point though. It wasnt a common element when gaming first came about. If the first person to come up with that concept patented it then we wouldnt have most of the modern gaming industry. Same applies for the first FPS game, and any other "First"
They earned enough money that I highly doubt they'd run out of money anytime soon. 30$ per Game and only 1 month after release they already sold 15 million copies.. that are 450.000.000$
So what if they do? As long as Nintendo isn’t harmed financially and I still get paid decently as a 10+ equities Nintendo investor, then that’s what matters. Dog eat dog world.
What I dont understand is why are they going after palworld when there are multiple monster taming games on the switch like coromon and nexomon who both are getting new games soon. They both have same mechanics like encounter a creature and catching them in devices.
Something's wrong with that Dragon Ball game... why are there so many characters attached to the game instead of selling them individually as micro dlc? Is this 2003?
Lmao, Nintendo does a really good job in publishing DQ in the west. Without them, we probably wouldn't have the 9th game and the 3DS remakes. Their past made it certain for the Switch success. Dragon quest is arguably only successful due to their massive success on Nintendo machines dating back decades. Square and Nintendo extremely tight knit. Nice try, though.. feel free to try again. 🤣
@@anon1692 They're referencing an image that has made the rounds that compares Dragon Quest monsters to Pokémon designs. It is used as some sort of gotcha, but it is just designs based on either real life insects/mammals or mythical/folklore creatures.
Yeah Square should sue Nintendo for stealing Dragon Quest characters and adding them on their Smash Bros game. What's next Solaire from Dark Souls? Gee imagine stealing that character and turning him into an amiibo.
Really interested to see how Nintendo vs PocketPair shakes out. Considering it’s a patent infringement and not copyright. Also it being in Japan makes for a unique situation. I don’t have a dog in this. Just interested to see how Japanese law works
Somebody is going to have to find a way around that "Nemesis system" patent. WB shouldn't be the only company able to use the concept of "you get to shape the villain of the story".
I used to love Nintendo… then I got tired them abusing corporate power, money, and a faulty legal system to exercise their communist values, I mean Nintendo didn’t get sued for stealing Dragon Quest’s ideas 🤔
I do not think that Sony is handling the Anniversary well at all. They should develop an easily accessible system for fans of Playstation to purchase in the look and feel of the original Playstation One. I would go so far as to say they should have bundled a classic compilation of games as part of the system. Instead, they have made a scarce item with only a handful of features and they are marketing it as a premium product that only the financially elite can purchase. Shameful.
@@jr2904 You can potentially patent any mechanic, like having a character use a sword to kill things. What if that were patented? That would be pretty bad since other devs couldn't have swords as weapons anymore, or perhaps a game where you can patent using any weapon to kill monsters. That'd mean only that company could make games that way. That's pretty slippery to me friend.
It's funny to think that now the only Dragon Ball Z game that is still considered last gen is Xenoverse 1, because Xenoverse 2, FighterZ, and DBZ Kakarot all got PS5 upgrades, and I'm sure the Xbox versions did too
@@jkd610 Nah. I'll admit, I'm one of those people who defend Nintendo for their lawsuits and C&Ss in these comment sections. But this: I will not defend. This is an egregious overreach of their power, and Nintendo knows that. Nintendo also knows that Pocket Pair has a limited amount of money, as a smaller company, and they'll go broke eventually after a long legal battle.
Casuals are the modern audience. You know, the same ones that didn't give a s**t about Hi-Fail Rush and Atro Flop but will buy the ultimate edition of the next Madden or COD. If you have casual appeal you don't give af about the whinings of gamers. That said, action rpgs are not normally a casual genre, so I don't think that Veilguard can afford that luxury.
Just a few months ago they were pretty negative on the trailer. Yep, sounds like the typical wishy washy modern audience. Pretty sure there was a lot of comments from the Spawnwave cast as well. Tomorrow should be fun.
A lot of the people at the preview event were independent TH-camrs. Some of them have even specifically called out games like Concord or Dustborn for trying to appeal to appeal to "the modern audience".
Days Gone was fantastic! I played through it on a launch PS4 with the jet engine going full blast and the framerate chugging anytime I was on the bike and it was STILL worth playing through. I would totally pick up a remastered version and throw down again on PS5 just to show the game some more love.
Other studios sell just under expectations and get shut down, and every one looses their job. Firewalk completely flops worse than almost anything ever seen, and one guy simply steps down. What a messed up world we live in.
not gonna lie, for a spit second in the video announcement yesterday, i thought we were about to get some backwards compatibility update or something to actually be able to celebrate 30 years of playstation. at this point there's more versions of the ps5 than their are games made specifically for the ps5.
Although I’m still debatin’ whether or not I want to buy the PS5 Pro [mostly ‘cause I’d like for my son to have his own and I’ll give him my current PS5], I’m absolutely gonna get that 30th anniversary DualSense.
Hey if you have the money, it won't break the bank AND you want it then might as well... we only live once. Personally I'm gonna pass, its way too expensive for me. Peace ✌
This lawsuit should not stand. Nintendo took out those patents after palworld was released. Also game mechanics should not be copyrightable. Remember Namco patenting loading screen games? No one was allowed to do it. Imagine if someone copywrote jumping? Very bad precedent if nintendo wins this one. Imagine if only one painter was allowed to use the color blue? That would suck.
I have seen many comments like this. Consider though that patents are reviewed by highly specialised people. It is not like getting an idea notarized. The ratio of approved patents to rejected ones is about 1:10000. For a patent to be approved it must have a specific and unique element that does not already exist. So any patent granted is far more likely to be worthy of protection than not.
@@nworder4life you mean like "...player character is caused to launch, in the aiming direction, an item that affects a field character disposed on a field in the virtual space,..." You realize this could apply to grenades rocks etc. Waaaaay to generalized. Is pokemon gonna sue Call of Duty for having frag grenades next? Because they could with your logic.
The only damage done to Nintendo and TPC was done by Nintendo and TPC. They release garbage games and let them carry the Nintendo umbrella. At least Palworld created a game that can run.
Nintendo has some of the most polished and beloved IPs and banger games still coming out on the Switch. Just because you don't like how corporate Nintendo does things doesn't mean that they aren't making well made games. You live in an internet bubble with the rest of the vocal minority that think saying "F Nintendo" is accomplishing something. Lol.
Lmao, keep crying, b3llend.. 50+ million copies sold combined Sw/Sh/S/V. YOU epitomize why the internet is a niche aspect of life. What you want and the TRUE world outside of the internet are 2 different things. No amount of crying about quality will change the fact Pokemon is a juggernaut. And additionally, the suit is regarding patent and copyright infringements. Nothing to do with perceived quality of the games.
Lmao, keep crying, b3llend.. 50+ million copies sold combined. YOU epitomize why the internet is a niche aspect of life. What you want and the TRUE world outside of the internet are 2 different things. No amount of crying about quality will change the fact Pokemon is a juggernaut. And additionally, the suit is regarding patent and copyright infringements. Nothing to do with perceived quality of the games.
I'd like to get the 30th anniversary controller, but the problem is Sony won't sell them in my region. You can only get them at PS Direct wich I don't have access to.
@@michaelmyersplays4992 Oh, sony's wording somehow confused me. After checking again, you're right. Let's see if they produce enough stock though. The 20th anniversary controllers were actually available for a bit, so let's hope that'll be the case this time as well.
Palworld is a clear ripoff of Pokemon, not just a game in the monster-catching genre. Even so, Nintendo wouldn't have much of a case based on anything other than software patents, which are a huge drag on innovation, and shouldn't exist. Imagine a patent on driving nails into wood with a hammer. All carpenters would have to license the patent to do their work. Many software patents are no better than this.
The game mechanics are completely different. Pokémon doesn't have crafting, base building, or gun / weapons for the player to use. Just shows you haven't played it.
@@Cyanide001 not about the game mechanics, it's about the core concept of catching monsters with a ball and releasing them to fight for you. What did Palworld even do that's worth praising? Took ideas/gameplay from different games and mashed them together.
@@nworder4life if you're talking about the lawsuit, then yes it is about game mechanics, they said PATENT infringement. Also you do realize EVERY game takes inspiration from one another to some extent, right? Palworld gave Pokemon fans what they have been asking for, who cares about taking inspiration from other games, you try to make a completely original game with no inspiration
Can't have an ass slider, can't have a chest slider, can't even have blood magic, but we get a bulge slider, top surgery scars(in a magical world btw), and non-binary options. What an absolute joke.
@@charlie1234500 Yep. People need to realize as well that the people that gave us great Bioware games of the past have long since left the company and they are Bioware in name only, like a lot of game companies.
@@crystalwater505 Obsidian, Valve, Blizzard, Rockstar Games, Bungie, CD Projekt Red, everything Sony, Maxis Studios, etc. I wouldn't even bat an eye with their shut down.
Nintendo needs wake up. They so anti consumers vs gamers, content creator, devs and the community that loves Nintendo Ip and games. Nintendo will not hesitate to sue you for saying anything that belongs to Nintendo IP. It’s not 1990 any more Nintendo. Nintendo would sue you for breathing if the had chance too. They really need loosen up. Support the Nintendo community. But we all know that never happen till somebody new in charge take over and is more of Gamer friendly, then some business guy in suit.
@@johansvensson833. even EA has walked back on that silly claim years ago. Produce a good game that looks and -plays good and there will be no complaints.
I remember a crazy patent law suit between capcom and koei tecmo. Capcom sued koei at the time for what was basically using the ability to load game data into the games system memory and then using an expansion disc afterwards. This was wild because capcom themselves had no games at the time that used this system while koei had several games that used this technology.
Nemesis system being patented is not the reason no one uses it. You can use patented systems, it's a totally normal thing in the industry, even Mordor games are built on tonnes of different patents they don't have. The reason Nemesis system is not used is because it fits like 1 out of a 1000 games, specifically open world, specifically with mini bosses assigned to location, etc, etc. And for what? So you can have ork wirh randomly assigned name mentioned thst you fight before? It's just not worth it and people overhype this feature way too much.
Yeah, it’s cool on paper, but in execution I kept running into orcs I fought before and going “Who are you again?” I think would be great in certain other games though.
I'm tired of the Dragon Ball games telling the sayan, freeza, android, cell and buu saga another time, but i think in this game we will not have this so is a good thing
I don't understand why you would use the word "Finally" in the title. It was not a foregone conclusion, and it actually seems quite juvenile on Nintendo's part. I think much less about Nintendo because of this. I doubt I'm alone.
At least Nintendo hasn't laid off thousands like the American corporations and still puts out great games. They aren't Ubisoft, EA, Microsoft is good enough for me
Lmao, Sw/Sh,S/V still sold 50+ million copies combined. Pretty sure they wouldn’t give a $hit. Also, from a neutral perspective, Palworld was trash. Clunky, empty world, repetitive and the P v P was severely lacking. Should have released the full game when it was finished instead of the beta. The hype is now dead. You hardly hear a whimper after the massive launch.
@@cbgg1585 pokemon wasn't much either when it started either and they don't play well these days either. As pal world grows it gets better and the people that made the game are indie and not a giant team. Respect the indies
None of this is petty. It’s the ugly side of business. Don’t think for a second if PocketPair was Pokemon. That they wouldn’t do the same thing. None of these entities deserve the benefit.
@@XxZannexX yet they target one when so many others do the same mechanics as they seem to preach is their own. Plus the patent being claimed in 2021 would be enough for me to say this is deliberately done to sue. It's petty end of story, Nintendo is always petty in this way and it's tiresome.
@@johntalmo3632 You realize Pokemon literally just won a case against against a Chinese developer for a mobile game called Pocket Monster Reissue. No, Pokemon is not targeting PocketPair solely. They go after anyone they think can. Again companies like these are all the same PocketPair would do the same thing if the shoe was on the other foot. Let be real here.
![Sony Announces PS1 Style PS5 Pro. | MORE PS4 Remasters On The Way.. Why? - [LTPS #640]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HyG1shVQI2I/mqdefault.jpg)
![Sony Announces PS1 Style PS5 Pro. | MORE PS4 Remasters On The Way.. Why? - [LTPS #640]](/img/tr.png)
The fact that Playstation isn't releasing just the shells for current PS5 owners is criminal. Even if the shells were marked up due to the 30th Anniversary it'd be a much easier pill to swallow.
but… that would beat the purpose of the limited edition consoles themselves no?
Yeah they suck for that
The most anti-consumer company in the history of gaming. They make EA and Activision look good.
@@stygy9929
Not necessarily. If the shells don't have "Limited Edition" etched on them, then the limited edition consoles are still limited.
The hardest pill to swallow will be the scalpers and bots. Hopefully I can get one.
The world of patents is wild.
At one point Capcom sued Koei Tecmo for infringing a patent about a controller vibrating when an enemy is near.
Too bad Koei does not have a patent for remaking a game twice, because otherwise, Capcom would be screwed in ten years.
It’s petty pathetic behavior
And at one point Nintendo stole all of its base Pokemon concepts from DQ3
Shit isn't Atari or Namco the reason most games don't have mini games during the loading screens? Remember a company patented that so why it's not common place.
FYI there are patent from Ocarion of Time.... Any idea why Nintendo has nevered used them to sue anyone??? They can't sue against copyign design as it fall under "Fan work" (They already had a case against Fan works which they lost, if you wondering what fan works it is Rule 34) - so Nintendo has no choice to use Patent to Sue Pocket pair (They took 8 months to investigate to find the best way to deal with this obivous theft)
No 30th anniversary plates for the original PS5 is a shame. Not buying their digital only consoles.
Lmao, with or without you, I think they will survive. Remember all the fake outrage surrounding the PS3 price? Yeah? Well, the PS3 still became the fastest selling console in the UK.
No amount of protest or boycotts will change a thing. There is a world outside of the internet.
Oh no! You won't buy it! I bet your 4 friends won't buy it either! Omg! Sony is bankrupt! 😱
What’s with the shills in this comment? I agree man, why can’t they just release the plates. Maybe I’ll spray my original plates to PS1 grey 😂
@@rockothetaco95fr I like Sony too but Jesus Christ yall simping for a corp because dude said he wanted plates for his console.. it’s not that serious
@rockothetaco95 right? I already have a PS5 system and 3 duelsense controllers and a portal. Nothing announced in the collection catered to me so they won't get any money from me when they would if they just release simple plates. I know the company isn't going to magicly shut down because I'm not purchasing something here but it's a shame I can't celebrate the 30th anniversary when I've been a long time Playstation fan since the beginning.
It's pretty bad that to salvage the PS5 Pro reveal disaster, all it takes is essentially retro plates and a retro themed PS dualsense... really? That meme image chart of the ups and downs of Playstation is getting crowded.
It’s crazy that those ups and downs happened all within less than two weeks haha.
@@MyManJFKTV They didn't salvage anything.
A retro theme PS5 slim/PS5 Pro Console without a disk drive, when the PS1 was the first console with one. Talk about irony.
its crazy how many haters a company has.
Nowhere near a disaster. People who want the Pro will buy the Pro, same as before the reveal.
Worth noting, Nintendo going after patent infringement means they likely had nothing to go on for copyright infringement.
Yeah there are three videos I saw that completely bypassed that and don't seem to understand the difference between copyright and patents.
This is true. It should also be noted that big corporations like Nintendo do not start fights they do not expect to win. They took most of a year to collect info and evidence. They have won every lawsuit I can recall.
@@trinity31409 Nintendo isn't invencible, they have lost cases. Nintendo vs Galoob, Nintendo vs rule34 of pokemon(ngl, that is embarrassing, to lose against furries) and I'm certain that there are others.
No one knows the future outcome.
@@alexgarnica8498they aren’t invincible either but they got an incredible track record
@@trinity31409you're half-right, but that's just the basics of big business lawsuits. The Pokémon Company likely sent their lawyers right away and lawyers usually take a long time to do anything because they want to be extremely thorough. But not always is the point to win the lawsuit, sometimes it's to send the competition a message and it waste their time and resources.
Also small detail, the Pokémon lawsuit is in JAPAN not the US. Shits not gonna be how we think
but if palworld lose in japan they will pull the game from alls stores and you can bet nintendo has the sam patent i all regions
@@johansvensson833No, that’s no the case, if they lose they’ll pay Nintendo a compensation and then they’ll settle continue distributing the game but now paying royalties to Nintendo for the patents, or they can modify the mechanics that infringe patents too. I don’t see them pulling the game or delisting it.
It's ludicrous.
Finally, someone that doesn’t pretend they know foreign legal systems
Yeah unfortunately Japan is very corrupt, hopefully Biden is willing to use Sanctions against Nintendo to force them to stop harming Americans
I find it funny how people are completely ignoring the huge amount of monster catching/training games on Nintendo console through the years, just so they run wild with their bs narrative.
Nobody knows what the patent is about, it's just speculation.
Admittedly I am a Nintendo investor, but also speaking from a legal perspective/experience, until you know all the facts and legal intricacies, how could you definitively conclude this entire case is BS?
With decent knowledge surrounding Japanese law, until they make their first court appearance, they aren’t compelled to fully and publicly release the reasonings behind why they are bringing forward a case.
You know why Nintendo left temtem and the many pokeclones out there? Despite have more mechanics similar to Pokemon?
Because at least they do have far original monster designs that Sugimori will never do.
I betcha Ken and his design team are so furios of this that Nintendo may have said "We might not be able to sue you for copying our designs but we can sue you for all things you never account. We have more than the many patent you never knew we had"
@@inamorta47-playertwistthis isn't about designs. It's a patent claim. Things like mounts and throwing items. Really vague. It's a BS lawsuit trying to bully them into a settlement
@@inamorta47-playertwist basically, the patents they're claiming apply to a huge range of games, including World of Warcraft. It's also a retroactive claim, which won't fly in the US, but will in Japan.
Let them try to sue Blizzard and see what happens. This is nothing more than a big corporation bullying an indie dev.
@@cbgg1585Ok nintendo ninja no one cares
It's insane to me that it's legal to put a patent on a gameplay mechanic as broad as
Player using creature capture device while moving in field.
It's actually not that broad IGN put out an article about the patent earlier and the infographic for the mechanic specifically shows an orb with a button as the creature capture device so basically if Palworld was even slightly original they probably could have dodged this suit.
i would recommend watching thomas game docs' video on the nintendo colopl lawsuit
basically since the 80s japanese game devs have patented very basic features to prevent patent trolling from companies outside the games industry. for example, snk had patented the title screen. these were never enforced. they've had this unofficial code of honour to not abuse patents like this. nintendo keeps up this tradition to this day. the only time in recent memory nintendo has pursued patent infringement was in said colopl lawsuit, where the company was going after other companies with patent lawsuits. it turned out nintendo had filed a patent over a decade prior that was the same thing they were suing other companies for, so they sued colopl for patent infringement.
obviously nintendo makes dumb lawsuits, and i dont like their attitude in regards to fan games and rom sites. but i also dont like pocketpair's history of blatantly ripping off other games. not even just with palworld (although it's pretty obvious with palworld), they've made other games that rip off games like breath of the wild, minecraft, hollow knight, dead cells and among us.
@@Lucarioguild7 The infographic shows an orb. But if you read the patent it doesn't specify an orb. It just states an item. Which means even if PocketPair changed it from a sphere to a cube, Nintendo can still claim ownership.
@@darryljack6612 I'm not super well versed in patent law but I'm like 90% sure the infographic is apart of the patent
@@Lucarioguild7 No, the infographic is displaying the broad nature of the patent in a visual medium. But the Actual wording itself (which is the patent) doesn't state anything about just an orb. It only (and purposely) uses the word object.
Can't wait for people to talk about Nintendo versus Palworld for about a week and then no one will talk about it again.
Same as when Palworld came out. I knew people weren't going to care about the game that much. It has some cool ideas but it felt like a Roblox game with a better style.
I hope that would be the case omg.
Well, people have lives you know.
Exactly.
you can say that about almost everything.👍👍
funny how the 30th anneversery PS5 is calling back to a console that introdused disc based gaming, on a console that doesnt have it.
It does come with a cover for the disc drive at least so when you do get a disc drive again pop it over but still it really sucks that they don't have one for the OG PS5
Did the Sega-CD not come out in 1991?
@@Planag7 doesn't matter it should come with the disc drive already...specially for the stupid premium price you already have to pay for it.
CD-i was the first optical disc based console, or if you count optional attachments it was TurboGrafx-16 with CD-ROM².
Sega CD and 3DO also released before the PlayStation.
Yeah they are the worst. Should have come with a memory card instead of an SSD too lol.
This Limited Edition PS5 Pro bundle will be like 1299€ 😮
We want to celebrate Playstation, it's just that they don't give us enough reasons to celebrate nowadays.
How? I love my Playstation now more than 30 years ago
PS5 Limited Edition announced and ppl already forgot how expensive the Pro is...
Because the price isn't a real world problem. It was just something for people to complain about for a week. Anyone actually interested in getting it aren't going to cry over the price.
@@184DadadaI dunno chief. A lot of people ARE crying over price. Look around. Outside of this channel.
The ps5 pro bundle included a DualSense and DualSense Edge so it’s going to be at least $1k
@@CarlosXPhoneonly online tho. In real life you will find the opinion is usually different. Just like here on TH-cam most seem to believe everyone wants a disc drive which is NOT true. Only 10% of gamers or less use disc
@@kennypowers1945 I'm one of those who like disc systems, but I dabble into buying games online for less than $30 MSRP. Anything beyond that? Physical. Its way too much money to pay $60 online, with no recourse - they did it to MvC2. $70 online is major YIKES.
Wish we could have gotten PS5 OG 30th anniversary plates.
Same.
Absolutely I'm thinking there might be some on the knockoff market so maybe?
How do I take a white sugar Saturn cover with a little Segata on the corner
The original ps5 isn't getting any plates. No love for us day 1 buyers
Gotta love the fact that early adopters are treated the worst in the gaming industry. Worst versions of games, least amount of support for hardware, pays the most, so on and so on.
@@MyManJFKTV exactly
@@MyManJFKTVGaming corporations has yielded me the perk of becoming debt free (Nvidia my golden goose I got in extremely early in 2015-16).
I can live with “treated the worst” as long as I still get paid. Perks of being an investor and a gamer. Win-win scenarios over the last 12-13 years in the investing space.
I've got DBrand plates on mine. I personally like the more slimmed down shape of them and they've had retro gray color ones available for years.
@@MyManJFKTVkinda seems more like a recent trend, but people still buy early so who's more at fault here the companies, and their horrible practices, or consumers, and their stupid buying habits?
Now let's see Nintendo sue -Rule 34-
Laughs in degeneracy.
Rule 34 has the best lawyers known to man. Rule 34 never loses. Rule 34 is inevitable…and Iron Man.
I believe that Nintendo sued NSFW fanart in the past.
@@Tom-yz3opyes they did, I think in one instance it had to do with the botw c&d wave they had a while. back. And a game that had a similar name to one of their older titles.
Rule 34 is known for settling and having records sealed.
They should be making way more of those PS5 consoles. Making only 12300 is just obnoxious. May was well just put scalpers on the payroll.
Maybe the scalpers already are on the payroll. Companies have bots posting as if they're real people on social media. Why not have your own scalpers "buy" their consoles and resell them for twice the price?
To anyone who is confused about the situation. This is a Patent infringement lawsuit, not a Copyright infringement like everyone thought back in the day. So this lawsuit has nothing to do with artwork or character design. Instead it involves mechanics.
The apparent mechanics in question (I could be wrong) that Nintendo has patented and are suing for are (so far)
(1) The targeting system of tossing an (not an orb) object at a creature in an overworld, like what we see in Legends Arceus.
(2) Mounting and Dismounting a flying creature in the overworld.
(3) And releasing creatures into the over world via an object.
What's even crazier is that the patent(s) was apparently refiled in May of this year which was AFTER Palworld's release. And was a month or so right before Sony and Pocketpair publicly announced a new partnership to branch Palworld into many of the same avenues of entertainment and media that Pokemon has experienced.
Honestly, I want that damn charging cable.
It sounds like Nintendo waited for Pal World to make a lot of money before pursuing them.
Probably finally had it over free updates and refusal to do p2p making them look bad.
Don't be so generous saying Concord had a dozen fans
Why would anyone feel bad about the CEO stepping down and losing his job? He fucking made Concord. lmao
People put feelings over personal responsibility these days. That's why things are so messed up now. You know, like how companies have to hire the blue-haired activists instead of the creative people because they don't want the activists to feel bad that they can't get the job based on talent.
@@G360LIVEYep, perfectly said.
Pih is Like a Dragon: Pirates in Hawaii
Rah is Rent A Hero Z
So I guess the bird got demoted to sega leaker lol
That’s quite a stretch comparison isn’t it?
@Bobo12300 yes it is but that's what Pyoro(?) said
Next: Nintendo sues Sony over using their patented throwing mechanics in MLB The Show.
Nintendo using a lot of Sony patents too, it's a normal thing in the gaming industry, every company uses someone elses patents and never gets sued unless they overstep boundaries. I guess that's what happened here. Last time someone tried to patent and ask a fee for a thing Nintendo technically owned they went nuclear on them in court.
@@TakisEnjoyer Colopl moment.
@@TakisEnjoyerglad to see someone knows their gaming history, the reason the japanese game devs even patents everything showed itself when the wiimote lawsuit happened, then colopl came and did a major stupid move, nintendo was even trying to warn them privately with 1 year negotiation period
@@rei1556 Yeah, Nintendo actually isn't one to throw out spurious and false legal accusations. They can certainly be DICKS about who they accuse and what they file suit about, but they are rarely "wrong" in the legal sense.
That would only happen if you can start catching baseball players
Nintendo just needs to make a good pokemon game
They haven’t done that in nearly a decade. I gave up on the series
Didn't Game freak make the Pokémon games?
@@modermonkula Nintendo owns the copyright, so it's still Nintendo. They could tell the Pokemon company to slow down, and Game Freak to put more resources into the games but they don't.
@@tempestnova6715 Strange since they have almost unlimited money to make a fantastic Pokémon game, yet the last few just feel so half assed and basic. The ip is trapped with a development team with as much creativity as a fifa game
@@tempestnova6715Nintendo can't tell Game freak or TPC shit about how to run the Pokemon IP, they only own 33.33% of the IP and guess who owns the other 2 thirds? You have three guesses and the first two don't count.
Spawnwave is just flat out wrong on the law. Nintendo can 100% have obtained a patent in 2021 and enforce it on PalWorld. First off, the development for PowerWorld was announced in 2021. Nothing in that implies or hints at game mechanics. They did not have any patents. Meanwhile, Nintendo's patent was for a game that came out in 2021.
On a side note, it makes perfect sense that Nintendo only recently filed suit. This is because the game only recently was actually released. Before now, it was still in beta and could have been changed to work differently.
"Sony Announces New PS5 Pro System"
Scalpers: And I took that personally...
Game play copyrights is a tough one. While I understand protecting games and their ideas to a degree, I can’t help think that overall game development takes too long and games are too infrequent within a given bracket for it to be anything but stifling for the industry.
Being able to patent a gameplay mechanic is sickening and shouldn't be allowed. How the hell does Nintendo have a patent on catching a wild animal with an item? I'm pretty sure we've been doing that for thousands of years before Nintendo existed with nets and snares.
We are not waiting for ANY WB game, ever again.
Imagine if I patented manufacturing a ball for use in games by children.
No one would be allowed to make balls but me.
Yeah, that's how patents work if you get there first
Gaming patents are the worst. If the OG game devs had patented their game mechanics then Nintendo and Pokemon wouldnt exist. No Mario games if the first person to make a platforming game patented "jumping on platforms and moving sideways in a level"
Maybe. However patents are granted for novel development. They must be new invention and distinct from previously existing things to get approved. So simple platforming would not be patentable as it was a common element in game design. It would not be unique enough.
@@trinity31409 Thats my point though. It wasnt a common element when gaming first came about. If the first person to come up with that concept patented it then we wouldnt have most of the modern gaming industry. Same applies for the first FPS game, and any other "First"
@@cjlister8508 that's business and life sometimes. Remember, Oreos are the knockoff copy version.
Everyone buying the Limited Edition PS5 Pro will all be bought by scalpers.
I bet Nintendo is going to keep this Paton suite going as long as it takes to bankrupt them.
They earned enough money that I highly doubt they'd run out of money anytime soon.
30$ per Game and only 1 month after release they already sold 15 million copies.. that are 450.000.000$
So what if they do? As long as Nintendo isn’t harmed financially and I still get paid decently as a 10+ equities Nintendo investor, then that’s what matters.
Dog eat dog world.
I don't think so, Pocketpair will probably settle to reduce losses.
@@basti__ Microsoft and Steam take 30% of each sale.
@@mrbisshie oh no.. Anyway they still made over 300 million in the first month.
What I dont understand is why are they going after palworld when there are multiple monster taming games on the switch like coromon and nexomon who both are getting new games soon. They both have same mechanics like encounter a creature and catching them in devices.
How did Sony not get that Concord was going to fail before releasing it? Surely still trying to release it has cost them a lot more...
If you ask me, I think they knew, but they didn’t realize it until that State of Play when the reception was so pisspoor.
@@MyManJFKTV But why still go ahead with it at that point? Seems wasteful.
It won't, they will write it off on their taxes as a loss.
@@RobMost - Check out what Chase Jackson typed. That’s the answer.
How? = Old out of touch white an asian dudes that dont really play games
Next, nintendo will sue all companies with electrical devices for using 'device powering' similar to them 🙄
I guess you forgot about the Wii mote lawsuits that Nintendo defended against. You people act like it's only Nintendo that patents things
Nintendo maxed out the Legal branch on their skill tree. They like flexing their build.
Meanwhile they have a 3/10 for hardware lol
@@cabb6573120+ million consoles sold.
@@cabb6573 Maybe if they stop investing so many points in Ninja...
Underrated comment
It's morally right for Nintendo to sue them 🥰🥰
I guess Sony completely forgot about all the og ps5 owners for the anniversary.
Something's wrong with that Dragon Ball game... why are there so many characters attached to the game instead of selling them individually as micro dlc? Is this 2003?
Haha they got you covered with Super 17 and OG DB characters😂
They should make the release of this 30 years anniversary over the counter at stores to avoid scalpers abusing.
$1000 is generous, no way it is less than $1199
The fact that companies can copyright systems in games is fucking disgusting.
It seems like a good use of why patents were created. It's used in all kinds business disputes exactly the same way.
So when is Square Enix going to sue Nintendo for copying Dragon Quest's designs?
Dragon Quests's designs were from Akira Toriyama brah 🤡
@@anon1692so what are you trying to say
Lmao, Nintendo does a really good job in publishing DQ in the west. Without them, we probably wouldn't have the 9th game and the 3DS remakes. Their past made it certain for the Switch success.
Dragon quest is arguably only successful due to their massive success on Nintendo machines dating back decades.
Square and Nintendo extremely tight knit. Nice try, though.. feel free to try again. 🤣
@@anon1692 They're referencing an image that has made the rounds that compares Dragon Quest monsters to Pokémon designs. It is used as some sort of gotcha, but it is just designs based on either real life insects/mammals or mythical/folklore creatures.
Yeah Square should sue Nintendo for stealing Dragon Quest characters and adding them on their Smash Bros game. What's next Solaire from Dark Souls? Gee imagine stealing that character and turning him into an amiibo.
Really interested to see how Nintendo vs PocketPair shakes out. Considering it’s a patent infringement and not copyright. Also it being in Japan makes for a unique situation. I don’t have a dog in this. Just interested to see how Japanese law works
Aw man I love Days Gone. Probably my favourite single plater zombie game of the modern era. Story was great!
Somebody is going to have to find a way around that "Nemesis system" patent. WB shouldn't be the only company able to use the concept of "you get to shape the villain of the story".
I used to love Nintendo… then I got tired them abusing corporate power, money, and a faulty legal system to exercise their communist values, I mean Nintendo didn’t get sued for stealing Dragon Quest’s ideas 🤔
You don't understand what this case even is lol
@@HoboWithAShotgun a massive corporation bullying a small indie dev because they made a successful game that has catchable monsters in it.
@@stroose yes the case is about legal bullying lol
@@stroose leave it to the lawyers
Communist values? It sounds like you have communist values
It was only a matter of time for Nintendo to suit the creators of PalWorld for infringement 😂😂
19:32 - You forgot to overlay the photo of the box for the DualSense.
I do not think that Sony is handling the Anniversary well at all. They should develop an easily accessible system for fans of Playstation to purchase in the look and feel of the original Playstation One. I would go so far as to say they should have bundled a classic compilation of games as part of the system. Instead, they have made a scarce item with only a handful of features and they are marketing it as a premium product that only the financially elite can purchase. Shameful.
Days Gone has a strong fan base. Not sure now large the fan base is. They are upset that there is no sequel.
completely ridiculous that you could patent that
Indeed. Patent laws need to be re-written. Game mechanics should never ever be able to be patented because it's a huge slippery slope.
@@crystalwater505 it's been 40 years, when do we fall off the slope? Seems like we've been fine lol
@@jr2904 You can potentially patent any mechanic, like having a character use a sword to kill things. What if that were patented? That would be pretty bad since other devs couldn't have swords as weapons anymore, or perhaps a game where you can patent using any weapon to kill monsters. That'd mean only that company could make games that way. That's pretty slippery to me friend.
The only way Sony would get Jon to buy yet another Duelsense controller is to make a GC purple variant.
Sony doing whatever it can to try and salvage the Pro's disastrous reveal.
I like how you got the important stuff out of the way first today
Same.
Dragon age: Top Scars
It's funny to think that now the only Dragon Ball Z game that is still considered last gen is Xenoverse 1, because Xenoverse 2, FighterZ, and DBZ Kakarot all got PS5 upgrades, and I'm sure the Xbox versions did too
Nintendo is breaking the gentlemens agreement to not use patents against other game studios
Days gone was so incredibly underrated.
Once again the best way to start the day and end the work week….Spawn Wave gaming news …this weekend WH 40K Space Marine 2!!
Agreed, I watch while getting my cardio in, makes my bike rides fly!
I’m not falling for that PS 5 pro thirst trap, not today Diddy!
Nintendo waited for the Microsoft Palworld exclusivity deal to expire. As soon as Palworld was announced for PlayStation they dropped the lawsuit.
Because It's morally right for Nintendo to sue them 🥰🥰
I thought the same thing
@@jkd610 Nah. I'll admit, I'm one of those people who defend Nintendo for their lawsuits and C&Ss in these comment sections. But this: I will not defend. This is an egregious overreach of their power, and Nintendo knows that. Nintendo also knows that Pocket Pair has a limited amount of money, as a smaller company, and they'll go broke eventually after a long legal battle.
Everyone was really happy to play Veilguard after getting a free trip and hotel payed by EA
Of course Dragon Age previews look good. Journalists are the modern audience.
Casuals are the modern audience. You know, the same ones that didn't give a s**t about Hi-Fail Rush and Atro Flop but will buy the ultimate edition of the next Madden or COD.
If you have casual appeal you don't give af about the whinings of gamers.
That said, action rpgs are not normally a casual genre, so I don't think that Veilguard can afford that luxury.
Soy wave 🤣
Just a few months ago they were pretty negative on the trailer. Yep, sounds like the typical wishy washy modern audience. Pretty sure there was a lot of comments from the Spawnwave cast as well. Tomorrow should be fun.
I'm just staring at the game play, and thinking, "What am I missing? This doesn't even look like Dragon Age, this looks like shit!"
A lot of the people at the preview event were independent TH-camrs. Some of them have even specifically called out games like Concord or Dustborn for trying to appeal to appeal to "the modern audience".
Days Gone was fantastic! I played through it on a launch PS4 with the jet engine going full blast and the framerate chugging anytime I was on the bike and it was STILL worth playing through. I would totally pick up a remastered version and throw down again on PS5 just to show the game some more love.
Sparking Zero looks sooo good!
Other studios sell just under expectations and get shut down, and every one looses their job. Firewalk completely flops worse than almost anything ever seen, and one guy simply steps down. What a messed up world we live in.
Too bad it wasn't the Professor that stepped down within Firewalk.
"finally" they shouldn't have in the first place
not gonna lie, for a spit second in the video announcement yesterday, i thought we were about to get some backwards compatibility update or something to actually be able to celebrate 30 years of playstation. at this point there's more versions of the ps5 than their are games made specifically for the ps5.
There are good reasons why ps3 back-compat isn't a thing yet on newer consoles.
The internets acting like Palworld was peak innovation. No one was talking about this game anymore.
Did you play it?
Everyone hates on Nintendo for how sue happy they are but once Palworld came out everyone was begging Nintendo to sue them.
Pretty sure those are different groups of people, but no one can say they're surprised right?
@@lxfenix A lot of people ar looking for excuses to pirate Nintendo games, so whenever they do something bad the feel validated
@@dvast Those people will always just have THIEF atop of their soul.
@@Lucarioguild7smart brain i see there.
Sony is getting desperate to get back the money lost from concord
Stop supporting patent trolls. I'd rather support the emulator developers.
Although I’m still debatin’ whether or not I want to buy the PS5 Pro [mostly ‘cause I’d like for my son to have his own and I’ll give him my current PS5], I’m absolutely gonna get that 30th anniversary DualSense.
DO IT. You must do it.
There's a sucker born every minute I guess.
@@Happy_Hand - Shrug.
Hey if you have the money, it won't break the bank AND you want it then might as well... we only live once. Personally I'm gonna pass, its way too expensive for me. Peace ✌
This lawsuit should not stand. Nintendo took out those patents after palworld was released.
Also game mechanics should not be copyrightable. Remember Namco patenting loading screen games? No one was allowed to do it. Imagine if someone copywrote jumping? Very bad precedent if nintendo wins this one. Imagine if only one painter was allowed to use the color blue? That would suck.
I have seen many comments like this. Consider though that patents are reviewed by highly specialised people. It is not like getting an idea notarized. The ratio of approved patents to rejected ones is about 1:10000. For a patent to be approved it must have a specific and unique element that does not already exist. So any patent granted is far more likely to be worthy of protection than not.
@@trinity31409 sure, but if you even one oppressive patent goes through, that affects everybody
@@jmillart So what? People shouldn't be making games that directly infringe upon another franchises core idea and concept.
@@nworder4life you mean like "...player character is caused to launch, in the aiming direction, an item that affects a field character disposed on a field in the virtual space,..."
You realize this could apply to grenades rocks etc. Waaaaay to generalized. Is pokemon gonna sue Call of Duty for having frag grenades next? Because they could with your logic.
The only damage done to Nintendo and TPC was done by Nintendo and TPC. They release garbage games and let them carry the Nintendo umbrella.
At least Palworld created a game that can run.
Nintendo has some of the most polished and beloved IPs and banger games still coming out on the Switch. Just because you don't like how corporate Nintendo does things doesn't mean that they aren't making well made games. You live in an internet bubble with the rest of the vocal minority that think saying "F Nintendo" is accomplishing something.
Lol.
Patenting gameplay mechanics is FUCKING LAME and contributes nothing to game industry.
They could be putting the money into suing them into a good pokemon game
Lmao, keep crying, b3llend.. 50+ million copies sold combined Sw/Sh/S/V. YOU epitomize why the internet is a niche aspect of life.
What you want and the TRUE world outside of the internet are 2 different things. No amount of crying about quality will change the fact Pokemon is a juggernaut.
And additionally, the suit is regarding patent and copyright infringements. Nothing to do with perceived quality of the games.
Lmao, keep crying, b3llend.. 50+ million copies sold combined. YOU epitomize why the internet is a niche aspect of life.
What you want and the TRUE world outside of the internet are 2 different things. No amount of crying about quality will change the fact Pokemon is a juggernaut.
And additionally, the suit is regarding patent and copyright infringements. Nothing to do with perceived quality of the games.
That'd require creativity and listening to fans.
you forgot to put the pictures of the boxes for the 30th aanniversary collection
I'd like to get the 30th anniversary controller, but the problem is Sony won't sell them in my region. You can only get them at PS Direct wich I don't have access to.
Yeah but they’ll be out in other retailers on the 26 if you don’t have direct
Walmart ect ect
@@michaelmyersplays4992 Oh, sony's wording somehow confused me. After checking again, you're right. Let's see if they produce enough stock though. The 20th anniversary controllers were actually available for a bit, so let's hope that'll be the case this time as well.
@@leonbabic7185 definitely man and I hope you get one 🙌🏾. Good luck
Didnt they give Jim Ryan a grey PS5 when he left? They already had the idea in the making last year.
I swear if they remaster Days Gone before Bloodborne I’m gonna lose it
Get over that mediocre game it was fun but nothing special
Your best chance to get a "remastered" Bloodborne is via emulation. I'm not really into souls games, so I don't really care about the remaster.
@@chasejackson7248 better than Days gone that’s for sure
Palworld is a clear ripoff of Pokemon, not just a game in the monster-catching genre. Even so, Nintendo wouldn't have much of a case based on anything other than software patents, which are a huge drag on innovation, and shouldn't exist. Imagine a patent on driving nails into wood with a hammer. All carpenters would have to license the patent to do their work. Many software patents are no better than this.
The game mechanics are completely different.
Pokémon doesn't have crafting, base building, or gun / weapons for the player to use.
Just shows you haven't played it.
Exactly.
@@Cyanide001 not about the game mechanics, it's about the core concept of catching monsters with a ball and releasing them to fight for you. What did Palworld even do that's worth praising? Took ideas/gameplay from different games and mashed them together.
@@nworder4life if you're talking about the lawsuit, then yes it is about game mechanics, they said PATENT infringement. Also you do realize EVERY game takes inspiration from one another to some extent, right? Palworld gave Pokemon fans what they have been asking for, who cares about taking inspiration from other games, you try to make a completely original game with no inspiration
Imagine the generation of kids that end up hating Nintendo for bringing down their favourite game.
I can imagine very few know about or follow all this stuff. Unless they’re glued to twitter and youtube like us instead of being normal children.
Lmao, Palworld is dead. You hear nothing about it now.
If our generation can end up hating Disney it'll be the same for Nintendo in the future. Besides they almost ruined the Mario Bros movie.
More people are probably playing Pokemon S/V right now than have played palworld the last week.
Only ancient people like you, play Palworld.
I think it's OK to copyright code but to copyright a whole battle system is bs.
Apple patented pinch to zoom on phones...
Dragon age top surgery simulator.cant wait!
In a fantasy setting Lmao
Goodbye Bioware, another shutdown well deserved 👋
Can't have an ass slider, can't have a chest slider, can't even have blood magic, but we get a bulge slider, top surgery scars(in a magical world btw), and non-binary options. What an absolute joke.
@@charlie1234500 Yep. People need to realize as well that the people that gave us great Bioware games of the past have long since left the company and they are Bioware in name only, like a lot of game companies.
@@crystalwater505 Obsidian, Valve, Blizzard, Rockstar Games, Bungie, CD Projekt Red, everything Sony, Maxis Studios, etc.
I wouldn't even bat an eye with their shut down.
Nintendo needs wake up. They so anti consumers vs gamers, content creator, devs and the community that loves Nintendo Ip and games.
Nintendo will not hesitate to sue you for saying anything that belongs to Nintendo IP. It’s not 1990 any more Nintendo. Nintendo would sue you for breathing if the had chance too. They really need loosen up. Support the Nintendo community. But we all know that never happen till somebody new in charge take over and is more of Gamer friendly, then some business guy in suit.
There is no way Bioware is back with the latest Dragon Age. You're out of your mind if you think it will break even.
then do not compain when ea say single player is dead becuse you do not support ea single players
@@johansvensson833 I won't. EA lost my support years ago with Anthem. Getting my support involves making a good game. Don't reward bad behaviour.
He'll probably play it sage and praise it at the start. Then when DA fails then he'll make a video discussing it.
@@johansvensson833. even EA has walked back on that silly claim years ago. Produce a good game that looks and -plays good and there will be no complaints.
@@johansvensson833so we should buy sht single player games games just so the industry will continue to make sht single player games?
I remember a crazy patent law suit between capcom and koei tecmo. Capcom sued koei at the time for what was basically using the ability to load game data into the games system memory and then using an expansion disc afterwards. This was wild because capcom themselves had no games at the time that used this system while koei had several games that used this technology.
Nemesis system being patented is not the reason no one uses it. You can use patented systems, it's a totally normal thing in the industry, even Mordor games are built on tonnes of different patents they don't have.
The reason Nemesis system is not used is because it fits like 1 out of a 1000 games, specifically open world, specifically with mini bosses assigned to location, etc, etc. And for what? So you can have ork wirh randomly assigned name mentioned thst you fight before? It's just not worth it and people overhype this feature way too much.
Yeah, it’s cool on paper, but in execution I kept running into orcs I fought before and going “Who are you again?” I think would be great in certain other games though.
I'm tired of the Dragon Ball games telling the sayan, freeza, android, cell and buu saga another time, but i think in this game we will not have this so is a good thing
They have story mode but there is also what ifs and plenty of other modes if not your jam.
I don't understand why you would use the word "Finally" in the title. It was not a foregone conclusion, and it actually seems quite juvenile on Nintendo's part. I think much less about Nintendo because of this. I doubt I'm alone.
At least Nintendo hasn't laid off thousands like the American corporations and still puts out great games. They aren't Ubisoft, EA, Microsoft is good enough for me
"I believe they bumped up a couple of slots"
We can literally see new slots being added in the trailer.
Dragon Age is just Concord in a rpg environment
What does this even mean?
That it blows just as hard as Concord.
Console manufacturers need to go back to coloring the buttons.. Especially since game developers still use the colored versions in game.
First party Xbox controllers still have colored letters on the face buttons usually.
@@VitalVampyr some do some don't. I have plenty that don't have colored buttons. I like the OG Xbox days where the full button was colored
You know what they could do instead of suing? Onboarding them and replacing the current Pokémon team.
Okay that is an interesting idea. They would definitely have some unique concepts to make the games better
The evil part of the 30th anniversary release is it’s the same damn day as the PS5 pro normal preorder.
that website is going so broken.
Nintendo loses my respect for this. It's petty and rude. They don't like that people can make games with monsters better than them.
Lmao, Sw/Sh,S/V still sold 50+ million copies combined. Pretty sure they wouldn’t give a $hit.
Also, from a neutral perspective, Palworld was trash. Clunky, empty world, repetitive and the P v P was severely lacking. Should have released the full game when it was finished instead of the beta.
The hype is now dead. You hardly hear a whimper after the massive launch.
@@cbgg1585 pokemon wasn't much either when it started either and they don't play well these days either. As pal world grows it gets better and the people that made the game are indie and not a giant team. Respect the indies
None of this is petty. It’s the ugly side of business. Don’t think for a second if PocketPair was Pokemon. That they wouldn’t do the same thing. None of these entities deserve the benefit.
@@XxZannexX yet they target one when so many others do the same mechanics as they seem to preach is their own. Plus the patent being claimed in 2021 would be enough for me to say this is deliberately done to sue. It's petty end of story, Nintendo is always petty in this way and it's tiresome.
@@johntalmo3632 You realize Pokemon literally just won a case against against a Chinese developer for a mobile game called Pocket Monster Reissue.
No, Pokemon is not targeting PocketPair solely. They go after anyone they think can. Again companies like these are all the same PocketPair would do the same thing if the shoe was on the other foot. Let be real here.