Indian RAFALE vs Chengdu- J-20: A Brief Look | Aerodynamic Vs Stealth Vs Avionics

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 พ.ย. 2024
  • Rafale is a very capable 4.5 generation fighter and simple way of explaining what is a 4.5 generation fighter? , it is 5th generation minus stealth. Rafale posses special stealth features , Rafale posses something very unique in 4+ gen fighters it has active stealth - i.e it doesnt posses stealth characteritics naturally like an F 22 or an F 35 but achieves stealth by other means it acquires stealth by radar cancellation . Rafale has rcs of 1.25m^2 for compariosn typhoon has rcs of 1m^2 and Su 35 has rcs of 2m^2 but when rafale uses its Spectra EW suite its rcs is said to become as low as 0.06m^2 for comparision rcs of F35 is o.o1m^2 and rcs of 0.06 is quite stealthier than official rcs of Russian Sukhoi T 50 ( 0.5 to 0.1m^2) a new system called DEDRIA which is under deveploment will reduce rcs of rafale even more.
    ===================================================
    WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN
    Most of the pictures clip or BGM included in the Video Belongs to their Respected Owners and we do not claims rights...but under this👇 we are using them 🙏
    ===================================================
    DISCLAIMER: UNDER SECTION 107 OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT 1976, ALLOWANCE IS MADE FOR "FAIR USE" FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM, COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING, SCHOLARSHIP, AND RESEARCH. FAIR USE IS A USE PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT STATUTE THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE BE INFRINGING. NON-PROFIT, EDUCATIONAL OR PERSONAL USE TIPS THE BALANCE IN FAVOR OF FAIR USE.
    Facebook ► / indiatubedesk
    Twitter ► / indiatubedesk
    ˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍ
    SOURCE► #DefenceDecode
    ====================================================
    THANKS FOR WATCHING,
    PLEASE LIKE SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE TO THE DEFENCE DECODE
    ====================================================

ความคิดเห็น • 292

  • @defencedecodeOfficial
    @defencedecodeOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Lets add one more point J-20s were using LUNEBERG-LENSE, so whats changes ?
    max you can reduce the RCS is 0.01m2
    .
    If you are claiming to have a RCS of below that, then why you need to import a 5th gen fighter?
    or for that matter why you are developing a jet matching to that RCS(0.001)J-31 as someone already pointed out...So IF RCS is 0.01 nothing changes for S-400 as far as locking on RAFALE is concern that scenario has already been explained.

    • @krishnachaitanya8590
      @krishnachaitanya8590 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Make a video on Tejas Vs J20!! Kindly 🙏🏽

    • @MrSunilal
      @MrSunilal 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Very good and nice work.
      Q. Why is not be Su30MKI able to find J20 such a long distance because of Radar reflector was in ON position.
      Ref: th-cam.com/video/GqHCYG6tx2M/w-d-xo.html

    • @yourmathtutor5217
      @yourmathtutor5217 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrSunilal last year j20 was detected......

    • @mukeshkushwaha1621
      @mukeshkushwaha1621 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      BhSir Aur X-RAY VISION ko count nahi kiya

    • @AbdulRehman-tq6dx
      @AbdulRehman-tq6dx 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      respect from PAKISTAN

  • @aopashhono5524
    @aopashhono5524 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    yeah ,first I admit what I said is really true. My father is a senior engineer working for PLAAF , and my interest is aircraft too, I am studying aerospace engineering in a famous university of china. My dad told me some details of J20 And next H20 that both of them are propagandized to be stealth aircrafts exactly. But as far as I know, these are not really complete, actually J20 and H 20 are not perfectly stealth, and the Engines of them are both not match the demandings of PLAAF, I only say these on youtube, I dare not to do that in China mainland social media, bcz of the reality of China aircraft products. I think India will be a superpower soon, bcz the average age of india population is 27 which china is 37, this is the very crucial advantage for india to surpass china in the nearly future. And INdia have better relationship with western countries , india doesnt trap in the trade war with any other countries. the trade war makes china economy hurt heavily basically, just bcz china gov dont publish the real data of them to india ,indian now can imagine how tough the life in china is. I think india will be the leader of world in 2030, india military are strong too, all of the qualities which china copied from other weapons are under the real level of original one, so PLA's equipments just are shown to make our chinese feel safe, I said im honest and bcz of my dad, i can know some information about the real situation. I admire the demoratic india, what a great country with long history and active economy, professinal army. just move forward ,india! 超级大国阿三加油哦!

  • @uphaarprasad6980
    @uphaarprasad6980 5 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Finally... I was waiting for this video, since you created that poll. Superb work. Keep it up 👌👌

    • @defencedecodeOfficial
      @defencedecodeOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thats what i Promised.."Comparison beyond just Specification"

  • @anindyamukhopadhyay8
    @anindyamukhopadhyay8 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    What an analysis
    awesome
    Very important discussion regarding actual specifications and some actual could be possible senarios
    Thanks for the great work

  • @souravsadhukhan2487
    @souravsadhukhan2487 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You are the best youtuber of defence related topics....The kind of depth knowledge you have in defence is truly remarkable....Hats off to you.....Keep going like this and make us rich in knowledge.....

  • @dipayandatta7207
    @dipayandatta7207 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Awesome comparison 👍. It's brief and to the point. Keep it up 👍

  • @Vishal_Kothari27
    @Vishal_Kothari27 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Though they might have 0.1m2 RCS value...but we have to praise china for what they have made....yes we might not have big threat from J20 due to S400 and rafale....but they are not our products...this are exported from russia and france...we have to become self reliant😕

    • @abhijnansaha811
      @abhijnansaha811 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      J 20 design is also copied from USA

    • @akashchoudhary6619
      @akashchoudhary6619 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      J20 Ka Sab Russia aur US SE copied hai.

    • @sh2939
      @sh2939 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@abhijnansaha811 stealth k liye ek particular geometric shape chahiye hota h isiliye saare 5th generation planes ek hi design k hote h... AMCA b f 22 Raptor k jesa h

    • @subhajitsikdar6184
      @subhajitsikdar6184 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Vishal kothari it's wrong tht we r nt self reliant....we r making all defence equipments nd in next 5yrs we will b fullt self reliant.....we made akash nd prithvi defence system which r nt as advanced as s400 bt we hve made it...in tht way too we hve made tejas nd tejas mk2 will b made which will b as advanced as rafale
      ...

    • @akashchoudhary6619
      @akashchoudhary6619 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Uhh rebuy don't need to copy bastard, copied products are anyway worse than the original

  • @SG003
    @SG003 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally ageya video. Thank you Amit bhai. Bohot samay se is video ke liye request kar raha tha

    • @Amitraaz
      @Amitraaz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤗

  • @prashantrajput5897
    @prashantrajput5897 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Well explained ... please one comparison between su 57 vs f35

  • @PrimoPete
    @PrimoPete 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Kai logon ka maanana hai ki jab Su-30MKI ne J-20 ko detect kiya tha tab J-20 mein Luneburg lens use ho raha tha. Training ke waqt F-22 aur F-35 bhi Luneberg lens use karte hain taaaki baaki agressor ya defender fighters stealth fighter ko detect kar sakke.

    • @learner6721
      @learner6721 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      china is not flying j-20 in tibet according to reports.it may be other mysterious jet.because they to have ground radar and awacs which can detect the presence of su-30mki

  • @KnowledgeEnthusiast
    @KnowledgeEnthusiast 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amit sir, I've Serious massive doubts about s400 coz everyone now a days is making over exaggerated claims & statements of their weapons only to sell the weapons by influencing with specs & techs....INDIA should NOT over trust on single type & single vendor military product, instead we need to trust our own indigenous weapons & missile defense system of our own Made in India. #JaiHind #VandeMatram.

  • @ujjwalshrotryia8402
    @ujjwalshrotryia8402 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bhai what is DEDRIA which you wrote in description of the video.....I didn't found any mention of that on google....

  • @ashishbalid3779
    @ashishbalid3779 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Knowledge is awesome .I am glad to hear that. India has become tougher country and it will be not easy for china to trouble India.

  • @soumyasagar7168
    @soumyasagar7168 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do a comparison between jf17 block 3 and tejas mk1a
    With technical aspects like ,aoa ,turn radius. No of bvr carrying capacity. .radar range ..rcs .... electronic s

  • @MrRonnymangang11
    @MrRonnymangang11 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Care to upload video comparison between Rafale future F4 standard vs J20? India's main concern is the lack of numbers. Chinese home made J20 will enjoy numerical advantage. Hope our will be upgraded SU30MKI can supplement Rafale....

  • @debd8
    @debd8 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    J-20 luneberg lens use kar raha tha shayad jab IAF be Tawang regiion se track kiya tha. Actual RCS abhi kaha nahi ja sakta hai.
    Ek aur baat PL-15 Meteor jaisa high maneuvering target killer nahi hai balki wo mehez ek AWACS ya Tanker jaise high value target killer hi hai. Asli threat to PL-21 hai jisme Meteor jaisa Ramjet diya gaya hai. BVR battle mein Rafale ka palla bhari hai agar wo sach mein J-20 ko pehle track kar leta hai to.

    • @vinayakzanjad7894
      @vinayakzanjad7894 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bro astra mk 3 200 km range rakhta hai aur ramjet technology hai

  • @ronin5878
    @ronin5878 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Finally! Thanks alot Amit bhai. 🙏👍

    • @Amitraaz
      @Amitraaz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      🙏

  • @anuragsingh7480
    @anuragsingh7480 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    DETAILED analysis!!! Well done

  • @pksatapathy1368
    @pksatapathy1368 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    what an excellent comparison.You have a strategic bend of mind besides being through in technical matters , congrats. With S 400 , both country have a huge disadvantage to use these platforms. Zamming S 400 is not an easy option , and it can be handled as it comes. Just in case such situation arise, the major fight will be in BVR range and there IAF can easily find a solution. After all Chinese fighter jets are yet to prove battle worthiness in real fight situation. In the mean while IAF must focus on a 6th generation craft within next 10 to 15 years.

  • @nasirzamirzamirhussain4717
    @nasirzamirzamirhussain4717 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    India ky fighter jet TH-cam ma bht acha perform krte hain but field ma zameen par girte hain 🙄
    The tea was fantastic☕ 👌

  • @biswabhusanrath5357
    @biswabhusanrath5357 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    J 20 carries weapon internally where as Rafael externally .so,don't forget additional wind drag on plane.

  • @adi7260
    @adi7260 5 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Chinese maal kabaad hoga🤣🤣😂🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @imransardar6189
      @imransardar6189 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Tu jis phone ce comment karrahahein o china ne banaia

    • @adi7260
      @adi7260 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@imransardar6189 aare aare aare mai nokia use karta hoon jo ki made in Vietnam hai😏...lekin mere ek dost ka chinese maal 1yr mai hi screen bleeding start hogaya😛😛🤪

    • @ronpits3744
      @ronpits3744 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      ADITYA NARAYAN KAR but made in china made in India se 10000 times zayada behtar hai
      India ki quality China se bhi zayada ghatiya hai maine dekhaa hai

    • @alone_mask
      @alone_mask 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@imransardar6189 China Tera pappa hai bhadve

    • @MuhammadBilal-ml8id
      @MuhammadBilal-ml8id 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Google PL-15

  • @rikkimalik7354
    @rikkimalik7354 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This is alarming call for india.
    Hyperloop train, faltu ke karche ko bnd or AMCA ko fund kro jldi.

    • @MathhackAssam
      @MathhackAssam 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hyperloop se atcha hr city pe metro banao and train 18 laya Jaye.

    • @anshulsingh8326
      @anshulsingh8326 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MathhackAssam Hyperloop Indian government fund ni karta Virgin kar raha

    • @RaXiUs007
      @RaXiUs007 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bhai existing rail ko modernise karo public will be more than happy

  • @Gaurav-bp8ho
    @Gaurav-bp8ho 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We must focus on our indigenous fighter jets productions

  • @tp4398
    @tp4398 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Rafael 4++ generation
    J 20 5th generation.
    So do happy.

  • @rahulkochar1784
    @rahulkochar1784 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please make a video on how good is Tejas in comparison to other aircrafts.

  • @AKS-qq1fw
    @AKS-qq1fw 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amit ji you are superb. Best defence channel.

    • @Amitraaz
      @Amitraaz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤗

  • @mr_pawar_3
    @mr_pawar_3 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kitana hard work lagta hoga yar tumhe ye sab data ikkata karne me. Great bhai love you👏👏👏👏😍

  • @shubh_nx777
    @shubh_nx777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am here again, this time, just to laugh at that "chengdu" name. 😂😂😂
    Chengdu j20, sounds hilarious af 😂😂😂
    Good explanation as always though

  • @Value_Pilgrim
    @Value_Pilgrim 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have an idea for a 7th Generation Aeroweapon. Which leapfrogs the 6th Generation Fighter which everyone in the world is talking about today.
    I hope India starts a parallel track to AMCA focusing on the 7th Gen. Most of the tech are already mastered by India. A few will need to be learnt

  • @rishenchatterjee41
    @rishenchatterjee41 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Detailed analysis. Well done my friend.

  • @NJJZWQ
    @NJJZWQ 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Strategic Fooyou Agency sent a congratulatory message to this video 。Great Video.

  • @yourmathtutor5217
    @yourmathtutor5217 5 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    In dog fight Rafael can counter easily j20......

    • @humungous09
      @humungous09 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @yehoutube But how, J-20 neither have stealth nor credible BVR missiles..

    • @NJJZWQ
      @NJJZWQ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@humungous09 100% agree with you

    • @NJJZWQ
      @NJJZWQ 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@yehoutube
      This match
      the video of Strategic Fooyou Agency needs to continue to spread.

    • @flaminmongrel6955
      @flaminmongrel6955 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @luke wilson why?

    • @humungous09
      @humungous09 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Ajay Singh Do they have credible BVR missiles In a one on one fight to crush Indian jets? What about electronic counter measures and jamming pods that Indian jets carry?
      Is it that easy?

  • @sawanrathaur7549
    @sawanrathaur7549 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow amazing video brother

  • @devyasingh1745
    @devyasingh1745 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have heard rafale can supercruise without using after burners

  • @bmsra79
    @bmsra79 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is a huge difference in RCS values for a wartime fully loaded Rafale v/s the base RCS specs published by Dassault. The RCS, Speed, Maneuverability, Max Ceiling are all impacted by weapons load. Without going into actual capabilities during wartime, planning is done based on stated specs. If the specs are at least 80% true, then India has a problem. With Air defenses activated on Chinese side, Rafale can be quite easily tracked by ground based radar due to 1+ meter RCS. You are comparing a 4th and 5th gen aircraft based on your understanding and assumptions, which seems quite amateur.

  • @lovelykumar7913
    @lovelykumar7913 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    सही आदमी को subscribe किया है। Thanks Amit

    • @Amitraaz
      @Amitraaz 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      🤗

  • @mahmoodshaikh2606
    @mahmoodshaikh2606 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What's the no escape zone of PL21 which J20 & J31 use to carry in their internal Bay & they are 6 in numbers each ?

  • @vasu0806
    @vasu0806 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Gr8 info...best tech analysis

  • @anangpal72
    @anangpal72 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent, brother.
    Going good. Keep it up...

  • @kamalbhullar5035
    @kamalbhullar5035 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Best comparison video I have ever seen

  • @kuberjohari4097
    @kuberjohari4097 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    bro what about LUNEBERG-LENSE.......may be j20 using that

  • @tusharujjenwal2621
    @tusharujjenwal2621 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    best comparison video

  • @ranjitsinghsingh6915
    @ranjitsinghsingh6915 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bahut accha comparison

  • @sayandbnath
    @sayandbnath 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any kind of engagement would only be BVR. WVR era is long gone. IAF should always strive to develop its BVR capabilities. Even S400 would not be enough because in future new bvr aam and agm missiles are going to be inducted

  • @pradyumnapatra1356
    @pradyumnapatra1356 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very good research.... 👍👍👍

  • @VijayGupta-cg8wq
    @VijayGupta-cg8wq 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    sir x guard kya hai iske baare me video banaye

  • @rx_mohitshukla8173
    @rx_mohitshukla8173 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    China fighters jet J20 is not fifth generation copy by f35 body

    • @MathhackAssam
      @MathhackAssam 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same J-31 must be copied version of F-22 with failed engine

  • @avisupergaming3074
    @avisupergaming3074 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    But china will have more then 36 j20.....quantity itself is a quality....secondly they just need a better missle then meteor.....their plateform is ready....amca should be in mission mode now

    • @MathhackAssam
      @MathhackAssam 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ya isliye MMRCA 2.0 main Rafale hi select Hoga,India is preparing for China not Porkistan.

  • @Red_Vulture
    @Red_Vulture 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hard work.

  • @wikystar318
    @wikystar318 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    जिसका पायलट होशियार और जाबाज है , वहीं जीतेगा ,, पाकिस्तान के F16 को हमारे 50 साल पुराने मिग ने मार गिराया था ,, और अभिनंदन से भी खतरनाक 2000 पायलट हमारे पास है ,, जय हिन्द 🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @just_a_curious_thinker
    @just_a_curious_thinker 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Plzzz make a video on Su-57 vs F-35 vs F-22 raptor

  • @supratimsaha596
    @supratimsaha596 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent video.

    • @Amitraaz
      @Amitraaz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      🙏

  • @amitSingh-je8vh
    @amitSingh-je8vh 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Knowledgeable information good job
    Keep it up

  • @karankaran2067
    @karankaran2067 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bhai please make a comperision video on amca and j20

  • @neelamtrivedi5867
    @neelamtrivedi5867 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bhai S- 400 , Japan ke side hai aur agar hota bhi to koi growler aur brahmos se urra denga

  • @mayanksagar633
    @mayanksagar633 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Rafale rcs is less than 0.5ms²

  • @Komol7strikeagle
    @Komol7strikeagle 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir Energy waste hotahe nahin kehtehe energy bleed hotahe.... BVR condition me bleed kehtehe Jai Hind Nice Video.... Very informative

    • @gouravparida91
      @gouravparida91 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dono same cheez hai.

    • @Komol7strikeagle
      @Komol7strikeagle 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      In which condition.... Words n terms are made to use precisely... Apke hisapse toh kuch b bola jasaktahe Lol....

  • @vivanranjan261
    @vivanranjan261 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    make a video on ins vishal there are many misconceptions about its design(hms queen elizabeth/flat top nimitz design), propulsion, fighters to be carried etcn

  • @yashrajbajpai3779
    @yashrajbajpai3779 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir apne sahi Mamle me comparison kiya he baki sab to google se utha ke range, hardpoints jaise specifications or pics dikhadete hein

    • @Amitraaz
      @Amitraaz 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      🤗

  • @NorthWest23
    @NorthWest23 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kya j20 ko India ka aad system or xrsam detect nahi kr skta ??

    • @MathhackAssam
      @MathhackAssam 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      China ese hi hamla nhi kr Sakta,agar hamla Kiya toh bohot jordar Karna parega.Assam,Arunachal Pradesh main already Brahmos missile tenad hain

  • @usmanijaz5998
    @usmanijaz5998 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    No skip zone 60 km ha meteor ka correct ur information

  • @learningmadeezzy808
    @learningmadeezzy808 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yaar lekin Chinese ke paas bhi to S400 hai to unhe bhi ti uske flaws pata honge.... Aur abhi abhi news aai thi ki S400 F35 ko detect nahi kar paya tha

    • @MathhackAssam
      @MathhackAssam 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nhi us S-400 ke pass Pura radar system nhi tha,Indian version main 3 different radar system ayega S-400 ke sath.Besevi Israel jam Karne main atcha hain.Syria main to Israeli F-35 ko S-300 me mar giraya tha last year

    • @vinayakzanjad7894
      @vinayakzanjad7894 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      F35 bohot advance jet hai bhai

  • @AmarinderSingh2228
    @AmarinderSingh2228 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Compare J20 with Tejas/LCA not with Rafale

  • @yourmathtutor5217
    @yourmathtutor5217 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superbbbbb bhai

  • @abhilash3931
    @abhilash3931 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Superb video bro

  • @bebyfun
    @bebyfun 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Barak 8 ka elta MF Star redar j20 ko track kr pyga..

  • @djangounchained1839
    @djangounchained1839 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are such a genius expert

  • @dattahalkatte8272
    @dattahalkatte8272 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very very nice video

  • @sudipbanerjee03
    @sudipbanerjee03 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mm but what we are ignoring is, Rafael is not Indian.. It's imported. And J20 is made indigenously in China.. So that can stand 20 J20 in front of 1 Rafael.. Then?
    So, economically, financially and technologically, China is at least 25 years ahead of us. So India should focus on retaining bright minds and focus on Indigenously development like bramhos. Technology transfer.. at any cost.
    Compete with China and rise above 370, RAM janmabhimi..etc.

  • @sureshkumar-lb4sj
    @sureshkumar-lb4sj 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gajab bhai maja aa gaya

  • @ambastha09
    @ambastha09 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can Brahmos be deployed on Rafael?

    • @meetjobanputra5476
      @meetjobanputra5476 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes not current version but brahmos ng which can deployed in tejas mk2 and rafele

    • @vinayakzanjad7894
      @vinayakzanjad7894 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Brhamos next veriant will be aplyed even on tejas

  • @ambastha09
    @ambastha09 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very informative keep it up👍

  • @jijogorgeraj
    @jijogorgeraj 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good comparison

  • @ritwiksharan4045
    @ritwiksharan4045 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb video....

  • @primastudy2221
    @primastudy2221 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    कुछ भी हो, भारतिय पायलट्स के पास अनुभव ज्यादा है ।

  • @barunlala4302
    @barunlala4302 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are great.

  • @ahirvaibhav1856
    @ahirvaibhav1856 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bhai aapp to compression series bnavo aapp ki compression series best he

    • @Amitraaz
      @Amitraaz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      🙏

  • @monarajawat6804
    @monarajawat6804 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    J20 Much superior bt RAFALE have MBDA meteor.

  • @abhishekagrawal1699
    @abhishekagrawal1699 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mje aj tak smj ni aya ki canard k bad bhi j20 stealthy kese h

  • @ranjeetshinde4330
    @ranjeetshinde4330 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video

  • @yourmathtutor5217
    @yourmathtutor5217 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rafael is multi role fighter india must go 114 Rafael f4 models with Indian customizations agreement......

  • @junaidmalik9593
    @junaidmalik9593 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bhai video to acha tha but technical knowledge samaj ni aeai

  • @adityarajput-dr2sw
    @adityarajput-dr2sw 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Isko bolate depth knowledge

  • @Vishalwaghmare-mf2xe
    @Vishalwaghmare-mf2xe 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bhai aapke video se pahle ek ad aai ho thi uska naam h satellite Shankar movie ka bhai pura dekha india army jo h jaan h hamari me har skip kr dena hu pr ye nhi kr paya jaan h hamari jaan

  • @aswinottapilavil495
    @aswinottapilavil495 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You make great videos but I think your analysis is far too liberal and a bit too optimistic. For example,
    1. You are calculating the RCS of J-20 completely of an IAF claim (not saying IAF is lying). But there was a various speculation about this and one of the most important one is that J-20 might’ve been using radar reflectors ( it’s common for stealth aircrafts to use it in peacetime exercises so that other aircrafts and ground stations could easily keep track of it). Radar RCS is one of the most classified secrets in the world and I don’t think we shouldn’t take it from an IAF claim. From the airframe design the 0.001 m2 claimed by China isn’t too far fetched (frontal stealth).
    2. Canards doesn’t necessarily compromise frontal stealth, there are ways to mitigate that. NASA’s X-36 is a good example. Flight controls can also designed to mitigate keep the radar reflections down from a canard.
    3. The NEZ is a variable just like the max range of a missile is( for example, just cos PL-15 has a 200-300 km range doesn’t meant it’s going to be able to successfully reach all targets at that distance), the 130 km NEZ isn’t something meteor can achieve against a highly maneuvering target like J-20 (it’s probably against non-manoeuvring test targets they used, actually NEZ are often kept a secret). Realistically it would be close to 60-70 kms at best.
    4. From the size of the nose, it’s very unlikely that it’s radar capability is limited to 300 kms. That seems too short for such a large air-superiority fighter, it’s most likely around 400 km similar to F-22 or Su-57 otherwise it will be in a major disadvantage against something like an F-22 (or Su-57 but such a confrontation is unlikely).
    Just some suggestions and opinions. Good work and keep up.

    • @defencedecodeOfficial
      @defencedecodeOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I dont talk in Air...
      1. that 0.001 RCS with a Dihedral angle in canard is impossible i could ave easily taken that without any dihedral angle, Let them claim what ever they want.
      2. I never said the canard is compromising RCS but the dihedral
      3. about NEZ, i have clearly written in the BOX that 130+ NEZ is in ideal condition its no claim its an official statement let me put a link here
      Official claim th-cam.com/video/xYEZnBGPMnI/w-d-xo.html
      and Sir about IAF claim, I would rather trust my air force than a enemy country

    • @aswinottapilavil495
      @aswinottapilavil495 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Defence Decode Even with that dihedral canard it can still achieve an RCS beyond the 0.1 m2 we calculated in the video right. It’s very hard to precisely calculate its RCS without more knowledge as far as I know, but sure you may know more.
      And about the NEZ, I said it primarily because of the scenario you mentioned with a Rafale vs J-20 confrontation. So to maximise the chance of a kill the Rafale will need to get much closer to a J-20 (60-70 kms). Which would be quite risky against a fighter like J-20 which can detect and even engage Rafale at a much further distance. So, Rafale will have a better kill chance if got that close but J-20 will be able to engage Rafale far more (just confirming if that’s how you meant it).
      Well, I never claimed that IAF lied, and I believe my countries airforce as well. But again, if J-20 were using Radar reflectors then won’t that automatically make IAF’s claim kinda unreliable?
      Anyway, my intention is not to prove you wrong but to clear my doubts and understanding more.
      If possible can you give me some sources/links to something that discusses about the effects on stealth by anhedral and dihedral canard configurations?.

    • @aswinottapilavil495
      @aswinottapilavil495 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anurag K Menon Going closer put you into the NEZ which would maximise the chance of a kill. It guarantees that the missile you fired will reach your target no matter what.

    • @aswinottapilavil495
      @aswinottapilavil495 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Defence Decode Another question and this may be stupid. Does the canard always has to be in dihedral configuration? Shifting it a 0 degree while in a stealth oriented mission and then switching back to the dihedral configuration when max performance is required is something that can’t be achieved?

    • @aswinottapilavil495
      @aswinottapilavil495 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anurag K Menon A no escape zone is the region in which your missile is guaranteed to reach its target and not to guaranteed to get a kill.
      And secondly, the target is also very important. A missile with 160 km range means it can hit a target at 160 km in the most ideal scenario, with enough altitude and without any mid way corrections. Against a nimble manoeuvering target it will drastically reduce. Same goes for no escape zone, it varies a lot according to the target. Against a fighter it will be around 60-70 kms ( this is still a ridiculous high number for a NEZ) but a J-20 will always detect a Rafale first and with its longer ranges missile put the Rafale in a disadvantage.

  • @surjandevdwal8081
    @surjandevdwal8081 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    India or chaina ki airforce ki dogfight का video bnavo plz

  • @kaminak9236
    @kaminak9236 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rafael vs j31 ka compare kro

  • @shabbirahmed7039
    @shabbirahmed7039 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sab say important baat india will depend on France while China can buid J20 by themselves

  • @bijukarunakaran6256
    @bijukarunakaran6256 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    When real war happens even ww2 planes are enough,only skill pilot is required,we should have more no: of planes also, like Mig 29, or less but cover must be given by 4 generations, fight with 3 & 4 generations plane,will win the war,

  • @neerajmishra1394
    @neerajmishra1394 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nyc analysis

  • @vivekchhabra5353
    @vivekchhabra5353 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thnkx for urs work

    • @Amitraaz
      @Amitraaz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤗

  • @ruchenbarua5572
    @ruchenbarua5572 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    2 points.. One., The pilot's skill... Second., French make vs Chinese..

  • @saffronsword9683
    @saffronsword9683 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Delete Kyu ho Gaya tha

  • @amerasia5189
    @amerasia5189 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    india should purchase gripen instead of rafale

  • @sandeepmahajan3556
    @sandeepmahajan3556 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can rafale perform cobra ??

  • @jamesmani5985
    @jamesmani5985 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rafael is Highly Combat tested prooved fighter J20 still not tested

  • @lyfmobile4882
    @lyfmobile4882 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The 1st one who enter the enemy zone definitely loose their plane

  • @avs6362
    @avs6362 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    China has developed some defence technology specially Missile technology but China can't make a good fighter jet. China keeps begging Russia for advanced avionics and Fighter Jet engines.

  • @Mr.rakeshsaha
    @Mr.rakeshsaha 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great vdo .. same vdo again ! Kya sir g pehla wala vdo kaha gya !..

    • @defencedecodeOfficial
      @defencedecodeOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Are logo ki complaint thi Tawang ke galat pronunciation pe so usko correct kr k re-up kia hai

    • @Mr.rakeshsaha
      @Mr.rakeshsaha 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@defencedecodeOfficial oh.. ok ok..
      Ek cheez bataye , agaar GE404 k jagas EJ200 use hota toh tehas mk1a bettar capability nahi lata..

    • @defencedecodeOfficial
      @defencedecodeOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tejas Mk-1A ke lie yes Mk-2 ke lie no

    • @Mr.rakeshsaha
      @Mr.rakeshsaha 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@defencedecodeOfficial mk 2 k liye koi 110 + kn ka engine best rahega. Qki mirage 2000 95 kn engine use karta hai , and mirage 2000 ka under belly wohat smooth hai mat lav drag nahi hai and air intake bhi alag hai .. jab ki tejas main asa nahi hai .. tejas ka intake below wing hai RCS ko ghata ne k liye and under belly bhi busy design hai. Toh GE414 epe yeh, EJ 20*0 rahe ga jo 110kn plus deta hai .. choose toh ADA ko karna hai.