Schmidt EasyFlow 9000 vs. Parker Gel
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 มี.ค. 2017
- Created with Wondershare Filmora. For further reading, also check out Matt Morse's great review article here: www.nibandink.com/pens/2015/8/...
UPDATE: I have had occasional skipping and globbing with the EasyFlow 9000. But these are rare and I still consider it a very good pen. The Parker Gel has never had these problems. - แนวปฏิบัติและการใช้ชีวิต
This was amazingly helpful! Thank you! I am looking for a gel refill for my Caran d’Ache 849, and I think I have it now. Thanks again!
I’ve been using the easyflow 9000 for a while now and I love the refills but I find myself accidentally smearing the ink all the time. These Parker gel refills look very similar and I love the fact that they are more smudge resistant, will have to give these refills a try. Thanks for the video!
I agree with Rylai Crestfall, what were you thinking with that logo.
I have just gotten into writing with Parker pens, and I find that the easyflow 9000 M in blue (the only color I tried it in) is very inconsistent writer. It could write perfectly for a page or two, and then starts skipping on me. I have found a number of reviews on the amazon saying the same thing. Perhaps there is a quality control issue there?
Move that damn logo! Sheesh
Good review! I'm new to a refillable pen user. I got a nice pen for my birthday with this refill and I would like to know what does the 3 digit number at the base of the refill mean?
One's a ballpoint, the other's a gel pen.
Had to dislike, that logo is too disruptive. Should've increased transparency of that.
same here.
I wish there were no watermark or logo at all.
Weird, I didn't even notice until these guys complained because I was focused on the subject matter 😊 Excellent video and demonstration thank you. Are these 2 ink refills the same size (i.e., can I use a Parker in pens that's explicitly list the easyflow 9000?) Keep up the great work!
the parker dries very quick, maybe the quickest from other gell refill. im ok with the logo as long as u watch and listen the review lol
I use the same exact two refills in the same pen. In my experience the Parker Gel looks nicer on paper. It's a little thicker and more saturated. However, the writing experience with the 9000 is noticeably superior. It's smoother than the Parker and a pleasure to write with, making it my favorite at the moment.
move the stupid logo
whats with the watermark? must be amateur hour.
Is someone doing dishes in the background?
Whats with the logo blocking the video, what the heck?
ok - great logo! - as far as the inks....try the parker gel on white-out, or proper gloss-tags etc - not magazine paper.
Yt should have denied your vid.
thanks for the video.
Stop floating the logo and maybe I can see your presentation.
All I saw was Filmora, cya.
На видео какие-то буквы
A bought a package of Parker gel refills from Office Depot. Not one wrote. I did like another brand of gel refills that had a “ceramic ball” which worked well.
Agree with other comments that the logo (watermark?) is too intrusive.
So many whiney babies in the comments. I was able to see everything just fine even with the logo present. Maybe instead of complaining about a free review from someone who went out and spent the money on both... Get your cheap asses in the store and test them for yourselves. Great review.
Couldn’t see anything with that terrible logo should redo this video after removing it all together such a terrible idea I now officially hate filmora whatever that is lol!
Watermark.... All I'll say otherwise informative vid
Omfg why do you have that giant ass logo right in the way the entire video? I don't know how you ever thought that was going to be a good idea. Baffling
LOL. Way to ruin a video with a giant, obscuring, watermark type logo. I couldn't even finish watching. "Created with Wondershare Filmora". No kidding :)
maybe if you took that BIG ASS LOGO out of the center of the video, we might be able to see better