This gambit is really nice but I much prefer using the Vienna to get a similar position, saccing a knight in a 4 knights game seems tedious to me. Very nice video though
what if instead of knight back to g8, black just leave that knight and develop the bishop (maybe to b4 pinning the knight to the king). if white pawn takes knight on f6, queen takes the pawn. that would be a good position for black I think, to pieces developed + queen threatening f2 and d4. Not sure if I miss something here, but allowing white take the knight back on f6 looks better than retreat to g8.
You have a very strong pawn structure and taking it with en passant will make that pawn structure doubled meaning you basically ruined the whole point of kicking knights around. This also allows the knight to go to f6.
This gambit is really nice but I much prefer using the Vienna to get a similar position, saccing a knight in a 4 knights game seems tedious to me. Very nice video though
what if instead of knight back to g8, black just leave that knight and develop the bishop (maybe to b4 pinning the knight to the king). if white pawn takes knight on f6, queen takes the pawn. that would be a good position for black I think, to pieces developed + queen threatening f2 and d4. Not sure if I miss something here, but allowing white take the knight back on f6 looks better than retreat to g8.
Very helpful! Thank you!
❤️ Thanks.
nice vid
@9:41
Why not take the PAWN with en passant?
What am I missing?
You have a very strong pawn structure and taking it with en passant will make that pawn structure doubled meaning you basically ruined the whole point of kicking knights around. This also allows the knight to go to f6.
en passant is a terrible move there
10:15 what about en passant
You give all your space and black is winning
@@georgechatzopoulos8911 but its en passant ):
@@BloodSugar7 lol
Enpassant is forced.
@BloodSugar7 you must be under 1000
noooo en passant 😭