These are great tips. I especially like Tip #2 on "channel presets". I have a lot of regular singers at my karaoke shows, and their voices need the same EQ every time they come up to sing, so by storing/loading their individual EQ settings as presets every time they come up, I can quickly dial-in their mic even if it's the same mic channel.
Wow excellent tips! Is there a way to do mix-minus for zoom calls or remote guest on a show? Is there a way to duplicate mainLR to outputs including post-AMM?
Thank you very much Sir. Can you please help with limiter & compression settings for a preacher. My mic sound chopped all the time. Thank you very much
Absolutely fantastic content sir. ❤ would you recommend this or the Yamaha DM3? I will be using it for studio, multi track, recording, and gigs. I can learn to live without the physical faders. I'll be curious to know your thoughts on that. Thanks again for the content!🎉
Hi, just looking at the reviews online, I think for multitrack recording and studio work both mixers are amazing and offer the same or similar digital features. However, for gigging I would probably lean towards the DM3 as the physical faders make setting fader levels much easier and more intuitive. The other aspect to consider is portability, and although both mixers are very compact, the CQ18T is much more portable. Between the CQ18T and the DM3: If you're going to be doing a lot of live mixing, I'd definitely go for the DM3. But if you're looking for something more affordable and compact, the CQ18T is the way to go. Hope that helps...
@@crosslylucas😊 Thanks sir! I ended up buying the CQ-18t on the basis of sound and portability. I already have an MG16XU and the boomy sound is noticeable between it and the allen and heath stuff. Sampling lots of online stuff it is consistent into that DM3 line. I would say the sound difference is similar to a Mackie vs QSC Boom boom dance or boom boom smooth/clean.
Hi, I think the CQ18T is good if you're looking for a versatile and compact digital mixer. The DM3 is heavier but useful for live shows as it has physical faders. The built in plugins of the CQ mixers are very versatile, and it seems like the DM3 has similar plugins. But the main difference is the physical faders (and the price).
Dude, Allen & Heath needs to hire you or send you a fat check!!!
Another brilliant video - thank you! You’re very talented.
These are great tips. I especially like Tip #2 on "channel presets". I have a lot of regular singers at my karaoke shows, and their voices need the same EQ every time they come up to sing, so by storing/loading their individual EQ settings as presets every time they come up, I can quickly dial-in their mic even if it's the same mic channel.
Wow excellent tips!
Is there a way to do mix-minus for zoom calls or remote guest on a show?
Is there a way to duplicate mainLR to outputs including post-AMM?
You can do a mix minus using the AUX Outputs paired in Stereo.
Not sure about duplicating the main LR with post AMM engaged...
@crosslylucas I did a test last night. And noticed that when AMM is engaged, is also affects the outputs 1-6, it's great, I'm happy with this mixer
Thank you very much Sir. Can you please help with limiter & compression settings for a preacher. My mic sound chopped all the time. Thank you very much
On it!
Appreciated my good Sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Absolutely fantastic content sir. ❤
would you recommend this or the Yamaha DM3?
I will be using it for studio, multi track, recording, and gigs.
I can learn to live without the physical faders.
I'll be curious to know your thoughts on that.
Thanks again for the content!🎉
Hi, just looking at the reviews online, I think for multitrack recording and studio work both mixers are amazing and offer the same or similar digital features. However, for gigging I would probably lean towards the DM3 as the physical faders make setting fader levels much easier and more intuitive. The other aspect to consider is portability, and although both mixers are very compact, the CQ18T is much more portable.
Between the CQ18T and the DM3: If you're going to be doing a lot of live mixing, I'd definitely go for the DM3. But if you're looking for something more affordable and compact, the CQ18T is the way to go.
Hope that helps...
@@crosslylucas😊
Thanks sir!
I ended up buying the CQ-18t on the basis of sound and portability.
I already have an MG16XU and the boomy sound is noticeable between it and the allen and heath stuff.
Sampling lots of online stuff it is consistent into that DM3 line.
I would say the sound difference is similar to a Mackie vs QSC
Boom boom dance or boom boom smooth/clean.
With custom layer, can you have FOH channels on the same page as a monitor/iem channel?
@@shaunpreston893 Hi, yes this can be done very easily.
hi, which is better a&h CQ18 vs yamaha dm3 ? and what are the differences and what about in built plugins which are bettter?
Hi, I think the CQ18T is good if you're looking for a versatile and compact digital mixer. The DM3 is heavier but useful for live shows as it has physical faders. The built in plugins of the CQ mixers are very versatile, and it seems like the DM3 has similar plugins. But the main difference is the physical faders (and the price).