That's not modern, that's intentionally painted in red, and have a suggestion of probably Charles's death or something to do with death. Looks like he is in the pool of blood, pink , but blood never the less
It is common practice within Esoteric or occult circles or indeed Satanism more generally to present the casual observer with clues , pointers or indicators as to their true intent. This one is really quite stark.
In the words of Winston Churchill on unveiling his portrait by Graham Sutherland and recovering from the shock, "it's an excellent example of modern art"! That painting was never seen in public again and was destroyed by Lady Churchill herself.
@@MrBulky992Indeed! I wonder if this tripe will suffer the same ultimate fate. I'm not saying Charlie deserves anything better than this rubbish for his official portrait, btw.
It's a joke!! Absolutely hideous. The King should be the dominant feature, not the colour red. It appears to depict a scene from a horror movie. Gastly attempt with red wash... Did the artist have a melt down on the last day of painting!??
Looks like the painter was trying to make a statement that King Charles has blood on his hands. It doesn't seem like something that would be officially commissioned.
Once I was very sick, with a temperature of over 40 degrees Celsius, in great pain. On the wall of the room hung a painting, supposedly modern art with red and orange colors representing fire. I had to take it off the wall and I automatically felt better. So much for the psychological and physical impact of colors. The artist has a deranged mind, that's for sure.
The bright red color of blood actually made me feel sick, like really nauseous. Surely that's the artist's intention as well? To present the king's personality in a way that creates a state of unease for the viewer of the image. Yes, it is very modern and special indeed. But why...
Why would he want to be painted like this? Assuming the world doesn’t go up in flames in the next decade this is what his descendants will look at. What is he saying?? Its horrific.
Bright red seems weird. Especially for both the background and the outfit. Blue, green, purple, just about any color but this orangish, pinkish red. Sad.
@@elizafaulhammer2203 First of all the arrogance in your initial comment oozes Universal Credit. Secondly, I have never seen any of your work, anywhere 🙂
This American was stunned!!! all that red.... I did listen to the artist interpretation...... Yet, I immediatly thought.... and still cannot stop thinking... a hundred years from now.... what will people think of the King who embraced blood red.... and the look of Biblical Hell
A hundred years from now I hope the world knows only too well the age it emerged from. I think the red of rage and pain and suffering and paranoia, and the sheer Orwellian horror and psychosis of these last six or seven years makes the portrait quite a messenger into the future. Picasso painted 'Guernica' - not a pretty painting, by design.
Its very angry.i know art is in eye of the beholder.but there are a hell of a lot more talented painters out there that could of made this picture much more friendly.
“…Hell of a lot more painters out there…” No “pun” intended I’m sure 😝 Art is certainly in the “eye” of the beholder.. for sure.. This painting certainly looks like the artist is painting this portrait from his “eye view” of “HELL..” just look closely at the background and you will notice figures of souls crying out as if being tortured.. notice also very carefully the “eye” also in the background.. notice his black hands.. almost shouting out his role he (this royal family) played in the black slave and wind-rush movement..his hands being painted black.. all of it, very dark and very sinister.. Confucius said “signs and symbols rule the world”
Yeah. This energy is affecting a lot of world leaders right now. The artist painted his aura most likely. Which does not bode well for anyone. It's not good when people with power flash red
King Charles bathed in blood, with a monarch butterfly (MK Ultra symbolism). Considering Charles' dubious associations (WEF, Jimmy Saville, etc.) this is an interesting statement.
This portrait embedded in red is very odd. The red is a symbolic colour of communism and socialism. Red also represents blood.The Monarch butterfly on his shoulder represents transformation. Not a very impressive portrait.
The more I think about Thomas Kingston, the disappeared Catherine and now this weird painting the more I'm thinking there's something deeply wrong with the House of Windsor
That kind of butterfly is called the "Monarch Butterfly" which is common in NZ.🙄 Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and my eyes don't see the beauty of this. What i see is the DEVIL.
This is an awful picture. Shame on the painter. It looks like someone threw blood all over the portrait. You cannot even tell it's the king. When you look at portraits down the road, no one wil even know what king charles will look like. Camilla isn't going to say she doesn't like it in front of everyone. What was this artis thinking
I was a little shocked and surprised at first seeing this red portrait of King Charles at first. But, apon reflection I have grown to actually like it. A picture can say a thousand words.
Why is this woman waffling such a load of pseudo-arti-elitist BS? And this is not just very red, the red is crimson. A red hue that is translucent and also known as 'blood-red', which indicates a somewhat sinister intention of the artist.
@@rubyrose24881 No, an imperial colour is actually blue. So imperial that there was a time when commoners weren't allowed to wear anything blue. The colour is also known as 'Royal Blue' .
@@libelle8124 Blue is one royal color, but so is red and also purple. And it is purple, not blue that was reserved for Royals due to the rarity of the shell used to obtain the purple color. If you dont believe me, you can look it up.
We are at the end of days with the British Monarchy. The bloody white horse running through London and now this and Catherine is still missing . I sense a bad omen for the monarchy in near days.
This is absolutely disgusting! I would be horrified and so very offended if I was King Charles. Honestly, I wonder if he was but was gracious about his reaction. I love King Charles and this was a tremendous slap in the face to England’s King!
The portrait surely reflects the inner workings of the subject. K/Charles is very proud about his ancestor being Vlad the Impaler better known as Count Dracula. He has mentioned it in various interviews. A character of dubious morals, icy ❄️ demeanor, cruel sports (I.e., Fox Hunting, wife hater, you know - the usual), dark eyes and wrinkled forehead possibly due to worrying about angering his mom or trapping his next victim. Even the monarch butterfly is in fear of landing on him! It’s an unbelievably accurate even though not flattering, except of course for the missing sausage fingers.
It really looks like he got to the end of 100 hours of painting a portrait and accidentally spilled red paint on it so he had to make it look like it was on purpose 🙄
The portrait is revolting a blood bath.
You gotta hand it to the Saxe Coburg Unt Gotha's , they let their intentions be known.
very apt, all things considered
I wonder if it was a not-so-veiled slap.
Агрессия выливается через край полотка и заливает все пространство и людей смотрящих на эту картину.
Open your mind as well as your eyes
It looks satanic to me
Your not wrong!
Very satanic.. it almost looks unreal.. so much hidden messages
Yes. Only comment needed. These people are full of it!
It is
It looks very demonic
Worth remembering too that your king is a practicing Druid, arguably not a kick in the behind off Satanism.
And the monarch butterfly is a well-known MK Ultra symbol.
@@jamesoneill2933Druidism has nothing to do with satanism
Well, he is demonic. True to self.
He looks like evil 😈
Looks like the artist is saying "monarchy is covered in blood"
A very sly dig at monarchy
They do have alot of blood on their hands😢
He should look into the history of socialism.
I agree!
@@LordAmaltheano one is spared
Antichrist vibes.
Horrible painting not appropriate to be hung in any of the royal buildings…
Does this artist hate the king.this is the worst ever
Marlenebutler5238, it's just portraying him for what he really is a demonic entity which is what Charlie boy is as he's no king he's flatlie royals
Not so if you look with the mind and consider the challenges the king has faced
Totally the contrary this is a genius work. Great artist
He probably a fan of Princess D
Prophesy the monarch is fading away in blood
All I see is blood and hell fire.
monarch is fading away.
I'm sorry, I think it's dreadful. There is such a thing as being too modern.
I respect your opinion, but I think it's great. He's just barely emerging from the chaos of our time.
That's not modern, that's intentionally painted in red, and have a suggestion of probably Charles's death or something to do with death. Looks like he is in the pool of blood, pink , but blood never the less
Modern “art” is akin to the ‘emperors new clothes’. Idiots praise it out of fear of being socially ostracized.
.
Don’t be Sorry, It’s Horrible !
It’s quite awful, it’s really difficult to look at, gives me the creeps
I imagine his late wife would have found it appropriate
@jamesoneill2933 her? Hardly an art authority. And no angel.
Do a mirror, then turn it upside down, then you might see something that really gives you the creeps, and see it in all its brilliance!
It is common practice within Esoteric or occult circles or indeed Satanism more generally to present the casual observer with clues , pointers or indicators as to their true intent. This one is really quite stark.
Makes me feel sick to my stomach.
It's not modern. It is HIDEOUS.
Ghastly red rubbish.
In the words of Winston Churchill on unveiling his portrait by Graham Sutherland and recovering from the shock, "it's an excellent example of modern art"! That painting was never seen in public again and was destroyed by Lady Churchill herself.
@@MrBulky992Indeed! I wonder if this tripe will suffer the same ultimate fate. I'm not saying Charlie deserves anything better than this rubbish for his official portrait, btw.
Satan comes to mind.. or perhaps a portrait of a murderer. whatever...
Well yeah, killed Diana
It’s a bloody cult, pizza sause
Its demonic.
Examine think then speak
Stay true to you ❤️
@@bernardjoyce1288 then it would be worse
Duhhh 😂 Royal blood is supposed to be demonic
@@bernardjoyce1288 right back at ya
The king looks as if he is emerging from a massacre or a scene from a nightmare....Terrible self indulgence on the part of the artist....
That's probably because your a clueless sheep
It's a joke!! Absolutely hideous. The King should be the dominant feature, not the colour red. It appears to depict a scene from a horror movie. Gastly attempt with red wash...
Did the artist have a melt down on the last day of painting!??
Manhunter or Red dragon, take your pick
Show some respect for art freedom
@@kekekiki516 art is open to the freedom of interpretation. What part of that do you not understand? 🤔
Your reaction is precisely what the artist was going for, I think ❤
@@brie7705did l say somthing was unclear ?
It's so ugly. The background completely ruins the painting. The artist got what he wanted, a lot of press for himself
artist possessed to paint the demise of the monarch. Where is Kate?
I’m not superstitious but this seems like a horrible omen kind of painting…. Why isn’t the background more of a contrast to the king and his clothes?
This is the real painting of the Devil .. They are telling us all who's the Devil here !
Unfortunately, looks like his in ( HELL )
Appropiate
This is so sad. Why would the Artist do it that way. Too much Red. I feel bad for the King. It should have been Historic.
Fortunately
Anyways devil's , will creep in ( h & m ). blessed they soul . God supreme - holy maerael, fish up.
I THINK THIS Portrait needs to be behind a wall
Probably end up in the Royal bathroom, after a few months...
No disrespect meant, but it looks like the poor guy is burning in hell!!
They are just getting him prepared
No .he is coming out of it . Think pf his challenges now and past
Poor guy ? , he owns 10.3 million square miles of global land, would you care to rephrase that ...
What a ridiculous portrait! How on earth was this presented to the King!
Cause he asked for it
Reminds me of the blood flow caused by British Monarchs. Killing their own family members, wives, and innocent civilians ACROSS the world.
Yes and where is Kate???
Where is Kate Middleton?
its a mess on a plate!
Looks like the painter was trying to make a statement that King Charles has blood on his hands. It doesn't seem like something that would be officially commissioned.
It's absolutely VILE. End of ......
end of the monarch
King almost looks disembodied against that background. IMO.
may be that is the message, someone wants charles dead
Looks like the devil himself
IT LOOKS HAUNTING ...AS IF HE IS IN BETWEEN TWO WORLDS ... ADORNED WITH THE ILLUMINATY MONARCH BUTTERFLY ...
🎯 🎯
The artist illustrated what he thinks of him.
Once I was very sick, with a temperature of over 40 degrees Celsius, in great pain. On the wall of the room hung a painting, supposedly modern art with red and orange colors representing fire. I had to take it off the wall and I automatically felt better. So much for the psychological and physical impact of colors. The artist has a deranged mind, that's for sure.
That is for sure!! I see him shady and sinister.
Or portraying shady and sinister?
The bright red color of blood actually made me feel sick, like really nauseous. Surely that's the artist's intention as well? To present the king's personality in a way that creates a state of unease for the viewer of the image. Yes, it is very modern and special indeed. But why...
Agree. Makes me feel anxious and nauseated.
Dreadful painting. I suspect the artist is against the monarchy. 🤮
This is disgusting and a waste of public money how dare KC believe this is public money well spent, during austerity.I agree its demonic.
Every time I see it I think its saying devil to me its horrible
Truer than you could ever imagine.
I just saw on Twitter what the portrait reveals when two of them are put together in mirror-image. Scary!!
@@poppysunflower8736 where can I see that please.
@@jamesoneill2933Benny Johnson shows it
The truth is horrible
It's demonic and hideous
The painting represent how bloody those fake kings and queens are !!!
Why would he want to be painted like this? Assuming the world doesn’t go up in flames in the next decade this is what his descendants will look at. What is he saying?? Its horrific.
Bright red seems weird. Especially for both the background and the outfit. Blue, green, purple, just about any color but this orangish, pinkish red. Sad.
It's crimson. A translucent hue, also known as blood-red.
How would YOU know? Are you an expert? Do you know anything about art?
@@elizafaulhammer2203 Do you?
@@libelle8124 Certainly, I have a degree in Art History, run an Art Gallery and am a painter, with exhibitions, so....?
@@elizafaulhammer2203 First of all the arrogance in your initial comment oozes Universal Credit. Secondly, I have never seen any of your work, anywhere 🙂
This American was stunned!!! all that red.... I did listen to the artist interpretation...... Yet, I immediatly thought.... and still cannot stop thinking... a hundred years from now.... what will people think of the King who embraced blood red.... and the look of Biblical Hell
A hundred years from now I hope the world knows only too well the age it emerged from. I think the red of rage and pain and suffering and paranoia, and the sheer Orwellian horror and psychosis of these last six or seven years makes the portrait quite a messenger into the future. Picasso painted 'Guernica' - not a pretty painting, by design.
@@wewhofly My word... you have given me something to think about... bravo!!! YES... I can see what you are saying... thanks
Is it for Davos Headquarters?
lol
That portrait looks horrible 😮😱.
Sack the artist its a disgrace.
The artist’s insight is very odd.
Its very angry.i know art is in eye of the beholder.but there are a hell of a lot more talented painters out there that could of made this picture much more friendly.
“…Hell of a lot more painters out there…” No “pun” intended I’m sure 😝
Art is certainly in the “eye” of the beholder.. for sure..
This painting certainly looks like the artist is painting this portrait from his “eye view” of “HELL..”
just look closely at the background and you will notice figures of souls crying out as if being tortured.. notice also very carefully the “eye” also in the background.. notice his black hands.. almost shouting out his role he (this royal family) played in the black slave and wind-rush movement..his hands being painted black.. all of it, very dark and very sinister..
Confucius said “signs and symbols rule the world”
this is not art, this is sometng demonic and painted intentionally in red
Vivid imagination or you're just mad, why does everything come back to the slave trade...what AFRICA started btw
I now see why Harry left with his family. The spiritual atmosphere is red.
if it was of Harry, it would be blank... like his brain...
Yeah. This energy is affecting a lot of world leaders right now. The artist painted his aura most likely. Which does not bode well for anyone. It's not good when people with power flash red
Charles should have painted a self portrait. This carbuncle is a bloody mess. It looks like Freddy Krueger coming through the wall.
totally evil
King Charles bathed in blood, with a monarch butterfly (MK Ultra symbolism). Considering Charles' dubious associations (WEF, Jimmy Saville, etc.) this is an interesting statement.
Very true.
Too awful!!!
Can barely look at it!
It looks like he's in Hell.
This artist is known for this type of portrait, his explanation of why it was painted this way is worth reading.
Yes I’m sure they knew what they were getting. I actually like it.
I don’t need that hack tell not to believe my eyes
This portrait embedded in red is very odd. The red is a symbolic colour of communism and socialism. Red also represents blood.The Monarch butterfly on his shoulder represents transformation. Not a very impressive portrait.
The more I think about Thomas Kingston, the disappeared Catherine and now this weird painting the more I'm thinking there's something deeply wrong with the House of Windsor
Awful painting. Looks like he is covered with blood. It’s his legacy and he has to live with it.
Dante's Inferno.
Words fail me watching that person twitter on like a fart in a bottle.
That kind of butterfly is called the "Monarch Butterfly" which is common in NZ.🙄
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and my eyes don't see the beauty of this. What i see is the DEVIL.
Why is everyone so afraid of saying "Good God, that's awful!"?
Reminds me of The Anti-Christ
Bingo cuz that’s who he is
It looks like he is in Hell. He does not have that much hair.
I'm sorry, but that portrait is just downright STRANGE.
It's something one would see in a horror movie, where the dark character goes from Prince of darkness to King of Hades - right, metamorphosis
AWFUL
This is an awful picture. Shame on the painter. It looks like someone threw blood all over the portrait. You cannot even tell it's the king. When you look at portraits down the road, no one wil even know what king charles will look like. Camilla isn't going to say she doesn't like it in front of everyone. What was this artis thinking
Well, there's so many photographs of Prince Charles
😨This is the perfect Monty Python Portrait of the King! Honestly! I just can't stop laughing!😂
Fashion of the time of evil paintings in blood butterfly mk ultra
Very appropriate. It's just missing W.E.F written on it.
Ladies and gents. Let me present to you the devil.
If bloody hell was a painting
Scary.
I was a little shocked and surprised at first seeing this red portrait of King Charles at first. But, apon reflection I have grown to actually like it. A picture can say a thousand words.
It sure does. It says MK Ultra.
To me it reminds me of a man coming out of a blood mist. Very disturbing.
Very much like a portrait of a bloody warrior to scare the enemy
Well it's a strange thing, does anyone know what the artist was going for?
In terms of garnering attention I would declare this portrait as highly successful.
And the woman on ITV news last night was gawping over it like it's the best thing since sliced bread🙄 talk about an overreaction
Jimmy Savile's best friend showing his true colours.
Don’t forget the photo of Prince Philip with all the Monarch Butterflies
It’s horrible what an absolute insult I hope no money was spent on it. Put it in a dark cupboard somewhere until it can be burnt.
The blood soaked portrait, very apt. NMK. Abolishthemonarchy
Why is this woman waffling such a load of pseudo-arti-elitist BS? And this is not just very red, the red is crimson. A red hue that is translucent and also known as 'blood-red', which indicates a somewhat sinister intention of the artist.
I agree
Or the subject.
Red is an Imperial color.
@@rubyrose24881 No, an imperial colour is actually blue. So imperial that there was a time when commoners weren't allowed to wear anything blue. The colour is also known as 'Royal Blue' .
@@libelle8124 Blue is one royal color, but so is red and also purple. And it is purple, not blue that was reserved for Royals due to the rarity of the shell used to obtain the purple color. If you dont believe me, you can look it up.
We are at the end of days with the British Monarchy. The bloody white horse running through London and now this and Catherine is still missing . I sense a bad omen for the monarchy in near days.
reality can no longer be denied 😂
It will be always OUTSIDE PEOPLE who will safe the king from ABSURDITY😮
Horrible and his skin color looks sick. All those beautiful old portraits and then this!
This is absolutely disgusting! I would be horrified and so very offended if I was King Charles. Honestly, I wonder if he was but was gracious about his reaction. I love King Charles and this was a tremendous slap in the face to England’s King!
King going to hell what a nasty piece of work shows how cruel king
It is horrible. Looks like he is burning up before your eyes.
It's demonic.
child sacrificed blood for paint. The devil does not hide anymore
I think it’s horrible like the antichrist
Missing his horns, but overall portrait is matching with the symbols in his coat of arms.
eight million from taxpayers for this ????
No please don't tell me that's true 😮
" I REVERE ISLAM AND INTEND TO BE KING OF ALL THE FAITHS." Traitor King Charles ( Feb 2023) 😢
@marilynwillett804 He's too far up his own jaxie to repent, so we're lumbered with his treachery until cancer works it's magic.
The portrait surely reflects the inner workings of the subject. K/Charles is very proud about his ancestor being Vlad the Impaler better known as Count Dracula. He has mentioned it in various interviews. A character of dubious morals, icy ❄️ demeanor, cruel sports (I.e., Fox Hunting, wife hater, you know - the usual), dark eyes and wrinkled forehead possibly due to worrying about angering his mom or trapping his next victim. Even the monarch butterfly is in fear of landing on him! It’s an unbelievably accurate even though not flattering, except of course for the missing sausage fingers.
where are the horns?
It really looks like he got to the end of 100 hours of painting a portrait and accidentally spilled red paint on it so he had to make it look like it was on purpose 🙄
No way does Charlie Like THAT !!
It is the most disgusting thing I've ever seen. This is an official state portrait not a piece of abstract modern art to be interpreted.
It's absolutely horrendous and should never be seen again. Doesn't someone look at these things before they are unveiled?