I've been using 3440x1440 for about 3 years and 4k for 2 years. If anyone's interested, I'll share my impressions too. # My Recent Monitor History: *2009* -- Triple 22" *2010* -- Replaced center monitor with a 30" 16:9 in landscape; turned the two 22" flanking it into portrait. *2017* -- 34" 3440x1440 replaced all of that. Not having a second monitor still made me itch. *2018* -- 23" 2160p added to scratch that itch. Subsequently decided to build a dedicated gaming rig. 3440x1440 moved to the gaming rig and bought a second 4k for the workstation. In other words, ultrawide on the gaming rig and dual 23" 2160p (4k) monitors on the workstation. *2019* -- 43" 2160p took the ultrawide's spot on the gaming rig. What to do with the ultrawide? I moved it back to the workstation in addition to the 2x 4k displays. So now it's dual 4k plus ultrawide on the workstation and a 43" 4k for the gaming rig. *Streaming/Recording* For streaming or recording, I'd _emphatically_ suggest to anyone to stay at 16:9. The pixel scaling issues, and then the layout hassles aren't worth it. Whether you letterbox or crop, half of your audience will complain. I'd say go with 2160p if you can/want, but good old 1080p if you can't or don't care about that many pixels. 2160 --> 1080 is easy downscaling. 1440 --> 720 is another 2:1 step. At 1080p, your resolution won't be a reason you're not growing/retaining viewers. 720 might get you the occasional comment, but this channel has shown how it could actually improve your stream to do so. Either is plenty good, especially with the continuing shift to viewership in handheld screens. Ultrawide content creators definitely have more of a struggle. It's wonky on non-ultrawide displays and viewers click away. *I just wanna play, man* For gaming with no regard for recording/streaming, it depends on what you play. I love the real estate of the 21:9 monitor for some games like MMOs where I can have some UI elements up but out of my way, or panoramic games, driving games, etc. Side scrollers are interesting on ultra-wide. However, for some older titles, they'll puke all over your screen if you try to play them. Skyrim for example, the UI gets very derpy to the point of unusable without some mods that replace the elements with ultrawide versions, but then those mods may not be compatible with other mods you might want. However, when I go back to 16:9 I really miss the panorama sometimes. I've done multi-monitor gaming in the past, starting with expensive hardware signal splitters and even with small bezels, it just isn't the same. *4K?* As for 4k, I was very hyped when I got my first monitor. I'd heard all the amazing tales and I was so excited to bask in the glory. When I fired up a few games after plugging it in, my reaction was kinda "That's it?" Now, where I really noticed the pixel density made a huge difference for me when working with text. So much crisper and less eye fatigue. I immediately switched over to doing the bulk of my 'day job' work primarily on 4k and I've noticed a huge difference in how my eyes feel at the end of a day. *Large Format* I had a 30" 16:9 at my desk at one point, but it was too big. Eye movement was way too excessive and lead to headaches and eye fatigue. If you can push back away from it, it's fine. That actually lead to where I'm at now with my gaming monitor. I'm using a 43" 2160p for gaming, but it's like 2 arms-lengths away from me. Last year, my wife and I set up side-by-side gaming stations with mini-recliners and 43" 4k monitors. We looked up THX guidelines for screen size to viewing distance, and at that scale, the 4k is worthwhile IMO for gaming or video/movies. It's been great, both from a gaming perspective and a relationship perspective. *Current Workstation* The desk where my workstation is at is set up in an L-shape with two 27" 2160p monitors on one side and a 34" 3440x1440 on the other. I just can't make up my mind. My eyes love working on the higher pixel density of the 4k monitors, but there are some tasks that are just nicer to do on the wider screen. I can't quite bring myself to ditch the ultra-wide. If I could have a 21:9 with the pixel pitch/density of a 23" 4k monitor, that just might be my perfect monitor if I could have only one. I do find myself enjoying having at least one additional monitor though, even if it's just to throw up TH-cam of Netflix. If I could only have one monitor and I was stuck with a 16:9, I'd be very, very frustrated. Being stuck with one monitor at 21:9 is less painful than a single monitor at 16:9. I'm not totally content with the display situation on my workstation. Having both the dual 4k side and the ultra-wide side feels wasteful and excessive and not particularly ergonomic. Frankly, it's a bit awkward to use. It's more like having two workstations where I have to rotate 90-degrees to use one or the other. The ultra-wide is just too wide to comfortable have flanking monitors like my old triple-monitor setup. They'd be usable for something like half-backgrounding some TH-cam videos while you work or throwing up some seldom-used monitoring software or something, but the eye and head movement wouldn't be nice for a long workday if it was something more actively used. I'm toying with the idea of experimenting with a pair of 15.6" 1080p monitors in portrait (since they'll match the screen height of the 23") in a triple monitor config. I prefer having one main central monitor versus having to cock my head left or right for prolonged periods with a dual setup. *Recommendations:* * Streaming/recording: 16:9 @ 2160p if you wan/want; 1080p if you can't/don't. * For gaming and not streaming/recording: 3440x1440 accepting that some older titles may need to be played in windowed mode if available. * Only going to have one monitor: 3440x1440 and see if Asus MultiFrame, Display Fusion or similar will help. * For working with text: All other things being equal, a higher resolution on the same size screen will be much easier on the eyes (assuming the text is scaled so you aren't having to squint.) For a dream dedicated editing station, I imagine you'd want maybe 4 monitors if you have room & budget. (1) 3440x1440 for your timeline and main editor suite UI (2) A standard office monitor where you have all of your clips, assets, etc to grab and pull in quickly. (Panoramic ideal) (3) A standard office monitor for things like the script, notes, desktop, etc. (Panoramic ideal) (4) Reference/grading monitor where you can fullscreen the project you're working on * Note separate GPUs are recommended for the displays and image processing. I know that's a heck of a lot of text for a YT comment, and only the most dedicated of monitor nerds (like me) will have actually read it, but I hope it's useful to at least someone. :)
I don't have an external monitor yet. But I want to have an ultrawide.. just for timeline in editing videos. And another one like 4k or 10bit color for true color displays :)
I am currently in the market to find a good gaming monitor so YES, your comment is very useful at least to me. Question though. I'm mainly a MMO gamer (waiting on WOW Shadowlands atm). Would you go 3440x1440 or 4k 16:9 for that specific game. Ty in advance.
I might not be able to do that as my cat likes to lick my computer case (rather humerously, I asked Fractal Design if there's a hidden catnip storage area. They responded too! 😂
As someone that jumped on the ultrawide bandwagon really early, I can't disagree with any of your points. I honestly thought we'd have some better options for snapping to the middle, or setting custom zones or... something, by now. Newp. I can make my windows take up half the screen or all of it. those are my options. I currently am in the habit of snapping firefox to the right, and discord to the left, then dragging firefox over until I can fit a full youtube video into the window. I'm running the Acer XCR341CK (Terrible name. The g-sync version is the "Predator", and I'm over here with a screen I spent $300 less and I get this shit) which is a really nice 10-bit IPS panel @75hz with a freesync range from 30-75hz. Movies are beautiful. Games are amazing. I can't not use adaptive sync, and though it's not 100hz or 144hz, 75hz is still a pretty decent step over 60. I have no desire to replace my screen any time soon. But it has it's frustrations and I can't ever recommend ultrawide to people without a big asterisk and some qualifiers.
Have you looked into FancyZones included in the Microsoft PowerToys collection? It allows you to set custom zones and snap windows to them. I have a PG348Q and I just discovered this and it's fantastic.
Display fusion is also great at quickly moving windows around your monitors and snapping them to different sections quickly via shortcuts. I have shortcuts to snap left and right, move and maximize between monitors, as well as a four window grid
@@BrandonPopson This. I set mine up with 2 zones, as it's better for the type of work I do, but you have a lot of flexibility to organize them as you please.
This video really helped me out a lot with my decision, thank you very much. I would recommend maybe trying to organize your office a bit better though (no offense) lol
Hi EposVox, I have some trouble with OBS and Premiere Pro. My Premiere Pro is extremely laggy when playing back a file recorded with OBS, no matter what setting I use, and I'm using a i9 9900k with an RTX 2070 Super with 32GB RAM, so that couldn't be the issue, right?.. Could you make an updated 2020 OBS settings video? That would be awesome! Love your video's :)
@@RichMantaray Thanks for your answer. I'm giving 28GB of my RAM to Premiere, and it even lags with 1/4th quality. Something really strange is going on and I don't know what it is..
I've been trying many monitors, however, found 34" 3440x1440 the best option for me (for coding, movies, and sometimes games with split screen). Now I'm reconsidering my workspace again. Finally deciding between 32" UHD and 34" 3440x1440. The good thing about 34" is that I can easily split screen and use two apps, and I'm satisfied to have only one monitor cos it works like two. But the total square of 32" is a bit bigger than 34", so I'm still thinking...
Even after getting my 34' 1440p a few years back I still kept my dual 1080 setup to flank the big one . Trust me after a while it will feel wrong to use any smaller aspect monitors. I would try adding a second one in portrait to the right to be used for comms use like discord, web browsing, and other tasks while "content creating". Forgoing the stand I went with a monitor riser shelf so I can still have storage underneath it.
As an owner of an ultrawide monitor myself, I'd love to see more of your videos in 2.35:1/cinemascope! Any chance we'll get some more in the future? I loved watching your past few videos in this aspect ratio on floatplane
Monitor arms that hold 17ish lbs will not function as advertised with a heavier monitor. That doesn't mean they will not hold a heavier one. See, a lot of them can be tightened, but will gradually lose flexibility. Mine is holding the 120hz Dell Alienware ultrawide. I had to tighten it so much that I can't easily move it up or down, I had to find a good height and sort of lock it at that. But it did allow me to get it at a good height and distance that I am very happy with. This arm was only $35, and entirely worth it just for that use IMO.
@EposVox, A great video and honest review I have seen. Thank You so much. I have a humble question to ask, In my country, I am getting this around $1100 USD, and in the other, I was interested in LG34WN80-B at $1000 (Adding all those custom duty charges, etc). So I think this is a better deal for me considering high frame rates, But I am worried about the connectivity with mac (USB c), how does it work? it's fine? You are mentioning that there is some kind of issue with this as it does not work as USB c for connectivity. I am not sure. Kindly guide me. Looking forward. :) I want to use it mainly with my mac, and windows often & connectivity hubs are my main concern after all that. Subscribed. :)
@@zszywany6412 I use Displayfusion as opposed to Power Toys because the former gives me keybound macros support. I have a whole set keyed off the windows key to do things like full height 1/3 width, full height 1/2 width left aligned, etc etc and it's great
@@Crimson_Tinted At $29 Displayfusion really isn't worth it, compared to what you're getting on PowerToys. And Displayfusion's free version is also quite limited vs PowerToys, so I'm genuinely curious: what are your use cases, and how does Displayfusion help there? :)
Man, why are there no 3:2 monitors. Unfortunately it is also hard to get 16: 10 monitors. Ultrawide is great and all but i want the extra vertical space as well.
Try Microsoft's PowerToys over on GitHub, one of the tools included is FancyZones which allows you to create areas to tile your applications. It's ideal for wide screen displays though I've not used it yet, the software is still under heavy development so it can be glitchy.
I think you need another monitor if you want an ultrawide as odd as that sounds. I use mine for premier or after effects timeline only. It's interesting for gaming. I play City Skylines on my ultrawide and it's great. I also had to learn how to snap windows. It actually works well if you're working with smart layers in Photoshop (you don't have to switch tabs). Not bad for OBS either if you want to break out portions of OBS and get everything on one screen.
I'd just like to add that if you're a music producer or architect and change to a ultrawide monitor, you're basically fucked. I'm pretty sure I'll never consider going back to a 16:9 desktop monitor or even a laptop. Using Gimp, Revit and Twinmotion simultaniously with a manageable screen real state, in the *same* monitor, was a game changer to me. Now I'm fast as fuck, boi. As for the music stuff, now I'm always able to keep an eye on the mix and routing, ever with how littered some VSTs interfaces are. Imho, if you mess with any of those two, do yourself a favour and try an ultrawide.
I don't know. For one, i NEED to have my near field monitors around the display. I don't know that i really NEED NEED them there but i don't think i have a better solution at this time. Naturally i could get them up above it and angle them down, but then i predict them to become incredibly sensitive to my position. Because... well there is a vertical phase cancellation pattern caused by the driver locations and the crossover, completely unavoidable, that's just in the nature of multi-way speakers. For other, yes, the workflow. Just throwing something on the second monitor is so easy! And besides it's not like you can have a fullscreen application in a portion of an ultrawide running at adaptive sync. Third, curve. I understand at sizes like this, it is a necessary evil, and may be relatively inoffensive - i mean, we had Trinitrons/Diamondtrons, and we lived. I haven't edited a video in decades, while i've done CAD and 3D modelling yesterday and digital painting not too long ago. I don't want the extra risk of it confusing me and making me question whether something has a subtle curvature or more or less of it or proportions of things. Fourth, i primarily work with text, and you already made the point about vertical space. Wide FOV gaming would be great, racing sims, FPS, etc, but when HUD is so far out of view, that's an absolute no-go, so you butt up again against software being at odds with it. Besides, i only have a gtx970, so that wouldn't get it very far. Now of course being poor, 1080p 16:9 6-bit panel monitors are the best i can hope for anyway, but with ultrawide and curved gradually becoming available, naturally i had some thoughts.
Just like I thought: I'll keep avoiding ultrawide monitors until most of what I do requires it and is natively supported across the board from the OS level to the software level...
Yeah, it's better to have 2 medium-size monitors than 1 huge ultra-wide. I personally love the idea of 16:10. I have a 27" 1440p monitor (16:9) and also mounted my old 17" 4:3 next to it) So its hight almost fits the new one)
There's software for the snapping you mentioned. And, LG Ultrawides come with that built in. Just FYI. (I've had dual monitors for a long time - at work and at home; and I've never found a use for it.)
@@EposVox yeah, I wrote my comment before the end where you mentioned it. They I searched for it and realized that's where I learned about the software - Display Fusion.
i bought lg 29" ultrawide because i want accurate color with my budgets and didn't want burden my old 1050 and i can oc this monitor close to 4k monitor as daily setting and down scale to 2560x1080 when play game. damn, i didn't want go back to 16:9 monitor if i ever need to buy new monitor
I use windowsGrid for window management, took me all of 2 minutes to install and setup. For streaming it is a hassle. but loving the view in some games.
Why don't windows just give us option to split single screen into 2/3/4 or more in software? Isin't this kinda obvioussly useful feature, especially for big monitors?
I have a 34 UW and a 27 1440p, i feel like that's the best of both worlds with the benefit of dual display but the immersion of uw for games and the extra space for productivity. I've been using a software called diivy to snap into 3rds and stuff, really happy with the set-up and wouldn't want to use anything else (though when I get a bigger desk I'm considering adding another 27 1440p xD
I couldn't get into the 21:9 aspect ratio myself, in FPS games I didn't feel I had more of an advantage then how much it did distract me from keeping my eyes focused where they supposed to be (in the crossair). Other games did feel more immersive but still not to the point I felt I couldn't live without it. The desktop experience however didn't feel that great, I kinda have to use 2 monitors period, and hooking up 2 Ultrawides is kinda expensive and takes up a huge space. Also, alot videos still isn't in the 21:9 ratio and same goes for some games that scales poorly or simply zoom in instead of giving You extra visibility. One screen to consider tho if You need more vertical space and yet get ultrawide: LG 38GL950G-B with 3840x1600, it's still not 2160p if u comming from 4k :)
I had an x34 Predator but really didn't like the lacking Vertical Resolution (and 100hz). I bought a pg27uq and like it much better. The only issue I have now is I wish it was 34"+ I've also had a few 1440/165 monitors, but found myself always wanting more pixles.
You should check out FancyZones that are part of Microsoft's updated Powertoys. It gives you the level of control to create screen regions that should suit you well.
My first ultra-wide will be the Samsung Odyssey G9 as soon as it launches. 5120x1440p, 240hz, 1ms, HDR1000, 1000R curve. It was rumored to launched Q2 of this year, so April/May/June.... I can't wait. And if Big Navi ends up a "true disruption at 4k", it will drive the 5120x1440 no sweat. I mean, we know its going to be double the core count at 80cu's.... that alone I theorized to be 30% faster than a 2080ti.... how did I get that number? Tech Yes City did a video of 2070 super in SLI vs a single 2080ti. In games that supported SLI, the 2070 SLI setup was 30% faster.... I know I know, how does a 2070 super relate to AMD you are asking.... well, the 5700xt is on par with the 2070 super, win some, lose some, tie some, in various games. So 2070 super SLI is like having 5700xt Crossfire.... so it can give us a theoretical performance area to look at. AKA 30%. So Big Navi will be AT LEAST 30% faster than a 2080ti..... but then AMD stated its RDNA2, and that RDNA2 is 50% faster than RDNA at same power consumption.... which means Big Navi can have a MINIMUM of 80% faster performance than a 2080ti. THAT IS INSANE. In my own mind, I think going double cores on a monolithic chip will be even faster than the 30% gains from the SLI setup, mainly because SLI isn't really efficient.... So in my mind, double cores, I assume AT LEAST 50% gains (I double double cores would be 100% gains). So 50% from double cores, then 50% from RDNA2, will be 100% faster than a 2080ti.... that really would disrupt 4k gaming.... If you get 120fps at 4k with X settings, then the new Big Navi should get 240fps at 4k with the same settings based on that % gains. The question is, how much of this ideal is true, and how will Nvidia combat AMD this year? But still, I plan to get Big Navi and the new Samsung Odyssey G9. Its gonna be sweet. I hate dual monitors. I am on dual monitor now, but I have two different ones. I have a 1440p 144hz HDR that I was using for gaming, but now use as a secondary, and my primary I went back to 1080p for 240hz. Which causes a ton of fucking issues. Luckily, the G9 is like having TWO 2560x1440p screens in one. So I can have one monitor that will work the same as two.
I'm wanting so hard one ultra wide, but with at least 120hz, rly love the smoothness of a 120/144hz+. I think with this amount of wideness XD, is needed a GSync or Freesync for those XD.
I jumped on the first 3440x1440 GSync panel that Asus released a ... couple of years ago? I can't actually remember how long ago it was, to be honest. I only do FPS gaming for the most part and I thought the enhanced FoV it would offer would be beneficial. It... turned out to be mostly a waste of desk real estate and a massive distraction. At least IMHO. 16:9 is where it's at for me. I sold it, went back to 16:9 and never looked back.
@@marklawrencegalvan789 you can use 14:9 on unltrawide and the rest for streaming, having discord or something else, or have 16:9 in the middle and black bars on the sides, weare used to black bars all the time up and down, what's the difference on the sides?
ergo tech has some great gas strut monitor arms that would work for you. I got them in my setup and my gf setup. Heavy duty one for the Dell Ultrawide 38 which is 25 pounds. meets the min weight of the ergo tech heavy duty monitor arm. They also got wall mount options.
@@flatlinebb @pinoyG I use a software through steam called "Wallpaper Engine". You can find videos on how to use it. Really nice graphics, and tons of animated wallpapers.
@eposvox seriously though there are tiling window managers available for Windows. Did a quick search and found this Reddit thread on the subject. www.reddit.com/r/windows/comments/2rn775/best_tiled_window_manager_for_windows/
English words are said differently all throughout America and other English speaking countries. “Amateur” is hardly a descriptor appropriate of anyone regarding language lmao
Lots of people, especially when they're custom built. Gotta support the back half where the weight of these hefty monitors goes. otherwise it bows, even with this thick MDF
Disgusting? wut I have cat toys in the floor for my cat to play with and cat hair on the curtain that I'd been lint-rolling 5 times a day if I were to keep them clean. Hardly disgusting at all. Guess you've never had pets.
I love mine for streaming. My two cams and some of my info overlays don't have to cover 5% of my screen. Plus games have a more cinematic feel. Sure, if you are into competitive gaming then sure go for a 16:9 240hz monitor..but for those of you running those monitors in 4K and saying this...get over yourself.
@@TAGSlays I absolutely HATE watching streams from someone who plays ultrawide though. It's nauseating, and i can't even see bloody shit. Either they set an insanely wide FoV or they don't even bother to fix several years old 16:9 games and outright stretch them to ultrawide and when you say "i don't think it's supposed to look like that, all proportions are kinda out of wonk, and my belly is turning upside down" they get incredibly defensive and start blaming the viewer for watching them wrong.
@@TAGSlays if your game supports 21:9 correctly then it's a good experience, but games that just stretch to fit the 21:9 aspect ratio look pretty bad. The extra screen real estate for overlays, widgets, and cams can be really nice depending on the game genre so I can see how 21:9 would be good for certain types of games. Personally though, I've had more issues with gaming and streaming on an ultrawide than I've had good experiences so I can't wait to replace it. For now when I stream/record the first thing I do is set my monitor resolution back to 16:9 ratio so at least there's an easy workaround for it.
@@KuJoe Who plays games stretched? That's just dumb. Use a widescreen app if it supports the game, OR just set the resolution to be 16:9. No stretching. Honestly, If it doesn't play in 21:9 natively I just play it on my 4K monitor. Either way, never play it in stretched mode. The monitor will do 21:9, and 16:9 both... So there are black bars on the sides. Still no reason to NOT play the game in the proper aspect ratio. Most AAA games support UWHD today. And if they don't I generally do not support them.
@@EposVox understandable, but watching it on a standard 1080p monitor goes to show how insane the aspect ratio is. If its visual quality stays the same as the standard artpro monitors at my company's studio, I'd be lusting for this for my home. I just wish it wasn't curved and isn't useful for my purposes.
I've been using 3440x1440 for about 3 years and 4k for 2 years. If anyone's interested, I'll share my impressions too.
# My Recent Monitor History:
*2009* -- Triple 22"
*2010* -- Replaced center monitor with a 30" 16:9 in landscape; turned the two 22" flanking it into portrait.
*2017* -- 34" 3440x1440 replaced all of that. Not having a second monitor still made me itch.
*2018* -- 23" 2160p added to scratch that itch. Subsequently decided to build a dedicated gaming rig. 3440x1440 moved to the gaming rig and bought a second 4k for the workstation. In other words, ultrawide on the gaming rig and dual 23" 2160p (4k) monitors on the workstation.
*2019* -- 43" 2160p took the ultrawide's spot on the gaming rig. What to do with the ultrawide? I moved it back to the workstation in addition to the 2x 4k displays. So now it's dual 4k plus ultrawide on the workstation and a 43" 4k for the gaming rig.
*Streaming/Recording*
For streaming or recording, I'd _emphatically_ suggest to anyone to stay at 16:9. The pixel scaling issues, and then the layout hassles aren't worth it. Whether you letterbox or crop, half of your audience will complain. I'd say go with 2160p if you can/want, but good old 1080p if you can't or don't care about that many pixels. 2160 --> 1080 is easy downscaling. 1440 --> 720 is another 2:1 step. At 1080p, your resolution won't be a reason you're not growing/retaining viewers. 720 might get you the occasional comment, but this channel has shown how it could actually improve your stream to do so. Either is plenty good, especially with the continuing shift to viewership in handheld screens. Ultrawide content creators definitely have more of a struggle. It's wonky on non-ultrawide displays and viewers click away.
*I just wanna play, man*
For gaming with no regard for recording/streaming, it depends on what you play. I love the real estate of the 21:9 monitor for some games like MMOs where I can have some UI elements up but out of my way, or panoramic games, driving games, etc. Side scrollers are interesting on ultra-wide. However, for some older titles, they'll puke all over your screen if you try to play them. Skyrim for example, the UI gets very derpy to the point of unusable without some mods that replace the elements with ultrawide versions, but then those mods may not be compatible with other mods you might want. However, when I go back to 16:9 I really miss the panorama sometimes. I've done multi-monitor gaming in the past, starting with expensive hardware signal splitters and even with small bezels, it just isn't the same.
*4K?*
As for 4k, I was very hyped when I got my first monitor. I'd heard all the amazing tales and I was so excited to bask in the glory. When I fired up a few games after plugging it in, my reaction was kinda "That's it?" Now, where I really noticed the pixel density made a huge difference for me when working with text. So much crisper and less eye fatigue. I immediately switched over to doing the bulk of my 'day job' work primarily on 4k and I've noticed a huge difference in how my eyes feel at the end of a day.
*Large Format*
I had a 30" 16:9 at my desk at one point, but it was too big. Eye movement was way too excessive and lead to headaches and eye fatigue. If you can push back away from it, it's fine. That actually lead to where I'm at now with my gaming monitor. I'm using a 43" 2160p for gaming, but it's like 2 arms-lengths away from me. Last year, my wife and I set up side-by-side gaming stations with mini-recliners and 43" 4k monitors. We looked up THX guidelines for screen size to viewing distance, and at that scale, the 4k is worthwhile IMO for gaming or video/movies. It's been great, both from a gaming perspective and a relationship perspective.
*Current Workstation*
The desk where my workstation is at is set up in an L-shape with two 27" 2160p monitors on one side and a 34" 3440x1440 on the other. I just can't make up my mind. My eyes love working on the higher pixel density of the 4k monitors, but there are some tasks that are just nicer to do on the wider screen. I can't quite bring myself to ditch the ultra-wide. If I could have a 21:9 with the pixel pitch/density of a 23" 4k monitor, that just might be my perfect monitor if I could have only one. I do find myself enjoying having at least one additional monitor though, even if it's just to throw up TH-cam of Netflix. If I could only have one monitor and I was stuck with a 16:9, I'd be very, very frustrated. Being stuck with one monitor at 21:9 is less painful than a single monitor at 16:9.
I'm not totally content with the display situation on my workstation. Having both the dual 4k side and the ultra-wide side feels wasteful and excessive and not particularly ergonomic. Frankly, it's a bit awkward to use. It's more like having two workstations where I have to rotate 90-degrees to use one or the other. The ultra-wide is just too wide to comfortable have flanking monitors like my old triple-monitor setup. They'd be usable for something like half-backgrounding some TH-cam videos while you work or throwing up some seldom-used monitoring software or something, but the eye and head movement wouldn't be nice for a long workday if it was something more actively used.
I'm toying with the idea of experimenting with a pair of 15.6" 1080p monitors in portrait (since they'll match the screen height of the 23") in a triple monitor config. I prefer having one main central monitor versus having to cock my head left or right for prolonged periods with a dual setup.
*Recommendations:*
* Streaming/recording: 16:9 @ 2160p if you wan/want; 1080p if you can't/don't.
* For gaming and not streaming/recording: 3440x1440 accepting that some older titles may need to be played in windowed mode if available.
* Only going to have one monitor: 3440x1440 and see if Asus MultiFrame, Display Fusion or similar will help.
* For working with text: All other things being equal, a higher resolution on the same size screen will be much easier on the eyes (assuming the text is scaled so you aren't having to squint.)
For a dream dedicated editing station, I imagine you'd want maybe 4 monitors if you have room & budget.
(1) 3440x1440 for your timeline and main editor suite UI
(2) A standard office monitor where you have all of your clips, assets, etc to grab and pull in quickly. (Panoramic ideal)
(3) A standard office monitor for things like the script, notes, desktop, etc. (Panoramic ideal)
(4) Reference/grading monitor where you can fullscreen the project you're working on
* Note separate GPUs are recommended for the displays and image processing.
I know that's a heck of a lot of text for a YT comment, and only the most dedicated of monitor nerds (like me) will have actually read it, but I hope it's useful to at least someone. :)
Thank you for this. It really helped me
I appreciate this. Thank you! helped me decide on my Ultra Wide 1440
Thank you for that!
I don't have an external monitor yet. But I want to have an ultrawide.. just for timeline in editing videos. And another one like 4k or 10bit color for true color displays :)
I am currently in the market to find a good gaming monitor so YES, your comment is very useful at least to me. Question though. I'm mainly a MMO gamer (waiting on WOW Shadowlands atm). Would you go 3440x1440 or 4k 16:9 for that specific game. Ty in advance.
Thank you for the native 21:9 upload, looks a lot better! especially on my 21:9 monitor - 2560x1080
I cannot agree more about valuing desk space. I can't even bring myself to put my PCs ON the desk. Always on the floor under or next to my desk.
same
I might not be able to do that as my cat likes to lick my computer case (rather humerously, I asked Fractal Design if there's a hidden catnip storage area. They responded too! 😂
And you uploaded it in 21.9! Love it!
Have you had a look at powertoys and fancyzones? It would allow you to do some easier resizing and management.
Ultra-wide... It's fun until your friends catch you doing it.
Just got my wife an UWHD monitor and she absolutely loves the extra real estate and playing FPS games no longer give her a headache due to FOV issues.
I love seeing your YT sub counter above your monitors already be out of date by the time you publish your videos
hahaha, it's fun!
Just got my first ultrawide a few days ago. TH-cam suggested this video today...so I click...and the video is done in ultrawide. lol Very nice.
That’s the idea!
can i just thank you for uploading a 21x9 video. had me tripped out i thought i had my ultrawide video extension active.
This is the aspect ratio all videos should be in.
Definitely not
Now you need to get a 49" doublewide. Dual 1440 panels with no bezels.
Why would he downgrade to 1440p lol
As someone that jumped on the ultrawide bandwagon really early, I can't disagree with any of your points.
I honestly thought we'd have some better options for snapping to the middle, or setting custom zones or... something, by now. Newp. I can make my windows take up half the screen or all of it. those are my options. I currently am in the habit of snapping firefox to the right, and discord to the left, then dragging firefox over until I can fit a full youtube video into the window.
I'm running the Acer XCR341CK (Terrible name. The g-sync version is the "Predator", and I'm over here with a screen I spent $300 less and I get this shit) which is a really nice 10-bit IPS panel @75hz with a freesync range from 30-75hz. Movies are beautiful. Games are amazing. I can't not use adaptive sync, and though it's not 100hz or 144hz, 75hz is still a pretty decent step over 60.
I have no desire to replace my screen any time soon. But it has it's frustrations and I can't ever recommend ultrawide to people without a big asterisk and some qualifiers.
Have you looked into FancyZones included in the Microsoft PowerToys collection? It allows you to set custom zones and snap windows to them. I have a PG348Q and I just discovered this and it's fantastic.
Display fusion is also great at quickly moving windows around your monitors and snapping them to different sections quickly via shortcuts. I have shortcuts to snap left and right, move and maximize between monitors, as well as a four window grid
@@BrandonPopson This. I set mine up with 2 zones, as it's better for the type of work I do, but you have a lot of flexibility to organize them as you please.
I got an ultrawide because of everyone saying it was the thing. I accidentally irreparably broke it. I was so glad to go back to 16:9.
This video really helped me out a lot with my decision, thank you very much. I would recommend maybe trying to organize your office a bit better though (no offense) lol
Hi EposVox, I have some trouble with OBS and Premiere Pro. My Premiere Pro is extremely laggy when playing back a file recorded with OBS, no matter what setting I use, and I'm using a i9 9900k with an RTX 2070 Super with 32GB RAM, so that couldn't be the issue, right?.. Could you make an updated 2020 OBS settings video? That would be awesome! Love your video's :)
i have vagas pro 17 no lag ,,, look in settings to adjustmore ram use and change the preview window setting to somet lower
@@RichMantaray Thanks for your answer. I'm giving 28GB of my RAM to Premiere, and it even lags with 1/4th quality. Something really strange is going on and I don't know what it is..
I use Vegas pro 15 magixx
No lag with 1080p or 1440p obs videos
On a Ryzen5-1400 and gtx 1060 6gb
I have 2 Dell 34" curved UWHD monitors. U3415W's. Both are very heavy. Both are on gas shock arms and they are working as intended.
I've been trying many monitors, however, found 34" 3440x1440 the best option for me (for coding, movies, and sometimes games with split screen). Now I'm reconsidering my workspace again. Finally deciding between 32" UHD and 34" 3440x1440. The good thing about 34" is that I can easily split screen and use two apps, and I'm satisfied to have only one monitor cos it works like two.
But the total square of 32" is a bit bigger than 34", so I'm still thinking...
Even after getting my 34' 1440p a few years back I still kept my dual 1080 setup to flank the big one . Trust me after a while it will feel wrong to use any smaller aspect monitors. I would try adding a second one in portrait to the right to be used for comms use like discord, web browsing, and other tasks while "content creating". Forgoing the stand I went with a monitor riser shelf so I can still have storage underneath it.
As an owner of an ultrawide monitor myself, I'd love to see more of your videos in 2.35:1/cinemascope! Any chance we'll get some more in the future? I loved watching your past few videos in this aspect ratio on floatplane
Oh but giving up those up-down pixels mmm, yeah I'm not sure I feel this.. That's 720 pixels! ..:)
Please tell me what webcam mount are you using on the Brio?
I appreciate this video for being in 21:9 friendly haha
Monitor arms that hold 17ish lbs will not function as advertised with a heavier monitor. That doesn't mean they will not hold a heavier one. See, a lot of them can be tightened, but will gradually lose flexibility. Mine is holding the 120hz Dell Alienware ultrawide. I had to tighten it so much that I can't easily move it up or down, I had to find a good height and sort of lock it at that. But it did allow me to get it at a good height and distance that I am very happy with. This arm was only $35, and entirely worth it just for that use IMO.
YESSSSSS WELCOME TO ULTRAWIDE BROTHERRRR *evil face*
@EposVox, A great video and honest review I have seen. Thank You so much. I have a humble question to ask, In my country, I am getting this around $1100 USD, and in the other, I was interested in LG34WN80-B at $1000 (Adding all those custom duty charges, etc). So I think this is a better deal for me considering high frame rates, But I am worried about the connectivity with mac (USB c), how does it work? it's fine? You are mentioning that there is some kind of issue with this as it does not work as USB c for connectivity. I am not sure. Kindly guide me. Looking forward. :) I want to use it mainly with my mac, and windows often & connectivity hubs are my main concern after all that.
Subscribed. :)
Respect for representing halo love in this vid :)
I never though of that! Thanks for bring in the streamer view into attention (Y)
Very nice monitor!
Now...... How can I stream with it? That's my dilemma
I have 49” Samsung 32:9 monitor. Any arm that could help me out for this size? For window managment I use Power Toys.
Exactly, use PowerToys - look for Fancy Zones!
@@zszywany6412 I use Displayfusion as opposed to Power Toys because the former gives me keybound macros support. I have a whole set keyed off the windows key to do things like full height 1/3 width, full height 1/2 width left aligned, etc etc and it's great
@@Crimson_Tinted At $29 Displayfusion really isn't worth it, compared to what you're getting on PowerToys. And Displayfusion's free version is also quite limited vs PowerToys, so I'm genuinely curious: what are your use cases, and how does Displayfusion help there? :)
Man, why are there no 3:2 monitors. Unfortunately it is also hard to get 16: 10 monitors. Ultrawide is great and all but i want the extra vertical space as well.
I like the desktop computer on the left : ) so old school hehe
Try Microsoft's PowerToys over on GitHub, one of the tools included is FancyZones which allows you to create areas to tile your applications. It's ideal for wide screen displays though I've not used it yet, the software is still under heavy development so it can be glitchy.
I think you need another monitor if you want an ultrawide as odd as that sounds. I use mine for premier or after effects timeline only. It's interesting for gaming. I play City Skylines on my ultrawide and it's great. I also had to learn how to snap windows. It actually works well if you're working with smart layers in Photoshop (you don't have to switch tabs). Not bad for OBS either if you want to break out portions of OBS and get everything on one screen.
I'd just like to add that if you're a music producer or architect and change to a ultrawide monitor, you're basically fucked. I'm pretty sure I'll never consider going back to a 16:9 desktop monitor or even a laptop.
Using Gimp, Revit and Twinmotion simultaniously with a manageable screen real state, in the *same* monitor, was a game changer to me. Now I'm fast as fuck, boi.
As for the music stuff, now I'm always able to keep an eye on the mix and routing, ever with how littered some VSTs interfaces are.
Imho, if you mess with any of those two, do yourself a favour and try an ultrawide.
What is this, a video that fills my entire screen? Unhead of!
Btw, use windows powertoys for custom window areas.
I don't know.
For one, i NEED to have my near field monitors around the display. I don't know that i really NEED NEED them there but i don't think i have a better solution at this time. Naturally i could get them up above it and angle them down, but then i predict them to become incredibly sensitive to my position. Because... well there is a vertical phase cancellation pattern caused by the driver locations and the crossover, completely unavoidable, that's just in the nature of multi-way speakers.
For other, yes, the workflow. Just throwing something on the second monitor is so easy! And besides it's not like you can have a fullscreen application in a portion of an ultrawide running at adaptive sync.
Third, curve. I understand at sizes like this, it is a necessary evil, and may be relatively inoffensive - i mean, we had Trinitrons/Diamondtrons, and we lived. I haven't edited a video in decades, while i've done CAD and 3D modelling yesterday and digital painting not too long ago. I don't want the extra risk of it confusing me and making me question whether something has a subtle curvature or more or less of it or proportions of things.
Fourth, i primarily work with text, and you already made the point about vertical space.
Wide FOV gaming would be great, racing sims, FPS, etc, but when HUD is so far out of view, that's an absolute no-go, so you butt up again against software being at odds with it. Besides, i only have a gtx970, so that wouldn't get it very far. Now of course being poor, 1080p 16:9 6-bit panel monitors are the best i can hope for anyway, but with ultrawide and curved gradually becoming available, naturally i had some thoughts.
Just like I thought: I'll keep avoiding ultrawide monitors until most of what I do requires it and is natively supported across the board from the OS level to the software level...
For me the curve helps not straining my eyes, because my eyes don't have to refocus as much as they do on a flat 16:9 monitor.
Yeah, it's better to have 2 medium-size monitors than 1 huge ultra-wide. I personally love the idea of 16:10. I have a 27" 1440p monitor (16:9) and also mounted my old 17" 4:3 next to it) So its hight almost fits the new one)
There's software for the snapping you mentioned. And, LG Ultrawides come with that built in. Just FYI. (I've had dual monitors for a long time - at work and at home; and I've never found a use for it.)
That's funny. I found the software I mentioned for David Zhang's TH-cam channel. 😁
Pretty sure I mentioned it lol
@@EposVox yeah, I wrote my comment before the end where you mentioned it. They I searched for it and realized that's where I learned about the software - Display Fusion.
i bought lg 29" ultrawide because i want accurate color with my budgets and didn't want burden my old 1050
and i can oc this monitor close to 4k monitor as daily setting and down scale to 2560x1080 when play game.
damn, i didn't want go back to 16:9 monitor if i ever need to buy new monitor
I use windowsGrid for window management, took me all of 2 minutes to install and setup. For streaming it is a hassle. but loving the view in some games.
Dude, you made an Sony PVM for you intro?!
And it's 80's vaporwave'y too?!
I like this guy already
How are you editing game footage as mostly the variable frame rates mess up premiere ? Are you transcoding to constant?
I use resolve but also ShadowPlay tends to stay cfr for me most of the time these days
Why don't windows just give us option to split single screen into 2/3/4 or more in software? Isin't this kinda obvioussly useful feature, especially for big monitors?
Whoa!, Was actually surprised this video filled my 21x9 monitor. That never happens on YT. lol
Real talk, the LG 43UD79-B and Dell P4317Q are the best productivity panels. Use a different monitor for dedicated ultrawide gaming.
Who is best beetwen proart pa34vc and pa34v
can u help me ? how can i Changing input port on ASUS ProArt PA34VC
Try Microsoft PowerToys for the the FancyZones, this might be want you want.
Utrawide must have!
nice black assistant you have!
I have a 34 UW and a 27 1440p, i feel like that's the best of both worlds with the benefit of dual display but the immersion of uw for games and the extra space for productivity. I've been using a software called diivy to snap into 3rds and stuff, really happy with the set-up and wouldn't want to use anything else (though when I get a bigger desk I'm considering adding another 27 1440p xD
where do u get a animated halo desktop background?
I couldn't get into the 21:9 aspect ratio myself, in FPS games I didn't feel I had more of an advantage then how much it did distract me from keeping my eyes focused where they supposed to be (in the crossair). Other games did feel more immersive but still not to the point I felt I couldn't live without it. The desktop experience however didn't feel that great, I kinda have to use 2 monitors period, and hooking up 2 Ultrawides is kinda expensive and takes up a huge space. Also, alot videos still isn't in the 21:9 ratio and same goes for some games that scales poorly or simply zoom in instead of giving You extra visibility. One screen to consider tho if You need more vertical space and yet get ultrawide: LG 38GL950G-B with 3840x1600, it's still not 2160p if u comming from 4k :)
I had an x34 Predator but really didn't like the lacking Vertical Resolution (and 100hz). I bought a pg27uq and like it much better. The only issue I have now is I wish it was 34"+
I've also had a few 1440/165 monitors, but found myself always wanting more pixles.
You should check out FancyZones that are part of Microsoft's updated Powertoys. It gives you the level of control to create screen regions that should suit you well.
I would use a 32:9 monitor that can display 2 inputs at the same time. So you would have 2 screens on one monitor.
with much less ergonomic division of the space. i'd far rather just have the two monitors
My first ultra-wide will be the Samsung Odyssey G9 as soon as it launches.
5120x1440p, 240hz, 1ms, HDR1000, 1000R curve.
It was rumored to launched Q2 of this year, so April/May/June.... I can't wait.
And if Big Navi ends up a "true disruption at 4k", it will drive the 5120x1440 no sweat. I mean, we know its going to be double the core count at 80cu's.... that alone I theorized to be 30% faster than a 2080ti.... how did I get that number? Tech Yes City did a video of 2070 super in SLI vs a single 2080ti. In games that supported SLI, the 2070 SLI setup was 30% faster.... I know I know, how does a 2070 super relate to AMD you are asking.... well, the 5700xt is on par with the 2070 super, win some, lose some, tie some, in various games. So 2070 super SLI is like having 5700xt Crossfire.... so it can give us a theoretical performance area to look at. AKA 30%. So Big Navi will be AT LEAST 30% faster than a 2080ti..... but then AMD stated its RDNA2, and that RDNA2 is 50% faster than RDNA at same power consumption.... which means Big Navi can have a MINIMUM of 80% faster performance than a 2080ti. THAT IS INSANE. In my own mind, I think going double cores on a monolithic chip will be even faster than the 30% gains from the SLI setup, mainly because SLI isn't really efficient.... So in my mind, double cores, I assume AT LEAST 50% gains (I double double cores would be 100% gains). So 50% from double cores, then 50% from RDNA2, will be 100% faster than a 2080ti.... that really would disrupt 4k gaming.... If you get 120fps at 4k with X settings, then the new Big Navi should get 240fps at 4k with the same settings based on that % gains. The question is, how much of this ideal is true, and how will Nvidia combat AMD this year?
But still, I plan to get Big Navi and the new Samsung Odyssey G9. Its gonna be sweet. I hate dual monitors. I am on dual monitor now, but I have two different ones. I have a 1440p 144hz HDR that I was using for gaming, but now use as a secondary, and my primary I went back to 1080p for 240hz. Which causes a ton of fucking issues. Luckily, the G9 is like having TWO 2560x1440p screens in one. So I can have one monitor that will work the same as two.
Any update?
@@enseaay4215 not out yet senior. official launch says july 13th for me on my amazon pre-order. so i dont have it yet.
I'm wanting so hard one ultra wide, but with at least 120hz, rly love the smoothness of a 120/144hz+. I think with this amount of wideness XD, is needed a GSync or Freesync for those XD.
And for programing, wider monitors are reallyyyyy good XD
I jumped on the first 3440x1440 GSync panel that Asus released a ... couple of years ago? I can't actually remember how long ago it was, to be honest. I only do FPS gaming for the most part and I thought the enhanced FoV it would offer would be beneficial. It... turned out to be mostly a waste of desk real estate and a massive distraction. At least IMHO. 16:9 is where it's at for me. I sold it, went back to 16:9 and never looked back.
Jason Van Patten glad I read your comment. I was torn between getting a 27 inch 1440p 144hz or an ultrawide monitor. Def staying away from ultrawides.
@@marklawrencegalvan789 you can use 14:9 on unltrawide and the rest for streaming, having discord or something else, or have 16:9 in the middle and black bars on the sides, weare used to black bars all the time up and down, what's the difference on the sides?
About the screen capturing...couldn't you just have used the NVIDIA DSR with Windows DPI-Scaling? (DSR Factor of 1.5 to go from 1440p to 2160p)
Yeah that looks horrible
you look like that guy from Horizon zero dawn, who has a crush on aloy :D
ergo tech has some great gas strut monitor arms that would work for you. I got them in my setup and my gf setup. Heavy duty one for the Dell Ultrawide 38 which is 25 pounds. meets the min weight of the ergo tech heavy duty monitor arm. They also got wall mount options.
Is there a builit in KVM switch?
The amount of cat hair everywhere makes my OCD go crazy.
Hahaha
How to do a live wallpaper like that on your screen?
I would like to know as well please.
@@flatlinebb @pinoyG I use a software through steam called "Wallpaper Engine". You can find videos on how to use it. Really nice graphics, and tons of animated wallpapers.
8K is okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
First experience with an "ultrawide"... That could still mean something else than a monitor. :p
wide boi
DAM i use my usb hubs on monitor for USB plug for head set g933
Yoooooooooooo 8K?
I left the review and focused on his voice🥺
i dont even like looking at this video in this aspect ratio, but not tried gaming on a widescreen, maybe that is better.
Wait why this video doesn't fill my phone completely :( me no like black bars
...because it's ultrawide.
laughs in Sony
11:00 either thats some ugly Lanczos rescaling or sharpness filter going wild.
For advanced windows managment, you can try FancyZones: github.com/microsoft/PowerToys/tree/master/src/modules/fancyzones
I hear you talking about window management issues and I have an answer for you ... Linux + a tiling window manager like i3 or AwesomeWM. #ThisIsTheWay
Ahh I see: I won't have trouble managing my windows if none of the windows I need to manage are supported in the OS. Smart!
@@EposVox yeah there is that problem ;-)
@eposvox seriously though there are tiling window managers available for Windows. Did a quick search and found this Reddit thread on the subject. www.reddit.com/r/windows/comments/2rn775/best_tiled_window_manager_for_windows/
get display fusion [multi-monitor support and custom window-snap-zones
literally mentioned it in the video
@@EposVox oh, missed it >
That's what she said :o its to big :o
But gaming wise... It's just a different world
Most ultrawide monitors have software like this: www.asus.com/us/support/FAQ/1016271/
Bro, it's "pro" ductivity, not "product-ivity"! thanks!
Lots of people say words differently throughout the world. Thanks!
@@EposVox yes but that's not French, in English it has a certain pronunciation, you're welcome. if you want to sound amateur that's fine w me
English words are said differently all throughout America and other English speaking countries. “Amateur” is hardly a descriptor appropriate of anyone regarding language lmao
Old Pc are only cool if they’re really old... That thing there is just an ugly waste of desk space.
8:43 for using it
omg who dont use an UW these days lol
Most people.
That room smells musty 🥴
Definitely not
Clean your room first!!!!!
Hellooooo:... helloooo: ...hellooo: ...hellloo: ...helllo....Hell NO!
DUDE! Clean your room! Looks like food and garbage all over the floor.
cat toys. there's cat toys on the floor. where they go.
It doesn't fit in your workspace......
Yeah because you has 2 cubic meters of crap, seriously, buy a hoover
Buy a vacuum to suck up my monitors and computers? That's not how this works
after watching the video, i conclude that your problem lies with shitty desk setup.... who bolts desks to the wall?
Lots of people, especially when they're custom built. Gotta support the back half where the weight of these hefty monitors goes. otherwise it bows, even with this thick MDF
What a disgusting room really :(
Disgusting? wut
I have cat toys in the floor for my cat to play with and cat hair on the curtain that I'd been lint-rolling 5 times a day if I were to keep them clean. Hardly disgusting at all. Guess you've never had pets.
I have few regrets in life, one is buying an ultrawide monitor for gaming. For productivity? YES! For gaming/streaming? NOPE!
I love mine for streaming. My two cams and some of my info overlays don't have to cover 5% of my screen. Plus games have a more cinematic feel. Sure, if you are into competitive gaming then sure go for a 16:9 240hz monitor..but for those of you running those monitors in 4K and saying this...get over yourself.
@@TAGSlays I absolutely HATE watching streams from someone who plays ultrawide though. It's nauseating, and i can't even see bloody shit. Either they set an insanely wide FoV or they don't even bother to fix several years old 16:9 games and outright stretch them to ultrawide and when you say "i don't think it's supposed to look like that, all proportions are kinda out of wonk, and my belly is turning upside down" they get incredibly defensive and start blaming the viewer for watching them wrong.
@@TAGSlays if your game supports 21:9 correctly then it's a good experience, but games that just stretch to fit the 21:9 aspect ratio look pretty bad. The extra screen real estate for overlays, widgets, and cams can be really nice depending on the game genre so I can see how 21:9 would be good for certain types of games. Personally though, I've had more issues with gaming and streaming on an ultrawide than I've had good experiences so I can't wait to replace it. For now when I stream/record the first thing I do is set my monitor resolution back to 16:9 ratio so at least there's an easy workaround for it.
@@KuJoe Who plays games stretched? That's just dumb. Use a widescreen app if it supports the game, OR just set the resolution to be 16:9. No stretching. Honestly, If it doesn't play in 21:9 natively I just play it on my 4K monitor. Either way, never play it in stretched mode. The monitor will do 21:9, and 16:9 both... So there are black bars on the sides. Still no reason to NOT play the game in the proper aspect ratio. Most AAA games support UWHD today. And if they don't I generally do not support them.
zzzzzzzzz
Buy new desk lol
?
EposVox auto correct. Buy Bigger desk maybe ikea 👍
@@fred215 I only use custom made desks. You can see very easily there's no pre-built that meets my needs that would possibly be worth it.
the format of this video is ridiculous
It's in ultrawide... Because it's about ultrawide monitors... So this video fills an ultrawide monitor...
@@EposVox understandable, but watching it on a standard 1080p monitor goes to show how insane the aspect ratio is. If its visual quality stays the same as the standard artpro monitors at my company's studio, I'd be lusting for this for my home. I just wish it wasn't curved and isn't useful for my purposes.