which ibn hadi is it referring? shaykh muhammad ibn hadi al madkhali? or someone else? Also just to let you know, there is a recent video on shaykh muhammad bin hadi al madkhali is invited to give dars to students in the masjid near islamic university of madinah for dawrah probably. Here is the link, to see the shaykh see at 14:14
Know, may Allah have mercy on you, that Muhammad ibn Hadi al-Madkhali deviated according to the people of knowledge. His seniors and the major scholars of Islam such as Shaykh Rabee حفظه الله and Shaykh 'Ubayd al-Jabiri رحمة الله severely warned against him and anyone who follows him! May Allah guide you, fear Allah and follow the evidences.
@@YoucefOukili al-Anazi claims that refuting misguided groups, like the tableegh for example, is not from his methodology, as he himself claims that he only underlines the truth. And this is false, as Muslims we are obliged to underline the truth and to refute falsehood and its people. Sh. 'Arafat al-Muhammadī has refuted his false words, maybe you’ll find it if you look for it in Arabic. May Allah grant us all sincerity & success and make us all humble to retract falsehood, ameen.
@@YoucefOukili dear brother, may Allah give me and you succes, no living being is save from fitnah, ..meaning that he strays from the true path. So upon us is to learn our deen from its authentic sources: the Quran and the Sunnah the way the Salaf us-Salih understood it. We should fear for ourselves and put our trust in Allah and take the means to guidance such as making dua, seeking knowledge etc. We should refer back to the trustworthy salafi scholars and their students who are known for truthfulness and integrity. The blessing is with our elders, one of the imams of our time is sh. Rabee' ibn Hadi al-Madkhali حفظه الله, likewise sh. Salih al-Fawzan حفظه الله and others. Trustworthy english speaking mashayikh are for example the salafis of SalafiPublications like sh. Abu Khadeejah and others.. and know my dear brother that the truth is not known by men but rather men are known by the truth.. so upon us is to learn about the truth so that we may see and differentiate between those who are honest and those who are not, numbers and fame shouldn’t be considered in determining the truth and whose upon it. May Allah guide us to the straight path, ameen.
I questioned him about this in DMs and was not happy with his position but he didn't give me permission to share and hes ended up exposing himself since
Salaam. Akhi this is not fair on Faris. Look at what Faris calls to and the work he has done. Your throwing him off the manhaj because of one thing when look at most of his content that will greatly guide brothers and sisters to the way of the Salaf. Refutations is from the deen but there's a way its done and this isnt right. Barrakallah feek
@@maktabahas-sunnah Mohammed hisham as well? If so can you please send me proof and references so I can use it in case someone asks me about them? I’m kinda aware about the bin hadi situation but what about their cooperation with innovators?
@@maktabahas-sunnah can you please let me know of the scholars and members of spubs who refuted them or the scholars hadn’t caught onto them yet but you have? I’m noticing a salafi channel like masjid daar as sunnah for example still using some of their fatwas (al Badr and Bazmool) so if those individuals are actually bad I need references so I can let the channel know. Otherwise idk Allah knows best.
Brothers did anybody warn against ( dawahwise ) mansur and hashim and (ef dawah) dr. Imraan and other brothers who are uniting with people of misguidance like yasir qadi, daniel haqiqatjou, ali dawah, hijab etc. and they also do use philosophy
@@nazirmohamed1296Yes, I also don't like the fact that some of the Salafis are quite about this. I don't like making video but I feel like I have to do it if nobody else willing to warn against them. Make du'a for me brother, giving da'wah is not easy.
@@SalafiReminders yes I saw their stupid live streams and videos where they mixing with all kinds of innovators and saying things based on personal opinions now I don't watch them anymore and I do feel that they should be warned against because they are getting many followers to be misguided
@@nazirmohamed1296 Yes its sad to see they are getting followers because those people are watching them don't care about learning Manhaj, creed and Aqeedah they are just there to watch them because they want to see other ba'atil religions are defeating in front of their arguments, if you want to warn against them they will gonna tell you, "You guys are dividing Muslims from the Ummah we need to fight against the other religions" blah blah blah absolute retarded stuffs, they failed to realise that without having knowledge of Islam properly especially with the understanding of Salafs your Iman is in danger
Is what faris said incorrect? That the laymen would be better off using his time on other more important matters rather than focusing on a scholars' issues. Is the problem due to not warning out of Muhammed bin hadi who has issues? I was under the influence that warning of mistakes of scholars is done when the time is right/ it's wise to and wasnt mandated to always inform peope of the mistakes of others(ofc when not related to aqeedah issues). Genuinely trying to learn and understand brothers.
Yes, he's incorrect. He's being deceitful for not warning against Ibn Hādi and remaining silent. This isn't the minhaj of the Salaf. These type of people are considered mute devils. The issue of Ibn Hādi has already been clarified by the senior scholars many years ago and they've warned against Ibn Hādi and anyone who defends him and/or remains silent. The same question was asked to Shaykh Rabī' حفظه الله on why he was quick to warn against Ibn Hādi when he took years to warn against Al-Halabi. He simply answered that Ibn Hādi is more severe than Al-Halabi and even more severe than the Haddādis who openly attack the Salafi Scholars.
Salafiyah is not only aqeedah but also a manhaj. Muhammad ibn hadi has deviated against the manhaj of ahlul Sunnah by speaking ill and making tabdee of the people of Sunnah without proofs. He refuses to turn back to the truth and has this left the manhaj of the salaf. May Allah guide him to salafiyah. As for when a salafi scholar makes a mistake in a matter that is not foundational affairs (aqeedah or manhaj) and they make a mistake in a fiqh matter then we do not warn against them or draw the line of disassociation because it is not a foundational matter @@redwon
@@rayaankhan2494 when did he say this? Mohammed ibn hadi used to be known to be from the scholars of Sunnah before he started making tabee of the people of Sunnah without evidence. So he used to him many recommendations from the scholars before he deviated
He blocked me when I pointed out his hipocrisy. Faris thinks that we'll let it slide as long as he praises both sides. He defended Al-Haqqan for unjustly attacking brother Shamsi when he refuted Andrew Tate's falsehood. Faris has also praised and promoted people like Abdur Rahman Hassan in the past, and still hasn't posted any retraction. I really hope people would stop referring to these tiktok influencers as "Sheikh".
@@OsmanDisli88 Sheikh Abu Iyaad حفظه الله has a comprehensive refutation on him, you should be able to find it. Furthermore, recently, ARH brought some deviants to his platform, like individuals from Jamiat Ahlul Hadith Hind (Indian political Hizbi party, also has branches in Pakistan and UK). This Jamiat is known for promoting democracy, sitting with Sufis, Shi'ahs, Hindus and cooperating with them. The Jamiat is also known for having 3xtreme partisanship (Hizb) towards their political leaders and basing their walaa and baraa on their party's interest. They have been refuted and warned by Allamah Sheikh Ubayd حفظه الله and many brothers have detailed refutations of their extreme misguidance. Similarly, many ulema including Sheikh Rabee' حفظه الله have warned against such political parties that take part in democracy. You will be able to understand their misguidance better if you speak Urdu like me. Regardless, ARH deliberately brought Zafar ul Hassan from India to his platform recently and uploaded multiple of his videos. The same Zafar ul Hassan, who is a well known supporter of Jamiat, also went to a conference with "Mufti" Menk as one of the speaker. Zafar Ul Hassan is also a known ally and a friend of Jamiati Anees ur Rahman, who has publicly called Sheikh Rabee’ حفظه الله a TAKFIRI (audhubillah). Anees ur Rahman also said during the Indian elections that voting at the time of elections is the most important thing for Muslims. ARH also brought Abu Zaid Zameer to his platform, another person who supports and praises extreme Jamiati deviants like Meraj Rabbani (who defended a man who said that the Muslims name their children over the Hindu idol "Hanuman" and that Hanuman is a Muslim. And many other scandals and deviant statements) and Jalaluddin Qasmi (supporter of Zakir Naik and known for his deviant statements). Furthermore, Tim Humble, who's very active on ARH's platform was seen sitting with Ali Hasan Al-Halabi, who has been refuted and called an innovator by the senior scholars like Sheikh Rabee' حفظه الله and Sheikh Ubayd حفظه الله. Alhamdulillah the brothers at Salafi Publications are sincere in the deen and you often see that the person they refute only gets worse and shows his true colors as the time passes. So my brothers, stick to the people who do not water down the Manhaj of the Salaf. Asslamu Aleikum.
@EH7yearsago Not one bit exaggeration. He called brother Shamsi's well-formulated refutation as having "0 wisedom", being "destructive" and "head-on attacking". Then he proceeded to tell Andrew Tate to "ignore these people" and learn from "Sheikh" Faris instead. If this is not an attack, what is? He's pushing people away from a Salafi brother whose refutation is based upon truth. And Shamsi even did that after having being in contact with Andrew Tate privately. Furthermore, Al-Haqqan has slandered Salafi brothers as having warned against "Sheikh Muhsin Al Abbad". Even though his books are taught and solid in the masaajid of SPUBs. Where did they warn against him? Straight up lied through his teeth.
Refuting for me isn't hard... I refute all that violates borders of Allah.. I refute all those who try trespass sunna.. Every attempt to mix up from any side ...Is rejected.. All that Almighty revealed ..I believe in it. No matter hw beautiful ur voices ur languages ur backgrounds ur set up... Content that passes sunna And kitabullah is accepted ..rest is garbage...
Honestly only ignorant people still defending and taking knowledge from Mohamed bin hadi al madkhali we are following the truth not people the proofs against mohamed bin hadi al madkhali are clear like water the truth is not with hem simple as this
This is a total waste of time and energy. We as Muslims have been given the Quran and Sunna which guarantees guidance from Allah, and we are not in need of vying on the status of any personality or Shaykh or group or body of Fatwas that constitutes a infallible school of thought. Rather we hold to the Salaf Salih of this Umma over any contemporaries.
![ประสบการณ์ จ้าง Developer ที่ผมจะไม่มีวันลืม [ภาค2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pZbsSDRrmXA/mqdefault.jpg)
which ibn hadi is it referring? shaykh muhammad ibn hadi al madkhali? or someone else?
Also just to let you know, there is a recent video on shaykh muhammad bin hadi al madkhali is invited to give dars to students in the masjid near islamic university of madinah for dawrah probably.
Here is the link, to see the shaykh see at 14:14
Know, may Allah have mercy on you, that Muhammad ibn Hadi al-Madkhali deviated according to the people of knowledge. His seniors and the major scholars of Islam such as Shaykh Rabee حفظه الله and Shaykh 'Ubayd al-Jabiri رحمة الله severely warned against him and anyone who follows him! May Allah guide you, fear Allah and follow the evidences.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 Know that you're a jāhil.
Isnt Muhammad ibn Hadi the son of sheikh Rabee'?
No.
So can we take knowledge from Farhan al Anizi for example ?
@@YoucefOukili al-Anazi claims that refuting misguided groups, like the tableegh for example, is not from his methodology, as he himself claims that he only underlines the truth. And this is false, as Muslims we are obliged to underline the truth and to refute falsehood and its people. Sh. 'Arafat al-Muhammadī has refuted his false words, maybe you’ll find it if you look for it in Arabic. May Allah grant us all sincerity & success and make us all humble to retract falsehood, ameen.
@@YoucefOukili dear brother, may Allah give me and you succes, no living being is save from fitnah, ..meaning that he strays from the true path. So upon us is to learn our deen from its authentic sources: the Quran and the Sunnah the way the Salaf us-Salih understood it. We should fear for ourselves and put our trust in Allah and take the means to guidance such as making dua, seeking knowledge etc. We should refer back to the trustworthy salafi scholars and their students who are known for truthfulness and integrity. The blessing is with our elders, one of the imams of our time is sh. Rabee' ibn Hadi al-Madkhali حفظه الله, likewise sh. Salih al-Fawzan حفظه الله and others. Trustworthy english speaking mashayikh are for example the salafis of SalafiPublications like sh. Abu Khadeejah and others.. and know my dear brother that the truth is not known by men but rather men are known by the truth.. so upon us is to learn about the truth so that we may see and differentiate between those who are honest and those who are not, numbers and fame shouldn’t be considered in determining the truth and whose upon it. May Allah guide us to the straight path, ameen.
No, Farhan cooperates with the people of innovations and deviations.
@@YoucefOukili in the English language you have Salafi sounds, Dus Dawah, Germantown masjid just to name a few.
I questioned him about this in DMs and was not happy with his position but he didn't give me permission to share and hes ended up exposing himself since
He's another musa'fiq.
Salaam. Akhi this is not fair on Faris. Look at what Faris calls to and the work he has done. Your throwing him off the manhaj because of one thing when look at most of his content that will greatly guide brothers and sisters to the way of the Salaf. Refutations is from the deen but there's a way its done and this isnt right. Barrakallah feek
This is called Bidʿah of al-Muwāzanah.
Also, I didn't throw anyone off any manhaj.
@@maktabahas-sunnah what’s bidah of Al muwazana?
Shut it
@@Bumble-n3p
Mentioning the good of a person when you criticise his public errors
First of all greet like a Muslim Salam or aslamolaykum ? When was he ever on the manhaj ?
From what lecture is this, pls a link to the full lecture djazak Allah oe gajran
Check his TH-cam shorts
Date is around 10 August
What’s wrong with saleh as suhaymi, Mohammed bazmool and abdurrazzaq Al badr? Also what about Mohammed Hisham?
They cooperate with the people of innovations and deviations. They also defend Ibn Hādi or are silent.
@@maktabahas-sunnah Mohammed hisham as well? If so can you please send me proof and references so I can use it in case someone asks me about them? I’m kinda aware about the bin hadi situation but what about their cooperation with innovators?
Na'am, look at who he sits with. It's not that difficult to find out.
@@maktabahas-sunnah can you please let me know of the scholars and members of spubs who refuted them or the scholars hadn’t caught onto them yet but you have? I’m noticing a salafi channel like masjid daar as sunnah for example still using some of their fatwas (al Badr and Bazmool) so if those individuals are actually bad I need references so I can let the channel know. Otherwise idk Allah knows best.
@@maktabahas-sunnah Abdul Razzaq al Badr also?
Brothers did anybody warn against ( dawahwise ) mansur and hashim and (ef dawah) dr. Imraan and other brothers who are uniting with people of misguidance like yasir qadi, daniel haqiqatjou, ali dawah, hijab etc. and they also do use philosophy
They're all misguided, stay away from them all.
@@maktabahas-sunnah yes I do believe that they are misguided but I never seen anyone warning against them.
@@nazirmohamed1296Yes, I also don't like the fact that some of the Salafis are quite about this.
I don't like making video but I feel like I have to do it if nobody else willing to warn against them.
Make du'a for me brother, giving da'wah is not easy.
@@SalafiReminders yes I saw their stupid live streams and videos where they mixing with all kinds of innovators and saying things based on personal opinions now I don't watch them anymore and I do feel that they should be warned against because they are getting many followers to be misguided
@@nazirmohamed1296 Yes its sad to see they are getting followers because those people are watching them don't care about learning Manhaj, creed and Aqeedah they are just there to watch them because they want to see other ba'atil religions are defeating in front of their arguments, if you want to warn against them they will gonna tell you, "You guys are dividing Muslims from the Ummah we need to fight against the other religions" blah blah blah absolute retarded stuffs, they failed to realise that without having knowledge of Islam properly especially with the understanding of Salafs your Iman is in danger
Is what faris said incorrect? That the laymen would be better off using his time on other more important matters rather than focusing on a scholars' issues. Is the problem due to not warning out of Muhammed bin hadi who has issues? I was under the influence that warning of mistakes of scholars is done when the time is right/ it's wise to and wasnt mandated to always inform peope of the mistakes of others(ofc when not related to aqeedah issues). Genuinely trying to learn and understand brothers.
Yes, he's incorrect. He's being deceitful for not warning against Ibn Hādi and remaining silent. This isn't the minhaj of the Salaf.
These type of people are considered mute devils.
The issue of Ibn Hādi has already been clarified by the senior scholars many years ago and they've warned against Ibn Hādi and anyone who defends him and/or remains silent.
The same question was asked to Shaykh Rabī' حفظه الله on why he was quick to warn against Ibn Hādi when he took years to warn against Al-Halabi. He simply answered that Ibn Hādi is more severe than Al-Halabi and even more severe than the Haddādis who openly attack the Salafi Scholars.
@@maktabahas-sunnah JazakAllah khair
Salafiyah is not only aqeedah but also a manhaj.
Muhammad ibn hadi has deviated against the manhaj of ahlul Sunnah by speaking ill and making tabdee of the people of Sunnah without proofs. He refuses to turn back to the truth and has this left the manhaj of the salaf. May Allah guide him to salafiyah.
As for when a salafi scholar makes a mistake in a matter that is not foundational affairs (aqeedah or manhaj) and they make a mistake in a fiqh matter then we do not warn against them or draw the line of disassociation because it is not a foundational matter @@redwon
Didn’t shaykh fawzan hafidhahullah say to take from Muhammad bin hadi? May Allah reward you. I saw a clip of his.
@@rayaankhan2494 when did he say this? Mohammed ibn hadi used to be known to be from the scholars of Sunnah before he started making tabee of the people of Sunnah without evidence. So he used to him many recommendations from the scholars before he deviated
He blocked me when I pointed out his hipocrisy. Faris thinks that we'll let it slide as long as he praises both sides.
He defended Al-Haqqan for unjustly attacking brother Shamsi when he refuted Andrew Tate's falsehood.
Faris has also praised and promoted people like Abdur Rahman Hassan in the past, and still hasn't posted any retraction.
I really hope people would stop referring to these tiktok influencers as "Sheikh".
@@OsmanDisli88 Sheikh Abu Iyaad حفظه الله has a comprehensive refutation on him, you should be able to find it.
Furthermore, recently, ARH brought some deviants to his platform, like individuals from Jamiat Ahlul Hadith Hind (Indian political Hizbi party, also has branches in Pakistan and UK). This Jamiat is known for promoting democracy, sitting with Sufis, Shi'ahs, Hindus and cooperating with them. The Jamiat is also known for having 3xtreme partisanship (Hizb) towards their political leaders and basing their walaa and baraa on their party's interest.
They have been refuted and warned by Allamah Sheikh Ubayd حفظه الله and many brothers have detailed refutations of their extreme misguidance.
Similarly, many ulema including Sheikh Rabee' حفظه الله have warned against such political parties that take part in democracy.
You will be able to understand their misguidance better if you speak Urdu like me.
Regardless, ARH deliberately brought Zafar ul Hassan from India to his platform recently and uploaded multiple of his videos. The same Zafar ul Hassan, who is a well known supporter of Jamiat, also went to a conference with "Mufti" Menk as one of the speaker.
Zafar Ul Hassan is also a known ally and a friend of Jamiati Anees ur Rahman, who has publicly called Sheikh Rabee’ حفظه الله a TAKFIRI (audhubillah). Anees ur Rahman also said during the Indian elections that voting at the time of elections is the most important thing for Muslims.
ARH also brought Abu Zaid Zameer to his platform, another person who supports and praises extreme Jamiati deviants like Meraj Rabbani (who defended a man who said that the Muslims name their children over the Hindu idol "Hanuman" and that Hanuman is a Muslim. And many other scandals and deviant statements) and Jalaluddin Qasmi (supporter of Zakir Naik and known for his deviant statements).
Furthermore, Tim Humble, who's very active on ARH's platform was seen sitting with Ali Hasan Al-Halabi, who has been refuted and called an innovator by the senior scholars like Sheikh Rabee' حفظه الله and Sheikh Ubayd حفظه الله.
Alhamdulillah the brothers at Salafi Publications are sincere in the deen and you often see that the person they refute only gets worse and shows his true colors as the time passes.
So my brothers, stick to the people who do not water down the Manhaj of the Salaf.
Asslamu Aleikum.
@@HATL201 arent you exaggerating by saying Ustadh Abdul-Aziz “attacked” Shamsi?
@EH7yearsago Not one bit exaggeration. He called brother Shamsi's well-formulated refutation as having "0 wisedom", being "destructive" and "head-on attacking".
Then he proceeded to tell Andrew Tate to "ignore these people" and learn from "Sheikh" Faris instead.
If this is not an attack, what is?
He's pushing people away from a Salafi brother whose refutation is based upon truth. And Shamsi even did that after having being in contact with Andrew Tate privately.
Furthermore, Al-Haqqan has slandered Salafi brothers as having warned against "Sheikh Muhsin Al Abbad". Even though his books are taught and solid in the masaajid of SPUBs. Where did they warn against him? Straight up lied through his teeth.
@@HATL201 where did he say that they warn against Shaykh Abdul Muhsin Al-Abbad?
@@EH7yearsago can't share link here, it gets deleted.
Has bin Hadi gotten his punishment for slander?
Refuting for me isn't hard...
I refute all that violates borders of Allah..
I refute all those who try trespass sunna..
Every attempt to mix up from any side ...Is rejected..
All that Almighty revealed ..I believe in it.
No matter hw beautiful ur voices ur languages ur backgrounds ur set up...
Content that passes sunna And kitabullah is accepted ..rest is garbage...
who is musa millington
He is a Hajurite from the Americas, may Allah guide him to the Sunnah. Ameen.
A jāhil khabith Hajūri follower who has been opposing the Salafi Dawah especially in the UK for almost two decades.
@@maktabahas-sunnahwhat is khabith?
An evil wicked individual.
@@maktabahas-sunnah what were faris and millington saying in the tweets?
Honestly only ignorant people still defending and taking knowledge from Mohamed bin hadi al madkhali we are following the truth not people the proofs against mohamed bin hadi al madkhali are clear like water the truth is not with hem simple as this
They are hizbis and jamatis musafiqah etc that do this they are not ignorant they are muqalid devils
This is a total waste of time and energy. We as Muslims have been given the Quran and Sunna which guarantees guidance from Allah, and we are not in need of vying on the status of any personality or Shaykh or group or body of Fatwas that constitutes a infallible school of thought. Rather we hold to the Salaf Salih of this Umma over any contemporaries.
So now it's called "vying" if the person isn't upon the Quran or the Sunnah and is refuted?
You speak like you understand them yourself