I recently flew on a 787-10 from EWR to LAX. Unfortunately it was't a smooth landing. I also noticed it was only about 27 minutes from 38,000 feet to landing, which seemed awful short. LAX seems to get some really fast approaches, a lot more so than NYC area airports, despite being among the busiest.
@@The757Avgeek unlike Newark, you can get parallel landings at LA, which might help speed up approaches. Felt like the pilots were waiting as long as they could before beginning descent, and it was a rapid descent at that. This was about 11-something am landing time at LAX. With my home airport of Newark it’s a single file line on approach, and usually a long approach route (notably if coming from south, holds at about 5500’ for awhile, wraps around in big hook for runway 22L). Kennedy gets some really long twisting approaches too.
I recently flew on a 787-10 from EWR to LAX. Unfortunately it was't a smooth landing. I also noticed it was only about 27 minutes from 38,000 feet to landing, which seemed awful short. LAX seems to get some really fast approaches, a lot more so than NYC area airports, despite being among the busiest.
Wow 27 minutes that is fast! I think because this flight was during a less busy time the aircraft didn’t come in as fast
@@The757Avgeek unlike Newark, you can get parallel landings at LA, which might help speed up approaches. Felt like the pilots were waiting as long as they could before beginning descent, and it was a rapid descent at that. This was about 11-something am landing time at LAX. With my home airport of Newark it’s a single file line on approach, and usually a long approach route (notably if coming from south, holds at about 5500’ for awhile, wraps around in big hook for runway 22L). Kennedy gets some really long twisting approaches too.