He merely said the Prophet has higher status than MIAW. If you disagree than you're a Disbeliever. It's worrying that you seem to be objecting to this.
What is the point then? That he 'disrespects scholars'? If you think its disrespect to say that the Prophet's status is higher than an overrated 'scholar' like MIAW, than I am afraid, you should review your Iman and come out clearly and declare that you are an apostate. His pamphlet is not a work of scholarship. And it most certainly is not required for guidance. If you believe that it is, there is no difference between those that follow the Talmud over the Torah and the followers of Ibn Abdul Wahhab.
@@muhammadkhan7051 then you have not read MIAW books. As Usool ath Thalatha is ayaat and ahadith. So you're sating ayaat and ahadith are wrong, check your Iman dear brother. Re-read Shahadah, how can you insult Allah and His Rasool Sallallahu Alayhi Wassallam. How can you raise the Prophet Sallallahu Alayhi Wassallam above Allah. This is Christian methodology.
@@ExtremeShez The Book of Allah is the Quran. How can you suggest that the book authored by MIAW is the work of Allah? You are a Jaahil, if not an outright Disbeliever. This in itself is Judeo-Christian.
Absolutely my brother... You're completely correct. If we humble ourselves and study the correct books of aqeedah, we will not feel the need to praise or view any other ideology or belief system above our blessed deen
@@TheRockeyAllen it's got everything to do with what you saying what are you talking about? He dismisses the Sunnah for his own way and this is where it's lead him.
@@TheRockeyAllen i mean giving dawah on "i think" "in my opinion" "according to this philosophy" is not a problem? Ahlussumna wal jamaa don't go agaist the consenses of the scholars. Doesn't mean only early scholars also present time scholars. They're all agreed upon miaw was among the best authors about tawheed. And he's out if his arrogance denouncing him. Not even for some writing mistakes were taken out abou miaw
@Ahmad Kafi From what I can understand, no one here is denying the importance of the contributions of Sh MIAW. The only contention is with layman people who make it seem as though Islam is incomplete without those contributions. (Hence, the usage of the word "need")
Subhan'Allah, lets not forget Al-Wahhab is one of the beautiful Names of Allah. This stigma "wahhabism" is propagated by the West, it's a shame the Ummah is perpetuating this. Imam Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, May Allah have Mercy on him, reminded the Ummah about Tawheed, let's be sincere and ask Allah for Guidance and the Straight Path in His Deen, Al-Islam.
Mohamed Abdalwahab was a tool by the British empire and he was not known for being a sheikh. His father was a sheikh. He died 230 years ago and his ugly pictures are still available on the enternet. His brother Suleiman said he crossed the line and became kufr.
Well put Faris, this is exactly what I was thinking these past few months about these pseudo preachers 🙏🏻 Islam is a peaceful religion and simple to understand if we follow the right path of the Ullema, but unfortunately this mentioned group is making it hard and suffocating and their followers even more. May Allah guide them to the right path 🙏🏻
@One True Path I feel like most people didn't even k ow about this . Right now because of tate people who may be interested in Islam may be put off seeing this drama
@@lilacblue783 We are not discouraged anyone, hidayah is from Allah. Refuting deviant is actually show's how Islam is unique and better than others religion.
@3ABO - Do you know saajid and shamsi and many others condemned Halloween in and out of Saudi for weeks, some salafis for years, you can disagree with them and be wrong but no need to misrepresent or be dishonest.
I guess what hijab meant is that it is not crucial for the preservation of aqidah that you can have an alternative for it. Think about hadith books for example, we have bukhari's book that Allah made it a crucial step in the preservation of the prophet’s traditions, meanwhile some other books are not as crucial. And as far as I know we have tens of other aqidah books that were produced during the Era of the emergence of other misguided sects and produced by people of the first three centuries (salaf). Such books are (I hope you can read the titles in Arabic) : 1- الإيمان (by abdulqasim ibn Salam, died 234 h) 2-الإيمان( by abu bakr ibn abi shaibah, died 235 h) 3-أصول السنه(Ahmad ibn hanbl, died 241 h) 4-خلق أفعال العباد(bukhari, died 256 h) 5-شرح السنه (barbahri, died 329 h) 6-شرح أصول اعتقاد اهل السنه والجماعه. (Lalak'i, died 418 h) And tens of other salaf's aqidah books. May Allah bless those imams and mohammed ibn abdulwahab for being like the lantern in deep darkness for ignorant people like me. And may Allah forgive their mistakes.
@ Ammar Alsaeed : Thanks. Beautiful sharing. May Allah SWT, have mercy upon us and continually guide us to the right path. Jazak Allahu khayr, Sir. Aamiin.
@@user-oc7vm5tr8y ammen, you also bithnILLAH may ALLAH grant you and your righteous family Jannah Firdaus in shaa ALLAH Ameen LAA IL AHA IL ALLAH Wa Muhammad Ar RasuLLAH salahlahu alayhi wa salaam
i see no attacking from Hijab , he's saying that Hadith is clear enough that you don't need to read the book to understand , you forgot that common people don't read books to understand their deen , correct me if i'm wrong
What do you want us to do? Water down our religion and unite with every misguided sect? Sunan Ibn Majah 3992 It was narrated from ‘Awf bin Malik that the Messenger of Allah(ﷺ) said: “The Jews split into seventy-one sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy in Hell. The Christians split into seventy-two sects, seventy-one of which will be in Hell and one in Paradise. I swear by the One Whose Hand is the soul of Muhammad, my nation will split into seventy-three sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy-two in Hell.” It was said: “O Messenger of Allah, who are they?” He said: “The main body.”
@@pedroorovio4699 Nobody need to watered down anything, communicate like intellectuals, have peaceful conversation, be the bigger person and try to talk to the other in a calm and collected manners. Shows that even we have differences, we can still unite as one ummah, we still believe in one same Allah. In the time where the kafeer and the dajjal minions try their best to disunite us, dont contribute to their goal. Its really not that hard to understand
@@MotivatingAkhi I dont think i have enough information to judge anyone yet as i and im sure you and most of Muslim are in a journey of understanding Islam and what it means to be a mukmin. When i understand certain things, i didnt say the other is absolutely wrong, because i relies on Allah to guide me, im certainly dont have the knowledge enough to be absolute certain that im right and other people is wrong, so what i do is i abstain from doing anything such as labelling and calling names to the other side that just gonna disunite us, but rather focus on the intellectual discussion, because we’re all on a journey of knowledge, sometime we learn something and sometime we need to unlearn something, and i pray that Allah guide you, me and all Muslim to the truth because in the end we’re all want the same thing, to obtain Allah blessing. Ameen ya rabbal alamin. May Allah bless you brother, Assalamualaikum
@@pedroorovio4699 no but we should look for ways to make thigns easier for new reverts, Sh. Albani mentioned this in his book Prophet's prayer, even mathhabism got in the way of people accepting Islam smoothly.
*If you read Quran alone, there is NO Sunni, Shia, Tawheed, etc, there. Tawheed, Sunni and Shia was invented later by the Ulamas, after the creation of the Hadith, Sirah and Tafseer. If we read the Quran alone, we find so many heretical theology in it : Gnosticism, Ebionism, Kollyridianism, Arianism, etc.*
The last Hadith you mentioned. does it apply to the Madkhali movement that attacks so many scholars doing tabdee on them with which you also empathize?
Shia, kawarij, sufis all read the Quran and hadith yet all all of them don't understand tawheed properly, this is why scholars are needed. قال النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم : ( يبعث الله على رأس كل مائة عام من يجدد لهذه الأمة أمر دينها ) قال الله تعالى : ( يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا أَطِيعُوا اللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا الرَّسُولَ وَأُولِي الْأَمْرِ مِنْكُمْ فَإِنْ تَنَازَعْتُمْ فِي شَيْءٍ فَرُدُّوهُ إِلَى اللَّهِ وَالرَّسُولِ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِاللَّهِ وَالْيَوْمِ الْآخِرِ ذَلِكَ خَيْرٌ وَأَحْسَنُ تَأْوِيلًا ) النساء/59. قال عليه الصلاة والسلام : ( يحمل هذا العلم من كل خلف عُدوله ، ينفون عنه تحريف الغالين وانتحال المبطلين ) . قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : ( إن الدين بدأ غريبًا ويرجع غريبًا ؛ فطوبى للغرباء الذين يصلحون ما أفسد الناس من بعدي من سنتي ).
@@tayloryoung4974 why don't we read the compendious works of the salaf then that explain each hadith and ayaat in depth? On what grounds can you claim that any work of MiAW or any contemporary scholar is "required"
وهل عبد الوهاب رسول؟، إنه شيخ عاش في القرن الثامن عشر .. و الأصول الثلاثة ليست شرع و التوحيد موجود في السور كسورة الإخلاص و العقيدة صحيحة عند جماعة الأشاعرة و الماترودية هم أصحاب أهل السنة الحقّة... و هل تكلّم الرسول عن الأصول الثلاثة أم عن أركان الإسلام الستّة؟؟؟ ما لكم كيف تأتون بأمور مُحدثةٍ؟!!!
@@MotivatingAkhi when the scholars talk about belief they categorised into 2 types the science of belief and the general belief of the Muslims. There is definitely a need for reform when it comes to dealing with the general people a lot of times these different groups focus on the science of belief when talking to the general people this creates groupism and creates confusion and a overflow of knowledge that they cannot understand. What we need to focus on is developing comprehensive programs to build young men and women with in those programs we need to focus on the general belief of the Muslims which goes back to the six pillars of faith the Five Pillars of Islam questions in the Grave and focusing on the Quran you do not need to reference academia in order to teach Muslim the basic belief when you reference books like Muhammad ibn Abdul wahhab works and then you say the only thing in it is quran and Sunnah it begs to ask the question why not just teach the quran and the Sunnah rather than reference names in certain books that you have been indoctrinated into even in the circles of academia Islamic academia he is not a reference he is a organiser organiser of certain points from the Quran and the Sunnah may Allah be pleased with him for his efforts but let's not at work the person does not have controversy surrounding him there is no controversy as it relates to the Quran in the Sunnah stick to the fundamentals the basic belief of the Sunnah the belief of the general Muslims it is not be fitting to involve the general Muslims into academic discussions that is political that is group ISM can you find both parties doing these the sufi and salafi I have been studying academic belief for over 3 years now in Egypt I have yet to find any reference naming these two names when it comes to believe rather these two groups you certain people to justify they're groups in their political agenda there is definitely a debate amongst scholarship well teaching in allowing the Muslim to make his decision they like to say don't blind follow but they teach in the way where you cannot think for yourself stick to the one of the four schools Allah says in the Quran if you don't know go to those who know it's that simple stick to basic belief and you will be safe inshallah only the academics should be discussing academics basic logic Allah give you a brain for a reason
Ur saying stop talking about ulemas and on the same video ur calling scholars deviant what a contradiction i don't know how ur videos just appeared to me
Victim card technique, Abdul Wahab is above sunnah? Asking same question as you all do to Barelvi and deobandis when they defend their scholar with same technique
Watch Shamsi's video on the same topic (Dus Dawah). It is unfortunate that Muslims are slandering scholars of the past like that. Even if some followers of a certain scholar are deviant, that does not invalidate the message that the scholar spread. Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “This knowledge will be carried by the trustworthy of every successive generation, refuting the corruption of extremists, the distortions of falsifiers, and the interpretations of the ignorant.” Source: Musnad al-Shāmiyyīn 588 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Ahmad ibn Hanbal
@@spartanbeast3575 najdis are specialists at criticising ulema so they can literally shut their filthy mouths. Even the great imams of past are not spared. Even sahaba are not spared from the poisonous tongues of the najdis so why do u cry if someone levels criticism at MIAW?
@@mkdon101 What? Which sahaba & imam of the past isn't spared if you not a liar? We criticize but Issue is you lie on Islam & Muslims. Can you tell Where is Allah if you not the one w/ worship issues? Thought so.
@@mkdon101 You are now generalising all Najdis into a group of slanderers. It is not true that all of them are like that. What about the scholars and qurraat who were arrested by the Najdis? Some of those arrested were Najdis themselves. I am not crying about criticism on ibn Abd al Wahhab; rather, I am warning against slandering the ulamaa' of the ummah in general, whether that be ibn al Uthaymeen or bin Baaz or al Albaani, etc.
قال النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم : ( يبعث الله على رأس كل مائة عام من يجدد لهذه الأمة أمر دينها ) . قال عليه الصلاة والسلام : ( يحمل هذا العلم من كل خلف عُدوله ، ينفون عنه تحريف الغالين وانتحال المبطلين ) . قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : ( إن الدين بدأ غريبًا ويرجع غريبًا ؛ فطوبى للغرباء الذين يصلحون ما أفسد الناس من بعدي من سنتي ).
ok maybe technically they are not required ok... but his books are great for grounding... it's like saying Sahih Bukhari isn't needed, ok but it's a great useful intellectual technology that saves time.
Mohamed Hijab didn't mean to leave the Tawheed or Arkan al Iman at all and what he meant by "we don't need these books" is that specific book only not every book that clarifies Tawheed! he just says that depending on only one book by one Imam is wrong as the Tawheed fundamentals are already there and we know them not just from Imam Ibn Abd El Wahab books but from other Imams books also so he wanted to say don't raise Imam Ibn Abd EL Wahab above his rank.
Hijab wants to say Leave sufi Shia quburis , let them worship graves tombs dargah .. They won't be ask about it Only 3 questions which will be asked is better to learn from prophet hadith than learning tauhid of forbidding saints Graves tombs venerations..
@@ahmedsalah7474 brother, it seems quite apparent that you are unaware of the manhaj and aqeedah of Muhammad H. He is an arrogant individual that doesn't truly understand his deen... If any Muslim truly understands the manhaj and aqeedah of the Salaf, he would easily conclude that MH is upon misguidance... In fact I'll point out one thing which clearly highlighted to me that this guy is upon falsehood and doesn't truly respect this blessed deen of Islam. It occurred when I first saw him in speakers Corner and he was wearing a vest. How can any person who claims to be a caller to Allah's religion and to the correct sunnah of the Prophet salallahu alayhi wasalam, be doing so whilst wearing a vest. Some of you may think that this is a small insignificant matter, however, it's absolutely not. How can a Muslim be calling to Allah and His messenger whilst wearing a vest, SubhaanAllah, it clearly highlights the lack of respect he has. Would he wear a vest to a wedding or job interview?... No he wouldn't because it would be perceived as grossly disrespectful and an employer would NEVER employ such an individual... However, he deems it to be ok to call to Allah's deen with a vest... Allahu musta'aan... Let's be serious this guy is a clown 🤡
You got it wrong bro. That's not what ustadh Faris is saying. He's trying to say usool thalatha, tafsir bn kathir, tafsir atTabari, Al aqeedah Al wasitiyyah, fathul barii all do a great in explaining the Quran and Sunnah according upon the understanding of the pious predecessors. He's only trying to show that Mohammed Hijab is spewing ignorance by criticizing the tremendous book. And Allãh knows best
@@yussifhamoud146 what the scholars do is connect the Quran and sunnah and fahim sahaba and compile them in context for topics. This is what the hadith Jibril did I believe.
I used/ taught kitab At tawheed materials without mentioning the name of the book and the general public find books like Aqeedah Al wasiteyah very complicated when it comes to names and attributes of Allah. I stick to الدروس المهمة لعامة الأمة لابن الباز - very useful and successful I may have used sheikh uthaymeens explaintation on certain materials and not mention his name mainly because some “salafis” act like they are the chosen ones and are very extreme in their behavior with the Muslim public. This is coming from someone who grew up and studied in the gulf and very active in the dawah scene in America so we are partly to blame. People are turned off on hearing certain names but I have managed to generate students over a period of time who eventually become open.
Jazak Allahu Khayr brother... yea I think a scholar gave out ibn Abdul Wahab books to ppl who hated him without the cover then later learned it was his books and changed their views, May Allah guide us.
Brother, I don't think that is not necessarily the case, there Dawah has also has an impact on the people, I am also an example of that, I was a Naqshabandi Maturdi, the Sufi guys I listened to said that you should urine at Kitab At-Tawheed of Sheikh Muhammad, but Allah than guided me to the Sunnah, those people works and video did help, so they have an impact. Not omitting any mistake they have made. But that is still a source of goodness.
Stop lying I just heard his talk he didn't belittle it. Its just u najdis put that little pamphlet on par with Quran and hadith. Plenty of better and more detailed books available.
he said him taking the hadith and commenting is 1000x better then Sh. ibn Abdul Wahab taking the same hadith and commenting with other ayat and hadith, hijab belittled and contradicted himself, take your own advice, and what book would you recommend that's better, I am always open to learning.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 how is that belittling? Problem is u najdis WORSHIP MIAW and get more offended if someone says anything negative about him than if someone insulted Allah and his rasool (saw). There is more to islam than him.
@@mkdon101 Awuthubillah you liar. More then Allah and His Rasool, peace & blessings be on him? You didn't even put dua. Who did worship or taqlid? I will take your good deeds and you take my sins for your lies insha Allah unless you repent openly. Sh. Albani criticized ibn Abdul Wahab and I agreed many times and disagreed with Sh. Albani when he opposed sunna.
@@mkdon101 As for belittling I said he contradicted & he said hadith of 3 questions of grave & just commentary is better but that is the hadith ibn Abdul Wahab spoke of with other Quran and hadith. What's better Quran in context or cut and paste Quran without checking, maybe you have human worship issues as he opposed grave worship, may Allah protect us from your lies.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 cry more najdi and save me them tears. Alhamdulillah the Islamic Emirates of Afghanistan are putting an end to the satanic najdi dawah
What's wrong with Daniel Haqiqatjou? May Allah guide me and everyone, online dawah scene is beyond confusing for lay muslims, so much fitna, everyone refuting everyone, no way to tell who is right and wrong anymore.
The concept of Tawheed should NOT be the reason to wipe out all archeological remains of Islamic history or the tombs of pious people from the Hijaz areas; or the overall Islamic lands arounds Mecca and Medina. Every Muslim's soul belongs to Mecca and Medina, those areas belong to every Muslim on earth.
Even if he said that why is he saying he can write his own comments and its 1k x better than Quran and Sunna compilation, this is the problem with Hijab he contradicts & lies, he says he agrees than says he's better or better in fiqh... when sadly even a 5 yr old knew more Tawhid than him as Nasir Al Hanbali showed in his video on him!
the problem of Mohammed hijab is that he reads orientalists a lot, whether they are Christians or atheists. They seek to convince, through all the authors he reads. It reminds me of the same mistake al ghazali made in imbibing the philosophers of the time which led him to the premise of Sufism. convincing Muslims and non-Muslims alike with Islam no longer satisfies him. it is the problem of the dawah which comes from the Anglo-Saxon world. We can mention Omar Suleiman from yaqeen institute or, Yasir qadhi, who are the most seen in social networks. Hence the importance of the place or the person in whom one seeks his religious knowledge.
Absolute misrepresentation of MH. He was responding to someone else saying that their ideology(yours included) have raisen Shaykh MIAW Rh to a status of infallibility. He was not a faqeeh like ash-Shawkani or a Muhaddith like al-Albani he was a reformer, activist, a caller and a reviver. He never in the video targetted the Shaykh accusing him of deviance like your opened your slanderous tongue against two of the contemporary Ulema of stature that can't even dream of. And you talk about keeping tongue closed regarding awlia of Allah.
@@talibeilm21c But u said we consider Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab infallible, which is a lie against us. And do u consider Muhammad Hijab a scholar? Muhammad Hijab even when talking about Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab said ‘I think’ or ‘I believe’ or ‘In my opinion’. Ur opinions don’t work in Islam bro. If Muhammad Hijab really thinks the books of Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab is not needed for guidance then he should present evidences for it. Muhammad Hijab puts his words into our mouth. He said that we treat Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab as someone who receives revelation which is a blatant lie. So it’s him and you who opens slanderous tongues against us.
You're strawmaning little kid, our objection is MH belittling the sheikh and his works, next try to man up and deal with your opponents objections, but I don't think you'll because that's what your teacher hijab taught you
@@thetruthful1612 MH made a statement and your response to it demonstrates that you have raised Shaykh MIAW to a stature of infallibility. Like he cannot be talked about or discussed. It openly doesn't have to be words. Like extreme Sufis saying we don't see awliya as gods but by actions contradicting themselves. Muhammad Hijab is not a "Scholar/Alim" of any disciplines of Islamic sciences nor does he claim. He's a caller/Daee. People have throughout history of Islam expressed opinions, to give opinions of theirs in a matter they are conversing about like you're doing right now, expressing your opinion.
Learning Usool Al-Thalatha through Sheikh Ahmad Musa Jebril (which he went even FURTHER into the concept than the book does and breaks it down to where a 7-year old student could comprehend) was LIFE CHANGING. I just wish I knew which book to go to next to continue on my basics of aqeedah as I am a student of knowledge who wants to become a sheikha InshaAllah
@@user-yq2if6ld9h There is nothing wrong with Sheikh Ahmad Musa Jibril nor his father Sheikh Musa Jibril. Especially since I wasn't even taking from Sheikh Ahmad's own scholarship within learning Usool Al-Thalatha- he was simply a mouthpiece with which to learn the book from. If you claim he is someone to be avoided you need to bring evidence to support WHY. You cannot just warn people against something without a valid reason- and having a personal feeling against him isn't such. So I request you to explain why I should refrain from him.
AMJ is no good, sister. he might look as if he’s calling for salafiyyah but hes actually calling for extremism and the khawarij methodology. Get the explanation of ibn Uthaymeen and other big scholars sister.
@@Farishammadi السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته As a student of knowledge, I would like to have some examples to explain your stance on him. And I never took fatwa from him, nor have I watched his own courses. I simply learned Usool Al-Thalatha through him. So he was simply a mouthpiece for the book. My husband personally said that in the past he had some questionable stances, but that the Usool course he gave was clean and appropriate to take from. I do take from Ibn Uthaymeen as well. Unfortunately my husband has been unable to get ahold of him since the last time he spoke with him about some of his stances since he just came back out to teach. Edit: I won't take your opinion as a fatwa for or against any scholar, so do not be wary about that- but I would like your personal views on shyookh like Sheikh Sulayman Al-Alwan, Sheikh Younus Kathrada of Canada, and Sheikh Hassan Al-Kettani (if you are familiar with either of them; I have taken direct fatwas from Sheikh Kathrada and Al-Kettani in the past). If you're not comfortable giving your stances on a public forum I have a way where I can be reached on this issue. InshaAllah
@@asiyaheibhlin وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته I just know Sulaiman Al Alwan, the scholars refuted him he’s no good, a takfiri - in fact, hes in prison because of his takfir and his deviant political ideologies
@Umm Muhammad Jazak Allahu Khayr, books Shamsi recommends are much better. After ibn Abdul Wahab small books, Aqida WAsitiyah Shar ibn Uthaymin and Usul Sunnah by ibn Hanbal are great grounding books.
@Umm Muhammad Amin. Wa iyaki. Ibn Uthaymin did a commentary on Aqida Wasitiya, they have pdf. There is also audio version by Abu Uwais on yt which is interesting. Usul Sunnah commentary by Sh. Rabi is really good. Shar us Sunnah by imam Barbahari is really good. Islamic Aqida & it's history by Muhammad Aman al Jami is really good, its 200 pages. That's a good closing book that goes to roots and history of ideas as they developed until now in a concise way. I hope these are easy but very beneficial to you. May Allah guide us to beneficial knowledge and good provisions and accepted actions.
It grounds on the topic well... its similar to saying we don't need Bukhari, its true the hadith in bukhari are elsewhere but its compiled in a very useful way is the point. I always looked at it as compiling points as scholarship that goes back to hadith JIbril.
These books are mountains of knowledge, that are permeated with Tawheed at its pinnacle. Such books are to be respected and even more needed more than ever. Especially in light of our ummah going through trials due to not understanding Tawheed, falling into shirk, and straying far astray from the sunnnah contrary to the understanding of our beloved companions. And muhamad hijab a youngster comes along and discredit such books! Who is he, actually we need to know which imams and scholars he takes from because it certainly is not our scholars of all us sunna wal jamaah such shaikh Al bani, shaikh bin Baz, shaikh uthaymeen. The dawa is not in need of him he is need of dawa. The Tawheed is at the crown if all issues, and we as an ummah need to give it our utmost attention, as our Prophet Muhammad , (pbuh) did. Without this pillar there is no Islam! Thats why such books are written. Something hijab should understand and give due respect to. He is not helping the dawa, quite the opposite!
I'm sorry but a sheikh or dawah person in speaker corner will throw anything from the religion under the bus just to win an argument, I've been watching their videos for years
Never took him seriously. His ego is over the moon. Talking BS as if he has the absolute truth to make name for himself and make money on TH-cam is his main interest. May Allah give him some humility and speak with humility.
Everyone knows that Islam is a heap of ca--mel dung,see Iran, a survey said 2 years back that Iran is almost a non Muslim country and here we are... Next is Saudi and the rest will follow.
This is a musunderstsnding. Private sins =/= public call to deviance. One is oppression against oneself and between the person and Allah, and the other is oppression against the Religion of Allah and is between the person, the people, and Allah. We are obliged to hide, make excuses for, and advice in private for the former and oppose, refute, and clarify to the people for the latter, all while observing hikmah, manners & referring back to the Book and the Sunnah.
@@yaseencygra2127 Umar ibn Al-Khattab رضي الله عنه said : 'We judge by what's apparent and we leave their inner secrets to Allah. ' Sahih Al-Bukhari, 2498.
Salam alaykum akhi, I agree that Mohammed H needs guiding to the Haqq ie the correct understanding of the religion. However, do you mind explaining your statement that we "need him" and that he's a "gem"?
@@mopak6424 he's a Muslim but not upon the correct Foundation and understanding because it's clear to see that he doesn't have the correct understanding of Allah's names and attributes. Therefore, a person can be guided to Islam, in a general sense, but not upon the correct sunnah
Jazakallah khair Brother Fairs, may Allah swt bless you and your work, please continue your work, so that those Juhal won't have a platform anymore and I pray that Allah swt may guide the youth through your videos and channel back to Kitab wa Sunnah upon the understanding of the Salaf. All those books on Kalam damaged Hijabs Brain and now his following his mentors Qadhi and Brown ect! He did again, last time he attacked Shaykh Al Albani ra., he made fun of Shaykh Al Fawzan! May Allah swt guide him.
He should have read Dham wa Kalam wa Akhlihi of Sheikh-ul-Islam Imam Abu Ismail Al-Harawi al-Ansari. I remember when I was a Naqshabandi Maturidi I did have this inferiority complex as well. But after I was guided to the Sunnah, by the will of Allah, all of it was eradicated.
I have Kitab At-Tawheed, Sharh Usool Al- Eman and Usool Thalaathah and they are BRILLIANT! Would rather read these books than Muhammad Hijab's Ilmul Kalam rhetoric nonsense!
Md. Ikwani Hijab contradicted himself as ibn Abdul Wahab discusses that same hadith with other scripture... and he was refuted on Sifaat by a 5 yr old. Go to Nasir al Hanbali channel.
Brother I think hijab mentioned Muhammad ibn al Wahab (r.a) with regards to certain other people who single out a few scholars and drop everyone else. Jazakallah khair
Wow !! Look at him, not educated enough and refuting scholars without sound basis. This is prime example how "YT dawah" can become a trial. This is eye opening to both them and us as followers.
The problem with brother Mohamed Hijab is this, he want to respect and treat equally all the firqah within Muslim, Ummah, so we don't fight each other. That's why he doesn't like those Ullama who fight against shirk in the religion
I wouldn't call a man who called to fitnah and war in all muslim countries, and encouraged the destabilisation of the ummah and destruction of muslim homelands a scholar, he was so brave sitting in his comfortable house declaring khurooj in other nations, but not fighting himself.
Abdul Wahab is not read in most Muslim countries. He's mostly a boogeyman in those countries. I can't imagine Nigerians, Deobandis in Pakistan or Afghanistan, or Indonesians who live deep in the humid jungle to bother very much with Abdul Wahab. Not that he's bad, he's just not terribly relevant. Those other countries have their own ulama. Others have come to bring 'Wahabism" in those countries and mostly they get their ass kicked, and the people revert back to their own cultural version of Islam. Abdul Wahab is a reformer, not a Daee. Islam came to Southeast Asia mostly through seafaring merchant sufi arabs. Some of the biggest hindu/buddhist temples lay within the lands of the Malaysians and Indonesians. Imagine if Abdul Wahab propagated Islam in these lands, he would get his ass kicked by the locals. Luckily it was mostly the sufis that came, who were generally more tolerant and patient.
Bro stop hating on other people. Both of you are Ahlus Sunnah. Just do your dawah, call to Allah, unite hearts and inshala the Ummah will improve. You are in Saudi I am guessing...why don't you stop people do Halloween do some real hisbah. You call Sh Qardawi RA a deviant. Allamah Didu led his Janazah. You are not even a fraction of him. Shame on you
What i find amazing is you madkhalis call everyone a takfeeri where in fact you near enough worship someone who made Mass takfeer upon people and slaughtered them. By the way madhakalah how was Halloween in the blessed land?
See if you don't want people to expose your double standards, learn to be honest. Shamsi opposed Hallowwen like your bro kariji... & Sh. Albani & even Mbs opposed ibn Abdul Wahab, maybe you are projecting... You were saying? "who made Mass takfeer" - As for takfīr (excommunication), then I [only] make takfīr of the one who came to know [the reality] of the the religion of the Messengers and after he came to know it, reviled it, prohibited the people from it and showed enmity towards whoever acted upon it. This is the one who whom I declare a disbeliever, **and the majority of the [Muslim] nation - and all praise is due to Allāh - are not like that. **
"Madkhali" - what is this that you violate Quran 49 :11 and give nicknames, bring academic proof as Quran 2 :11 says if you honest? "Halloween" - you in hind right? Should I ask you how is grave worship there? isn't Halloween and grave worship tied, at least they don't make it din right?
No you don't need wahabi propaganda books There's plenty of more important books one can study. Ibn abdul wahab isn't a faqih or a representive of jurists. You learn how to pray etc from the jurists.
What exactly is the deviance of daniel haqiqatjou?? Which tomb did you see him bowing in front of?? You have exposed yourself here. All you have done is twist hijab's word by using rhetoric like "quran is enough and we do not need tafsir"??? Do you know how many tafsirs and scholars he quotes in his debates??? You almost sound like you have something personal against hijab and haqiqatjou!
no md hijab contradicted as if he is jealous his ikwani dawa is being exposed is insecure... ok we don't need 3 principles of Islam... technically yes, but its a scholarly compilation like other hadith books on a topic, saves time, should we rid nasai too? & that book contains the hadith hijab mentioned, big contradiction!
NO his books show he a scholar on Tawhid, takfr is ok if based on evidence, he defended so not a Cariji, his kids fought Jordan who did Curuj due to sufi bida to secularism which his dawa could of saved, its the opposite. View : As for takfīr (excommunication), then I [only] make takfīr of the one who came to know [the reality] of the the religion of the Messengers and after he came to know it, reviled it, prohibited the people from it and showed enmity towards whoever acted upon it. This is the one who whom I declare a disbeliever, *and the majority of the [Muslim] nation - and all praise is due to Allāh - are not like that. * Refer to al-Durar al-Saniyyah (1/54-56) and it is also in his Muʾallāfat (5/36-37)
If these books are required for guidance then What about all the Muslims who came before sheikh Abdul Wahab ( R.A )?? ALL the great scholars of past ibn tamiyah Malik shafi'i etc ?? Where they all on misguidance???? Then you compare the sheiks books to the Quran ( tafsir )??? SubhannaLlah.. His books were no doubt important. But they are not article of faith... so don't make them nor compare the sheiks books to the Quran.... The information in the sheiks books can be found in the ahadith and Quran...
How can he sit there and criticise usool athalathah and say 1 hadith is better than it, when he has a whole library of books filled with the sayings of kaafir western philosophers?? Doesn't make any sense. I don't know what influenced him to start attacking salafis and Saudi sheikhs but ever since a few years ago when he started to cooperate with asharis and ally with them he has become more open and staunch against us. May Allah guide him.
Im so happy that Mohamad Hijab, someone who is influential, finally shares his ideas on MAW and thus sheds light on the great zulum he has done. I hope people will be able to hear a different narration from the Athari perspective. MAW is everything but a great alim. Happy to share this. Thank you Hijab
Lmfao I love the ending like Ibn Taymiyyah, Abdul Wahab didn’t make takfir talk bad about the Walis of the Ulema Abdul Wahab actually waged war and murdered many he hisself the maker of this video talks bad about people in this video may Allah expose you for what you truly are.
Don’t attack the ulemaaa… few moments before… The Deviant “Shiekh Dedew & Shiekh Qardawi” May Allah destroy this filthy ideology Al Madakhilah. You had your run for a while in the west but now sadly it’s come to an end. On ground you actually have no affect & everyone is coming to realise you’re deceptive ideology.
AudubILLAH min Ash Shaytaan Ar Rajgeem BismiLLAH AR RAHMAN AR RAHEEM As Salaam Alaykoom wa RahmatuLLAHi ...balaa wa HUWA KHALLAAQUL 'ALEEM... Sura Ya Seen Sign 81 You know the Brother is not calling Imam Wahab a deviant and He Is absolutely spot on We only need ALLAH'S Guidance Quran and Sunnah Wan naazi aati gharqa Wan naa shi tactics nashta Was saabi a-haati sabha Fast saabi quality sabqa Fal mu dab-bi raati amra An Naziat Signs 1_5 Keep The Faith wALLAHi Ihkwan I love you all for the sake Of ALLAH
@@thetruthful1612 no one is refuting the book. No one said the contents of the book is bad either. But this book is not required for the Muslim to understand Islam. If you argue otherwise you're in a difficult spot. The claim was simply that It is not REQUIRED. Do you agree or disagree?
@@somedonny8466 Ofc I disagree. The content of book is nothing except for Ayaats of Quran and saheeh hadith. Now can u tell me why this book is not required?
After the Quran and Ahadeeth we are desperately in need of these great Aqeedah, fiqh, manhaj book of the Aimma. These people have a campaign to bring Shaykh Ibn Abdul Wahhabs dawah and in turn Salafi Dawah, it's Aqeedah and Manhaj....their hatred for Spubs and co have led them to stereotype all salafis as extreme in refutations...though we also condemn Spubs and co for that ...
That video is from several tears ago. He stated that Muhammad ibn Abdulwahab was not a scholar. Did he bring anything new to Islam? If he did it is a bidaa? If he didn’t not why go nuts over him is he more important than the prophet and what he left the Quran and Sunnah? Are you like the people of the book who took their rabbis and priests as their lords besides Allah. He did not curse him or malign his person, it is not obligatory to follow him or anyone else except the Quran and Sunnah. So stop exaggerating his critique, this Is Shamsi grand plan to grow his followers and malign other Muslims.
MH always not fair when it comes to some scholars. especially the salafis. Tawheed unites the ummah and I think every Muslim should have the usual thlth
He said it's not "required". There were righteous Muslims before MIAW (RA). Required = absolutely necessary, needed (the word you used) = extremely beneficial or useful. Barakallahu feekum.
Well what you think of him is wrong. He meant that it is not important at all. Like don't even read it, even his own aqeedah is corrupt there is a video of him accusing the athari aqeedah to be a belief just like hindu gods. This here is severely blasphemous. Furthermore this guy MH praises philosophy books and the kuffar that wrote them. You can clearly see his deviance here. He does not respect any of the scholars. And may Allah guide him and the others with him that are misguided. Ameen.
Narrated `Abdullah bin `Amr bin Al-`As: I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, "Allah does not take away the knowledge, by taking it away from (the hearts of) the people, but takes it away by the death of the religious learned men till when none of the (religious learned men) remains, people will take as their leaders ignorant persons who when consulted will give their verdict without knowledge. So they will go astray and will lead the people astray."
@@AbuMoosaa Read history, don’t follow what your parents are doing blindly, god gave you a brain to use, look at the history, talk to people out of your own sect to gain knowledge, don’t get the saved sect syndrome, look at people like: Al-ghazali + Al nawawi + ibn hajar. They aren’t salafis, look at most of the sanad of the Quran (it’s not salafi), just read (not from salafi sources), be open to be corrected, don’t close yourself to opposing ideas.
@@3boodjr462 Imaam ghazali was a great Imaam. I'm from the Shafi Mathab but learn from the Hanafi Mathab as well. Hoping to look into the other two Hannabili and Maliki soon
@@JohnWick-hc8xl imaam Al ghazal Is a giant in the Ashaari aqeedah and the shafi fiqh, I would advise you to start with the three suni aqeedas and see which one makes sense the most, and always ask questions, the more questions you ask the more answers you get (ask the people of the manhaj) never ask the opposing side for their opinion it will never be unbiased
Do you know saajid and shamsi and many others condemned Halloween in and out of Saudi for weeks, some salafis for years, you can disagree with them and be wrong but no need to misrepresent or be dishonest.
@@iamnasay6944 Just because you can do something in Saudi, it does not mean it is permitted by the government or the scholars. What makes you think that there aren’t people out there celebrating mawlid in private? If there existed munafiqun/fasiqun at the time of the people upon whom be peace, surely such people will exist in Saudi today. We ask Allah to guide the muslim ummah, ameen. But that’s not your real issue. You people are desperate to find mistakes/sins and issues with Saudi so you can point fingers and justify your own shirky practices.
Ustadh Faris, I love you for the sake of Allah the Almighty. I deleted tiktok and Instagram to avoid the fitnah there but I did benefit from your content you posted there. Could you also upload your videos here on TH-cam as well?
It’s sad that all these guys beef because I listen to all of them from Shamsi to Hijab to this dude they all seem like great men. Arguing about things that don’t take anyone out the fold of Islam
He is not a scholar, his teacher even said that this dude was slow in the brain, he got no ijaza neither any shhood on his eligibility on being a scholar + never forget he worked with the brits to kill Muslims
I agree, we need those books. But it's heavily dependent on ur teacher, at the end of it u will come out fine level headed or an extremist looking and waiting ppl to make mistakes and use it to virtue signall. plus y'all make this book as if it is one of the pillars of Islam.
@@hellblazersharif It grounds on the topic well... its similar to saying we don't need Bukhari, its true the hadith in bukhari are elsewhere but its compiled in a very useful way is the point. I always looked at it as compiling points as scholarship that goes back to hadith JIbril.
SubhaanAllah, I think that you seriously need to get back to basics and understand this book as the information it contains is waajib because it's based upon the 3 questions that we will be asked in our grave. Therefore, to suggested that it's been treated as though it's a pillar of islsm is absurd and highlights the lack of knowledge and understanding you have... The fact that you've made that statement actually indicates how much you are in need of studying such great works like the 3 fundamental principles, may Allah guide me to the haqq and you
@@kennethnelson5430 lol, my guy I studied those books but I was lucky I had a level headed teacher who didn't let learning those books got in to my head and make me a fanatic or egotistical. but most of the ppl whom I know turned out to be fanatic or egotistical person. some of them joined....groups and some of them start reaching and start accusing ppl of shirk even their own teachers, scholars , obnoxious around their family members and start arguments. I promise you ppl don't start acting like that after reading a hadith book like bulugh-almeram, riyadusualihin, sahih-albukhari.......etc. and no it's not wajib to learn this book to be a muslim. the prophet(pbuh) said {تركت فيكم ما إن تمسكتم بهما لن تضلوا بعدي أبدا ، كتاب الله وسنتي"} all we need is Quran and hadith nothing more. we can learn from and appreciate a scholarly work but that doesn't mean they are the rule for our guidance, no body has the authority above Quran and hadith. I personally think if you are fresh and beginner you shouldn't learn these types of books. first test the waters with basic fiqha and hadith books and just some course about tawhid by your teachers costumed to the society you are living in cuz they know their ppl better and what and how they will understand the concept of shirk, bida'a ..... then after that after some one realizes he doesn't know any thing about Islam then we introduce division heavy books not from the jump.
@jk0102 my guy I studied those books but I was lucky I had a level headed teacher who didn't let learning those books got in to my head and make me a fanatic or egotistical. but most of the ppl whom I know turned out to be fanatic or egotistical person. some of them joined....groups and some of them start reaching and start accusing ppl of shirk even their own teachers, scholars , obnoxious around their family members and start arguments. I promise you ppl don't start acting like that after reading a hadith book like bulugh-almeram, riyadusualihin, sahih-albukhari.......etc. and no it's not wajib to learn this book to be a muslim. the prophet(pbuh) said {تركت فيكم ما إن تمسكتم بهما لن تضلوا بعدي أبدا ، كتاب الله وسنتي"} all we need is Quran and hadith nothing more. we can learn from and appreciate a scholarly work but that doesn't mean they are the rule for our guidance, no body has the authority above Quran and hadith. I personally think if you are fresh and beginner you shouldn't learn these types of books. first test the waters with basic fiqha and hadith books and just some course about tawhid by your teachers costumed to the society you are living in cuz they know their ppl better and what and how they will understand the concept of shirk, bida'a ..... then after that after some one realizes he doesn't know any thing about Islam then we introduce division heavy books not from the jump.
Literally We have The Blessings of ALLAH uncountable and in shaa ALLAH Imam Wahab Qadr ALLAH was ment and sent but Quran wa Sunnah of The 3 Generations Is only thing needed
I’m shook tbh. So disappointed. He is throwing his own opinion as if he is a scholar, arrogance at it’s best, may Allah guide us all to haq amen
He merely said the Prophet has higher status than MIAW. If you disagree than you're a Disbeliever. It's worrying that you seem to be objecting to this.
What is the point then? That he 'disrespects scholars'? If you think its disrespect to say that the Prophet's status is higher than an overrated 'scholar' like MIAW, than I am afraid, you should review your Iman and come out clearly and declare that you are an apostate.
His pamphlet is not a work of scholarship. And it most certainly is not required for guidance. If you believe that it is, there is no difference between those that follow the Talmud over the Torah and the followers of Ibn Abdul Wahhab.
@@muhammadkhan7051 fear Allah and stop twisting reality to justify hijab’s actions
@@muhammadkhan7051 then you have not read MIAW books. As Usool ath Thalatha is ayaat and ahadith. So you're sating ayaat and ahadith are wrong, check your Iman dear brother. Re-read Shahadah, how can you insult Allah and His Rasool Sallallahu Alayhi Wassallam.
How can you raise the Prophet Sallallahu Alayhi Wassallam above Allah. This is Christian methodology.
@@ExtremeShez The Book of Allah is the Quran. How can you suggest that the book authored by MIAW is the work of Allah? You are a Jaahil, if not an outright Disbeliever. This in itself is Judeo-Christian.
This is what happens when someone glorifies secular philosophy over islamic knowledge
Absolutely my brother... You're completely correct. If we humble ourselves and study the correct books of aqeedah, we will not feel the need to praise or view any other ideology or belief system above our blessed deen
What has that got anything to do with this? It's like people like to plug that in everywhere and anywhere
@@TheRockeyAllen it's got everything to do with what you saying what are you talking about? He dismisses the Sunnah for his own way and this is where it's lead him.
@@TheRockeyAllen i mean giving dawah on "i think" "in my opinion" "according to this philosophy" is not a problem?
Ahlussumna wal jamaa don't go agaist the consenses of the scholars. Doesn't mean only early scholars also present time scholars.
They're all agreed upon miaw was among the best authors about tawheed. And he's out if his arrogance denouncing him. Not even for some writing mistakes were taken out abou miaw
@Ahmad Kafi From what I can understand, no one here is denying the importance of the contributions of Sh MIAW. The only contention is with layman people who make it seem as though Islam is incomplete without those contributions. (Hence, the usage of the word "need")
Subhan'Allah, lets not forget Al-Wahhab is one of the beautiful Names of Allah.
This stigma "wahhabism" is propagated by the West, it's a shame the Ummah is perpetuating this.
Imam Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, May Allah have Mercy on him, reminded the Ummah about Tawheed, let's be sincere and ask Allah for Guidance and the Straight Path in His Deen, Al-Islam.
Mohamed Abdalwahab was a tool by the British empire and he was not known for being a sheikh. His father was a sheikh. He died 230 years ago and his ugly pictures are still available on the enternet. His brother Suleiman said he crossed the line and became kufr.
another wahhabi dork.
the vast majority of ummah doesn't know yo pagan cult exist.
wahhabis used to call emselves wahhabis. 🤣
Well put Faris, this is exactly what I was thinking these past few months about these pseudo preachers 🙏🏻 Islam is a peaceful religion and simple to understand if we follow the right path of the Ullema, but unfortunately this mentioned group is making it hard and suffocating and their followers even more. May Allah guide them to the right path 🙏🏻
Akh,i don't call him pseudo preachers
He deserve respect
Maybe he didn't get that
He’s a Oxford Graduate and is a completing Ph.D student in Theology
@@pcsheep3978what’s that gonna help him in the grave
May Allah guide us all Ameen
Amin. And give swift victory to Sunnis over Ahl bida until end times and then.
Brother please do this behind the scenes. The constant arguments between dawah people causes people to think negatively of dawah guys in general
Why ? If hijab can do it public why others must do behind the scenes?
th-cam.com/video/UAgBXhDuUzA/w-d-xo.html
Whatever
Is MH do behind the scenes ?
@One True Path I feel like most people didn't even k ow about this . Right now because of tate people who may be interested in Islam may be put off seeing this drama
@@lilacblue783
We are not discouraged anyone, hidayah is from Allah. Refuting deviant is actually show's how Islam is unique and better than others religion.
Subhanallah when it comes to Muhammed Abdulwahab these "Wahabis" go crazy!
But they forget about commenting on Hallowen event that took place in KSA!
@3ABO - Do you know saajid and shamsi and many others condemned Halloween in and out of Saudi for weeks, some salafis for years, you can disagree with them and be wrong but no need to misrepresent or be dishonest.
I guess what hijab meant is that it is not crucial for the preservation of aqidah that you can have an alternative for it. Think about hadith books for example, we have bukhari's book that Allah made it a crucial step in the preservation of the prophet’s traditions, meanwhile some other books are not as crucial.
And as far as I know we have tens of other aqidah books that were produced during the Era of the emergence of other misguided sects and produced by people of the first three centuries (salaf). Such books are (I hope you can read the titles in Arabic) :
1- الإيمان (by abdulqasim ibn Salam, died 234 h)
2-الإيمان( by abu bakr ibn abi shaibah, died 235 h)
3-أصول السنه(Ahmad ibn hanbl, died 241 h)
4-خلق أفعال العباد(bukhari, died 256 h)
5-شرح السنه (barbahri, died 329 h)
6-شرح أصول اعتقاد اهل السنه والجماعه. (Lalak'i, died 418 h)
And tens of other salaf's aqidah books.
May Allah bless those imams and mohammed ibn abdulwahab for being like the lantern in deep darkness for ignorant people like me. And may Allah forgive their mistakes.
@ Ammar Alsaeed : Thanks. Beautiful sharing. May Allah SWT, have mercy upon us and continually guide us to the right path. Jazak Allahu khayr, Sir. Aamiin.
@@user-oc7vm5tr8ysalaam ya beloved, remember to renew as salaam even on the www in shaa ALLAH
Salaam habibi don't forget to renew as salaam bithnILLAH
@ Ameer Isa : Wa'alaikumsalam Yallah habibi. Thanks. Noted. Have a good day ahead, brother Ameer. Aamiin.
@@user-oc7vm5tr8y ammen, you also bithnILLAH may ALLAH grant you and your righteous family Jannah Firdaus in shaa ALLAH Ameen LAA IL AHA IL ALLAH Wa Muhammad Ar RasuLLAH salahlahu alayhi wa salaam
i see no attacking from Hijab , he's saying that Hadith is clear enough that you don't need to read the book to understand , you forgot that common people don't read books to understand their deen , correct me if i'm wrong
This fighting is doing harm to us and the new reverts . Who is right and who is wrong ? Every sect is trying to prove the other is wrong
What do you want us to do? Water down our religion and unite with every misguided sect?
Sunan Ibn Majah 3992
It was narrated from ‘Awf bin Malik that the Messenger of Allah(ﷺ) said:
“The Jews split into seventy-one sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy in Hell. The Christians split into seventy-two sects, seventy-one of which will be in Hell and one in Paradise. I swear by the One Whose Hand is the soul of Muhammad, my nation will split into seventy-three sects, one of which will be in Paradise and seventy-two in Hell.” It was said: “O Messenger of Allah, who are they?” He said: “The main body.”
@@pedroorovio4699 Nobody need to watered down anything, communicate like intellectuals, have peaceful conversation, be the bigger person and try to talk to the other in a calm and collected manners. Shows that even we have differences, we can still unite as one ummah, we still believe in one same Allah. In the time where the kafeer and the dajjal minions try their best to disunite us, dont contribute to their goal. Its really not that hard to understand
@@pedroorovio4699 which is the misguided sect you are against here and what part of their belief is a misguidance?
@@MotivatingAkhi I dont think i have enough information to judge anyone yet as i and im sure you and most of Muslim are in a journey of understanding Islam and what it means to be a mukmin. When i understand certain things, i didnt say the other is absolutely wrong, because i relies on Allah to guide me, im certainly dont have the knowledge enough to be absolute certain that im right and other people is wrong, so what i do is i abstain from doing anything such as labelling and calling names to the other side that just gonna disunite us, but rather focus on the intellectual discussion, because we’re all on a journey of knowledge, sometime we learn something and sometime we need to unlearn something, and i pray that Allah guide you, me and all Muslim to the truth because in the end we’re all want the same thing, to obtain Allah blessing. Ameen ya rabbal alamin. May Allah bless you brother, Assalamualaikum
@@pedroorovio4699 no but we should look for ways to make thigns easier for new reverts, Sh. Albani mentioned this in his book Prophet's prayer, even mathhabism got in the way of people accepting Islam smoothly.
I agree with u 100%. Only thing is that the Mohammad Hijab video is not new, as u mentioned. Just wanted to clarify.
*If you read Quran alone, there is NO Sunni, Shia, Tawheed, etc, there. Tawheed, Sunni and Shia was invented later by the Ulamas, after the creation of the Hadith, Sirah and Tafseer. If we read the Quran alone, we find so many heretical theology in it : Gnosticism, Ebionism, Kollyridianism, Arianism, etc.*
The last Hadith you mentioned. does it apply to the Madkhali movement that attacks so many scholars doing tabdee on them with which you also empathize?
Excellent refutation Allahumma Barik
They stop worshiping tombs and start worshiping the Kaaba 5 times a day.
do not attack each other Publicly.
Saying that mh is wrong is not attacking
Bro stop being emotional. What Mohamed hijab is doing is very dangerous, it needs to happen in public
if someone makes a mistake in public it can be addressed in public
Very true...the enemies are watching...
ya Hayyu ya Qoyuum please guide us, ameen
Amin.
Honestly
I don't disagree with m.h.
I always wonder why we had to study a book miaw wrote
If the Quran clearly is about the Oneness of Allah
I don't know why they pedestalise it so much.
Maybe a political agenda? Who knows
Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab wrote Ayaats of Quran and Hadith in his books
Shia, kawarij, sufis all read the Quran and hadith yet all all of them don't understand tawheed properly, this is why scholars are needed.
قال النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم : ( يبعث الله على رأس كل مائة عام من يجدد لهذه الأمة أمر دينها )
قال الله تعالى : ( يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا أَطِيعُوا اللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا الرَّسُولَ وَأُولِي الْأَمْرِ مِنْكُمْ فَإِنْ تَنَازَعْتُمْ فِي شَيْءٍ فَرُدُّوهُ إِلَى اللَّهِ وَالرَّسُولِ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِاللَّهِ وَالْيَوْمِ الْآخِرِ ذَلِكَ خَيْرٌ وَأَحْسَنُ تَأْوِيلًا ) النساء/59.
قال عليه الصلاة والسلام : ( يحمل هذا العلم من كل خلف عُدوله ، ينفون عنه تحريف الغالين وانتحال المبطلين ) .
قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : ( إن الدين بدأ غريبًا ويرجع غريبًا ؛ فطوبى للغرباء الذين يصلحون ما أفسد الناس من بعدي من سنتي ).
@@tayloryoung4974 why don't we read the compendious works of the salaf then that explain each hadith and ayaat in depth? On what grounds can you claim that any work of MiAW or any contemporary scholar is "required"
وهل عبد الوهاب رسول؟، إنه شيخ عاش في القرن الثامن عشر .. و الأصول الثلاثة ليست شرع و التوحيد موجود في السور كسورة الإخلاص و العقيدة صحيحة عند جماعة الأشاعرة و الماترودية هم أصحاب أهل السنة الحقّة...
و هل تكلّم الرسول عن الأصول الثلاثة أم عن أركان الإسلام الستّة؟؟؟ ما لكم كيف تأتون بأمور مُحدثةٍ؟!!!
The video is about 2 years ago.. And just now i response.. Instead of listening to full arguments u used short clip video as make assumptions on it..
Everything he just mentioned you do not need Muhammad ibn Abdul wahhab books to teach Muslims that. That is basic belief
@@MotivatingAkhi when the scholars talk about belief they categorised into 2 types the science of belief and the general belief of the Muslims. There is definitely a need for reform when it comes to dealing with the general people a lot of times these different groups focus on the science of belief when talking to the general people this creates groupism and creates confusion and a overflow of knowledge that they cannot understand. What we need to focus on is developing comprehensive programs to build young men and women with in those programs we need to focus on the general belief of the Muslims which goes back to the six pillars of faith the Five Pillars of Islam questions in the Grave and focusing on the Quran you do not need to reference academia in order to teach Muslim the basic belief when you reference books like Muhammad ibn Abdul wahhab works and then you say the only thing in it is quran and Sunnah it begs to ask the question why not just teach the quran and the Sunnah rather than reference names in certain books that you have been indoctrinated into even in the circles of academia Islamic academia he is not a reference he is a organiser organiser of certain points from the Quran and the Sunnah may Allah be pleased with him for his efforts but let's not at work the person does not have controversy surrounding him there is no controversy as it relates to the Quran in the Sunnah stick to the fundamentals the basic belief of the Sunnah the belief of the general Muslims it is not be fitting to involve the general Muslims into academic discussions that is political that is group ISM can you find both parties doing these the sufi and salafi I have been studying academic belief for over 3 years now in Egypt I have yet to find any reference naming these two names when it comes to believe rather these two groups you certain people to justify they're groups in their political agenda there is definitely a debate amongst scholarship well teaching in allowing the Muslim to make his decision they like to say don't blind follow but they teach in the way where you cannot think for yourself stick to the one of the four schools Allah says in the Quran if you don't know go to those who know it's that simple stick to basic belief and you will be safe inshallah only the academics should be discussing academics basic logic Allah give you a brain for a reason
@@MotivatingAkhi A simple answer we are not teaching. I asked Allah to forgive us
Ur saying stop talking about ulemas and on the same video ur calling scholars deviant what a contradiction i don't know how ur videos just appeared to me
When u called ibn Wahab a mujaddid
That’s when I knew your reality
May Allah guide us all
But i would advise you to learn islamic history
Victim card technique, Abdul Wahab is above sunnah? Asking same question as you all do to Barelvi and deobandis when they defend their scholar with same technique
Jazakallahu khaira, May Allah preserve the brothers like you who are defending the Deen of Allah Aameen
More like defending the deviant najdi dawah. Its a curse
Watch Shamsi's video on the same topic (Dus Dawah). It is unfortunate that Muslims are slandering scholars of the past like that.
Even if some followers of a certain scholar are deviant, that does not invalidate the message that the scholar spread.
Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “This knowledge will be carried by the trustworthy of every successive generation, refuting the corruption of extremists, the distortions of falsifiers, and the interpretations of the ignorant.”
Source: Musnad al-Shāmiyyīn 588
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Ahmad ibn Hanbal
@@spartanbeast3575 najdis are specialists at criticising ulema so they can literally shut their filthy mouths. Even the great imams of past are not spared. Even sahaba are not spared from the poisonous tongues of the najdis so why do u cry if someone levels criticism at MIAW?
@@mkdon101 What? Which sahaba & imam of the past isn't spared if you not a liar?
We criticize but Issue is you lie on Islam & Muslims. Can you tell Where is Allah if you not the one w/ worship issues? Thought so.
@@mkdon101 You are now generalising all Najdis into a group of slanderers. It is not true that all of them are like that. What about the scholars and qurraat who were arrested by the Najdis? Some of those arrested were Najdis themselves.
I am not crying about criticism on ibn Abd al Wahhab; rather, I am warning against slandering the ulamaa' of the ummah in general, whether that be ibn al Uthaymeen or bin Baaz or al Albaani, etc.
Yess those books are NOT REQUIRED
قال النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم : ( يبعث الله على رأس كل مائة عام من يجدد لهذه الأمة أمر دينها ) .
قال عليه الصلاة والسلام : ( يحمل هذا العلم من كل خلف عُدوله ، ينفون عنه تحريف الغالين وانتحال المبطلين ) .
قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : ( إن الدين بدأ غريبًا ويرجع غريبًا ؛ فطوبى للغرباء الذين يصلحون ما أفسد الناس من بعدي من سنتي ).
ok maybe technically they are not required ok... but his books are great for grounding... it's like saying Sahih Bukhari isn't needed, ok but it's a great useful intellectual technology that saves time.
Mohamed Hijab didn't mean to leave the Tawheed or Arkan al Iman at all and what he meant by "we don't need these books" is that specific book only not every book that clarifies Tawheed! he just says that depending on only one book by one Imam is wrong as the Tawheed fundamentals are already there and we know them not just from Imam Ibn Abd El Wahab books but from other Imams books also so he wanted to say don't raise Imam Ibn Abd EL Wahab above his rank.
Hijab wants to say
Leave sufi Shia quburis , let them worship graves tombs dargah ..
They won't be ask about it
Only 3 questions which will be asked is better to learn from prophet hadith than learning tauhid of forbidding saints Graves tombs venerations..
@@NK236 Brother you are thinking bad about Hijab it's سوء الظن he didn't mean that.
@@ahmedsalah7474 how can I think good of one who attack islamic monotheism and forbid speaking against evil of Sufi grave saints veneration...
@@ahmedsalah7474 brother, it seems quite apparent that you are unaware of the manhaj and aqeedah of Muhammad H. He is an arrogant individual that doesn't truly understand his deen... If any Muslim truly understands the manhaj and aqeedah of the Salaf, he would easily conclude that MH is upon misguidance... In fact I'll point out one thing which clearly highlighted to me that this guy is upon falsehood and doesn't truly respect this blessed deen of Islam. It occurred when I first saw him in speakers Corner and he was wearing a vest. How can any person who claims to be a caller to Allah's religion and to the correct sunnah of the Prophet salallahu alayhi wasalam, be doing so whilst wearing a vest. Some of you may think that this is a small insignificant matter, however, it's absolutely not. How can a Muslim be calling to Allah and His messenger whilst wearing a vest, SubhaanAllah, it clearly highlights the lack of respect he has. Would he wear a vest to a wedding or job interview?... No he wouldn't because it would be perceived as grossly disrespectful and an employer would NEVER employ such an individual... However, he deems it to be ok to call to Allah's deen with a vest... Allahu musta'aan... Let's be serious this guy is a clown 🤡
I'm so glad someone addressed this We only need Quran & the Sunnah ,everything else I've heard new and to be honest it's been confusing me 😢
You got it wrong bro. That's not what ustadh Faris is saying. He's trying to say usool thalatha, tafsir bn kathir, tafsir atTabari, Al aqeedah Al wasitiyyah, fathul barii all do a great in explaining the Quran and Sunnah according upon the understanding of the pious predecessors. He's only trying to show that Mohammed Hijab is spewing ignorance by criticizing the tremendous book. And Allãh knows best
Need people to explain the books like Quran and Sunnah that’s why Allah says in the Quran “ask the people of knowledge if you do not know “
@@yussifhamoud146 what the scholars do is connect the Quran and sunnah and fahim sahaba and compile them in context for topics. This is what the hadith Jibril did I believe.
@@adeyemibashir7243 tremendous nonsense 😂🤣one of the most nonsensical book.
@@yussifhamoud146 only Christian prince is knowledgeable when it comes to the Quran and hadiths.
I used/ taught kitab At tawheed materials without mentioning the name of the book and the general public find books like Aqeedah Al wasiteyah very complicated when it comes to names and attributes of Allah. I stick to الدروس المهمة لعامة الأمة لابن الباز - very useful and successful
I may have used sheikh uthaymeens explaintation on certain materials and not mention his name mainly because some “salafis” act like they are the chosen ones and are very extreme in their behavior with the Muslim public.
This is coming from someone who grew up and studied in the gulf and very active in the dawah scene in America so we are partly to blame. People are turned off on hearing certain names but I have managed to generate students over a period of time who eventually become open.
Jazak Allahu Khayr brother... yea I think a scholar gave out ibn Abdul Wahab books to ppl who hated him without the cover then later learned it was his books and changed their views, May Allah guide us.
Brother, I don't think that is not necessarily the case, there Dawah has also has an impact on the people, I am also an example of that, I was a Naqshabandi Maturdi, the Sufi guys I listened to said that you should urine at Kitab At-Tawheed of Sheikh Muhammad, but Allah than guided me to the Sunnah, those people works and video did help, so they have an impact. Not omitting any mistake they have made. But that is still a source of goodness.
Stop lying I just heard his talk he didn't belittle it. Its just u najdis put that little pamphlet on par with Quran and hadith. Plenty of better and more detailed books available.
he said him taking the hadith and commenting is 1000x better then Sh. ibn Abdul Wahab taking the same hadith and commenting with other ayat and hadith, hijab belittled and contradicted himself, take your own advice, and what book would you recommend that's better, I am always open to learning.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 how is that belittling? Problem is u najdis WORSHIP MIAW and get more offended if someone says anything negative about him than if someone insulted Allah and his rasool (saw). There is more to islam than him.
@@mkdon101 Awuthubillah you liar. More then Allah and His Rasool, peace & blessings be on him? You didn't even put dua. Who did worship or taqlid? I will take your good deeds and you take my sins for your lies insha Allah unless you repent openly. Sh. Albani criticized ibn Abdul Wahab and I agreed many times and disagreed with Sh. Albani when he opposed sunna.
@@mkdon101 As for belittling I said he contradicted & he said hadith of 3 questions of grave & just commentary is better but that is the hadith ibn Abdul Wahab spoke of with other Quran and hadith. What's better Quran in context or cut and paste Quran without checking, maybe you have human worship issues as he opposed grave worship, may Allah protect us from your lies.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 cry more najdi and save me them tears. Alhamdulillah the Islamic Emirates of Afghanistan are putting an end to the satanic najdi dawah
What's wrong with Daniel Haqiqatjou?
May Allah guide me and everyone, online dawah scene is beyond confusing for lay muslims, so much fitna, everyone refuting everyone, no way to tell who is right and wrong anymore.
The concept of Tawheed should NOT be the reason to wipe out all archeological remains of Islamic history or the tombs of pious people from the Hijaz areas; or the overall Islamic lands arounds Mecca and Medina. Every Muslim's soul belongs to Mecca and Medina, those areas belong to every Muslim on earth.
We are with you sheikh....barakallahu feek
Play the full clip ...he said he studied the book and he said he agrees with everything that is in the book
Is that so.. Can you share the link.. MH really helped me with many doubts regarding dheen.. I'm sad after seeing this accusation.. So pls share it
Even if he said that why is he saying he can write his own comments and its 1k x better than Quran and Sunna compilation, this is the problem with Hijab he contradicts & lies, he says he agrees than says he's better or better in fiqh... when sadly even a 5 yr old knew more Tawhid than him as Nasir Al Hanbali showed in his video on him!
Our beautiful scholars studied and fought endlessly to get these books together to save the people going into shirk like the others did in the past
the problem of Mohammed hijab is that he reads orientalists a lot, whether they are Christians or atheists.
They seek to convince, through all the authors he reads. It reminds me of the same mistake al ghazali made in imbibing the philosophers of the time which led him to the premise of Sufism.
convincing Muslims and non-Muslims alike with Islam no longer satisfies him. it is the problem of the dawah which comes from the Anglo-Saxon world. We can mention Omar Suleiman from yaqeen institute or, Yasir qadhi, who are the most seen in social networks.
Hence the importance of the place or the person in whom one seeks his religious knowledge.
Absolute misrepresentation of MH. He was responding to someone else saying that their ideology(yours included) have raisen Shaykh MIAW Rh to a status of infallibility. He was not a faqeeh like ash-Shawkani or a Muhaddith like al-Albani he was a reformer, activist, a caller and a reviver. He never in the video targetted the Shaykh accusing him of deviance like your opened your slanderous tongue against two of the contemporary Ulema of stature that can't even dream of. And you talk about keeping tongue closed regarding awlia of Allah.
Lol. Didn’t u open ur slanderous tongue just now? We never said he was infallible.
@@thetruthful1612
I didn't slander any scholar unless this fool from tiktok is what you call a scholar.
@@talibeilm21c But u said we consider Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab infallible, which is a lie against us. And do u consider Muhammad Hijab a scholar? Muhammad Hijab even when talking about Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab said ‘I think’ or ‘I believe’ or ‘In my opinion’. Ur opinions don’t work in Islam bro. If Muhammad Hijab really thinks the books of Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab is not needed for guidance then he should present evidences for it. Muhammad Hijab puts his words into our mouth. He said that we treat Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab as someone who receives revelation which is a blatant lie. So it’s him and you who opens slanderous tongues against us.
You're strawmaning little kid, our objection is MH belittling the sheikh and his works, next try to man up and deal with your opponents objections, but I don't think you'll because that's what your teacher hijab taught you
@@thetruthful1612
MH made a statement and your response to it demonstrates that you have raised Shaykh MIAW to a stature of infallibility. Like he cannot be talked about or discussed. It openly doesn't have to be words. Like extreme Sufis saying we don't see awliya as gods but by actions contradicting themselves.
Muhammad Hijab is not a "Scholar/Alim" of any disciplines of Islamic sciences nor does he claim. He's a caller/Daee.
People have throughout history of Islam expressed opinions, to give opinions of theirs in a matter they are conversing about like you're doing right now, expressing your opinion.
Learning Usool Al-Thalatha through Sheikh Ahmad Musa Jebril (which he went even FURTHER into the concept than the book does and breaks it down to where a 7-year old student could comprehend) was LIFE CHANGING.
I just wish I knew which book to go to next to continue on my basics of aqeedah as I am a student of knowledge who wants to become a sheikha InshaAllah
Stay away from that musa jibril!
@@user-yq2if6ld9h
There is nothing wrong with Sheikh Ahmad Musa Jibril nor his father Sheikh Musa Jibril.
Especially since I wasn't even taking from Sheikh Ahmad's own scholarship within learning Usool Al-Thalatha- he was simply a mouthpiece with which to learn the book from.
If you claim he is someone to be avoided you need to bring evidence to support WHY. You cannot just warn people against something without a valid reason- and having a personal feeling against him isn't such.
So I request you to explain why I should refrain from him.
AMJ is no good, sister. he might look as if he’s calling for salafiyyah but hes actually calling for extremism and the khawarij methodology. Get the explanation of ibn Uthaymeen and other big scholars sister.
@@Farishammadi
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
As a student of knowledge, I would like to have some examples to explain your stance on him.
And I never took fatwa from him, nor have I watched his own courses. I simply learned Usool Al-Thalatha through him. So he was simply a mouthpiece for the book.
My husband personally said that in the past he had some questionable stances, but that the Usool course he gave was clean and appropriate to take from.
I do take from Ibn Uthaymeen as well.
Unfortunately my husband has been unable to get ahold of him since the last time he spoke with him about some of his stances since he just came back out to teach.
Edit: I won't take your opinion as a fatwa for or against any scholar, so do not be wary about that- but I would like your personal views on shyookh like Sheikh Sulayman Al-Alwan, Sheikh Younus Kathrada of Canada, and Sheikh Hassan Al-Kettani (if you are familiar with either of them; I have taken direct fatwas from Sheikh Kathrada and Al-Kettani in the past).
If you're not comfortable giving your stances on a public forum I have a way where I can be reached on this issue. InshaAllah
@@asiyaheibhlin وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته
I just know Sulaiman Al Alwan, the scholars refuted him he’s no good, a takfiri - in fact, hes in prison because of his takfir and his deviant political ideologies
I feel like this dawah scene is getting out of hand. All attacking each other… leave the arguments for the sake of Allah even if you’re right!
Ironic he's speaking about a small pamphlet containing one hadith when all I see is books of philosophy in his library and not a single Islamic book 😂
He is more excited to learn from the kufr books and scholars of the West than Islam, truly the epitome of misguidance.
Lol that aint a valid argument.
@Umm Muhammad Jazak Allahu Khayr, books Shamsi recommends are much better. After ibn Abdul Wahab small books, Aqida WAsitiyah Shar ibn Uthaymin and Usul Sunnah by ibn Hanbal are great grounding books.
@Umm Muhammad Amin. Wa iyaki.
Ibn Uthaymin did a commentary on Aqida Wasitiya, they have pdf.
There is also audio version by Abu Uwais on yt which is interesting.
Usul Sunnah commentary by Sh. Rabi is really good.
Shar us Sunnah by imam Barbahari is really good.
Islamic Aqida & it's history by Muhammad Aman al Jami is really good, its 200 pages. That's a good closing book that goes to roots and history of ideas as they developed until now in a concise way.
I hope these are easy but very beneficial to you.
May Allah guide us to beneficial knowledge and good provisions and accepted actions.
@Umm Muhammad Asalam Aleikum.
View channels : **scholarly Subtitles and PureIslaam and people of knowledge and Abdurrahmanorg and knowledge north**
Jazakallah khair for not only calling him out , but calling out the people he supports
Allahumma Barik. Beautifully said. May Allah Subhana Wa Ta Aalaa bless you and reward you for this.
It grounds on the topic well... its similar to saying we don't need Bukhari, its true the hadith in bukhari are elsewhere but its compiled in a very useful way is the point. I always looked at it as compiling points as scholarship that goes back to hadith JIbril.
like shamsi said.. he never read the book. jaahil
all he reads is philosophy books and how to slander scholars
May allah bless you and preserve you shaikh, jazakallahu khairan for this- much needed
These books are mountains of knowledge, that are permeated with Tawheed at its pinnacle. Such books are to be respected and even more needed more than ever. Especially in light of our ummah going through trials due to not understanding Tawheed, falling into shirk, and straying far astray from the sunnnah contrary to the understanding of our beloved companions. And muhamad hijab a youngster comes along and discredit such books! Who is he, actually we need to know which imams and scholars he takes from because it certainly is not our scholars of all us sunna wal jamaah such shaikh Al bani, shaikh bin Baz, shaikh uthaymeen. The dawa is not in need of him he is need of dawa. The Tawheed is at the crown if all issues, and we as an ummah need to give it our utmost attention, as our Prophet Muhammad , (pbuh) did. Without this pillar there is no Islam! Thats why such books are written. Something hijab should understand and give due respect to. He is not helping the dawa, quite the opposite!
His books what about his actions akhi
I'm sorry but a sheikh or dawah person in speaker corner will throw anything from the religion under the bus just to win an argument, I've been watching their videos for years
Never took him seriously. His ego is over the moon. Talking BS as if he has the absolute truth to make name for himself and make money on TH-cam is his main interest. May Allah give him some humility and speak with humility.
What would have been the opinion of Mohammed bin Abdulwahab if he had seen Hindu temples in UAE? What would have been his ruling on UAE's leaders?
EXACTLY
They'd call MIAW khwarij as he'd be against their daddies regime way
Everyone knows that Islam is a heap of ca--mel dung,see Iran, a survey said 2 years back that Iran is almost a non Muslim country and here we are... Next is Saudi and the rest will follow.
@Ex_Muslime AT-DE-CH🤡🤡🤡
MIAW would be happy his plan worked out
We Muslims seem to forget a simple Sunnah, which is to show the shortcomings of our brothers and sisters in private not publicly like this.
If someone doese it publicly in first place you have to scold them publicly
This is a musunderstsnding. Private sins =/= public call to deviance. One is oppression against oneself and between the person and Allah, and the other is oppression against the Religion of Allah and is between the person, the people, and Allah. We are obliged to hide, make excuses for, and advice in private for the former and oppose, refute, and clarify to the people for the latter, all while observing hikmah, manners & referring back to the Book and the Sunnah.
@@farhadhussein655 any hadith backing it up? No?
@@yaseencygra2127 Umar ibn Al-Khattab رضي الله عنه said : 'We judge by what's apparent and we leave their inner secrets to Allah. ' Sahih Al-Bukhari, 2498.
This is fitnah! Should be clarified publicly..
Like the hadith says, towards the end of time there will be callers to the gates of hell.
ummah is in a serious coma
wake up everyone please
FREE all Muslims from hardship on this duniya
Ameen 🤲🏽🇵🇸❤️
muhammad ibn abdul wahab did massacres so you are saying he is pious lol😂
You'd have never made this video is shamsi did not make one before. Even if you saw the clip.
He came and killed Muslims and also call to Allah let's not forget the first part though
May Allah protect you sheikh.....❤️❤️
Faris the kind face of the Wahhabs.
Let's all pray to Allah to guide Mohammad Hijab and give him hidayah.
Man is a gem of Ummah and we need him.
Wdym he is already guided
Salam alaykum akhi, I agree that Mohammed H needs guiding to the Haqq ie the correct understanding of the religion. However, do you mind explaining your statement that we "need him" and that he's a "gem"?
@@mopak6424 he's a Muslim but not upon the correct Foundation and understanding because it's clear to see that he doesn't have the correct understanding of Allah's names and attributes. Therefore, a person can be guided to Islam, in a general sense, but not upon the correct sunnah
@@mopak6424 M. Hijab is upon problematic Ashairah creed.
Jazakallah khair Brother Fairs, may Allah swt bless you and your work, please continue your work, so that those Juhal won't have a platform anymore and I pray that Allah swt may guide the youth through your videos and channel back to Kitab wa Sunnah upon the understanding of the Salaf.
All those books on Kalam damaged Hijabs Brain and now his following his mentors Qadhi and Brown ect! He did again, last time he attacked Shaykh Al Albani ra., he made fun of Shaykh Al Fawzan! May Allah swt guide him.
He should have read Dham wa Kalam wa Akhlihi of Sheikh-ul-Islam Imam Abu Ismail Al-Harawi al-Ansari. I remember when I was a Naqshabandi Maturidi I did have this inferiority complex as well. But after I was guided to the Sunnah, by the will of Allah, all of it was eradicated.
I have Kitab At-Tawheed, Sharh Usool Al- Eman and Usool Thalaathah and they are BRILLIANT! Would rather read these books than Muhammad Hijab's Ilmul Kalam rhetoric nonsense!
Well said, brother if only Muhammad Hijab has read Dahm wa Kalam wa Akhlihi of Sheikh-ul-Islam Imam Abu Ismail Al-Harawi Al-Ansari.
He’s absolutely right though especially regarding the sifaat of Allah
Are you an ashari?
Md. Ikwani Hijab contradicted himself as ibn Abdul Wahab discusses that same hadith with other scripture... and he was refuted on Sifaat by a 5 yr old.
Go to Nasir al Hanbali channel.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
Hijab is ashari mufawid
Brother I think hijab mentioned Muhammad ibn al Wahab (r.a) with regards to certain other people who single out a few scholars and drop everyone else.
Jazakallah khair
You think?
No he is belittling Ibn taymiyyah
Wow !! Look at him, not educated enough and refuting scholars without sound basis.
This is prime example how "YT dawah" can become a trial.
This is eye opening to both them and us as followers.
The problem with brother Mohamed Hijab is this, he want to respect and treat equally all the firqah within Muslim, Ummah, so we don't fight each other. That's why he doesn't like those Ullama who fight against shirk in the religion
Define shirk
@@3boodjr462 google it
He’s also an ashari and uses kalam so you know he couldn’t help himself
do hijab is an ikwani upset and contradicting himself that he is being corrected, shame on him for being arrogant.
This guy just attacked scholars and then said to Mohammed hijab don't attack our scholars🤣🤣🤣 you can't make this stuff up
Which scholars he attacked plz am waiting??
which scholars did he attack? i’m very interested in your response
I wouldn't call a man who called to fitnah and war in all muslim countries, and encouraged the destabilisation of the ummah and destruction of muslim homelands a scholar, he was so brave sitting in his comfortable house declaring khurooj in other nations, but not fighting himself.
MH is philosophical scholar perhaps
@@aryquadir perhaps...
Ulama is the person who understand and have much ilmu about Quran..follow ulama❤
Abdul Wahab is not read in most Muslim countries. He's mostly a boogeyman in those countries. I can't imagine Nigerians, Deobandis in Pakistan or Afghanistan, or Indonesians who live deep in the humid jungle to bother very much with Abdul Wahab. Not that he's bad, he's just not terribly relevant. Those other countries have their own ulama. Others have come to bring 'Wahabism" in those countries and mostly they get their ass kicked, and the people revert back to their own cultural version of Islam. Abdul Wahab is a reformer, not a Daee. Islam came to Southeast Asia mostly through seafaring merchant sufi arabs. Some of the biggest hindu/buddhist temples lay within the lands of the Malaysians and Indonesians. Imagine if Abdul Wahab propagated Islam in these lands, he would get his ass kicked by the locals. Luckily it was mostly the sufis that came, who were generally more tolerant and patient.
Bro stop hating on other people. Both of you are Ahlus Sunnah. Just do your dawah, call to Allah, unite hearts and inshala the Ummah will improve. You are in Saudi I am guessing...why don't you stop people do Halloween do some real hisbah. You call Sh Qardawi RA a deviant. Allamah Didu led his Janazah. You are not even a fraction of him. Shame on you
What i find amazing is you madkhalis call everyone a takfeeri where in fact you near enough worship someone who made Mass takfeer upon people and slaughtered them. By the way madhakalah how was Halloween in the blessed land?
See if you don't want people to expose your double standards, learn to be honest. Shamsi opposed Hallowwen like your bro kariji... & Sh. Albani & even Mbs opposed ibn Abdul Wahab, maybe you are projecting... You were saying?
"who made Mass takfeer" - As for takfīr (excommunication), then I [only] make takfīr of the one who came to know [the reality] of the the religion of the Messengers and after he came to know it, reviled it, prohibited the people from it and showed enmity towards whoever acted upon it. This is the one who whom I declare a disbeliever, **and the majority of the [Muslim] nation - and all praise is due to Allāh - are not like that. **
"Madkhali" - what is this that you violate Quran 49 :11 and give nicknames, bring academic proof as Quran 2 :11 says if you honest?
"Halloween" - you in hind right? Should I ask you how is grave worship there? isn't Halloween and grave worship tied, at least they don't make it din right?
No you don't need wahabi propaganda books
There's plenty of more important books one can study. Ibn abdul wahab isn't a faqih or a representive of jurists. You learn how to pray etc from the jurists.
Sufi?
Hijab should stick with public debates. It is really his domain.
What exactly is the deviance of daniel haqiqatjou?? Which tomb did you see him bowing in front of?? You have exposed yourself here. All you have done is twist hijab's word by using rhetoric like "quran is enough and we do not need tafsir"??? Do you know how many tafsirs and scholars he quotes in his debates??? You almost sound like you have something personal against hijab and haqiqatjou!
MH’s entire argument is a strawman.
no md hijab contradicted as if he is jealous his ikwani dawa is being exposed is insecure... ok we don't need 3 principles of Islam... technically yes, but its a scholarly compilation like other hadith books on a topic, saves time, should we rid nasai too? & that book contains the hadith hijab mentioned, big contradiction!
I don't think you understood the term "need"
IBn abd-wahab is no scholar , and his books are full of takfeer and blood shed between Muslims , he's the imam of khawarij
NO his books show he a scholar on Tawhid, takfr is ok if based on evidence, he defended so not a Cariji, his kids fought Jordan who did Curuj due to sufi bida to secularism which his dawa could of saved, its the opposite.
View : As for takfīr (excommunication), then I [only] make takfīr of the one who came to know [the reality] of the the religion of the Messengers and after he came to know it, reviled it, prohibited the people from it and showed enmity towards whoever acted upon it. This is the one who whom I declare a disbeliever, *and the majority of the [Muslim] nation - and all praise is due to Allāh - are not like that. *
Refer to al-Durar al-Saniyyah (1/54-56) and it is also in his Muʾallāfat (5/36-37)
If these books are required for guidance then
What about all the Muslims who came before sheikh Abdul Wahab ( R.A )??
ALL the great scholars of past ibn tamiyah Malik shafi'i etc ??
Where they all on misguidance????
Then you compare the sheiks books to the Quran ( tafsir )???
SubhannaLlah..
His books were no doubt important.
But they are not article of faith... so don't make them nor compare the sheiks books to the Quran....
The information in the sheiks books can be found in the ahadith and Quran...
How can he sit there and criticise usool athalathah and say 1 hadith is better than it, when he has a whole library of books filled with the sayings of kaafir western philosophers?? Doesn't make any sense. I don't know what influenced him to start attacking salafis and Saudi sheikhs but ever since a few years ago when he started to cooperate with asharis and ally with them he has become more open and staunch against us. May Allah guide him.
Im so happy that Mohamad Hijab, someone who is influential, finally shares his ideas on MAW and thus sheds light on the great zulum he has done. I hope people will be able to hear a different narration from the Athari perspective.
MAW is everything but a great alim. Happy to share this. Thank you Hijab
Lmfao I love the ending like Ibn Taymiyyah, Abdul Wahab didn’t make takfir talk bad about the Walis of the Ulema Abdul Wahab actually waged war and murdered many he hisself the maker of this video talks bad about people in this video may Allah expose you for what you truly are.
Brother why do u keep making videos about mohammed hijab? Ive seen not one video of him speaking about u?
He said not to attack the 'Ulamâ then says Shaykh Qaradhawi (RA) is deviant this guy is waffling
Read how he revolted against the caliphate
Don’t attack the ulemaaa… few moments before… The Deviant “Shiekh Dedew & Shiekh Qardawi”
May Allah destroy this filthy ideology Al Madakhilah. You had your run for a while in the west but now sadly it’s come to an end. On ground you actually have no affect & everyone is coming to realise you’re deceptive ideology.
AudubILLAH min Ash Shaytaan Ar Rajgeem
BismiLLAH AR RAHMAN AR RAHEEM
As Salaam Alaykoom wa RahmatuLLAHi
...balaa wa HUWA KHALLAAQUL 'ALEEM...
Sura Ya Seen Sign 81
You know the Brother is not calling Imam Wahab a deviant and He Is absolutely spot on We only need ALLAH'S Guidance Quran and Sunnah
Wan naazi aati gharqa
Wan naa shi tactics nashta
Was saabi a-haati sabha
Fast saabi quality sabqa
Fal mu dab-bi raati amra
An Naziat Signs 1_5
Keep The Faith wALLAHi Ihkwan I love you all for the sake
Of ALLAH
Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab wrote Ayaats of Quran and Hadith in his books.
@@thetruthful1612 so do shias should we believe In their books now?
@@somedonny8466 Have u read the Book of Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahab? He’s calling people towards True Islam by quoting Ayaats of Quran and Saheeh Hadith.
@@thetruthful1612 no one is refuting the book. No one said the contents of the book is bad either. But this book is not required for the Muslim to understand Islam. If you argue otherwise you're in a difficult spot. The claim was simply that It is not REQUIRED. Do you agree or disagree?
@@somedonny8466 Ofc I disagree. The content of book is nothing except for Ayaats of Quran and saheeh hadith. Now can u tell me why this book is not required?
we can see Muhammad hijabs frustration with sheikh Muhammad and tawheed and salafi methodology .
On the day of judgement the scholars will be judge separately. That shows how much respect they have
جزاك الله خيرا و سددك في جهاد الحجة و البيان.
After the Quran and Ahadeeth we are desperately in need of these great Aqeedah, fiqh, manhaj book of the Aimma. These people have a campaign to bring Shaykh Ibn Abdul Wahhabs dawah and in turn Salafi Dawah, it's Aqeedah and Manhaj....their hatred for Spubs and co have led them to stereotype all salafis as extreme in refutations...though we also condemn Spubs and co for that ...
Beautifully said. MAy Allah guide us and them.
That video is from several tears ago. He stated that Muhammad ibn Abdulwahab was not a scholar. Did he bring anything new to Islam? If he did it is a bidaa? If he didn’t not why go nuts over him is he more important than the prophet and what he left the Quran and Sunnah? Are you like the people of the book who took their rabbis and priests as their lords besides Allah. He did not curse him or malign his person, it is not obligatory to follow him or anyone else except the Quran and Sunnah. So stop exaggerating his critique, this Is Shamsi grand plan to grow his followers and malign other Muslims.
Was Ibn taymiyyah a wahabi?
@@aaliyah3037 No he was a hanif Muslim, but had his opinions. He was not a Prophet. So what is your point?
@@nma2178 So why is it that we see the same people who cry about MIAW also have an issue with Ibn taymiyyah?
MH always not fair when it comes to some scholars. especially the salafis. Tawheed unites the ummah and I think every Muslim should have the usual thlth
AudubILLAH Sheik May ALLAH Guide You and Us in shaa ALLAH
Say aameen when making dua akhi, not in sha Allah
@@anouaressanoussi Peace to those who follow the guidance. Ameen
He said it's not "required". There were righteous Muslims before MIAW (RA). Required = absolutely necessary, needed (the word you used) = extremely beneficial or useful. Barakallahu feekum.
Well what you think of him is wrong. He meant that it is not important at all. Like don't even read it, even his own aqeedah is corrupt there is a video of him accusing the athari aqeedah to be a belief just like hindu gods. This here is severely blasphemous.
Furthermore this guy MH praises philosophy books and the kuffar that wrote them. You can clearly see his deviance here. He does not respect any of the scholars.
And may Allah guide him and the others with him that are misguided. Ameen.
Narrated `Abdullah bin `Amr bin Al-`As:
I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) saying, "Allah does not take away the knowledge, by taking it away from (the hearts of) the people, but takes it away by the death of the religious learned men till when none of the (religious learned men) remains, people will take as their leaders ignorant persons who when consulted will give their verdict without knowledge. So they will go astray and will lead the people astray."
Haha, miaw thought all of the ppl of his time were not on the haqq including his teachers. Haha.
Ibn Abdul wahhab was a khawarij disowned by his own family who were great hanbali scholars. Muhammad Hijab is right, no one needs him for guidance.
Don't speak from your desires and ignorance
@@AbuMoosaa Facts are facts whether you like them or not
@@AbuMoosaa Read history, don’t follow what your parents are doing blindly, god gave you a brain to use, look at the history, talk to people out of your own sect to gain knowledge, don’t get the saved sect syndrome, look at people like: Al-ghazali + Al nawawi + ibn hajar. They aren’t salafis, look at most of the sanad of the Quran (it’s not salafi), just read (not from salafi sources), be open to be corrected, don’t close yourself to opposing ideas.
@@3boodjr462 Imaam ghazali was a great Imaam. I'm from the Shafi Mathab but learn from the Hanafi Mathab as well. Hoping to look into the other two Hannabili and Maliki soon
@@JohnWick-hc8xl imaam Al ghazal Is a giant in the Ashaari aqeedah and the shafi fiqh, I would advise you to start with the three suni aqeedas and see which one makes sense the most, and always ask questions, the more questions you ask the more answers you get (ask the people of the manhaj) never ask the opposing side for their opinion it will never be unbiased
Halloween is halal..maulid is haram.. Saudis logic.. Let not talk about Halloween.. Munafiqun..
So which Saudi scholar said Halloween is halal?
Do you know saajid and shamsi and many others condemned Halloween in and out of Saudi for weeks, some salafis for years, you can disagree with them and be wrong but no need to misrepresent or be dishonest.
@@aaliyah3037 u can't celebrate maulid in Saudi because it haram.. If u can celebrate Halloween in Saudi means it halal according to them..
@@iamnasay6944 Just because you can do something in Saudi, it does not mean it is permitted by the government or the scholars. What makes you think that there aren’t people out there celebrating mawlid in private? If there existed munafiqun/fasiqun at the time of the people upon whom be peace, surely such people will exist in Saudi today. We ask Allah to guide the muslim ummah, ameen.
But that’s not your real issue. You people are desperate to find mistakes/sins and issues with Saudi so you can point fingers and justify your own shirky practices.
@@aaliyah3037 try so hard to justify saudis celebrating Halloween
Ustadh Faris, I love you for the sake of Allah the Almighty. I deleted tiktok and Instagram to avoid the fitnah there but I did benefit from your content you posted there. Could you also upload your videos here on TH-cam as well?
It’s sad that all these guys beef because I listen to all of them from Shamsi to Hijab to this dude they all seem like great men. Arguing about things that don’t take anyone out the fold of Islam
Abdul wahhab is the scholar of a minority group. Don’t call him mujjadid
He is not a scholar, his teacher even said that this dude was slow in the brain, he got no ijaza neither any shhood on his eligibility on being a scholar + never forget he worked with the brits to kill Muslims
I agree, we need those books. But it's heavily dependent on ur teacher, at the end of it u will come out fine level headed or an extremist looking and waiting ppl to make mistakes and use it to virtue signall. plus y'all make this book as if it is one of the pillars of Islam.
@jk0102 them you dont really need the book in the first case when the bulk of it is hadith.
@@hellblazersharif It grounds on the topic well... its similar to saying we don't need Bukhari, its true the hadith in bukhari are elsewhere but its compiled in a very useful way is the point. I always looked at it as compiling points as scholarship that goes back to hadith JIbril.
SubhaanAllah, I think that you seriously need to get back to basics and understand this book as the information it contains is waajib because it's based upon the 3 questions that we will be asked in our grave. Therefore, to suggested that it's been treated as though it's a pillar of islsm is absurd and highlights the lack of knowledge and understanding you have... The fact that you've made that statement actually indicates how much you are in need of studying such great works like the 3 fundamental principles, may Allah guide me to the haqq and you
@@kennethnelson5430 lol, my guy I studied those books but I was lucky I had a level headed teacher who didn't let learning those books got in to my head and make me a fanatic or egotistical. but most of the ppl whom I know turned out to be fanatic or egotistical person. some of them joined....groups and some of them start reaching and start accusing ppl of shirk even their own teachers, scholars , obnoxious around their family members and start arguments. I promise you ppl don't start acting like that after reading a hadith book like bulugh-almeram, riyadusualihin, sahih-albukhari.......etc. and no it's not wajib to learn this book to be a muslim. the prophet(pbuh) said {تركت فيكم ما إن تمسكتم بهما لن تضلوا بعدي أبدا ، كتاب الله وسنتي"} all we need is Quran and hadith nothing more. we can learn from and appreciate a scholarly work but that doesn't mean they are the rule for our guidance, no body has the authority above Quran and hadith.
I personally think if you are fresh and beginner you shouldn't learn these types of books. first test the waters with basic fiqha and hadith books and just some course about tawhid by your teachers costumed to the society you are living in cuz they know their ppl better and what and how they will understand the concept of shirk, bida'a ..... then after that after some one realizes he doesn't know any thing about Islam then we introduce division heavy books not from the jump.
@jk0102 my guy I studied those books but I was lucky I had a level headed teacher who didn't let learning those books got in to my head and make me a fanatic or egotistical. but most of the ppl whom I know turned out to be fanatic or egotistical person. some of them joined....groups and some of them start reaching and start accusing ppl of shirk even their own teachers, scholars , obnoxious around their family members and start arguments. I promise you ppl don't start acting like that after reading a hadith book like bulugh-almeram, riyadusualihin, sahih-albukhari.......etc. and no it's not wajib to learn this book to be a muslim. the prophet(pbuh) said {تركت فيكم ما إن تمسكتم بهما لن تضلوا بعدي أبدا ، كتاب الله وسنتي"} all we need is Quran and hadith nothing more. we can learn from and appreciate a scholarly work but that doesn't mean they are the rule for our guidance, no body has the authority above Quran and hadith.
I personally think if you are fresh and beginner you shouldn't learn these types of books. first test the waters with basic fiqha and hadith books and just some course about tawhid by your teachers costumed to the society you are living in cuz they know their ppl better and what and how they will understand the concept of shirk, bida'a ..... then after that after some one realizes he doesn't know any thing about Islam then we introduce division heavy books not from the jump.
Literally We have The Blessings of ALLAH uncountable and in shaa ALLAH Imam Wahab Qadr ALLAH was ment and sent but Quran wa Sunnah of The 3 Generations Is only thing needed
On what planet was Abdul Ibn Wahab a Mujadid?