This mock trial had to be held in England because no American broadcast networks would air it. The documentary series The Men Who Killed Kennedy was first aired by the BBC in 1988, but the American audience didn’t see it until 1993, when it was shown on the A&E Network. We can thank the British media for giving us valuable information that was concealed by the American media and the government.
mr von pein, while i do not agree with your personal theories & ideas in the assassination of the president, i do appreciate the work you've put forth in maintaining the video evidence. thank you, sir.
He saw the President extend himself out. Kennedy straightened out and went way back over the seat. I think this is what he saw when he referred to "standing up".
@@HistoricalWonder720 People like you cant have it both ways One witness says they heard one thing but others say something else but their words are unreliable but the witness you and the flipping WC like are reliable.
Says the same person who happily accuses decorated police officers of being accessories in murder and treason with zero evidence, and to heck with the pain it causes their families.
@@davidharper1152 No, I just see value in alerting people when they are being misled by crackpots so paranoid they assume anybody not on board for this conspiracy idiocy must be a "CIA agent." Oh, and, presumably, you are standing up proudly and saying you ARE on board for accusing decorated police officers of being conspirators without evidence or any concern for the pain such irresponsible words cause their families, yes? That's a pretty contemptible attitude, don't you agree?
Don't pay attention to Aaraonz the chief WR Apologist on TH-cam. He is not here to learn who killed Oswald. He is here to make sure you don't learn, and don't listen to the talk about "decorated officers." He routinely disparages a decorated Detective who was murdered telling the truth about the assassination..
after watching this i can see why pain is in trouble she met them she took them to her house she got job she had gun she speaks russian,she remind him president in town tomorrow,she has allot to answer i like her but i be thinking the same thing.
Some of the witnesses got caught up in the spotlight and embellished what they actually saw. Notice that the defense didn't call Jean Hill ? Even William Newman added more to what he actually saw. The prosecution would have destroyed Jean Hill if she testified.
warren commission didnt even call the Newmans and bill who was 10 feet away from the kill shot because he said it came from the Knoll. We also know oswald was an intelligence agent, passed the parfin test on the face, his tax returns are still sealed as it would show he worked for the agencies, he worked for Guy Bannister summer 63 when Ruth Paine (family cia, sister cia, dad CIA, husband Bell hellicopter) set him up with the job and then planted all the evidence sent from family friend Dulles. Jim Garrison even asked her "Didnt you know your sister worked for the CIA" and she said she only knew it was a gov't job, In 1963, people didnt associate with KNOWN communist woman and at that time, a russian defector even though we now Know he was a false defector on a gov't program and was not a communist. She would risk all those family working for the gov't issues, the fact her husband was michael FORBES Paine, and new stepdad was the founder of Bell Hellicopter, just to learn russian. Learn your facts.
this is a eye opener, if Oswald was there he would walk right out of the court, funny how everone said he wanted to be famous,and actually he wanted to be incognito
nantucketjeep he wanted to be incognito except for when "he" was raising hell in New Orleans & beating on the doors in Mexico City. doesn't it seem like he was 2 different people?interesting, no?
I wonder why if we have actual interviews with people from 1963 why they could not have just been used. Obviously over time Mr. Newman has had time to polish his testimony. The news reels that we have now, where these available at the time of this Mock Trial? I have trouble taking this whole trial as totally serious in trying to come to a conclusion at all.
NEWMAN SAID SHOTS CAME FROM BEHIND HIM AND HE COVERED HIS CHILDREN, BUT LOOKING AT THE PHOTO HE HAS THE BABY IN FRONT OF HIM AND UPRIGHT BETWEEN HIMSELF AND THE PLACE WHERE HE SAID THE SHOTS CAME FROM !!!
From Newmans description the shooter would have caused massive blow out of JFK left side of head . That didn’t happen . The third shot came from the place where the other 2 shots happened. The TSBD . Newman is a nice man would in reality didn’t know where the shots came from .
Thanks for the upload but what is Mr. Newman talking about? Kennedy is looking into the crowd at the time is head is blown off? I don't think so dude. Has this poor fellow even seen the film?
Big E That’s not at all what he said. He spoke of the president looking and gazing around BEDORE being shot. That’s completely consistent with existing footage. He is easily seen smiling, waving, and making a great deal of eye contact with the Dallas crowd.
I would think by then Mr. Newman would have learned to say JFK THREW his arms up, and not THROWED his arms up. Also, someone Throwed a firecracker.!! Come on Bill, that's third grade. I notice that Newman can not tell the exact same story every time. JFK stood up. JFK fell ACROSS the car and onto Jackie's lap. NO WAY. As far as the Z film anyway. To me, FELL ACROSS THE CAR sounds like he fell across the trunk. JFK got nowhere near Jackie's lap on that first move. She got up.! Also said, JFK's head was moving looking all over the croud... NO WAY.!! Right after the throat shot he WAS NOT looking over the crowd.!! Come on Mr. Newman, tell the real story.!!
This mock trial had to be held in England because no American broadcast networks would air it. The documentary series The Men Who Killed Kennedy was first aired by the BBC in 1988, but the American audience didn’t see it until 1993, when it was shown on the A&E Network. We can thank the British media for giving us valuable information that was concealed by the American media and the government.
mr von pein, while i do not agree with your personal theories & ideas in the assassination of the president, i do appreciate the work you've put forth in maintaining the video evidence. thank you, sir.
He saw the President extend himself out. Kennedy straightened out and went way back over the seat. I think this is what he saw when he referred to "standing up".
With how close he was and with cow gruesome the assassination was a very much doubt he would ever forget what he saw, I know I wouldn’t forget that.
Eyewitness testimony is the most unreliable kind ever. You can have 10 people watch the same thing and you will get 10 different stories
@@HistoricalWonder720 People like you cant have it both ways One witness says they heard one thing but others say something else but their words are unreliable but the witness you and the flipping WC like are reliable.
Which is why Howard Brennan’s testimony that he saw “Oswald” in the window is worthless.
William Newman knew EXACTLY what happened there that day... Him and everyone else these that day... He's got guts...
Says the same person who happily accuses decorated police officers of being accessories in murder and treason with zero evidence, and to heck with the pain it causes their families.
@@aaronz7056 CIA Agent Aaron again.....
@@davidharper1152 No, I just see value in alerting people when they are being misled by crackpots so paranoid they assume anybody not on board for this conspiracy idiocy must be a "CIA agent." Oh, and, presumably, you are standing up proudly and saying you ARE on board for accusing decorated police officers of being conspirators without evidence or any concern for the pain such irresponsible words cause their families, yes? That's a pretty contemptible attitude, don't you agree?
Don't pay attention to Aaraonz the chief WR Apologist on TH-cam. He is not here to learn who killed Oswald. He is here to make sure you don't learn, and don't listen to the talk about "decorated officers." He routinely disparages a decorated Detective who was murdered telling the truth about the assassination..
after watching this i can see why pain is in trouble she met them she took them to her house she got job she had gun she speaks russian,she remind him president in town tomorrow,she has allot to answer i like her but i be thinking the same thing.
Ever heard of syntax
@@TNT-km2egShazam.
3:51 marks nowhere near the picket fence but the other side of the pergola and behind that is the depository.
It is possible that there were three volleys of shots, some so close together they sounded like one shot.
Ahhh, no.
Many witnesses have said two shots came in rapid succession . NOT possible with the bolt action POS found on that day.
@@Ronbo710 Exactly.
The Secret Service agent in the front right seat described “a flurry of bullets coming into the car.”
@@Ronbo710 Victims' reactions in the Zapruder film alone clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds with several seconds between each.
Some of the witnesses got caught up in the spotlight and embellished what they actually saw. Notice that the defense didn't call Jean Hill ? Even William Newman added more to what he actually saw. The prosecution would have destroyed Jean Hill if she testified.
warren commission didnt even call the Newmans and bill who was 10 feet away from the kill shot because he said it came from the Knoll. We also know oswald was an intelligence agent, passed the parfin test on the face, his tax returns are still sealed as it would show he worked for the agencies, he worked for Guy Bannister summer 63 when Ruth Paine (family cia, sister cia, dad CIA, husband Bell hellicopter) set him up with the job and then planted all the evidence sent from family friend Dulles. Jim Garrison even asked her "Didnt you know your sister worked for the CIA" and she said she only knew it was a gov't job, In 1963, people didnt associate with KNOWN communist woman and at that time, a russian defector even though we now Know he was a false defector on a gov't program and was not a communist. She would risk all those family working for the gov't issues, the fact her husband was michael FORBES Paine, and new stepdad was the founder of Bell Hellicopter, just to learn russian. Learn your facts.
@@dl9229LMAO "learn your facts"😂😂😂😂 Where'd you learn your "facts"?
When did this mock trial take place?
1986... England
this is a eye opener, if Oswald was there he would walk right out of the court, funny how everone said he wanted to be famous,and actually he wanted to be incognito
nantucketjeep he wanted to be incognito except for when "he" was raising hell in New Orleans & beating on the doors in Mexico City. doesn't it seem like he was 2 different people?interesting, no?
Texas Tech University was my law school.
I wonder why if we have actual interviews with people from 1963 why they could not have just been used. Obviously over time Mr. Newman has had time to polish his testimony. The news reels that we have now, where these available at the time of this Mock Trial? I have trouble taking this whole trial as totally serious in trying to come to a conclusion at all.
NEWMAN SAID SHOTS CAME FROM BEHIND HIM AND HE COVERED HIS CHILDREN, BUT LOOKING AT THE PHOTO HE HAS THE BABY IN FRONT OF HIM AND UPRIGHT BETWEEN HIMSELF AND THE PLACE WHERE HE SAID THE SHOTS CAME FROM !!!
He didn't do a very good job shielding his boy from the direction of the shots.
Do you know where he was standing?
@@81overon about three yards behind JFK when the third shot hit.
You are judging what he did in minutes by a photo that captured only a Millisecond.. Please!!
But he did say that a shot came from behind him which wasn't the Dallas book depository so then Oswald didn't fire that shot ! Oswald was framed.
From Newmans description the shooter would have caused massive blow out of JFK left side of head . That didn’t happen . The third shot came from the place where the other 2 shots happened. The TSBD . Newman is a nice man would in reality didn’t know where the shots came from .
Why was this trial in london
so all could have a working vacstion
@@justme62791 did they get paid for this?
Pretty sure you would not mistake the direction of the report
Is like to see this done again with a
l the new evidence
Me too. Lee would still be guilty as hell but it would be SO much easier to prove with the advance in technology and ballistics.
Thanks for the upload but what is Mr. Newman talking about? Kennedy is looking into the crowd at the time is head is blown off? I don't think so dude. Has this poor fellow even seen the film?
Big E That’s not at all what he said. He spoke of the president looking and gazing around BEDORE being shot. That’s completely consistent with existing footage. He is easily seen smiling, waving, and making a great deal of eye contact with the Dallas crowd.
Proving once again that the Zapruder Film has been Doctored, not that the Witnesses are wrong!!
@@ENDTIMEsVideoLibrary give it up. You sound ridiculous
@@franclin0 Yes, I agree.. You sound ridiculous.
@@franclin0 The Zapruder Film has been edited, altered, and animated. th-cam.com/video/XCigDMyHisE/w-d-xo.html
No way he heard Jackie say that. No. Way.
WAY!!!
GET OUT! Nope. He didn’t hear her. Sorry.
Convenient that they can have a fake trial for Oswald after he was assassinated by Ruby.
This man heard miss Kennedy? Lol ummmm ok
I would think by then Mr. Newman would have learned to say JFK THREW his arms up, and not THROWED his arms up. Also, someone Throwed a firecracker.!! Come on Bill, that's third grade. I notice that Newman can not tell the exact same story every time. JFK stood up. JFK fell ACROSS the car and onto Jackie's lap. NO WAY. As far as the Z film anyway. To me, FELL ACROSS THE CAR sounds like he fell across the trunk. JFK got nowhere near Jackie's lap on that first move. She got up.! Also said, JFK's head was moving looking all over the croud... NO WAY.!! Right after the throat shot he WAS NOT looking over the crowd.!! Come on Mr. Newman, tell the real story.!!
Lol
He is